Will Man City Actually Get RELEGATED Next Season?!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
  • Get 20% Off and Free Shipping with the code THEKICKOFF at www.manscaped....
    #AD
    **“SkinSafeTM technology does not guarantee cut protection.”
    📧 Business Email : info@truegeordie.com
    🎙️ TG Channel : / @truegeordie
    🥊 The Pain Game : / @paingamepodcast
    ⚽️ The Kick Off : / @thekickoff
    🐦 Twitter : / truegeordietg
    📸 Instagram : / truegeordieofficial
  • กีฬา

ความคิดเห็น • 526

  • @joeloates1685
    @joeloates1685 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +541

    I find it hilarious how True Geordie has spent years hating on Man City for sportswashing (and rightfully so) but is fuming now that there are rules being brought in to stop the Saudis doing the same with his beloved Newcastle. Can't have it both ways mate.

    • @thewalkingpotofjam
      @thewalkingpotofjam 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      it’s the fact that the rules were brought in specifically to stop newcastle’s owners doing what city had done - there had been no attempt to monitor or prevent city’s spending before that. it reeks of protecting the established clubs and stopping competition

    • @jaket4441
      @jaket4441 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      @@thewalkingpotofjamthe rules were brought in 2012 to stop city mate.

    • @joeloates1685
      @joeloates1685 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @thewalkingpotofjam So what? Why would we want another Man City? And City have been charged, we just need them to be punished which Geordie ironically probably doesn't want now because he knows it'll stop Newcastle

    • @jamesgallagher5907
      @jamesgallagher5907 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Yep he has completely changed his views just because Newcastle have been bought.

    • @toonarmy8524
      @toonarmy8524 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Newcastle havent broke the rules though even though they have had the resources to do so for 3 seasons nearly. there`s nothing hilarious about it

  • @CH-vh1sw
    @CH-vh1sw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +186

    The fact that he thinks the Saudis bought Newcastle ‘to have fun’ is actually painfully laughable.

    • @jackzeldon2883
      @jackzeldon2883 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Cry more🤣🤣......

    • @LukeJohnson-tw5bo
      @LukeJohnson-tw5bo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @jackzeldon2883 when you kids say that, it hold more water when you don't use your mums broadband

    • @dripsensei_6639
      @dripsensei_6639 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      wdym i haven’t really looked into it but i always thought buying newcastle and making them an elite european team was just a flex of wealth and power for the saudis more than anything

    • @CH-vh1sw
      @CH-vh1sw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@dripsensei_6639 it’s purely sports washing, not about having fun. It’s about using a British institution to try and rehab an image of a brutal authoritarian country. You’ve got a full city in Newcastle who deny their chairman had a journalist killed and chopped up now because he spends money on footballers.

    • @saintdon4461
      @saintdon4461 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CH-vh1sw then took him out in a suitcase

  • @aeongenesis4181
    @aeongenesis4181 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    These guys are actually clueless. City aren't counter suing they are challenging the league on the new APT rules and saying the league can't legally enforce that rule on the league as its against competition laws in uk. Mind you uefa have a sponsorship law aswell but the one the epl have announced are targeted towards City and Newcastle hence why City has challenged them. Furthermore the outcome of City challenging the rules aren't gonna affect the 115 because this new rule was never in place when the 115 charges happened.

    • @eoslovestithonus
      @eoslovestithonus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Almost everyone I've heard talking about this subject is clueless unfortunately.

    • @conquerantmutombo9957
      @conquerantmutombo9957 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@eoslovestithonusthey care about clicks more than facts sadly

    • @Stegibbon
      @Stegibbon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They're charged with inflating sponsorships and they're suing about a rule that stops you inflating sponsorships. That might not be the exact rule they broke but if you think they're not trying to at least set a legal precedent here then you're plainly deluded.

