Getting sick of hearing Gerrard carried us for so long. It’s so disrespectful to legends of the game like Djimi Traore, Albert Riera, David N’Gog, Paul Konchesky and Andriy Voronin
Chelsea fan since 96, Steven Gerrard wins this one easily for me. If players swapped clubs during their playing time then Liverpool would have been a lot worse off. Gerrard took so many games by the scruff of the neck and you could argue he's defensive game is better and he was a stronger captain. Both could pass, finish, create and take set peices. Lamaprd arguably had the better technique, but Gerrard's overall game was stronger and he influenced games where Liverpool had no right winning.
Gerrard was immense. He carried Liverpool, a match winner and could play in almost any position. He scored worldies, decent header, tackle, free kick specialist, great pen taker, strength, power and speed - he had the lot! By far and away the most versatile midfielder in English football. One of the all time greats!
Carried Liverpool to where? A couple title challenges in 15 years?? Don’t forget he was shifted out of position because BETTER midfielders like Xabi Alonso and Mascherano were at the club and they went on to win it all.. “All time great”.. Name another “all time great” who won almost nothing.. Gerrard ain’t some special dude, the best players win things..
@@Primitive01he won every major trophy but the prem at club level, while scoring in every major final, the only British player in history to do so last time I looked. He has an fa cup final officially named after him….. one of only two players in over 125 years off fa cup history to do so 🤷♂️
@Primitive01 oh gawd, keep your head buried in the sand. You clearly dislike Gerrard so intentionally overlook his abilities as a player. Keep ignoring what he'd achieved, that won't change history. 🥱
You can settle any debate regarding Gerrard vs Scholes, Lampard etc by listing what Gerrard could do on the pitch. He could do EVERYTHING well. That includes being one of the best leaders. He had no weaknesses. That is why Mourinho and Ferguson among others so desperately wanted him in their teams. This isn't degrading other great midfielders but Gerrard could play ANY outfield position on the pitch to a decent level. How many players of any era could do that?
Gerrard is in my World XI since the start of the Premier League era, the complete midfielder, ask him to do any role and it would be done to a world class level.
I’ve been an Everton fan for 30 years I’ve watched all these 3 careers from start to finish an in my opinion gerrard was the best midfielder I’ve ever seen hurts to say it but he was the best of the best and I hate him for it the other two are world class but gerrard was the pinnacle
Only player to score and go onto win in an fa cup, league Cup, euefa cup and champions league final. Total big game player, best midfielder of that era in England, only Zidane and iniesta above him in that generation. Gerrard!
Gerrard all day long no contest. Those of us that were there to witness, you can sing until the cows come home about Scholes or Lampard depending on which colour you wear and that music just fades into the background when Gerrard is brought into the conversation. The best midfielder I have ever seen, no one comes close.
Premier League players who faced all three the most times and have the most skin in the game almost exclusively pick Gerrard. As do most Premier League pundits who have had to watch all three for most of it not all of their careers.
I fuc''n love so much Kevs, I love so much watching him play...that white kit wit Reebok name on...Always propper! Great player, fighter and character!
Agree with his picks and why he picked them. Scholes was so intelligent but there was a period before messi and ronaldo where gerrard was possibly worlds best. Madrid that great milan team and fergie, jose at chelsea all tried to buy him for a reason
For you….. not for the players who voted for team of year or bal n dors…. He was in so many more than scholes!! Also all england managers played gerrard before scholes Fergie wanted to buy gerrard, jose wanted to by gerrard, ancelotti wanted to buy him.
Yeah. 2007-09-ish he was the best in the world, until Messi and Ronaldo took things to a new never-before-seen level. Lampard and Scholes were sensational players too, no doubt about it. Impossible not to appreciate them, regardless of what team you support.
