Will this be the most Immersive & Realistic WW2 Tank game?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
- Sharing with you all about @AcesandArmour and just some of my initial thoughts. More details below. Let me know in the comments below!
Discord - / discord
Instagram / phanphantasy.gaming
Twitter - / phanphantasygg
Music - share.epidemic...
Aces & Armour Dev Logs to watch
• Developing a New Mil-S...
• Tank Damage Mechanics ...
• Full Tank Interiors, I...
Let me know your thoughts on this game in the comments below. Are you looking forward to it? I hope you guys enjoy this video, and hopefully, Aces and Armour will be on your radar!
Surprised to see some coverage so early from some other TH-camrs, many thanks! We plan to go into more detail about how the gamemodes, specifically Realistic, will work, in a future video.
Will the game be on steam anytime soon?
I can’t wait to play this game!
I am very excited to play this game. The detail is INSANE! Full fidelity is amazing. I love ESIMS and Switch ology games. I'm getting this as SOON as possible.
I hope there will be a "Sim" mode that maximized realism to the point of near absurdity, that sort of stuff is super satisfying!
Please make it offline with bots. So tired of multiplayer.
After Long Years, someone wants to see Red Orchestra Features again. Wow.
God, I miss Red Orchestra.
@@nateweter4012 I miss the chill of being... Younger. Therefore RO is nice nostalgia kick.
Amen brothers.
Right?
Going full fidelity, multiplayer with AI and combined arms and showing off the pay model of a fictional game. Very humble approach. I take that totally seriously.
🎯 The GHPC devs making their limited scope and specific priorities very clear is why I felt confident supporting it early on. This seems like a pipe dream.
Probably a road map would be nice for them. But good point.
Our development process was not totally outlined in this video. It is segmented into various different parts that function on their own. We have made it totally clear that these different parts of development (e.g. Tank operation) can standalone, and thus going forwards our options are totally open in regards to scaling up or scaling down, which we have outlined from the beginning.
@@BurntPlaydoh exactly
yep, agreed. I do wish them the best but I am not convinced.
gonna be realistic when 4 player trying to coordinate in a tank and just a bunch of shouting
Do it in squad 44 alwaus a blast
Post Scriptum has that already
Try a game called Foxhole
You cannot run a tank without at least 1 other person
It leads to alot of shouting, chaos and very funny moments
Hell let loose
Red orchestra 2 and IL2 have some pretty good tank gameplay, with ro2 having infantry as support and il2 having aircraft. Both very fun
True though RO2 lack realism, armor, ballistics etc. when IL-2 lacks infantry - which makes it extremely empty and artificial.
And both lack proper transmission modelling. Steel Fury: Kharkov is still the best in basically every aspect except for lack of MP.
@bazej1080 Ro2 both has balistics and armor, have you even played the game?
Sure they arent 1:1 but they are there.
I'm an old school gamer, 53. I have been an avid WW2 buff since the late 70's as well as a collector and re-enactor. This is right up my alley.
I’m happy to see this dev realize how important it is for immersion to have detailed tank interiors but if it’s only multiplayer I won’t be interested.
it looks really early stage and the plans are far too ambitious, vague... hopefully project goes well and nobody gets scammed
It's not really vague, they talk about it on their website.
@@endi3386 Yes it is vague. Going from what they have on their website, it sounds like original Battlefield... but more realistic? Going off their discord FAQ, it's STUPIDLY vague.
@@rameynoodles152 It's literally not. AI Infantry from two teams clash on a battlefield, multi crew tanks and aircraft support them to complete objectives. As a broad overview that's everything you need to know. When it comes to more specific questions, they're answered loads on their Discord. I think you probably have a dumb idea of how specific you want the tiniest gameplay mechanics to be highlighted for a game so early in development.
Much too ambitious for Unreal Engine 5. This game will be DOA without its own engine, there is a reason why War Thunder is successful despite all of its pitfalls and it has to do with HOW the game feels and plays.