    • @gaultyok
      @gaultyok 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Stegibbon Uefa have had this rule in for years well before the prem, City not sueing Uefa as Uefa rule is fairer to everyone. Also you read need to read the charges before commenting

    • @aeongenesis4181
      @aeongenesis4181 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Stegibbon dumbass there's no legal precedent to set when that rule was never in place when the 115 happened. There's zero correlation between the 115 and the City challenging the league on the sponsorship rules because if City win the case the rule will be amended it not go away

  • @Cbart23
    @Cbart23 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    The greedy premier league let the wolves into the hen house two decades ago.

    • @augment999
      @augment999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Come on mate Wolverhampton Wanderers are innocent bystanders here don't drag them into this

    • @princegeorge13
      @princegeorge13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@augment999 He wasn't talking about Wolverhampton Wanderers mate, he meant that the Greed Premier League allowed Chelsea, Manchester City and other clubs to get taken over by billionaires owners over 20 years ago. Even clubs like Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal all have Billionaire owners or billionaire shareholders. That's what he's referring to

    • @benjaminngopwaamos6878
      @benjaminngopwaamos6878 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@princegeorge13 Man United and Liverpool are undoubtedly the biggest and most successful clubs in England. They may have billionaire owners, but United especially have not gotten a penny for almost 20 years from the Glazers. United are not meant to be in that list of clubs you mentioned.

    • @daboydudus3912
      @daboydudus3912 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@benjaminngopwaamos6878they are, just cause u did before 2005 dont mean its ok

    • @kurtsudheim825
      @kurtsudheim825 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No shirt sherlock, but you can't make rules until something goes wrong. Do you think speed humps were invented before the car? Why wasn't nord van or whoever these guys are always promoting come out before the Internet. Pool rules... unless you have brilliant foresight, you come up with rules once you recognise a problem, that's how things evolve

  • @garethwhittaker9560
    @garethwhittaker9560 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    The arsenal fan literally just makes things up. Wolves brought var and nearly got it overturned? Dude the vote was 19 to 1 🤣

    • @eoslovestithonus
      @eoslovestithonus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The point was that the Clubs could've got rid of VAR if they wanted to...

    • @garethwhittaker9560
      @garethwhittaker9560 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well yes the clubs are the members do they should be able to change rules.

    • @pauldowney4280
      @pauldowney4280 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's a proper muppet

  • @georgebeech491
    @georgebeech491 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    its so annoying listening to brian mention newcastle every 3 seconds

    • @eoslovestithonus
      @eoslovestithonus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He is a Newcastle fan to be fair 🤣

    • @KH-xv5gm
      @KH-xv5gm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He is a Newcastle fan, why wouldn't he!

    • @TomDeLaCruz
      @TomDeLaCruz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      thats like watching the overlap and getting annoyed that they always talk about man utd, well obviously

    • @86Refire
      @86Refire 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The subject doesn’t matter either they’ll be talking about hazard vs Neymar and he’ll still find a way to bring up Newcastle lol

    • @declanure9922
      @declanure9922 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Called true geordie mate

  • @James-qv1dr
    @James-qv1dr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +107

    Dumbest convo. You don't need to spend crazy money to improve your team, you just have to buy well. These teams want to just spend 400mil every year until they are the best team

    • @joshuaw9675
      @joshuaw9675 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Joey acting like he’s club hasn’t spent £1 billion bringing players in for the past few seasons and still has a mediocre squad lol. He wants Man City to win so that Todd Boehly can keep throwing more money at useless players like a retrd and make himself bankrupt 🤣

    • @archiewall124
      @archiewall124 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@joshuaw9675Todd boehly isn’t even in charge to any level at chelsea anymore. Keep up.

    • @bhumikjoshi4573
      @bhumikjoshi4573 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Man utd fans want competitive league now, they outspend everyone in Fergie era.

    • @raycarlbrown-amory3509
      @raycarlbrown-amory3509 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly

    • @sambog2635
      @sambog2635 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      wow genius, noone had thought about trying to spend money well 🤦‍♂️

  • @MoxyHQ
    @MoxyHQ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    Another half hour long podcast about City from the people who definitely 100% don’t care about City

    • @user-ze3rr9we4f
      @user-ze3rr9we4f 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They sued the prem what do u expect

    • @business3867
      @business3867 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      You misunderstanding caring about City and caring about them getting the punishment they deserve. Obviously the 3 time in a row winners and serial cheats will get attention but once they are gone no one will care.

