Comparing log_10(11) and log_11(12)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
  • Join this channel to get access to perks:→ bit.ly/3cBgfR1
    My merch → teespring.com/...
    Follow me → / sybermath
    Subscribe → www.youtube.co...
    Suggest → forms.gle/A5bG...
    If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
    in...
    #ChallengingMathProblems #ComparingNumbers
    EXPLORE 😎:
    Simplifying a Complicated Algebraic Expression: • Simplifying a Complica...
    Solving a Polynomial System in Two Ways: • Solving a Polynomial S...
    A Trigonometry Challenge: • A Trigonometry Challenge
    PLAYLISTS 🎵 :
    Number Theory Problems: • Number Theory Problems
    Challenging Math Problems: • Challenging Math Problems
    Trigonometry Problems: • Trigonometry Problems
    Diophantine Equations and Systems: • Diophantine Equations ...
    Calculus: • Calculus

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @웅웅웅-d3s
    @웅웅웅-d3s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    My solution is like this.
    10->11: percentage increase is 1/10
    11->12: percentage increase is 1/11
    1/10is greater than 1/11, so log(10)11is greater.

  • @randomjin9392
    @randomjin9392 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Base e: ln11/ln10 ~ ln12/ln11 so we compare ln²11 and ln10∙ln12. But by AM-GM: √(ln10∙ln12) < (ln10+ln12)/2 = ln√120 < ln√121 = ln11. Hence log₁₀11 > log₁₁12
    EDIT: this can be generalized if we set 11=x: √ln(x+1)ln(x-1) < (ln(x+1)+ln(x-1))/2 = ln√(x²-1) < ln√x² = ln(x), assuming that x>1

    • @bahadrberkylmaz6085
      @bahadrberkylmaz6085 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      x must be greater than 2 because ln (x-1) must be positive . And also, we must observe the positive value of inside the root.

    • @emilie375
      @emilie375 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just the proof I was looking for, thanks.

  • @kurzackd
    @kurzackd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Honestly, this is more a logic question than a maths question.
    You are suppose to REASON why the correct answer is what it is, not calculate it mathematically.

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good thinking!

  • @vijaychaudhari3192
    @vijaychaudhari3192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I started following this sir from today

  • @bahadrberkylmaz6085
    @bahadrberkylmaz6085 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for your alternative solution,sir I solved tricky way which is based on A.M>=G.M. If I explain,
    121>120 => log 121>log120=> log11>(log10+log12)/2 > (log 10*log12)^(0.5)
    => (log11)^2>log 10*log12=> (log11/log10)>(log12/log11)

    • @spacescopex
      @spacescopex 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A Must-see: th-cam.com/video/5dKy5IQZy0Y/w-d-xo.html

  • @sberacatalin2250
    @sberacatalin2250 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tare! Problema complexa si cu schepsis! Bravo! Next?!

  • @plamenpenchev262
    @plamenpenchev262 ปีที่แล้ว

    Logarithms are very important in Analytical Chemistry that is why I teach my students on them. Usualy, I draw graphs of two of them -- one with a base of 10, the other of e.
    For x > 1, that with a higher base is always the lower graph (easily to proof mathematically). That is why the point (11, log10(11)) is on the higher graph and that (12, log11(12)) on the lower.

  • @DirtyHuman4831
    @DirtyHuman4831 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We can see the derivative of the function:
    f=log (x+1) with base x.
    We can see it will come decreasing function for all x>e. So log 11, base 10 will be greater.

    • @yoav613
      @yoav613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It decreasing for any x>0 with V.A at x=1 for example log2(3)>log2.5(3.5)

    • @DirtyHuman4831
      @DirtyHuman4831 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@yoav613 Ohh yes, you are right mate...

    • @WahranRai
      @WahranRai 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You had calculated mentally the derivative and deduced its sign ?!

    • @DirtyHuman4831
      @DirtyHuman4831 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WahranRai Yess, with very less paper work too.

    • @satyapalsingh4429
      @satyapalsingh4429 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your method is very short , Sharma Ji .Keep it up !God bless you .

  • @satyapalsingh4429
    @satyapalsingh4429 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are genius , dear professor .Keep it up !

