Battle of Britain - How Not To Invade The UK Part 1 - Introduction

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2024
  • CORRECTION NOTICE - I managed to confuse the OKH and the OKW half way through this video
    OKW -Armed forces high command under Keitel
    OKH - Army high command under von Brauchitsch
    This is the first part of a multi-part project to look at bits of the Battle of Britain, and this one is really just scene setting. It's also the first video since Lazerpig was good enough to shout me out on his channel
    A few important notes
    1. I do not use the word Nuclear at all during the video, so hopefully those who are triggered by how I say it can watch in safety
    2. I insult no one’s favourite flying machine. That’s coming up next time.
    3. Feedback is always welcome unless you’re a Nazi fanboy, in which case feel free to defenestrate yourself.
    Videos with kind permission of the Imperial War Museum; become a member here - www.iwm.org.uk...
    Music licensed under Content ID from Epidemic Sounds and Motion Array

ความคิดเห็น • 990

  • @kevinw4267
    @kevinw4267 ปีที่แล้ว +1256

    Don’t be so humbled, people maybe here because of lazerpig but they stay because of your content. I watched your entire channel, and decided to subscribe because I like them

    • @AndreiOnu
      @AndreiOnu ปีที่แล้ว +58

      same here

    •  ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Ditto

    • @connormoylan2466
      @connormoylan2466 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Same

    • @big_elli8981
      @big_elli8981 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Same. Your content is excellent man.

    • @le_travie7724
      @le_travie7724 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      agreed.

  • @MostlyPennyCat
    @MostlyPennyCat ปีที่แล้ว +272

    I highly recommend including stories of the British Petroleum Warfare Department.
    It really hammers home the, "We're not trapped on an island with you, you're trapped in an island with _us"_ notion of SeaLion. 😂
    In the mean time, joly well done old boy, capital stuff.

    • @TimPerfetto
      @TimPerfetto ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh you are one of the BP scabs that eats hair and denies it well I know you eat hair I saw you and it was gross but also sad

    • @robincole1140
      @robincole1140 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Not necessarily trapped, more Revenged off the Island (yes, I too wish this was a Repulse opp). Would have been much more fitting. th-cam.com/video/NMUfY38pUmM/w-d-xo.html

    • @MostlyPennyCat
      @MostlyPennyCat ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@robincole1140
      Oh they weren't getting off this island...

    • @adder3597
      @adder3597 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@MostlyPennyCat Oh, absolutely. Had Sealion put Nazi jackboots on the south coast, we'd most likely have made Viet Nam for Americans look like a relative success.

    • @davethompson3326
      @davethompson3326 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They were a great asset later, with both Pluto and Fido being extremely useful to war effectiveness.

  • @gonvillebromhead2865
    @gonvillebromhead2865 ปีที่แล้ว +177

    There is an interesting phenomenon on TH-cam, in which I'll find a youtuber talking about something I have an interest in but limited knowledge about in an entertaining manner, follow them, watch a few of their videos, enjoy them, absorb the information. And then they get onto a subject I do know about, and it turns out they are talking bollocks - and everything they have previously said comes into question. This has happened enough that I tend to be very trepidatious with new (especially history) TH-camrs.
    Being married to an academic RAF historian, working for the RAF, and having an amateur interest in the RAF's history myself, I can safely say you have cleared that hurdle; really excited to see how this series and the channel as a whole progresses!

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +45

      To Err is human - I make no promises to get it all right!

    • @MagereHein
      @MagereHein 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ooh, a history dependa! Must be right, then!

    • @mikoto7693
      @mikoto7693 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      As a modern civilian airline aviation geek, I can totally sympathise with this. First it was because I was learning independently. Then it was because I got a job as ground crew (aircraft harder while they’re on the ground) which gave me access to real pilots and engineers to learn from.
      And then I became the girlfriend of an airline pilot and after that my education really accelerated. Safe to say that it really annoys me when I see TH-camrs peddling myths that aren’t true.

  • @AnimarchyHistory
    @AnimarchyHistory ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Hitler had ONE chance to win the war. Halifax is chosen instead of Churchill and he seeks terms. As long as Britain stays in the war, Germany loses.
    I can’t wait for this series. Half tempted to get in on the action, shitting on Lee Mallory and Goering is a hobby of mine.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Totally agree - and if you want to have a pop at either feel free (I'm on Piggy's Discord if you want to talk about it)

    • @marklittle8805
      @marklittle8805 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You had me at shitting on Leigh Mallory...

