The Differences Between The M1 ABRAMS and The LECLERC MBT
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 เม.ย. 2019
- The Differences Between The M1 ABRAMS and The LECLERC MBT
► SIMILAR VIDEOS: • 20 Surprising Facts Ab...
► The Differences Between M1 ABRAMS and LEOPARD 2 Battle Tanks: • The Differences Betwee...
► The Differences Between the STRIDSVAGN 122 and the LEOPARD 2A5 Battle Tanks: • The Differences Betwee...
Try out Grammarly.com today: bit.ly/2pQOtZq
• SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/SubscribeFtdFacts
• SUPPORT US! Become A Channel Member: / @ftdfacts
The M1 Abrams is a third-generation American main battle tank named after General Creighton Abrams and designed by Chrysler Defense. The Leclerc tank is a main battle tank built by GIAT, now Nexter of France. It was named in honour of General Philippe Leclerc de Hauteclocque, who led the French element of the drive towards Paris while in command of the Free French 2nd Armoured Division in WWII.
FOLLOW US:
Leroy Kenton: / ftdonline
Dave Walpole: / dave.r.walpole
Facebook: / ftdonline
Twitter: / ftdonline
#BattleTank #M1Abrams #Military
France always start a design with some European allies then quit the project because the others didn’t believe in the French vision. Each time France ends crafting alone its own version. Each time France creates an unmatchable masterpiece. It happened with the Rafale, it happened with the Leclerc.
FRANCE IS THE VERY BEST TO REMAIN INDEPENDANT WITH ITS KNOW HOW AND VISION IN THE MILITARY EXPERIENCE AND FOR EUROPE MILITARY... CONGRATS FRANCE YOU ARE A GREAT NATION REALLY...
@@egran2150 well it's a shame we chose to adopt a german design as our new battle rifle. The french-made Famas seved us well.
@@nootnoot6404 ils se fait vieux et hk c'est quand même une marque très fiable.
@@TemplarBlack. Vieux ne veut pas dire obsolete, les M16 sont vieux mais efficaces, les AK aussi mais une mise à jour aurait pu être effectuée par la manufacture de Saint Etienne
Europe needs more France than France needs Europe
Leclerc tank just won the NATO tank competition IRON SPEAR in Latvia 💪
Nice
My contry won ! 🙃😜
Lettonia is another name for Latvia, yes?
@@bkup1332 No, it is a neighbour other little nation (Latvia, Lettonia and Estonia )
@@felix25ize -- Is Lettonia another name for Lithuania?
The Leclerc was also the first tank in the world to have virtual battlefield for tank commanders with data fusion from the other Leclercs around, and data transmission to command posts. Arguably more of a change than Chobham.
The Leclerc also has a better FCS than the abrams ( in a competition, it got 20/20 vs 19/20 for Leo2 and 17/20 for the Abrams). The series XXI also dropped the titanium armor modules for depleted uranium armor modules.
The Leclerc can use 2 more fuel tanks at the rear, adding around 200 more kilometers of range.
Le Leclerc est très nettement supérieur 👍
Sa fait plaisir d'entendre une personne qui dit une vérité qui devrait être général. Merci à toi.
Vive la France
Les anglo-saxons sont toujours là pour rabaisser la France mais ont garde la tête haute
@@dezia9957 exact, g eu beaucoup de dispute à cause d'eux. J'appelle ça de la naïveté anglaise. C'est tellement dommage que c'est anglo saxon gâche tout pendant que d'autres personnes s'unissent et disent leur propre avis sans rabaisser . Merci pour ton commentaire très intéressant. Un vérité triste. Quoiqu'il en soit. Nous faisons partie de la même team. C'est ça qui me rend le plus fier d'être français. Merci
Lolllll
oui, mais il n'est jamais allé au feu contrairement au abrams qui a prouvé sa valeur sur de nombreux théatres d'opérations.
Leclerc the best Tank 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷
YaaaaaayiAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
I absolutley love the Leclerc tank! My favorite tank so far!
This video is riddled with incorrect information
Example: "When armor piercing ammo was introduced" oh, you mean in the early 1870s?
