After analyzing the game of roulette for several days Albert Einstein told his friend that the best way to make money with roulette is to wait until the dealer has gone to the bathroom then grab all the money and run out the door!
well al was wrong, if roulette is truly random them just wait for a pattern to emerge and bet against it continuing, it may continue for eternity buy it's a safe bet that it'll cease sometime, also roulette is a game where we set the odds, for example if i cover 0/00/2 and take 2nd and 3rd dozens then i have 27 slots to land in and dealer only has 11 , that's about 71% for me , or put another way , 7 out of 10. roulette can be beat !
I like the rocket. Total 3 step win has a 9.4% chance of hitting, Step 3 can have a breakeven. If you get way down, you can just increase by 2 units at the step 1 if you want. This has a 5:1 payout when you complete a cycle. If you win all 3 steps while betting $110 at step 1, you break even.
First system: Lots of online Casino's don't allow this bet where you got 36 numbers covered. There are 18 numbers profitable, so you can just keep betting and increasing on these 18 numbers, 6 streets, it's the same. Or just keep adding one unit on the double street of the same single streets.
Lol exactly. They have every number covered in 2nd level. Basically you only make money on 1st level. But like you said most places, you can't even use this system
Betting 36 and 18 are not the same let's just get the facts straight. Also, you can bet on all 36 if the bets on some numbers are not the same as some others. Almost nothing you and you clone said are true.
Don't you realize that the casino is tricking you?! They "forbid" it. You think that if they forbid it, it means that it is beneficial for you to play this way. You start to figure out how to get around it. On ETG, you play on two terminals, and on live, you take a friend with you... As a result, you return home without any money. This is so stupid!
The third step is trying to win one dozen before the other which essentially is a 50/50 bet, you would be better off moving the third step back to an outside bet to avoid the extra spins that might hit 0/00
The problem is that roulette is mathematically created. So you can’t use math to beat it. It’s like the Chinese finger trap, the harder you pull the tighter it gets! The only way you might beat roulette is less time playing. And leaving as soon as you have a profit of any kind in the least amount of spins.
Leaving as soon as you have a decent profit applies to all the games. Even blackjack where you can get an edge of about 1/2 percent by counting. In the end depending on your bet, blackjack players only make $30-40 an hour . ( depends on bet size). So if you are up $1000 after 1 hour you should leave, if the math shows you should only be up $100.
21:39 this obsession with the zeros. Hitting that zero was no worse than hitting any of the 14 numbers that would be a loss there. Nothing magical about zeros. They are just two more numbers. You have them covered or you don’t. No different than not having 11 and 27 covered if the ball lands there. Also, no math genius would claim to have a good roulette system. Because they know you are losing 5.26% of every bet you make. Matter what system you use.
No, the difference is, that when there is heavy outside betting, the wheel may be spun to favour the zeros. One may even choose to add 0/00/2 instead of one line (same payout), or just add to the six for reduced winnings but more coverage.
that's if you play 50-50 bets, speaking of zero,s i cover 0/00/2 and take 2nd and 3rd dozens , i got 27 slots dealer only has 11 , i got a 71% chance, 7 out of 10, i 've lost with this but i just leave when i do , i've won more though .
@@philiphebbard there is an anti-cheese system put on those online roulette tables you start doing that and you notice numbers hitting back to back in that 5% area personally I won’t be playing at table with double zeros
Improved version of the rocket hold off on betting the bottom till 3 of the same color hit then place opposite increasing 1 unit if fail till the hit happens then place on the line that hit and the second line that hit, if a fail occurs look for a triple color again before returning to betting phase, if pass double the line that hit, if break even on doubled up bet, play it till a jackpot or loss, if pass reset betting phase, if fail continue betting phase as if you missed the line hit
This question is for the system developers. I have a system that is really testing well so far. it ALWAYS uses six split bets, no more and no less. It is currently using a steep progression and winning like crazy. What other type of progression would you recommend for testing (Ladders, etc.). Please help by making any legit options to try.
