@@edwardgorecki7728 I'm not Muslim, but I'm part of a religion that uses the same main book. I have much to say on this topic. I'm a Qur'anist, and out of respect for all the rules Muslims have for who can call themselves Muslim I do not identify as nor do I claim I'm a Muslim, but please read on. The Islamic world prior to October 7th 2023 was actually starting to go against the whole totalitarian theocracy thing because their main enemy, the West, was no longer present as an occupying force anywhere in the Islamic world (despite some bases). We were almost about to see a re-awakening of secularism in the Muslim world. Noe, secularism is taboo again. I am currently (though I have reading disabilities) trying to see how the European (and especially the Jewish [Jews have an equivalent of politicized Sharia called the Halakha]) Enlightenment made Europe secular, but it seems to be behind an encyclopedic text wall, which I am barely even starting to read. I'm starting to read Voltaire's treatise on toleration, next month I'll get Joh Locke's. I'm really just trying to help, I can stand seeing theocracy ruining lives around the world just because people are certain of their specific SECT of each religion, which often goes to something Martin Luther scathingly referred to as: "What have I done? There are now as many religions as there are heads! In other words this is the ticket to religious freedom." Voltaire also says that one of the Huguenots were discriminated against and that one family was blamed for a suicide and they were all put to death. Scary thing religious intolerance, I say it should go on the ash-heap of History the way George H. W. Bush tore down the Berlin wall.
The 'offended' woman disregards the fact that she is in Judeo - Christian America making her declarations of independence which would not be tolerated in most muslim countries.
It is important to note that Surah 2:256, (there is no compulsion in Islam) was abrogated when Mahomet called to fight the people of the Book. (Surah 9:29). This is noted in the Islamic sources and Tasfir. We need to be aware that many of the so-called peaceful (Meccan) verses were later abrogated by more violent and confrontational verses (Medinan).
@@tboss6689 and that isn’t in the Quran. Don’t blame the religion. Blame the corruption, just like Christianity theirs been many many deaths in the name of Christianity. Don’t blame religion, blame peoples corruption
@@uhhcoolstory5627 Actually ,no there are no Christians who commit terrorism in the name of religion . you never heard a Christian blowing up something or someone and shouting some reference to Jesus Christ of Christianity . Only in Islam ,after they blow up or kill innocent people do they shout Allah Akbar !!
@@tboss6689 You are fundamentally correct… but you also have to acknowledge that evil has been done in the name of Christ [by people who are “religious nut jobs”] there have been abortion clinics blown up by “Christians” Correct? Then Of course the “crusades”… but again the point Denis is making is that IF you have a correct understanding of the Bible you can not condone murder… the Muslim gentleman claims the same for Islam… but that seems less accurate
@@Studio51media when you speak at the crusades , it was a religious war on both sides . Christians vs Muslims , about abortion clinics ,it wasnt a religious thing, it was just 1 or 2 people who believed it to be wrong. it wasnt on a mass scale !
I find it interesting how so many people don't believe that a conversation on theology can even BE rational. Let's debate the points at hand instead of getting caught at each other's throats at only the surface level of analysis (i.e. religion vs science). There is merit to these discussions and we should all discuss the matters rationally.
Christian America invited everyone into the American schools. the atheist kicked everyone out,and are at the doors like the fascist leftist Nazis they are.
If there were less people like Prager the world would be a better place. He seems to have this outlook where his opinion supercedes anybody else's. What a moron.
I'm not Muslim, but I'm part of a religion that uses the same main book. I have much to say on this topic. I'm a Qur'anist, and out of respect for all the rules Muslims have for who can call themselves Muslim I do not identify as nor do I claim I'm a Muslim, but please read on. The Islamic world prior to October 7th 2023 was actually starting to go against the whole totalitarian theocracy thing because their main enemy, the West, was no longer present as an occupying force anywhere in the Islamic world (despite some bases). We were almost about to see a re-awakening of secularism in the Muslim world. Noe, secularism is taboo again. I am currently (though I have reading disabilities) trying to see how the European (and especially the Jewish [Jews have an equivalent of politicized Sharia called the Halakha]) Enlightenment made Europe secular, but it seems to be behind an encyclopedic text wall, which I am barely even starting to read. I'm starting to read Voltaire's treatise on toleration, next month I'll get Joh Locke's. I'm really just trying to help, I can stand seeing theocracy ruining lives around the world just because people are certain of their specific SECT of each religion, which often goes to something Martin Luther scathingly referred to as: "What have I done? There are now as many religions as there are heads! In other words this is the ticket to religious freedom." Voltaire also says that one of the Huguenots were discriminated against and that one family was blamed for a suicide and they were all put to death. Scary thing religious intolerance, I say it should go on the ash-heap of History the way George H. W. Bush tore down the Berlin wall.
I like the way this man talks of an Isrealie warrior committing war crimes when Isreal was attacked by 5 Arab nations and Isreal was outnumbered and were threathed with total anulliation .
That always makes me laugh too. 5 countries attacked one country and lost. Then tried to make demands as if they won. You cant make that up. Im willing to be that most pro Palestinian people in yhe west have no idea how that happened.
Denis has an agenda. That is to make sure Islam and Muslims are seen in a particular manner. His views clearly show that. Violence has never been committed in a manner by a people worse it is done in the modern times. Nuclear bombs. Tell Denis to Justify that. There is no moral justification for it. Innocent civilians were killed.
American here. I pray - most sincerely - that it's true that the changes in the US will inspire and affect the UK as well. I want Britain to go back to being British.
More like a CANCER that resists standard treatments, and, that the doctors/patients are UNWILLING to administer the NECESSARILY AGGRESSIVE treatments for. 😏
The Muslim is sadly unable to face the truth of his own faith. His comments regarding the Christians and other faith traditions being "preserved" fails to share that those groups were preserved through a system of "tribute" they were required to pay for their "preservation". The tribute was nothing more than a system of bribery and extortion like the "insurance" payments collected by the Mafia in some of America' largest cities. Rather than acknowledging what was put in front of him, he chose to recite the historical failings of other groups to divert attention from his own faith because he simply cannot stand the truth.
He literally condemned many Muslims country’s and also brought up other Muslim country’s that were actually good and respected other religions. Watch the video
@@uhhcoolstory5627 Mahomet did not respect other religions. Islam holds in contempt and provides no respect for other religions. Surah 9: 29 is a testament to that.
@@lifemaverick6427 if that was true, then the Jews would have never had their Golden age within Iberian Chaliphate. Educate your sorry self. Christianity and Judaism are considered people of the book, special status.
@@LARESCIV Educate yourself, Mahomet never respected other religions - he strategically 'tolerated' them until he could find a way to subjugate, enslave, compel or tax them. You're saying when Mahomet destroyed over 300 idols with a stick that he was respecting the polytheists? According to Ibn Ishaq, Mahomet reviled other people's religion and insulted their gods - thus the reason why he was thrown out of Mecca.
Now, "my sharia is obeying the American Constitution" is an unexpected surprising concept to me because Linda Sarsower publicly yell at US that "Muslims are not here to submit to any constitution..." or something of the like.
@@malar4722 There are many things that are similar between Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Contrary to the popular belief Islam and Judaism have more common than Judaism and Christianity.
Dennis, as a Western woman, I respectfully disagree that a woman in a mini-skirt is less outrageous than a woman in a veil. They are part and parcel of the same thing. Women receive messages from a very young age to expose themselves. You see preschool girls twerking. The entertainment industry continues to objectify women and create pressure for women to use their bodies to get attention as sex objects. Mr. Al-Marayati is spot on with this issue.
“You can prove murder in the name of Christianity is unChristian and get Christians to change because Jesus did not murder. You cannot prove murder in the name of Islam is unIslamic and get Muslims to change because Muhammad murdered his enemies and detractors.” -Kevin Everett FitzMaurice
Did he murder every single man in makkah and taif who oppossed in when he took the city. Now, he spared them even though they were his worst enemies. They killed his daughter and uncle and yet he spared them and showed mercy to them. He only had those killed who were deemed a very major threat and might have destroyed him if he did not act. Every government in the world does that. So you "quote" is just a pile of dogshit and im pretty sure you liked it yourself
Learn why the battles happened… Christianity doesn’t allow you to kill people who attack you or attack in the name of the religion. Islam can let you kill someone if they are trying to kill you
@@uhhcoolstory5627 So that's why that muslim beheaded an old lady as she exited the church in Nice in October 2020? Without counting the three other dead?