The intricate game they are proposing will fall short of expectation due to the use of unreal engine.
@@Avery-432 This is utter, utter tripe. You really don't know anything about game development do you? Modern mil-sims, whether their flight simulators are not, are moving to UE5. The only ones not using are games that were made 10 or more years ago like War Thunder or IL2. I mean look at Combat Pilot for Christs sake.
Where people get the confidence from the spout their inane opinions as if they're some authority I have no idea
every game should have options for solo players to have fun. in HLL i also play on my own
My wallet is totally agree with you.
It's been far too long since we've had a decent WW2 tank sim. Nothing has topped Panzer Elite. It's really too bad that 1C seems to have stopped developing Ground Wars.
"Steel Fury: Kharkov" is still the best. It has everything, realism, immersion, 3d detailed interiors with animated crews, realistic physics of tank drive, transmission, engine, weapon ballistics, realistic well designed missions, and the most importent - it has infantry.
Tank game without infantry is totally unrealistic, un-immersive empty shell. During WW2 infantry was 90% of the land warfare and everything revolved around infantry in land warfare. Tanks, artillery, trucks, aviation.
Lack of infantry kills great "IL-2: Tank Crew". I keep my fingers crossed for this new game.
OK. I've seen this story before, and I have some concerns.
1. Will the "good" tanks be locked behind paywalls that make it so that to compete you need the latest and greatest? Will the matchmaker (assuming there is one) be built in a way that also accounts for the rarity and ability of the vehices? Or, and this is what I would like to see, will you be able to select a specific timeframe during the war at which your chosen tank is present, and then have the matchmaker throw together historic battles in that way? Ex. Selecting to play January 1943 in a T34, then being put into a Stalingrad map?
2. Why is the Arcade mode necessary? There's about a dozen games I can think of off the top of my head that already have the "Arcade WW2 tank shooter" formula down to a T. With how the development seems to be progressing now, it looks like the game is going for high realism, so why foster an arcade mode at all? Couldn't development resources be more used on the realistic mode to make development progress faster and better?
3. How detailed will damage models be? Will APHE just be the end-all of tanks, like how it is in many other games of the genre, or will the shells act realistically? (HVAP really isnt as bad as many games make it out to be)
4. What nations can we expect?
5. As myself a modder for GHPC, what should I expect in terms of mod support if I were to buy the game?
6. How will kills on tanks be calculated? Will only complete destruction of a tank count as a kill, or will a mission kill like destroying the engine or the gun count as well? I very much hope that the latter is the case, as it wasn't particularly common for a tank to catastrophically explode upon being hit once.
I should've put this in the video, but here
USSR vs Germany Eastern Front late 1942 (initial release)
Greece/Britain vs Germany/Italy Spring 1941
US/Britain vs Germany - Western Front late 1944
US/Britain vs Japan Pacific Theatre late 1944
US/Britain vs Germany/Italy North Africa
and they have a full video dedicated to explaining ballistics and damage th-cam.com/video/BUnq3MkMoDU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=GUArgsJeTPddASxu
On the issue of 1, yes they probably will be. I can definitely see the tiger 2 and maybe even the tiger 1 being locked behind a pay wall as “limited edition” which is honestly worse as not only do you have to pay to play it, you also need to do it before the “limited” number is bought up.
Sounds really dumb and arbitrary to me.
@@PhanPhantasy Not France ? I'm sad now.
Sad how early WW2 is almost never showed.
I'm just bored to see the same nations since decades. I don't care anymore.
On one hand it would make teamwork with randoms hell, but I kinda wish Squad 44 took after this a bit more. That game already has the *currently* most immersive tank gameplay, but we can always go further
you get a lot of pseudo-knowledgable game people taking smack about games in development cause they've grown suspicious, and to some degree its justified. But the issue is these people don't know what they're talking about lol, they don't know what dev red flags actually look like. This game is ambitious no doubt about it, but the way they split it into three separate parts which all have their own development routes, and can function standalone is actually super smart, and means that no matter how it goes they'll always have something to ship, and if it goes super well they can scale up according to their plans.