Three Wise Kings; not to be confused with "Three Wise Men". When I try this system today, I hope it brings me all Gold. Keep the Frankincense and Myrrh,(I don't even know what they are) LOL. Happy Holidays RM and to all of the Community!
You know I was sceptic about Dustin’s system three kings but however I hate to admit that I was wrong! This one seems to be the only system which preformed exceptionally great with inside bets! At first I didn’t think it will do good with the double zero wheel but I was wrong! With some more trial and error I think it will replace my 29 numbers system on the top 5😢! The second system is also fantastic but when you move the bets to columns two modifications can be made to increase your odds! 1.) when you move to columns you check which hit last and bet the other two! 2.) when you win on the column on the first step and you want to double one of them don’t double the column that just won double the other one! I don’t know? That’s my opinion! Thank you for sharing ❤the roulette master 💌
when do you people learn that all systems work when the casino is willing to pay out and that all systems fail when the casino dont pay out,you system players are not so smart huh 😂😂
The rocket system is intriguing as it seems like you make profit whenever you eventually complete a cycle. You aren't necessarily digging a huge hole in between, as long as you have patience and a good bankroll. But could implement a stop loss if you keep missing cycle after cycle and not necessarily go broke or risking too much at any point, which are my preferred systems.. those that can sustain losses but not go bust on the worst streaks. Just tried it on a demo game and was up 45 units after 20-30 mins, was down maybe 25-30 units at lowest point before completing a cycle. I like this one.. so far.
Great content, as always! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
On the first system ,when you lay out 5 units, if you start your 5 units on a street instead of a double street, that will eliminate losses where you currently have placed your double streets. If you. Make this change, you will win 15 dollars on your end streets.
Maybe William can check my math. I figured out the odds of completing the cycle with a win. Chance of even money win = 18/38 = .473. 2nd level = chance of hitting 2 dozen = 24/38 = .631. Chance of hitting the correct single dozen = 12/38 = .316. Chance of successfully completing all is .473 * .631 * .316 = 9.4. This means the chance of loss = 1 - 9.4 = .906. Let's say the bankroll is $3000 for $10 starting bet. You would have (24) chances to complete the winning cycle (10+10+10.... = $3000 after 24 losses). The chance of loss is .906. To the 24th power = 9.2% chance of ruin. If my math is correct, you would lose your whole bankroll once every 10 to 11 sessions.
6 วันที่ผ่านมา +3
Any strategy that involves red/black isn’t very impressive ….But the play strategy switching to columns is good…..However those columns should be chosen according to dominant color…..Black would be Col 1-2 & red would be Col 1-3
I agree the system can always be altered from coloumn to rows. Like you said I look for the streaks and try to bet them. Seems if there's a color streak you should pick the 2 coloumns with the most of that color. That's the beauty of it. Play your gut, or play statistics it's all up to you. but most of all Have fun
@@JuanFelis-bb2eq you are exactly right. But you are more likely to land on the same color twice in a row than for it to go red/black/red/black equally. It happens, but not for long. Just my observation I’m still a noob though
This is not mathematical. If you look for the relationship between the wheel and the table you will find that there are only 3 sectors on the American wheel! All the dozens share the same 3 sectors. Look at the 1st dozen. 1,3,10,12 are corners and are all located near 00 along with the corners of the other dozens. 2,5,8,11 are all located near 0. The rest 4,7,6,9 eight of the 12 numbers are all together with the remaining 4 numbers not far away. So why not either bet the sector will repeat on the next spin or bet against it repeating?
25:00 13-16-1 all in the bottom 3 in a row , i will switch whatever i'm playing if a see a streak like that , roulette is random, when i see streaks or patterns, i bet against it continuing .
