Isn't the increase first doubled every time until a certain point and then additive? for ex., from 1 to 2, then to 4, to 8, until, say 10, after which it is increased by 1?
Both of the protocols are prone to MITM attacks. UDP does drop more packets but when it comes to security, both TCP and UDP work with the same security standards (most of the case)
You explained everything about TCP that a university(undergrad + masters) networking course couldn't explain to me in years. Thank you so much!!
I able to pass few senior level system design interviews. So a big thank you! 😊
Let's gooo! Congrats man, glad the hard work paid off, it was all you :)
Wow great TCP explanation! Learned alot that I did not know
Thanks for all these videos!
It is worth to mention that new QUIC protocol (HTTP/3 based on it) uses UDP.
Very cool! My first time hearing of it
Isn't the increase first doubled every time until a certain point and then additive?
for ex., from 1 to 2, then to 4, to 8, until, say 10, after which it is increased by 1?
I can't recall the exact semantics, I just remember AIMD. That being said, I'll believe whatever wikipedia says.
The AIMD methodology is used for congestion control. Assume a>0(usually maximum segment size) and 0
How much for brown showers?
Had to look this one up, am I paying you or are you paying me??
Is UDP secure? In other words is it prone to man in the middle attack?
Both of the protocols are prone to MITM attacks. UDP does drop more packets but when it comes to security, both TCP and UDP work with the same security standards (most of the case)
Agreed with the above but I guess https is meant to stop those
serverfault.com/questions/98951/does-https-use-tcp-or-udp