The Old Debate on Greed in the NHL, Owners vs Players
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024
- EWe are going to hear about how greedy players are on July 1st yet again, but I wanted to provide historical context to the argument.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @thehockeyguy
Join us on our discord to chat hockey, talk with others during the game, share pet pictures, and more.
/ discord
Order jerseys from Ben H Sports while saving 10% off the listed eBay prices by sending him an email regarding jerseys you spot in his listings. ben.hoogenband@yahoo.ca Just tell him Shannon sent you.
Support The Hockey Guy via Patreon / thehockeyguy
/ youtubehockeyguy
Instagram: thgshannon and thg_cats
Spoutible: spoutible.com/...
TheHockeyGuy.yt@gmail.com
Contact me via snail mail at:
The Hockey Guy
PO Box 15038 Seven Oaks PO
Abbotsford, BC
V2S 8P1
In the USA:
Shannon Skanes
1125 Fir Avenue
Suite 119
Blaine, WA 98230
I don't fault the players for seeking as much money as possible, I just don't want my team to have a bunch of bad contracts they can't move while preventing the team from being able to sign legitimate assets.
Yep. I don't fault OEL for getting $8 million a season. I'm upset at the Canucks owner for forcing a trade to get him. ... Although to be fair for all involved, OEL wasn't bad his first season here and if it weren't for that foot injury, the Canucks would likely have won several more games. (He's On Ice Goal differential was just shy of 20 worse than expected. The only Canucks player even close to that was Myers at -18.)
Jesus Christ! I knew those two had rough seasons, but this is the first time I looked at those numbers. And the Canucks were paying them a combined $13 million. Ouch. I don't blame the players for getting paid. I just wish they were being paid that much by a team I don't cheer for.
That what a proper GM is for there bub
The salary cap makes it relatively easy to judge GMs in this sense because everyone has the same budget and it's a hard ceiling. So the question is, it is wise to spend X% of the team's budget on Player Y? In the days before salary caps became a thing, it was much easier to criticize ownership/management for being cheapskates for not spending top dollar to sign or re-sign big-name players, because it was easy to assume that if you were rich enough to buy a sports team, you had a bottomless pool of money and could spend endlessly on salaries.
I'd never understand the fans backing the owners. When this is still at its core a labor issue. I'll always support the players getting their worth.
I think it's because fans get to see how players' salary affects the on-ice performance, while owners diving from their luxury yachts to swim in a pool of money isn't as visible.
You have to be a scrooge like Harold Ballard for fans to even notice/ get outraged.
Also maybe yknow some older fans get a bit jealous seeing young kids make more in a year than most of us in an entire lifetime.
@@stevendchu what were Ballard's habits like?
Most people are stupid.
@@stevendchu I'd say it has more to do with people being fans of teams moreso than fans of players. It makes sense, players are way more transitory on a team through the years. There are players I really like, but if they aren't on my favorite team I don't want them to win at the expense of my team.
It was the owners who gave us hockey during the pandemic and took all of the financial risk (and loss) during the bubble and during the 2021 season. And the players were the ones who had the gall to bitch about escrow. The only reason why we had hockey to watch was because of the owners, and I don’t forget that.
The players ARE THE PRODUCT, can’t hate them for wanting to be paid as much as they
I'm 100% a union man, but I think the salary cap and revenue sharing is good for both the players and the owners. If there were a lockout / strike on the horizon, I would have to look at the issues being raised by both sides, but barring something strange, I would be supporting the players.
On the other hand, I HATE the NHLPA when they fight to get suspensions reduced. Get rid of the dirty players. Don't support them. Remember, the injured player is also part of the NHLPA.
..there is an old pic of Tim Horton sitting in a pick up truck, with Conn Smythe standing beside the truck. Horton had to work at Smythe's gravel pits in the summer, to make extra cash...
I would like to see a video on the prices around the league for a family of four ,snack parking ,drinks included video from you,anyone else with me?
Hell yes!
@@leatherbound4233absolutely
A little more credit to the WHA. Not only are they responsible for players getting paid better, but they forced the NHL to expand into markets that they probably wouldn't have without competition. Without the WHA, I'm pretty sure teams like the Canucks, Sabres & Islanders wouldn't exist, and the only teams in Canada would be Montreal and Toronto, since those two franchises were against sharing their tv money with anyone else.
