There are single mothers everywhere - for some women with nothing, motherhood is a free ticket to a basic form of security. People are getting pregnant with someone they hardly know on purpose, it's pretty depressing.
It's quite often the same father & most/all of the kids have his surname...but he's nowhere to be found when the DWP are processing claims. I used to be a visiting officer for the DWP (Benefits Agency back then) & I still can't work out how CSA can't find these absent fathers, or why they can't sanction wages or benefits, to pay for their kids. I always thought if someone, who hasn't claimed benefits, has 3 or 4 kids & their circumstances suddenly change, forcing them to be a single, stay at home parent; that's fine- Pay the rate for their circumstances *when* they claim, until the kids are old enough to be home alone, a few hours a day. They can gradually increase their hours & reduce benefits until they're self-sufficient again. That's why the system* is there. A safety net to help people in a temporary financial crisis, that they didn't create. If they have another child, that's on them & their benefit shouldn't increase. We shouldn't be targeting pensioners & people with disabilities. *by the system, I mean out-of-work benefits for healthy, working aged adults, who aren't unpaid carers.
Don't get me wrong. The responsibility first belongs to the woman. She had the kids. But don't have taxpayers pay for kids that these women bring into the world when you can have them and the fathers take responsibility and pay for them. I pay for my kids and I shouldn't pay for these kids also.
I remember her. She was proud of having 8 kids. She received £100 per month from the father. She said, that she wants to have more kids. They all have the same father.
"Eight children, eight children, I have eight children, eight children"..... As if it's taxpayers fault she has 8 children. She doesn't care as long as she rakes it in, it's shameful.....
I agree with winslow to a point but I feel if you have 3 kids and are on welfare, then they should say that you need to get a hysterectomy, if you don't then you lose all benefits. and I disagree with the TV lady , that woman is not attractive.
Regardless of whether you have kids or not the safety net should be there to protect everyone, if you work then of course you should earn more than if you’re on benefits I think everyone would agree with that but a stronger welfare state is a way out of a bad job, a way out of an abusive relationship, and a leg up to a better society… I don’t think people should have kids just so they can claim benefits and then bring those kids up in poverty relative to other British children but why do we call this lady a parasite and not the royal family, or the companies that refuse to pay taxes while everyone else does?
Why is she got kids wheres the father why have kids she cant afford it if there 8 how many farthers please work look at all so weak stop paying for other people kids why its allways been the weak english way thatsvwhy england broke
She's not taking accountability at all. And did she really say that her kids will go to university and get good jobs, and that's how she's giving back to society? What a joke.
![NISAMANEE - TADA (ท้าดา) [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hcQHEPMmJpU/mqdefault.jpg)
There are single mothers everywhere - for some women with nothing, motherhood is a free ticket to a basic form of security. People are getting pregnant with someone they hardly know on purpose, it's pretty depressing.
It's quite often the same father & most/all of the kids have his surname...but he's nowhere to be found when the DWP are processing claims.
I used to be a visiting officer for the DWP (Benefits Agency back then) & I still can't work out how CSA can't find these absent fathers, or why they can't sanction wages or benefits, to pay for their kids.
I always thought if someone, who hasn't claimed benefits, has 3 or 4 kids & their circumstances suddenly change, forcing them to be a single, stay at home parent; that's fine- Pay the rate for their circumstances *when* they claim, until the kids are old enough to be home alone, a few hours a day. They can gradually increase their hours & reduce benefits until they're self-sufficient again.
That's why the system* is there. A safety net to help people in a temporary financial crisis, that they didn't create.
If they have another child, that's on them & their benefit shouldn't increase.
We shouldn't be targeting pensioners & people with disabilities.
*by the system, I mean out-of-work benefits for healthy, working aged adults, who aren't unpaid carers.
@@ShipsKat deadbeat father's such as the ones you describe deserve to be placed in workhouses if they refuse to pay for their brood.
All those children have the same father. Her husband has literally nicked off and left her destitute… why don’t we hate on him for that?
@@dmf1301Hardly destitute. We don’t hate on him for abandoning his family because it’s a lie and a scam; he’s in on the whole thing too.
SICK
If you can't afford children, don't have them. The fathers should be made to pay the taxpayers back.
Don't get me wrong. The responsibility first belongs to the woman. She had the kids. But don't have taxpayers pay for kids that these women bring into the world when you can have them and the fathers take responsibility and pay for them. I pay for my kids and I shouldn't pay for these kids also.
Why should the fathers pay? It is up to the woman to make sure she uses contraception like most of us women did
@@Popeye209Well. Why didn’t they use contraception?
I remember her. She was proud of having 8 kids. She received £100 per month from the father. She said, that she wants to have more kids. They all have the same father.
"Eight children, eight children, I have eight children, eight children"..... As if it's taxpayers fault she has 8 children. She doesn't care as long as she rakes it in, it's shameful.....
She got on the last show, and was proud of having a bunch of kids.
Learn to cross your legs, not spread them for everybody!
1:47 2:16 2:16 2:16
1:47 2:16 2:16 2:16
1:47 2:16 2:16 2:16
Damn, Brewer's honestly is something to behold...
PARASITES!!!!!!!!!! forced sterilization is the only answer.
Hitler got her to have 8. She shouldn't be allowed even 1.
Vasectomies 👍🏻
same thing in America .
How shocking that somebody has to work for a living.
She seemed shocked at that. 😂
Why she have kids when she has no job and expect the hardworking taxpayer to pay her luxury lifestyle
Hard working taxpayers are paying but is the government who support lazy people and unfortunately they are taking advantage
What happened to the dog that blew so many loads into her. What he isn't paying? Is it multiple daddy's!!!!!
:')
Your children are not my problem. Dead beat mother.
@Funnutter38the difference is that you have 2 kids. She has 8
Single mothers cost the country millions plus they all get a house or flat
I'm a single mother but I didn't get my house for free, I pay rent
So do immigrants...
Not anymore. The law changed.
I feel sorry for her kids , they have been born into this pantomime - they probably get bullied at school because of it .....
How many children would Phil be willing to take off her hands?
He would probably touch them up lol
I agree with winslow to a point but I feel if you have 3 kids and are on welfare, then they should say that you need to get a hysterectomy, if you don't then you lose all benefits. and I disagree with the TV lady , that woman is not attractive.
How do you expect the NHS to cope with that?
We know why she had 8 kids. She didnt have to work with 8 kids as the rest of us are paying her
Theres no insentive to work anymore you are better off on benefits
Worthless excuse for a person.
PLEASE CROSS YOUR LEGS!! DARLING 😊
Regardless of whether you have kids or not the safety net should be there to protect everyone, if you work then of course you should earn more than if you’re on benefits I think everyone would agree with that but a stronger welfare state is a way out of a bad job, a way out of an abusive relationship, and a leg up to a better society… I don’t think people should have kids just so they can claim benefits and then bring those kids up in poverty relative to other British children but why do we call this lady a parasite and not the royal family, or the companies that refuse to pay taxes while everyone else does?
WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD HUNNY
So long as we support the royal family financially, we can support single mothers.
what a bum!
maybe she should not had opened her legs so much...
Why is she got kids wheres the father why have kids she cant afford it if there 8 how many farthers please work look at all so weak stop paying for other people kids why its allways been the weak english way thatsvwhy england broke
She's not taking accountability at all. And did she really say that her kids will go to university and get good jobs, and that's how she's giving back to society? What a joke.
But can tat puszy was good
You are very disgusting. Ugh!!!!
good on her
What???
Rat
omg poor woman