Math based? All chance betting from two different stratergies. Saying you can move bets around. Wheres the Math? Same risks x 2. Same idea has been tested by CEG Dealer School and Jack Ace many times. Even bet to placing 2 12s, and then to a rediculous high risk bet inside bet. Just comparing.
Ok so ive done a little math on your system so that hopefully we can work together in trying to perfect a system. I know we know we are playing a loosing game but a well built system can help to maximise our profit potential. So if i miss something please let me know. We are looking at a 3 bet system starting with 1 outside bet at 47.37% then mooveing to 2 sets/rows of 12 bet at 63.16% and finally a 3rd bet of 12 numbers vs 14 numbers at 46.15%. If im doing the math right i believe that means that on average you can count on compleating the cycle 13.8% of the time. This would mean that if you were to change the final bet from 12 vs 14 numbers at a 46.15% probability of winning to betting all 3 units on an outside bet at a 47.37 % probability of winning you would increse your probability of compleating your cycle to 15%. I also wonder if you considered that at 13.8% probability this means that on average it will take 7 attempts to compleat the cycle and if you count up investments 1-6 this means that appon compleating the cycle your profit on investment is only double not the 5 times it would be if compleated first try. Hope we can work together, thanks
Tested the second system and I had a lot of losses before completing the first betting cycle after 22 spins and it was still down $400 after that so I quit the test because just doubling one column to complete the cycle just relies on pure luck and NOT math. Interesting system but NOT for ME!!!
Calling for William, creator of the rocket! Hello, im no mathmatition but your system seems descent. However id like to challenge you here and give you the chance to present your math. 1st your useing a martingale like system here. We know the martingale will always eventualy end in catastrophy though it can put losses off for some time. Also my basic math says if you start with a 4 unit bet split between 2 sets of 12 this increases your anitial hit percentage substantialy and then to take that 2 unit win to make 2 three unit bets split between 2 rows of 12 would win 3 units giving you a tottal of 9 units after 2 wins effectivly turning your 4 unit bet into 9 for over 100% profit of orriginal bet. This removes the martingale style and also your never playing 12 numbers against 14 with a chance of breaking even. With the 12 against 14 and the enitial starting bet both haveing a hit percentage below 50 percent its seems a substantial improvement for both my bets being raised to arround 63% would you be so kind as to explain your math and or defend your system vs this one? Thanks
The System is designed s the only stake you have invested is the original 1 to 1 bet. This bet does not Martingale. if you lose your only going up 1 unit. If.you win you are using your winnings to make the extra bets. The System is designed to win 5 times your original bet. ex bet 10 if complete all stages you win 50. Now the issue with the system if you can't completely the cycle eventually you will need two wins at third stage to recover. I believe that's around the 11th loss. If you review the video you will see that our bankroll was never in danger. That's the key. BTW I love math but not a math genius.
Maybe you should learn what Martingale is before you accuse someone's system of using it. Maybe you should go back to school or learn how to use spell check before correcting someone else.
@@whoover03 It is an interesting system and not far from a couple of my systems that increase the coverage as you win. I think there may be better ways to adjust the bet sizes but like you mentioned, the bankroll was never in danger, so playing it just as it is, should work over the long haul. I think this is one of the better systems I have seen here on this channel, but I will have to play it for a few thousand spins before my final verdict is in, but it looks good so far. Thanks for sharing.
The 3rs are reading riting and rithmetic. As you are no mathmatition your descent eventualy to catastrophy useing anitial will substantialy give tottal units effectivly profit of the orriginal bet. The enitial bets are haveing arround 63%.
@kentuckwhite6701 Thanks so much means alot coming from a master like you. Your systems on the channel is incredible. Moving corners system.... pure genius. Thanks again
I'm always baffled when you have a cumulative profit but claim to not be in session profit. Literally "session profit" means there is a net profit (balance is >$0.00) for the session, but you use the term differently. Please explain how a net profit is not a session profit.