Yes which honestly is to be expected from this Channel
Lmao shows T-72 instead of a Patton
Leclerc was made to shoot while mooving. It had 90% precision of hit on a target mooving at 50km/h while being himself at 50km/h. Thats why it's far better than abrams and it's was of the best tank in the world. Even isaelians said that 1 leclerc could destroyed 4 merkava before being hit....
Now, only the leopard version 2A7 have similar capacity but still slower (russian t 14 we dont know)
90% precision while both moving at 50 km/h? where is your source, it seem more like a fantasy than real life.
From what i read/heard but not reliable, in Greece, on the firing on the move test, best results were: the Abrams got 17 targets out of 20, the Leo 2 19/20, the Leclerc 20/20.
Could theorically engage an aircraft with its main gun but currently doesn't have adapted fused ammo for it, and boasting capability to hit a target going at 70kph, while going at 50kph in another direction, 95% of the time, at 5 km.
What i can completely reliably add, though, and which doesn't make the previous elements looking like "fantasy" is that the leclerc just won first place in the NATO "Iron spear" tank firing competition this october in Latvia.
@@canicheenrage French army got fused ammo for it ;) We just don't use them in training cause they are "war ammo" only
@@alex-ragnarson3482 Really ? Interesting. What's the name of the shell ?
@@canicheenrage it's the HE M3M, if I remember correctly.
*Abrams vs Leo 2 video gets massive dislike ratio: "You guys really like these videos!"
Good joke XD
theScottishKoala too right mate
Since De Gaulle, France has been willing to spend money to stay independent. They have their own atomic weapons, and that’s a smart move. Just ask Ukraine,.
That makes France one of the only 4 countries to be 100% independent to maintain their army, with the US, Russia and China.
@@vizender China just makes shitty copies of US and Russian stuff so they don't really count
@@vizender And that my friend is sadly wrong. our army is far from being independent, take for example the replacement of the FAMAS for the HK416 in 2016, we do not manufacture them, we order them from Germany, same goes with ammo, France shut down all ammo productions and now orders from other countries since ages.
Considering the example i took is the main AR for the French army, that's quite a blow to the "100% independant".
And there is a lot, lot lot more that we order, as a matter of fact, we rely too much on ordering, instead of producing, which is a strong flaw for the French Army, because in case of a nation wide conflict, we're screwed hard.
@MrTherealpad France doesn't manufacture weapons anymore, aside from some hunting rifles (double barrels 12g), we don't produce any rifles meant for the army, any rifles at all anyways.
And the rifles are a thing, it doesnt change we are 100% dependant from other nations when it comes to ammos, so it's nice to have X amount of rifles, but if you got no ammos for it, they're worthless.
Someone stole Abrams footage form PhlyDaily.
You tell him young Stalin. Terrible vid.
I love Leclerc! I hope that France makes an even mightier tank!
its not 'le-clerc' its pronounced 'le-claire'
TheCloop123 Thank you. His pronunciation is driving me nuts
Merci
he is amairiquin that's why =) or a murican xD
Correct !
Le-clerc is how the French say it
And when talking about the M60, I'm pretty sure you showed a T-72... A Soviet tank.
Plus, it's not just a case of changing "barrels" it's a case of changing the entire main gun...
Something important to notice, the future mbt will have improved gun with probably 130mm or 140mm canon (France and US already used this kind of gun on mbt chassis), the shell will weigh under 50 to 60 kg (110-130 pounds). Therefore a autoloading system will probably be needed and France are familiar with this king of thing.
Yes They are trying this type of Canon and for the moment performances are really exceptionnal ! 70 % better for the 140 mm
You're right about the caliber but the weight of the projectiles...50 kg that's the weight of a WW2/early ColdWar APHE or HE of caliber 150mm even up to 203mm, today APFSDS shell weights about 4 to 5kg max, increasing to 130 or 140 would put it at around 10Kg
The Russian T14 already has the most powerful cannon yet. I think its 125 mm or something
@@vozhdenko932 caliber and penetrating power aren't to be confused, yet you're right but not for the right reason. The T-14 has a new kind of auto loading system and coupled with the unmanned turret it is able to load more than 1meter long APFSDS shells that according to some source 900 to 1000mm of penetration at 1km range, which would make it able to pierce any modern
tank.