    • @miniman2132
      @miniman2132 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobody cares about City. Everybody hates the Oil State husk that is currently using Manchester City’s skin to destroy the game that we love.

    • @user-zm3zj3hq3s
      @user-zm3zj3hq3s 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So only city fans can do this ?

    • @miniman2132
      @miniman2132 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@user-zm3zj3hq3s city fans are burying their head in the sand on this issue. Can you name any prominent fan that has had a serious conversation on this issue?

  • @JeremyBercow
    @JeremyBercow 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    PSG have money, Newcastle have money, Man utd have money…you still gotta go and do it on the pitch

    • @KisMiska10
      @KisMiska10 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      PSG before the purchase in 2011 last won Ligue 1 in 1994.
      Since then has won 10 (all but 3 years) of the domestic League, they also have won 10 Coupe de France.
      Though.....0 Champions League 😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣

    • @TomDeLaCruz
      @TomDeLaCruz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      money buys better players... but just paying loads fo avcerage players like what man utd did is why they look dumb now, and chelsea

    • @KisMiska10
      @KisMiska10 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TomDeLaCruz I thought we were talking about trophies, not (mostly) kickbacks on the transfer of players.

    • @drep9028
      @drep9028 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yup. They all shop at the same feeder clubs. It's what you do with the talent. ManU wouldn't know how to manage the talent at City anyway. ManU pipped City to Alexis Sanchez...I didn't worry lol. Pipped em to Mac Guire...I worried even less 😆. When they got casemiro and Varane I wasn't worried either... They could have gotten Carvajal too, still wouldn't get the best of him 😂

    • @Guyfaulkes1605
      @Guyfaulkes1605 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​​and Liverpool pipped united to gapko and nunez who ain't pulled up any trees have they , as for citeh they will be relegated cos they've sponsored themselves with over inflated sponsorship deals and cooked the books to cover the fact that their owner has even paid the majority of the Etisalat and etihad money 💰 in a shil company called adug , as for united managing talent they seem to be doing OK with players like garnatcho and mannoo , foden only youth player to have made it into citehs first team and become a regular

  • @raemongill19
    @raemongill19 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    The title of the clip doesn’t even matter on this channel anymore, all convos lead to Brian talking about Newcastle

    • @archiewall124
      @archiewall124 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Newcastle are extremely relevant in this discussion. Stop whining like a baby.

    • @raemongill19
      @raemongill19 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@archiewall124 are they relevant to every discussion over the last 20 videos

  • @nateleroux6462
    @nateleroux6462 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Brian when he makes a point: angry ‘let me finish my whole monologue!!’
    Other people making a point: Brian butting in halfway to make another monologue

    • @kurtsudheim825
      @kurtsudheim825 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I noticed that a while back, I hate hypocrites

  • @Chief24.7
    @Chief24.7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    Geordie really tries to inflate Newcastles importance 😅

    • @kevinhudson7555
      @kevinhudson7555 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      they are important

    • @wiseguy8705
      @wiseguy8705 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It’s so true. Every conversation he needs to bring up that club

    • @augment999
      @augment999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I mean say what you want about them but they're not exactly irrelevant in a conversation about premier league club big money takeovers are they

    • @jonathancampbell9133
      @jonathancampbell9133 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@augment999for this particular video, Newcastle are relevant. But they're irrelevant to most every other topic these guys talk about.
      It's hilarious how sycophantic all Brian's guests are now. Every one of them constantly talks up Newcastle just to stay on his show.

    • @stejonesuk
      @stejonesuk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are literally the reason the ruling was brought in 😂​@@wiseguy8705

  • @BiggestBirdonMars
    @BiggestBirdonMars 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    You know what this podcast is??
    A clown on Clown conversation😂😂
    This men spent 90% of season saying city and pep would fail this season and yet here we are

    • @DavidRegaL-lw5xz
      @DavidRegaL-lw5xz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Look at City combined 11 with every red title challengers in the 6/7 years. They dominate it with their players and overhype in the media only to always fail

  • @zaktaylor577
    @zaktaylor577 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    City need more than a points deduction if found guilty. They need to be relegated to the lowest division, transfer banned for a significant period and have their titles stripped. They should have to rise organically.

