I feel like it started as fan fiction but at this point the Pixar developers have to take it into account when making a new movie, therefore making it real. But that’s just a theory 🤷🏼♀️
Sooooooooo: The Witch is Boo Supers vs Robots Toys have emotions Animals can talk Earth gets polluted Cars take over Humans come back Humans turn to monsters Boo is the Witch Makes sense to me😂😂😂
Doors in Monsters Inc Can't take them to specific time... Boo's time-line goes in the same time as monster time... You cannot scare same child every night like in Groundhog day....
U miss so much stuff in this such as the time travel with the monsters, it says that they go back in time but can't choose when as they go back in time and the time line is on going so they follow that
Maybe it's less of a Pixar universe, more of a Pixar multi-verse? Like in Spider-man: Into The Spider-verse? Maybe Toy Story, Up, Finding Nemo are the main Pixar universe with Wall-E as it's future and Brave as its past, Monsters Inc is a parallel universe with monsters in it as inter-dimensional travellers and the good dinosaur takes place in a completely separate universe and Coco's land of the living takes place in the main Pixar universe and the land of the dead is pixar's after-life? I know it's complicated, but it actually makes more sense than the official theory Pixar theory.
Or maybe there's no main Pixar universe. Every movie are in their own universe except for the sequels and spin-offs that expand on a preexisting movie. The Toy Story series are in one universe, Up is in another universe, and all the Easter eggs connecting the films are just stuff that Pixar universes have in common. The Pizza Planet truck shows up in all the films because every Pixar universe has a Pizza Planet. The girl from the aquarium in Finding Dory isn't Riley Anderson but a doppelganger of her from the Finding Nemo universe. Andy's postcards aren't from Carl and Ellie from Up, but their Toy Story universe counterparts. If there are many different Peter Parkers in the Marvel multiverse, there could be doppelgangers and variants within the Pixar multiverse to allow the stories to be as self-contained as the writers intend while the animators can throw in in-jokes to assure us that we're watching Pixar movies.
Pixar supposedly confirmed that all of there movies are in the same universe but specifically debunked this theory, thats what ive heard from some youtubers vids idr which one though.
I didn't belive it before but found it kind of fun at least with a "It's nice they got it to work this well" thing. Your points about Monsters Inc shows it really, really doesn't hold up as a theory (and that it was a long time since I saw Monsters Inc given the things I had forgotten, think it was in the cinemas and I haven't seen it since). Your comment that the pizza-planet car wasn't a time and dimension jumping machine delivering pizza everywhere makes me want to see a pixar short where it is though.
@@thomasbennett0 they ignore plot holes, official sources and make stuff up that has literally no evidence to back it up how about bringing up the official video that explains the origins of the monsters and that it takes place in the same world as humans just on a secluded island? Or the sequel comic that includes Sid? These are always ignored If you want to make a theory thats fine but you should always work to fix it not make it worse by ignoring things 1) Monsters Inc is same world, modern day, on a secluded island and they uses doors to teleport around the globe (as thats what it officially is) NOT time travel 2) Cars are just toys being played with by kids (or its a completely different world which it is) and there are more easy fixes I cant remember atm but you get the point thats how you fix a theory. But thats all it will ever be a THEORY so stop using it as if its official or canon cause its not. I love good theories (especially ones about connecting things) but the "Pixar Theory" is not a good one
I think it's just fan fiction, theories are often meant to be more fun than true. The thing is, a slight cameo and Easter eggs shouldn't count. Because, of such common Easter eggs, people could make such theories.
Boo did better than the monsters , the monster's doors can only go back to a certain time like 2018 to 1918 and 2016 to 1916 . But Boo's door can reach any time she want. Besides , how can you be sure that the Boo's door didn't be destroyed again.
Another explanation on how these Pixar movies fit into a universe, is that there's a story that's within that universe. (For example Director Quienton Tarantino's movies share the same universe too. In "Pulp Fiction" the movie where the 2 main characters goes to watch are actually "Kill Bill" and "From Dusk Till Dawn" that Tarantino also directed) And the Pixar movies that I believe are stories within that universe. Like in "Toy Story 2" Mrs Potato head is reading a story "A Bug's Life". And the other stories that I think are within that universe are "The Good Dinosaur" and "Up". (And how "The Incredibles" like we see a kid reading a comic book in "Finding Nemo"? Well the stories were written YEARS AFTER the events of supers that they've AGED really old) Does all of this makes sense to anyone now?
The "theory" is just a fun thing someone connected and obviously is purely fan fun... there is no way that Pixar is working off a universal timeline or super story. Pixar's magic in moviemaking is the creativity and uniqueness of each of their films. If they don't like the direction a movie story is going after it gets started they ... change it... there is no way they would be able to have that creative flexibility if they were tied to hitting plot points of some "Master plan". I kinda hate the "Sequel - mania" that goes on too. I would have been happy to see The Incredibles stay as a single stand alone film. I did end up enjoying the second one and was at least glad that Brad Bird was still in charge of it so it keep his original intent. But for instance, we did NOT really need sequels to the Cars movie. It should have been left as a one time single movie with a creative plot and idea. but they needed to sell toys so... there you go. I think the Sequel-need that so many fans seem to want (not me) is what drives this "Pixar theory" mania. Some people just think the stories all have to keep going and tie together in some neat way, but well, they don't. They should be loved for the individual and creative way they each live in their own little world.