I agree with you but we the people have a right to have critical opinions.
its going to suck because its multi-player focused, which means it will be limited 'map based play' instead of an interactive campaign. Multi-player sucks if it is the main design focus and not an add on.
@@tucsonbandit That's your opinion, they mentioned a singleplayer mission editor. Personally I prefer multiplayer games.
this game looks like it was a lot of potential
It’s like Squad 44, Warthunder, and Enlisted had a baby. Realistic tanks and planes like in Warthunder and S44, Ai squads like Enlisted. I don’t see why this game wouldn’t work other than the fact the milsim ww2 community is pretty small. It’s hard enough with most being split between games like HLL and S44.
Phlydaily, oddbawz, thecodmineman, maybe benny or mikegoesboom all in a panzer 4?
This NEEDS to be VR compatible.
FUCK YES
it'll be a ton easier in VR lol
Looks awesome and I hope they can pull it off, but it sounds very ambitious. I'd be interested in what they have planned for the damage model. Full fidelity is great, but if I can't see big holes in enemy hulls, or watch turrets go flipping in the air on a ball of fire, why am I even playing? LOL! I think it needs to go beyond just damage from kill shots too. We need to see tank tracks break and come off. I want to see dings and dents from small caliber rounds and ricochets. It would be so cool to head out in a fresh, clean tank, get into a battle, and come home covered in dust, mud, burn marks, dings, dents, torn off lights or cargo racks, etc.
im going to need a GUP mod within a month of release
I think by now everybody who is not still in their 20´s or 30´s should know what we can expect from a dev that only shows models to drum up hype. I mean, when will people learn?
This game is super early in development, what do you want? Everything to be finished already? childish.
Besides they already showed off loads of stuff other than the models if you care to look
@@abird6217 The only thing Unreal 5 is good at, looking pretty.
The only aces and armor I am finding online is the board game. If this is a small indie team I wonder how exactly are they going to go about getting high fidelity, and accurately modelled tanks and airplanes into the game.
Spell armour with a 'u' and it comes up pretty quick. They're not that small they're like 15 people and they've worked on some pretty high profile games in the past iirc
@@endi3386 "aces and amour" still comes up with the board game.
@@endi3386 YOU FOOL, YOU DARE ARGUE ON ALT ACCOUNTS AS A DEV??? I HAVE CAUGHT YOU IN THE ACT, YOU ARE USING ALTS TO ARUGE WITH CRITIZISMS OF THE GAME. ALREADY A RED FLAG!!!! SCAM WARNING! WE'VE GOT A SCAM IN THE MAKING FOLKS! THESE ARE THE SAME USERS, ATTEMPTING TO HUSH OTHERS. @Alexandros11 @endi3386 @AcesandArmour SCAM! SCAM! SCAM! @Alexandros11 @endi3386 @AcesandArmour
I enjoy games where you can engage in tank combat, targeting and eliminating their crew or specific components, similar to War Thunder. I understand the complexity of managing such a large-scale game but I really hope this kind of game comes in the upcoming years and maybe who knows even the popular Arma games will be changed by smt like this.
Also, I've been enjoying a game called Foxhole ( basically a top-down hell-let-lose or squad 44 with a global war going for around a month ) and one thing I hated there was you need players to play with tanks so adding ai to fill out the other parts when you cant find other players to play with really help a lot of the solo players
At last, for the devs please don't be like gaijin trying to mild limited/premium shit on their popular game war thunder as well as ruining their send game called enlisted which is so bd because they are trying to mild every aspect of the game as much as possible and I would love to support this kind of games and hope it becomes a good game.
Yes, I had to write a book but that is the truth and you can stop typing about me yapping.