I really enjoy watching these videos and testing these systems on an app. But having been a casino dealer, and having a complete understanding of the odds, probability, and house edge in roulette and craps, all of these systems only prove one thing - there is no system that can beat either game without luck. Keep trying, though.
The first system "The 3 wise kings" is terrible. The second bet covers 36 numbers and the payouts are no different than if you only add one bet on the double street between the initial street bets..
Obviously it is gambling, keep getting their money and betting bigger. Not sure if I like it but I see some value. Can get rid of the outside bets and just bet 24 numbers.
For real, the most of your systems are not good. Most of your title should be bad, worse, worst. But the second system is really good. finally no more stupid martingale and extremely exaggerated bets for a $10 profit. Like this one.
Thank you for helping me continue my gambling addiction
funny 😅
After analyzing the game of roulette for several days Albert Einstein told his friend that the best way to make money with roulette is to wait until the dealer has gone to the bathroom then grab all the money and run out the door!
Albert was a stud
well al was wrong, if roulette is truly random them just wait for a pattern to emerge and bet against it continuing, it may continue for eternity buy it's a safe bet that it'll cease sometime, also roulette is a game where we set the odds, for example if i cover 0/00/2 and take 2nd and 3rd dozens then i have 27 slots to land in and dealer only has 11 , that's about 71% for me , or put another way , 7 out of 10. roulette can be beat !
Your Albert Einstein's Method is by FAR THE BEST AR!
I have taken 500k from roulette. Bored with it. What would Albert say about that ?
You are boring. We have all heard about what Einstein sad 1000 times.
I like the rocket. Total 3 step win has a 9.4% chance of hitting, Step 3 can have a breakeven. If you get way down, you can just increase by 2 units at the step 1 if you want. This has a 5:1 payout when you complete a cycle. If you win all 3 steps while betting $110 at step 1, you break even.
After 20 spins I was up $520 with the second system starting from a $10 unit.
🎉 this is a good one 👍 I did the same with 25 units and it made a lot
Which one?
First system: Lots of online Casino's don't allow this bet where you got 36 numbers covered. There are 18 numbers profitable, so you can just keep betting and increasing on these 18 numbers, 6 streets, it's the same. Or just keep adding one unit on the double street of the same single streets.
Lol exactly. They have every number covered in 2nd level. Basically you only make money on 1st level. But like you said most places, you can't even use this system
Betting 36 and 18 are not the same let's just get the facts straight. Also, you can bet on all 36 if the bets on some numbers are not the same as some others. Almost nothing you and you clone said are true.
Don't you realize that the casino is tricking you?! They "forbid" it. You think that if they forbid it, it means that it is beneficial for you to play this way. You start to figure out how to get around it. On ETG, you play on two terminals, and on live, you take a friend with you... As a result, you return home without any money. This is so stupid!
Don't play on or in those casinos. You should be able to cover 36 or all numbers you want but you will lose sooner or later anyways.
The third step is trying to win one dozen before the other which essentially is a 50/50 bet, you would be better off moving the third step back to an outside bet to avoid the extra spins that might hit 0/00
The problem is that roulette is mathematically created. So you can’t use math to beat it. It’s like the Chinese finger trap, the harder you pull the tighter it gets! The only way you might beat roulette is less time playing. And leaving as soon as you have a profit of any kind in the least amount of spins.
And set stop losses, cause you can’t prevent losing streaks in any system.
Leaving as soon as you have a decent profit applies to all the games. Even blackjack where you can get an edge of about 1/2 percent by counting. In the end depending on your bet, blackjack players only make $30-40 an hour . ( depends on bet size). So if you are up $1000 after 1 hour you should leave, if the math shows you should only be up $100.
@ first of all people can use their hourly rate to determine a walk away amount.
@ I cashed out over $2k just on the last 2 Saturdays playing against the sectors in roulette. Hit a couple of small jackpots and a few for $1200.