look, do we know it's 100% real? of course not. do we have fun with it? yes. why talk down to us and make us seem like idiots? come on now. i'm really getting tired of screenrant. they get stuff wrong so often, and now they're talking down to us. it's FUN. plain and simple. back off.
extention theory: toy story four: woody learns to think for himself, and gains his spark/his soul. This means he learns to be uman like and probably helped the rebellion between robots and humans onward: it takes place on another planet, I MEAN THERE ARE 2 MOONS. One of the axioms crashed, and the humans inside it evolved into the creatures fo onward. Years later, they developed technology. soul the path between earth and the great beyond as seen in soul, change depend on your culture, which is why joe, a music lover, sees the conveyor belt as similar to a guitar. For mexicans, the conveyor belt is simply the land of the dead Also, when wall-e began his facination with humans, he found his spark and gained a soul
Due to the Frozen creators saying that the parents are the same parents of Tarzan, I think Anna and Elsa are related to Tarzan, Elsa is related to Repunzel which explains her abilities and Ariel finds Anna and Elsa’s parents’ sunken ship in the Little Mermaid. It’s probably not true but it’s my headcanon
I've got two possible theories: 1.that after the events of brave, boo (the witch) traveled to the age of dinosaurs, where somehow she prevented the asteroid collision and created a second reality. 2.That after WAL-E the humans were too fat to get around so they infused themselves with cars creating cyborgs. It would explain the humanlike world they live in and the absence of humans.
If one wants to explain the good dinosaur it's easy enough anyway. 65 millions years isn't as precise as this video makes it sound (or others for that matter), when they released the anniversary Jurassic Park editions recently they didn't change the tagline from "an adventure 65 million years in the making" to "an adventure 65.000.025 years in the making". There could easily still be a gap of fifty thousand years without the "65 millions years" part being wrong. Too much other stuff breaking it as seen in this video however, espesially the monsters inc thing that just straight up dissproves the boo/witch connection and pixar officially saying it's wrong.
The existence of Monster's Inc. and the debunking of the idea that they use time travel implies that they instead use inter-dimensional portals, which would mean that it's not actually a pixar universe, but a pixar MULTIVERSE. The details brought up in this video about the good dinosaur literally sets up that Pixar can depict multiple separate timelines incompatible with each other, so the inconsistencies mentioned could be part of either a different universe or a different timeline. Intentionality is almost impossible, but this is about connecting the stories in-universe less than it is about somehow regressing the intentions of producers. Theories exist between multiple studios, and they are accepted, especially since we know that everything we talk about is false in the first place. They make sense, and do not need to be intentional.
In all reality, no, the animators and storyboarders are not trying to create a massive, interconnected movie-verse. But I do find enjoyment in trying to stitch the movies together. Enjoyment that lasts beyond watching the movies.
1 plot hole (and it could potentially be a big one) with all this is the cars thing. If we’re going by actual mechanics, cars would need to breathe to be able to keep the engine running because in a internal combustion engine (which is what most cars in the series are) you need oxygen to mix with the fuel that when struck by the piston is turned into power which would by logic be the thing keeping them alive.... (Bare with me here.) So in that case the Cars era couldn’t have of happened after wall-E. In fact the cars era would had to of happen prior to wall-E and it would make sense too. Look at it this way, Humans made the AI cars and there became so many of them that humans left and when they came back it was nothing but a waste land due to the lack of oxygen and substantial amount of pollution left by the cars themselves. Thus they made the robots to help clean up the planet, this would also explain all the metal. Finally humans came back and tried to save the planet Would really look forward to feedback on this theory thanks!!
The Cars movies are set in the way distance future after Bugs Life. The cars from the Cars movies evolved from bugs. They had to reset the earth and their calendar and had to rebuilt technology as for why they have memories from the 20th century, but their reset calendar may just start at 1900 as there are no time references before then. The reason why there are no Bugs Life sequels is because the Cars movies are the sequels to Bugs Life. But honestly, the creators should just let the fans decide whether theories are true or not.
I fit odd movies of Disney together anyway..imagine if Zootopia is in the same world as Chicken Little. Are fish and birds segregated? Sushi restaurant in zootopia suggests something... yeah, I'm weird
I don't really see Zootopia and Chicken Little taking place in the same universe personally There are way to many problems with them being in the same universe
Like so many theories, it's really easy to debunk them, but that is not the point of the Pixar Theory. The whole point is to find a way to make it work. That is what makes it fun and exciting. It gives the movie watchers something else to do after having seen it however many times they want to. I first noticed the Pizza Planet truck in several Pixar movies before I learned about the theory and found it to be a fun little game for myself to look for it in every Pixar movie, even going back to movies I had already seen to look for it.
Although this was presented well, a few details on the Pixar theory weren’t quiet right, I recommend watch super Galen brothers. It essentially based its idea on the idea of the ants adapting into cars. This doesn’t make sense but if u watch the idea, all the holes you found are filled in
Wow, this video is so full of incorrect information it hurts. Nowhere in the good dinosaur does it state it is set in our present, an it clearly shows the decline of the dinosaurs and the rise of the humans. It is also very important for the pixar theory because it shows that all species ten towards human-like intelligence over time explaining why all the animals are intelligent. Not enough research done on this one.