They should have Brigitte Gabriel or any ex Muslim- the Apostate Prophet, Nonie Darwish, Waffa Sultan, Ayan Hirsi Ali- to tell the truth about islam and sharia. This man picks the non violent parts of their book. But there is the military part, of conquest and submission of infidels...which they follow today.
If "Political Islam, political Judaism, political Christianity committed their own atrocities," then that's consistent with Psalms 53:3 "Every one of them is gone back: they are altogether become filthy; there is none that doeth good, no, not one".and Romans 3:10 "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:" Therefore, John 14:6 is absolutely true: "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: *NO MAN* cometh unto the Father, but by me."
When it comes to the hijab, the veil, and for that matter, the burqa, it is irrelevant which people of the world started it. There have been veils worn by women for thousands of years. These things are borrowed and become a tradition in certain religions. Symbolic fasting does not originate in Islam but it has become a part of Islamic culture in Ramadan.
+BaWare Yneb Let me see if I understand you: because I state that certain practices did not begin in the locations where they have found an established place, that means I am good with those practices? Do you know that burning at the stake was done as far back as Ancient Egypt. Contrary to what you might think, I am not in favor of burning people at the stake. You need to reread what I said. I think it was in response to someone claiming that Islam was not completely responsible for some dire religious practice based on the notion that the practice originated elsewhere.
@@WhtetstoneFlunky what you should focus on is regardless of where traditions started or not is what they do now , wearing the hijabs is MANDATORY that is what's the issue , no other religion acts like Islam today , most non Muslims societies do not place religion on the same pedestal as Islam does , in Islamic countries it's almost impossible to be a non religious person , in fact in most Islamic countries it's becoming more and more repressive , the fact is whatever customs were started they hold no sway whatsoever today in non Muslim countries but in Muslim countries these traditions or requirements are very much alive and becoming more and more hard line Indonesia and Turkey been two examples where coercion regarding these traditions are been imposed
When "culture" becomes a compulsory and repressive religious practice, it transforms a religion into a CULT. Islam - is a cult, and this is why it is so difficult to get out of it. Peace.
Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse." (1 Peter 2:18). This verse here condones slavery and is mentioned in the New Testament. Here is another verse from the Old testament:And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? 16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord. 17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. 18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." This here allows sex slaves of pre pubescents, advocates for killing of both women and children. This is all from the King James version of the Bible. Beautiful text!
The attempt to create moral equivalence between Israelis and Hamas is stretching things a bit. What does this Salam think of October 7. Is Hamas morally equivalent to the IDF? Is Hamas just nationalism or secularism? I would guess it is not.
I would transplant Expansion of Democracy for Colonization. Thinking that everyone wants democracy, which in itself is a dogma and a lie! Good points from both individuals! Without truth than everything is relative and permissible!
I suppose that the 50 Muslim countries were mainly converted by missionaries carrying hand puppets in their rucksack alongside with the scriptures. They got the idea from their holy books. It reminds me of Tom Lehrer and his song The Folksong Army. They all just converted people by preaching and entertaining converts. And there are minority religions in their countries like the Coptic Christians in Egypt. The slaves survived in many Christian states, but no one praises these countries for this accomplishment.
With the Bible, you have to invent stuff to make it sound violent and misogynist. With the Quran, you have to invent stuff to make it sound NON violent. Violence, supremacy, death, all those things are an inherent part of their scripture and it can't be separated from the actions of Muslims. Just the fact that you can't leave Islam without being threatened with death pretty well says it all. Even the most luxurious prison is still a prison.
The Muslim man makes some good points. But he is not using statistics but rather individual examples to create the impression of moral equivalence. Bill Warner uses statistics on Islam to characterize the religion in overall terms. And it is just as easy to argue for moral differences too. The current case of Oct 7 and the brutal attack on Israel and its civilians by Hamas tends to suggest moral differences are important. And perhaps we should see that the Nazis were not committing the Holocaust because of religious conviction, as they rejected Christianity. But the jihadis today quote their scriptures to just if their atrocities. In short the Muslim man is more an apologist than a scholar objectively summarizing the character of Islam as a movement in the world across time.
Mr Prager correctly identifies the obstacle within Islam that prevents reformation. He then opines that Islam can change and that, if it does it will be to through the efforts of American Muslims. Unfortunately Prager does not identify why Islam is entirely incapable of reformation. Here's why: Muhammad repeatedly insisted that he was NOT the author of the Qur'an. He declared that Allah was the Quran's author and that he had only taken dictation. That this was accomplished in a series of visits by the archangel Gabriel, who transmitted to Muhammad, Allah's words to be written down. In support of this claim, Muhammad declared that he was then and was now, illiterate and that Allah had miraculously enabled him to write down his words. Therein lies the immovable obstacle, fallible mankind is literally incapable of revising infallible Allah's words. So to revise the Qur'an implicitly requires that Muhammad's claim that Allah is the author of the Qur'an be rejected. In which case, Muhammad was either a liar or delusional. In either case, Islam's theological foundations utterly collapse.
Lots of Attacks on Hindu Community. I think people here are very much uneducated on Hindu Dharma. First of all you all need to understand Hindu History to understand What you call Hindu Nationalism and what we call Hindu Renaissance. Second Islamic Civilization 😂 what a joke. In fact I can prove that all the basics of Knowledge of maths, science and all fields has roots in India not in Arabia. Arabs got all of it from India and they credited it but when Westerners got this knowledge they didn't credit India. At last the women during Q&A is saying about veil in Hindus. I think that woman needs to learn about India's History that why it came in society. It was due to the Islamic invasions due to which women used to do Sati or Johar. And also Ghoonghat because there was always a threat of women being abducted as sex slave or get killed like in Taliban.
My man over here talking good bout his own nation's culture yet bashes other's and thinks Taliban is good represenatation of average normative Islam. Maybe less bathing in septic pits and more book reading would do you good ?
Sola Scriptura **IS** the answer, and so is eisegeses. We aren't generally advocates of by politicized Sharia, but we do argue with traditionalists all the time. We've got very modern attitudes but we're generally very socially Conservative as well as against the general notion of evil, which we must ban, and good, we must mandate. It's true that these things should be enacted on by a consular government, a form of government as effective and moral as democracy, and much more in line with modern Muslim thought (which is based on the idea of shura, but in a religiously neutral way). I don't call myself a Muslim since Muslims have lots of requirements for who is and is not Muslim. I do, however consider God to be the only God, no matter the language or ritual, and Muhammad is His prophet.
There is nothing good that Islam ever brought to this world. You have nothing to be proud of and you need a bit of humility. You wouldn't be able to have this conversation anywhere in the Muslim world. Respect is earned, not demanded.
Muslims invented glasses, the elephant clock, the first real world map and made many achievements in medicine by people like Ibn Sina or Al-Zahrawi or in mathematics by al-Khwarizmi and others. Also Islam improved womens rights when it started.
Well when the whole comment section is talking about Islam as a whole being hateful and millions of Americans also believing Muslims are hateful it’s not surprising to see him say that at all😂 we literally got people taking off women’s hijabs in SCHOOL and many merchants forcing women to take it off. Who’s going against who’s religion now
@@uhhcoolstory5627 You speak about people taking off women's hijabs - should I cite the countless laws which FORCE women to wear hijabs in some Muslim countries? Should I cite the countless examples of the persecution and criticism women around the World suffer for willingly removing their hijabs?
@@uhhcoolstory5627 If they want to live in the US, they need to respect US citizens and their customs. That principle is the same in every western cuontry where they come God knows why.
They may be coerced by society to wear the face veil in Saudi Arabia (some, not most), but they're not in non-Muslim societies. So I don't see what his problem is exactly when it comes to, say, American women who do so.
Iraq is the Babylon of old. Throughout all of recorded history civilized societies have had to fight off the barbarian hordes. Only now do we ask the heathen why he rages and offer ourselves up on a silver platter for the slaughter.
Denis has his own analysis of history. He is entitled to that. I urge people to go out there and travek around the world. Denis needs to go get a brain. And most definitely a heart
1:31:12 only time I disagreed with D and only time a agreed with what a Muslim said about dresscode lol Half of the people who are okay with women being semi naked in public are not okay with dudes being semi naked around kids and for a good reason but somehow they think it's different. Lol
He is not following the original teachings of islam. He's chosen to create his own belief as he cant comply and cant believe/accept in the values of old teachings. He will be answerable to those who uphold the quoran.