It's almost like the whole purpose of the WHA was to force the NHL to expand faster, pay their players better, and add more Canadian teams to that league, since the WHA was adamant that all three Canadian teams in the WHA be added to the NHL.
Pretty sure WHA helped with the NHL getting the draft age lowered to 18. I wouldn't doubt it would've gone down to 18 eventually anyway. but i'm sure the WHA attempting to pluck the talent by having a lower draft age expedited the process
I did not know that NHL players were not unionized until 1967, wow that’s crazy! Thanks, Shannon
Said this back in 94÷95...When an Owner says" I'm Losing Money" it's NOT that they are NEGATIVE Cash Wise, it's that they Aren't gonna Make as Much Money as they POSSIBLY COULD! If WE Had A $20 Bill in our pockets and it fell out-we LOST that $20...So we Now have No Money! When Owners-FEEL they COULD'VE Mad $100, But ONLY Made $80- So they LOST $20!! Different Perspective! ;-)
@Reed Miller Not Totally Accurat...Incidentally , I was A COYOTE Season Ticket Holder 96-04 and Are FULLY AWARE of the Ownership History of the 'YOTES! I'm still in AZ.
Happy Father's Day Shannon.
I think last year's lockout in major league baseball has been interesting in terms of looking at who the fans supported. In 1994 I think most fans sided with the owners, but judging from reactions I saw online, it seemed most people really supported the players this time around. I think this is a good trend, and hopefully the NHLPA benefits from it next time they have labor struggles
Side note, but my favorite thing that came out of last year's lockout was a tweet from Jon Bois that basically said "I actually go to the game for the owners. The players I could give or take. If I paid for a game and all I saw was a baseball sitting on the mound, I would be satisfied." If that doesn't show the ridiculousness of siding with the owners in a labor struggle, idk what would
We are conditioned to believe that individual wealth is bad, but corporate wealth and especially corporate welfare is ok.
Thats what millions in advertising can do.
As a guy that played 5 years of organized hockey and played on streets and gyms and roller rinks both 4 wheel and inline I am going to say.....Professional hockey Players are easily the most under payed(All 4 North american pro sports) for the amount of Brutal Punishment they experience. No Amount of money is worth the suffering they do in their later years IMHO.
Disagree. There is no guaranteed money in 90% of cases in the NFL. Guys get hurt and immediately cut all the time.
The NHL is also the least watched sport of the four major North American sport leagues. So, it make sense that they don't make the same amount of money. There is also far more wage parity in the NHL than other leagues like football due to the cap.
The answer is simple: They're all greedy. The players, the owners, the league, even the fans. Just part of being human.
Greed is a Sin.
If more people could acknowledge this reality, we'd have a basis for proceeding. Too many like to pretend it's everyone else's problem...
good ol human nature argument that always explains everything regardless of what is
Sure, so the word should be reserved for those who are exceptionally greedy.
People are greedy because societal structures awards greed, not humna nature
People saying hockey players aren't doctors....Let me ask you this :
Do you want Owner getting the most cash or the players? Who's giving the show?
Better have players getting most of the cash...The logic that if players are paid less,ticket will be cheaper is complete nonsense.
I feel players should be paid more considering how much skill and talent to play hockey well and how much mlb nfl players get paid especially on how little games nfl players play. That being said that also reflects how much money is bring brought in. Nhl needs to do better especially in streaming services since the ones available are garbage.
From a players POV: you've spent your entire life dedicated to hockey. Your parents have prob alr spent a ton of money to get you where you are today. You have a limited professional window. You (prob) don't have a degree/diploma that will give you career opportunites after retirement. Not everybody can be Biznasty, media opportunities are limited.
Why wouldn't you get as much as you possibly can? 78% of pro athletes face financial issues after they retire. Taking a team friendly deal to win a Cup might be nice at the end of your career, but pawning off rings so you can afford child support isn't.
The NHL is the one league where a salary cap isn't for the betterment, as far as I'm concerned. What really sticks out are the artificial factors that are added to artificial markets. We've seen a league that has clearly been in decline since 2005-06. You could argue the decline had already begun on February 1st of 1993. Certainly, the league didn't benefit from "the trap era".