The good dinosaur actually doesn't show the decline of the dinosaurs. As much as super Carlin brothers want to think it does. The storm in the movie is just a tornado. Tornados happen every year. The movie shows the dinosaurs doing jobs like normal humans. T Rex's are ranchers on a cattle drive like in old west and the plant water are farmers. So yes the time the movie takes place is more closer to the present. Not anywhere near the 65 million years ago. I would place it more in the time of the old west. So it doesn't and won't ever fit into the Pixar theory since no one at Pixar has ever stated they were on the same time line. Their movies are all stand alone stories.
The dinosaurs died at the end of "The Good Dinosaur", and life could have just evolved from then on... The scare crisis was a lie by the villain of Mosnters Inc, because Sulley beat the scare record at the same time of the crisis. You can't have the bigger number of screams ever in a scream shortage crisis.
Or maybe the other scarers are just not scary enough? Screams are not a resource dug up from the ground. They come from scaring people. Sulley was able to scare a bunch of adults in Monsters University so he's good at scaring desensitized people.
It's fan fiction, otherwise Pixar would've acknowledged this in their movies by now. They just like to reference themselves in their own movies, that's why we keep assuming the movies are connected. They're never going to do it, because Disney never does what someone else thinks of unless they're able to steal it and take all the credit for it. This is something they can't take credit for, so they won't ever do it.
What if The Good Dinosaur and Monsters, Inc. are happening on the same planet. Monsters and dinosaurs just live in other continents and monsters go to scare people on Earth through teleporting doors while the dinosaurs are not even trying to invent the bicycle. By the way both are good films.
Did anyone else notice that random words appeared to be missing from sentences? I'm pretty sure I heard the sentence "Then there's a movie that comes around that doesn't (fit?) into the theory."
12:53 I mean I wouldn't go back in time to become a monkey. and mabey the monsters doesnt even know they evolved fro humands since its so long ago. edit: what if the witch made an alternative timeline. Or mabey the monsters, the monsters are so afraid of tutching human stuff becouse the dont want to change the future. but mabey Sully and Mike after getting to know boo so well. Or since the monsters time doors go back in time to the exact day, mabey boo is just happy to see a big blue monster. and when Sully dies boo will wonder where the blue monster is. so then she goes back in time.
People are too determined to mix all Pixar movies together I mean the title is called Pixar theory And theories are just what the theorist think These guys forgot it’s not cannon it’s a theory
You guys just don't get it. You were clearly just going off the original theory without looking at other people who made your nitpicks make sense. Also it isn't something the writers made up, it is something that fits in despite the lack of effort. I will admit I, myself, have added Disney films into the mix but only the ones after Disney bought Pixar, made by the same people.
Easter Eggs are a fun fan diversion that yeah, people have taken a little too seriously but also I think they hope that if they push this stuff to creators enough they'll get a crossover movie based on it. That said, I will die on the hill of Star Trek and Cloverfield being in the same multiverse. It's a multiverse, after all.
Keelin McCoy That's exactly what they are so, not sure why the quotes are for? Sarcasm? These movies are aimed at kids. Grown people will overthink anything and everything so...
I swear that a few years before Good Dinosaur was released there was a teaser trailer for it to be released the next year, but it never was. I thought that it looked better than the version we got. Does that trailer exist anywhere.
It's a really bad theory that makes too many assumptions, seriously if it was a research paper the teacher/professor would give it an F, there's too many things that literally have no proof in the movies. Boo became a witch, okay how was Boo getting into witch craft even alluded too? Yes the witch in Brave has a carving of Sully but by this same logic, his fur appearing on the toilet seat in one of the Toy Story movies/shorts would imply that he ended up in that universe and was then killed and the family just puts his fur on their toilet for some reason? It's an easter egg. Also Sully meets Boo again at the end of the movie due to Mike fixing the door, we currently have no proof that the door was re-destroyed. Why do the monsters have to keep track of time in the universe they are going into if they are time traveling? It's obvious they are in a parallel universe not the same universe but in the future. Also if Monsters Inc is post-WALL-E than why is their an energy crisis? The Axiom seemed to have had a very good power source (it was probably some type of nuclear source) and WALL-E also confirms that solar power and wind turbines exists. I'd think there would be better and easier ways to get energy than to be scaring kids. It's obvious that the monsters universe is in a parallel universe where they never developed better ways of energy production. Car's doesn't work, the world is clean in the cars universe and they have a flashback to the 60's when The Incredibles would be taking place. They also build real world stuff in it like Interstate 40 which should have still existed when WALL-E was happening. Also I do believe that a kid loving a toy brings it to life as all the Buzzs' seem to be sleeping in Toy Story 2 and all the display figures are alive but there's no proof that this would also apply to the cars. Also, one thing done to the theory to mitigate the cars clearly being from different eras is that the cars woke up in the order that they were built and got owners prior to the human evacuation, once again, this is based on nothing. Bugs Life toys appear in Toy Story 2 in the background, it's clearly a movie in that universe. Also toy story toys are in Finding Nemo and kids definitely played with those, are those toys just wondering around the waiting room while the fish are also there, I mean it's possible I guess but I would wonder if the fish would realize that they weren't human. I know the toys interact with the dog in Toy Story 2 but that dog was just like a normal dog as opposed to having human level intelligence like those fish so there's a big difference there. The thing is, I do think some movies could share a universe, I like all the smart animal movies taking place in the same one, I just don't like the idea of them knowing each other like how Remmy in Paris was supposed to have influenced that guy in South America in Up when he was cut off from everything. I also think WALL-E could share this universe as the roach is more intelligent than an average roach in WALL-E and BNL is a big part to Up's story as well as WALL-E as opposed to being some throw away easter egg like in Toy Story 3 for example. A few others could also share a universe but trying to put cars into any of them just ruins them. Also, that Tree in A Bugs Life is supposed to be the same one from WALL-E, no it's not, the area around it is nothing alike. Really, this just reminds me of a bunch of crazy conspiracy theories though at least nothing is being harmed here. It's actually kind of interesting it a way as far as a study of conspiracy theories as you can see the leaps in logic made. I do like to attempt to connect every new movie they make into the theory though but mainly just as a game now as I don't believe the theory actually works.