Looks sick, not many tank sims especially ww2 ones around happy to see one being made with this much detail
Just steel fury and Il2 tank crew, steel fury being over a decade old and il2 tank crew being dead in the water and lackluster
While this looks cool and all, like with any other multiplayer game it has one fatal flaw: multiplayer i.e. other humans.
It will either be very niche so only hard core players will get a full crew and probably stomp everything in simulation or the "arcade" with AI involved will devolve into the usual multiplayer PVP cesspool like WOT or WT where even cross team chat got disabled.
for gods sake all i want is correct panzergrau im tired of the WoT light grey
Finally, a playable loader
That's so awesome, and only 15 dollars, when is the aproximate release date. I hope they add the m24 chaffe as either free or paid but not limited edition
Multiplayer only or single player with AI teamates and enemies is planned ? That would be nice not to be another one multiplayer only game, there is so much already
Multi-player with the option of teaming with AI or your friends to multi-crew.
It's all cool until you realize nobody will want to play the radio operator nor the loader and the Gunner & Driver in discord will not listen to that random dude jumping in the commander seat.
Well... then they will die pretty quickly and will perhaps be more interested in communication the next time.
Hence why they said that AI crew will be a thing
I am in, for no other reason than I have wanted to see the actual, period functional PzN II since I was a young teen. 55 now.
Have you not played War Thunder my friend? It can be found on PC and Console. Its got a crazy high learning curve but is well worth looking into due to its unique playstyle alone.
Its got Tanks, Air and Naval from major nations such as USA, GER, USSR, G.B., JAP, CN, IT, FR, SE and Israel all from WW2 to current era equipment.
@@Avery-432 Forgive my mistyped statement
I meant to say Pzn ll interior.
I was a beta tester for War Thunder and WoWS.
If theres free bushes this is it
I wish they would go for another way of making the rare tanks rare to see in a game. I don’t like that they will lock the most fun, unique experience behind a paywall for a few people only.
I’m getting Squad/Hell Let Loose/Gunner, HEAT, PC!/Enlisted vibes with a twist.
Thanks for the heads-up.
Oh god, thank you for giving War Thunder some conter!
The big question is can Unreal Engine handle advanced physics for armor penetration and how the vehicle handles?
I just want a modern day tank game that is fully modeled that isnt Steel Beasts, even though i just might say screw it and spend 100 bucks
Screw it and just spend 100 bucks 😉
@@PhanPhantasy fair might do me some good since I'm trying to be a 19k
@hellishcyberdemon7112 if you ever want to play, we regularly play on my discord and we got a bunch from different communities. Also, we do have currently 19K that are playing. 😀
Games like this always lack funding and publicity because the audience interested in high fidelity sims is always very small. Lack of funding and publicity leads to a lack of content, a stalled project (lack of development time, lack of developers) and eventually a dead game so It's easy to understand why everyone has their doubts about this.
There is a reason why no one has ever successfully combined something like DCS, Arma and Steel Beasts into a single multiplayer game, it's just not feasible.
If you had done more research, you would see it's not just a high fidelity sim, and it's not even close to being anything like DCS, Arma and Steel Beasts. It's more like JUST Arma, with a formalised gamemode, and a bit more attention paid to the vehicles. With over 10 years passing since Arma 3, that doesn't sound so crazy now...
@@endi3386 You want to know why Arma is so successful, they've got their own game engine. Real Virtuality 4, created by Bohemia Interactive.
But go ahead, keep telling everyone how Unreal Engine 5 will work JUST FINE with some extra C++ strapped to the back of it.
