5 minutes in the narrator states there are no details of the discoveror of he skeleton but then immediately tells us Brien Foerester claims to have found them! Which is it please?
I was interested until Forester was mentioned. He's claimed to have found Noah's ark, (a mud flow along with at least 2 others, see google earth), the Ark of the Covenant , and Golgotha if my memory serves me. I used to pay attention to his claims until I realized he excelled best at making mountains out of mole hills and embarrassing Christianity. Sorry, I don't mean to be unkind but I voted with my feet.
7:38 You meant to say "Off the coast of Palestine" Israel is not a legitimate country, it is an illegal occupier state, and as such, has no coastline. There is no such place as israel, there is only illegally occupied Palestine.
I remember that. That's at 5:39, but I thought that they were bigger. As far as the Paracus skulls go, DNA analysis have been done several times. The problem they said was contamination. After that was straitened out a complete DNA analysis was completed by several different sites. Mitochondrial DNA tests were preformed. What it showed was that the mother was human and the father was from a yet unknown species.. It originated around the Baltic Sea around 3,500 years ago. Brien Foerster has done a lot of studying of the elongated skulls of Peru. Besides its pure size these skulls have other traits that human elongated skulls do not have. So, to just dismiss the findings would be ignorant.
These are all very good explained, but still interesting! The skeletal “alien” mummy you flashed on screen has an interesting explanation. It’s likely from the last 100 year and is a stillborn baby. That area had its waters heavily polluted by industrial waste (with out telling the native people of course) and lead to many birth defects and miscarriages
5 minutes in the narrator states there are no details of the discoveror of he skeleton but then immediately tells us
Brien Foerester claims to have found them! Which is it please?
Jusr look up 'nazca mummies'. It has been tested to be authentic by universities.
Brian is a liar
I was interested until Forester was mentioned. He's claimed to have found Noah's ark, (a mud flow along with at least 2 others, see google earth), the Ark of the Covenant , and Golgotha if my memory serves me. I used to pay attention to his claims until I realized he excelled best at making mountains out of mole hills and embarrassing Christianity. Sorry, I don't mean to be unkind but I voted with my feet.
thx
They CAN if they think Biological at the same time.
? What are you talking about
7:38 You meant to say "Off the coast of Palestine"
Israel is not a legitimate country, it is an illegal occupier state, and as such, has no coastline. There is no such place as israel, there is only illegally occupied Palestine.
Forester??? That's all I need to know.
No sound.
Coat hangers and paper mache.
I remember that. That's at 5:39, but I thought that they were bigger. As far as the Paracus skulls go, DNA analysis have been done several times. The problem they said was contamination. After that was straitened out a complete DNA analysis was completed by several different sites. Mitochondrial DNA tests were preformed. What it showed was that the mother was human and the father was from a yet unknown species.. It originated around the Baltic Sea around 3,500 years ago. Brien Foerster has done a lot of studying of the elongated skulls of Peru. Besides its pure size these skulls have other traits that human elongated skulls do not have. So, to just dismiss the findings would be ignorant.
These are all very good explained, but still interesting! The skeletal “alien” mummy you flashed on screen has an interesting explanation. It’s likely from the last 100 year and is a stillborn baby. That area had its waters heavily polluted by industrial waste (with out telling the native people of course) and lead to many birth defects and miscarriages
This is NOT real, do NOT bother...?
Don't tell me what to do.
@@jakewilson4679 Since there was NO exclamation-mark and only a question-mark, that would make you deceptive?