Flash graphene

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ม.ค. 2020
  • Scientists at Rice University are using high-energy pulses of electricity to turn any source of carbon into turbostratic graphene in an instant. The process promises environmental benefits by turning waste into valuable graphene that can then strengthen concrete and other composite materials. Read about the project at news.rice.edu/2020/01/27/rice-...

ความคิดเห็น • 190

  • @Rockool52
    @Rockool52 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Some of the gases produced can also be captured and used as they are also valuable products!

  • @beautifulsmall
    @beautifulsmall 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    135 comments in ten months for a major economic breakthrough, the student did great work but have you really got your best people on it now ?

  • @Rockool52
    @Rockool52 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    It could also be used to destroy toxic waste products.

    • @James-fe7wd
      @James-fe7wd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      carbon based toxic waste...

    • @PerfectTen10s
      @PerfectTen10s 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And destroy the planet and humanity as well

    • @KenJackson_US
      @KenJackson_US หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PerfectTen10s How could it possibly do that?

  • @nosegrindv4951
    @nosegrindv4951 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the handiwork of beloved James Tour and his collegues!

  • @talalzahid2241
    @talalzahid2241 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    imagine condoms made of graphene

    • @terrafirma9328
      @terrafirma9328 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🤣🤣🤣Now every woman can get fked with a black dik😂

  • @Rockool52
    @Rockool52 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Maybe one day they could dispose of all solid waste this way, What if they could mine landfills and flash the waste into valuable products. Like a Mr. Fusion in "Back to the Future".

    • @KManAbout
      @KManAbout 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes this is possible today. In fact the paper demonstrates this

    • @James-fe7wd
      @James-fe7wd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We're gonna end up with a lot of graphene! Question is how much energy is necessary to produce the end product?

    • @Butter-Milk
      @Butter-Milk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I hope this will provide incentive to clean up landfills and reduce air and water pollution. Then I hope something is invented to help clear up areas like Chernobyl quicker, seems like something we should already have.

    • @jeffersondodson
      @jeffersondodson 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is really exciting! Does anyone know if the elements that are separated from the carbon atoms have to be captured to not further greenhouse emissions?

    • @_Scarlet1
      @_Scarlet1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@James-fe7wd 200v

  • @daydream605
    @daydream605 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Either I'm physic or Google ai is starting to post the things in thinking quietly in my brain.
    Just 30 mins ago i was wondering the possibilities of graphene mixed with other materials and concrete was the thought that stuck...... Here we are..

    • @hastudio8154
      @hastudio8154 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's just algorithm patters, is how social media can predict/control behaviors... just math science haha.

    • @James-fe7wd
      @James-fe7wd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They're called composite materials, they've been around for a while.

    • @alexandredube141
      @alexandredube141 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hempcrete/graphene composite would be something I'd like to test.

    • @terrafirma9328
      @terrafirma9328 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The thoughts your thinking are not yours and not yours alone. They existed before you and your only regurgitating what youve been fed, baby bird. 😉

  • @senadgalijasevic8568
    @senadgalijasevic8568 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Ok. How do you invest into this?

    • @taconator1213
      @taconator1213 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      paul maydaynight how does this hep with investment/turning a profit off said investments?

    • @joshentheosparks7492
      @joshentheosparks7492 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@paulmaydaynight9925 I've been looking for this for 6 months, thanks!

    • @nickford5549
      @nickford5549 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Material science companies

    • @sonyvegasfxvideos
      @sonyvegasfxvideos 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I got PayPal

  • @taconator1213
    @taconator1213 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where can I buy stocks in this

  • @thecalltoreturntoyahsgarde6772
    @thecalltoreturntoyahsgarde6772 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool Content...

  • @vulvoxify
    @vulvoxify 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So how much current to scale up to make a lump of turbostratic graphite the size of a basketball?

  • @Adam-ic4nr
    @Adam-ic4nr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Three years in and less than 200 comments and no way to invest in this company. Something doesn't add up.