Normally I agree with you but this is one of those cases that you gave one of the most one-sided arguments I have ever heard. I completely agree that the NHL needed a players union and that there was a time when players were treated not just unfairly but criminally (hence Alan Eagelson going to jail). But to completely deny the state of the game going into the 2004-2005 lockout is just negligent reporting. Prior to the cap you basically had small market teams acting as free-agent feeders for high-salary teams with no hope of being able to keep their players. Teams like the Red Wings and Rangers had payrolls of over 75 million while Nashville was at 22 million and several others under 30 million. The NHL needed a salary cap and they needed a cap that guaranteed that all teams were capable of surviving and being competitive.
Not all the owners were billionaires, just look at Edmonton. They were within hours of becoming the third Canadian team to head to the US except the Alberta Treasury Branch put a price matching clause on the loans Pocklington secured with the Oilers as collateral and 37 individuals stepped up and pooled their money and bought the team at the sale deadline. I'll never forget looking at an article written about Denver professional sports teams pointing out that both Joe Sakic and Peter Forsberg made more money than John Elway even though the NHL revenue was not even close to that of the NFL. The pendulum had swung too far and a correction was needed.
These high-value NHL franchises we see today are because they have a salary cap in place.
Due to the average NHL salary cap per team. Players can't really even afford to be too greedy. Unlike in Baseball, Football and Basketball where the cap is easily over 100 mill or more. While I believe the average NHL cap room per team is around 83 million or lower. Paying 20 professional athlete's with a cap around 80 million dollars is rough. That's not including the coaching staff and other type of staff members.
@@Reedjohnmiller It's pretty much an example of how low the overall NHL teams budget is, compared to the rest of sports. That's what I meant for that part.
So if you add everything together, team/staff/coaching/scouts etc. It still doesn't even come close to the what a team in the NBA like the Charlotte Hornets have as just a team cap. Awful team, doesn't really draw a ton of fans and still has a team cap of 123.6 million dollars. So my point is the owner in the NHL have an overwhelming advantage over the players in the NHL, compared to say basketball and football where players have more leverage in there sport over the owners and how much money they can ask/demand for more. Player in the NHL asks for over 10 million per season. That's about 8.3 percent of the teams cap which heavily affects them overtime. (Using the Rangers 83 million as an example for this.)
At the risk of bringing politics into it- during the 2012 lockout, the NHL hired noted pollster Frank Luntz (creator of the term “death tax”) to do spin for the owners. That tells me all I need to know. The owners and Bettman have gotten everything they wanted but it is never enough.
I always stick with labor.
I think this situation between fans not taking the side of athletes is very similar to how college football and basketball players were viewed before NIL. (The owners and NCAA knew/know this) but it's very hard for your average Joe to feel sympathy for multi-millionaire athletes or student-athletes (who get treated like gods on campus and get scholarships) and view them as fellow labour.
imma side with owners. 2020 says it all your playing a children's game in empty areas during a pandemic where people are losing their livelihoods. these piss ants want full contracts ya no fuck the high paid cry babies.
That squeaky "Welcome back" cracked me up. Another nice vid THG.
On July 3rd, ESPN will opt out of the remaining 5 years of a 7-year contract to hold the first half of the NHL’s media rights and sell the remainder of the contract to CBS Sports.
I never understood why people want the CAP to go up. Your team isn't getting better players, they'll just pay more to the same ones. And many teams already spent a good chunk of the increase even before it goes up by signing bigger contracts, "because the CAP is going up, so we'll be OK".
And more important, YOU'RE PAYING FOR IT. Why would you like to pay more for the same product? The money comes out of you.
Plus, for every million the CAP increases, another one goes to the owners pockets. Why would you help billioners get wealthier at your expense?
Hockey was so much more violent in the 30-50s ... imagine getting your head cracked for 30-50k a year.
Another excellent video Shannon. I believe the reason you have a salary cap in the NHL is to keep teams like the Rangers, Detroit, Philly and a few others from "Pacmanning" all of the good players up. That is why a Canadien team hasn't won the cup in over 30 years. No big free agent wants to play there because of the Canadien dollar. I remember The Flyers in 2006 were pretty bad and I talked to an employee of the franchise who was in management and he said, "Don't worry about us, meaning the Flyers, being bad this year because next year we will be great. So that offseason they went and signed Daniel Briere, Marty Biron and I believe Chris Pronger. A couple years later they are in the Stanley Cup finals. Just an example of what I meant by "Pac manning" players.