I think you just missed the entire purpose of the Pixar theory, which is for fun. Even the official website for it says it’s for fun. No one I’ve encountered who are fans of the theory take it seriously. They’re just having fun trying to connect all the Pixar movies together. Personally I don’t see the harm in it.
In my opinion the monster’s universe and the good dinosaur’s are a same universe in a different timeline, being the monsters more evolved, this way the good dinosaur would fit perfectly in the theory. But there are many other plot holes. Tell me, what’s your opinion?
lol, its just fan fiction and you are taking it too seriosly... ofcourse pixar films are not made to fit in one universe, its just fans playing with this possibility and looking for possible connections between movies... pixar theory is for fun for fans by fans, little what-if story for these who thinks these who want more story to their favorite movies... its theory, its not real so it will bend around every film there will be, thats the fun here, try to make it possible, trying to debunk it just make it stronger cause you show where it still have to be bend a bit so it add up together... i like pixar theory, its fun and interesting to thought about these films like this and its nice filler while you waiting for next movie, caues it doesnt change the story of the movies
That would not be true the theories about cars being before Wall e just doesn't work being that when Wally first drove through a highway you'll see videos and pictures of the human beings that were there so that's not true at all because there were no human beings in cars or no references so it couldn't be that either I think cars could be after all that
lol, of course the pixar theory isn't "real" or intent of the creators. Doesn't mean we can't have fun. Btw, I find that for example the SuperCarlinBrothers always come up with a lot of fixes for what you call plot holes.
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
I feel like it started as fan fiction but at this point the Pixar developers have to take it into account when making a new movie, therefore making it real. But that’s just a theory 🤷🏼♀️
A FILM THEORY! AAAND CUT!
A GAME THEORY
Milly Godwin A MILLY THEORY! AAAAANNNNNNNDDDDD CUT!
They don't have to take it into account at all though
Milly Godwin A FILM THEORY
Sooooooooo:
The Witch is Boo
Supers vs Robots
Toys have emotions
Animals can talk
Earth gets polluted
Cars take over
Humans come back
Humans turn to monsters
Boo is the Witch
Makes sense to me😂😂😂
lol!!
the way it happened makes sense
Bada bing bada boom we have the
Pixar theory
Your being sarcastic, right?
@C&V-debunkers.95x fair enough. I've grown to question the theory.
The Good Dinosaur sets up the alternate Pixar timeline
I agree
I don't believe the theories, but I find them fun to learn about
Same
Doors in Monsters Inc Can't take them to specific time... Boo's time-line goes in the same time as monster time... You cannot scare same child every night like in Groundhog day....
Super Carlin brothers has a good interpretation of the theory. They pretty much tie in everything and explain the plot holes that this vid presents.
And Bobsheaux debunked it.
Monster truck inc
Remember in cars monsters inc was in the theater
U miss so much stuff in this such as the time travel with the monsters, it says that they go back in time but can't choose when as they go back in time and the time line is on going so they follow that
Maybe it's less of a Pixar universe, more of a Pixar multi-verse? Like in Spider-man: Into The Spider-verse? Maybe Toy Story, Up, Finding Nemo are the main Pixar universe with Wall-E as it's future and Brave as its past, Monsters Inc is a parallel universe with monsters in it as inter-dimensional travellers and the good dinosaur takes place in a completely separate universe and Coco's land of the living takes place in the main Pixar universe and the land of the dead is pixar's after-life? I know it's complicated, but it actually makes more sense than the official theory Pixar theory.
Or maybe there's no main Pixar universe. Every movie are in their own universe except for the sequels and spin-offs that expand on a preexisting movie. The Toy Story series are in one universe, Up is in another universe, and all the Easter eggs connecting the films are just stuff that Pixar universes have in common. The Pizza Planet truck shows up in all the films because every Pixar universe has a Pizza Planet. The girl from the aquarium in Finding Dory isn't Riley Anderson but a doppelganger of her from the Finding Nemo universe. Andy's postcards aren't from Carl and Ellie from Up, but their Toy Story universe counterparts. If there are many different Peter Parkers in the Marvel multiverse, there could be doppelgangers and variants within the Pixar multiverse to allow the stories to be as self-contained as the writers intend while the animators can throw in in-jokes to assure us that we're watching Pixar movies.
@@SeanWheeler100 yeah... Or your idea.
Pixar supposedly confirmed that all of there movies are in the same universe but specifically debunked this theory, thats what ive heard from some youtubers vids idr which one though.
Pixar never confirmed all their movies as being in the same universe. They've only debunked that idea.
You must be fun at parties..