    • @andrewgause6971
      @andrewgause6971 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Makes sense. The British staying in the war forces him to keep forces deployed over there in France and Africa rather than committing all out to Barbarosa. Combined with Lend Lease, and and his stupid decision to then declare war on the U.S. when he didn't have to... and well... (insert Sad Trumbone noises here)

    • @Svabre
      @Svabre 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@andrewgause6971The declaration of war on the US doesn’t actually matter that much here, because Roosevelt was certainly already looking for any and all ways to convince the house and/or the senate to agree on such a war anyway. All a more “diplomatic” approach would have done is slightly delay their entry into the war until some uboat did something extraordinarily stupid (again) or until some guy in the senate ate a bad sandwich and decided “THAT’S IT! I’M MAD NOW! TIME TO GO TO GERMANY!”.

    • @andrewgause6971
      @andrewgause6971 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Svabre Oh, Roosevelt absolutely was looking for a reason to deal with Germany. I just don't think Angry Mustache Man giving him a *gift wrapped* reason (without an assurance from Japan that they would also declare war on the USSR) was a wise move on his part.

  • @richardgro6456
    @richardgro6456 ปีที่แล้ว +274

    Germany 1940 : Lets smash Britain. ; Me a Casual german : British man give me more content of how stupid my ancestors country was !! Keep it up mate. I really enjoy your content

    • @tonyduncan9852
      @tonyduncan9852 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      You are silly because we're all the same (although maybe less polylingual).

    • @muir8009
      @muir8009 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Just remember: at other times your ancestors country also built Cologne Cathedral, and gave the world Beethoven and Bach (and operas that last 3 bloody days!) And Trans Europ Express, and the Hollentahlbahn

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +80

      It was a rather specific subset of your forefathers that I'm upset with - and I'd like to stress it's that generation, over which you had no control. In the same way my forebears started the Atlantic slave trade, and we should be cross with them for it but neither you nor I did those things, we can't change them, all we can do is learn and hope to stop it repeating.

    • @Silverhks
      @Silverhks ปีที่แล้ว +14

      ​@@HardThrasher that's the tough one right there.
      Stop repeating the major mistakes

    • @MostlyPennyCat
      @MostlyPennyCat ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​​@@HardThrasherUm, that was the Portuguese wasn't it?
      Those naughty little not-spaniards

  • @MegaScorpio95
    @MegaScorpio95 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    I am here because of the pig. You are superb in your own right, flappy gun port shot aside ;) Very pleased to have found your channel, please keep up the good work!

    • @OPFlyFisher304
      @OPFlyFisher304 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      That line and clip made me laugh out loud at the office. I grew up watching flappy gunport shots. Sent the vid to my brother he said he laughed as well.

  • @nerdyali4154
    @nerdyali4154 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    You can say what you want about Churchill, but he did something no other leader has done in recent history to my knowledge. He served as First Lord of the Admiralty at the start off WWI, and was apparently damned good at the job, but he was responsible for the Dardanelles disaster and was demoted. He resigned, joined the Royal Scots Fusiliers and served in the trenches on the Western Front. How many people would go from such lofty heights to the trenches by choice? He never forgot the Dardanelles and always deferred to his senior staff in WW2, although probably with much bad language involved.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Totally agree

    • @marklittle8805
      @marklittle8805 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Churchill was if anything else willing to place his ass on the line. No other leader was...even on D day he wanted to hit the beach as soon as possible. The King had to tell him no

    • @Svabre
      @Svabre 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Sadly he still made a few… *interesting* decisions, especially regarding the colonial fronts😅

  • @milgeekmedia
    @milgeekmedia ปีที่แล้ว +104

    Excellent... My mother was in the ATS and 'manned' (!) AA gun sites in Crystal Palace during The Blitz. She worked on the early radar identifying target, so in a huge irony she actually more real combat action than my father who served in the 8th Army in North Africa, but in 'supplies'. It would be nice if you gave the tiniest of nods to the women who served in the ATS as the Government never did award a campaign star medal for the 'Home Front'. Excellent work, looking forward to the next part.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +45

      It was a complete travesty frankly. Not planning to talk about the ATS specifically but the role of women in the battle absolutely

    • @milgeekmedia
      @milgeekmedia ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@HardThrasher I understand - blimey, it's a big endeavour! Good luck with it... Did Galland really ask Göring for Spitfires? LOL ;)

    • @tonyduncan9852
      @tonyduncan9852 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes. What's not to like?