Still sad a team lost a Cup in the 04-05 lockout. I remember Roenick saying potentially a 26 or 28 game abbreviated season or something. Then nothing happened, still a bummer to this day.
Dont blame players for wanting more. They know the owners are making 100 million at least a year. The players are putting their bodies on the line and if they get badly hurt on a short team friendly contract then just too bad youre out of the job.
I know this players are greedy propaganda is insane
@@TheMercyTrials damn that’s crazy I simply don’t go to the games and just watch on TV east
I love all those guys saying that they would volunteer to do their job for free, like they could feed their families on good vibes.
like you need 9 million to play a children's game.
@@michaelbecker2435 No players no league. Simple as that.
@@michaelbecker2435 Why don't you play in the NHL then?
I'll answer both simply no owners no league. you can find players. 1980 us hockey team proved that, hell echl proves that. honestly I don't play children's games anymore. sadly some of us actually grew up and got real jobs. have a good night boys.
@@michaelbecker2435 Calling hockey a children's game via TH-cam comment is the epitome of maturity bud 🤡🤡
I liked the no cap period. The Red Wings were spenders and signed Brett Hull, when the other owners refused to do it. Nobody tried to sign Hull. When the Red Wings did sign him, the Wings were made out to be the bad guys. So they legalized the salary cap. Cheap owners got to make more money.
That's the only way the Wings could have won anything. Buying their way to a cup. Hull was past his prime at that stage. No way that era happens again.
@@youngandfree93 They won cups before they signed Hull. They won cups after Hull was with Red Wings.
With the exception of one job. Every job I’ve had tried to make me feel guilty about wanting a fair wage. Never believe the owners when they say their trying to make things fair for everyone. It’s the oldest trick in the book.
I have seen Networth. A fantastic movie & very eye-opening. It's one of my top-5 fave hockey movies.
Blame it all on the original six! The Bruins, Black Hawks, Red Wings, the Canadians, the Rangers & the Maple Leafs did it all!
yeah why i feel we are just playing catch up with the other 3 major leagues
American workers for the past 50 years have slowly become less unionized as a whole, so much so that the idea of a union outside of blue collar work is seemingly laughable. Many people don't know what work is like with a union or know anyone that is in a union. Americans have lost so much buying power but we think that paying union fees in exchange for a higher standard of living is dumb. I will will support unions in most cases; the business/franchises will make plenty of money, just less on the margins.
The age old management / labour struggle. Always follows the same pattern.
Yep its happening outside of Sports with the current WGA Strike
I agree 100%. The owners have always been greedy. Praise and Suter signing. The team offered that money on day one and they took it like any smart man. 4 months later the owner is claiming they can’t keep the lights on with these contracts. What?! You offered the money to get the top to FAs and now you want to roll back that deal. That’s crap.
feel like big 4 franchises just be going up like real estate, like your teams never getting relegated, the sports only gonna grow and the product is so protected from any kind of competition
They earn more money than they could spend in several lifetimes, zero sympathy for the players today. 50/50 split is a beautiful thing and hats of to all involved to making that happen.
Just remember, every time you hear the phrase "Better for the league." grab your wallet. As a fan my ideal scenario is lousy TV ratings and half empty buildings. Anything that hurts the ability of teams to jack up prices. I've never understood why regular fans care about whether or not the NHL has a big pop culture presence in the US. More people watching makes it more expensive for us all.
You know that would kill player salaries, right?
Your ideal scenario also means teams folding and good players going off to Europe and other pro leagues
Two thoughts on this matter, and it applies to all pro leagues, not just the NHL:
First, it became impossible for me to criticize players for maximizing their earnings once I realized how short the average career is. These guys have a very short window in which they can make 6-7 figures/year for playing hockey; even if you avoid catastrophic injury, aging or wear and tear can take away just enough edge to cost you your job. It's not comparable to professions and trades where you can have an uneventful decades-long career earning decent money year in and year out. So I don't blame players for wanting to make the most out of the opportunity while they have it.