I just wish the people that sit down to talk or ask about Islam at least read a decent translation of the quran, instead of mixing things and passing them for verses. And if they are going to comment on Muslim history then at least, for God's sake, read from trusted sources, and bring your sources for the claims you make. About apostasy (because I didn't see Salam addressing this point), NO-WHERE in the quran there's talk about punishment for apostasy. The source for the Muslims (not all of us) that say that the punishment for apostasy is death comes from a narration (NOT a verse from the quran) about a person that basically committed treason (which btw in the US is punishable by death) and used religion simply to gather intel and then left Islam to share the gathered intel with the pagans in order to fight and exterminate the Muslims. That's the context in which that punishment was prescribed. Are there Muslims nowadays that believe that, in theory, this is the punishment for anyone leaving Islam? Honestly yes. Do they believe in applying it nowadays? NO. Maximum, and I'm talking about the more extreme opinion, they would tell you to simply keep it to yourself and not to advertise it.
I naively expected to see an open debate about the issue of Islam and can it be reformed , sadly but predictably the Muslim guy said NOTHING absolutely NOTHING , only played the victim card and on occasions brought in the racists card to bolster his point of view , he spoke but said NOTHING that would lead to the any conclusion can Islam be reformed , When confronted about terrorism in Islam all he could do was point out faults in other communities religions, excused radicalision on colonialism , brushed the genocide of 100 million plus Hindus by Muslims as nothing, had the neck to compare The sharia with the American constitution , refused to discuss the countless terrorist attacks in the West by Muslims in the name of Islam, No other religion can compare with Islam on the terrorist attacks in the modern world. Refused to discuss the horrendous conditions non Muslims face living in Muslim countries taking the Coptic Christians in Egypt, Yazidi in Syria and iraq , Christians and Hindus in Pakistan, Christians and Hindus in Indonesia , Christians in Nigeria, Niger Chad Algeria Morocco etc . No he spoke exactly like a Muslim incapable of criticism or honest open debate just deceit and avoidance of honest open debate, Finally congratulations to Dennis for his silence and ability to listen and respect the Islamic speaker as he spoke but said NOTHING.
“He spoke exactly like a Muslim” 😭 what? I wouldn’t be surprised if you were racist with that trait😂 just generalizing a whole religion when 3 million Muslims live in the USA. He condemned those countries you listed buddy. That was literally the first thing he said. He also already said how in one of the Muslim country’s in the past they said not to condemn Christians in there because of freedom of religion. He also condemned people who force women to wear the hijab 😳 it’s called blame the corruption not the religion
Any person religion that use violence to spread its faith and any people not tolerating other people's religion, should be condemned. Many members of Jewish, Christian and Islam are guilty of committing violence in the name of religion. Do not cherry pick facts. I am a Catholic, well Christian but I am aware of the sins committed by leaders of Catholic and Christian faith supposedly in the name of "God". I believe in God but the established religions are making me sick.
Al-Mayarati is a weasel. He will concede a little here and there, but it's clear he has something up his sleeve that he WILL NOT CONCEDE or even acknowledge, and that is that Islam is here to conquer. He is practicing the double talk of Taqiyya.
Taqiyah not “taqiyya” is when you can say you aren’t Muslim if you are threatened because of being one… Christianity doesn’t let you. Islam also lets you kill someone if they attack you because of it. If they submit then you can’t. “Islam is her to conquer” then why is it that you are supposed to respect other religions 😐 the first thing he talked about is how many Muslim country’s aren’t actually following it and should be condemned.
@@uhhcoolstory5627. There are variations in the spelling in English, including yours. My spelling of it is very common. On the other hand, Muslims ALSO practice Taqiyya TO ADVANCE THE AGENDA OF ISLAM. They are permitted to deceive the infidels ANY TIME, thus they use the tactic of deception not only to hide their adherence to Islam, but ALSO ANY ASPECT OF THE FAITH that might open the infidel's eyes as to Islam's intrinsic violence toward them and what the goals of Islam are ultimately about.
14:12 Men have rules on what they are allowed to wear and what not to show people. Your interpretation of it is just ignorance 23:00 Exactly, the comments are so hilarious. It’s like they aren’t watching the video at all 50:20 so far the Muslim speaker sounds more American than this whole comment section 😂 freedom of religion 1:00:00 not sure if even 80% of Americans know this 1:10:00 not one thing he said wasn’t peaceful. He’s more American than this whole comment section 1:20:00 nothing she said wasn’t true. It’s the whole point of Islam. Islam is a peaceful religion. Go against corrupted people not religion Watched the whole video and I don’t understand how people can be against Islam before and after watching this. Every religion has a form of extremism and terrible interpretations and corruption. Very sad to see so many people against religions itself and group everyone into a box
Is there compulsion in Islam?: Yes (apostasy, etc) Is there freedom of speech in Islam?: No (blasphemy laws, etc) Is everyone equal under the law in Islam?: No (dhimmitude, jizya, etc) Is there an open edict to wage war against non-Muslims: Yes. (jihad) These are the reasons why people are against Islam - it has nothing to do with the behavior of individuals, it has to do with the core ideology of Islam.
taqiyyah, in Islam, the practice of concealing one's belief and foregoing ordinary religious duties when under threat of death or injury. Derived from the Arabic word waqa (“to shield oneself”), taqiyyah defies easy translation. What part is he using 😂 he isn’t cause you don’t know what it is
Dennis right way is not for us all become vegetarians in the distant future. Right way is to turn away from the SAD= standard American diet. Go back to the diet of our ancestors when we were hunter-gatherer Lots of vegetables and some meat Intermittent fasting as that's the way we ate as hunter-gatherers and that's healthy for your biology. In other words yes meat with much vegetables no processed foods except this an the occasional snack. BUT I don't know how you started equating eating turning it into a religion. Yes some people turn feeding into a religion = Vegan diet, carnivore diet.
@@tomlee2065 the beautiful thing thing about Islam is that Allah swt never chose the Arabs to be the Chosen people, or the Jews or any people because of their race. What is your racist views of Arabs?
Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse." (1 Peter 2:18). This verse here condones slavery and is mentioned in the New Testament. Here is another verse from the Old testament:And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? 16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord. 17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. 18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." This here allows sex slaves of pre pubescents, advocates for killing of both women and children. This is all from the King James version of the Bible. Can you explain these verses?
There are too many Islamists here. I do not wish my grandchildren to live under sharia , I don't wish anyone to have to live under sharia, which is so cruel to young children and women.
Only ONE WAY,to the kingdom of God, to be born AGAIN by the Spirit. I'm thankful that the spirit of God who Jesus gives freeze us from all of this humanism and simply being a human who is trying to use some form of Dogma to please God. Anyone who wants to know about Islam needs to go back to the original story of Muhammad and they will learn that it was actually a cult priestess who wrote the scriptures that he used to gather his band of warriors and begin to dominate the Arabian peninsula. Islam doesn't have anything to do with pleasing God it has to do with dominating other people.
Sabine Hammer yeah and Dennis is aware of that, matter of fact, he basically says it. However, people are watching this video... I watched the whole thing, I’m trying to understand (Agree?) with the man on the left (of the screen LOL) but most of what I hear coming out of him doesn’t answer the foundational questions asked of him. I don’t think he feels he’s lying, but I also think he is evading... So a “waste of time”... hmmmm yeah I don’t know, really!
Have you read the Bible lmao? Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse." (1 Peter 2:18). This verse here condones slavery and is mentioned in the New Testament. Here is another verse from the Old testament:And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? 16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord. 17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. 18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." This here allows sex slaves of pre pubescents, advocates for killing of both women and children. This is all from the King James version of the Bible.
@@alikader909 Yes Al. I have read the bible too. The difference is that I understand it because I understand logic, especially the several forms of context. Your hatred is palpable. I'm praying for you.
@@cathys465 your Logic is that read that Holy Book and you see verses you don't like, yet your own Book condones slavery, sex slaves, murder of children and women, and so on. Ok you can "pray for me" lmao. Don't be such a hypocrite.
Let’s start in Genesis , concerning covering for women . Did God cover Eve from head to foot ? After she realized she was naked, not at all . Let’s examine Genesis , in order to learn every truth God lay down to Man . The best way to end all debate and speculation .
There are several types of Jihad though. The most referred to one is warfare one and usually it is the one referred to the most when talking about Jihad. I have no idea who raymond ibrahim is, bur I know robert spencer, he is an utter idiot, mixes truth with lies and is a conspiracy theorist, taqqiya is a thing mostly used by shia. Taqqiya as for muslims "sunni" is hiding religion and pretending to not be muslim for safety reasons. When you hear something against what you always hear about Islam from a Muslim the answer isn't always taqqiya it might actually be a lie for whatever reason as you claim it may be actually true and you're just fixated on some wrong delusion that this thing is like that in Islam while it isn't or it might be that the person you're talking to is a heretic and doesn't believe in certain aspects in Islam. Like for example some people deny Sharia and that is apostasy from Islam but they still claim to be muslim and may tell you that Islam means peace and love and flowers and rainbows and doesn't have war, he lied about Islam but it's cause he's a heretic infidel and didn't lie cause he is hiding something from you he did cause he believed what he said.
