Sen. Schumer planning Senate vote to restore ban on gun bump stocks

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
  • Sen. Chuck Schumer is planning a Senate vote to restore a ban on gun bump stocks after the Supreme Court reversed it on Friday.

ความคิดเห็น • 78

  • @mariekamerdula7641
    @mariekamerdula7641 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Elections coming up.

  • @charleshamilton6555
    @charleshamilton6555 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    The statement that a using a bump-stock makes a semi in to an auto is just not true. And some shooters (probably most), a lot, can trigger fire faster than a bump-stock. It's just another anti-gun ploy. Remember the slippery slope. .
    🇺🇸❤

    • @Dan-di9jd
      @Dan-di9jd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem is that it comes down to intentions. The ATF determined that you violate the NFA's full auto definition because you had the intention to violate it, but under the definition of NFA the weapon is not a full auto because you still have to pull the trigger, and then release it to reset the trigger to fire another round. With that said, I would agree that anyone who has a bump stock is in fact trying to go around the law but I think the way the dem would word this is would effectively ban semi-autos without anyone really understanding what is going on and due to how the SOCTUS worded their ruling, the proposed law, if passed, would effectively be upheld in future appeals. I do not believe the SCOTUS handed the 2A community a win as much as people are thinking.

  • @LawandOrder-fi5xk
    @LawandOrder-fi5xk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Recall Schumer and vote these democrats out of office.

  • @fletcherjacobs3688
    @fletcherjacobs3688 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The guns over some of the guns that were used in Vegas were from an operation that the US conducted cold operation, fast and furious, where they lost these guns only to resurface and incident like Vegas. And none of them had bump stocks.

    • @frankdrevinpolicesquad2930
      @frankdrevinpolicesquad2930 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Anyone in the military who has heard the fire from the hotel in Vegas knows it is the sound of a belt fed SAW, not a bump stock

  • @ROLLAND-hz6ud
    @ROLLAND-hz6ud 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    you will need more than a senate vote

  • @doylefoust4802
    @doylefoust4802 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Hogwash you can't make a duck into a cow unless you alter a semi-automatic you're not going to make it into a machine gun

  • @scottlanghoff8729
    @scottlanghoff8729 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Which means nothing, because it won pass in the House in an Election Year.
    So here we are…

  • @LeahSmith-c4h
    @LeahSmith-c4h 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This guy is such a weasel

  • @suzannecrain2524
    @suzannecrain2524 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Supreme Court rules

    • @Dan-di9jd
      @Dan-di9jd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's going to win big so it's not really a valid argument nor a positive threat in bills he propose.

    • @suzannecrain2524
      @suzannecrain2524 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dan-di9jd Supreme Court overrides congress and senate

    • @Dan-di9jd
      @Dan-di9jd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@suzannecrain2524 laws passed by legislators take rule. The entire scotus decision is that atf can’t pass the law but through legislation.

    • @suzannecrain2524
      @suzannecrain2524 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dan-di9jd true but Supreme Court can declare law unconstitutional

    • @Dan-di9jd
      @Dan-di9jd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@suzannecrain2524 depends if it violates a constitutional right but generally speaking a bump stock is accessory so it be hard to defend that you have a constitutional right to owning it unless it’s a common item that’s in all firearms.

  • @peterparker3862
    @peterparker3862 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Too late fools. I already stocked up. Lol

  • @TheFlwildman
    @TheFlwildman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SO BASICALLY, FK the SUPREME COURT. We will do what ever the hell we want. And apparently there is little that can be done to stop these "Traitors?".

  • @Chichochonglong
    @Chichochonglong 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    FJB! TRUMP 2024!

    • @danielfilmsnyc
      @danielfilmsnyc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He’s such a fake Jew. Who ever votes for him just know he doesn’t care if Jews get killed

  • @shade38211
    @shade38211 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    One of many weapons in that hotel. Gimmic that hardly anyone has.

    • @rowyourboat5361
      @rowyourboat5361 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WRONG BUDDY. all kinds of crazies have them and want them. the police departments across our country have also issued statements saying this endangers the lives of police.

    • @timg185
      @timg185 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rowyourboat5361even if your right. These can easily be made at home. You can accomplish the same thing with a belt.

    • @markdavis-oi6om
      @markdavis-oi6om 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rowyourboat5361 The average police is a very stupid person.

