Flames of War Battle Report - D-Day US Paratroopers vs. Fallschirmjaegers

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2019
  • Sam is back, this time he brings his D-Day Fallschirmjaeger and takes on Jon's Paratroopers using the new V4 lists from D-Day American and D-Day German books.

ความคิดเห็น • 90

  • @danielneal264
    @danielneal264 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Love these videos. Not sure anyone else consistently puts out better FOW battle reports.

    • @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall
      @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you!

    • @danielneal264
      @danielneal264 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall ​ I know you guys have to play the armies you have (like anyone), but I would be really interested to see someone try out the new Recon Company from German D-Day.

  • @jim8015
    @jim8015 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I can't get enough FOW content. Thanks guys!

  • @brett3366
    @brett3366 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Whew that first American para infantry assault was ruthless! 20:04

  • @soerenkepler
    @soerenkepler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    at 1:05 -ish. The jeeps being bombarded by mortars are indeed pinned, since they are unarmoured tank teams. Page 64 of the main rulebook

  • @jonathaningersoll6213
    @jonathaningersoll6213 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lots of fun to watch; thank you!

  • @WayneLeMaster
    @WayneLeMaster 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    An older video, I know, but I love watching these. Not a whole lot of players around my area in Indiana but I've convinced a few to invest a little into it. For now, just enjoying watching videos of others going through it.

  • @KonigPreuben
    @KonigPreuben 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These videos are great! I look forward to more of these videos from your channel. They've taught me a lot about the game and have encouraged me to get into late war and Flames of War WW2 myself. Thank you for the videos!

    • @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall
      @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Robert, Thanks and glad we could help. Flames of War is a fun game and a great hobby.

  • @philiphale2785
    @philiphale2785 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great batrep guys, great job. Thanks for taking the time to produce.

  • @robinpeat
    @robinpeat 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just watched this batrep a second time. A great game, very absorbing, thanks for posting these.

  • @My_Toy_Soldiers
    @My_Toy_Soldiers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Boys I positively can't wait. Looking forward to it as always John

  • @saintgordon6952
    @saintgordon6952 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great game, I always enjoy your videos.

  • @robertmoffitt1336
    @robertmoffitt1336 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love watching your FoW battles!👍👍

  • @onomatopoeia7505
    @onomatopoeia7505 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great t-shirt Sam! And a nice battlereport once again. Just a few notes: you can't swap hits from an artillery bombardment.
    Assaulting teams only count as being in cover when they start in concealment and end their charge in concealment as well.
    Regarding the bazooka in an assault, you now always roll against side armour, special weapons like panzerfausts and such no longer have a different anti-tank rating against top armour.
    At around 51 minutes, you hit the Americans on 5s, not 6s, as they are only concealed (they tried to dig in).
    When Sam charged the Shermans, he only needed to move one team forward. There was no defensive fire (tanks block LoS) and as both Shermans were bailed, there would be no infantry or active tank teams within 10cm at the end of the assault, with the result of the Germans automatically winning and capturing the Shermans.
    You can re-roll a Last Stand check if your HQ is close enough, so Van der Heydte could've helped the Jägers.
    And charging with StuGs... oh well, live and learn I suppose.

  • @mhnielsen1098
    @mhnielsen1098 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    1:03:15 Von Der Heydte is the Formation Commander, so you get to reroll.

  • @alkiskie8044
    @alkiskie8044 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sadly I kinda drifted away from FoW couple of years ago and since I moved, I have 0 people to play with anyway. Just dropped into say that those are some beautiful armies! Keep it goin

  • @e-4airman124
    @e-4airman124 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great job

  • @keithgilmour6857
    @keithgilmour6857 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great batrep guys!!! I really enjoy seeing these. I think as the German player, I would have started with both tank platoons in reserve and made sure to have the mortars on. They were your best weapon against the paras and they only got to shoot once.........

  • @AndreSilva-wp7ei
    @AndreSilva-wp7ei 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks guys!

  • @BurningBridgesWargaming
    @BurningBridgesWargaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful video as always. I enjoy everyone of your FOW videos, but the battle report especially. A note to the game. In the last assault where the StuG's fail their counterattack roll, you push back the PzIV as well. Thats a mistake. Only the original assaulting/defending teams can be forced to break off. Otherwise you could only launch 1 attack as the attacker if your 1st assault fail. This could potentially had shifted the game. But at I said in the beginning, great video. Both Sam and you are a joy to follow.