If you really watch football it's not a debate Scholes was levels above anything in England he actually controlled the game . Gerrard good player but all blood and energy didn't have the discipline or football iq of Scholes. That's why Scholes is more appreciated by world football not British passport . I watched both players and honestly Scholes is underrated
Lampard and Scholes had similarities to Gerrard but they still were about 40% of what he was on the field, folks team bias will never see that though....
His goals and assists and all sorts of numbers would have been insane if he had played for one of the giants at the time. Man Utd, Chelsea, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern... This is why I always say that people easily get blinded by players who play for the giants, where their working conditions are perfect, as opposed to those who walk the path of more resistance. Liverpool, at the time, was a sleeping giant, and he often carried them. Tough luck for him. His entire career played in the void between the 80s and Klopp. Periodically an "almost-team", largely due to him, but usually missing that little bit extra.
All top footballers. Only one could play at the top level and be the best player on the park at 6,8,10 right wing and right back - even in a Champs League final
Anyone sensible would pick Stevie.. At his prime he could get into pretty much all of world's top clubs at that time, the likes of Milan, Madrid, Barca, Bayern.. Lampard and Scholes can only dream of it !
Gerrard all day long had everything over 100 prem goals playing in the positions he played in scored all types of goals pace never stopped running won numerous trophies single handed in some average Liverpool teams Scholes and Lampard played in some great teams sorry no debate on this he would be first name on everybody’s team sheet both Ferguson and Jose wanted him as well
They said Lampard's goal record was ridiculous. For England he only scored 29 goals in 106 appearences. David Platt scored 27 in 62 appearences and played in a deeper position.
"HE COULD PLAY EVERYWHERE" lol. I remember they had the same arguement here on talksport when they debated if Rooney was a better player than Messi. And btw Gerrards best performences came from the right under Benitez (?) npt as a centre mid.
2:07 I can still remember the moment when stevie g appeared to stomp at Nolan. For anybody who watches the epl games back in mid 2000s know that its not because stevie g is a nasty player. Its one heat of the moment and retaliation during physical battles vs Bolton when Kevin Davies and kevin nolan throwing elbows and stuffs. They played way too over physical and its the mindset of every players ahead of facing bolton - you've got to be ready for this physical battle. Its just like going to a war when playing with bolton
Lampard and Scholes were fantastic players but they were always in great teams. If you put either of them in the Liverpool team then they wouldn't have won much at all.
Paul Scholes was the best - as proved by his SIX (?) PL Medals versus Gerrards' NONE. I applaud SG for staying loyal to LFC, but PS was a better footballer - IMO.
Scholes could easily fit into peps barca team he was on that level . Gerrard was only suitable for english football with passion and energy . Thats why scholes is no 1 hes the English zavi . Unfortunately like hoddle england to set in their ways to accommodate their best player .
Where would Scholes play at Barca ? Stop it he was a long ball merchant , with woeful defensive awareness ...Veron was far superior to him in all aspects of the game tbh . Fabregas ,Xabi Alonso, David Silva fit the Barca team even Al Cantara but Schoulsey 😆😆😆 maybe Real Madrid
Liverpool did a mistake letting him go. They should have put him in central defence. He could've played central defence with a bigger centre-half besides him.
Albert riera was brill too Mentaly Thats what rafa wanted to build early days In liverpool fc those days Although A.riera was at the ending of rafa reign at liverpool fc
No other manager ever will come close to Juergen not even pep Juergen is better then pep and all other manager will never be half as good as Juergen not even pep is millions miles behind Juergen just by counting the champion league final 3time is enough to leave pep milion miles behind get this in your thick brain you can chat bull as long as all of you want kip barking it I’ll never effects Liverpool so keep barking
Liverpool in 2005 was a joke of a top club, but gerrard drove them to champions league, off course with a little help by there fans, who were buzzing that year. Liverpool in 2005 were just a rubbish team, but gerrard drove them to that champions league, and just never let them give up. With such players and right fans, you should win Scholes, was not like that, neither was lampard Gerrard was englands version of lothar matthaus, but for england, gerrard did not have the right fans. Gerrard like roy keane could of played for any team in europe. Roy keane did same for man utd, but off course roy had far better team of players to play with at man utd. Roy keane drove man utd to champions league in 1999, and gerrard did it for liverpool in 2005. If you have those players you should win, and if you do not, you do not have right players around them, or right fans. Its why in one moment roy keane rubbished man utd fans Gerrard never had to rubbish liverpool fans, gerrard just did not have the right players around him, like roy keane did.
