@@DarkHorseSki CV90 best all around, options on options on options, can be customized to fit virtually any need, low profile, combat proven, the 40mm cannon is a beast, etc.
@@tomeng9520 The KF41 is designed, from the start to be even more modular and customizable. And there are versions of the KF41 mounting the 50mm beast (check out the OMFV submission), and Rheinmetall has a long record of combat proven vehicles. And, cost for the KF41 is significantly less. Lynx is a better vehicle (by just a bit) at a much better cost (by quite a bit.) This very channel made note of that when it talked about the LAND 400 competition in Australia (within the last couple of years.)
Soon, there may be two different IFVs in Poland, claiming to be the best in their class in the world. The light BORSUK IFV and the heavy PL-21 IFV based on the AS-21 REDBACK IFV. While Borsuk is already starting to be produced, PL-21 is being negotiated as to what it will look like as a final product. The Borsuk IFV was designed with the terrain in mind. More precisely, it is about overcoming various water sewage, which is why it is a light IFV. The PL-21, on the other hand, may consist of: 1) a chassis fitted with the K9 Thunder and AHS Krab cannon-howitzers. 2) ZSSW-30 unmanned turret ( Borsuk has one). 3) IronVision system. 4) IronFist system. 5) Topaz system. 6) the armor remains the same as on the Redback. 7) hybrid engine
K 21 very impressive and closer to the needs of an ifv! In the rest of cv 90 you have to stop shooting?! 🤨 Puma the other day a fell all the army tests!😌Lynx e ifv or tank, 44 tons 😏!
I would like to thank the director who made this film. I enjoyed watching this film because each military equipment shown in this film had its own qualities. I also find the film about military technicians from different countries very interesting. The author of this film wishes you success in your next film.
no it was 18 vehicle breakdowns during a training excercise. This was due to thee poor maintenance conditiion of the vehicles, wich had been submitted to extensive combat training and excercises in the weeks/months preceeding the incident without the required maintenance applied to them at the neccesary intervall.
It is a strange tradition of Nato countries to put German tanks or AFV to the 1st place. It is not field proven. Just send them to Ukraine battle field and you will see that it is not more efficient than other AFV.
The Bradley COULD have its life extended with the addition of a 50 mm cannon and a 6.5 mm machine gun (using 80,000 psi combat velocity ammo). Likingthat Swedish CV-90 and that 40 mm cannon.
Claims that only will show IFVs that arr already in production... Proceeds to show russian IFV that is still in testing and who knows when will see production if ever. BTW Ukranie has BMP4 in production for years, and it has proven it self on battlefield.
Not really. These 18 Pumas that broke were just assigned for the NATO' s VJTF (fast reaction forces). So not all they have in total :-) 350 were delivered, probably. However, they say Pumas have issus since beginning. They adopted them in 2015 and allegedely only in 2017 they were regarded as fight ready. But they have constant issues with them
@@BartoszFalkowski those problems are primarily maintenance related. The CDU Govrnment cut basicly all maintenance capability of the Bundeswehr in 2010 and since then the Bundeswehr struggles with readiness rates etc
The concept of ‘armoured infantry’, i.e. letting soldiers run across the battlefield in groups, should be fundamentally questioned. Nowadays, seeking infantry combat no longer makes sense for unprotected people, also because their combat value drops to zero after the first contact with the enemy, as they are only concerned with surviving. As an observer, target designator or operator of a weapon system from a protected position, yes, but for towing, storming and throwing hand grenades, no. Das Konzept "Panzergrenadier", also Soldaten in Gruppen übers Schlachtfeld laufenzulassen, sollte grundsätzlich hinterfragt werden. Heutzutage einen infanteristischen Kampf zu suchen, macht für ungeschützte Menschen keinen Sinn mehr, auch weil nachdem ersten Feindkontakt ihr Kampfwert gegen null fällt, da sie nur noch mit überleben beschäftigt sind. Als Beobachter, Zieleinweiser oder Bediener eines Waffensystem aus geschützter Position, ja, aber zum Schleppen, stürmen und Handgranaten werfen, nein.
@@Trinity3-75 But Rheinmetall didn't show off in Australia 😂 and Korean crap didn't pass tests in Poland. The turret from the Romans is disastrous, not to mention the chassis.
Although the Redbackis a great machine, I'm not sure it's because it was better or the fact it was a political move, because the governme😊nt cut the amount of SP howitzers from Korea so they had to do something not to upset the Koreans?
in comparison to Borsuk, Puma has significantly heavier armor protection and more advanced weapon systems. Also Puma is in production and service, while Borsuk has a single Prototype produced.