@@lepatriote9498 you're forgetting the shell is made out of metal alloy which is both heavier and denser than steel, so a 140mm subcaliber shell made from a mix of Tungsten and Depleted uranium is really heavy
3:00 m60 "patton" also known as t72
*leaves video*
Was looking for this comment
Not even mentioning that Leclerc have longer cannon... very important and that's why Leo2 since A6 also have cannon
also the 140mm which was developed but hasn't been used yet
The lack of research from the makers of this video is really sad... The m60 was quite something.
And with the newest and recent upgrades the M60 is back into the battle, again.
@@OMP25 just saw one in iran shooting ufos with its 140mm satellite lock laser beam
I prefer the French tank, it seems much more efficient!
I think it's 98% of accuracy for the leclerc and not 90%
It's 90% when driving at 40/50km/h
@@EmirMoquette Yep 50km/h not less for sure, cuz he is one of the only tank in the world that can hit a target at 4km while he is driving
@@thelemega9476 don't exagerate, the stats are done for 1,5 to 3km (for a former french NCO, tank leader on AMX30B/B2 but having served alongside Leclerc and have followed instruction on Leclerc in EAABC Saumur)... En revanche, oui, c'est le seul qui a un super ratio de tir en mouvement. Le Leo 2A7 est deuxième mais comme ils ont mis 20 ans pour chercher le même système, on garde l'avantage du départ, car en 20 ans, il a évolué.
Try to reach that reload rate with a human loader in combats situations... especially when running at high speed...
try re-loading when a part breaks on your auto-loader ..while running at high speeds.
@@morgangrey4020
The French tank unlike the American tank does not fall into pieces because it is madin France and the Americans have always had the reputation of having shabby material ex: the Sherman tank, M3 lee, M10 ...
Lunixot thats why france needed americans in shabby shermans to free their country back in the day i guess
@@matthiasb5970 France paid the bill cash, when de Gaulle said "get out now !"
@@matthiasb5970 france with no tank rnd and production under germans and with latest designs being desings of early to mid 30s would obviously need Americas industrial powerhouse help including shermans.
"Replacement for the *M60 Patton*"
*shows a Soviet T-72 mbt*
There was a Leclerc varient with a 150mm gun !
It was called Terminateur
the giat cn120-26 is way better
140mm electrochemical. the prototype was called Le Terminateur and was shown in 2017 IIRC. It was a prospect for upgunning the tank like US did with the M1
@@bloubiboulga6774 pas vraiment, le 140 était un monstre de puissance offrant plus 25% de performances sur le 120 et une portée pratique rallongée d'une borne. A 5km on avait un effet similaire à celui d'une frappe au 120 à 4. Le hic c'était les munitions, plus massives, elles demandaient un redesign en profondeur de la tourelle et du châssis pour que le char ne perde pas ses capacités exceptionnelles de tir en mouvement.
I think that the capacity to shoot at 50 kmh on a target at 3km makes it a clear winner. Mobility for modern MBTs is the differentiator. And the Abrahams weights is probably a big issue on its side.
Considering a Bradley 25mm can pen a leclerc from the front it shows that those mobility test don't works
@@lilMungowhere did you see that ? one of the designer of the Leclerc talk about the protection in the 90’, he says that in a frontal arc of 30 degrees, the Leclerc is immune against all types of apfsds and heat available on the market.
Are you 100% sure it introduced CHOBAM armor? You sure the British MBT 80 didn't introduce CHOBAM armor, since the British did create CHOBAM armor?
You mean the CHOBHAM armour developed by the CHOBHAM tank research centre at CHOBHAM common in CHOBHAM, UK
It’ was be first tank in service with chobam
Chobham armour was developed in the uk at chobham uk 🇬🇧 the British invented the armour not the Americans
Seriously there isn’t not much research spur into this video
lloyd9710
He never said it was made in the US. only that the tank uses it, which is true.