*Screen Rant: Is Santa real or not?*
Lyndii Mey no
I didn't belive it before but found it kind of fun at least with a "It's nice they got it to work this well" thing. Your points about Monsters Inc shows it really, really doesn't hold up as a theory (and that it was a long time since I saw Monsters Inc given the things I had forgotten, think it was in the cinemas and I haven't seen it since). Your comment that the pizza-planet car wasn't a time and dimension jumping machine delivering pizza everywhere makes me want to see a pixar short where it is though.
I am telling the supercarlinbothers about the plot holes that your are talking about in the pixar theory and they will debunk all the plot holes.
Will they debunk what people from Pixar have said about it that debunks it completely?
@@hayo_hru they will they always debunk plot holes about the pixar theory.
@@thomasbennett0 and disregard the creative vision of the Pixar team? Just making sure I got it right
@@thomasbennett0 they ignore plot holes, official sources and make stuff up that has literally no evidence to back it up
how about bringing up the official video that explains the origins of the monsters and that it takes place in the same world as humans just on a secluded island? Or the sequel comic that includes Sid? These are always ignored
If you want to make a theory thats fine but you should always work to fix it not make it worse by ignoring things
1) Monsters Inc is same world, modern day, on a secluded island and they uses doors to teleport around the globe (as thats what it officially is) NOT time travel
2) Cars are just toys being played with by kids (or its a completely different world which it is)
and there are more easy fixes I cant remember atm but you get the point
thats how you fix a theory. But thats all it will ever be a THEORY so stop using it as if its official or canon cause its not. I love good theories (especially ones about connecting things) but the "Pixar Theory" is not a good one
@@tatsudragneel4761 they have debunked plot holes in the pixar theory before in 1 video.
You know what guys and girls. I will always love the movies of Pixar no matter if they are connected to each other, or not. That´s all. ;-)
I think it's just fan fiction, theories are often meant to be more fun than true. The thing is, a slight cameo and Easter eggs shouldn't count. Because, of such common Easter eggs, people could make such theories.
Boo did better than the monsters , the monster's doors can only go back to a certain time like 2018 to 1918 and 2016 to 1916 . But Boo's door can reach any time she want. Besides , how can you be sure that the Boo's door didn't be destroyed again.
Another explanation on how these Pixar movies fit into a universe, is that there's a story that's within that universe.
(For example Director Quienton Tarantino's movies share the same universe too.
In "Pulp Fiction" the movie where the 2 main characters goes to watch are actually "Kill Bill" and "From Dusk Till Dawn" that Tarantino also directed)
And the Pixar movies that I believe are stories within that universe.
Like in "Toy Story 2" Mrs Potato head is reading a story "A Bug's Life". And the other stories that I think are within that universe are "The Good Dinosaur" and "Up".
(And how "The Incredibles" like we see a kid reading a comic book in "Finding Nemo"? Well the stories were written YEARS AFTER the events of supers that they've AGED really old)
Does all of this makes sense to anyone now?
Screen rant makes video debunking the Pixar theory, makes video about Pixar theory 3 months later.
Pixar: Am I a joke to you?
We don’t need theories. We need burgers.
This Pixar theory makes no sense
Thank you for debunking this endlessly frustrating, illogical theory.
The "theory" is just a fun thing someone connected and obviously is purely fan fun... there is no way that Pixar is working off a universal timeline or super story. Pixar's magic in moviemaking is the creativity and uniqueness of each of their films. If they don't like the direction a movie story is going after it gets started they ... change it... there is no way they would be able to have that creative flexibility if they were tied to hitting plot points of some "Master plan". I kinda hate the "Sequel - mania" that goes on too. I would have been happy to see The Incredibles stay as a single stand alone film. I did end up enjoying the second one and was at least glad that Brad Bird was still in charge of it so it keep his original intent. But for instance, we did NOT really need sequels to the Cars movie. It should have been left as a one time single movie with a creative plot and idea. but they needed to sell toys so... there you go. I think the Sequel-need that so many fans seem to want (not me) is what drives this "Pixar theory" mania. Some people just think the stories all have to keep going and tie together in some neat way, but well, they don't. They should be loved for the individual and creative way they each live in their own little world.
The only reason Sully was in Brave is because Pixar always puts an Easter egg for their upcoming movie, and Monsters U came after Brave.
look, do we know it's 100% real? of course not. do we have fun with it? yes. why talk down to us and make us seem like idiots? come on now. i'm really getting tired of screenrant. they get stuff wrong so often, and now they're talking down to us. it's FUN. plain and simple. back off.
Man those documentaries are awesome, make more like these
extention theory:
toy story four:
woody learns to think for himself, and gains his spark/his soul. This means he learns to be uman like and probably helped the rebellion between robots and humans
onward:
it takes place on another planet, I MEAN THERE ARE 2 MOONS. One of the axioms crashed, and the humans inside it evolved into the creatures fo onward. Years later, they developed technology.
soul
the path between earth and the great beyond as seen in soul, change depend on your culture, which is why joe, a music lover, sees the conveyor belt as similar to a guitar. For mexicans, the conveyor belt is simply the land of the dead
Also, when wall-e began his facination with humans, he found his spark and gained a soul
Is there anyone who actually believes the Pixar theory is something the writers really did on purpose? That’s not really the point.
I believe in it
It’s just fan fiction people put together which makes the Pixar Universe interesting.
But you can't deny that the story somehow connect in one another. Say it an Easter egg or cameo, but there's a fact that they do connected. 😅
Due to the Frozen creators saying that the parents are the same parents of Tarzan, I think Anna and Elsa are related to Tarzan, Elsa is related to Repunzel which explains her abilities and Ariel finds Anna and Elsa’s parents’ sunken ship in the Little Mermaid. It’s probably not true but it’s my headcanon
They have a movie in the works with two brothers. It’s called Two Brothers, just Two Brothers.