21:39 this obsession with the zeros. Hitting that zero was no worse than hitting any of the 14 numbers that would be a loss there. Nothing magical about zeros. They are just two more numbers. You have them covered or you don’t. No different than not having 11 and 27 covered if the ball lands there.
Also, no math genius would claim to have a good roulette system. Because they know you are losing 5.26% of every bet you make. Matter what system you use.
No, the difference is, that when there is heavy outside betting, the wheel may be spun to favour the zeros. One may even choose to add 0/00/2 instead of one line (same payout), or just add to the six for reduced winnings but more coverage.
that's if you play 50-50 bets, speaking of zero,s i cover 0/00/2 and take 2nd and 3rd dozens , i got 27 slots dealer only has 11 , i got a 71% chance, 7 out of 10, i 've lost with this but i just leave when i do , i've won more though .
The magic of the 0s are in the math. They are the reason the casinos have an edge
@@philiphebbard there is an anti-cheese system put on those online roulette tables you start doing that and you notice numbers hitting back to back in that 5% area personally I won’t be playing at table with double zeros
Improved version of the rocket hold off on betting the bottom till 3 of the same color hit then place opposite increasing 1 unit if fail till the hit happens then place on the line that hit and the second line that hit, if a fail occurs look for a triple color again before returning to betting phase, if pass double the line that hit, if break even on doubled up bet, play it till a jackpot or loss, if pass reset betting phase, if fail continue betting phase as if you missed the line hit
Two interesting systems 🙂
hey master, i have an idea: you should write down the strategies in the description, it would be much easier.
Will you show the balance more often? And leave it for a few seconds so we can see the balance amount.
I had the same request
This question is for the system developers. I have a system that is really testing well so far. it ALWAYS uses six split bets, no more and no less. It is currently using a steep progression and winning like crazy.
What other type of progression would you recommend for testing (Ladders, etc.). Please help by making any legit options to try.
Care to share? I’m relatively new, I have one system that seems to be working well also
Go up $1 on each split after every spin no matter what.....reset when in profit or close to it after a bad run
Six splits is 12 numbers just bet on one dozen for the same result
Three Wise Kings; not to be confused with "Three Wise Men".
When I try this system today, I hope it brings me all Gold. Keep the Frankincense and
Myrrh,(I don't even know what they are) LOL. Happy Holidays RM and to all of the Community!
Don't even try!
Played the 3kings at the casino in south Africa last night and walked off with a 1000rand great system thanks be playing it a lot more
I agree, it’s good
You know I was sceptic about Dustin’s system three kings but however I hate to admit that I was wrong! This one seems to be the only system which preformed exceptionally great with inside bets! At first I didn’t think it will do good with the double zero wheel but I was wrong! With some more trial and error I think it will replace my 29 numbers system on the top 5😢! The second system is also fantastic but when you move the bets to columns two modifications can be made to increase your odds! 1.) when you move to columns you check which hit last and bet the other two! 2.) when you win on the column on the first step and you want to double one of them don’t double the column that just won double the other one! I don’t know? That’s my opinion! Thank you for sharing ❤the roulette master 💌
i play a very simaliar way .
Another great system 💕💕💕it!
😁😁😁😁
when do you people learn that all systems work when the casino is willing to pay out and that all systems fail when the casino dont pay out,you system players are not so smart huh 😂😂
The rocket system is intriguing as it seems like you make profit whenever you eventually complete a cycle. You aren't necessarily digging a huge hole in between, as long as you have patience and a good bankroll. But could implement a stop loss if you keep missing cycle after cycle and not necessarily go broke or risking too much at any point, which are my preferred systems.. those that can sustain losses but not go bust on the worst streaks.
Just tried it on a demo game and was up 45 units after 20-30 mins, was down maybe 25-30 units at lowest point before completing a cycle. I like this one.. so far.
🎉🎉🎉 Cool
Great content, as always! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
On the first system ,when you lay out 5 units, if you start your 5 units on a street instead of a double street, that will eliminate losses where you currently have placed your double streets. If you. Make this change, you will win 15 dollars on your end streets.