Basically if IL-2 met Enlisted, had an inbred child and created a WWII DCS, Enlisted type game?
looks awesome
honestly im skeptical. theyre not really introducing much new, theres plenty of ww2 games that already play like this, interior isnt everything. maybe if they made it VR it would get a bigger interest. its like remaking enlisted from scratch just so you can insert your talented 3d modelers.
also i heard theyre planning to support their dev by patreon?? that rn theyre just relying on some initial investment money from somewhere. that will not work out 100% especially that the team is actually quite big for being indie
anyways maybe im just drawing from my memories and emotions of being so excited about the ideas when i tried game dev, then realizing it takes more than my 3d modelling to make a game. or when starbase was gonna be the next big spaceship building game and everyone was so hyped only for devs to pause development to focus on making a game that will actually keep them afloat in the meantime.
money is always a big problem, rn i feel like theyre running on sheer passion. but ppl get burned out and become less productive and if they dont get paid, they will stop or leave.
Idk... Seems like the day before all over again
I'm sold.... will get this game
No, that title belongs to Red Orchestra 2
Is this pvp like War Thunder, or is the multiplayer more co-op?
Pretty looks
Will this game be available on Steam?
I hope this game can finally replace War Thunder, I'm tired of dealing with gaijin as a developer
Ha... Keep huffing that hopium.
Are it comming to Steam?
Thank God no ugly bump texturing on the outside😅
this will be pretty interesting
Make me think about red Orcherstra 1
This game being created on the unreal engine pretty much makes this a automatic no for me.
These types of games NEED their own game engine and physics models, otherwise you just get another World of Tanks.
If they want this to be a War Thunder or Enlisted like game, they are going to need to double down and create their own game engine. If this doesnt happen, I can assure you it will find itself in a very awkward position due to the competition on the market.
The only way I can see this sort of game staying relevant is if its released as a f2p console title.
Dude, I have no idea where you formed these opinions, but they are basically COMPLETELY wrong. UE5 is basically the engine modern mil-sims and flight simulators are flocking too, look at Combat Pilot. The only ones that aren't are either in Unity, or over a decade old and built with older infrastructure.
You don't seem to understand how game development works, you can program custom flight physics or whatever in Unreal with C++.
@@endi3386 Combat Pilot is not a game, its a project with no proof of anything working.
Try again pal.
@@Avery-432 Combat Pilot is a game under development. Their flight physics are already in a prototype stage.
Flight sims are not common games, hence why we only have a few modern ones at any one time. Your point is completely null, and you have zero understanding of game development.
@@endi3386 While UE5 is capable of creating a flight simulator, the engines used in DCS, Microsoft Flight Simulator, and War Thunder are more specialized for the intricacies of flight dynamics and simulation fidelity.
If your goal is to achieve the high levels of realism and accuracy, dedicated engines are more suited for that purpose.
UE5 is simply too broad of a game engine to compete with the intricacies of REAL flight sims.
@@Avery-432 You keep on with these boring talking points, you're flat out wrong. Combat Pilot dev team are veterans from IL2, and they switched to UE5, and know a hell of a lot more than you. What you are saying fundamentally makes no sense. Flight physics are coded in C++, UE5 has full C++ support, so there is literally nothing limiting about UE5 at all. You are a perfect example of how misinformation which makes absolutely no sense propagates itself on the internet.
Any game developer, (including myself, though I am a hobbyist) would laugh at how what you're saying literally makes no sense.
Alexandros cooking
how do we get this game?
As long as it's not a Russian developer I am interested.
'In game market place' I'm out!
Would be so much better than WoT and War Thunder!
whoa can't wait for mods to add anime girls to this one
ok this.... but in VR
Red orchestra 2
seems overly ambitious
bonus points to the team if they pull it off, but honestly expecting this project to lose itself and die off before ever being completed
I feel bad for the dev team having to deal with this line of criticism non stop lol. They said all over the place, the final combined arms idea for the game is only if the game picks up the traction it needs. Its split into three unique segments which are being developed to work as standalone games if needed, so they can scale up or scale down depending on interest and funding, which is actually a super smart approach ive not seen before.
@@abird6217 This "project" would have been a hell of a lot more believable if it wasnt powered by Unreal Engine.
@@Avery-432 lmaoo you are just everywhere complaining about UE5.
@@endi3386 Odd we meet here. No connection to the devs though right? Surly not.