I think that the Pixar Theroy starts with the good dinosaur and right before the times of brave they went extinct.
Imagine Pixar saw the theory and decided to make movies that didn’t make sense in the theory
I've got two possible theories:
1.that after the events of brave, boo (the witch) traveled to the age of dinosaurs, where somehow she prevented the asteroid collision and created a second reality.
2.That after WAL-E the humans were too fat to get around so they infused themselves with cars creating cyborgs. It would explain the humanlike world they live in and the absence of humans.
It's just fan fiction.
Boo went to the past and made a machine that could push the meteor.
Interesting
damn..........
not true at all,watch the movies,please
If one wants to explain the good dinosaur it's easy enough anyway. 65 millions years isn't as precise as this video makes it sound (or others for that matter), when they released the anniversary Jurassic Park editions recently they didn't change the tagline from "an adventure 65 million years in the making" to "an adventure 65.000.025 years in the making". There could easily still be a gap of fifty thousand years without the "65 millions years" part being wrong. Too much other stuff breaking it as seen in this video however, espesially the monsters inc thing that just straight up dissproves the boo/witch connection and pixar officially saying it's wrong.
Leo Gunnemarsson true but...Pixar might just be saying it’s wrong as a lie? Not my theory, I don’t believe tpt
The existence of Monster's Inc. and the debunking of the idea that they use time travel implies that they instead use inter-dimensional portals, which would mean that it's not actually a pixar universe, but a pixar MULTIVERSE. The details brought up in this video about the good dinosaur literally sets up that Pixar can depict multiple separate timelines incompatible with each other, so the inconsistencies mentioned could be part of either a different universe or a different timeline. Intentionality is almost impossible, but this is about connecting the stories in-universe less than it is about somehow regressing the intentions of producers. Theories exist between multiple studios, and they are accepted, especially since we know that everything we talk about is false in the first place. They make sense, and do not need to be intentional.
In all reality, no, the animators and storyboarders are not trying to create a massive, interconnected movie-verse. But I do find enjoyment in trying to stitch the movies together. Enjoyment that lasts beyond watching the movies.
1 plot hole (and it could potentially be a big one) with all this is the cars thing. If we’re going by actual mechanics, cars would need to breathe to be able to keep the engine running because in a internal combustion engine (which is what most cars in the series are) you need oxygen to mix with the fuel that when struck by the piston is turned into power which would by logic be the thing keeping them alive....
(Bare with me here.)
So in that case the Cars era couldn’t have of happened after wall-E. In fact the cars era would had to of happen prior to wall-E and it would make sense too. Look at it this way, Humans made the AI cars and there became so many of them that humans left and when they came back it was nothing but a waste land due to the lack of oxygen and substantial amount of pollution left by the cars themselves. Thus they made the robots to help clean up the planet, this would also explain all the metal. Finally humans came back and tried to save the planet
Would really look forward to feedback on this theory thanks!!
The Cars movies are set in the way distance future after Bugs Life. The cars from the Cars movies evolved from bugs. They had to reset the earth and their calendar and had to rebuilt technology as for why they have memories from the 20th century, but their reset calendar may just start at 1900 as there are no time references before then. The reason why there are no Bugs Life sequels is because the Cars movies are the sequels to Bugs Life. But honestly, the creators should just let the fans decide whether theories are true or not.
I fit odd movies of Disney together anyway..imagine if Zootopia is in the same world as Chicken Little. Are fish and birds segregated? Sushi restaurant in zootopia suggests something... yeah, I'm weird
I don't really see Zootopia and Chicken Little taking place in the same universe personally
There are way to many problems with them being in the same universe
"If you try to debunk the Pixar Theory, you have missed the point of the Pixar Theory." -SuperCarlinBrothers.
They just torpedoed their credibility.
Like so many theories, it's really easy to debunk them, but that is not the point of the Pixar Theory. The whole point is to find a way to make it work. That is what makes it fun and exciting. It gives the movie watchers something else to do after having seen it however many times they want to. I first noticed the Pizza Planet truck in several Pixar movies before I learned about the theory and found it to be a fun little game for myself to look for it in every Pixar movie, even going back to movies I had already seen to look for it.
Very Informative video. You guys did a realky great job on this one.
Everything Disney releases are connected. From past to future when cars started to talk right after Walle the robot. There’s a long theory about it
Although this was presented well, a few details on the Pixar theory weren’t quiet right, I recommend watch super Galen brothers. It essentially based its idea on the idea of the ants adapting into cars. This doesn’t make sense but if u watch the idea, all the holes you found are filled in
Oh yeah, just rip off SuperCarlinBrothers recent video
no scb rip them off
It's not time travel " kids just don't get as scared as they used to"
Wow, this video is so full of incorrect information it hurts. Nowhere in the good dinosaur does it state it is set in our present, an it clearly shows the decline of the dinosaurs and the rise of the humans. It is also very important for the pixar theory because it shows that all species ten towards human-like intelligence over time explaining why all the animals are intelligent. Not enough research done on this one.
RowleyRambles thank you! That good dinosaur bit made me angry. Said one thing but showed another.
