So, what is the estemation of launch? I hope in 2021 but i’m afraid that it will be 2022. What is your opinion on that? Would love to see sls finally fly:)
Reusability isn't very useful for the low expected flight rates for SLS And besides most active launch vehicles are currently fully expendable As a result I don't see why SLS being expendable is noteworthy Pretty much all rockets are
This but unironically, I like the fact SLS pisses all over the Space Shuttles legacy, it's like the ultimate F-U to reusability every time an RS-25 dies.
NASA has 12 sets of flight hardware on contract as of now and Artemis 2 and 3 are moving full steam ahead Artemis 2 SLS is already more than halfway built and integrated Artemis 3 hardware is also in various stages of fabrication Prepare to be surprised many times over
I would much rather the government commits to Artemis 1-3 then not at this point, and congress doesn't care if it's over budget, I think SLS has too much momentum to stop it now.
It is time to go back, to be planetary (to inhabit any celestial bodys within a planets sphere of influence) and then interplanetary to expand onwards and reach the stars that we have looked at for eons.
Except if you do that before fully testing any of them, you might just end up with 100 rockets that don't work. That's why in spacecraft development there's a design phase, a prototyping phase, a testing phase, and then a production phase (that is, when you know the design works and you can just get down to making many of them). R&D always takes more time and money than production. That's just a fact of reality.
@@OptimusNiaa Yes, but if you build a prototype with the only goal to make it work you end up with a manufacturing process that can't be scaled to high level production. You need to design your product and the factory at the same time.
@@johntheux9238 Why do you assume they have built a prototype with the only goal being to make it work? Taking as long as it has from design to first flight hardware is a function of R&D. There's no reason to assume the long time is due to inherent limitations in production facilities that cannot be expanded. Also, there's no reason for them to have the capacity to make 100 per year. That's an extremely extraordinarily high supply given the anticipated demand. NASA is not going to fly 100 Artemis and other exploration missions per year. And SLS, unlike the Commercial Crew vehicles, is built specifically and exclusively for NASA and its partners. And what NASA can do in a year is limited by their budget, among other things. Time will tell if Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed, Aerojet Rocketdyne, and Airbus have built adequate facilities to manufacture the optimal number of SLS rockets with Orion per year.
@@OptimusNiaa They want to go to the moon sustainably, which means going to the moon to stay. In 2019 there has been 12 cargo and 3 crew missions to the ISS. That's 15 launches per year.
@@OptimusNiaa it is expected that after artemis 3, engine production will be high enaugh to enable more launches. They could do 4 earlier, but they have not enaugh engines
I have high hopes for this program. It’s taking a little bit longer than it should, but it’s understandable. Beautiful work nonetheless.
This belongs to the most beautiful things man created !
Can't wait to see episode 500, when someone finally record an HD video on the moon!
I LOVE NASA WORK
When it is going to be launched??
Spectacular!
Artemis I has to be NASA's 100% top priority in 2021.
Literally so dope ✨
Is gateway still a thing?
Yes
Yea it’s still a thing
What orbit will Artemis be in?
So, what is the estemation of launch? I hope in 2021 but i’m afraid that it will be 2022. What is your opinion on that? Would love to see sls finally fly:)
I think they should put money in to research to travel light years not to travel to a boring rock called the moon
Can you make a version of this with narration instead of music for adults to watch?
2:31 me to my dog when he goes into heat
lmao
lol.....I was thinking 'mini me, stop humping the rocket'
It will be incredible when this rocket is ready to fly - some heartache tho to see the veteran RS-25s die in the ocean 😖
So great seeing all of the obscenely expensive hardware that's going to be thrown away to burn up instead of putting those billions into reuseability
Reusability isn't very useful for the low expected flight rates for SLS
And besides most active launch vehicles are currently fully expendable
As a result I don't see why SLS being expendable is noteworthy
Pretty much all rockets are
@@brokensoap1717 It's like talking to a wall. Not worth responding IMO.
This but unironically, I like the fact SLS pisses all over the Space Shuttles legacy, it's like the ultimate F-U to reusability every time an RS-25 dies.
What a boondoggle. If this thing flies more than once I will be very surprised.
NASA has 12 sets of flight hardware on contract as of now and Artemis 2 and 3 are moving full steam ahead
Artemis 2 SLS is already more than halfway built and integrated
Artemis 3 hardware is also in various stages of fabrication
Prepare to be surprised many times over
I would much rather the government commits to Artemis 1-3 then not at this point, and congress doesn't care if it's over budget, I think SLS has too much momentum to stop it now.
Well, in front of starship, true
@@brokensoap1717 spacex has built like 6-7 starships and some of them have even done a hop
Why does it take so long????
why so expensive ?
keep in mind that SLSs development has cost like 1/3rd of the Saturn Vs
because congress
Because it's a big rocket
The bigger the rocket the more expensive it gets
A nice glimpse into the great engineering!
This would have looked great in 2016
Every large aerospace project faces delays of some kind
SLS has had its fair share and now it's close to complete
impresionante wooow
NASA Artemis: Inside The Latest Mission To Moon Achievements - Episode 25
It is time to go back, to be planetary (to inhabit any celestial bodys within a planets sphere of influence) and then interplanetary to expand onwards and reach the stars that we have looked at for eons.
Cool
Love you NASA from india
Interesting
Heyyyy I love nasa
A TERRA É PLANA
Occupy moon
First from Cambodia
So much time to build one rocket... Try building 100 per year next time.
Except if you do that before fully testing any of them, you might just end up with 100 rockets that don't work.
That's why in spacecraft development there's a design phase, a prototyping phase, a testing phase, and then a production phase (that is, when you know the design works and you can just get down to making many of them). R&D always takes more time and money than production. That's just a fact of reality.
@@OptimusNiaa Yes, but if you build a prototype with the only goal to make it work you end up with a manufacturing process that can't be scaled to high level production.
You need to design your product and the factory at the same time.
@@johntheux9238 Why do you assume they have built a prototype with the only goal being to make it work? Taking as long as it has from design to first flight hardware is a function of R&D. There's no reason to assume the long time is due to inherent limitations in production facilities that cannot be expanded.
Also, there's no reason for them to have the capacity to make 100 per year. That's an extremely extraordinarily high supply given the anticipated demand. NASA is not going to fly 100 Artemis and other exploration missions per year. And SLS, unlike the Commercial Crew vehicles, is built specifically and exclusively for NASA and its partners. And what NASA can do in a year is limited by their budget, among other things.
Time will tell if Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed, Aerojet Rocketdyne, and Airbus have built adequate facilities to manufacture the optimal number of SLS rockets with Orion per year.
@@OptimusNiaa They want to go to the moon sustainably, which means going to the moon to stay.
In 2019 there has been 12 cargo and 3 crew missions to the ISS. That's 15 launches per year.
@@OptimusNiaa it is expected that after artemis 3, engine production will be high enaugh to enable more launches. They could do 4 earlier, but they have not enaugh engines
I am the first viewer and first comment and first like
No
2 comentario
whats with the stupid masks? Monkeys?
FAKE👍
Wdym, and wdym with the thumbs up emoji?
like your intelligence
Saying “fake” is considered to be a joke.
It’s like Binod, or Dicks out for Harambe.
This is not fake the apollo was fake. Just joking I was there to witness America's power