First really see what is happening in India without your Muslim Eyes. Indian State in Itself is a Hinduphobic state. See the treatment of Hindus and Muslims. There's no genocide of Muslims in India Instead Kashmiri Hindus are the ones facing Genocide. Nobody in this whole universe can say that Hindus are the most intolerant. We respect everyone good and expect reciprocity.
I love how Denis has issues with Muslim extremists and conflating it with Islam itself. I hope he does the same with extremist Jews and Judaism. I suspect he doesn't. Islam is not a religion. We say it is a way of life. Sharia Law is G-ds law. We as humans cannot speak on G-ds behalf. How about Israel and its actions? Will Denis critique Israel in that way.
When Jesus Christ returns to take up the crown of David from Jerusalem the Arab world will acknowledge Him as the Messiah. Islam will collapse as the false religion it is. It is Catholicism that will stand up against the Christ. Already RC teach that the ‘One’ building the Temple in Jerusalem is the ‘Anti-Christ, it is they who will not recognise their Messiah. They know not their Bible (as they don’t read it) or, prophecy.
Obviously a great conversation. Deliberate/labored speech flow conveys to me: hesitation and loose grounding in the argument. Don't murder. Love your brother. "Equity is G-d's value, COTUS is my Shari'a", NO, that's wrong. #StayFree
The notion that Israel is defending itself is as absurd as the notion that a rapist is defending himself from the victim, because Israel is the occupier. The middle east problem.....In a nutshell, it’s this: One side has been enduring displacement and occupation. The Palestinians, descendants of the ancient Canaanites, aspire to live in their own homeland, free of occupation and with rights equal to any other nation. They recognize the Jewish history in the land but assert their own millennia-long connection to Palestine. The tragedy is that many, including some in Israel, do not recognize the rights of the Palestinians to self-determination in their own state. This has been true since 1947 when the United Nations voted to divide the land called Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state. While it is often mentioned that Arabs rejected this plan, the complexities of why are seldom discussed. For the Palestinians, this plan was seen as partitioning a land where the majority were Arab, without their true consent. In 1948, as Israel was established, approximately 700,000 Palestinians were displaced from their homes, creating a refugee crisis that persists to this day. Known as the Nakba or "catastrophe", it is a sorrowful event for Palestinians, marking loss and dispossession. Years later, in 1967, Israel expanded its borders, occupying territories including the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem. These areas are considered by international law as occupied territories. Yet, settlements, considered illegal under international law, have continued to grow, taking more land from Palestinians. When Palestinians resisted occupation, their uprisings were met with force. When they sought diplomacy, the path to statehood remained elusive. And when they tried to tell their story to the world, they often faced deaf ears. For decades, Palestinians have seen their land shrink, their rights curtailed, and their call for justice muted. They have repeatedly asked for the end of the occupation, the right of return for refugees, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Consider the reality of life in Gaza. The blockade has resulted in a humanitarian crisis, with limited access to basic necessities, medical supplies, and opportunities. Yet the spirit of the Palestinians remains unbroken, their culture vibrant, and their aspirations clear. Think about these questions: If Palestinians were given their full rights and statehood tomorrow, would they still have grievances? And if Israel recognized the Palestinian right to a state and ended the occupation, what would happen? In the first case, a long-standing injustice would be addressed. In the second, a significant step towards peace would be made. Remember this: The land known as Palestine has been home to diverse civilizations and peoples for thousands of years, including the Canaanites from whom many Palestinians trace their lineage. Palestinians have a deep-rooted history in this land, and their aspiration for a state is a quest for justice and recognition. That's the issue: Why can't the Palestinian people, with their rich history and contributions to civilization, have their own state and live with dignity and peace?
Denis reading of history is from a purely Jewish and western view. You can tell from his opinions and ignorance. What is the history of Christianity and also Judaism. Did not David and Moses fight wars. He cherry picks history's events to suit his ignorant and bigoted views of Islam and muslims. He is a complete and utter waste of time. He tries to connect with the audience by conflating Judaism and Christianity. Please Denis, these two religions are poles apart. First of all Jews do not believe in Christ in any way whatsoever Islam and the early Muslims largely fought defensive and existential wars. Those times there was no diplomacy. In the crusades when the Christians took over they literally would kill everyone. Spain is proof of how intolerant Christians were. And most recently Germany is proof of how Jews and minorities were dealt with. The tolerance of Christians especially in Europe only recently has improved. Otherwise, Denis needs to get his head checked. In the US, the natives have largely been exterminated along with their culture. The blacks only got equal rights 6 years ago. Please be objective Denis. Don't live in your Utopian world where only Muslims have committed violence. Peace unto all G-d fearing people
![[UNCUT] เก็บ "สจ.โต้ง" เอี่ยวมาเฟีย รู้ตัวคนบงการ ก่อนสั่งลั่นไก I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 13 ธ.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/o-J_p62D40w/mqdefault.jpg)
Dennis Prager is a National Treasure.
IT'S SAFE NOW FOR THE JEWS CAN GO BACK TO EUROPE !!!! GET OUT OF PALESTINE ( ISRAEL) !!!!
Cannot see the reply?
Dennis prager speaks the truth, they (Islam)will not stop until they get there own way at any cost etc just look up history and recent events etc
@@edwardgorecki7728 I'm not Muslim, but I'm part of a religion that uses the same main book. I have much to say on this topic. I'm a Qur'anist, and out of respect for all the rules Muslims have for who can call themselves Muslim I do not identify as nor do I claim I'm a Muslim, but please read on.
The Islamic world prior to October 7th 2023 was actually starting to go against the whole totalitarian theocracy thing because their main enemy, the West, was no longer present as an occupying force anywhere in the Islamic world (despite some bases). We were almost about to see a re-awakening of secularism in the Muslim world.
Noe, secularism is taboo again. I am currently (though I have reading disabilities) trying to see how the European (and especially the Jewish [Jews have an equivalent of politicized Sharia called the Halakha]) Enlightenment made Europe secular, but it seems to be behind an encyclopedic text wall, which I am barely even starting to read.
I'm starting to read Voltaire's treatise on toleration, next month I'll get Joh Locke's.
I'm really just trying to help, I can stand seeing theocracy ruining lives around the world just because people are certain of their specific SECT of each religion, which often goes to something Martin Luther scathingly referred to as: "What have I done? There are now as many religions as there are heads!
In other words this is the ticket to religious freedom."
Voltaire also says that one of the Huguenots were discriminated against and that one family was blamed for a suicide and they were all put to death. Scary thing religious intolerance, I say it should go on the ash-heap of History the way George H. W. Bush tore down the Berlin wall.
The 'offended' woman disregards the fact that she is in Judeo - Christian America making her declarations of independence which would not be tolerated in most muslim countries.
In most muslim countries? Is there ONE muslim country where it would be tolerated?
It is important to note that Surah 2:256, (there is no compulsion in Islam) was abrogated when Mahomet called to fight the people of the Book. (Surah 9:29). This is noted in the Islamic sources and Tasfir. We need to be aware that many of the so-called peaceful (Meccan) verses were later abrogated by more violent and confrontational verses (Medinan).
Yet any Muslim who tries to leave Islam ,THE PUNISHMENT IS DEATH
@@tboss6689 and that isn’t in the Quran. Don’t blame the religion. Blame the corruption, just like Christianity theirs been many many deaths in the name of Christianity. Don’t blame religion, blame peoples corruption
@@uhhcoolstory5627 Actually ,no there are no Christians who commit terrorism in the name of religion . you never heard a Christian blowing up something or someone and shouting some reference to Jesus Christ of Christianity . Only in Islam ,after they blow up or kill innocent people do they shout Allah Akbar !!
@@tboss6689
You are fundamentally correct… but you also have to acknowledge that evil has been done in the name of Christ [by people who are “religious nut jobs”] there have been abortion clinics blown up by “Christians” Correct? Then Of course the “crusades”… but again the point Denis is making is that IF you have a correct understanding of the Bible you can not condone murder… the Muslim gentleman claims the same for Islam… but that seems less accurate
@@Studio51media when you speak at the crusades , it was a religious war on both sides . Christians vs Muslims , about abortion clinics ,it wasnt a religious thing, it was just 1 or 2 people who believed it to be wrong. it wasnt on a mass scale !
