I have built a few classical guitars, all traditional solid top fan brace instruments other than my one attempt at a double top. This was inspired by a brief twiddle on David Russell’s Dammann guitar. It was quite simply incredible. Power and volume yes, but with a dark and complex sound as well. Dammann is just a great guitar builder; his early traditional instruments sound amazing as well. To dismiss these modern designs without playing a variety, or more importantly listening to them being played by top class musicians is foolish.
Greatfull Quingchuan!!….ich verstehe kein Wort, doch ich kann mich ja immerzu glücklich schätzen, ein persönliches Gespräch und Beratung zu erhalten⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
It’s sad to see some people actually succumbs to the faulty design, because it limits the full spectrum of beautiful classic Spanish guitar, the double top design has big sound but that’s where it stops! There’s no harmonics extension, all notes are muddled like wolf notes everywhere. This video makes this design sounds very mysterious without practical context. 这个短片介绍太过夸张，使用神秘语气 把 一个平平无奇的双面板吉他说到天花龙凤，没有实际的深入探讨 音色 优势何在。除了大音量之外 毫无可取。
Even a cheaper guitar (a 500$) copes with all the musical tasks. Well MAAAYBE it wouldn't give you the neccessary sonority, but are you serious, man or Ms.?;) Are you ready to pay several thousand dollars to get the extra sound power only? Instead of having one expensive guitar I decided to get three cheap ones and I am happy. They are all different - for different styles of classical stuff, they are super comfy to deal with. So what else do you need?
That is a pity guitar repertoire isn't of an equal rank as famous luthiers' guitars are. So, no sense at all to play an expensive guitar. A 800-1000(max) dollar guitar easily does the job.
Interesting logic. Would you then agree that, given the paucity of the cello repertoire, it was futile for Rostropovich to bother playing whatever scores were available on his Duport Stradivarius? I thought not.
And the oft repeated limited repertoire statement is simply nonsense. The classical guitar has a huge repertoire consisting of pieces written for guitar and transcriptions of music for other instruments. It’s frustrating to hear the same the same old arguments rehashed with little justification.
I have built a few classical guitars, all traditional solid top fan brace instruments other than my one attempt at a double top. This was inspired by a brief twiddle on David Russell’s Dammann guitar. It was quite simply incredible. Power and volume yes, but with a dark and complex sound as well. Dammann is just a great guitar builder; his early traditional instruments sound amazing as well. To dismiss these modern designs without playing a variety, or more importantly listening to them being played by top class musicians is foolish.
Greatfull Quingchuan!!….ich verstehe kein Wort, doch ich kann mich ja immerzu glücklich schätzen, ein persönliches Gespräch und Beratung zu erhalten⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
It’s sad to see some people actually succumbs to the faulty design, because it limits the full spectrum of beautiful classic Spanish guitar, the double top design has big sound but that’s where it stops! There’s no harmonics extension, all notes are muddled like wolf notes everywhere. This video makes this design sounds very mysterious without practical context. 这个短片介绍太过夸张，使用神秘语气 把 一个平平无奇的双面板吉他说到天花龙凤，没有实际的深入探讨 音色 优势何在。除了大音量之外 毫无可取。
The masters apprentice has a legacy of orders to complete! A trade shop of this quality is a profession of heart and spirit.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Where can I buy one
老師 有沒有其他推薦的雙面板?
Even a cheaper guitar (a 500$) copes with all the musical tasks. Well MAAAYBE it wouldn't give you the neccessary sonority, but are you serious, man or Ms.?;) Are you ready to pay several thousand dollars to get the extra sound power only? Instead of having one expensive guitar I decided to get three cheap ones and I am happy. They are all different - for different styles of classical stuff, they are super comfy to deal with. So what else do you need?
That is a pity guitar repertoire isn't of an equal rank as famous luthiers' guitars are. So, no sense at all to play an expensive guitar. A 800-1000(max) dollar guitar easily does the job.
Interesting logic. Would you then agree that, given the paucity of the cello repertoire, it was futile for Rostropovich to bother playing whatever scores were available on his Duport Stradivarius? I thought not.
And the oft repeated limited repertoire statement is simply nonsense. The classical guitar has a huge repertoire consisting of pieces written for guitar and transcriptions of music for other instruments. It’s frustrating to hear the same the same old arguments rehashed with little justification.
什麼都沒說啊！裝腔作勢賣關子。你真知道點什麼？