    • @ma466
      @ma466 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Too much pain and hatred. Wash your face with ur own golden shower 😅.

    • @Michael-tk9mx
      @Michael-tk9mx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      You sound butt hurt, did city winning the league hurt your feelings that badly?

    • @lenl860
      @lenl860 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Found the Liverpool or man united fan

    • @kurtsudheim825
      @kurtsudheim825 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A rangers, type situation, go down to non league (fifth tier)

    • @kurtsudheim825
      @kurtsudheim825 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Michael-tk9mx& you must be a man city fan. Literally n everyone hates them, yes, man u, lvpl & arsenal more, because they're the ones who've been hurt by it. If somebody kills your neighbours dog you aren't going to be as hurt if they'd ruin over yours, but are you still completely apathetic? Some people actually have morals

  • @peterferguson6285
    @peterferguson6285 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    CLEARLY Nobody Has Read The CAS Ruling 🙄

    • @BurnCKC
      @BurnCKC 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Everyone just ignores the bits they don't want to hear. No-one mentions that CAS already ruled that City didn't inflate sponsorship, but instead just focus on the time-barred charges that weren't even heard....as if City got away with it (spoiler, City would have been cleared of those too)

    • @jamiecharles8334
      @jamiecharles8334 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      People say city got off on a technicality with the time barred stuff (like Simon Jordan). What these people don’t realise is that city don’t even have to answer charges that are legitimate. It’s not as if they wriggled out, they didn’t even have a case to answer.

  • @TrapSection
    @TrapSection 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The arsenal fan is a certified waffler.

    • @eoslovestithonus
      @eoslovestithonus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe if Brian let him get a word in edgewise...

    • @PJAffiliate
      @PJAffiliate 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He is an absolute clown and has no idea what he talking about. In his deluded mind he thinks City are the reason Arsenal can't win the league and if we get relegated they will be champions lol. They couldn't dominate the PL with Henry in the team, I doubt they will with Havertz. Never even ever won the twice in a row. City live in his soft mind rent-free. Focus on your own failure of a team.

  • @Wackers_81
    @Wackers_81 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    This is the doorway to the SUPER LEAGUE they wanted .....why can't anyone see that

    • @SchnitzelCFC
      @SchnitzelCFC 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The Prem is already a super league. It allows relegation and promotion but otherwise it's not really different from the proposed Super League.

    • @jbo4547
      @jbo4547 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      False. The new format of the Champions league is essentially the Super League.

    • @gexcen
      @gexcen 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The problem is you can't have a super league with yourself or 2-3 other clubs 😂. City need the other elite teams good luck with that

    • @archiewall124
      @archiewall124 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jbo4547wrong. Absolutely, completely, idiotically wrong,

    • @KH-xv5gm
      @KH-xv5gm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Didn't the TOP 6 try to start a super league? Newcastle didn't agree to it! Tbh nufc don't want to buy their way to winning the league, just a chance to compete after 15 years of a owner who didn't spend. Half of our squad are still here from the previous owner.

  • @Mcfctreble23
    @Mcfctreble23 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Utd -Liverpool- arsenal are no longer guaranteed a top four place and all the champions league money. They have to try and put things back to how they used to be.

  • @BigDom61
    @BigDom61 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Man City will get a fine and Everton and Forest will lose points on behalf of of city 😂😂😂

  • @Demmy480
    @Demmy480 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Stupid convo. None of them even seem to understand the rule or what city are suing for.

  • @CovenantersfriendRTB
    @CovenantersfriendRTB 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is why you should research the topic you are about to talk about on a podcast

  • @Freddogod
    @Freddogod 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Money has almost nothing to do with a signing performing well, why can’t fans look at the poor recruitment of their own clubs rather than complaining about the rules not allowing them to spend a bottomless pit of money

  • @SamS-uv2ql
    @SamS-uv2ql 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    You guys need to educate yourselves. The rules being challenged didn't exist during the period of time the 115 charges cover.

