I haven't gotten past the trap question yet, but I think I know the trap: there are some circumstances in which you *should* treat one person more favorably than others -- if, for example, you're dealing with a bunch of drunks in the aftermath of a bar fight, and three of them are being rowdy, uncooperative, aggressive, and attempting to continue the fight with you. The fourth is looking embarrassed and apologizing for their friends' actions, trying to get them to calm down and behave. And, knowing their friends pretty well, they're even starting to get some results. You would be a fool not to recognize the value in working together with the cooperator in order to secure better behavior from the others. This is a situation in which, *of course* you give one of them better treatment than the others. They earned that by presenting different *behavior* from that of the others. What the question presumably had in mind, of course, is 'how would you ensure you didn't treat someone favorably for irrational -- or even perhaps discriminatory -- reasons. And sure, you have to actually answer that, but first you should dispose of the premise that it applies to every possible situation in which you might have a reason to treat one person differently from others. It doesn't.
How do i get to join the police-ive been in the army at 17 till 22,done bits with west/north Yorkshire police-i would not be bothered about arrestin,just boots on the ground
I haven't gotten past the trap question yet, but I think I know the trap: there are some circumstances in which you *should* treat one person more favorably than others -- if, for example, you're dealing with a bunch of drunks in the aftermath of a bar fight, and three of them are being rowdy, uncooperative, aggressive, and attempting to continue the fight with you. The fourth is looking embarrassed and apologizing for their friends' actions, trying to get them to calm down and behave. And, knowing their friends pretty well, they're even starting to get some results.
You would be a fool not to recognize the value in working together with the cooperator in order to secure better behavior from the others. This is a situation in which, *of course* you give one of them better treatment than the others. They earned that by presenting different *behavior* from that of the others.
What the question presumably had in mind, of course, is 'how would you ensure you didn't treat someone favorably for irrational -- or even perhaps discriminatory -- reasons. And sure, you have to actually answer that, but first you should dispose of the premise that it applies to every possible situation in which you might have a reason to treat one person differently from others. It doesn't.
Says their is a trick and Doesn’t tell us what it is 😂
i think there needs to be more examples included in this
I think you need to join the Academy to get more examples!!!! :)
I literally have my interview in 3 hours wow
How did it go?
@@foggers0476 I think it went well, not sure how long they take to let you know but fingers crossed!
Hope it went well
@@412tt I'm sure you did well, what force was it for?
@@412ttDid you get the job?
How do i get to join the police-ive been in the army at 17 till 22,done bits with west/north Yorkshire police-i would not be bothered about arrestin,just boots on the ground
Arresting is part of the job in all honesty
Apply to your local force online, I just applied with Kent police, just go on the website and choose your entry route based on your circumstance.