    • @rowyourboat5361
      @rowyourboat5361 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markdavis-oi6om aren't you a gem. hope you never need the police.

    • @PDIcomics
      @PDIcomics 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He could have easily killed more than fifty people without a bump stock. He had twelve semi-auto rifles in his hotel room. If he had looked down a scope and aimed carefully for torsos over and over again, more people would have been dead.
      And if I concede your belief that full auto would be useful for killing more in some situations, he could have just drilled the third hole to make the AR fire real full auto. Bump stock ban does NOTHING.

  • @mygunisinnocent8028
    @mygunisinnocent8028 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Vote out the Dems before we lose our 2nd amendment

  • @markdavis-oi6om
    @markdavis-oi6om 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Nobody wants a Bumpstocks. We want full auto.

  • @anthonythomas1504
    @anthonythomas1504 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hilarious irony.

  • @cbryington
    @cbryington 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Way past time for you to be gone

  • @Mitch218
    @Mitch218 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    FJB 😂😂😂

  • @STHHCalebBrewster
    @STHHCalebBrewster 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Lol las vegas wasn't a bump stock it was a fully auto m240b. Government issue. 😂

    • @richardharris4162
      @richardharris4162 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      was fake, psyop, hoax, with sound effects

    • @markdavis-oi6om
      @markdavis-oi6om 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      None of that is true.

    • @STHHCalebBrewster
      @STHHCalebBrewster 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markdavis-oi6om according to numerous special operations veterans and people who have thousands of rounds through a GI m240B. The audio has been analyzed by their people. What's not true at all is that a bump stock was used with a 556 chambered rifle. 556 doesn't make a report like the audio in the Vegas shooting. Many veterans have pointed out it was most definitely not an AR platform. Yet a GI Fully automatic MG. Which you have to have a FEDERAL LICENSE to own. And nobody with the 30-40k that an actual MG costs, is murdering anyone.

    • @STHHCalebBrewster
      @STHHCalebBrewster 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richardharris4162 nah man there were people on the ground who literally reported hearing fully auto 308 being fired. Once someone has thousands of rounds through a gun they know the report like their favorite song. People were shot and murdered but it was a federal op. Not steven paddock

    • @markdavis-oi6om
      @markdavis-oi6om 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@STHHCalebBrewster I own two machine guns and know a bumpstock equipped firearm when I hear it. A fully automatic firearms will increase in rate of fire as the spring pressure on the cartridge decreases until the magazine is empty. That doesn’t happen with a bumpstock or a belt fed. And of course .308 sounds much more powerful than a .223.

  • @michaeltomaszewski937
    @michaeltomaszewski937 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tell the truth, they did not declare bump stocks are or arenot machine guns. They did, however, say that the ATFE did over step its aauthority to maake thiis rule.

  • @MD-mm1zv
    @MD-mm1zv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Because this is the MOST important thing the country faces…

  • @patrickh9937
    @patrickh9937 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is much easier to do than getting control of his red paint happy Frankenstein's Monster that's running amok.

  • @farmgirl6866
    @farmgirl6866 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Chucky how was Little St James Island.
    Screenshots Taken

  • @MonkaS-eu6wm
    @MonkaS-eu6wm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A waste of time and taxpayer money. Speaker Johnson won't bring this bill up for debate and the fillibuster will have this bill DOA even if he did. Not to mention they would probably have to ammend the definition of a Machinegun as defined in the Gun Control Act since it would directly conflict with whatever conflated new definition they hack up in this new bill.

    • @PDIcomics
      @PDIcomics 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He could have easily killed more than fifty people without a bump stock. He had twelve semi-auto rifles in his hotel room. If he had looked down a scope and aimed carefully for torsos over and over again, more people would have been dead.
      And if I concede your belief that full auto would be useful for killing more in some situations, he could have just drilled the third hole to make the AR fire real full auto. Bump stock ban does NOTHING.

  • @leepyper939
    @leepyper939 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Term Limits!

  • @leannthomas2103
    @leannthomas2103 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MOMS DEMAND
    2-A
    GUN RIGHTS !

  • @rogerm3708
    @rogerm3708 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about a ban on him serving raw hamburgers on Fathers Day?

  • @richardharris4162
    @richardharris4162 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bump stocks can actually fire tens of thousands of rounds per min.

  • @BigJim-wj4xr
    @BigJim-wj4xr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Schumer should visit the southern border