    • @jackzeldon2883
      @jackzeldon2883 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why let Facts interfere w/ a good Cry🤣🤣🤣

    • @Evane120
      @Evane120 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great news! If u watch the video from start to finish they acknowledge that throughout. Hope this helps!

    • @SamS-uv2ql
      @SamS-uv2ql 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Evane120 no they don't. It is briefly touched upon, but then ignored and they go back to stupidly thinking they are linked.

    • @raabmujarrab8342
      @raabmujarrab8342 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Evane120they are completely disregarding it. The two time frames are completely different for the 2 cases.

    • @Evane120
      @Evane120 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SamS-uv2ql nope literally just watch start to finish it isn’t difficult

  • @Lawrence4000-s3k
    @Lawrence4000-s3k 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We do have a competitive league, though: 5 teams have won the title in the past 12 years. In the first 12 years only 3 teams won, with Utd getting 8 titles. It was largely a Utd/Arsenal duopoly until Chelsea arrived. PL income is higher than ever now and the game is more popular than ever. FFP is simply shooting ourselves in the foot against other leagues- let Newcastle, Villa, Everton, etc. spend what they like and have the best league in the world.

    • @bobdrooples
      @bobdrooples 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Utd had a youth team and transferred to professionalism sooner.
      Arsenal did it cheaply and were professional with Wenger, nutrition etc.
      Chelsea... money.

  • @EthanS95
    @EthanS95 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This chat literally proves that no matter what people say, all of their opinions on situations depend on if they benefit from it. If Newcastle hadn’t been taken over there is no way TG would have this opinion.

  • @jackwatkins795
    @jackwatkins795 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Acting like the odds aren’t 16/1 because loads of people have been betting on it which always lowers the odds 😂

  • @oliverian07
    @oliverian07 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It’s such a privilege to watch such highly trained financial experts, clearly they know exactly what they are talking about when it comes to city, you prat’s you actually know nothing about city’s situation other than what you have seen in the media

  • @bluemoontroy9647
    @bluemoontroy9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I am sorry lad's but you are talking bollocks

    • @jbo4547
      @jbo4547 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Be specific

    • @miniman2132
      @miniman2132 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jbo4547he won’t be. Nobody in City circles are actually having serious conversations about these issues. They are either banter accounts or they are burying their head in the sand.

    • @DavidRegaL-lw5xz
      @DavidRegaL-lw5xz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@miniman2132so we leave it for the clearly very objective red cartel fanbases to analyze it fairly😂

  • @Christina_Cage
    @Christina_Cage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This guy looking like a mix of HHH and Kratos from God Of War got me learning football better than the many years my ex bfs spent trying to get me to pay attention to what they were teaching me while they were watching games on tele LOL

  • @harryrobertson9838
    @harryrobertson9838 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Villa has a higher wage bill than Newcastle united......

  • @GermanChickenwing
    @GermanChickenwing 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Seeing the way Arsenal, Liverpool and Utd fans reaching about City, tells you really everything you need to know.. Can you imagine what the City board is going through in those pl clubs meeting? Just look at the rival fans online

    • @eoslovestithonus
      @eoslovestithonus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Boo hoo hoo...poor little City!🙄

    • @GermanChickenwing
      @GermanChickenwing 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@eoslovestithonus Thanks for proving my point

    • @louisbeerreviews8964
      @louisbeerreviews8964 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eoslovestithonusshut up kid

    • @louisbeerreviews8964
      @louisbeerreviews8964 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GermanChickenwingthat kid just a city hater

  • @somdutta7322
    @somdutta7322 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These guys have no idea about finances and fair competition rules. Pumping inflated money through “sponsorship” by companies owned by your parent company is not allowed in any business. It is wrong because it inflates the market for everyone else, and makes getting correct value from your legitimate sponsors difficult and problematic. The same thing happened with player valuations, when suddenly PSG, BARCA, City started paying 100 million for any tom dick and harry.

