Review: Garmin Inreach mini Or Nautilus Lifeline???

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @bens-random-life
    @bens-random-life หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Appreciate the succinct and accurate info, as a lifelong mountain adventurer, the ocean is different 🤙

  • @shilohsf
    @shilohsf หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thorough and very helpful presentation 👍🏼

  • @katiesowul
    @katiesowul 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you so much for making this video! I've been trying to compare the two without experience with the Garmin InReach. This is SO helpful.

  • @kirkwilliams2127
    @kirkwilliams2127 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As an adventure boater.... I use both this and a few more. Some just in my life raft alone. And a Gumby suit. Your safely gear is going to cost you thousands of dollars and you better have redundancy at least 2x over. I can see the Nautilus as a stand alone for a diver for sure. Awesome review from someone that is obviously very experiences in it's use and as a first responder... gold advice here folks. Thank you for posting:-)

  • @bens.1603
    @bens.1603 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was very helpful in making my decision, thank you!

  • @MrRagool
    @MrRagool ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good review. The black hawk comment @10:00 was quiet funny 😂😂. I’m getting the Nautilus this week.

  • @Yggdrasil42
    @Yggdrasil42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great to see a comparison from a diver perspective. I wish one device could do both, of course. An Inreach with a local beacon would be ideal. But at least there are affordable options available.

    • @crossingtheglobe3122
      @crossingtheglobe3122  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah it would be awesome if they made a diver friendly version of the inreach that could transmit to ships around you as well. Or have the nautilus also send a satellite signal. I'm guessing something will come out with both.

  • @antoniomelchor7003
    @antoniomelchor7003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    excellent comparison

  • @StefJuncker
    @StefJuncker ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice review. Thx.. To the point, no bs..
    Well done

  • @iviewthetube
    @iviewthetube 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I totally agree that a radio signal, although great, does not guarantee immediate rescue. One needs to use the right device for the right situation. Recently, a MOB kayaker in Washington State made an emergency 911 call using a cell phone and they did not get to him in time. IMO, had he used a marine channel 16 or VTS Channel 14 followed up by an DSC/AIS MOB distress with MMSI# and GPS Coords, a passenger ferry, or other vessel, within one to three miles would likely have been able to get a rescue raft to him in time.

    • @crossingtheglobe3122
      @crossingtheglobe3122  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah that's why I ended up getting both. I wanted the best chance I could get for the circumstances. Working in emergency services has really shown me how far away help can be.

    • @iviewthetube
      @iviewthetube 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@crossingtheglobe3122 At least with the wrong device they will have a great chronology of when and how you died.

    • @SeattleRingHunter
      @SeattleRingHunter 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No guarantee of that but it makes for a reasonable argument. Most likely in the Puget Sound they would send the SPD Marine Division or Coast guard to the GPS location to investigate the received distress call.

    • @iviewthetube
      @iviewthetube 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SeattleRingHunter Whenever I cross the Puget Sound in a kayak, I am always able to get hold of Seattle Traffic on Marine Channel 14. Many of the WSF's are on there , too.

  • @studio_rtr
    @studio_rtr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great comparison, exactly what I was looking for. Thank you!

  • @jamescross
    @jamescross 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    cool! nice review.

  • @brycejohnson1780
    @brycejohnson1780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!

  • @mikmorales2755
    @mikmorales2755 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative!

  • @rvierra7235
    @rvierra7235 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool post. Thank you 👍