Liverpool fan picks liberpool player. Not even listening to this. End of the day lampard influential in more big game than any cm in history. Probably the best ever in terms of cause and efect on a football match. And the hardest working on and off the ball Most ground covered of all the top fellas Opinions are worthless. Everyone has one. He was good enough to play about thirty games for city when he was a pensioner. And spent five seasons at west ham. The myth he was in better side ia only true for half their careers. He was a pre mourinhio Chelsea signing
He didn’t play cm though did he lol. He played second striker, what’s commonly known as the 10 role today. He played behind drogba…. Gerrard played a similar role behind Torres for a couple of seasons and has similar numbers in that role, scholes played behind sheringham and has similar numbers. He also played international football in the same position yet never even scored a goal for England at any major international tournament 😂
Gerrard 100% effort 5 % football IQ . Thats why scholes has 11 pl titles the best midfielders control the game . Scholes was appreciated more abroad but England like push n run footballers like Gerrard all passion zero intelligence
😂😂😂 funniest bit of dribble I’ve read for a while, scholes iq is why he has 11 league titles yeah sure mate I’m sure having players like cantona, giggs, Cole, York, Keane, becks, Rio, staam, schmichael, CR etc had nothing to do with winning the league scholes iq was it
And the heartbeat of the most successful team of his era. He should have been the player the England team was built around, he would have made that team tick. Gerrard and lampard could have played off him, and they would have been more successful internationals because of it.
Pep hates gerrard. Gerrard destroyed him against Barcelona when thet played against each other and then laughed in his face! Sure last year pep had a dig at gerrard in a press conference. Hates him. Most players who played aginst gerrard, scholes and lampard pick gerrard. Sure he has more player or the months, was in tge most team of the year and thats picked by players. Also in more top 10 bal n dor which is picked by players so who cares about pep
@@sufamidan1006 that's very true. Many of them do. Personally, I think I agree with Nolan. Lampard was the least special of the 3, even though his stats were somehow the most special, and credit to him. But Scholes was a genius, and Gerrard was beast of a player, and the one that stood out the most to me, as a United fan who used to play CM in school.
@su incorrect. Tge players who olayed against them vote for player of the season and team of the year. Gerrard in it a record number of times!!! Also more top 10 bal n dor votes which is also voted by players too. No idea where you got that statement fron but its false
Carrick too , Beckham did all the play making for Yanited too😆 when was Scholes the best United player ? Wayne Rooney picked Stevie with the quickness@@D.L91
So the argument is that Gerrard is better because he played in a rubbish team? I guess that makes Gerrard better than Xavi, Iniesta, Zidane, Pirlo, Kaka, Seedorf etc. So the best midfielder in football history. Nonsense. Give Lampard and Scholes their props
It's not an argument Gerrard was the immense and the best from them 3. Picked in world IXs, which the other two were not. But I see haters will pick stupid things to argue over😂
@dakopper77 Did you read my comment, or you just showed up to be emotional? People give Gerrard high praise by saying Scholes and Lampard played in great teams so they couldn't have been as good as Gerrard. So should the qualities of all the great midfielders I mentioned be diminished aswell since they also played in great teams
@@commentator88 emotional 😂 aww that's cute flower. My point is that you've picked a 5% argument point and tried to base your whole argument on it. So I simply stated Gerrard is greater and a follow up fact. Here I'll give you an example as to why your comments flawed..replace Gerrard in the Liverpool team with either scholes or lamps and that Liverpool team doesn't achieve as much..hence why comments about Gerrard in not so great teams exist.