Thanks to the UK we have that armor the difference it makes. Aswell we've added DU layers of armor. Which means it'll be a tough nut to crack. The leclerc tank doesnt have the type of armor the UK made. It has different armor which is made by france.
@@cookiemonsterxlxlx and better =)
@@Savonsale which is better?
@@cookiemonsterxlxlx made in france so it is better =)
sorry if it make you upset but the true sometime hurt =)
Do difference between Sunny Leone and Mia Khalifa..
Lol
and then throw it away because no one really cares...
Leclerc is cooler. And autoloader is better. And most importantly, it has never been destroyed in combat.
It's barely seen any combat.
@@bkup1332 that's a good point. But that also applies to the f22 raptor. A jet that has never seen combat. And the zumwalt destroyers. And ford class carriers.
@@RR-us2kp - Granted, but we weren't talking about them in this thread. :-)
@@bkup1332 no we weren't. But you can't deny the logic. You can't criticize this when there are plenty of other weapon systems in the world which are way overhyped but never been combat proven.
Or do you believe the f22 to be a "paper tiger" that has just had too much exposure to Hollywood than actual combat?
@@RR-us2kp -- "Leclerc is cooler. And autoloader is better. And most importantly, it has never been destroyed in combat."
Yes, we're discussing the LeClerc in this thread.
I made no arguments for or against any other systems.
LeClerc saw some action in Kosovo, mostly movement, not receiving a lot of fire, as I recall.
The UAE has used it in combat some, not a lot.
So, I stand by what I wrote, that the LeClerc has not seen a lot of combat. Therefore, we're still trying to figure out its pros and cons.
I saw the leceric here in the UAE and it was amazing
LMFAO! Your picture of a Patton was a Finnish T-72
"Does France have a better tank?" YES! 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵
@@revolutionariesoffreedom No.
@@revolutionariesoffreedom to be frank, you’re delusional if you think the Abrams can compete nowadays, it’s very outdated now
Leclerc is better in and max speed is 90km (is Leclerc tank commander say this to me )
No it's 80 km/h on road and 50/60 km/h on all field
@@EmirMoquetteno it's 150 kmh with good wether
@@EmirMoquette is 70kmh on all terrain
@@EmirMoquette no it's 5400 kmh in space, launched by a rocket
@@EmirMoquette if you go to 90km/H with a leclerc its engine will simply die, that's called material resistance where the engine heat and fold in places
"what made the abrams a very unique tank was the Chobham armour" I think you might be forgetting the country that invented the armour and implemented it on its own tank(Chally 1)
Leclerc has a longer gun. Height is measure to the top of commanders sight, not the tower roof and leclerc is overall lower.
abram range you mentioned is wrong please correct it. Original range is 416 km where Lecrec is 544 km don't push US into superiority.
It uses gas turbine very bad for low speed battlefield not need speed only slower speed improve accuracy
Thats the american mentality "we are the best, we have save the world"
@@dezia9957 Remember this philosophist's sentence "We're all living in Amerika, Amerika. It's wunderbar"
Okay i'm joking it's true and false at the same time, as my own country (France) did the exact same thing back in the days, before the british took our place, until WWI and the rise of the US. If any country was at the same place as the US, this country would try to "bring liberty" everywhere. Oh hello China :O
Also if you stay too close behind an Abrams, you die because it’s exhaust pipe is heating like hell
I’ll take the French chocolate éclaire every day of the week, please and tank you. France makes excellent kit, but ask any soldier, whichever tank turns up that’s on your side is the best tank.
il vaut mieux etre dans un leclerc q'un autre tank seuls les professionels peuvent donner leur avis le reste ;;;; c'est de la game war
éclair*
The german-french tank development program was cancelled due to the very specific requirments for the leclerc, wich wasn't really standard and not good for an export tank.
Toin Toin Correct. It’s the difference between the needs of the French Army, which is, y’ know, actually a war fighting force of considerable merit versus those of the German... Boy Scouts. But the Leopard 2A4 (and better) is still an excellent tank - some say the best in class, but I think the Leclerc says otherwise - and, to be perfectly honest, and NATO (and other Allied) tank is an exceptional piece of kit that would almost all overmatch their Russian and Chinese equivalents.