At the same, age and experience have also taught me that people who have never owned/run a business tend to underestimate their fragility. Even with professional sports franchises, I reject the notion that they can be careless with money, and that the guys in the board rooms are all lighting up expensive cigars with C-notes. Having run a small business myself, I understand needing to maximize your opportunities to make a profit, because you never truly know how long it will last. I also understand that if you don't keep an eye on your costs (including labor) things can go south on you, and very quickly. It's not as easy as it looks from the outside. You can have a lot of money coming in, but you always need to make sure that amount is more than what's going back out.
I was really expecting a Bettman call at the end of this one :)
Most redicolous thing is that the owners blame the players for the COVID-19 shutdown 2019-2020 season… and for some mystical reason the revenue lost is players fault and now players are on depth for the owners, because the COVID-19 happened.
No, the league lost over a billion dollars so the players owe half. They can't get half the revenue and not assume half the losses.
@@TheHockeyGuy the owners didnt lose any money. they just didnt make a billion dollars that year. they used PPP to cover any potential loses.
So the salary cap didn't drop. You understand this right? The league made less, but the players didn't. That's why they owe money.
Curious why people ignore the mlb , nba and others when calling nhl players who make a lot lot less. And most of us agree play a lot harder game
You are talking nonsense. Everyone criticizes every athlete during a work stoppage.
I think George Carlin's "Fuck the fans" rant in Bird Droppings had it right. Only the players matter in any sport. We can all disappear and what's left: the players. They are going to play their game in their local rinks, courts, fields, whatever. Fans absolutely don't matter, the owners don't matter. I'm always on the player's side in these disputes.
Fans don’t matter? Lol. These players are out of a job with no fans. Your statement is not very logical.
One problem is a lot of people don’t understand how much more a billion is to a million.
Look at it this way. Here you are, a fan, seeing some millionaire sports player get paid 4 million a year to play a game while you make peanuts laying concrete. Players come off as entitled children.
i support the PLAYERS 100%
The salary cap and with it, a cap floor, are overall, good things for sports. See the gongshow that is the MLB right now. You have 5 MLB teams that have payrolls BELOW the NHL cap floor. The Lightning's payroll is higher than the Rays. You have the Mets who are spending 10x what the Athletics are spending on players. I'm still surprised the MLB didn't have a full season lockout to fight for a salary cap/floor. It's the main reason why the MLB is such a poor product to watch.
2:52 The Red Wings shot themselves in the foot too throwing *Glenn Hall* in that trade. Detroit doesn't win a Stanley Cup for 40 years and Mr. Goalie is only the best in the league for the next 15 years
Well said as always
I have no problem with players holding out for their worth, I just don't want the management of teams I cheer for to give market value contracts to any players, because that's a big part of winning unfortunately.
I'd love for the cap to be removed. I'd personally support a boycott to that effect. Some people think capitalism has already had its day, and they might be right, or they might be wrong.
There are two huge issues here. Number one, is that the sports agents involved here are the same agents working for companies that manage baseball, basketball, football, and players in the likes of the Premiership, and other European football leagues. Let's look at golf, racing, especially Formula 1, and you see the kind of money that is coming into the few huge companies that do this.
With the salary cap, the NHL are on the lower end of the pay scale, and even though an arena holds far fewer people than say an NFL stadium, the NHL play forty-one home games a year...the owners are making money, but so are the agents, and they really do not work that hard.
The second point is this. We have seen many players in the NHL that had promising careers in other sports, and we also know about the players in other sports that could have played NHL but didn't, why? The NHL is brutal on the body, it can take most of the year with training camp, regular season, playoffs, draft etc., why wouldn't you play baseball? Being on the road, young, easier on the body, playing in the summer, Christmas off, winter off, way more money than an NHL'er. NHL guys are just trying to keep up, but so are their agents...they are the real greedy scum in this.
Nobody buys a ticket to see an owner. The players, if well organized, could own their league, hire their own administrative staff, and cut out the leaches.
hmmm food and rent for a month or going to a nhl game ,thats a dificult desision
Really it does not matter i have not been able to afford a ticket since the 1980s any way,not to mention the consessiion and parking fees .The league is now supported by the rich and company tickets
It’s all exorbitant salaries. People are making millions to play a game whilst teachers are living on the bread line
This video is on point ❤🔥
Bill Veeck suggested a salary cap and revenue sharing in the 1950s in MLB. He was trashed by the other AL owners.