Clear as day scam project, I feel for all of those you and your loser wanna be dev friends have manipulated into thinking your stolen sprocket assets are a "game in development".
@@Avery-432 I was already in the comments here because you are responding to me (and everyone else). Stolen sprocket assets?! Bro what? Do you know what Sprocket is (obviously not because that makes no sense).
Actually, my bad... I've just realised you're not actually genuine or putting forward arguments you think are good, trolling online is a hobby for you. Beyond sad.
Looks neat
Having a bunch of assets is far from having a game
Seems like a solution looking for a problem. The MP games will likely be empty.
Should have started with the game rather than the graphics, though seems the game is just the market owned by World Of Tanks.
Oh with Pay To Win to boot. Lol this is going nowhere.
online, absolutely nobody will take loaders spot, ever.
you can bet "special" tanks gonna be pay2win why else would you buy one.
So it would be similar to RO2?
I hope they'll have an M109 Paladin in the game. Always wanted get back in the self-propelled howitzer I drove when I was in the army lol. 😂
M109 paladin? This is a WW2 game my guy.
So they are just making the game Enlisted, but in Unreal 5.. rather play Enlisted tbh.
Correct. Unreal 5 ensures this game is DOA unless it goes F2P Console and even then its just delaying the inevitable.
I love armor but man I don't like WW2 stuff sucks this is their focus I wish it was some modern stuff seems like most tank games out now focus on cold war and WW2
I think there's more ww2 games out there, which I've mentioned in my video. And to be fair, there's only one cold war tank game that's ghpc at this time.
@PhanPhantasy I know and as a modern fan I'm left with very little
To have a realistic sim you need to have all the details about the vehicles. Most modern combat vehicle details are classified. That’s why you don’t see modern jets like an F35 in DCS.
@johnwicks4936 I disagree of course to make it 1:1 accurate sure but there is plenty of room in between and we have sims like steel beasts
Finally a competitor to war tunder
Wont happen due to being created using the Unreal Engine.
War Thunder is successful due to its intricate game engine, logic and physics that are then applied to models that were derived from life allowing each vehicle to feel different and have completely different utility. You just can not emulate on a engine that wasn't designed for such games.
@@Avery-432 Where the hell did you get this idea Avery lmaoo it's completely wrong and makes no sense. Plenty of games built in UE5 have custom programmed flight and physics model with C++, which is exactly the same thing that Dagor can support, it makes no difference.
@@Avery-432 ooo that’s a shame
@@endi3386 If it makes no difference, then you go ahead and tell me why the most accurate and most successful flight simulators use their own engines? While UE5 is capable of creating a flight simulator, the engines used in DCS, Microsoft Flight Simulator, and War Thunder are more specialized for the intricacies of flight dynamics and simulation fidelity. If your goal is to achieve the high levels of realism and accuracy, those dedicated engines may be more suited for that purpose. UE5 is simply too broad of a game engine to compete with the intricacies of REAL flight sims.
@@Avery-432 Your lack of understanding of game development is on full display. The reason why MSFS uses custom infrastructure, is because their incredibly ambitious goal of reproducing the entire world as a traversable map required a custom engine, not the flight physics. The reason DCS doesn't use UE5, is because UE5 didn't exist when DCS was being developed. Same with War Thunder.
All flight sims going forward that aren't being held back by old engines, are switching to UE5, for a very good reason. A programmer fluent in C++ has full freedom in UE5 to go to town with flight physics, there is nothing stopping them. Also, UE5 is incredibly advanced in a whole other number of ways.
Which is why future simulators - like Combat Pilot and Aces & Armour are going with UE5.
tank DCS
Multiplayer? Pass. So tired of everything needing to be multiplayer.
Yeah they literally said there will be offline soo...