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Yeah, he really did. But he thought Georing was an idiot and liked to wind him up. They had a weird relationship

    • @muir8009
      @muir8009 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      ​@@milgeekmedia there was a high powered name-blaming meeting with Galland and Goering: Goering was getting a bit testy as to why hadn't his German Eagles snuffed out old blighty yet, was there anything Galland needed to hit 'em out of the park? Gallands sarcy response was "a squadron of Spitfires". Goering was not amused, the meeting did not improve interdepartmental relations, nor did it improve the luftwaffes chances of having bitters at the White Horse pub before closing time.

  • @Mattsta2010
    @Mattsta2010 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    Sir...as a China ex-pat...your series was a thing of joy (bar a couple of errors) well done...I chortled loudly

    • @robincole1140
      @robincole1140 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I wish you luck and prosperity in whichever territory you now reside.

  • @starfish370
    @starfish370 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I totally agree with your suggestion that Trafford Leigh-Mallory was a bell end; Sir Keith Park was treated dreadfully, as was Sir Hugh Dowding 18:18

    • @SittaCarolinensis
      @SittaCarolinensis 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sholto Douglas was as bad as Leigh-Mallory

    • @kenoliver8913
      @kenoliver8913 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This was a fight for the country's existence. It is irrelevant how justly or unjustly military commanders were treated; it only matters whether the decisions they made were right. Were they?

  • @jacklucas5908
    @jacklucas5908 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    Came here from Lazerpig, stayed for the quality content!

  • @alexsmith7313
    @alexsmith7313 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    As an American who’s never heard the details of these battles beyond their dates; I simply can’t wait to see your overview style content regarding how the politics and other historical factors play into it. It’s a real blessing that I have no preconceptions to alter or have to work around.

  • @CattaroFuran
    @CattaroFuran 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Just love the commentary on your videos. I have to say as someone who has studied WWII, Churchill, for all his faults, was the man Britain and the empire needed at the time. Thank God he was there.

    • @Paciat
      @Paciat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Its sad that the empire allowed Germany to not be partitioned, to rearm and ignore French reparations. And France (that is half the size of "greater Germany") just followed with German appeasement politics scared that Britain might turn its back on France. Britain needed people like Churchill in 1918. Churchill getting power as late as 1940 is in a way shameful for Britain.

    • @russelledwards001
      @russelledwards001 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Paciat he wasn’t Jesus

    • @Paciat
      @Paciat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@russelledwards001 Yes and that was my point. Jesus would just turned the other cheek like Chamberlain did after the occupation of Ruhr.

  • @BillBailey0
    @BillBailey0 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Rally love this channel, going to binge watch everything over Easter monday 2024.

  • @robincole1140
    @robincole1140 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Very much looking forward to this series. Your channel is a hidden gem sir (although everyone's favourite pig has perhaps disturbed its camouflage a touch).

    • @robincole1140
      @robincole1140 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I should add that I am very much looking forward to many examples of Nazi nether areas being thoroughly tenderised. In these tough times, I feel we need such inspiring tales of fascist localised cauterization.

    • @alpacaofthemountain8760
      @alpacaofthemountain8760 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@robincole1140 indeed

    • @mikoto7693
      @mikoto7693 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robincole1140I know I could do with hearing a few of those tales. I have to believe that the British spirit remains strong in the face of adversity.

  • @spacecase13
    @spacecase13 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I randomly stumbled across your content a couple of days ago, and I love it, I have watched it all. Also I have watched all of Lazerpig (I love his work too) and I desperately need/ still need/ always will need more well done, well accented, smarmy nerdy history. Thank you for doing what you do!

  • @gustavogonzalez1884
    @gustavogonzalez1884 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Good sir, I may have come here due to Lazerpig, but it is your personality, wit and wealth of knowledge that keep me here! Keep doing what you’re doing!

  • @EvPev
    @EvPev ปีที่แล้ว +12

    LazerPig has some good recommendations. I've spent this week going through your backlog and I'm loving it!

  • @thedorsetflyer9113
    @thedorsetflyer9113 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Found your channel via the Blackburn Buccaneer video, and now discover that your mixture of profanity, pathos and knowledge has been directed at possible the finest chapter of British military history.
    Having grown up in Kent, I have been throughly steeped in the tales of the Battle of Britain so I am looking forward to watching the rest of the series and your take on what is an often over mythicised passage of the Second World War (cue Elgar or indeed Lark Ascending!).
    Having read a lot of the history around the battle, I can confirm that Leigh-Mallory was a complete and utter c**t, and should have been sent to the Tower for being said c**t. But as Dowding was Scottish and Park was a Kiwi, he probably thought he could get away with the grade A shithousery.
    Anyway, off to watch parts 2, 3 and 4, so jolly good show, chocks away and other such cliches that were never said… and keep up the good work, my lord.