Look dude we all recognize game footage when we see it . Everyone doesn't deserve a TH-cam video. 🤣🤣🤣
The thing I like in this video is the fact that you are pretty neutral, it's not like you are saying "yeah x tank is way better than the other" so yeah, great job !
Dans tout char, il y a l'aspect technique mais surtout l'utilisation tactique sur le terrain. On peut avoir d'excellents chars mais une tactique sur le terrain qui annihile les qualités techniques du char ! Un exemple récent est le conflit au Yemen qui a détruit au moins 20 chars Abrahams.
It is clear that the abrams is an old tank now outdated
The first M1 to receive depleted uranium was the IPM1 not the M1A1. This type of armor was added as an additional layer on top of the existing armor on the turret cheeks. They also made a AA prototype version called M1 AGS
Don't forget the 140mm canon for the Leclerc terminateur version 😊
Jihadist, planting mines to prepare for ambush.
*Leclerc tank spotted the mines:
Leclerc: HEY! YOU!!!
Man do your research a bit. UK invented Chobham armor, and it is not steel but steel/ceramic composite. Most of this videos you make are just riddled with wrong information.... not worth watching :/
Second video I'm watching from this channel and I'm not impressed with the research either.
@@abrahkadabra9501 I watched a few, pointless, too much mistakes and wrong info
I feel like this guy’s been getting info from wikipedia, most info he used is there
your pronounciation of Leclerc is almost good, just for you to know you don't need to pronounce the C and to pronounce the end well you basically just need to pronounce it as "air" in english and make the last R sounds as much french you can do, then it should be perfect
if it's appear too dificult just don't pronounce the last C :)
@ftd FACTS btw the French tank is pronounced Leclerc ("Lecler" no K sound). ;) Nice video!
the Leclerc rates higher than all the other western tanks because it's a more modern design. the m1, leo2, chall2 all come from desings made in the 70ies. Leclerc was perfected in the 90ies. Also, the auto loader makes it superior, whatever anti-auto-loader whiners have to say. Imo the leclerc compares more with the south korean and japanese designs, which largely surpassed western ones.
and the autoloader is not his most important thing. The leclerc has the best system of firing, can fire running at 40 km/h with the SAME efficiency than if he was fixed on the ground. None of his opponent can actually have the same ratio (96% of targets hit), they are even far from it. The alone to have truly modernised its firing system in thee same way of research is the Leopard 2A7, but german system arrives 20 years after french made it operational (after 10 years of research also)... you don't do the gap of 20 years in few months. especially that the Leclerc has already known 2 operational theaters (Kosovo + Yemen).
That's why the K2 lost to Leo2A7V in the Norwegian evaluation right? And why Leclerc lost in the Greek and Swedish evaluations as well.
Deux bêtes de combat particulièrement létales.
i prefer the leclerc but btw 🇫🇷🤝🇺🇸
When you mentioned the patton, you showed a picture of a t-72. (Chuckles) Why?
Angry americans disliking the video because someone DARED to compare an american vehicule with any other country counterpart and suggested it was equal / better is really pathetic
Scorpions program is not a camo type... Its a new communication system
It's wayyyyyyy larger than a simple communication system, it's the modernisation of the vehicles of French Army
@@black_eagle_7559 it's a new program made to improve vehicles synergy by the mean of communication. Two new vehicles like the griffon and the jaguar are far more modern but they are also made for combat with more communication
@@black_eagle_7559 c'est surtout de la merde pour le VBCI on ne retiens pas les erreurs du Leclerc au yemen donc ça pue
If you are going to show content from another creators channel, you should have asked for permission to use said content from the creators, in the case of 4:53 you used content from a creator called "PhlyDaily" with no credit at all in the description.
FTD Facts, Sir, you should first ask permission from Phlydaily to use this clip in your video.
Very good video and i got to say as a french it was very hard not being triggered by you pronouncing the last C in leclerc which is mute in this word but you are all forgiven
Current generation of depleted uranium is 2.43 times as strong as conventional tank armor, it's not only very dense but very hard combining attributes of both steel and lead making something stronger than tungsten. But Steel's come a long way since Depleted Uranium was added to the Abrams and I'd be interested to see how well more modern steels stack up, with AR500 being more than twice as strong as steel tank armor used in the 1940s for example but that's just AR500 steel- it goes up to AR700 right now... which is also harder than pure tungsten and lighter although be it still fairly heavy.