@@zhufortheimpaler4041 You should really read about the Borsuk & Puma because you got no clue what ur writing about. Holy cow where to start... The Bursuk IFV is not 1 version but a modular plattform UMPG (Uniwersalna Modułowa Platforma Gąsienicowa) for example more composite armour can be fittet BUT doing so results in a 44t vehicle loosing its amphibious ablity. A Borsuk base model only weighs 28t. While the Puma protecton lvl A weighs 31,5t BTW 5 Borsuk have been build. The prototype test phase was completed in late 2022 & the Polish army was finally satisfied with the changes made. Thus the Polish goverment ordered this FEBRUARY 1400 Borsuk. While the German GOV is WAS planing to get max 350 Pumas in TOTAL. The Puma has a traditional Continuous track while the Bursuk is using a modern & lighter & much quieter CRT (Composite rubber track) Further more the Borsuk has a hard kill APS while the Puma has only a passive one. Thats a huge deal. Borsuk's main armarment is a Mk44 Bushmaster II, this cannon has higher firerate that Pumas MK 30-2/ABM even tho both use the exact same caliber. Both IFV use also the same Israeli Spike ATGM's. The Puma can only hold 200 rounds of cannon ammo in it turret & CANNOT be rearmed from within the Puma, this is another a fatal flaw. Because labour & materials are way cheaper in Poland the Borsuk cost 10 million USD & the Puma a wopping 17 million USD ( the most expensive IFV on this planet). Both have cameras instead of pericopes. The Pumas are infact so advanced that during the lastest Bundeswehr training exercise in 2022 ALL 18 Pumas broke down.... All further production of the Puma IFV thus have been halted. Now germany wants to pull out their phased out Marder IFV again... This was just another massive scandal in Germany & every body is blaming the other why it went so terribly wrong. I could go on & on but im tires of correcting people all the time for brabbling out nonsense.
@@ArmyEncyclopedia The Polish GOV just ordered 1400 Bursuk IFV in Feburary this year. Also why didn't you mention that during the lastest training exercise of the Bundeswehr, all 18 of the "Worlds best IFV" Puma broke down & all further production has been canceled? That was last year. Look it up, this Puma scandal was even News in Switzerland.
@@quigonjinn3567 the Pumas broke down due to lack of maintenance after serveral weeks of heavy combat training prior to that excercise. only one of the problems was severe enough that minor maintenance wouldnt have prevented it. Germany wanted to procure 750 Puma´s, the number was reduced to 350, but currently another 150 are on order. Production was continued months ago. And still Borsuk has ZERO Produced numbers right now and just a handfull of pre production prototypes.
🔴 I think it depends on the crew's training. I think it doesn't matter what IFV it is. You have to get the most out of your device. Above all, you have to master the electronics on board.- With no infantry to accompany you, you'll be quickly shot down with a bazooka.
Lynx is based on Puma Technology. Puma is a joint venture between KMW and Rheinmetall, Lynx only uses the Rheinmetall components of the Puma developement. It is designed to be less sofisticated and complex and thus cheaper to produce and be more customizable for international customers.
@@Greekmilsim fair enough. But keep in mind that lynx didnt really have time to mature. It will get its first year of service this year and we can bet on it that alot of teething issues will surface that have been ironed out on Puma already. Most AFV´s have teething problems in their first few years of service. Those show up as the fleet of in service vehicles gets larger and the sample size increases.
email me if u want to get educated in ifvs lmfao.. you must be german. reinmetal has not been the top for a bit now ...its like china saying they have the best stealth fighters.....lol
not really. puma´s readiiness problems primarily come from lack of proper high level maintenance. The Bundeswehr lost the majority of their own maintenance units and capability in 2010 with the MOD cutting these parts to save money in the Budget. Since then the bundeswehr struggles with readiness rates. 95% of issues with Puma are due to lack of maintenance and too high usage. The "famous" broken down 18 vehicles at the start of the year were used in heavy combat training for weeks without major maintenance and overhaul as part of the VJTF training and qualification prior to the relevant event.
Ales schön und gut, aber wo her nimmt ihr die, Schwach sehnigen Preise? Wie auch in den anderen Videos who ein Italienischer 8×8Viachel angeblich über 10.000.000 Millionen kosten soll? Über Prüfen Sie ihre Quellen bevor sie falsch Info verbreiten.
