ความคิดเห็น •

  • @danielirvin4420
    @danielirvin4420 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you, very helpful to this very amateur geology buff.

  • @knightclan4
    @knightclan4 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent video quality and great details. You really love geology. I find it quite interesting also.

  • @mutualbeard
    @mutualbeard 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A late arrival to this video but appreciate it very much. I can see how Geology has been so influential in understanding the history of the planet and our place in it.

  • @frankblangeard8865
    @frankblangeard8865 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He mentions at 0:55 that this science is constantly changing. That's an interesting point. Geologists don't always agree. The story you get from one geologist may be different from what you get from another geologist. And if you wait ten years they will most likely have both changed their stories.

  • @aakanshabisht525
    @aakanshabisht525 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very useful video sir thanks for making

  • @poolman6898
    @poolman6898 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Australia geology is very interesting...

  • @hadrianopolis1968
    @hadrianopolis1968 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    4:55 I spotted the very annoyed spider

  • @shawn.bourke.3
    @shawn.bourke.3 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool thanks mate

  • @rahellf.9415
    @rahellf.9415 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks was helpfull

  • @adrianloves6792
    @adrianloves6792 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello is it possible to find amethyst on celadonite with chalcedony layers and the amethyst with goethite inclusions above the north end of Thirroul beach just before austinmer beach in the cliff layers above the Permian and tongara coalmeasures and maybe above the tufatios layers
    As I did find one today after watching some of your videos and getting inspired to go look

  • @Skuxley
    @Skuxley 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey have you got any videos on quarantine bay turbidites ?

  • @osamaosman9099
    @osamaosman9099 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is reason for cross bedding in siltstone

  • @user-ct8jn8zq3i
    @user-ct8jn8zq3i 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yea lessss get it GLGY 377 #ALAN #HILDEBRAND

  • @StereoSpace
    @StereoSpace 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can we interpret the varved members as glacial environments, and the thicker sediment members as interglacials?
    Ice covered bays would have very little sediment input with no wave action, so thin laminae laid very precisely with no bio activity.
    During the interglacial periods, after the ice melts off, lots of sediment would wash into the bays. During floods, some oxidized red-bed material would be carried in as well.
    How's that for my completely amateur interpretation?

    • @philbox4566
      @philbox4566 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I suspect that these sediments are all riverine in nature. Thing is though that this sandstone province is vast. Parts of it extend up into central Queensland which is some 1.500 kilometres from where this video was shot. who can say though whether it was the same river system though.

  • @fretournoriazoro1165
    @fretournoriazoro1165 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good day sir, I tried to pulverised mudstone and made them to a pieces of concrete hollow block and I found it so good and very hard.what can you say my experiment sir,is it applicable? Nice too hear your answer sir..thank you!…if possible i will make a video too.

  • @pietpanzerpanzer5335
    @pietpanzerpanzer5335 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know i am 6 years to late bit can you give references to the timeframe you a looking on or maybe even show how far away it is from know events like the perm trias extinction?

  • @narendramakwana8429
    @narendramakwana8429 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there any gold

  • @poolman6898
    @poolman6898 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any chevrons?...

  • @hikerJohn
    @hikerJohn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @ 4:32 I dont believe those thin layers represent YEARS but more likely just waves of materials that could have been minutes or hours apart with wave after wave of material deposition. There's no way for that to be such perfect deposition year after year after year and all be almost exactly the same from year to year but starts one moment and ends decades later as abruptly as it started. Look at all the layers with Mount Saint Helens that are hundreds of feet thick that happened in minutes and days. This is no way decades of exactly the same material and then a line of totaly different material right on top that was deposited for decades and then changed abruptly again.

  • @redhaze8080
    @redhaze8080 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:55 totally triggered ;)

  • @policematrixx
    @policematrixx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    whole thing made in a matter of days during the great flood

    • @bradweir6993
      @bradweir6993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cheese n rice get a life!

    • @BlGGESTBROTHER
      @BlGGESTBROTHER 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How would a flood create differing sedimentary structures stacked one on the other? That literally makes no sense.

    • @liamhackett513
      @liamhackett513 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BlGGESTBROTHER there is a creationist geology channel somewhere on TH-cam. I think some of them may even be geologists. One guy was explaining in a lecture that the Grand Canyon was a miracle akin to to the fishes and loaves. A test of faith,,, the Grand Canyon?. It's seems the science is deliberately leading people astray from heeding the scripture and the word of God. It's obvious they aren't very pleased that the literalness of the Holy book is being undermined by godless science. The only thing that this stuff would test would be your patience. Switched it off after 2 minutes.

    • @BlGGESTBROTHER
      @BlGGESTBROTHER 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@liamhackett513 Jeeze... I don't even know why believers go to such lengths, like denying mainstream science, just to protect their beliefs. Last time I checked, there's nothing in the Bible that says you have to be a fundamentalist young earther in order to be a Christian. In fact, some of the greatest scientists have been people of faith. I'll just never understand why some people insist that religious faith and science are at odds with one another.

  • @Jason1975ism
    @Jason1975ism 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is a classic turbidity current. See greywacke.

  • @randyknecht1
    @randyknecht1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is well known that the way this occurred was by means of water, the flood of Noahs day explains it all. For any who disagree, explain why there are countless fish fossils found on the tops of mountains, and countless tropical plant fossils found at the north and south poles. You also find that the heaviest material is found on the bottom, and the lightest material is found on the very top. That would only happen during all the materials falling all at once in water. Then the weight of the water crushed it all together into what you see here in this video.

  • @knightclan4
    @knightclan4 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s not that difficult when understood as the result of a single catastrophic global flood that took only a year to produce. Way to many of geology’s anomalies can be explained by the flood of Noah. For example take folded mountains, check Google images for folded or bent rock layers. Do you really think that you can bend all the layers without breaking at the folds. All layers had to be soft at the same time for the bending that I see worldwide. It makes geology very simple and life changing leading to scripture being true , thus the possibility that Christ was who he said he was. God wants none to perish but will not force anyone to love him. You must realize you need his free gift of salvation before you can accept the gift.
    It will make you look at the rocks in a whole new light.
    God judged the world once because of evil and promised to do it again in the future. If you can see the global flood as a real event , then you can see your need for the savior.

    • @bradweir6993
      @bradweir6993 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      All the knowledge in the world is of no use to fools. THATS YOU

  • @narendramakwana8429
    @narendramakwana8429 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there any gold