  • @TalonSilvercloud
    @TalonSilvercloud 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Okay, here me out.
    Flash Graphene production. What if you were to use the 200 volt current in a highly precise manner? Additive manufacturing AKA 3D printing.
    Could this same heat requirements be 'flashed' with a laser for even greater precision?

    • @matthewhopkins7042
      @matthewhopkins7042 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No.

    • @hugofolpp1753
      @hugofolpp1753 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a great idea. I'm not sure it would work though. You could probably form very imprecise basic shapes, but nothing all that precise due to 2 reasons.
      1. The produced graphene is a powder, I doubt you'd yield a solid 3D shape, rather a pile of graphene powder in a specific shape
      2. In the reaction, the byproduct gases would create an immense high pressure region in the newly reformed/reforming graphene, which would shoot out in all directions, sweeping up graphene powder with it. In the tube set up Rice University outlines, this isn't really an issue, as the gas is vented out the ends and the bulk of the graphene is contained. But in an open set up like you describe, that graphene powder would be free to shoot out in all directions all over the workspace.
      I could be wrong though, I'm only a senior high school student (as of typing this), so take this with a grain of salt.

  • @uzzwalkumar253
    @uzzwalkumar253 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It just sounds too good

    • @matthewhopkins7042
      @matthewhopkins7042 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Does, sounds like bollocks. I want to see it done IRL.

    • @ericliu5491
      @ericliu5491 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s scientifically proven to work.

  • @adamaam2995
    @adamaam2995 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possable to use conductive material like graphite between the two electrods gap or it must be a non conductive carbon?

    • @hugofolpp1753
      @hugofolpp1753 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wouldn't know for sure, (I'm no professional yet). But I doubt it would work with conductive carbon. Because flash graphene utilises resistive heating to produce the immense flash of heat.
      Resistive heating only really occurs when electricity travels through insulators. If the electricity travelled through something conductive (like graphite), there would be a smidgen of heat generated due to the miniscule resistance of graphite, but nowhere near enough to obliterate the graphite's molecular bonds, meaning graphene couldn't be produced.

  • @HergerTheJoyous
    @HergerTheJoyous 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I need to figure out how to diy this process!

    • @danieldurand9595
      @danieldurand9595 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Let me know when you figure it out

    • @Luda_chris
      @Luda_chris 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Honestly it doesn't seem like a very complicated process. All you really need is electrodes (i.e. copper) and 200v. Seems easy enough. I'll attempt to diy it myself this month.

    • @HergerTheJoyous
      @HergerTheJoyous 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Luda_chris Good luck! I'm right there with you!

    • @danieldurand9595
      @danieldurand9595 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Please document it fellas

    • @cayrex
      @cayrex 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Luda_chris correct,... two electrodes in between a carbon material (carbon black) and 200V. The power is applied in pulses.

  • @jarenhudson9794
    @jarenhudson9794 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is their any patents to read on this? Or has this been left largely as an "open-source" type idea? I'd really like to experiment with it - if I can do so without getting whacked on it later. More so on electronics/power storage side of things rather than industrial additives.
    Welcome any knowledge folks may have!

    • @jimneythecricket4725
      @jimneythecricket4725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Read the paper on this first and yes, they do have a patent. But I'm not sure that means you can't get to work for personal experiments. Did you ever try anything?

  • @-robo-
    @-robo- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can graphite be used in this process? (I think so, but would like confirmation please.)

    • @Rem_NL
      @Rem_NL ปีที่แล้ว

      you would need carbon

    • @hugofolpp1753
      @hugofolpp1753 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wouldn't know for sure, (I'm no professional yet). But I doubt it would work with conductive carbon (i.e. graphite) . Because flash graphene utilises resistive heating to produce the immense flash of heat.
      Resistive heating only really occurs when electricity travels through insulators. If the electricity travelled through something conductive (like graphite), there would be a smidgen of heat generated due to the miniscule resistance of graphite, but nowhere near enough to obliterate the graphite's molecular bonds, meaning graphene couldn't be produced.

  • @Technodude255
    @Technodude255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm designing robots to scale this technology up! I don't care if i have to create a company to do it!