The good dinosaur actually doesn't show the decline of the dinosaurs. As much as super Carlin brothers want to think it does. The storm in the movie is just a tornado. Tornados happen every year. The movie shows the dinosaurs doing jobs like normal humans. T Rex's are ranchers on a cattle drive like in old west and the plant water are farmers. So yes the time the movie takes place is more closer to the present. Not anywhere near the 65 million years ago. I would place it more in the time of the old west. So it doesn't and won't ever fit into the Pixar theory since no one at Pixar has ever stated they were on the same time line. Their movies are all stand alone stories.
RowleyRambles Has
This specific version of the theory and there is a more accurate on on another youtube channel called
"Supercarlinbrothers" and it does explain how the good dinosaur fits in very well
The dinosaurs died at the end of "The Good Dinosaur", and life could have just evolved from then on... The scare crisis was a lie by the villain of Mosnters Inc, because Sulley beat the scare record at the same time of the crisis. You can't have the bigger number of screams ever in a scream shortage crisis.
Or maybe the other scarers are just not scary enough? Screams are not a resource dug up from the ground. They come from scaring people. Sulley was able to scare a bunch of adults in Monsters University so he's good at scaring desensitized people.
I think it should begin with the good dinosaur
The Pixar THEORY? More like The Pixar FANFIC!!!!!!!!!!
It's fan fiction, otherwise Pixar would've acknowledged this in their movies by now. They just like to reference themselves in their own movies, that's why we keep assuming the movies are connected. They're never going to do it, because Disney never does what someone else thinks of unless they're able to steal it and take all the credit for it. This is something they can't take credit for, so they won't ever do it.
What if The Good Dinosaur and Monsters, Inc. are happening on the same planet. Monsters and dinosaurs just live in other continents and monsters go to scare people on Earth through teleporting doors while the dinosaurs are not even trying to invent the bicycle. By the way both are good films.
Finally, I'm no longer the only one noticing the plot holes proving these theories wrong.
Far less popular was my "The Shakespeare Theory: What if all 37 of The Bard's plays took place in the same world?"
Did anyone else notice that random words appeared to be missing from sentences? I'm pretty sure I heard the sentence "Then there's a movie that comes around that doesn't (fit?) into the theory."
I think the witch from brave is the evil Queen from snow white
I want someone to include the 3d Disney films aswell. Just not Wreck it Ralph 2
Great video!!! PIXAR!!!!
They already messed up the theory with boo
A lot of this theory boils down to just accepting thing, no real connection.
10:49 Technecally an alternate timeline can be the same universe
i like the big company secret idea
Some movies could
Be connected but not all of them
12:53 I mean I wouldn't go back in time to become a monkey. and mabey the monsters doesnt even know they evolved fro humands since its so long ago.
edit: what if the witch made an alternative timeline.
Or mabey the monsters, the monsters are so afraid of tutching human stuff becouse the dont want to change the future. but mabey Sully and Mike after getting to know boo so well.
Or since the monsters time doors go back in time to the exact day, mabey boo is just happy to see a big blue monster. and when Sully dies boo will wonder where the blue monster is. so then she goes back in time.
Why can't they all be in the same Universe just without a bunch of ties
I like Pixar!!
Who else?
Cool. Meh too
I like Disney and Pixar
MEEEEEE
@Matheus Gazotto me
@@ironman8623 Me too
People are too determined to mix all Pixar movies together
I mean the title is called Pixar theory
And theories are just what the theorist think
These guys forgot it’s not cannon it’s a theory
You guys just don't get it. You were clearly just going off the original theory without looking at other people who made your nitpicks make sense. Also it isn't something the writers made up, it is something that fits in despite the lack of effort. I will admit I, myself, have added Disney films into the mix but only the ones after Disney bought Pixar, made by the same people.
Cars is the life of cars when they have there humans inside them
If you watched Wreck it Ralph 2 You see tons of cameos meaning it’s connected
Easter Eggs are a fun fan diversion that yeah, people have taken a little too seriously but also I think they hope that if they push this stuff to creators enough they'll get a crossover movie based on it.
That said, I will die on the hill of Star Trek and Cloverfield being in the same multiverse. It's a multiverse, after all.
A way cars could’ve been in the timeline is humans evolve into cars and vehicles due to the 0 point energy
Grown men over thinking kids movies 😂
"kids movies" okay
Keelin McCoy That's exactly what they are so, not sure why the quotes are for? Sarcasm? These movies are aimed at kids. Grown people will overthink anything and everything so...
@@ARx0xoo Maybe except Cars 3 though, it was more about the actual sports scenario focussing on age catching up and retirement.
Adithya Prasad Regardless it's a kids movie aswell.
@@ARx0xoo okay and the grown men talking about it grew up with these movies.
I swear that a few years before Good Dinosaur was released there was a teaser trailer for it to be released the next year, but it never was. I thought that it looked better than the version we got. Does that trailer exist anywhere.
Did the Pixar theory happen to come about because of the MCU? Or did Marvel capitalise on that. I can't remember which came first
You forgot about the tree in a Bugs Life is the same tree from WALL E's end credits
I believe The Disney and Pixar theory can exist one in the same, because of the Brave's witch.
It’s not a time line, its 4 timelines in a multiverse. Good dinosaur/human and animals/cars/monsters
There are too many theories anymore to keep up with!
All im thinking...
SO WHAT! if it is!?
SO what if its not!?
It doesnt matter... AT ALL.