Anything full fidelity should be for the most part paid for you have to understand its not pay to win its literally art someone has to hand make EVERYTHING and make it have a use and a purpose if war thunder can charge $60 for some trash rip off of a plane only quarter fidelity than games like DCS are justified to charge $60 for a full fidelity 1to1 plane tbh i dont care how much it costs give me the game ill buy the tanks in DCS ive never complained about the price nor star citizen you get what you get but star citizen is a little iffy
I was interested until i found out it was paid to win.
So.....
Standard would probably be as you said, Panzer 1-4s, Panthers (~6000 built), Shermans, M24s, M18s, KV-1s, IS-1/2s and T-34s exc.
Paid would probably be Tiger 1/2s, IDK for the US, some SU or ISU tank destroyers?
Limited edition: Jagdpanther and Jagdtiger, Sturmtiger, Nashorn?, M4A3E2 Jumbo, M36, M26, T26E1 Super Pershing, IS-3 (if they want to push it)
Cool of the devs as they try to recreate that ''waw'' factor after seeing something super unique and rare on the front line but at the same time, the tanks that are super rare IRL are the ones that are rarely depicted in games. Locking them behind a wall of ''first come, first served'' just ruins it for me. Maybe I wanted to play a Pershing with my buddies since we find the tank to be super cool! too bad, I'll only ever see it as a teammate because I joined the game 1 week too late....
As GHPC devs put it: ''we'll make the game in our own vision because that's what we want to make'' so all the power to Delta, I hope their dream comes true when they build up this game.
Pretty valid. I wonder what would happen if that player who bought that rare vehicle or tank stopped playing, and how will that be addressed? 😬
Your final point is exactly the reason why we'll have an in-game Marketplace, where players can sell and trade their limited edition vehicles. This means that limited edition vehicles will always be available, and changing owners, but the number of them in circulation, and their rarity, stays the same.
@@AcesandArmour Please don't, there are other ways to make historically rare tanks more rare in a game. Like maybe if one side is losing really fast or maybe if they're outnumbered by a lot, they get to use one or two of the rare and strong tanks to give them a fighting chance. This would allow more players to have fun with cool tanks without locking them behind a paywall and making them limited edition. (the point being that you could make it so only under certain circumstances you would see rare tanks in a battle)
And please add an option to host your own custom battle where you can change the rules and do whatever you and your friends want. (whether you want to practice, battle against each other, or just test things out )
An arcade mode seems like a waste of development time and resources to me.
Anyways, I have been following this project since the first devlog and I am really interested in the progress of this game, but I don't think adding paid limited edition rare tanks is a way to build a fun game and community that loves their developers. Especially if said paid items give an advantage.
I hope this is good constructive feedback even though I'm writing this at 2 in the morning, and I wish you all the best.
sorry for possibly incoherent email like text of an comment.
Please, god, no more war thunder/World of Tanks clones. Dont make me have to pay $5000 and waist 10000 hours of my life to get to the interesting part of the game.
kind of tired of ww2. we need more modern stuff. there's like 1 game right now that's doing realistic modern.
yeah, this never gonna be a game.
Fr... Seems like a scam to me
@@Aknayelth Not necessary a scam, just overly ambitious.
i smell p2w 💆♂
From what I can see, it's more like Star Citizen, DCS, and Il2 pricing model but instead, the common vehicles that we know of will be in the game for all.
With all due respect but I stopped watching till the word "multiplayer" was mentioned
Hope this game works out, if all goes well it will for sure shit on warthunder which would be a good thing
It's all a simulation, I know now
If this game is VR compatible I think I have my dream Tank game.
Hoping to see a B1-Bis at some point more than panzers though.
I do believe IL2 tank crew does have VR compatibility. Might be worth checking out and it's on sale.
@@PhanPhantasy yeh its good on VR but limited to servers as most still play just planes.
I hope so too, but if they do, they are going to have to work hard for good optimization with UE5. That engine is notoriously awful for VR and sim like this will be very taxing, especially if the environments are large and well detailed, which they will be because... UE5. I'm rooting for them though. I hope they can pull it off. I'm a huge fan of sims in VR. I have a racing rig and I'm currently working on a flight sim rig for DCS. I think there's room in my basement for a tank sim rig too. My wallet is another story though...
