Happy new year. I fully appreciate your effort and content. In order for us to improve over time, I was thinking that you would do one video on puzzles. For example, 10 puzzles from the super final on diverse chess concepts. Later you can cover them 'aka' give solutions one by one. This will give us time to think about the puzzles. Thanks.
Great explaining of this awsome game :) When i see this tactical display from the Fish I really wonder what kind of brilliant chess we will get when Stockfish 17 arives!
@@lethallohn yes that is true ofc, i ment more explicit that Stockfish in closed strategic games still loses from Leela zero and maybe SF17 is a bit better at those so the difference between them for closed games is smaller. In the end, at some point in the future..Leela and the Fish will be more or less the same probably.
Thanks Jozarov - a very unusual game. It's contradiction to the normal principles of chess. Normally the Black Queen being in such good communication with its King and the 3 pawns in front of Black's King, would make defence very easy for Black.
Dear Josip, i analyzed the game, and it seems that 25.-Nd5 was a heavy blunder. Much better was 25.- Rad8, and there is no white win in sight, black can at least continue the battle. After 25.- Nd5 the game is over!
just a friendly reminder, i don't think stockfish can even come close to the level of neural network alpha zero had. Stockfish is tactical, and neural network bots, Lc0 or Alphazero, are positional players
That's nonsense If you would work with chess engines all day, for years, as I do, you wouldn't make such statements. It's right that Lc0 was quite superior to Stockfish in the beginning 2017/2018, when Lc0 was a completely new approach to chess with computers. But soon the Stockfish team adopted the new technology. Stockfish 12 was the last version with classical, handcrafted evaluation system. Since Stockfish 13 the NNUE technology was implemented in the engine, and since then Stockfish improved it's abilities in positional play with Lightspeed. Today it's a perfect, or maybe better, alrounder Chess Engine, that can play on the highest level on every part of the game, opening, middlegame, endgame, positional play, whatever. This means, of course, not, that the engine couldn't be improved. Of course it can! But on this supreme level of play, there is no distinction between positional and tactical play. One demands the other, and no engine does this better than Stockfish, at least at the moment! Ask Jozarov, he knows more about the play of Stockfish than most of us!😊
Happy new year. I fully appreciate your effort and content. In order for us to improve over time, I was thinking that you would do one video on puzzles. For example, 10 puzzles from the super final on diverse chess concepts. Later you can cover them 'aka' give solutions one by one. This will give us time to think about the puzzles. Thanks.
Nice game! That positional sacrifice was beautiful.
I did not find the pause the video move, it was a fiendish strategy from the fish of course. Thanks Josip
Joz, you are doing a fantastic work my brother, much love and Respect. Big ups from me...and the rest of my team.
It's an incredible engine. Stockfish 16.
Great explaining of this awsome game :)
When i see this tactical display from the Fish I really wonder what kind of brilliant chess we will get when Stockfish 17 arives!
Shouldn't be that different. We would need something better than NNUE to see a substantial difference in Stockfish.
@@lethallohn yes that is true ofc, i ment more explicit that Stockfish in closed strategic games still loses from Leela zero and maybe SF17 is a bit better at those so the difference between them for closed games is smaller. In the end, at some point in the future..Leela and the Fish will be more or less the same probably.
Thanks Jozarov - a very unusual game.
It's contradiction to the normal principles of chess.
Normally the Black Queen being in such good communication with its King
and the 3 pawns in front of Black's King,
would make defence very easy for Black.
Dear Josip, i analyzed the game, and it seems that 25.-Nd5 was a heavy blunder.
Much better was 25.- Rad8, and there is no white win in sight, black can at least continue the battle.
After 25.- Nd5 the game is over!
Do the computers pick their own openings or are the openings chosen for them?
I like pause the vedeo great strategic game instructive geometry good analysis thanksMozarov for progressifchess
Much love i watch every Video
just a friendly reminder, i don't think stockfish can even come close to the level of neural network alpha zero had. Stockfish is tactical, and neural network bots, Lc0 or Alphazero, are positional players
Sf 16 is better than alphazero
@@Jozarovschesschannel wait actually? Damn A0 is really getting old... is there a place where I can learn more about A0 and its workings?
That's nonsense
If you would work with chess engines all day, for years, as I do, you wouldn't make such statements.
It's right that Lc0 was quite superior to Stockfish in the beginning 2017/2018, when Lc0 was a completely new approach to chess with computers.
But soon the Stockfish team adopted the new technology.
Stockfish 12 was the last version with classical, handcrafted evaluation system.
Since Stockfish 13 the NNUE technology was implemented in the engine, and since then Stockfish improved it's abilities in positional play with Lightspeed.
Today it's a perfect, or maybe better, alrounder Chess Engine, that can play on the highest level on every part of the game, opening, middlegame, endgame, positional play, whatever.
This means, of course, not, that the engine couldn't be improved.
Of course it can!
But on this supreme level of play, there is no distinction between positional and tactical play.
One demands the other, and no engine does this better than Stockfish, at least at the moment!
Ask Jozarov, he knows more about the play of Stockfish than most of us!😊