Owners did not just (for the most part) enter the world with a silver spoon in their mouths. They bear the risk of doing business.
The owners did take a hit during Covid and it was a lot.
Then, the comnents are the same. "I hate the salary cap." "Bettman sux." "Too many teams." "Bettman hates Canadian teams."
If it was not for the cap, there would be about 8 to 12 teams and none in Canada aside from Montreal and Toronto, but, hey, everybody has to point fingers at somebody.
The system in place works. It does not work perfectly, but it works. It works better that the pre salary cap days and it works better than the days before 1967.
I would be careful lumping all owners together in one greedy bunch. Mario Lemieux ended up with the Penguins because Baldwin did not have the money to pay him.
I want critics of the salary cap to ask Mario what he thought of it.
might help players / union to help reduce salary cap hits through trades and other ways
I personally have never liked unions. Makes it difficult to keep good employees when all the shitty ones get equal treatment even if they're doing a fraction of the work. Then you can't fire them because their so protected. Good workers typically don't like unions and those who just coast through work doing bare minimum love them.
players / union could look into that salary cap increases do not overly raise ticket prices
keeping down ticket prices would help owners and players, as well as obvious benefit to fans
I'll never side against the players when it comes to this argument, for the same reason I'll never side against the concession staff or the janitorial staff. Labor deserves the entire cake, and players are still laborers, they're just the labourers who are compensated closest to what they're actually worth.
Careers of doctors can be much longer as they rarely get cross checked by three hundred pounds of athlete traveling at high speeds.
Whatever the players are making the owners are making triple. They only have so long to make the money so I won't knock them for trying to get as much as they can while they are healthy.
It's rich owners, rich players, and everyone else. Most people don't mind seeing players in any sport making big bucks as their career is over within 20 years, but they're still young when they retire/quit and can still make money in other ways for decades. My favourite football player made good money while playing retired at 34 due to injury, coached a bit and worked in the energy sector for three decades.
Every jersey ad and board ad they bring in is to make owners richer + pay for arizona.
Both are greedy and us middle class fans pay for it
I see it as pretty level from both. It is destroying the game and I'll say it AGAIN ADDS! We have more on uniforms and the playing surface than all the other top sports COMBINED! Tired of both, the cost of taking your kid to a game you need to take out a loan and still only get cheep seats. Who isn't tired of seeing a player sign a huge contract for a ridiculous amount and watching them phone it in. I'm all for fair pay and all but we're being bled dry.
To clarify something...50% of the revenue goes to the owners, who then need to go pay everyone on the staff including people like Mary in accounts payable, Bob in accounts receivable, Tony in facilities and all of the trainers, scouts, managers and HR, plus the general business overhead like rent/lease agreements, payroll taxes and insurance, legal, and general employee benefits, etc. Just like in any other business, that all gets paid out of the owners' share. The players don't have to pay out any of that, except paying their agents.
🥾👅
That greed
I think the lack of a strong union historically has a lot to do with the fact that the league is predominately Canadian and Canadians historically and culturally don't have as violent of a labour union history as say the United States. Yes, you had the Winnipeg General Strike and the Regina Riot but in the States you have countless mining towns from West Virginia to Colorado where there have literally been massacres (i.e. people shot and killed) to break up strikes and other riots like in places Chicago due to racial tensions around the hiring of immigrant and/or African-Americans. What's crazy now is because of the success of a labour party, the New Democratic Party (NDP) in Canada is that Canadians have much stronger labour protections (aroundminimum wage, universal healthcare, etc.) then their American counterparts because of the prescence of an actual labour party in government lol
Totally agree
Like Dana white said the nhl is run by a bunch of old dinosaurs! Slap fighting is gets more views
Interesting stuff.
Maybe it's me but I still think the players are being screwed big time . The NHL is the only one of the big four where the owners 'share' profits with the players. Can you imagine MLB, NFL or NBA players entering into 50/50 split with the owners? Their unions would tell the owners 'UFO'
If you are a top player and you’ve shown your ability and leadership, go get your money. Go where you think you’ll get the money you deserve, and where you think you’ll thrive.
I wonder how many fans could actually name the owner of their favorite hockey team? (I sure don't)
It's all management and labor. The key word is balance. The way it is right now with NHL games is that it prices a lot of fans out of attending in person.