  • @corylains6510
    @corylains6510 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the video thank you!

  • @AlexbuilditProductions
    @AlexbuilditProductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the FOW games~ Keep them coming!

  • @e-4airman124
    @e-4airman124 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really enjoy flames of war!!!! thanks

  • @GhostMaker00
    @GhostMaker00 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't wait to watch the new Fallschirmjaegers should get mine today or tomorrow!

  • @philRminiatures
    @philRminiatures 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful terrain and armies, nice vid and great looking game!

  • @ratelmike8825
    @ratelmike8825 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well chaps Ive officially come back to Flames of War with Hit the Beach and the two D-Day books German and American. I really appreciate seeing your force display which help me see how I expand from Hit the Beach.

  • @memorarenz
    @memorarenz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great stuff

  • @ericstephens6979
    @ericstephens6979 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Battle Report.
    You guys do a real good job with these videos. Production value is top notch. I would like to see one of you guys run an American Armoured Rifle Co.
    Keep up the good work.

  • @soerenkepler
    @soerenkepler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Painful to assault unpinned platoons. Nice format - cant wait to see more

  • @My_Toy_Soldiers
    @My_Toy_Soldiers 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great stuff fellas!

  • @robinpeat
    @robinpeat 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent bat rep guys. Very educational.

  • @Mdhneo007
    @Mdhneo007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great looking board and minis. Friendly players as well. Kudos to all for a fun to watch, if completely predictable (my gripe with FoW and TY), match!
    When any German player is asked, 'what would you have changed tactically?', regardless of what they say, is actually thinking "brought Americans or russians." Lol

  • @Chrisbo123
    @Chrisbo123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome Armies! Really great looking! Sadly the german player made some big tactical mistakes but the batrep was interesting to watch nevertheless. Please keep up the great FoW Coverage

  • @daveb8665
    @daveb8665 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So fancy a go at this wheres best to start?

  • @Mightstone555
    @Mightstone555 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I believe that you are not allowed to make mistaken target roll when hit by artillery fire.

    • @CRAIGCHRIST83
      @CRAIGCHRIST83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Correct. No Mistaken Target with artillery.

  • @e-4airman124
    @e-4airman124 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    would like to see games out of the D-Day British and D-Day German books.

  • @dalelowery3164
    @dalelowery3164 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the content gents. Any ANZAC armies?

  • @slimjim7411
    @slimjim7411 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was concerned about 4th edition when they pulled their 21st panzer division products, and had no book support. However they've now re-released the models, and have a new book. So I guess I'll finally abandon V3 for V4.

  • @obxsocom
    @obxsocom 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice game, what foliage did you use on the puma?

  • @Mittens_Gaming
    @Mittens_Gaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good morning! How did you you do the red on th bases for the Americans? Also great looking minis and fun game!

  • @chriswiegand3549
    @chriswiegand3549 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    interesting you used roads in this mat. I have it and always use the printed one. I actually bought a different mat because i am finding that printed roads really limit set up

    • @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall
      @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I found the pre=printed roads limiting as well but I thought the look with the GF9 roads looks pretty good and you can still treat those printed roads as pathways or whatnot.

  • @pbeccas
    @pbeccas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great looking game.

  • @soerenkepler
    @soerenkepler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:07.35 - "Too i dont have gammon bombs" - buy them via the command cards!

  • @bigrob555607
    @bigrob555607 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice game very enjoyable to watch

  • @deanmarquis4325
    @deanmarquis4325 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes love these as well. The FJ player
    Should have had his mortars on turn one.

  • @GhostMaker00
    @GhostMaker00 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My biggest thing was the 888 placement was odd to me and the rush forward with the pzn 4s . Other then that great fight!

    • @apropercuppa8612
      @apropercuppa8612 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fratrick Feral They seemed ok. Given what he had on the board at the time and they could cover both FJ Platoons as well as harrying the Shermans, preventing a hard push with, or support of the U.S Paras.
      In saying that, I might have kept the StuG’s on the right, again, holding down the Shermans, and probably brought the Pzr IV’s in support of the crippled FJ Platoon and Pumas.
      In saying that, I’m sat watching and not playing, it’s always a little different when playing.

  • @Edward-Plantagenet
    @Edward-Plantagenet 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Think I'll be crossing Pumas off the shopping list LOL.