I find it interesting how so many people don't believe that a conversation on theology can even BE rational. Let's debate the points at hand instead of getting caught at each other's throats at only the surface level of analysis (i.e. religion vs science). There is merit to these discussions and we should all discuss the matters rationally.
@AWelsh Celt let me guess u get that from a guy who hate islam or media am i right
@@popolidah3899 damn did they delete their comment 😭
Christian America invited everyone into the American schools.
the atheist kicked everyone out,and are at the doors like the fascist leftist Nazis they are.
This is a knock out victory for the jewish guy. The muslim dude's arguements were all lightweight.
Mr. Prager is the God of common sense. He was asking the real and logical questions.
That's disrespectful to us as Jews.
This guy knows the answer to the question, but refuses to answer it. Go Dennis Go!
How about the violence going on in Europe, the high number of violence, rape, against women and other acts of violence as their numbers grow.
He condemns it🙄
@@uhhcoolstory5627 You can't condemn something momo prescribed.
If more were like marayati the world would be a better place.
If there were less people like Prager the world would be a better place. He seems to have this outlook where his opinion supercedes anybody else's. What a moron.
I'm not Muslim, but I'm part of a religion that uses the same main book. I have much to say on this topic. I'm a Qur'anist, and out of respect for all the rules Muslims have for who can call themselves Muslim I do not identify as nor do I claim I'm a Muslim, but please read on.
The Islamic world prior to October 7th 2023 was actually starting to go against the whole totalitarian theocracy thing because their main enemy, the West, was no longer present as an occupying force anywhere in the Islamic world (despite some bases). We were almost about to see a re-awakening of secularism in the Muslim world.
Noe, secularism is taboo again. I am currently (though I have reading disabilities) trying to see how the European (and especially the Jewish [Jews have an equivalent of politicized Sharia called the Halakha]) Enlightenment made Europe secular, but it seems to be behind an encyclopedic text wall, which I am barely even starting to read.
I'm starting to read Voltaire's treatise on toleration, next month I'll get Joh Locke's.
I'm really just trying to help, I can stand seeing theocracy ruining lives around the world just because people are certain of their specific SECT of each religion, which often goes to something Martin Luther scathingly referred to as: "What have I done? There are now as many religions as there are heads!
In other words this is the ticket to religious freedom."
Voltaire also says that one of the Huguenots were discriminated against and that one family was blamed for a suicide and they were all put to death. Scary thing religious intolerance, I say it should go on the ash-heap of History the way George H. W. Bush tore down the Berlin wall.
I like the way this man talks of an Isrealie warrior committing war crimes when Isreal was attacked by 5 Arab nations and Isreal was outnumbered and were threathed with total anulliation .
That always makes me laugh too. 5 countries attacked one country and lost. Then tried to make demands as if they won. You cant make that up. Im willing to be that most pro Palestinian people in yhe west have no idea how that happened.
@@Kunfucious577 I think your right.
It's so nice to see people with maybe different views speaking and acting like humans to each other
Even if one of the two is either ignorant or practising deception? !
@@albertblatherwick2048 who😂
@@uhhcoolstory5627 YOU
I love how Dennis doesn't hold back on what his beliefs are because of feelings.
Denis has an agenda. That is to make sure Islam and Muslims are seen in a particular manner. His views clearly show that. Violence has never been committed in a manner by a people worse it is done in the modern times. Nuclear bombs. Tell Denis to Justify that. There is no moral justification for it. Innocent civilians were killed.
I do too.
At 45 minutes Dennis asks a question which is avoided by his opponent.
It was a dumb fucking question 😂 has no relevancy to the actual issue
American here. I pray - most sincerely - that it's true that the changes in the US will inspire and affect the UK as well. I want Britain to go back to being British.
I don’t think you can say that those who gave up freely, are the same as those who put up comparable defence should be considered the same.
Islam will stand like a firm tree in tough winds.
More like a CANCER that resists standard treatments, and, that the doctors/patients are UNWILLING to administer the NECESSARILY AGGRESSIVE treatments for. 😏
No matter who these apologist are, their main objective is to sanitise islam
I wish more people knew that.
Its taqiyya to further the cause.
Y, silver tongued snake. #StayFree
Better to be unsanitary, eh.
45:44 What would increase kindness on earth. If we all became amish ! 😄
Amish don't want anyone. #StayFree
The Muslim is sadly unable to face the truth of his own faith. His comments regarding the Christians and other faith traditions being "preserved" fails to share that those groups were preserved through a system of "tribute" they were required to pay for their "preservation". The tribute was nothing more than a system of bribery and extortion like the "insurance" payments collected by the Mafia in some of America' largest cities. Rather than acknowledging what was put in front of him, he chose to recite the historical failings of other groups to divert attention from his own faith because he simply cannot stand the truth.
You got to be kidding
He literally condemned many Muslims country’s and also brought up other Muslim country’s that were actually good and respected other religions. Watch the video
@@uhhcoolstory5627 Mahomet did not respect other religions. Islam holds in contempt and provides no respect for other religions. Surah 9: 29 is a testament to that.
@@lifemaverick6427 if that was true, then the Jews would have never had their Golden age within Iberian Chaliphate. Educate your sorry self. Christianity and Judaism are considered people of the book, special status.
@@LARESCIV Educate yourself, Mahomet never respected other religions - he strategically 'tolerated' them until he could find a way to subjugate, enslave, compel or tax them.
You're saying when Mahomet destroyed over 300 idols with a stick that he was respecting the polytheists? According to Ibn Ishaq, Mahomet reviled other people's religion and insulted their gods - thus the reason why he was thrown out of Mecca.
Now, "my sharia is obeying the American Constitution" is an unexpected surprising concept to me because Linda Sarsower publicly yell at US that "Muslims are not here to submit to any constitution..." or something of the like.
Also, US constitution is based on Judeo-Christian values, so it’s quite conflicting when he said that.
Learn the difference between submitting and his perspective in saying obeying
@@malar4722if it’s based on it then what in the constitution goes against other religions? It’s called separation of religion and state
@@malar4722 There are many things that are similar between Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Contrary to the popular belief Islam and Judaism have more common than Judaism and Christianity.
He's lying, COTUS does not compel action. Period. #StayFree
Dennis, as a Western woman, I respectfully disagree that a woman in a mini-skirt is less outrageous than a woman in a veil. They are part and parcel of the same thing. Women receive messages from a very young age to expose themselves. You see preschool girls twerking. The entertainment industry continues to objectify women and create pressure for women to use their bodies to get attention as sex objects. Mr. Al-Marayati is spot on with this issue.
A Survey in 2019 showed %67 of veiled women are forced to wear the Hijab/ Burka
@@tboss6689 1. Where was the test done
2. Don’t blame religion, blame corruption.
3. It isn’t apart of Islam to force women to wear a veil
@@uhhcoolstory5627 Actually it is because momo demanded women cover themselves. You should try reading the sunnah/sira smh
@@stephanies1474 actually all the Abe religions require people cover up.
@@Gebri3l Define cover up.
look at mohammed he is their example.....it is that simple...
@@hsdjsdshdhsdnsmsd6247 there is also Hadiths. The companions of the prophet Muhammad saaws would record what he said and did and taught.
“You can prove murder in the name of Christianity is unChristian and get Christians to change because Jesus did not murder. You cannot prove murder in the name of Islam is unIslamic and get Muslims to change because Muhammad murdered his enemies and detractors.” -Kevin Everett FitzMaurice
Did he murder every single man in makkah and taif who oppossed in when he took the city. Now, he spared them even though they were his worst enemies. They killed his daughter and uncle and yet he spared them and showed mercy to them. He only had those killed who were deemed a very major threat and might have destroyed him if he did not act. Every government in the world does that.
So you "quote" is just a pile of dogshit and im pretty sure you liked it yourself
Learn why the battles happened… Christianity doesn’t allow you to kill people who attack you or attack in the name of the religion. Islam can let you kill someone if they are trying to kill you
@@_im_stupid_ literally
@@uhhcoolstory5627 So that's why that muslim beheaded an old lady as she exited the church in Nice in October 2020? Without counting the three other dead?
Argument gets down to that famous political philosophers statement. " it depends on what the meaning of is is."
They should have Brigitte Gabriel or any ex Muslim- the Apostate Prophet, Nonie Darwish, Waffa Sultan, Ayan Hirsi Ali- to tell the truth about islam and sharia. This man picks the non violent parts of their book. But there is the military part, of conquest and submission of infidels...which they follow today.
