Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place."
Ive been hearing this so much now, that religion limits the spirit that people are super spiritual and love jesus but denny religion. That Jesus never created a religion etc thank you for sharing this video as a convert from atheism it’s difficult to understand.
I do not advice anyone to play with spirits. This is not a device to contract souls in Heaven. This is not a device to consult spirits or a toll for verification of the word of God.
And the devil👿 said to him, "To you I will give their glory and all this authority; for it has been given over to me, and I give it to anyone I please. If you, then, will worship me, it will all be yours."
Some guy in a funny robe, who calls himself, "father," (contrary to the scriptures), speaks of the catholic Jesus (who is unknown to the scriptures), calls Luther's teaching a "gospel," is friends with Methodist and Presbyterian preachers (both quite liberal, go figure), and then talks about how catholics are not taught a faith AND works-based salvation..... Really? When we can read the historic position of the vatican and its lackeys, and someone like this comes along trying to say, "No, no. That's not what we believe." Come on!
You must become a traditional Catholic, reject the antipopes, reject the Vatican II sect, reject the new mass and the new rite of ordination, to be a true Catholic. Vaticancatholic. Com proves this.
@@user-fb2jb3gz1d Look, you. He clearly painted his time with the protestant preacher friend of his as "ecumenical." Some people consider that a good term, many do not. It's a term that expresses compromise to the extent that, were the Light to be one of the two parties, would be mixed with Dark. They don't mix. When two Darknesses meet, the mix is valid. Additionally, this guy plays word games to try and veil the historic teachings of the the RCC. They are out there for all to read. The idea that we would need some guy with the title from his religion of "priest" to interpret all those teachings we can read for ourselves, no. It's an exercise in futility. The abject paganism within roman catholic teaching and practice is glaringly obvious and verifiable through many historic proofs. The fact that there are those who refuse to make the effort to go out and see it all for themselves does not place upon me the weight of responsibility to prove it all to them. It is what it is, and those who are too lazy to go out and seek the truth for themselves, they shoulder the responsibility for where they ultimately end up in eternity. I point to the Light, and when they refuse the Light and to seek it out, their blood is upon their own heads.
@@musicinspire1745 I understand, I do see corruption but paganism? The Catholic Church only worships 1 God, not many. Though I can see how someone who is ignorant of the Catholic doctrine, may misinterpret the Catholic practices. "The abject paganism within Roman Catholic teaching and practice is glaringly obvious and veritable through many historic proofs." This is a direct quote You then say that you won't explain yourself of your claim because people should not be lazy, and do the research, themselves. I agree with you, that people need to do the research for themselves. But I do give examples and explainations, to those who ask, because some people just need a bit more detail. I'm very aware of corruption in the RCC. I do not deny that. But I have skepticism about your claim, which I quoted. I am a more traditional Roman Catholic, so there are things I don't agree with. But I find that when someone says the RCC teaching is paganism, I tend to ask why, to give an example of why, and then I correct their false claim. If it is about corruption in the church, that's one thing. But about the RCC doctrine, teaching......that is another. So I ask you..... Please, give me an example of why you claim what you have stated. Please allow me to have something, exact, to research on. Be fair and honest, that is all I ask. Help shed the "Light" on my skepticism.
Thank you so much Father! God bless you for helping me to love and serve.
Your homily from the heart! Thank you Father- it’s inspiring.
Viva Cristo Rey!! Father, you give amazing Homilies--thank you! God Bless you!
The new mass is not Catholic, the Vatican II sect is not Catholic. Francis is not pope, but an antipope.
Vaticancatholic. Com proves this
Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place."
Thank you 🎄
Miss you father wish you still posted on YT
Ive been hearing this so much now, that religion limits the spirit that people are super spiritual and love jesus but denny religion. That Jesus never created a religion etc thank you for sharing this video as a convert from atheism it’s difficult to understand.
Father what is a unprovided death?
Your all for religion that gives you power over them . Power now hell later .
I do not advice anyone to play with spirits. This is not a device to contract souls in Heaven. This is not a device to consult spirits or a toll for verification of the word of God.
"Jesus was a religious Jew."
so how does this has 2 do wit christianity then..sounds rather contradictive 2 me no disrepsect intended
And the devil👿 said to him, "To you I will give their glory and all this authority; for it has been given over to me, and I give it to anyone I please. If you, then, will worship me, it will all be yours."
For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.
Some guy in a funny robe, who calls himself, "father," (contrary to the scriptures), speaks of the catholic Jesus (who is unknown to the scriptures), calls Luther's teaching a "gospel," is friends with Methodist and Presbyterian preachers (both quite liberal, go figure), and then talks about how catholics are not taught a faith AND works-based salvation..... Really? When we can read the historic position of the vatican and its lackeys, and someone like this comes along trying to say, "No, no. That's not what we believe." Come on!
You must become a traditional Catholic, reject the antipopes, reject the Vatican II sect, reject the new mass and the new rite of ordination, to be a true Catholic.
Vaticancatholic. Com proves this.
Faith without works is a dead faith
Musicinspire
4:08 in the video...... watch it
You obviously didn't pay attention
@@user-fb2jb3gz1d Look, you. He clearly painted his time with the protestant preacher friend of his as "ecumenical." Some people consider that a good term, many do not. It's a term that expresses compromise to the extent that, were the Light to be one of the two parties, would be mixed with Dark. They don't mix. When two Darknesses meet, the mix is valid.
Additionally, this guy plays word games to try and veil the historic teachings of the the RCC. They are out there for all to read. The idea that we would need some guy with the title from his religion of "priest" to interpret all those teachings we can read for ourselves, no. It's an exercise in futility. The abject paganism within roman catholic teaching and practice is glaringly obvious and verifiable through many historic proofs. The fact that there are those who refuse to make the effort to go out and see it all for themselves does not place upon me the weight of responsibility to prove it all to them. It is what it is, and those who are too lazy to go out and seek the truth for themselves, they shoulder the responsibility for where they ultimately end up in eternity. I point to the Light, and when they refuse the Light and to seek it out, their blood is upon their own heads.
@@musicinspire1745 I understand, I do see corruption but paganism?
The Catholic Church only worships 1 God, not many. Though I can see how someone who is ignorant of the Catholic doctrine, may misinterpret the Catholic practices.
"The abject paganism within Roman Catholic teaching and practice is glaringly obvious and veritable through many historic proofs."
This is a direct quote
You then say that you won't explain yourself of your claim because people should not be lazy, and do the research, themselves.
I agree with you, that people need to do the research for themselves. But I do give examples and explainations, to those who ask, because some people just need a bit more detail.
I'm very aware of corruption in the RCC. I do not deny that. But I have skepticism about your claim, which I quoted.
I am a more traditional Roman Catholic, so there are things I don't agree with. But I find that when someone says the RCC teaching is paganism, I tend to ask why, to give an example of why, and then I correct their false claim. If it is about corruption in the church, that's one thing. But about the RCC doctrine, teaching......that is another.
So I ask you.....
Please, give me an example of why you claim what you have stated.
Please allow me to have something, exact, to research on.
Be fair and honest, that is all I ask. Help shed the "Light" on my skepticism.