Edit; Fixed a typo. derp.
Proud to be french
the Chieftain 800
was the first tank to introduce chobham after taking over from the stillbrew installed on the Cheiftain Mk10 and 11
It was a conceptual design. Never put into service. Stillbrew remained until the tank's retirement.
what if the lecrec joins paris traffic to deal with yellow vests?
100 tanks like this in 1940 in france and the game was over
I doubt it. France already had superior tanks than Germany in 1940 with the Char B1. The problem was the massive mess, lack of radio orders because fearing to be heard, worse fleet, and thinking Germany could never go through the craggy Ardennes. Then they had weaker demographics.
No crappy opinion, just facts. And use of metric system. I got your like!
Correction : the Flackpanzer Leclerc is a photo montage done by GIAT as demonstration, the project was canceled shortly after the studies started
Australia uses recovery vehicles with the chassis I believe. (Export out of US only I think)
I love the Abrams but will always have a soft spot for the Merkava
Intresting
“Rate of fire doesn’t matter in tanks” when the soviet or Russian tank hoards come... tell that to the tank crewmen, fool!
"The Soviet tank horde" is a myth. No such a thing was a part of any Soviet doctrine.
JAnx01 I agree Hoards are a myth and is an exaggeration, but the Guards Tank Divisions, Motor Rifle Divisions and Shock Armies were real.
I think you’ll find that when a gap is exposed in NATO lines it would be packed with Soviet Tanks and IFV’s.
Trust me, I wouldn’t want to be in a Challenger 1 against 30 T-80BV’s or T-80U’s heading straight toward me...
@@tankdriver65861 the french, germans and uk tanks are made to destroy an entire regiment of russian tanks with one section. Less tanks but big firepower
YELLOW P0WER and how many sabot rounds do you think hit the target, then how many of those that hit penetrate?
I’d say out of 14 APFSDS rounds ready on a Chall, 7 will kill t-72, even less for a t-90. And that’s being optimistic...
@@tankdriver65861 european tanks are agile and powerful dont worry about our security if russian tanks fight a chall or another. If they are less they can win like david vs goliath with 14 sabot there are a lot of solutions
can you do a video of the al khalid tank
Btw abrams got a proposal of SPAAG Version known as "Liberty" with twin 25 mm cannons and 12 ATGM/ SAM missiles. It never came to prototype stage sadly.
USA : classified as "good old" USA
France : Just France.
Hey, u got me there buddy, with ur 200 year country xD
When you said replacement for the Good ol M60 tank, you showed an a t 62 or some kind of Russian tank.
Lecler is the best tank on the word
Idk why but in the notifications thumbnail Im pretty sure the abrams was a leo 2a5+
the armor of the leclerc is:
Composite armor
Series XXI: Reinforced with titanium. The modules covering the flanks of the rear of the turret include a semi-reactive layer
"A replacement for the good old M60 patton" shows a russian T-series or some shit. You fuckin what? 3:02
The M1 Abrams is named after the legendary American tank commander and war hero from World War 2, General Creighton Abrams
the Leclerc tank takes its name from Maréchal Leclerc, French hero of free France during the second world war :
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Leclerc_de_Hauteclocque
Thats better than Sherman. You should name your tank with the only true commanders in US history: Lee, Jackson, Forrest, Hood. All Confederates :D
@@fabizio Seems like those guys lost a war or something
@@fabizio british used Hood for a battlecruiser
Leclerc is the Rafale of MBTs'
The m1a1 did not take the gun from the leopard, it was a similar design of gun but made to fit inside the M1. Similar not same
Licensed copy actually
Neru Neru redesigned recoil mechanism
What game are you playing in those Le Clerc gameplay vids.