  • @nicko2202
    @nicko2202 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Throw in as much stock footage of Hurricane gunports blazing off as you like, I'll never get bored of watching hurricanes let rip on the Luftwaffe. That's a cliche that doesn't get old.

    • @richardvernon317
      @richardvernon317 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Except its the Gun ports of a Spitfire!!!

  • @devimead750
    @devimead750 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Wow, where have you been for most of my life.
    I have just watched your video on the Me262 being rubbish, my first thoughts were that it was just another headline grabbing title, but as I had watched all that I wanted to watch, I had a look.
    Having now just watched this video, and it was just as good as the "Me262 - Why It Was Rubbish" video, I'm hooked.
    Absolutely brilliant, keep them coming.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Really glad you found it fun, that's what history should be :)

    • @arcadeians
      @arcadeians 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How? I just finished the same video and had the same opinion as I didn’t see it was yours and absolutely loved it, finished it then finally realised it was my dear Lord HardThrasher

  • @adamhayes1196
    @adamhayes1196 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Abandoned by The High Command for a night I used my unsupervised time to rewatch these (the rock and roll lifestyle...)Thoroughly enjoyed a second viewing; good work Old Chap!

  • @elgeneralissimo6322
    @elgeneralissimo6322 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Only criticism is I wish there was more of your content to enjoy! Keep up the good work, I await yoir next piece of work eagerly!

  • @OGNord
    @OGNord ปีที่แล้ว +10

    What a fantastic video! The cello guy has to be a recurring character, he’s quite the player!

  • @isaacperovic6318
    @isaacperovic6318 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Try not to limit yourself to the guy the pig shouted out. You and your content are so much more mate. Keep this up

  • @VonMed
    @VonMed 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Nimrod is such a good piece ngl, as is the battle of britain Aces high theme

  • @moon_knight8578
    @moon_knight8578 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    You and Lazerpig are national treasures

  • @christycullen2355
    @christycullen2355 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your accuracy to history and your god tier commentary have made this channel one of my favourite. The algorithm did good

  • @rudolphguarnacci197
    @rudolphguarnacci197 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Where has this channel been all my life?

  • @andrewmortimer1560
    @andrewmortimer1560 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    For what it's worth, I found Lazerpig after you, and on your recommendation. Your channel is simply brilliant. Please never stop.

  • @joshkidd5463
    @joshkidd5463 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    honestly you have one of the most refreshing channels ive watched in a while, as many have said came from lazerpig but stayed because this content is quality

  • @sabre013
    @sabre013 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Didn't find you through the pig but subscribed because of the content. Be proud of it.

  • @Vlad_-_-_
    @Vlad_-_-_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    God bless Britain and her brave men and women that stood against nazi germany !
    Love this video sir, I subscribed ( I just so happen to find your channel, but not because of the fine gentleman Lazerpig ) and I am sure to enjoy your entire brilliant content.

  • @noahm8069
    @noahm8069 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    HUZZA HUZZA A NEW UPLOAD!

  • @georgegarner-hale1388
    @georgegarner-hale1388 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Absolutely fantastic. Proper British analysis and a joy to listen to. Subbed 🤌

  • @jouhannaudjeanfrancois891
    @jouhannaudjeanfrancois891 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lazerpig and you are two sides of an excellent coin. Very happy to have you both.

  • @balaclavabob001
    @balaclavabob001 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    6:55 Churchill ignoring the officer is a whole mood . Also , why is Heinrich Himmler standing behind them ?

  • @samuelmartin865
    @samuelmartin865 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m so used to coasting through TH-cam wwii history videos on interest alone, and totally shocked to find myself literally laughing out loud at your content which is informative and an absolute RIOT to boot.

  • @doomfrom9077
    @doomfrom9077 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Excellent work Mr. Thrasher, your content is wonderful from my experience looking through it, and I feel with the increase in subscribers it's only a matter of time before you rise in our small corner of the internet for military history nerds

  • @graywolfalphaone
    @graywolfalphaone ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love you re format and approach sir. Lazzer pig may have pointed me to you but it is you re magnificence that has captured my attention. Bang on sir.

  • @tomkush3858
    @tomkush3858 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes, The Pig sent me, alas, I stay for the content. Excellent work, Sir!