  • @Scarlett-rt7if
    @Scarlett-rt7if 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Everton and Forest on City side with APT= both docked points (literally a week later). No collusion though? Cartel needs disbanding.

  • @KMD-qj1qc
    @KMD-qj1qc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    anybody can press any amounts of legal charges they want against anyone it doesn’t mean anything, Arteta could press 115 charges against Arsenal tomorrow but non of them could be valid

  • @drep9028
    @drep9028 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you're a Brentford or Crystal palace...you can have concerns about not being able to spend to compete. If you're ManU, Chelsea, Arsenal et al....youve got enough money to keep your best players and sign lots more. The title races have been close quite often, Pep is just a generational manager, like Fergie and City are well managed by top businessmen n football people

  • @tomcrown9546
    @tomcrown9546 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hope city take these clowns to court for defamation after the verdict…

  • @ToeRagFC
    @ToeRagFC 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This isn't about 'small clubs spending to catch up'. This is about COUNTRIES owning football clubs to sportswash their reputations.
    The idea that COUNTRIES can own football clubs and have free reign to spend unlimited amounts of money is ridiculous!

  • @peptalk7658
    @peptalk7658 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They have no idea what the lawsuit is actually about. Geordie needs a new crew. Keep the tottenham fan. The rest are not good.

  • @scottfitzgerald3421
    @scottfitzgerald3421 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The system can only be fixed by putting a cap on the price of players.With all the stats that we see on a game to game basis, there should be some sort of algorithm were players last 3 seasons are taken into account(personal stats, cups won, personal achievements, leagues played in,ect ect) there should be a max cost of a player that has “potential” and ball park figures for players who’ve done “x” and no player stocks be above 80 mil unless you’ve won a champions league and a couple league in your 3 seasons… this would solve all problems in football.

  • @yorsp845
    @yorsp845 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this has to be the record of stupid opinions in a single podcast 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @lebinmohammed2116
    @lebinmohammed2116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s always hilarious when Chelsea fans think they are some historic club whereas their story is the same as city’s. 🤣

    • @danielainger
      @danielainger 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep 2005 was their first league title in 50 years, yet they act like they dominated English football.

  • @brianhall869
    @brianhall869 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    How much debt are Man Utd in??? Profit and sustainability hilarious

    • @dentonangus32
      @dentonangus32 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You don't understand the word sustainability

    • @TrapSection
      @TrapSection 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@dentonangus32 But i understand the word debt.

    • @Hedgebets100
      @Hedgebets100 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@TrapSection
      Good on you. Now learn about sustainability and you're in the big leagues.

    • @GermanChickenwing
      @GermanChickenwing 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@dentonangus32 If a company has debt of 1b means that company is not sustainable 😂😂

  • @brownchxpz
    @brownchxpz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It's crazy how they are talking about city and not talking about liverpool shirt sponsor Standard Chartered funding terrorists "allegedly" and True Geordie hating on man city for years yet still fuming that these rules have been brought in to stop the Saudi doing the samething with his side

    • @tetehbangura5654
      @tetehbangura5654 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Coz they are pussio … what do you expect from racist? The arsenal guy need to touch grass he been taking it from the back a lot

  • @kumarreaturaj9873
    @kumarreaturaj9873 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can see that clubs like Brighton, Bournemouth, Liverpool, Brentford are not moaning about this bullshit, because they have build their squad fairly & cheaply.

  • @michaelogbebor4582
    @michaelogbebor4582 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    well teams can do what chelsea is doing. stock pile on young talents to sell for double in the future to balance the books and keep sogning big names

  • @apurvsingh61
    @apurvsingh61 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    FFP rules are pure BS. Either implement a salary cap that is consistent across the board like the NBA or let clubs do whatever they want even if it means "twisting" the FA rules. Otherwise it's just about the "traditional" top 4 of Manchester United, Liverpoil, Arsenal and Chelsea.