  • @roninbadger7750
    @roninbadger7750 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    have you tried Gases? Burn Coal to generate power, Capture the off Gas and Flash the CO/CO2 for Graphene? Or a bio reactor(making fertilizer and power) harvest methane, flash the methane?

    • @andrewkaiser7203
      @andrewkaiser7203 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Take a look at Graphene Manufacturing Group. I think you'll find them interesting. * Fair disclosure: I did invest there, and I'm not hiding that. Their lubricants are JUST hitting the market.

  • @blainevans7047
    @blainevans7047 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m assuming you have to take your feedstock to the micron level to do this

    • @wessonsmithjr.6257
      @wessonsmithjr.6257 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No.

    • @blainevans7047
      @blainevans7047 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was talking about the testing, I figured it would create a more uniform result

  • @bigboy4006
    @bigboy4006 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not to be gross, but couldn't we use this on raw sewage?

    • @clarke762
      @clarke762 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah and I’d also assume you could buy trash from the dump.

  • @ytrew9717
    @ytrew9717 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    the flash doesn't produce any gas?
    EDIT: it "emits all noncarbon elements as gas."

    • @KManAbout
      @KManAbout 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Water vaper

    • @James-fe7wd
      @James-fe7wd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KManAbout water, sulfur, cyanide... whatever's in there I take it

  • @soukainaismaili9924
    @soukainaismaili9924 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Comment je peux avoir cet appareil qui tranforme les déchets en Graphène?

    • @alexandredube141
      @alexandredube141 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Un tube de verre, des électrodes et une banque de capaciteurs avec une "gate" de 5ms. Nighthawkinlight en a fait une demonstration avec son prototype DIY perso.

  • @Jeff1995born
    @Jeff1995born 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is turbostratic graphene in a powder form or like a sheet of paper?

    • @JJs_playground
      @JJs_playground ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Powder form as i understand it from another video i watched about this.

  • @casinoroyal93
    @casinoroyal93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm kimda worried by the use of large quantities of graphene in industrial products and his effects on the human body. Is there any research paper on the matter?

    • @hunde2430
      @hunde2430 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, somehow humans would digest industrial products on a daily basis

    • @Typical.Anomaly
      @Typical.Anomaly 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pure carbon isn't harmful to (most?) life on Earth

    • @terrafirma9328
      @terrafirma9328 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ignorant fool, it happens daily from food processing plants to markets

    • @Rem_NL
      @Rem_NL ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Typical.Anomaly graphene might not be toxic, but it can destroy the cell walls due to its shape

  • @wessonsmithjr.6257
    @wessonsmithjr.6257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Here is the DIY process, including, materials used. static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-020-1938-0/MediaObjects/41586_2020_1938_MOESM1_ESM.docx

    • @asterlofts1565
      @asterlofts1565 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks sir.

    • @DSVETLOV
      @DSVETLOV ปีที่แล้ว

      присоединяюсь к благодарностям

  • @ytrew9717
    @ytrew9717 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    And what about other element in those waste (eg. those in coals) what's happens to them?

    • @blainevans7047
      @blainevans7047 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ytrew there would need to be additional processes but some would “ablate” and others could be collected

    • @ytrew9717
      @ytrew9717 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blainevans7047 "ablate"? Do you mean evaporate?

    • @blainevans7047
      @blainevans7047 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ytrew look up laser ablation aircraft sorry I just fought that...laser ablation can reach 25000F

    • @KManAbout
      @KManAbout 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Coal is just carbon so nothing

    • @blainevans7047
      @blainevans7047 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The K are you trolling? Coal is mostly carbon...but there are many assemblies and MANY other elements

  • @SouthernHerdsman
    @SouthernHerdsman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow.

  • @spoileralert3754
    @spoileralert3754 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe you can answer. How much graphene is in one kilo of graphite?

  • @ronespindola94
    @ronespindola94 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it similar to plasma pyrolysis?

    • @matthewhopkins7042
      @matthewhopkins7042 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah - I reckon this would make ash not graphene. Or in this case charcoal given there's no oxygen.