If "Political Islam, political Judaism, political Christianity committed their own atrocities," then that's consistent with Psalms 53:3 "Every one of them is gone back: they are altogether become filthy; there is none that doeth good, no, not one".and Romans 3:10 "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:" Therefore, John 14:6 is absolutely true: "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: *NO MAN* cometh unto the Father, but by me."
When it comes to the hijab, the veil, and for that matter, the burqa, it is irrelevant which people of the world started it. There have been veils worn by women for thousands of years. These things are borrowed and become a tradition in certain religions. Symbolic fasting does not originate in Islam but it has become a part of Islamic culture in Ramadan.
so you are ok with Islam dehumanizing women with the garbage bag over their face?
+BaWare Yneb Let me see if I understand you: because I state that certain practices did not begin in the locations where they have found an established place, that means I am good with those practices? Do you know that burning at the stake was done as far back as Ancient Egypt. Contrary to what you might think, I am not in favor of burning people at the stake. You need to reread what I said. I think it was in response to someone claiming that Islam was not completely responsible for some dire religious practice based on the notion that the practice originated elsewhere.
@@WhtetstoneFlunky what you should focus on is regardless of where traditions started or not is what they do now , wearing the hijabs is MANDATORY that is what's the issue , no other religion acts like Islam today , most non Muslims societies do not place religion on the same pedestal as Islam does , in Islamic countries it's almost impossible to be a non religious person , in fact in most Islamic countries it's becoming more and more repressive , the fact is whatever customs were started they hold no sway whatsoever today in non Muslim countries but in Muslim countries these traditions or requirements are very much alive and becoming more and more hard line Indonesia and Turkey been two examples where coercion regarding these traditions are been imposed
When "culture" becomes a compulsory and repressive religious practice, it transforms a religion into a CULT. Islam - is a cult, and this is why it is so difficult to get out of it. Peace.
Wemen traditionally weren't beaten for not wearing a veil as it was traditional and not mandatory.
How many Christians live safely in Muslim coutries?
Dennis, can you translate some of your stuff to Hebrew please?
For Israelis and others.
What strike me the most is the immense of non-specificity of certain claims against Islam. However, it seems this talk is productive and that is good.
Mr. Muslim here is practicing taqiyyah to the fullest for the Western audience.
You dont even know what Taqiya is. Its only permitted under threat of life. Educate yourself
Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse." (1 Peter 2:18). This verse here condones slavery and is mentioned in the New Testament. Here is another verse from the Old testament:And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord.
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." This here allows sex slaves of pre pubescents, advocates for killing of both women and children. This is all from the King James version of the Bible. Beautiful text!
One google search would solve your ignorance 😂
The attempt to create moral equivalence between Israelis and Hamas is stretching things a bit. What does this Salam think of October 7. Is Hamas morally equivalent to the IDF? Is Hamas just nationalism or secularism? I would guess it is not.
Halakha is the same as Sharia, Islam and the Quran is the complete, social, political, economical, and military way of life.
I would transplant Expansion of Democracy for Colonization. Thinking that everyone wants democracy, which in itself is a dogma and a lie! Good points from both individuals!
Without truth than everything is relative and permissible!
I suppose that the 50 Muslim countries were mainly converted by missionaries carrying hand puppets in their rucksack alongside with the scriptures. They got the idea from their holy books. It reminds me of Tom Lehrer and his song The Folksong Army. They all just converted people by preaching and entertaining converts. And there are minority religions in their countries like the Coptic Christians in Egypt. The slaves survived in many Christian states, but no one praises these countries for this accomplishment.
Thank you
Each time, I hear about sharia
its always made sound its cool
Its not true
With the Bible, you have to invent stuff to make it sound violent and misogynist. With the Quran, you have to invent stuff to make it sound NON violent.
Violence, supremacy, death, all those things are an inherent part of their scripture and it can't be separated from the actions of Muslims. Just the fact that you can't leave Islam without being threatened with death pretty well says it all. Even the most luxurious prison is still a prison.
So true!
The Muslim man makes some good points. But he is not using statistics but rather individual examples to create the impression of moral equivalence. Bill Warner uses statistics on Islam to characterize the religion in overall terms. And it is just as easy to argue for moral differences too. The current case of Oct 7 and the brutal attack on Israel and its civilians by Hamas tends to suggest moral differences are important. And perhaps we should see that the Nazis were not committing the Holocaust because of religious conviction, as they rejected Christianity. But the jihadis today quote their scriptures to just if their atrocities. In short the Muslim man is more an apologist than a scholar objectively summarizing the character of Islam as a movement in the world across time.
There is one way to God in Christianity which is through Jesus Christ. No other ways.
Amen
Mr Prager correctly identifies the obstacle within Islam that prevents reformation. He then opines that Islam can change and that, if it does it will be to through the efforts of American Muslims. Unfortunately Prager does not identify why Islam is entirely incapable of reformation. Here's why: Muhammad repeatedly insisted that he was NOT the author of the Qur'an. He declared that Allah was the Quran's author and that he had only taken dictation. That this was accomplished in a series of visits by the archangel Gabriel, who transmitted to Muhammad, Allah's words to be written down. In support of this claim, Muhammad declared that he was then and was now, illiterate and that Allah had miraculously enabled him to write down his words. Therein lies the immovable obstacle, fallible mankind is literally incapable of revising infallible Allah's words. So to revise the Qur'an implicitly requires that Muhammad's claim that Allah is the author of the Qur'an be rejected. In which case, Muhammad was either a liar or delusional. In either case, Islam's theological foundations utterly collapse.
Lots of Attacks on Hindu Community.
I think people here are very much uneducated on Hindu Dharma.
First of all you all need to understand Hindu History to understand What you call Hindu Nationalism and what we call Hindu Renaissance.
Second Islamic Civilization 😂 what a joke.
In fact I can prove that all the basics of Knowledge of maths, science and all fields has roots in India not in Arabia. Arabs got all of it from India and they credited it but when Westerners got this knowledge they didn't credit India.
At last the women during Q&A is saying about veil in Hindus.
I think that woman needs to learn about India's History that why it came in society. It was due to the Islamic invasions due to which women used to do Sati or Johar. And also Ghoonghat because there was always a threat of women being abducted as sex slave or get killed like in Taliban.
My man over here talking good bout his own nation's culture yet bashes other's and thinks Taliban is good represenatation of average normative Islam. Maybe less bathing in septic pits and more book reading would do you good ?
Sola Scriptura **IS** the answer, and so is eisegeses. We aren't generally advocates of by politicized Sharia, but we do argue with traditionalists all the time. We've got very modern attitudes but we're generally very socially Conservative as well as against the general notion of evil, which we must ban, and good, we must mandate. It's true that these things should be enacted on by a consular government, a form of government as effective and moral as democracy, and much more in line with modern Muslim thought (which is based on the idea of shura, but in a religiously neutral way).
I don't call myself a Muslim since Muslims have lots of requirements for who is and is not Muslim. I do, however consider God to be the only God, no matter the language or ritual, and Muhammad is His prophet.
There is nothing good that Islam ever brought to this world.
You have nothing to be proud of and you need a bit of humility.
You wouldn't be able to have this conversation anywhere in the Muslim world.
Respect is earned, not demanded.
women university
Muslims invented glasses, the elephant clock, the first real world map and made many achievements in medicine by people like Ibn Sina or Al-Zahrawi or in mathematics by al-Khwarizmi and others. Also Islam improved womens rights when it started.
@@hsdjsdshdhsdnsmsd6247 give some respect to the Jewish people then
We developed algebra, optics, and various areas of medicine and science. Go get educated.
Such ignorance 😂
Wait I thought you can't debate Religion?
A Muslim speaker pulls up the "racist" "it is a racist" meaning you are racist.
This goes to one of Dennis prager's favorite sayings
SIX HIRB
Well when the whole comment section is talking about Islam as a whole being hateful and millions of Americans also believing Muslims are hateful it’s not surprising to see him say that at all😂 we literally got people taking off women’s hijabs in SCHOOL and many merchants forcing women to take it off. Who’s going against who’s religion now
@@uhhcoolstory5627 You speak about people taking off women's hijabs - should I cite the countless laws which FORCE women to wear hijabs in some Muslim countries? Should I cite the countless examples of the persecution and criticism women around the World suffer for willingly removing their hijabs?
@@uhhcoolstory5627 If they want to live in the US, they need to respect US citizens and their customs. That principle is the same in every western cuontry where they come God knows why.