@dakopper77 I've heard that one before. Repeated narrative. How do you know Lampard and Scholes wont succeed in Liverpool... you just have that intuition do you?
@@commentator88 you have seen these players play..right?! How they'd fit with teams that consist of players with a certain type of calibre..surely that would be enough. Here, I'll make it easier for you.. Gerrard could do what scholes and lamps could but not so true vice versa. Gerrard could play different positions whether in defence or attack but the other two couldn't. You seem like someone who would deny the existence of oceans even if they were slapped in the face with tuna. Be interesting where you steer this dialogue now however 😂😂
What a surprise, the guy with the scouse accent picks Slippy G over the highest scoring midfielder in Premier League history & multiple time Premier League winner/Champions League winner Frank Lampard. Goals win games - Frank not only had the best PL goal stats in history, but he also had a plethora of amazing assists. 🥱
It's a difficult 3 to choose from. And Lampard ends up as the least special, despite the irony of him having the most special stats. Clearly all 3 were great, but testimony from their peers and rivals also has Lampard as the least amazing of the 3 from his praise.
A large majority of players who played against them all picked gerrard. He is in the team of the year a record number of times and thats picked by the players!!!!! Nothing to do with him being scouse
Getting sick of hearing Gerrard carried us for so long. It’s so disrespectful to legends of the game like Djimi Traore, Albert Riera, David N’Gog, Paul Konchesky and Andriy Voronin
Lolol
Who r they?
Sinama Pongolle
🤣
😂
Chelsea fan since 96, Steven Gerrard wins this one easily for me. If players swapped clubs during their playing time then Liverpool would have been a lot worse off. Gerrard took so many games by the scruff of the neck and you could argue he's defensive game is better and he was a stronger captain. Both could pass, finish, create and take set peices. Lamaprd arguably had the better technique, but Gerrard's overall game was stronger and he influenced games where Liverpool had no right winning.
Gerrard was immense. He carried Liverpool, a match winner and could play in almost any position. He scored worldies, decent header, tackle, free kick specialist, great pen taker, strength, power and speed - he had the lot! By far and away the most versatile midfielder in English football. One of the all time greats!
Carried Liverpool to where? A couple title challenges in 15 years??
Don’t forget he was shifted out of position because BETTER midfielders like Xabi Alonso and Mascherano were at the club and they went on to win it all..
“All time great”.. Name another “all time great” who won almost nothing.. Gerrard ain’t some special dude, the best players win things..
@@Primitive01he won every major trophy but the prem at club level, while scoring in every major final, the only British player in history to do so last time I looked. He has an fa cup final officially named after him….. one of only two players in over 125 years off fa cup history to do so 🤷♂️
@Primitive01 oh gawd, keep your head buried in the sand. You clearly dislike Gerrard so intentionally overlook his abilities as a player. Keep ignoring what he'd achieved, that won't change history. 🥱
@@Primitive01That's the same reason Scholes was shifted out of position for England. Lampard and Gerrard were better players.
Everything except speed especially acceleration if he had real acceleration and pace he would have been playing for real Madrid
Alex Ferguson had Scholes but still wanted Gerrard Mourihno had Lampard but still wanted Gerrard tells you enough.
You just dont understand do you? If i have Ferrari i wont buy volkswagen.@JaiAnt-bd7xv
Gerrard got into the PFA team of the years 8 times. Says it all.
You can settle any debate regarding Gerrard vs Scholes, Lampard etc by listing what Gerrard could do on the pitch. He could do EVERYTHING well. That includes being one of the best leaders. He had no weaknesses. That is why Mourinho and Ferguson among others so desperately wanted him in their teams. This isn't degrading other great midfielders but Gerrard could play ANY outfield position on the pitch to a decent level. How many players of any era could do that?
