Nice job! Yes, the presenter is nervous but she stayed going and delivered a really solid presentation with valuable content. TED has a lot of highly polished presenters who deliver waffly content. This is much better than most of that.
People always try to convince me they are good multi-taskers but I have a hard time believing that. The "task switching" you mentioned makes a lot of sense to me. I have a hard time switching my focus across multiple things and it irks me that others say they are multi-taskers when in reality they are just better task switchers.
This was informative. I started looking this topic up because I studied multiple intelligences in grad school, but never did I think I'd encounter what I do now, at work....people who pick 1 'learning style' for themselves as an excuse to not make the effort to absorb information. It's like effort isn't taken into account now...managers bend over backwards out of fear of discriminating even when there isn't an actual learning disability in play. People learn that they can just drop this pop psychology term into the conversation to excuse their own laziness.
You've proved nothing. Some of this was useful, but most of this was an exercise in overintellectualized research. There are preferred ways that people learn. Sometimes they use these methods without knowing the categorizations. Thank the Creator of the universe that there ARE the categorizations. Now, do folks learn according to a hybrid or combination of the different learning styles? The answer is YES. However, don't dismiss the learning styles, because they give people understandings of how they learn best.
The key word you used in your third sentence was "preferred". Research has shown that there is no correlation between learning in a preferred style and having higher retention of content.
@@mobiusII Yes, there is NO guarantee that ALL students will have a higher retention of content, but what guarantee is there that the masses will not have a higher retention of content? A Guestimate???
@@josephjefferson2617 Yes, these findings are the result of the scientific testing of the Learning Styles hypothesis. The results found zero, and sometimes a negative, correlation between lessons and assessments administered according to learning styles and student performance. There have been several of these studies done that all achieved the same results. Like all studies, random sampling and repeatable outcomes allow the researchers to extrapolate the results to the population as a whole.
Nice job! Yes, the presenter is nervous but she stayed going and delivered a really solid presentation with valuable content. TED has a lot of highly polished presenters who deliver waffly content. This is much better than most of that.
Yes she is obviously brave for fighting through it. People are assholes w their comments.
2:08 learning styles do not exist
6:45 task switching poor learning
7:10 testing yourself (retrieval practice)
8:05 desirable difficulty and motivation to learn
8:30 interleaving (learning better mixing up skills)
People always try to convince me they are good multi-taskers but I have a hard time believing that. The "task switching" you mentioned makes a lot of sense to me. I have a hard time switching my focus across multiple things and it irks me that others say they are multi-taskers when in reality they are just better task switchers.
she did such a good job!
I CANNNTTT WITH THE OMMSSSS
Great material. I think it was a shame that she seemed so nervous during this speech. But great points!
Very informative session. Gives you something to think about when you hear people say they are great at multi-tasking.
"The struggle is real"
um no um kidding
This was informative. I started looking this topic up because I studied multiple intelligences in grad school, but never did I think I'd encounter what I do now, at work....people who pick 1 'learning style' for themselves as an excuse to not make the effort to absorb information. It's like effort isn't taken into account now...managers bend over backwards out of fear of discriminating even when there isn't an actual learning disability in play. People learn that they can just drop this pop psychology term into the conversation to excuse their own laziness.
thank you! Amazing. I've always thought these myths make no sense at all
Amazing talk, wonderful session.
Outstanding and amazing session.
Very live and informative lecture
-Dr Virenkumar Pandya
BDK ARTS AND COMMERCE COLLEGE GADHADA
Interesting session
informative session
excellent presentation of misconceptions of learning style ... mixing up skills is better for learning
i cant focus with the UMs
Amazing talk on the prospects of language
Very Informative session
Amazing, wonderful session ...
Good job, excellent presentation
Very good information.
Very nice..
Wonderful job!
Thank you
Informative. Thank you
Take a breath girl!x
Finally. Someone making sense
Thank you mam
Very Informative
Content matters more than learning style also interleaving(mixing of skills) is something which can help the learners.
Nice information great talk
Great advice for learning
Amazing view
Good job
Thanks
Nice
Very informative
Enlightening
Good work
Amazing
nice information
बहुत अच्छा
Brilliant
सुन्दर
Nice one.
Nice sir
Nice and crispy
Nice video
Very much informative session. 🙏🙏
Good
anyone else find it hard to follow because of the 1,000 umm?
Great talk, thank you ;)
100 "oms" btw, I multi-tasked, using auditory and visual skills while still paying attention to the content
Sounds like you tuned out the interview and then back in selectively while searching the information.
@@ncpolley Searching for the information in the grey matter, indeed.
Let's hear your TED talk. yeah, I didn't think so.
Best
સરસ
Every sentence began with "Umm" The information was interesting, but UMM maybe she should take a public speaking class?
that's tough buddy. content should be given better focus than learning styles
UMM x300.
CRT is part of edu-cash-in
Minute and half into it and the only thing I get from it is “um” every 15 seconds. 😫
*UM*
uhm, uhm, uhm, uhm
This video should be renamed “Mixed signals: do I really know what I’m talking about?” 😂
You've proved nothing. Some of this was useful, but most of this was an exercise in overintellectualized research. There are preferred ways that people learn. Sometimes they use these methods without knowing the categorizations. Thank the Creator of the universe that there ARE the categorizations. Now, do folks learn according to a hybrid or combination of the different learning styles? The answer is YES. However, don't dismiss the learning styles, because they give people understandings of how they learn best.
The key word you used in your third sentence was "preferred". Research has shown that there is no correlation between learning in a preferred style and having higher retention of content.
@@mobiusII Yes, there is NO guarantee that ALL students will have a higher retention of content, but what guarantee is there that the masses will not have a higher retention of content? A Guestimate???
I agree with the 1st part of your statement, but I don't understand the 2nd part. Could you elaborate?
@@mobiusII LOL. What are these findings based upon? A small segment of a population?
@@josephjefferson2617 Yes, these findings are the result of the scientific testing of the Learning Styles hypothesis. The results found zero, and sometimes a negative, correlation between lessons and assessments administered according to learning styles and student performance. There have been several of these studies done that all achieved the same results. Like all studies, random sampling and repeatable outcomes allow the researchers to extrapolate the results to the population as a whole.
Very informative session
thank you
Nice
Excellent, thank you:)
Very informative session
Nice