  • @cookudysu90
    @cookudysu90 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hi @HardThrasher the Pig sent me lol - you forgot about operation Ariel which rescued many more British soldiers, equipment, tanks, personnel and civilians etc from many other french ports but we still left a shit load of stuff behind for the Germs. Btw I like this video and your personality 😀

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, didn't get into the detail - very roughly Ariel lifted 200,000 and Dunkirk 350,000

  • @eitanamir7918
    @eitanamir7918 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really like the delivery, it's quite easy to listen to.

  • @KerbalRocketry
    @KerbalRocketry ปีที่แล้ว +2

    came here from lazerpig, watched the B17 video and subscribed halfway through, keep up the great work!

  • @jacklambert5090
    @jacklambert5090 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Watched all your videos, they are all really good and a lot of fun to listen to. I really can't wait for part 2!

  • @bilbobagginssword3926
    @bilbobagginssword3926 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My only regret watching your videos is that I did not have you for a history professor in school. I love your no BS assessments separating stats-n-facts from the rest. Very refreshing! Carry on ole chap, cheerio pi-pip and all mate.
    Love, a plucky American 🇺🇸

  • @axeman3d
    @axeman3d ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Adolph Galland's book is particularly fun. When he's blitzing across the continent in massed, surprise attacks against stunned opponents he's jack the lad. When his shit gets pushed in over Britain and then they're pushed back and mercilessly bombed he's not quite so chipper and really has it in for people who overwhelm their opponents.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The bits where he claims both that the bombing was devastating and unstoppable but also that his pilots couldn't miss and also took the bombers out...

    • @edenbreckhouse
      @edenbreckhouse ปีที่แล้ว

      I've not read Galland's book. Presumably at some point he claims he disliked Hitler, knew nothing about the Holocaust and was only following orders anyway?

    • @eze8970
      @eze8970 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably didn't help when he lost two brothers shot down & killed, that must have brought things home to him to.

    • @marklittle8805
      @marklittle8805 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@edenbreckhousefor guys like Galland, they didn't ask a lot of questions because that may get them in a camp or answering tough questions. They all knew Hitler had it in for Jews. They didn't KNOW exactly how that manifesting itself

  • @shaun85w
    @shaun85w ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the first vid you made came up in my feed and loved it. Keep up the good work, can't go back to commercial tv

  • @wirebrushofenlightenment1545
    @wirebrushofenlightenment1545 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Splendid, splendid channel. Please keep it up! Instant subscribe from me.
    The China videos are the most concise (and I believe fairly accurate) takes on Sinopolitics thatI've seen on TH-cam so far.
    (PS - nothing wrong with Elgar - I say that even after four years of studying his music in painfully tedious piano tutorials.)

  • @bigmandrel
    @bigmandrel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Oh my! Heard all four parts. The Elgar references had me on the ground. Not a Cellist, a Bassoonist I - close enough. I think you are super funny and informative. Love your content, wit and pacing. Got here by chance.

    • @marcosalmendras4998
      @marcosalmendras4998 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Clarinetist (well a LOOONG time ago) here. can you explain or loop me into the reference?

  • @geoffreyentwistle8176
    @geoffreyentwistle8176 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    It was both chance AND the pig, in my case. XD

    • @EricDKaufman
      @EricDKaufman ปีที่แล้ว

      how the hell does that happen?

  • @jimaholic
    @jimaholic ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love how the character flashes in and out in line with the audio glitch at 5:10 😂

  • @benjaminalmquist1805
    @benjaminalmquist1805 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've been looking forward to this!

  • @PhonixTeam
    @PhonixTeam 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    saw your me262 vid and this one, endlessly entertaining. Have subbed!

  • @jonnyj.
    @jonnyj. ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is gonna be a good fucking series, lesgoo!

  • @amanullahkariapper2503
    @amanullahkariapper2503 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is probably the first time I've heard an English-speaking source speak with respect for French men-at-arms. And only the second or third time that I've come across mention of the contribution of the French rearguard action in enabling the miracle of Dunkirk. Thank you.

  • @pcka12
    @pcka12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Churchill was a 'newspaper man' as well as soldier & politician, a complex character.

    • @kenoliver8913
      @kenoliver8913 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And actually a very good writer. As he said "History will be kind to me - for I will write it." And after WW2 he did - of course leaving out his errors. A man who did many stupid things in a long career that weakened his country and got a lot of people killed, but our host is correct. He got it dead right in the 30s and early 40s.