The best strategy is to give yourself a reasonable target then walk away once you have achieved it. Get your target by covering 24 numbers
Played twice on simulator and lost bank both times
Maybe William can check my math. I figured out the odds of completing the cycle with a win. Chance of even money win = 18/38 = .473. 2nd level = chance of hitting 2 dozen = 24/38 = .631. Chance of hitting the correct single dozen = 12/38 = .316. Chance of successfully completing all is .473 * .631 * .316 = 9.4. This means the chance of loss = 1 - 9.4 = .906. Let's say the bankroll is $3000 for $10 starting bet. You would have (24) chances to complete the winning cycle (10+10+10.... = $3000 after 24 losses). The chance of loss is .906. To the 24th power = 9.2% chance of ruin. If my math is correct, you would lose your whole bankroll once every 10 to 11 sessions.
Any strategy that involves red/black isn’t very impressive ….But the play strategy switching to columns is good…..However those columns should be chosen according to dominant color…..Black would be Col 1-2 & red would be Col 1-3
Red or black is one of the best odds in the casinos
I agree the system can always be altered from coloumn to rows. Like you said I look for the streaks and try to bet them. Seems if there's a color streak you should pick the 2 coloumns with the most of that color. That's the beauty of it. Play your gut, or play statistics it's all up to you. but most of all Have fun
Roulette has no memmory
@@JuanFelis-bb2eq you are exactly right. But you are more likely to land on the same color twice in a row than for it to go red/black/red/black equally. It happens, but not for long. Just my observation I’m still a noob though
@@JuanFelis-bb2eqelectronic sure does!
RM,you have to show the loss/ profit after every spin than we can see wgats happening with the bank roll
Do you guys think the automated roulette wheel is 100% random? Do you prefer to play with a live person spinning the wheel?
This is not mathematical. If you look for the relationship between the wheel and the table you will find that there are only 3 sectors on the American wheel! All the dozens share the same 3 sectors. Look at the 1st dozen. 1,3,10,12 are corners and are all located near 00 along with the corners of the other dozens. 2,5,8,11 are all located near 0. The rest 4,7,6,9 eight of the 12 numbers are all together with the remaining 4 numbers not far away. So why not either bet the sector will repeat on the next spin or bet against it repeating?
25:00 13-16-1 all in the bottom 3 in a row , i will switch whatever i'm playing if a see a streak like that , roulette is random, when i see streaks or patterns, i bet against it continuing .
Hopscotch?
Math based? All chance betting from two different stratergies. Saying you can move bets around. Wheres the Math? Same risks x 2. Same idea has been tested by CEG Dealer School and Jack Ace many times. Even bet to placing 2 12s, and then to a rediculous high risk bet inside bet. Just comparing.
You placed a $75 bet to win $40
Ok so ive done a little math on your system so that hopefully we can work together in trying to perfect a system. I know we know we are playing a loosing game but a well built system can help to maximise our profit potential. So if i miss something please let me know. We are looking at a 3 bet system starting with 1 outside bet at 47.37% then mooveing to 2 sets/rows of 12 bet at 63.16% and finally a 3rd bet of 12 numbers vs 14 numbers at 46.15%. If im doing the math right i believe that means that on average you can count on compleating the cycle 13.8% of the time. This would mean that if you were to change the final bet from 12 vs 14 numbers at a 46.15% probability of winning to betting all 3 units on an outside bet at a 47.37 % probability of winning you would increse your probability of compleating your cycle to 15%. I also wonder if you considered that at 13.8% probability this means that on average it will take 7 attempts to compleat the cycle and if you count up investments 1-6 this means that appon compleating the cycle your profit on investment is only double not the 5 times it would be if compleated first try. Hope we can work together, thanks
Tested the second system and I had a lot of losses before completing the first betting cycle after 22 spins and it was still down $400 after that so I quit the test because just doubling one column to complete the cycle just relies on pure luck and NOT math. Interesting system but NOT for ME!!!