They may be coerced by society to wear the face veil in Saudi Arabia (some, not most), but they're not in non-Muslim societies. So I don't see what his problem is exactly when it comes to, say, American women who do so.
Iraq is the Babylon of old. Throughout all of recorded history civilized societies have had to fight off the barbarian hordes. Only now do we ask the heathen why he rages and offer ourselves up on a silver platter for the slaughter.
It's *Indian* numeral, not *Arabic* numeral
Denis has his own analysis of history. He is entitled to that. I urge people to go out there and travek around the world. Denis needs to go get a brain. And most definitely a heart
So what you will do to the Mecca part of the Quran rhat is very violent
1:31:12 only time I disagreed with D and only time a agreed with what a Muslim said about dresscode lol
Half of the people who are okay with women being semi naked in public are not okay with dudes being semi naked around kids and for a good reason but somehow they think it's different. Lol
We’re a country of freedom even of religion but we should never let a person or religion that any freedom away bast on there belief
He is not following the original teachings of islam. He's chosen to create his own belief as he cant comply and cant believe/accept in the values of old teachings. He will be answerable to those who uphold the quoran.
I just wish the people that sit down to talk or ask about Islam at least read a decent translation of the quran, instead of mixing things and passing them for verses. And if they are going to comment on Muslim history then at least, for God's sake, read from trusted sources, and bring your sources for the claims you make.
About apostasy (because I didn't see Salam addressing this point), NO-WHERE in the quran there's talk about punishment for apostasy. The source for the Muslims (not all of us) that say that the punishment for apostasy is death comes from a narration (NOT a verse from the quran) about a person that basically committed treason (which btw in the US is punishable by death) and used religion simply to gather intel and then left Islam to share the gathered intel with the pagans in order to fight and exterminate the Muslims. That's the context in which that punishment was prescribed.
Are there Muslims nowadays that believe that, in theory, this is the punishment for anyone leaving Islam? Honestly yes. Do they believe in applying it nowadays? NO. Maximum, and I'm talking about the more extreme opinion, they would tell you to simply keep it to yourself and not to advertise it.
I dont know why I feel that Anjem chowdhury is much more honest than Salam Al Marayati
Good. Why don't you start following Anjem Choudary instead of prophet Muhammad saaws?
I naively expected to see an open debate about the issue of Islam and can it be reformed , sadly but predictably the Muslim guy said NOTHING absolutely NOTHING , only played the victim card and on occasions brought in the racists card to bolster his point of view , he spoke but said NOTHING that would lead to the any conclusion can Islam be reformed ,
When confronted about terrorism in Islam all he could do was point out faults in other communities religions, excused radicalision on colonialism , brushed the genocide of 100 million plus Hindus by Muslims as nothing, had the neck to compare The sharia with the American constitution , refused to discuss the countless terrorist attacks in the West by Muslims in the name of Islam, No other religion can compare with Islam on the terrorist attacks in the modern world.
Refused to discuss the horrendous conditions non Muslims face living in Muslim countries taking the Coptic Christians in Egypt, Yazidi in Syria and iraq , Christians and Hindus in Pakistan, Christians and Hindus in Indonesia , Christians in Nigeria, Niger Chad Algeria Morocco etc .
No he spoke exactly like a Muslim incapable of criticism or honest open debate just deceit and avoidance of honest open debate,
Finally congratulations to Dennis for his silence and ability to listen and respect the Islamic speaker as he spoke but said NOTHING.
“He spoke exactly like a Muslim” 😭 what? I wouldn’t be surprised if you were racist with that trait😂 just generalizing a whole religion when 3 million Muslims live in the USA. He condemned those countries you listed buddy. That was literally the first thing he said. He also already said how in one of the Muslim country’s in the past they said not to condemn Christians in there because of freedom of religion. He also condemned people who force women to wear the hijab 😳 it’s called blame the corruption not the religion
He even believes in separating church and state. The Muslim speaker is more American than you😂
GET DANIEL HAQIQATJOU UP THERE!
Any person religion that use violence to spread its faith and any people not tolerating other people's religion, should be condemned. Many members of Jewish, Christian and Islam are guilty of committing violence in the name of religion. Do not cherry pick facts. I am a Catholic, well Christian but I am aware of the sins committed by leaders of Catholic and Christian faith supposedly in the name of "God". I believe in God but the established religions are making me sick.
Al-Mayarati is a weasel. He will concede a little here and there, but it's clear he has something up his sleeve that he WILL NOT CONCEDE or even acknowledge, and that is that Islam is here to conquer. He is practicing the double talk of Taqiyya.
Taqiyah not “taqiyya” is when you can say you aren’t Muslim if you are threatened because of being one… Christianity doesn’t let you. Islam also lets you kill someone if they attack you because of it. If they submit then you can’t. “Islam is her to conquer” then why is it that you are supposed to respect other religions 😐 the first thing he talked about is how many Muslim country’s aren’t actually following it and should be condemned.
@@uhhcoolstory5627. There are variations in the spelling in English, including yours. My spelling of it is very common. On the other hand, Muslims ALSO practice Taqiyya TO ADVANCE THE AGENDA OF ISLAM. They are permitted to deceive the infidels ANY TIME, thus they use the tactic of deception not only to hide their adherence to Islam, but ALSO ANY ASPECT OF THE FAITH that might open the infidel's eyes as to Islam's intrinsic violence toward them and what the goals of Islam are ultimately about.
14:12 Men have rules on what they are allowed to wear and what not to show people. Your interpretation of it is just ignorance
23:00 Exactly, the comments are so hilarious. It’s like they aren’t watching the video at all
50:20 so far the Muslim speaker sounds more American than this whole comment section 😂 freedom of religion
1:00:00 not sure if even 80% of Americans know this
1:10:00 not one thing he said wasn’t peaceful. He’s more American than this whole comment section
1:20:00 nothing she said wasn’t true. It’s the whole point of Islam. Islam is a peaceful religion. Go against corrupted people not religion
Watched the whole video and I don’t understand how people can be against Islam before and after watching this. Every religion has a form of extremism and terrible interpretations and corruption. Very sad to see so many people against religions itself and group everyone into a box
Is there compulsion in Islam?: Yes (apostasy, etc)
Is there freedom of speech in Islam?: No (blasphemy laws, etc)
Is everyone equal under the law in Islam?: No (dhimmitude, jizya, etc)
Is there an open edict to wage war against non-Muslims: Yes. (jihad)
These are the reasons why people are against Islam - it has nothing to do with the behavior of individuals, it has to do with the core ideology of Islam.
I WISH the man on left would call Christian Prince...
Wow he's practicing hard core taqiyya.
taqiyyah, in Islam, the practice of concealing one's belief and foregoing ordinary religious duties when under threat of death or injury. Derived from the Arabic word waqa (“to shield oneself”), taqiyyah defies easy translation.
What part is he using 😂 he isn’t cause you don’t know what it is
@@uhhcoolstory5627 False....it's lying to further the cause.
@@uhhcoolstory5627 You are talking about kitman or muruna.
1:07:00 BLAHBLAHBLAHJIVETALKIN.
Dennis right way is not for us all become vegetarians in the distant future. Right way is to turn away from the SAD= standard American diet. Go back to the diet of our ancestors when we were hunter-gatherer Lots of vegetables and some meat Intermittent fasting as that's the way we ate as hunter-gatherers and that's healthy for your biology. In other words yes meat with much vegetables no processed foods except this an the occasional snack.
BUT I don't know how you started equating eating turning it into a religion. Yes some people turn feeding into a religion = Vegan diet, carnivore diet.
He sees common ground between Islam and secularism.
Dennis is right, it's utterly pointless to even talk to this guy.
Arab Supremacy is in full force.
@@tomlee2065 the beautiful thing thing about Islam is that Allah swt never chose the Arabs to be the Chosen people, or the Jews or any people because of their race. What is your racist views of Arabs?
There are secular muslim countries.
Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse." (1 Peter 2:18). This verse here condones slavery and is mentioned in the New Testament. Here is another verse from the Old testament:And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord.
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." This here allows sex slaves of pre pubescents, advocates for killing of both women and children. This is all from the King James version of the Bible. Can you explain these verses?
@@tomlee2065 how 😂😂 guaranteed you didn’t watch the video
There are too many Islamists here. I do not wish my grandchildren to live under sharia , I don't wish anyone to have to live under sharia, which is so cruel to young children and women.