  • @caldwellkelley3084
    @caldwellkelley3084 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Writing this 11 months after it's introduction that my father was USAF from 50's - 80's your video about the 8th AF brough me here. You knowledge filled in blanks that had existed since I was a boy sitting at the knee of the men who flew for the 8th and 15th US Air Forces. I thought that was a hard thing to do, but your introduction at the beginning of this video answered the question for I have always (and read most) of the German Glorification documents. I always found it funny that Adolf Gallant seem to be always shoot holes in the agreed upon knowledge. So I'm very intrigued at Lord HardThrasher's take.

  • @jensphiliphohmann1876
    @jensphiliphohmann1876 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    You don't like Elgar very much, do you?

  • @sandroteixeira5390
    @sandroteixeira5390 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Commenting so the algorithm likes you more. Subscribed after watching all of your content. Excellent stuff! Keep it up!

  • @iffracem
    @iffracem 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As an ex Australian soldier (21 years) , I'll never forgive Churchil for Galipoli, and much as I dislike all politicians, will always appreciate our Prime minister during WW2 (John Curtin) for keeping as much Australian forces as he could around Australia the Pacific and South East Asia against the Japanese and not used as cannon fodder in campaigns important to his Britain and Empire.
    He wasn't a saint, he wasn't the best... he was just the perfectly arrogant pig headed leader that Britain needed at that time.

    • @mikemines2931
      @mikemines2931 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who's arguing.

  • @Richard-eb3rx
    @Richard-eb3rx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Without question, love your commentary!. You certainly get the point across. Don't change a thing.

  • @Esau420
    @Esau420 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I heard your dog in the background. Say Hi to them for me!

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I know, she was unimpressed about my 'intresting' new word

    • @Esau420
      @Esau420 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HardThrasher well it really made me smile to hear a dog in another content creators video. Made me feel less bad :)

  • @roblion9900
    @roblion9900 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Glad to found this Channel, keep up the good Work.
    Greets from Germany

  • @ptonpc
    @ptonpc ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Looks like this will shape up to a good series.
    I remember reading (It was a long time ago so my source is hazy so feel free to fact check me) that in the event of the RAF losing and Germany sending an invasion force across the Channel, the Royal Navy's Home Fleet could afford to go on a death ride down the coast, through the invasion fleet. Even if it lost every single battleship, it would still have been considered a win, simply due to the sheer carnage it could accomplish.

    • @tizi087
      @tizi087 ปีที่แล้ว

      and because the germans only have 1 shot at their invasion. If that fails they cant try again

    • @edenbreckhouse
      @edenbreckhouse ปีที่แล้ว

      But then how would the Brits have combatted the U boat threat with half their fleet sunk in the straits of Dover?

    • @ptonpc
      @ptonpc ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@edenbreckhouse Battleships didn't hunt U boats and there were other fleets available, with smaller ships more suited to convoy duty coming online.

    • @meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee2
      @meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee2 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@edenbreckhouse The shallow waters of the straits of Dover are not a good place for U boats to operate, and a destroyer doing 30 knots at night is not a very good target. When considering how the Germans would fare defending an invasion against the RN, just look at how well they did trying to stop the evacuation from Dunkirk.

    • @meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee2
      @meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee2 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ptonpc Although it was an airstrike from HMS Warspite that achieved the first sinking of a U boat from the air.
      Imagine being dived bombed by a Swordfish float plane by the time it got low enough to drop its bomb, most of the U Boat crew had probably had a mental breakdown brought on by long term stress.

  • @lotneg
    @lotneg ปีที่แล้ว +2

    genuinely fantastic to listen to while i do work, thank you good sir.

  • @LotharTheFellhanded
    @LotharTheFellhanded ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Appreciate the call out for French. WW2 was won with Soviet blood, and WW1 was won with French blood.

    • @anzaca1
      @anzaca1 ปีที่แล้ว

      WW2 was won with everyone's blood.

    • @mickmegson6241
      @mickmegson6241 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes, those over 1 million British casualties of WW1 didn't bleed at all.

    • @LotharTheFellhanded
      @LotharTheFellhanded ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@mickmegson6241 The French suffered 6 million casualties. Their sacrifice was literally x6 greater, not to mention the damage to their economy and land because the war was fought on their soil. So yes, the British contributed greatly but the French contributed six times more.

    • @mickmegson6241
      @mickmegson6241 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Wars aren't won by suffering the highest casualties, it would be a truer statement to say the war was almost lost by French blood. The sheer crass stupidity of the French command, notably in the border battles of 1914, was disastrous for France. Those brave men killed in 1914, the bloodiest campaign of the war for France, died for no benefit to the national war effort. Simplistic statements like yours show an lack of understanding of how wars are actually fought and won.