Calling for William, creator of the rocket! Hello, im no mathmatition but your system seems descent. However id like to challenge you here and give you the chance to present your math. 1st your useing a martingale like system here. We know the martingale will always eventualy end in catastrophy though it can put losses off for some time. Also my basic math says if you start with a 4 unit bet split between 2 sets of 12 this increases your anitial hit percentage substantialy and then to take that 2 unit win to make 2 three unit bets split between 2 rows of 12 would win 3 units giving you a tottal of 9 units after 2 wins effectivly turning your 4 unit bet into 9 for over 100% profit of orriginal bet. This removes the martingale style and also your never playing 12 numbers against 14 with a chance of breaking even. With the 12 against 14 and the enitial starting bet both haveing a hit percentage below 50 percent its seems a substantial improvement for both my bets being raised to arround 63% would you be so kind as to explain your math and or defend your system vs this one? Thanks
The System is designed s the only stake you have invested is the original 1 to 1 bet. This bet does not Martingale. if you lose your only going up 1 unit. If.you win you are using your winnings to make the extra bets. The System is designed to win 5 times your original bet. ex bet 10 if complete all stages you win 50. Now the issue with the system if you can't completely the cycle eventually you will need two wins at third stage to recover. I believe that's around the 11th loss. If you review the video you will see that our bankroll was never in danger. That's the key. BTW I love math but not a math genius.
Maybe you should learn what Martingale is before you accuse someone's system of using it. Maybe you should go back to school or learn how to use spell check before correcting someone else.
@@whoover03 It is an interesting system and not far from a couple of my systems that increase the coverage as you win. I think there may be better ways to adjust the bet sizes but like you mentioned, the bankroll was never in danger, so playing it just as it is, should work over the long haul. I think this is one of the better systems I have seen here on this channel, but I will have to play it for a few thousand spins before my final verdict is in, but it looks good so far. Thanks for sharing.
The 3rs are reading riting and rithmetic. As you are no mathmatition your descent eventualy to catastrophy useing anitial will substantialy give tottal units effectivly profit of the orriginal bet. The enitial bets are haveing arround 63%.
@kentuckwhite6701 Thanks so much means alot coming from a master like you. Your systems on the channel is incredible. Moving corners system.... pure genius. Thanks again
I don't think you mentioned the bankroll for the 2nd system.
He didn’t. I was wondering the same thing
I'm always baffled when you have a cumulative profit but claim to not be in session profit. Literally "session profit" means there is a net profit (balance is >$0.00) for the session, but you use the term differently. Please explain how a net profit is not a session profit.
What online site are you using to play?
I have the app on my phone "roulette royale"
I really enjoy watching these videos and testing these systems on an app. But having been a casino dealer, and having a complete understanding of the odds, probability, and house edge in roulette and craps, all of these systems only prove one thing - there is no system that can beat either game without luck. Keep trying, though.
This rocket came back to earth and crashed...
Try making 100 hr for 46 hrs
The first system "The 3 wise kings" is terrible. The second bet covers 36 numbers and the payouts are no different than if you only add one bet on the double street between the initial street bets..
Obviously it is gambling, keep getting their money and betting bigger. Not sure if I like it but I see some value. Can get rid of the outside bets and just bet 24 numbers.
Actually i tried many of your new ways to win and end up losing a lot of my money, was it not you who said that casino roulette was not rigged?
Got whacked twice in a row.
For real, the most of your systems are not good. Most of your title should be bad, worse, worst. But the second system is really good. finally no more stupid martingale and extremely exaggerated bets for a $10 profit. Like this one.
The thing is the casino's Cheat
I presume that he is mathematician in kindergarden school.......
CEG did this long ago. Not for me.
Which one
@@dougkercher3364 the “mathematician” method. Been around a long time.
i win $110000
Bogus
Horse crap