Wargame red dragon
Haha noob forget that game we don't need imbecil cancers like u who don't even know how to switch ammo types
Leclerc is the best tank in the world
Le Leclerc est le meilleur char au monde vive la France🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇨🇵🇫🇷🇫🇷
@Victor Lungu n'importe quoi les chars actuels sont des char d'appui le Leclerc a était cré pour contrer les russes 1 Leclerc peut résister à 3 Char russes le léopard est bon mais le armata c'est de la grosse merde va parler avec des militaires tu verras
@Victor Lungu va parler au colonel du 501 rcc tu vera
I also love how you try your best to make us believe the Abrams is actually better than the Leclerc in every step lol "A very good loader can load 15 rounds per minute, which is 2 more than the Leclerc, hey" Sure sure buddy
4seconds reload is pretty much impossible. The only tank i know that fast is the type 90
Leclerc it is 6rounds/min with autoloader... With AMX 30B, we did 6 in 54", but we were 3 private NCO (sergents d'active) in the turret (I was the "tireur", the chief was an old sergent of my company very experimented and the loader was a sergent transmetteur which had never been in the turret, nothing less normal : he was 1,85 and 100 kg, we did 3 attempts before that stat also, to be honest)... and the ammunition of 105 is way lighter than 120 mm... the commentator with his 12 then 15 rounds/min, made me laughed alot... 15 rounds a minute, that means that the tank fires every 4 seconds ! even fixed on the "pas de tir"... it's harsh to fire efficiently every 10 seconds. Leclerc can do it but it's harsh. then 12 and 15 MDR
Je pense qu'avec l'AMX 30B2, on aurait pu fairelégèrement mieux que 54" car dans le B, c'est le chef de char qui "ralentit" le tir, puisqu'il devait faire du télémétrage manuel à co-incidence d'image (d'où les deux "oreilles" sur la tourelle du B et pas du B2)... le B2 a un télémètre laser, donc en un dixième de seconde, on a la distance.
They can. But Leclerc is more reliable in the sense that human loaders get tired. On the other hand, an extra crew member is an extra pair of hands. A tank is a machine, and machines need maintenance. You are also not generally firing 24/7.
You could also have said that the Leclerc is capable at showing precisely at 60kph
Arrêtez d'exagérer les gars... oui, il tire super bien en roulant mais 60... faut jamais être monté dans un char pour dire cela. Un char lourd en tout terrain, c'est 50 sur terrain plat et c'est plus 30 à 40 quand c'est vallonné... à force d'exagérer, on perd en crédibilité.
@@jpc7118j'crois qu'il voulais dire 60 kmh sur route
The British introduce the chobram armour just to correct you but the American was the first outside country to use chobram armour
Operationally the U.S. was the first to use Burlington armor. The concept for the Chieftain being fitted with it never went through.
Chobham. Chobham! The 2nd generation being Dorchester armour. The Challenger 2 is an amazing tank about to get better.
This dude said alot alot...I mean alot.
what's the game at 1:35?
Those comparison videos usually end up saying there's no winner. And when they don't end up saying there's no winner, it's biased. So, what's the point ?
M 60 picture is actually a T-72:)
"Leclerc T4 noises "
M60 Patton looks like a t-72 to me ;)
The Abrams rep is awesome.
Good Ol’ T72... I mean M60 😂
XLR AND TERMINATEUR LE CLERC IS WAY BETTER THAN M1 ABRAMS CHALLENGER LEOPARD OR T14 ARMATA
the proper pronunciation of 🇫🇷 tank is Le Claire even though the spelling seems to say Le Clerk. Fyi
Flackpanzer Leclerc isn't a variant, only a photomontage done by GIAT as proof of concept, coming from the very book the picture is from
5:01 tanks in a built up area without infantry support, not a good idea. Silly game designers.
What if they put the AMX 30 cannon into Leclerc? Since AMX 30 has the strongest kinetic round
We don’t say the letter c at the end of Leclerc....🙂
lel did you really just use PHLYDAILY'S footage
without credit, hes used others content to by the looks
@@FtdFacts well it is from warthunder and from PHLYDAILY'S vid welp just saying im not gonna tell him just like surprised XD
Using footage from official War Thunder videos is one thing, using videos from a content creator without credit or permission...das a no no