Constrained Optimisation using Lagrange's Multiplier.

[@fabiyibaliqeesololade9408]

Thank you so much, I understand this better than the class lecture.
It is helpful.

[@BirhaneGerezgiher]

Thanks for your nice way of solving problems

[@KiconcoJuliet-o7f]

Thanks very much for your good explanation 👍

You saved my life both in microeconomics and maths exams ❤

[@emerauderiziki9842]

Thank you! I am currently studying for BSc Business Economics and this helped so much!

[@ECONMATHS]

Thanks for the appreciation brother 👍. Keep watching and share

[@mostakislam9069]

i was looking for some examples coz my uni professor is soo confusing. was quit depressed and its so simple. Thank you soooo much

[@lameckbanda5293]

Very nice and students easy to achieve their goal in education

[@ECONMATHS]

Thanks for the appreciation brother. Please share this channel with your Economics friends

[@adhiamboannette8318]

I hardly understood this concept during the lecture...but am now way ward ahead. Thanks sir 🙏

[@ghmohd219]

Very inspiring and helpful video

[@nurudeenbaba9966]

Appreciated. Please keep it up

[@ECONMATHS]

Thanksfor the appreciation

[@mukhtardar1604]

Great video . Please keep it up

[@Shraa31]

Thank you so much sir

[@jessawatipachavula7852]

Well explained.....This video has really helped me 😍thank you for the tutorial

[@julielight1374]

Thanks alot

[@midhunmp6581]

Thankyou sir 🤩

[@priyankadoiphode5]

Sir thanks for your efforts 🙏👍

[@ECONMATHS]

Thanks for the appreciation

[@ishratjahan1703]

THANKS A TON!! Please keep uploading math solutions and discuss them. Thanks again!

[@ECONMATHS]

Thanks for the appreciation. If you think so then please share this channel with your Economics friends

[@jahnvisingh1341]

Thank you sir for putting these videos! They are very useful. I am studying at DSE and I get great help from you!

[@ECONMATHS]

Thanks for the appreciation. It really means a lot for me

[@ashwinram9893]

You are doing a very great job brother. God bless and keep going!

[@c-drama_fam]

I was stuck on this for 2 hours. This video helped a lot, thank you ❤️

[@BilalMunawar-zb2bm]

plz make lectures on dominicksalvatorebook of managerial economics

[@Psalmist_Wambua]

Thank you

[@amenyenyondo3413]

Thank you 🙏

[@ECONMATHS]

My pleasure brother. Please share this channel with your Economics friends

[@ECONMATHS]

The optimum value of X is 36 and that of Y is 20 and otherwise. Sorry for the bug

[@anonymouslyyours8268]

When we use the boarded hessain, the value of determinant comes as negative , which means function is at minimum. Pls clarify

[@mpandesyambayi5898]

Not clear how you subtracted 2nd equation from 1st equation for lambda coz they have the same Negative sign in brackets and a positive before them

[@simplyeconomics9414]

It's not subtracted 2nd eqn from 1st eqn ,he wrote like that. But actually subtracted 1st eqn from 2nd . So 1-2 is correct wrote there by mistake..

[@fayazgani2394]

Nice video

[@bupemusonda2940]

Thank you!!!!

[@ECONMATHS]

Thanks for the appreciation brother

[@renulather93]

Aap mathematical derivation bhi kra do utility max and min

[@TheSowwarnza]

Thank you for the video. If the constant changed to 58 what will lamda be? 348*2?

[@ECONMATHS]

Lamda is actually marginal thing here

[@KamrulHasan-kn7bv]

Yes.One unit change in the constraint function change the lamda same amount.

[@nehalama6733]

Thank you so much just want to clarify why you wrote X*=20 and y*=36 when initially we found the value of x=36 and y=20??? M actually not so good in maths pls guide

[@ECONMATHS]

Thanks for the feedback. You are right . It is a numerical mistake. It is X=36 and Y=20

[@ECONMATHS]

Thanks for the correction

[@sammiecolvin3144]

does u also change by 348 units?

[@bhueco0514]

U=x²+xy+y²+3z² subject to contrain x+2y+4z=60
Using Lagrange method for optimization 🙏sir pls iska solution bta dijiye

[@wooeidikd9412]

This is minimized if we use the hessian matrix

[@Oladunni21]

Does this method apply to minimize too?

[@MuhammadNadeem-pz3jp]

thanks

[@ECONMATHS]

My pleasure brother. Keep watching so that I can make more videos on Mathematical Economics

[@christiancostello9177]

this video is fucking sweet

[@friesandmayo]

fucking awesome am i right

[@michealemmanuel4290]

How did you get 2.8?

[@youtubeinmylife]

this problem is in CMA final SPMBV paper.Thank you

[@DaikiDavid]

9y / 5 is 1.8 right? or am I wrong? how did it become 2.8 please tell me thank you.

[@chostin0314]

I have a similar excersise but i have to find the relative extreme, can you help me please?

[@danishitoo1197]

really comprehensible for beginners but how could we know if it is minima or the maxima at the end

[@SabiraSabi-rv1zn]

Check bordered hessien method bro

[@afaqwatoo9947]

x ki value 2 dfa que?

[@altairseyis3566]

how is 9 divided by 5 is 2.8

[@Pravar]

4:30

[@zemerotto]

aap kashmir se hai na??

[@ECONMATHS]

Jinab

[@surajsen4707]

You missed a Y while solving after the subtraction

[@reshmar.u4699]

Could you explain how 2.8 got

[@ECONMATHS]

-1.8y-y = -2.8y
I hope you mean this

[@reshmar.u4699]

Thank you sir

[@bimochandhakal4786]

How 9/5=2.8???

[@ECONMATHS]

My mistake

[@bimochandhakal4786]

You did so many mistake from the beginning, please check it properly 56-x+y

[@abhijitdas2014]

This is not mistake,
1.8y-y =2.8y

[@uch27ly10]

@abhijit das isn't 1.8y- y = 0.8y??

[@alexowino2748]

At the final answer you have reversed the numbers...
x= 36
y = 20

[@michealemmanuel4290]

9÷5 is 1.8 not 2.8.

[@Cmakunal2023]

Any CMA FINAL student here

[@krishnagogoi5481]

Didn't anyone notice that at 5.32 it should be 1.8 instead of 2.8???

[@anmr_snqpl]

Good thing you pointed it out. I thought I was the only one who got 1.8 after dividing 9 and 5.
edited:
I know now why it's 2.8. The value of y is 1 and they added it to 1.8, so it turned into 2.8
correct me if I'm wrong.

[@jiakhan8983]

Bro -1.8-1 = 2.8 he solved the whole eqn .. after dividing 9y/5 he added it to 1y which in result gave 2.8

[@Amar...92]

I noticed brohh . I was confused.😅😅😅

[@petersimwanza2228]

Yes I saw the mistake when he was dividing

[@abrahamyrn]

Nope 2.8 is correct

[@rarekindme]

Thank you, that helped me a lot🤍

[@Medhansh-bm7qn]

thanks

[@ECONMATHS]

thanks for the appreciation brother. please share this channel with your friends also

[@SimanjaliSwaim]

Thanks you

[@Oladunni21]

Does this method apply to minimize too?

[@Oladunni21]

Does this method apply to minimize too?