According to the program for the purchase of armored vehicles 381 infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) Freccia will be purchased, co-produced by the Italian consortium Conzorzio Iveco Oto Melara. The cost of this equipment is about € 2,65 bn (USD 4.02 billion), the purchase will be carried out until 2024. 4,020,000,000$/381=10,551,181$
► More Military videos on: th-cam.com/video/46R9xWQGBMM/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=QUASAREntertainment
The CV90 120 with it's 120mm main gun can even support main battle tanks. Very versatile
The Lynx has demonstrated a much better working version with their KF120 version of the vehicle.
cv looks cool too more like a small tank...love it
AS21 Redbacks
CV90 Wins hands down.
Agreed, best all around, options on options on options, can be customized to fit virtually any need, low profile, combat proven, etc.
Nope. KF41 does everything the CV90 does but even better.
@@DarkHorseSki CV90 best all around, options on options on options, can be customized to fit virtually any need, low profile, combat proven, the 40mm cannon is a beast, etc.
@@tomeng9520 The KF41 is designed, from the start to be even more modular and customizable. And there are versions of the KF41 mounting the 50mm beast (check out the OMFV submission), and Rheinmetall has a long record of combat proven vehicles. And, cost for the KF41 is significantly less. Lynx is a better vehicle (by just a bit) at a much better cost (by quite a bit.) This very channel made note of that when it talked about the LAND 400 competition in Australia (within the last couple of years.)
Yup, CV90's the way to go, those not seeing that, I pity.
Keep up the great work!
The Cv 90 rules them all...
Where is Redback ?
I think Australia's new ifv Are definitely up their with the best they both look as good as one another I'd go with the redback
Soon, there may be two different IFVs in Poland, claiming to be the best in their class in the world. The light BORSUK IFV and the heavy PL-21 IFV based on the AS-21 REDBACK IFV. While Borsuk is already starting to be produced, PL-21 is being negotiated as to what it will look like as a final product. The Borsuk IFV was designed with the terrain in mind. More precisely, it is about overcoming various water sewage, which is why it is a light IFV. The PL-21, on the other hand, may consist of: 1) a chassis fitted with the K9 Thunder and AHS Krab cannon-howitzers. 2) ZSSW-30 unmanned turret ( Borsuk has one). 3) IronVision system. 4) IronFist system. 5) Topaz system. 6) the armor remains the same as on the Redback.
7) hybrid engine
A HYBRID ENGINE will become "standard" equipment on many new IFVs - if militaries are smart!
K 21 very impressive and closer to the needs of an ifv! In the rest of cv 90 you have to stop shooting?! 🤨 Puma the other day a fell all the army tests!😌Lynx e ifv or tank, 44 tons 😏!
I would like to thank the director who made this film. I enjoyed watching this film because each military equipment shown in this film had its own qualities. I also find the film about military technicians from different countries very interesting. The author of this film wishes you success in your next film.
Correct . Leopold Tank were destroyed in Ukraine 3:21 by Russian Lancet Missile.Although German MBT Leopold was considered one to be #1 .
It's still considered #1. Ukraine losses even supported that because the vast majority of crews dismounted unharmed after being hit.
leopold 😂
How can Puma be number 1? It failed in 18 tests
no it was 18 vehicle breakdowns during a training excercise.
This was due to thee poor maintenance conditiion of the vehicles, wich had been submitted to extensive combat training and excercises in the weeks/months preceeding the incident without the required maintenance applied to them at the neccesary intervall.
It was on fire by his electric wiring 😂😂
AS21 REDBACK?????
AS21 Redbacks
It is a strange tradition of Nato countries to put German tanks or AFV to the 1st place. It is not field proven. Just send them to Ukraine battle field and you will see that it is not more efficient than other AFV.
The armor is kinda proven bozo, it literally has the same roof armor as the PZH 2000 which took a Lancet hit to the roof and didn't penetrate.
its proved by the Canadian‘s and Netherland‘s
It is a strange tradition of same TH-camrs to put German tanks or AFV to the 1st place, nothing else!
CV 90 FTW!!!!
The Bradley COULD have its life extended with the addition of a 50 mm cannon and a 6.5 mm machine gun (using 80,000 psi combat velocity ammo). Likingthat Swedish CV-90 and that 40 mm cannon.
The US version of the OMFV (whichever it turns out to be among the candidates) will have the 50mm gun.
Claims that only will show IFVs that arr already in production... Proceeds to show russian IFV that is still in testing and who knows when will see production if ever. BTW Ukranie has BMP4 in production for years, and it has proven it self on battlefield.
These are nothing a javelin couldn't handle.
Ignorant .Modern ifvs have trophy system
modern tanks and ifvs have defeans system capably to destroy incoming antitank missles
@@ekarus4360 and HEAT rounds
Puma has an active protection system fitted to defeat Missiles like Javelin. Its called MUSS.