Gerrard is in my World XI since the start of the Premier League era, the complete midfielder, ask him to do any role and it would be done to a world class level.
I’ve been an Everton fan for 30 years I’ve watched all these 3 careers from start to finish an in my opinion gerrard was the best midfielder I’ve ever seen hurts to say it but he was the best of the best and I hate him for it the other two are world class but gerrard was the pinnacle
Only player to score and go onto win in an fa cup, league Cup, euefa cup and champions league final. Total big game player, best midfielder of that era in England, only Zidane and iniesta above him in that generation. Gerrard!
Gerrard all day long no contest. Those of us that were there to witness, you can sing until the cows come home about Scholes or Lampard depending on which colour you wear and that music just fades into the background when Gerrard is brought into the conversation. The best midfielder I have ever seen, no one comes close.
Premier League players who faced all three the most times and have the most skin in the game almost exclusively pick Gerrard. As do most Premier League pundits who have had to watch all three for most of it not all of their careers.
I fuc''n love so much Kevs, I love so much watching him play...that white kit wit Reebok name on...Always propper! Great player, fighter and character!
Agree with his picks and why he picked them. Scholes was so intelligent but there was a period before messi and ronaldo where gerrard was possibly worlds best. Madrid that great milan team and fergie, jose at chelsea all tried to buy him for a reason
Never the world's best always below Scholes zavi ,iniesta for me
For you….. not for the players who voted for team of year or bal n dors…. He was in so many more than scholes!!
Also all england managers played gerrard before scholes
Fergie wanted to buy gerrard, jose wanted to by gerrard, ancelotti wanted to buy him.
Yeah. 2007-09-ish he was the best in the world, until Messi and Ronaldo took things to a new never-before-seen level. Lampard and Scholes were sensational players too, no doubt about it. Impossible not to appreciate them, regardless of what team you support.
If you really watch football it's not a debate Scholes was levels above anything in England he actually controlled the game . Gerrard good player but all blood and energy didn't have the discipline or football iq of Scholes. That's why Scholes is more appreciated by world football not British passport . I watched both players and honestly Scholes is underrated
All 3 are amazing in their own way.....but has to be Gerrard.
As a gooner ive always been shocked at how- kind of- underrated Gerrard is...
Lampard and Scholes had similarities to Gerrard but they still were about 40% of what he was on the field, folks team bias will never see that though....
His goals and assists and all sorts of numbers would have been insane if he had played for one of the giants at the time. Man Utd, Chelsea, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern... This is why I always say that people easily get blinded by players who play for the giants, where their working conditions are perfect, as opposed to those who walk the path of more resistance. Liverpool, at the time, was a sleeping giant, and he often carried them. Tough luck for him. His entire career played in the void between the 80s and Klopp. Periodically an "almost-team", largely due to him, but usually missing that little bit extra.
I'm an Arsenal fan so no bias. Id pick Gerrard but 40% is wrong. Maybe a team bias there?
All top footballers. Only one could play at the top level and be the best player on the park at 6,8,10 right wing and right back - even in a Champs League final
Lampard had no responsibility, he didn’t have to defend or track back in the Chelsea side , scholes had world class players in every position
Scholes chooses Gerrard that’s all I need to hear.
Gerrard all day long. Scholes and Lampard were both absolute World class mind…
Its not even a debate, GERRARD WAS PURE CLASS
Anyone sensible would pick Stevie.. At his prime he could get into pretty much all of world's top clubs at that time, the likes of Milan, Madrid, Barca, Bayern.. Lampard and Scholes can only dream of it !
Gerrard all day long had everything over 100 prem goals playing in the positions he played in scored all types of goals pace never stopped running won numerous trophies single handed in some average Liverpool teams Scholes and Lampard played in some great teams sorry no debate on this he would be first name on everybody’s team sheet both Ferguson and Jose wanted him as well
They said Lampard's goal record was ridiculous.