  • @Edward-Plantagenet
    @Edward-Plantagenet 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Think I'll be crossing Pumas off the shopping list LOL :)

  • @aliciawatts3356
    @aliciawatts3356 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Germans : I think the pumas should have addressed the jeeps...and play def. On German right.... using stugs to chase down arty... great game guys....very entertaining

  • @karltreier1122
    @karltreier1122 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You cannot use Mistaken Target to move hits from a Bombardment.

  • @slimjim7411
    @slimjim7411 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Must have changed something in V4 because your para's were inside the woods completely. So anything they shoot at is obscured and +1 to hit.

    • @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall
      @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, if you are within 2" of the edge you count as on the edge and can shoot out without penalty.

  • @soerenkepler
    @soerenkepler 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You definetely need to keep your company cmd close to your expensive paratroopers to keep them motivated. Relying on hot 3+ counterattacks is not a reliable strategy

  • @memorarenz
    @memorarenz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ya didn't miss the Navy Bombardment:D

  • @petepan82
    @petepan82 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hq can't be pinned down?

    • @onomatopoeia7505
      @onomatopoeia7505 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes they can be pinned down, but they don't have to test for Last Stand as they always count as being in Good Spirits.

  • @zxcvbob
    @zxcvbob ปีที่แล้ว

    30:45 "...and because he's HQ he can't be pinned down" What? I've never heard of this rule. (my HQs get pinned frequently)

  • @tacfamily14
    @tacfamily14 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do you roll a 3+ dice for your AOP? “Unlike other aircraft, AOP automatically arrives in your starting step” 🤔🤔🤔

    • @mhnielsen1098
      @mhnielsen1098 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They do not come in automatically anymore.

    • @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall
      @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the comment. I couldn't find it in the rulebook and so decided to fall on the side of caution and treat it as a 3+ aircraft. Still couldn't find it, page reference?

    • @mhnielsen1098
      @mhnielsen1098 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall "D-Day American" Page 3

    • @tacfamily14
      @tacfamily14 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      mhnielsen 10 gosh... tanks man... 3+ rather than the usual 4+ and aiming point within 12” of the aircraft instead of 16”!

  • @mhnielsen1098
    @mhnielsen1098 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:01:10 How can a LMG be long range?

    • @onomatopoeia7505
      @onomatopoeia7505 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If it fires at a target which is over 40cm away.

    • @mhnielsen1098
      @mhnielsen1098 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@onomatopoeia7505 What is the range of the LMG.

  • @deanmarquis4325
    @deanmarquis4325 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why would the German player want to bombard the jeeps on turn 5. How
    About smoke for the stugs

  • @Anvilarm07
    @Anvilarm07 ปีที่แล้ว

    Late mortars meant U.S. paras could run rampant.

  • @ratelmike8825
    @ratelmike8825 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    An amazing battle report, I'm no expert on the mission and V4 but Sam your 88s were poorly positioned. Apologies if have this wrong? Your battle reports are just terrific, painted models look great scenery how you go through the game is terrific. I have only one real criticism and this is the game in general. Being ex-military myself the one thing that has always annoyed me about the game since V2, is the total random deployment of objectives in missions. The objectives in my eyes are utterly meaningless. Now I have much to catch up on V4 both in the rule book and the intel books but I just see like in this game why were the objectives placed where they were? Was it a bridge, a vital road junction, securing an important piece of intel?? No it was just so random and I look at it from a military point of view, no soldier would want to fight over just some random objective in a field or on the edge of a wood. I know the game is very geared towards the tourney scene, which to me sucks but that's just me experience. I was very active in the tourney scene back in V2 but I never recall a single weekend having enjoyed it based on this very topic i mention above. But Im really enjoying your channel.

    • @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall
      @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a really good point that is hard to address in a competitive game like this. I think maybe having a third person design the layout and place objectives might help the realism but potentially play havoc with game balance. Thanks for watching!

  • @PanzerSchule
    @PanzerSchule 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really like your vids but gave up watching after 27 minutes and three adverts. Shame.

    • @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall
      @AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry about that. While I can control if the video is monetized youtube inserts the ads and having viewers watching ads is really the only way to support the channel at this time. We don't yet have other revenue streams.

    • @PanzerSchule
      @PanzerSchule 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall You might be able to set your Ads to show only at the start. I did that on mine before TH-cam took Flames of War to be ISIS and blocked me from advertising. I'll be coming back to your vid, don't worry!