@@zhufortheimpaler4041 they cannot defeat a top attack
What to your video you made and ranked SABRAH no 2?
German army has 18 PUMAs, but not one is operative
Not really. These 18 Pumas that broke were just assigned for the NATO' s VJTF (fast reaction forces). So not all they have in total :-) 350 were delivered, probably. However, they say Pumas have issus since beginning. They adopted them in 2015 and allegedely only in 2017 they were regarded as fight ready. But they have constant issues with them
😂😂😂😂
@@BartoszFalkowski those problems are primarily maintenance related.
The CDU Govrnment cut basicly all maintenance capability of the Bundeswehr in 2010 and since then the Bundeswehr struggles with readiness rates etc
Sono tutti belli
Tandem charge defeats slat armour. They defeat single charge rounds like old RPG rounds. Javelin goes through it like its nothing.
4:38 this one is disgustingly strong in A.W.
What's the cost
Kurganets-25 (Russia) Paper😉
Топ ваш фигня, пока эти машины не испытаются в реальном бою, а не на полигоне)
Damn even Russian bots play battlefield 5 damn
Nên có thông số cơ bản:khối lượng,công suất,.v..v...
The concept of ‘armoured infantry’, i.e. letting soldiers run across the battlefield in groups, should be fundamentally questioned. Nowadays, seeking infantry combat no longer makes sense for unprotected people, also because their combat value drops to zero after the first contact with the enemy, as they are only concerned with surviving. As an observer, target designator or operator of a weapon system from a protected position, yes, but for towing, storming and throwing hand grenades, no.
Das Konzept "Panzergrenadier", also Soldaten in Gruppen übers Schlachtfeld laufenzulassen, sollte grundsätzlich hinterfragt werden. Heutzutage einen infanteristischen Kampf zu suchen, macht für ungeschützte Menschen keinen Sinn mehr, auch weil nachdem ersten Feindkontakt ihr Kampfwert gegen null fällt, da sie nur noch mit überleben beschäftigt sind. Als Beobachter, Zieleinweiser oder Bediener eines Waffensystem aus geschützter Position, ja, aber zum Schleppen, stürmen und Handgranaten werfen, nein.
Where is the IDF Namer?
PL-01 CONCEPT
PL-01 CONCEPT. Where is?
as it says in its name: concept.
Not even prototype vehicles availible
CV90 cant withstand 30mm AP rounds. But it can withstand a 20kg mine.
No Namer ? The only IFV with APS.
Puma has also MUSS APS
Borsuk? Where is?
Borsuk? never tested in the field. funny polish.
@@Trinity3-75 But Rheinmetall didn't show off in Australia 😂 and Korean crap didn't pass tests in Poland. The turret from the Romans is disastrous, not to mention the chassis.
this is why they say youtube is misinforming...you forgot the best one rebback the one one that beat lynx in the lamd 400 challenge,,,,
Although the Redbackis a great machine, I'm not sure it's because it was better or the fact it was a political move, because the governme😊nt cut the amount of SP howitzers from Korea so they had to do something not to upset the Koreans?
Jep the Puma is the "best" in failing & being a billion Euro grave. BTW where is the BORSUK IFV ?
The BORSUK IFV is still being tested.
in comparison to Borsuk, Puma has significantly heavier armor protection and more advanced weapon systems.
Also Puma is in production and service, while Borsuk has a single Prototype produced.
@@zhufortheimpaler4041 You should really read about the Borsuk & Puma because you got no clue what ur writing about. Holy cow where to start...
The Bursuk IFV is not 1 version but a modular plattform UMPG (Uniwersalna Modułowa Platforma Gąsienicowa)
for example more composite armour can be fittet BUT doing so results in a 44t vehicle loosing its amphibious ablity.
A Borsuk base model only weighs 28t. While the Puma protecton lvl A weighs 31,5t
BTW 5 Borsuk have been build.
The prototype test phase was completed in late 2022 & the Polish army was finally satisfied with the changes made.
Thus the Polish goverment ordered this FEBRUARY 1400 Borsuk.
While the German GOV is WAS planing to get max 350 Pumas in TOTAL.
The Puma has a traditional Continuous track while the Bursuk is using a modern & lighter & much quieter
CRT (Composite rubber track)
Further more the Borsuk has a hard kill APS while the Puma has only a passive one. Thats a huge deal.
Borsuk's main armarment is a Mk44 Bushmaster II, this cannon has higher firerate that Pumas MK 30-2/ABM
even tho both use the exact same caliber. Both IFV use also the same Israeli Spike ATGM's.
The Puma can only hold 200 rounds of cannon ammo in it turret & CANNOT be rearmed from within the Puma,
this is another a fatal flaw.