    • @user-mg3xr9tz7m
      @user-mg3xr9tz7m ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mickmegson6241yeah right the incompetence and lack of effectiveness of the British army is undeniable on WW1. You excelled at lying to the US since you owned the only communication cable at the time though so that they would intervene to save your asses and die for you. WW2 was even worse. You did not manage to win a single battle for yourselves

  • @saltefan5925
    @saltefan5925 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lazerpig might have shown me the way here, but much I wouldn't stay if I didn't enjoy what he led me to. I have already watched all of your videos (some more than once) and am really happy to see more!

  • @freedompodcast4518
    @freedompodcast4518 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I am Welsh I still find that joke funny. 9:54.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Little secret - my family were from Pembrokeshire

  • @adder3597
    @adder3597 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This looks like it's going to be a very VERY good series to watch ❤
    See you when it lands, Admiral

  • @MartynWilkinson45
    @MartynWilkinson45 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Worth remembering that a fair chunk of the polish navy and airforce escaped and signed up with the British. One of my local airfields was staffed almost entirely by poles for most of the war. Not just pilots, they loaded the planes with groundcrew and familys and took off. An old boy I remmber from my childhood claimed to have been tied into a bomb rack - no idea how much of that is hyperbole, but there you go.

    • @voja42
      @voja42 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Czechoslovaks too, in Battle of Britain there was one whole czechoslovak squadron (no. 310) and by the end of the war there were four (310-313)

    • @joshuamcisaac1832
      @joshuamcisaac1832 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Wasnt there a british destroyer manned by Polish sailors that bum-rushed the Bismark?

    • @redenginer2234
      @redenginer2234 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@joshuamcisaac1832 yeah ORP Piorun

  • @Blader445
    @Blader445 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You remind me of one of my other favorite british historians/military history youtubers: The Mighty Jingles.
    I’ve already burned through your content. I look forward to whatever else you put out.

  • @f4eL5K
    @f4eL5K ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Viemos pela indicação mas fiquei pela qualidade

  • @donatoferioli7426
    @donatoferioli7426 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The pig sent me.

  • @Kalevdraus
    @Kalevdraus ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh lovely, so glad this channel was recommended

  • @Heard40k
    @Heard40k ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I admit, It was The Pig.

  • @kaboulscabal4816
    @kaboulscabal4816 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm here because of a random Algy recommendation (well, that was 3 of your videos ago, so not technically *right* now), not no LazerPig.
    Your videos are great, keep 'em coming.

  • @zestoslife
    @zestoslife ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In the 5-6 minute mark the comment about how an undefeated UK meant that the UK could rely on the US industrial might that doomed the Nazi's sounds plausable. However this does assume that the submarine fleet couldn't blockage the island.
    Which for a while this blockage seemed like it was going to work. And if it had, the outcome would have been UK defeat.
    So yes the nazi airforce defeat (can't spell luf-athingy) was a strategic failure, but could have been a different outcome.

  • @adamelliott2302
    @adamelliott2302 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fine content! I'm here recently because of LP's recommend. Keep it up!

  • @siv5122
    @siv5122 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey, just found this channel, just want to give some encouragement. Your content is absolutely awesome, keep it up!

  • @tomekjar
    @tomekjar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It might be true that a certain pig has sent me your way, but it is your content that made me stay and subscribe. Hats off good man, carry on!

  • @andrewgause6971
    @andrewgause6971 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I recall the Pig mentioning you, but to my shame, I forgot to swing by until the algorithm passed along your buccaneer video. Love the content so far, sir!
    As to the battle of Britain itself, for what it was worth, I grew up reading a journalist book on the battle of britain, that covered everything from channel convoys to interviews with the Eagle Squadron or whatever they were called (the American volunteer group) and Polish resistance airmen. Near the conclusion of the book, there was a talk with a RAF high commander (I forget his name, as I sadly lost the book in Hurricane Michael and it was a very, very old book, older even than my father), where he was explaining the RAF's approach. Namely, that the goal was, wherever possible, to destroy about 10% of the attacking luftwaffe planes. With the strategic goal being "If we can destroy ten percent every time, in time, we will destroy the entire airforce." It was portrayed, not as a plucky few standing up and winning by a stiff upper lip and jolly-good spirit, but a cold, calculating battle of attrition... rather conveniently also helped by the decision of the luftwaffe to fly their ace pilots until they died so they would have more kills for the propaganda department, rather than doing the sensible thing and turning them into trainers for the next wave of pilots to help grow the overall quality of the air force as a whole...
    Make of that what you will.

