Great arguments. But even if you take the ratio out of 4 to 700 plus it is still a very low risk of political influence. Saying it's inherently corrupt is labeling judges as inherently corrupt which is not good.
@@paddybrennan3644 naive as it may be probable, I am no better if I walk into a courtroom with this bias. Therefore, the seemingly endless wrong is overpowered by my expectations of righteousness within those with others destiny as their burden. I place my faith in God and country.
And taking the judges referral is kind of like deference
Great arguments. But even if you take the ratio out of 4 to 700 plus it is still a very low risk of political influence. Saying it's inherently corrupt is labeling judges as inherently corrupt which is not good.
They are
Corrupt
@@paddybrennan3644 naive as it may be probable, I am no better if I walk into a courtroom with this bias. Therefore, the seemingly endless wrong is overpowered by my expectations of righteousness within those with others destiny as their burden. I place my faith in God and country.