Trickle down economics always works though! Everyone knows that millionaires got that way by being happy to part with their funds
I don't have a problem with players making their money based on the revenues they generate. The only argument I might make (and call me a raging pinko if you like) is that perhaps we should have a cap on ticket prices and a cap on merchandise sales. You can deal with ticket prices easily. Just set a price and adjust it for inflation. As for merchandise sales, you can make everyone happy. Anything over a certain amount in merch revenue goes directly to the owner's favourite charity (and by that I DON'T mean one of his or her friends). And any team that couldn't operate under those conditions, well, maybe there's a better location for that team. Fair for the owners, players, and the most neglected of the 3, the Fans.
Obviously, that's totally unrealistic, but how about for a couple of years as a good will gesture to the fans who stood with the league through COVID? After everyone's gotten back all the money they lost. I'm being generous. Give me a break 🤣.
Networth is incredible
You have to remember that player careers don’t last as long as a regular people careers. These guys retire around 40. A doctor may continue to practice until they are 65 and maybe later. These players retire with all sorts of medical problems to contend with for the remainder of their lives. These players are entertainers. How much do actor’s make? How many people complain about how greedy actors are?
Make that money Canadian farm boy!
just for the nosebleed seats please
That whole summer through early winter of '94-'95 wasn't a great time to be a pro sports fan outside of the NFL.
The taxpayers in every league provide a free farm system with the colleges and universities then subsidize new stadiums. Cut it all off. If teams evaporate on all levels so be it. Sick of it.
Does the NHLPA have an annual fee that players pay and is disbursed upon a strike or lockout? just think a reserve fund like that could provide some protection for entry-level guys if they entered the league during a lockout or strike period?
Unions are a 100 day discussion
The owners cry and cap make money beyond belief.
I was fired for speaking of forming a union in Florida.
That sounds like typical Florida
The owners have NO chance of losing money because if they sell there team they will get a BILLION dollars or more . There are less than a 1000 people able to PLAY hockey and there career is short.
im of the mind the Players should be paid MORE
I couldn't afford tickets 30 years ago.
Professional sports remains a meat grinder of a career path…any day can be the day a player gets a career-ending injury. In other words, the players put their health on the line every time they go out there, so who can blame them for wanting to make as much money as they can before they have to stop?
The owners are at nothing like that kind of risk. Unless James Dolan gets blinded by a tomato thrown at his terrible band and somehow has to sell…or not even sell, but give away…the Rangers as a result, I’m just not seeing how there’s any comparison.
folks may bellyache that players are greedy. it's the players prerogative to earn the best they can in their finite career.
if the player chooses to leave $ on the table to help the front office pay other guys, that's his choice.
at the end of the day, the gm is responsible for making the numbers work to fit under the salary cap.
ok no hate but see the problem comes when the fans/players loyalty is to a dead duck if you with. ie quick in L.A.. he wasn't holding up his end of the contract they trade him and it's boo hoo how could you.
@michaelbecker2435 understandable, kings made the right business decision to trade quick, but got crucified for it by fans because they wanted quick to finish his career with the kings.
can't always make everyone happy. 🤷
I am glad the owners took a hardline against them unlike baseball. If the players complain they don't make much money then go find another job. Maybe start a business and see the costs.
Usually the support for players vs owners comes down to political ideology. Not always the case but generally from my experience its the case.
If anyone think players are greedy because they would have played for way less, we don’t want to watch you play. If I want to watch bad hockey being played by not the best players in the world, I can just go to the local rink. I paid good money to go see the players play, not owners to sit and count dollars.
Pretty much everyone wants to be paid what they think they're worth. The only reasonable way to figure out what that is comes from negotiating. The biggest change the union brought in was making salaries transparent. Once players knew what other players were getting then it made it a lot easier to stand firm in negotiations for your next deal.
On the cap, I was always in favour of it. It leads to more balance in the league, a guaranteed share of revenues for players, and reasonable profits for the teams as a whole. The 50% that teams get isn't profit. It's what pays for coaches, scouts, travel, meals, hotels, arenas, and all the other costs they incur to generate the revenue. And some profit.
before the cap, it was "our team can't afford this guy at 8+million per year". you don't see that anymore, now it's "we can't fit him under our cap"
unless it's Arizona, money isn't a problem for teams. 31 out of 32 teams respect the league minimum at least.