For England he only scored 29 goals in 106 appearences.
David Platt scored 27 in 62 appearences and played in a deeper position.
"HE COULD PLAY EVERYWHERE" lol. I remember they had the same arguement here on talksport when they debated if Rooney was a better player than Messi. And btw Gerrards best performences came from the right under Benitez (?) npt as a centre mid.
Not true, he was best as a 10/second striker off Torres from 2007-2010.
2:07 I can still remember the moment when stevie g appeared to stomp at Nolan. For anybody who watches the epl games back in mid 2000s know that its not because stevie g is a nasty player. Its one heat of the moment and retaliation during physical battles vs Bolton when Kevin Davies and kevin nolan throwing elbows and stuffs. They played way too over physical and its the mindset of every players ahead of facing bolton - you've got to be ready for this physical battle. Its just like going to a war when playing with bolton
Lampard and Scholes were fantastic players but they were always in great teams. If you put either of them in the Liverpool team then they wouldn't have won much at all.
How on earth can you substantiate that? If Liverpool had Scholes in the Torres era they'd have won the league.
You can't seriously believe that if scholes had been in that Istanbul team instead of Gerrard that they would have won the Cup?
Gerrard probably the best ever Prem league player
Rooneys better than gerrard
With no premier League title
They'll never understand what he was cause of their bias, they forget fergie wanted him for a long time too
He was in with a shout. Rooney, Henry, CR7 all have a stronger shout.
@@ansumanafatti93167-0 giving you ptsd😂
Ronaldo doesn't have a world cup so he can't be a legend then?!?
The audacity and class of Stevie G texting Kevin Nolan to apologize(which he didnt need to) after wht he did wrong speaks all
Kevin Nolan was a great player to be fair to him..
Paul Scholes was the best - as proved by his SIX (?) PL Medals versus Gerrards' NONE. I applaud SG for staying loyal to LFC, but PS was a better footballer - IMO.
@@JaiAnt-ui7ip Hilarious.
Scholes could easily fit into peps barca team he was on that level . Gerrard was only suitable for english football with passion and energy . Thats why scholes is no 1 hes the English zavi . Unfortunately like hoddle england to set in their ways to accommodate their best player .
Where would Scholes play at Barca ? Stop it he was a long ball merchant , with woeful defensive awareness ...Veron was far superior to him in all aspects of the game tbh . Fabregas ,Xabi Alonso, David Silva fit the Barca team even Al Cantara but Schoulsey 😆😆😆 maybe Real Madrid
Liverpool did a mistake letting him go. They should have put him in central defence. He could've played central defence with a bigger centre-half besides him.
Great this From Nolan.
I was a big mate of Gary Speed.
Always spoke highly of "Nobby" as he called him.
Albert riera was brill too
Mentaly
Thats what rafa wanted to build early days
In liverpool fc those days
Although A.riera was at the ending of rafa reign at liverpool fc
Nolan was not slouch himself
No other manager ever will come close to Juergen not even pep Juergen is better then pep and all other manager will never be half as good as Juergen not even pep is millions miles behind Juergen just by counting the champion league final 3time is enough to leave pep milion miles behind get this in your thick brain you can chat bull as long as all of you want kip barking it I’ll never effects Liverpool so keep barking
Lampard was once 2nd best player in the world, Gerrard never got to the top 3
Funny how all the pros pick gerrard isn’t it.
Lio gerrard
Is next up
We r all witing for this brill child
Sorry if this pressuring
Liverpool in 2005 was a joke of a top club, but gerrard drove them to champions league, off course with a little help by there fans, who were buzzing that year.
Liverpool in 2005 were just a rubbish team, but gerrard drove them to that champions league, and just never let them give up.
With such players and right fans, you should win
Scholes, was not like that, neither was lampard
Gerrard was englands version of lothar matthaus, but for england, gerrard did not have the right fans.