As soon as I work for Disney I’m breaking the Pixar theory and I will help u all with the Pixar theory
or the Wisp magic also shares in the Disney theory , like talking animals, and no humans in The Lion King or Zootopia.
The Pixar Theory is in no way easy, and too much an inconvenience to be true...
It's a really bad theory that makes too many assumptions, seriously if it was a research paper the teacher/professor would give it an F, there's too many things that literally have no proof in the movies. Boo became a witch, okay how was Boo getting into witch craft even alluded too? Yes the witch in Brave has a carving of Sully but by this same logic, his fur appearing on the toilet seat in one of the Toy Story movies/shorts would imply that he ended up in that universe and was then killed and the family just puts his fur on their toilet for some reason? It's an easter egg. Also Sully meets Boo again at the end of the movie due to Mike fixing the door, we currently have no proof that the door was re-destroyed. Why do the monsters have to keep track of time in the universe they are going into if they are time traveling? It's obvious they are in a parallel universe not the same universe but in the future. Also if Monsters Inc is post-WALL-E than why is their an energy crisis? The Axiom seemed to have had a very good power source (it was probably some type of nuclear source) and WALL-E also confirms that solar power and wind turbines exists. I'd think there would be better and easier ways to get energy than to be scaring kids. It's obvious that the monsters universe is in a parallel universe where they never developed better ways of energy production.
Car's doesn't work, the world is clean in the cars universe and they have a flashback to the 60's when The Incredibles would be taking place. They also build real world stuff in it like Interstate 40 which should have still existed when WALL-E was happening. Also I do believe that a kid loving a toy brings it to life as all the Buzzs' seem to be sleeping in Toy Story 2 and all the display figures are alive but there's no proof that this would also apply to the cars. Also, one thing done to the theory to mitigate the cars clearly being from different eras is that the cars woke up in the order that they were built and got owners prior to the human evacuation, once again, this is based on nothing.
Bugs Life toys appear in Toy Story 2 in the background, it's clearly a movie in that universe. Also toy story toys are in Finding Nemo and kids definitely played with those, are those toys just wondering around the waiting room while the fish are also there, I mean it's possible I guess but I would wonder if the fish would realize that they weren't human. I know the toys interact with the dog in Toy Story 2 but that dog was just like a normal dog as opposed to having human level intelligence like those fish so there's a big difference there.
The thing is, I do think some movies could share a universe, I like all the smart animal movies taking place in the same one, I just don't like the idea of them knowing each other like how Remmy in Paris was supposed to have influenced that guy in South America in Up when he was cut off from everything. I also think WALL-E could share this universe as the roach is more intelligent than an average roach in WALL-E and BNL is a big part to Up's story as well as WALL-E as opposed to being some throw away easter egg like in Toy Story 3 for example. A few others could also share a universe but trying to put cars into any of them just ruins them. Also, that Tree in A Bugs Life is supposed to be the same one from WALL-E, no it's not, the area around it is nothing alike.
Really, this just reminds me of a bunch of crazy conspiracy theories though at least nothing is being harmed here. It's actually kind of interesting it a way as far as a study of conspiracy theories as you can see the leaps in logic made.
I do like to attempt to connect every new movie they make into the theory though but mainly just as a game now as I don't believe the theory actually works.
I bet you guys are fun at parties
Okay so the theory isn't real but the guy that started it got people talking about it for years to come.
I refuse to accept they were mere Easter eggs, that is just lazy
I’ve been reading the comments and....SUPERCARLINBROTHERS FOR THE WIN
I cant tell the difference between Disney movies and Pixar movies
I think you just missed the entire purpose of the Pixar theory, which is for fun. Even the official website for it says it’s for fun. No one I’ve encountered who are fans of the theory take it seriously. They’re just having fun trying to connect all the Pixar movies together. Personally I don’t see the harm in it.
In my opinion the monster’s universe and the good dinosaur’s are a same universe in a different timeline, being the monsters more evolved, this way the good dinosaur would fit perfectly in the theory. But there are many other plot holes. Tell me, what’s your opinion?
SuperCarl Brothers..
Fan fiction
There are humans in A Bug's Life. Flik gets stuck in gum on the bottom of a human's shoe.
Tim Wylie that’s ants
@@bowtotheking8403 sonofabitch... Lol. You're absolutely correct. 😁
Captain Marvel trailer is at the official Marvel channel
Bugs life in a moment a bug shows a sign that said a child hurt him
lol, its just fan fiction and you are taking it too seriosly... ofcourse pixar films are not made to fit in one universe, its just fans playing with this possibility and looking for possible connections between movies... pixar theory is for fun for fans by fans, little what-if story for these who thinks these who want more story to their favorite movies... its theory, its not real so it will bend around every film there will be, thats the fun here, try to make it possible, trying to debunk it just make it stronger cause you show where it still have to be bend a bit so it add up together... i like pixar theory, its fun and interesting to thought about these films like this and its nice filler while you waiting for next movie, caues it doesnt change the story of the movies
That would not be true the theories about cars being before Wall e just doesn't work being that when Wally first drove through a highway you'll see videos and pictures of the human beings that were there so that's not true at all because there were no human beings in cars or no references so it couldn't be that either I think cars could be after all that
lol, of course the pixar theory isn't "real" or intent of the creators. Doesn't mean we can't have fun. Btw, I find that for example the SuperCarlinBrothers always come up with a lot of fixes for what you call plot holes.
Some movies may be in same universe, but certainly not all.