  • @recognizingfrequency2906
    @recognizingfrequency2906 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No Elgar? Damn. Perhaps some Samuel Barber. Keep up the good work!

  • @timothyhopper4956
    @timothyhopper4956 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lazerpig recommended several channels; yours is the only one I stuck with for more than half a video.

  • @robertricketts5467
    @robertricketts5467 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You're a treasure Mate! Please keep doin' what you're doin'.Thanks.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Much appreciated

  • @alexsocial9525
    @alexsocial9525 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the pig with the funky shooty eyes for sponsoring you! i never knew about this level of infighting within the nazi army before watching this series! They really did not have a clue of what to do to conquer great britain... just improvised 🤨 completely worth the video and subscribed!👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @JamesSmith-tr2tp
    @JamesSmith-tr2tp ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mate I’ve just discovered you on TH-cam please keep it coming 🤙😂 great content

  • @michaeltroster9059
    @michaeltroster9059 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As a WWII history buff, I may be so bold as to suggest that you redo the entire history of said conflict in your inimitable style. Your style is far more amusing and probably accurate than much of the BS produced by the “ experts”. Carry on.

  • @dennisweidner288
    @dennisweidner288 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good nuanced assessment of Churchill

  • @Hulkenburger
    @Hulkenburger ปีที่แล้ว

    Lazerpig had 10 or so recommended channels, you and the pig racing were the only ones that interested me enough to subscribe to.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean Piggie Smalls - what's not to like

  • @jimnicholas7334
    @jimnicholas7334 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let's go! Your perspective is rather unique for me and and I'm waiting on the edge of my seat to see more!

  • @naenaemister5048
    @naenaemister5048 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    two things one the mg42 is very good gun considering it’s still used today and didn’t even know you and laser pig were friends man love your content keep it up

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If I was stationary, waiting to ambush to bad guys, and I had infinite ammo, and lots of barrels, and the state I was serving had near infinite resources then the MG42 is hard to beat. However. If I need an infantry support weapon that needs to move around, or am operating in a war time with near peers and don't have those things then it's bloody awful. Hence no one else has ever thought that weight of fire was a good idea, and all the modern versions use much easier to manufacture parts.

  • @dmnorthwind9584
    @dmnorthwind9584 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Came from the pig, stayed for the content.
    I am perhaps unreasonably excited for this series, just from the promise of giving Leigh-Mallory what for. I did note one minor error, the OKW was the overall military command, while the OKH was Army High Command.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know, I know, total brain fart

  • @LittlePinkBowser
    @LittlePinkBowser ปีที่แล้ว

    Honestly, glad he “referred” me to you, you definitely deserve the promotion

  • @ScrumbynPlumbo
    @ScrumbynPlumbo ปีที่แล้ว

    After getting this channel recommended by a well known pig I decided to check out the channel before I actually subscribed to them. I went to your first video and saw it was trashing the B-17. Now I am a bit of a freedomboo but I swallowed my pride and watch it anyway. After I finished it I immediately subscribed to you because if your first video was that good, your newer ones should be even better, and I was glad to be proven right. In particular I want to say how amazing your China video series is and I’m almost done watching through your backlog.

  • @joshuamcisaac1832
    @joshuamcisaac1832 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lazer sent us your way, but we stay around cause your stuffs good and enjoyable to watch

  • @nickbarton6022
    @nickbarton6022 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bloody great start! Can’t wait for the next few. Take your time though, don’t whatever you do piss off her ladyship. And yes, Liverpool is indeed a sodding marvellous place…for the most part…especially now it’s not the 1980s…anyway I digress. Brilliant video and looking forward to more, mostly Elgar-free, stuff.

  • @doggonemess1
    @doggonemess1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I actually found your channel because for once, TH-cam actually recommended it based on my viewing habits. Shocking, I know. But I am a Lazerpig fan, so it makes sense.

    • @HardThrasher
      @HardThrasher  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The algorythim has to work at least sometimes I guess :)

    • @sealioso
      @sealioso ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @todayshorse
      @todayshorse ปีที่แล้ว

      Had never heard of lazerpig, but have had a gander at his stuff. Think the pesky algorithm suggested this BoB series to me. Good stuff, I've listened to it a few times now.

  • @timothyhayes9724
    @timothyhayes9724 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dammit I've binged your entire library and now I need to wait for me. Thank you for the great content! And thank you LP for the recommendation

  • @cueball6969
    @cueball6969 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was already subbed to the pig but I had not heard of your channel, until by chance I stumbled upon the EE Lightning video
    I had subscribed within 5 minutes I found that video so good