Gerrard like roy keane could of played for any team in europe.
Roy keane did same for man utd, but off course roy had far better team of players to play with at man utd.
Roy keane drove man utd to champions league in 1999, and gerrard did it for liverpool in 2005.
If you have those players you should win, and if you do not, you do not have right players around them, or right fans.
Its why in one moment roy keane rubbished man utd fans
Gerrard never had to rubbish liverpool fans, gerrard just did not have the right players around him, like roy keane did.
Barry seaman van persie Sheringham fowler van nistelrooy van Schmeichel carragher
Peter crouch and kevin davies have got more pl asists than scholes. Doesnt come near Gerrard and Lampard
Gerrard could play anywhere - even on your chest Kevin and you`ve got the stud marks to prove it.
Liverpool fan picks liberpool player. Not even listening to this. End of the day lampard influential in more big game than any cm in history. Probably the best ever in terms of cause and efect on a football match. And the hardest working on and off the ball
Most ground covered of all the top fellas
Opinions are worthless. Everyone has one. He was good enough to play about thirty games for city when he was a pensioner. And spent five seasons at west ham.
The myth he was in better side ia only true for half their careers. He was a pre mourinhio Chelsea signing
He didn’t play cm though did he lol. He played second striker, what’s commonly known as the 10 role today. He played behind drogba…. Gerrard played a similar role behind Torres for a couple of seasons and has similar numbers in that role, scholes played behind sheringham and has similar numbers. He also played international football in the same position yet never even scored a goal for England at any major international tournament 😂
And that was the problem.
He knows ball
It's scholes by a long shot foranybody with sense, just listen what other players/managers said about him,
Xabi Alonso
Scholes was zizuu of England
Bikm
Ge55ard ❤⚪️💙
Listening to these low level footballers is grating . Bent, Murphy, agbonlahor. Please add to the list.
Easy to be the stand out in a crap team
Everyone of the dog have ther day keep barking who lef the dog out
Peter crouch David seaman dion Dublin Robbie fowler Peter Schmeichel emile heskey Ryan giggs Alan shearer
Gerrard 100% effort 5 % football IQ . Thats why scholes has 11 pl titles the best midfielders control the game . Scholes was appreciated more abroad but England like push n run footballers like Gerrard all passion zero intelligence
Passing it backwards and sideways is called “controlling” when referencing scholes…… anyone else does it and they are called shite 😂
😂😂😂 funniest bit of dribble I’ve read for a while, scholes iq is why he has 11 league titles yeah sure mate I’m sure having players like cantona, giggs, Cole, York, Keane, becks, Rio, staam, schmichael, CR etc had nothing to do with winning the league scholes iq was it
Scholes for me. The guy was a wizard
And the heartbeat of the most successful team of his era. He should have been the player the England team was built around, he would have made that team tick. Gerrard and lampard could have played off him, and they would have been more successful internationals because of it.
Get a grip mate there is a reason he retired early and Gerrard was captain and first name on the team sheet for England even while Frank was playing
Pep went with Scholes. I agree with him.
Sheep
Pep hates gerrard. Gerrard destroyed him against Barcelona when thet played against each other and then laughed in his face!
Sure last year pep had a dig at gerrard in a press conference. Hates him.
Most players who played aginst gerrard, scholes and lampard pick gerrard. Sure he has more player or the months, was in tge most team of the year and thats picked by players. Also in more top 10 bal n dor which is picked by players so who cares about pep
loool cos lampard won the league on his patch.. haha
🎉
hasselbaink van nistelrooy van persie Sheringham ferdinand aubameyang berbatov Jesus Wright
Stay off the crack. Scholes stands alone. Debate the other two all you want.
Yea stands alone behind them. Most overrated player. Keane was more important for United
@@D.L91 Don’t ask me, ask the best to do it. They always pick Scholes.
