The Mystery Of The Extraordinary Black Mummy | The Tashwinat Mummy
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025
- In 1958, an Italian archaeologist discovered the mummified remains of a two-and-a-half-year-old boy in a cave in southwestern Libya. But this was a mummy with a difference: it was far older than any comparable examples found in Egypt.
The culture that produced the mummy were cattle herders, and occupied much of North Africa, at a time when the Sahara was a savannah. Possible links with later Egyptian culture have also been found, including the representation in rock art of dog-headed human figures (resembling Anubis), and a type of pottery decoration later found in the southern Nile valley.
The mummy was destined for controversy. He was older than any comparable Egyptian mummy and his mere existence challenged the very idea that Egyptians were the first in the region to mummify their dead. Uan Muhuggiag was no one off. The sophistication of his mummification suggested he was the result of a long tradition of mummification.
The discovery raised some profound questions. Who were the ancient inhabitants of the Sahara Desert who put the mummy there? And what influence might those people have had on the glittering civilization that later emerged in the land of the pharaohs?
From the ancient civilizations of years past to the dawn of the Space Race, every week we'll be bringing you award-winning documentaries featuring some of the world's best historians. Subscribe so you don't miss out.
Real History is part of the History Hit Network.
Any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
"An unknown people"? Just say black Africans. The Egyptian didn't steal mummification from anyone. The ORIGINAL Egyptians were black Africans until outside invaders conquered.
@@rahkeemthegreat360 yeah you wish
North Africa has always been Caucasoid since the Paleolithic period
@@rednovember266 just stop it troll.
@@raidermanic872do you want the link to academic sources
@@rednovember266 please don't send me a link from anyone with the Flinders Petrie theory.
Im surprised this video isnt banned with them Saying that Egypts origin is in Africa. That's sacrilege.
They haven't seen it yet.
And what do you call these behaviors?
th-cam.com/video/Mxib_9yQRZo/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/3yxoE2l6a-Q/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5R3-VIhgccE/w-d-xo.html
Lmao
Hancock and Schoch are honest and frank, which is a rarity in their field. Black scholars have been writing and teaching about this for over 50 years but have been disregarded as pseudo scientific. Obviously, there is an incentive / reward to find yourself in the past. The European archeologists who would love to show or connect themselves to this part of pre-ancient history simply cannot. To affirm this science and research, showing Black people having mummification technology and other evidence of advanced civilization that far in the past, invalidates the current historical model of Kemet (Egypt) at the time - that it was a primitive hunter gatherer popultion. It exposes the institutional rhetoric, dogma and propaganda. Hence, the reason for the pushback and suppression. Let's be honest, does anyone really think a culture that at the time was enslaving black people, that at the time was extremely hostile and racist to black people, would simultaneously admit that black people were the inception and conception of Ancient and Pre-Ancient Kemetian (Egyptian) civilization..? That black people were the actual Light of the World..? Really, let's all put on out thinking caps for a moment. It's blatantly obvious. They had no choice but to uphold the culture, and consequently to lie, misdirect and supress. To deduce anything else is nonsensical. Now, though, is the time of revelation. It's time for the real scientists and archeologists to get the right and proper exposure. Peace and love to the human family.
This is just a reupload, there is one with millions of views, it's old news.
Where is it????
@@Iluvmuneeytimeline world history documentaries 2 million views
Funny that the views are low
Can you believe that?
What's crazy is that there are so few comments
Had this mummy been found in the Middle east or Europe this video would have gone viral and it would have 1M comments
"An unknown people" Lol at the mental gymnastics. They'll look for anyway they can to not say they were Africans...
These scholars have to realize that the Ancient Egyptian timeline is likely wrong. Graham Hancock and Robert M. Schoch have noted this in their research of the Sphinx. These water grooves at the base of the Sphinx suggests that it happened at a much earlier time. Those water grooves can only happen during a wet period in the region. That would place Egypt ancient timeline further back. Of course, the institutional scholars push back on this. It’s valid evidence of this new timeline. Google it. So the mummification style potentially came from people related to Ancient Egypt in some way or the Egyptians passed on the knowledge themselves.
Hancock and Schoch are honest and frank, which is a rarity in their field. Black scholars have been writing and teaching about this for over 50 years but have been disregarded as pseudo scientific. Obviously, there is an incentive / reward to find yourself in the past. The European archeologists who would love to show or connect themselves to this part of pre-ancient history simply cannot. To affirm this science and research, showing Black people having mummification technology and other evidence of advanced civilization that far in the past, invalidates the current historical model of Kemet (Egypt) at the time - that it was a primitive hunter gatherer popultion. It exposes the institutional rhetoric, dogma and propaganda. Hence, the reason for the pushback and suppression. Let's be honest, does anyone really think a culture that at the time was enslaving black people, that at the time was extremely hostile and racist to black people, would simultaneously admit that black people were the inception and conception of Ancient and Pre-Ancient Kemetian (Egyptian) civilization..? That black people were the actual Light of the World..? Really, let's all put on out thinking caps for a moment. It's blatantly obvious. They had no choice but to uphold the culture, and consequently to lie, misdirect and supress. To deduce anything else is nonsensical. Now, though, is the time of revelation. It's time for the real scientists and archeologists to get the right and proper exposure. Peace and love to the human family.
The sacrifice rituals can be found in the Bible . These people gave their best cattle to their god to bring rain . The levites priests did this along with the priests of Egypt
The Bible is a fairytale
@@truth2powermillions400 some of it is exaggerated for sure and allegory is all in it but much of it is true
@@truth2powermillions400Prove it.
Oddly, the archaeogenetics technology wasn't mentioned.
Watch the full video, this mummy from southern Libya at the borders of Niger and Algeria, the Uan Muhaggiag community was mixed-race, like that Tuareg or Toubou kid.
It’s still a black Saharan child. It’s absurd to say otherwise.
I watched the full video and at the very start, it's said:' Original people would be black Africans of the South.'
@@Herosennin Did you see the part where he said: “We have black people coming from the south , and say, white people coming from Near East and Eastern Sahara.”
“Libya has been a great melting pot through out its history but what is really surprising is How far back in time that goes, this intermingling of White Mediterranean types with N3groid Saharan Types”
“it is this mixed race culture which mummified Uan Mahuggiag”
Sort by Newest first
I found the section that mentions this and it honestly seems like cope on the part of the researcher. Maybe I missed something but it seems like the only reason for this clam is because of the art. Ignoring the color, he says the profile of the people in the rock art looks white. This is completely meaningless since Nilo-Saharan people tend to have different features, and when looking at the art you can clearly see that the depictions have darker skin, and some have larger noses and protruding mouth regions. But it's also crude rock art, and expecting exact proportion is silly. The cranial measurements coupled with analysis of the skin should put the matter to bed.