How
Only ONE WAY,to the kingdom of God, to be born AGAIN by the Spirit. I'm thankful that the spirit of God who Jesus gives freeze us from all of this humanism and simply being a human who is trying to use some form of Dogma to please God. Anyone who wants to know about Islam needs to go back to the original story of Muhammad and they will learn that it was actually a cult priestess who wrote the scriptures that he used to gather his band of warriors and begin to dominate the Arabian peninsula. Islam doesn't have anything to do with pleasing God it has to do with dominating other people.
22:27 thats exactly because America is founded on Judea Christian values lol
Colossal waste of time. It will never happen.
Sabine Hammer yeah and Dennis is aware of that, matter of fact, he basically says it. However, people are watching this video... I watched the whole thing, I’m trying to understand (Agree?) with the man on the left (of the screen LOL) but most of what I hear coming out of him doesn’t answer the foundational questions asked of him. I don’t think he feels he’s lying, but I also think he is evading... So a “waste of time”... hmmmm yeah I don’t know, really!
@@Studio51media what question didn’t he answer 😂
It does need reformation if we bin-muslim wabt to survive to rhe next decade
No; it needs to be rendered nonexistent, as it's a huge crock of toxic-waste.
Does prof Salam have no concern for this life, his statement that we must get rid of Muslim governments was very surprising
I would be careful to buy into numerals being Arabic. Do some research, easy peasy.
What about Vodka?
This "Muslim" is in stark denial of his own Qur'an. Just read chapters 4, 5 and 9 to see how much he is in error.
Cathy S he has read way more than you have
Have you read the Bible lmao? Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse." (1 Peter 2:18). This verse here condones slavery and is mentioned in the New Testament. Here is another verse from the Old testament:And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord.
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." This here allows sex slaves of pre pubescents, advocates for killing of both women and children. This is all from the King James version of the Bible.
@@alikader909 Yes Al. I have read the bible too.
The difference is that I understand it because I understand logic, especially the several forms of context.
Your hatred is palpable.
I'm praying for you.
@@cathys465 your Logic is that read that Holy Book and you see verses you don't like, yet your own Book condones slavery, sex slaves, murder of children and women, and so on. Ok you can "pray for me" lmao. Don't be such a hypocrite.
@@cathys465 and you can say exactly the same thing with your interpretation of the chapters you gave 😂
Let’s start in Genesis , concerning covering for women . Did God cover Eve from head to foot ? After she realized she was naked, not at all .
Let’s examine Genesis , in order to learn every truth God lay down to Man . The best way to end all debate and speculation .
Taqyia, there are several jihads..this muslim is not telling the truth. Bring Robert Spencer, Raymond Ibrahim to discuss the truth about islam.
There are several types of Jihad though.
The most referred to one is warfare one and usually it is the one referred to the most when talking about Jihad.
I have no idea who raymond ibrahim is, bur I know robert spencer, he is an utter idiot, mixes truth with lies and is a conspiracy theorist, taqqiya is a thing mostly used by shia.
Taqqiya as for muslims "sunni" is hiding religion and pretending to not be muslim for safety reasons.
When you hear something against what you always hear about Islam from a Muslim the answer isn't always taqqiya it might actually be a lie for whatever reason as you claim it may be actually true and you're just fixated on some wrong delusion that this thing is like that in Islam while it isn't or it might be that the person you're talking to is a heretic and doesn't believe in certain aspects in Islam.
Like for example some people deny Sharia and that is apostasy from Islam but they still claim to be muslim and may tell you that Islam means peace and love and flowers and rainbows and doesn't have war, he lied about Islam but it's cause he's a heretic infidel and didn't lie cause he is hiding something from you he did cause he believed what he said.
First really see what is happening in India without your Muslim Eyes. Indian State in Itself is a Hinduphobic state.
See the treatment of Hindus and Muslims. There's no genocide of Muslims in India Instead Kashmiri Hindus are the ones facing Genocide.
Nobody in this whole universe can say that Hindus are the most intolerant.
We respect everyone good and expect reciprocity.
I love how Denis has issues with Muslim extremists and conflating it with Islam itself. I hope he does the same with extremist Jews and Judaism. I suspect he doesn't. Islam is not a religion. We say it is a way of life. Sharia Law is G-ds law. We as humans cannot speak on G-ds behalf. How about Israel and its actions? Will Denis critique Israel in that way.
Introductions are like nails on a chalkboard.
When Jesus Christ returns to take up the crown of David from Jerusalem the Arab world will acknowledge Him as the Messiah. Islam will collapse as the false religion it is. It is Catholicism that will stand up against the Christ. Already RC teach that the ‘One’ building the Temple in Jerusalem is the ‘Anti-Christ, it is they who will not recognise their Messiah. They know not their Bible (as they don’t read it) or, prophecy.
A
He is speaking total dribble
Obviously a great conversation. Deliberate/labored speech flow conveys to me: hesitation and loose grounding in the argument.
Don't murder.
Love your brother.
"Equity is G-d's value, COTUS is my Shari'a", NO, that's wrong.
#StayFree
#dontconvert2islam
Americans were in Afghanistan women were out free now women are band now that Americans are gone so how is there freedom
Pure taqiyya mr Marayati.
Or delusional wishful thinking.
Guy on the left is very disingenuous
The notion that Israel is defending itself is as absurd as the notion that a rapist is defending himself from the victim, because Israel is the occupier.
The middle east problem.....In a nutshell, it’s this: One side has been enduring displacement and occupation.
The Palestinians, descendants of the ancient Canaanites, aspire to live in their own homeland, free of occupation and with rights equal to any other nation. They recognize the Jewish history in the land but assert their own millennia-long connection to Palestine. The tragedy is that many, including some in Israel, do not recognize the rights of the Palestinians to self-determination in their own state.
This has been true since 1947 when the United Nations voted to divide the land called Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state. While it is often mentioned that Arabs rejected this plan, the complexities of why are seldom discussed. For the Palestinians, this plan was seen as partitioning a land where the majority were Arab, without their true consent.
In 1948, as Israel was established, approximately 700,000 Palestinians were displaced from their homes, creating a refugee crisis that persists to this day. Known as the Nakba or "catastrophe", it is a sorrowful event for Palestinians, marking loss and dispossession.
Years later, in 1967, Israel expanded its borders, occupying territories including the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem. These areas are considered by international law as occupied territories. Yet, settlements, considered illegal under international law, have continued to grow, taking more land from Palestinians.
When Palestinians resisted occupation, their uprisings were met with force. When they sought diplomacy, the path to statehood remained elusive. And when they tried to tell their story to the world, they often faced deaf ears.
For decades, Palestinians have seen their land shrink, their rights curtailed, and their call for justice muted. They have repeatedly asked for the end of the occupation, the right of return for refugees, and a capital in East Jerusalem.
Consider the reality of life in Gaza. The blockade has resulted in a humanitarian crisis, with limited access to basic necessities, medical supplies, and opportunities. Yet the spirit of the Palestinians remains unbroken, their culture vibrant, and their aspirations clear.
Think about these questions: If Palestinians were given their full rights and statehood tomorrow, would they still have grievances? And if Israel recognized the Palestinian right to a state and ended the occupation, what would happen?
In the first case, a long-standing injustice would be addressed. In the second, a significant step towards peace would be made.
Remember this: The land known as Palestine has been home to diverse civilizations and peoples for thousands of years, including the Canaanites from whom many Palestinians trace their lineage. Palestinians have a deep-rooted history in this land, and their aspiration for a state is a quest for justice and recognition.
That's the issue: Why can't the Palestinian people, with their rich history and contributions to civilization, have their own state and live with dignity and peace?
🤣😂
Denis reading of history is from a purely Jewish and western view. You can tell from his opinions and ignorance. What is the history of Christianity and also Judaism. Did not David and Moses fight wars. He cherry picks history's events to suit his ignorant and bigoted views of Islam and muslims. He is a complete and utter waste of time. He tries to connect with the audience by conflating Judaism and Christianity. Please Denis, these two religions are poles apart. First of all Jews do not believe in Christ in any way whatsoever Islam and the early Muslims largely fought defensive and existential wars. Those times there was no diplomacy. In the crusades when the Christians took over they literally would kill everyone. Spain is proof of how intolerant Christians were. And most recently Germany is proof of how Jews and minorities were dealt with. The tolerance of Christians especially in Europe only recently has improved. Otherwise, Denis needs to get his head checked. In the US, the natives have largely been exterminated along with their culture. The blacks only got equal rights 6 years ago. Please be objective Denis. Don't live in your Utopian world where only Muslims have committed violence. Peace unto all G-d fearing people
Blah, blah, blah, blah.