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you, I will

  • @ninoemanuelesquibel3866
    @ninoemanuelesquibel3866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't understand anything but I feel like gaining intelligence +.5

  • @shamilbabayev8405
    @shamilbabayev8405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let log₁₀11 =a, log₁₁12=b, then 11=10^a, 12=11^b so 11+1=11^b , 10^a+1=11^b from here (10+1)^a- F(a)=11^b, 11^a-F(a)=11^b, 11^a>11^b, a>b. Maybe I missed something, but think this is right and short way of solution....

  • @yllam3995
    @yllam3995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    y = log x = ln x /ln10
    y' = 1/( x ln10 ) > 0 for all x > 0
    y'' = -1/( xx ln10 ) < 0 for all x > 0
    Therefore, y is increasing but the rate of increase is decreasing as x increases,
    For the three numbers 10, 11, 12,
    log11 - log10 > log12 - log11 > 0
    0 < log10 < log11
    We get,
    ( log11 - log10 )/log10 > ( log12 - log11 )/ log11
    log11/log10 - 1 > log12/log11 - 1
    This is a good problem from SyberMath Sir 😃

  • @wesleysuen4140
    @wesleysuen4140 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The comparison simply follows from the concavity of the log function.

  • @yoav613
    @yoav613 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice!

  • @pwmiles56
    @pwmiles56 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, late to the party but I found an algebraic method
    Put A=log(11), B=log11(12). (log is to base 10)
    By base conversion formula
    A-B = log(11) - log(12)/log(11)
    log(11)*(A-B) = log(11)^2 - log(12)
    Use log(10) = 1
    log(11)*(A-B) = log(11)^2 - log(10)*log(12)
    = log(11)^2 - log(11/(11/10)) * log(11*(12/11))
    = log(11)^2 - [log(11) - log(11/10)] * [log(11) + log(12/11))
    Simplify
    log(11)*(A-B) = log(11) * [log(11/10) - log(12/11)] + log(11/10)*log(12/11)
    = log(11)*log(121/120) + log(11/10)*log(12/11)
    > 0

  • @jakubabram9606
    @jakubabram9606 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is more numbers betwen 11 and 121 than 10 and 100 hence, more I would guess that log base 10 of 11 is bigger than log base 11 of 12

  • @justabunga1
    @justabunga1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both log(11) and log_11(12) are greater than 1. Let's look at log_11(12). Change this formula as 1/log_12(11). It interchanges the base and the argument. Taking the reciprocal of that number makes the value smaller. Therefore, log(11)>log_11(12).

  • @dionysus1210
    @dionysus1210 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When i solve kind of comparings i switched logs to fraction
    Log10(11) 》11\10 and
    Log11(12) 》 12/11
    Now when we compare them we can see that 11/10 is greater so log10(11) also is greater

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does that even mean sorry..the fraction of two logs does.not generally equal thenlog of a fraction remember..so I'm assuming that's not what you meant

    • @dionysus1210
      @dionysus1210 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leif1075so sorry my eng is so bad that's why you don't understand me i mean that if logs are assigned as fractions (not equal) then their comparing will be the same
      Because we can write log10(11) as ln10/ln11 so ln10 is smaller than ln11 then 10 will be also smaller than 11

    • @robertveith6383
      @robertveith6383 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dionysus1210 -- No, log [base 10] (11) = [ln(11)]/[ln(10)] from the change of base rule. It is the
      log of the argument divided by the log of the former base.

    • @spacescopex
      @spacescopex 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A Must-see: th-cam.com/video/5dKy5IQZy0Y/w-d-xo.html

  • @nicogehren6566
    @nicogehren6566 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice

  • @Indianrealhero-dy8nw
    @Indianrealhero-dy8nw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good evening sir

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good Evening

  • @Jimmy-tv8tv
    @Jimmy-tv8tv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    11/10>12/11

  • @michaelempeigne3519
    @michaelempeigne3519 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    you confuse me when you say log 12 with base 11

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What should I say instead?

    • @michaelempeigne3519
      @michaelempeigne3519 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SyberMath idk but how about we just use ln's so that there is no worries

    • @JanxakaJX
      @JanxakaJX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelempeigne3519 /woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SyberMath at 3:59 do you realize all that g(×) is unnecessary ? Since inntje numerator younhwve x tikes ln x but as x increases that means ln x

    • @Jared7873
      @Jared7873 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SyberMath log 11 of 12

  • @rakenzarnsworld2
    @rakenzarnsworld2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    log 11 is greater