Because labour & materials are way cheaper in Poland the Borsuk cost 10 million USD & the Puma a wopping 17 million USD ( the most expensive IFV on this planet). Both have cameras instead of pericopes.
The Pumas are infact so advanced that during the lastest Bundeswehr training exercise in 2022 ALL 18 Pumas broke down.... All further production of the Puma IFV thus have been halted.
Now germany wants to pull out their phased out Marder IFV again...
This was just another massive scandal in Germany & every body is blaming the other why it went so terribly wrong.
I could go on & on but im tires of correcting people all the time for brabbling out nonsense.
@@ArmyEncyclopedia The Polish GOV just ordered 1400 Bursuk IFV in Feburary this year.
Also why didn't you mention that during the lastest training exercise of the Bundeswehr, all 18 of the "Worlds best IFV" Puma broke down & all further production has been canceled?
That was last year. Look it up, this Puma scandal was even News in Switzerland.
@@quigonjinn3567 the Pumas broke down due to lack of maintenance after serveral weeks of heavy combat training prior to that excercise.
only one of the problems was severe enough that minor maintenance wouldnt have prevented it.
Germany wanted to procure 750 Puma´s, the number was reduced to 350, but currently another 150 are on order.
Production was continued months ago.
And still Borsuk has ZERO Produced numbers right now and just a handfull of pre production prototypes.
I Like ASCOD from Spain (Pizarro) and Lynx.
TULPAR
🔴 I think it depends on the crew's training. I think it doesn't matter what IFV it is. You have to get the most out of your device. Above all, you have to master the electronics on board.- With no infantry to accompany you, you'll be quickly shot down with a bazooka.
Volvo 740
Puma n01......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
为啥人家的迷彩都很好看，墙国的迷彩和塑料玩具一样，土
Thumb down,you missed Polish Borsuk which beats most of them in any way!
Indonesia should be able to make IFV like these, hopefully in the future Indonesia will make its own IFV. .. 😁
god this voice is worse than the tiktok one
hot garbage use of decent TTS imo
불량품이 일위네....
wrong.. cv90 best
Bradley at number 6 is joke😂😂
Puma better than lynx 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lynx is based on Puma Technology.
Puma is a joint venture between KMW and Rheinmetall, Lynx only uses the Rheinmetall components of the Puma developement.
It is designed to be less sofisticated and complex and thus cheaper to produce and be more customizable for international customers.
@@zhufortheimpaler4041 i prefer lynx
@@Greekmilsim fair enough.
But keep in mind that lynx didnt really have time to mature.
It will get its first year of service this year and we can bet on it that alot of teething issues will surface that have been ironed out on Puma already.
Most AFV´s have teething problems in their first few years of service.
Those show up as the fleet of in service vehicles gets larger and the sample size increases.
puma have so many mechanical faults, loads of them are not combat operational and have a heavy maintance cost
Your information is from about 2 years ago lol
T15 Armata
email me if u want to get educated in ifvs lmfao.. you must be german. reinmetal has not been the top for a bit now ...its like china saying they have the best stealth fighters.....lol
Puma ? 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 PUMA IS ALWAYS BROKEN IS THIS A JOKE ? 😂😂🤣BEST IS TURKEY AND SOUTH KOREA👍💪
not really.
puma´s readiiness problems primarily come from lack of proper high level maintenance.
The Bundeswehr lost the majority of their own maintenance units and capability in 2010 with the MOD cutting these parts to save money in the Budget.
Since then the bundeswehr struggles with readiness rates.
95% of issues with Puma are due to lack of maintenance and too high usage.
The "famous" broken down 18 vehicles at the start of the year were used in heavy combat training for weeks without major maintenance and overhaul as part of the VJTF training and qualification prior to the relevant event.
Гавно эти ваши БМП в бою надо их проверить а не на полигонах
Ales schön und gut, aber wo her nimmt ihr die, Schwach sehnigen Preise? Wie auch in den anderen Videos who ein Italienischer 8×8Viachel angeblich über 10.000.000 Millionen kosten soll?
Über Prüfen Sie ihre Quellen bevor sie falsch Info verbreiten.
According to the program for the purchase of armored vehicles 381 infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) Freccia will be purchased, co-produced by the Italian consortium Conzorzio Iveco Oto Melara. The cost of this equipment is about € 2,65 bn (USD 4.02 billion), the purchase will be carried out until 2024.
4,020,000,000$/381=10,551,181$
przeciez niemcy skopiowali Polski lekki czolg PL1 to jesy chamstwo ze nikt o tym nie mowi