capital endowment increase (long run-Heckscher-Ohlin)--Rybczynski Theoem

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ธ.ค. 2024
  • Impact of an increase in capital on production and welfare in a Heckscher-Ohlin model. Version of the Rybczyski theorem. Impact on trade volume as well.

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @giovannisanchez5675
    @giovannisanchez5675 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thank you for these videos Professor. They have helped clarify a lot of the confusion my professor left me with.

  • @eds2888
    @eds2888 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your approaches in Economics really helps me a lot, elaborate and clear. Thank you Professor !

  • @selinabruns1879
    @selinabruns1879 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I highly appreciate your videos. Thank you for sharing your knowledge in such a great way.

  • @inigo1990
    @inigo1990 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Watching this video from Spain, thank you so much, it's very easy to follow and understand you

  • @lornamendoza2991
    @lornamendoza2991 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Professor, they have helped clarify the topic!!

  • @tidanbalasingam
    @tidanbalasingam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really appreciate the breakdown, thanks for the walkthroughs!

  • @XICrAvEIX
    @XICrAvEIX 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video. Great teacher.

  • @Asgerjg
    @Asgerjg 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Helped me pass my PhD thank you

    • @bjartex5
      @bjartex5 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Where did you get your Ph.D.? This is International trade 101

  • @sinhaesong3038
    @sinhaesong3038 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if suppose country a, which has a relative abundance of capital, further expands its endowment of capital. how this might effect the volume (amount) of trade and the international terms of trade with the rest of the world? under what conditions would the economic well-being of country a go down after this increase in capital?

  • @khanakjuneja8349
    @khanakjuneja8349 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thankyouu sooo muchhh.... ur videos really helped a lot...😊

  • @andrewashkar4854
    @andrewashkar4854 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I recommend watching at 1.5x speed.

  • @economicsisawesome5846
    @economicsisawesome5846 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think we you first post points A and B, you marked wrong positions. If this country consumes X at B more than its production of X at A, the country is importing good X. However, the country is supposed to be K-abundant and Good X is K-intensive good. How come the country needs to import it? It is contradict to H-O theorem, is it?

  • @putrilumbangaol5313
    @putrilumbangaol5313 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    how if the capital endowment decreasing?

  • @santoshacharya14
    @santoshacharya14 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you professor for this lecturer..I have more quarries about this theorem, want to ask you, if you entertain..

  • @mashkuralakbarov7069
    @mashkuralakbarov7069 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I swear the Rybczynski theorem states that there is no change in the long run... so I assume your discussion here applies to the short run effect

    • @momoore1957
      @momoore1957  9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Mashkur Alakbarov
      Commodity and factor prices do remain unchanged.
      But the expansion of resources will allow for more production (and increased total income and therefore higher welfare).
      The real focus of Rybczynski is how increased endowments change the pattern of production as capital and labor are allowed to move freely across industries---so it is a "long run" analysis.

  • @kailynwatson3157
    @kailynwatson3157 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    QAQ