@@sufamidan1006 that's very true. Many of them do. Personally, I think I agree with Nolan. Lampard was the least special of the 3, even though his stats were somehow the most special, and credit to him. But Scholes was a genius, and Gerrard was beast of a player, and the one that stood out the most to me, as a United fan who used to play CM in school.
@su incorrect. Tge players who olayed against them vote for player of the season and team of the year. Gerrard in it a record number of times!!! Also more top 10 bal n dor votes which is also voted by players too.
No idea where you got that statement fron but its false
Carrick too , Beckham did all the play making for Yanited too😆 when was Scholes the best United player ? Wayne Rooney picked Stevie with the quickness@@D.L91
With that thick scouse accent and being a boyhood Liverpool fan I was extremely shocked to hear Nolan pick Gerrard
There was a certain french player who lauded Gerrard. Gerrard was immense, you dont need a particular accent to understand that.
Gerard kept Liverpool up there with Man Utd ???
How many titles 😂😂😂
Heskey crouch fowler
speed ballack sung ince Barry essien Arteta le tissier Nolan
Couldn’t even do it in the prem with Xabi Alonso beside him
Thise two were ubreal together. Itvwas all tge otger players who were terrible
Frank lampard was the best he's assist's goalscoring and passing couldn't ask anymore
Stat merchant who knows nothing about football I see
Ferdinand
Lol, Vidic clear
@@matthewflynn6837 les ferdinand
@@matthewflynn6837 ferdinand waz a average footballer not tht good
So the argument is that Gerrard is better because he played in a rubbish team? I guess that makes Gerrard better than Xavi, Iniesta, Zidane, Pirlo, Kaka, Seedorf etc. So the best midfielder in football history. Nonsense. Give Lampard and Scholes their props
It's not an argument Gerrard was the immense and the best from them 3. Picked in world IXs, which the other two were not. But I see haters will pick stupid things to argue over😂
@dakopper77 Did you read my comment, or you just showed up to be emotional? People give Gerrard high praise by saying Scholes and Lampard played in great teams so they couldn't have been as good as Gerrard. So should the qualities of all the great midfielders I mentioned be diminished aswell since they also played in great teams
@@commentator88 emotional 😂 aww that's cute flower. My point is that you've picked a 5% argument point and tried to base your whole argument on it. So I simply stated Gerrard is greater and a follow up fact. Here I'll give you an example as to why your comments flawed..replace Gerrard in the Liverpool team with either scholes or lamps and that Liverpool team doesn't achieve as much..hence why comments about Gerrard in not so great teams exist.
@dakopper77 I've heard that one before. Repeated narrative. How do you know Lampard and Scholes wont succeed in Liverpool... you just have that intuition do you?
@@commentator88 you have seen these players play..right?! How they'd fit with teams that consist of players with a certain type of calibre..surely that would be enough.
Here, I'll make it easier for you..
Gerrard could do what scholes and lamps could but not so true vice versa. Gerrard could play different positions whether in defence or attack but the other two couldn't. You seem like someone who would deny the existence of oceans even if they were slapped in the face with tuna. Be interesting where you steer this dialogue now however 😂😂
Scholes is the greatest English midfielder of all time
Gazza Brian Robson ? Come on
Kalvin Philips , Jordan Henderson 😆@@harrygregg9551
What a surprise, the guy with the scouse accent picks Slippy G over the highest scoring midfielder in Premier League history & multiple time Premier League winner/Champions League winner Frank Lampard.
Goals win games - Frank not only had the best PL goal stats in history, but he also had a plethora of amazing assists.
🥱
It's a difficult 3 to choose from. And Lampard ends up as the least special, despite the irony of him having the most special stats. Clearly all 3 were great, but testimony from their peers and rivals also has Lampard as the least amazing of the 3 from his praise.
A large majority of players who played against them all picked gerrard.
He is in the team of the year a record number of times and thats picked by the players!!!!!
Nothing to do with him being scouse