ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ต.ค. 2008
- www.ted.com In this engrossing EG talk, architect Liz Diller shares her firm DS+R's more unusual work, including the Blur Building, whose walls are made of fog, and the revamped Alice Tully Hall, which is wrapped in glowing wooden skin.
- แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต
![[#SHORTS CLIP] ครูอึ้ง กรรมการอึ้ง ฮ่าๆ l ซานิเบาได้เบา l One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qeBTuMJs4t0/mqdefault.jpg)
Que genia!! Y ahora pensándolo es divertido imaginar que en Lima en invierno de por si vivimos, respiramos y bebemos agua 💧por tanta humedad
Considering how architecture is a sequential sensorial experience taking place in space, the Blur Building is an environment of designated limits. Liz talks about it being "formless, featureless, depthless, scaleless, massless, surfaceness and dimensionless." Although many of the references are removed, the Blur still gives visitors a controlled (delimited) experience through visual, audio and tactile sensors. Who knows? She may have been inspired by a boat cruise to the base of Niagara Falls, where a person would encounter similar conditions. And would also need a raincoat.
Maybe your just trying to say that the meaning cannot be found through "language" atleast none we know of, but that does not mean that it has no meaning, if it has purpose it must also have some "meaning" attributed to it.
Perhaps you believe that I have used an argument of Circular Reasoning and I see where you might find that, However, I have simply used a Hypothetical Syllogism to prove that the point is valid.
Again, nice.
Is it Cristmas already?
If a word has a definition it must have a meaning Sir.
It must then be taken that meaningless noise, cannot be meaningless.
Especially not taking into account perspective/knowledge and such.
You believe that her noises have no meaning, BUT they do.. they help her process information, THAT in and of itself is enough to make it meaningful.
Buena Pablo un *pollito* o que?
I expected something cutting-edge and impressive. Instead, I got a bunch of gibberish from a self-important speaker who's forgotten how to comb her hair.
"meaningless noises"? wtf Read some Pinker. Its a subroutine to keep thoughts going,like couplings between traincars.
Equivalencies are not logical fallacies, if i tell you that 1 + 1 = 2 you won't argue that point right? You would accept that 1 + 1 is in fact 2, not because i said it but because it is true.
Yes i understand where you are comming from on this, she should not use words like "um" and "yeah" because they convey no meaning to US.
Someone, somewhere could hear her "umm's" and "yeahs" and find some value in them, others apparently have, and by that alone it has meaning.
I think the "fallacy" that your talking about would be more of "circular reasoning" than a fallacy of "equivalence"
is there such a thing as a fallacy of equivalence? because as long as I have been in school I have encountered no such thing... perhaps if you could explain where this fallacy is i might be able to either find a better argument for the point im making, or dare i say... accept the point your trying to make?
You are mixing up two things "conflating the issue." Meaningless noises are meaningless because, by definition, they convey no meaning.
I didn't say they didn't help the lady think, I said she shouldn't be muttering nonsensical words in the middle of her sentences because it sounds bad. I understand why she is doing it, and I understand that she should just pause.
Non-fluencies are a big public speaking "no no" she should just pause, not try to fill the air with meaningless noises.
You are conflating the issue, again, and using an equivalency (logical fallacy). "If something is meaningless it has a definition, and an equivalent word for definition is meaning, so meaningless things have meaning." It seems logical but it's not, as you can see in this example.
Again, I said her words, "um, ah, yadda yadda" carry no meaning, I understand they are useful to her, and I understand they sound bad so she shouldn't use them.