I asked them about french tanks and campaign, they did say they planed to work on that, you can be sure the B1 is supposed to come in one day if the game is a success
ill play that thing, im too tired of War thunder
I randomly came across this video. Not that my opinion matters much but as a customer I suppose it matters a little: This game is likely DOA, or at least won't see a great deal of success. This is simply due to market saturation for the "combined arms multiplayer pvp" aspect. Theres Squad 44, Hell Let Loose, War Thunder, Steel Crew, IL-2 Tanks, Arma, and to some degree Squad that all already dominate the Multiplayer pvp tactical gaming scene when it comes to realistic vehicles. However, when you look for single player focused simulations, what do you find? Almost nothing. You have Steel Beasts, which is the DCS of tanks but it is very expensive, is only modern tanks, and requires you to make your own scenarios or download them; or you have Gunner, Heat, PC! which his a very very good game but the lack of real campaign makes the mission structure very repetitive; and you have the old Steel Armor: Blaze of War by Graviteam that always had great potential but it lacks so very much polish to make it a good game. So my point here is there are multiple pvp games that do exactly what this game purports to do meaning the pvp market is over saturated. But the single player tanking market is actually starved for a good ww2 tanking simulation that has a good campaign plus mission structure. So the company has completely misread the landscape and thus , unfortunately, is highly likely to fail.
Mixed feelings, while watching first person view of tank I feel exactly like playing IL2 Tank Crew, except with some level of interaction. Also seems very weird to try to combine elements of rather arcade and wacky games such as grinding tank cosmetics and 'Limited Tanks' with its marketplace that feels more like buying CSGO skin rather than tank module with realistic vehicle interaction. I feel like people used to WT like gameplay won't find place in this game and some players used to some realism such as me may be unhappy with present grind and the way that limited tanks works. Thus, the mixed feelings. If it will be nothing more than shown in developer leaks, sadly will stick to IL2.
Clickable interiors are a little bit of a red herring. IRL you want to keep your head on the brow pad and use your hands to adjust what needs to be adjusted without having to lose SA. It makes sense for uncommon controls like sealing up for NBC, master blaster, or manual inputs to the ballistic computer. But for "live" controls you want to use all the time while gunning or observing, going "by feel" is the whole point. (espescially because tanks are quite dark inside)
That walking animation looks straight up like an asset flip
So will this be crewed by multiple players? Thats sick, i’ve literally only played a Roblox game that does this with realistic tanks
You mean Multicrew Tank Combat?
I hope the maus is not in the game. I guess that limited tanks would be the konigstiger or some tank destroyer beast like ferdinand or so. I would like to have real tanks that participated in combat, not prototypes. Game looks very promising
Someday someone has to make this, but for ww1.
I wanna randomly pass out in game cause my character got carbon monoxide poisoning from the leaky exhaust gasket
Really hope they really nail down the either solo or friends crew vehicle control since there is too many tank games that is just TH-camr bait that requires you to have like 5 people to crew a tank
Absolutely love it! Hope they achieve objectives and the game progresses fine.
Being Hitpoints based seems like a waste to be honest, makes the whole shrapnel/post penetrative simulations kinda redundant
Wait I’m curious but for the shells, after you fire a round will there be an animation of the shell dropping into the discard basket thing under the gun?
IMHO it really doesn't stand out, you're just getting a more milsim like experience and hopefully something that's not grindy and fun. It's plenty of games that already has FF tanks.
well it DOES
the only games with multicrew tanks are red orchestra, il2 tank dlc and steel beasts if anyone even knows that, let alone multiplayer
@@chaos..... It doesn't, it's already games that does multicrew this. The only way it's going to stand out is their vision.
@@subjectc7505 which is are
Sounds a lot like World War II online….which has been around 15 or so years. But this is much much more updated