    • @ericliu5491
      @ericliu5491 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You clearly did not watch the video.

  • @JacobMerrill
    @JacobMerrill 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can imagine a 'sprayer' that powder coats stuff / with graphene created on the fly

  • @user-gd2qx3jc7g
    @user-gd2qx3jc7g 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    please tell me fg dissolves in ordinary water?

    • @hugofolpp1753
      @hugofolpp1753 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty sure it doesn't. It's quite insoluble as far as i'm aware

    • @KenJackson_US
      @KenJackson_US หลายเดือนก่อน

      It wouldn't be valuable as a building material if it dissolved.

  • @mrich2164
    @mrich2164 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you make graphene from air?

    • @hastudio8154
      @hastudio8154 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a very good question! That would be the 5G of graphene I guess

    • @cayrex
      @cayrex 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      From CO2 maybe

    • @theflyingwelshman5338
      @theflyingwelshman5338 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Potentially. Carbon capture technology is currently in development to draw carbon dioxide out of the air and convert it into either pure carbon, or even hydrocarbons like gasoline and kerosene. Using carbon capture tech and this new graphene production process could let us literally make graphene out of thin air.

  • @mattman8685
    @mattman8685 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have but one question. What else can we transform by moving matter with electricity. This is the tip of a world saving iceburg

    • @theflyingwelshman5338
      @theflyingwelshman5338 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed. Maybe it could revert metal oxides back into metals.

    • @terrafirma9328
      @terrafirma9328 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      2 birds 1 stone. Solve global climate change by turning co2 into graohene

    • @hugofolpp1753
      @hugofolpp1753 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theflyingwelshman5338 Yes, that's how aluminium is refined commercially. That's one of two ways green steel is made. I believe copper is refined this way, and *maybe* gold too

    • @theflyingwelshman5338
      @theflyingwelshman5338 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hugofolpp1753 the problem is that they use carbon electrodes, which degrade and produce carbon dioxide.

  • @pkillor
    @pkillor 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It would be great if it could work using The Kelvin water dropper,
    imagine water and gravity making graphene out of rubbish.

  • @crafter2u
    @crafter2u 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    a year old and still not mass producing it

  • @brade.1445
    @brade.1445 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    OK I know where there's a supply of 70 billion metric tonnes a year, if that can be handled :-)

  • @joyyan866
    @joyyan866 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Look at the graphene structure, 6 points, 6 lines, and many of these sixes. That's the mark of the beast 666. Also what can cause pain (Revelation 16:10) and “a noisome and grievous sore” (Revelation 16:2)? Only something medicinal can cause these. Not a chip implant. Also human body is 18% carbon. So therefore "a man's number" is also 666. (Revelation 13:18)“The sun shall be turned into darkness, And the moon into blood, Before that great and notable Day of the Lord come: And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.”
    --Acts‬ ‭2:20-21‬

  • @Buzzhumma
    @Buzzhumma 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i think its more like 2 million watts!

    • @cayrex
      @cayrex 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think 200V are fairly realistic, but will take some amount of amps. This is similar if you connect two carbon rods to 12V battery and then you put this two carbon electrodes together,... you get strong flash. But here is used way higher voltage and also the power is applied in pulses. The carbon material is between two electrodes.

    • @Buzzhumma
      @Buzzhumma 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      cayrex2 yes actually under vaccum spark gaps can be made significantly wider! 2 million watts?

    • @cayrex
      @cayrex 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Buzzhumma do you think that the carbon material is in the vaccum? On the other hand makes sense.

    • @cayrex
      @cayrex 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Buzzhumma in this method they uses high heat to break the layers of carbon. High heat and then cool down,.... thats why they make pulses. If you play with two carbon rods and a battery,... you also create really high heat.

    • @Buzzhumma
      @Buzzhumma 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      cayrex2 yes for sure. And that also allow them to capture the gases formed ! Like a crt tv monitor . It is under vacumm to allow the electrons to easily pass to the front phosphorous glass !