    • @esiriokoro7976
      @esiriokoro7976 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The issue with a salary cap is that unlike the NBA the premier league isn’t a closed league.Players will just go where they are paid more

  • @stevenesbitt3528
    @stevenesbitt3528 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    FFP makes no sense, there was never a level playing field, why does it matter who invests and where?

    • @lenl860
      @lenl860 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      FFP or PSR does make sense as now we’re watching chelsea, united etc all have to sell players and actually try and spend money better than what they have been doing. And now they’re both dropping out of Europe and the top 4 is more competitive than ever

  • @2TenR
    @2TenR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is a difference between Liverpool and Manchester City, Liverpool have been challenging for titles since football got invented bar a few seasons. So thats why 60% more people watched Liverpool last game rather than City. Its not like Liverpool have just been bought out

    • @DavidRegaL-lw5xz
      @DavidRegaL-lw5xz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wrong again! City won a title before all of the top 6..lol

  • @j0fiz986
    @j0fiz986 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It kind of infuriates me football pundits talking about commercial law with no understand of it. Allow me to explain. The premier league creates its own form of contract that governs competition. They made these FFP rules. If the premier league hadn’t done that and football clubs ran like any other business, one large company could give money to another one of its affiliated companies via a company loan. The giving company can tell its shareholders it’s a good investment because it will earn a good return on that investment (interest) and the receiving company is honest with its shareholders that it received loan funds from an investor which are not genuine profits but it will use that money to invest in players and return the loan and more profits. That’s standard business. But because of FFP Manchester City decided to try and go around this by faking genuine investment in the form of advertising. The premier league found this out but it’s bigger than the premier league, this is a crime which can result in jail time, separate to anything to do with the premier league. The giving company lies to its shareholders that advertising funds were for genuine advertising. The receiving company lied to shareholders that the incoming money was genuine revenue when it wasn’t. Man City also cannot justify this hence why they know they will lose. Genuine investment of such a large number is managed by a team, that team looks at all available options at the time and makes a decision that makes sense for an outcome, increasing revenue. Man City at the time makes absolutely no sense as an investment when viewed at non arms length, they were the size of Millwall. The amount charged and paid made no sense and remember the prem can see sponsorship deals city had before and at the same time. No haggling or negotiating, the investor also having no track record of alternative investment strategies. City are fkd. Relegation is the least of their problems tbh.

    • @BiggestBirdonMars
      @BiggestBirdonMars 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You wrote so much bullocks😂😂😂😂

    • @j0fiz986
      @j0fiz986 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BiggestBirdonMars that’s not an intelligent response. A bot could write this on literally any comment on earth. Try using some brain cells

  • @pauldowney4280
    @pauldowney4280 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    City don't want Newcastle to not be able to compete, we want other clubs to be able to spend

  • @pauldry1677
    @pauldry1677 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    City recent domination is due to Pep not who our sponsorship is done by. After Pep the league will become more competitive. As it was before Pep

  • @jamesomara3361
    @jamesomara3361 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    'Waah waaah they can get top four but can go no further"
    What, because their club doesn't generate enough revenue to sustain that spending?
    These people had ZERO issues when Arsenal were having to sell our best players (to Man City) year after year to help fund our new stadium. We didn't skip a step to becoming this massive footballing entity. Now all I'm hearing from Newcastle and Villa fans is they want to skip these steps.

  • @mammal1988
    @mammal1988 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why does no one ever mention that uefa rules are more stringent, meaning that our rules become irrelevant if you want to be eligible for European football?
    Or am i missing something?

  • @johnrowland6144
    @johnrowland6144 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    if you have read the charges pl no chance city fighting for all small clubs dreams

  • @Sirwanks4lot
    @Sirwanks4lot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I’m liking true geordies energy this episode

  • @andywaterworth4570
    @andywaterworth4570 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is not about teams have a rich owner, its about an owner committing money laundering by over inflating a sponsorship deal. This is why everyone is selling their academy kids. The problem is someone like City could claim their sponsor is worth 5 Billion quid a season and never have to worry about FFP or whatever it is called now again.

    • @jackzeldon2883
      @jackzeldon2883 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No this is about Brown people buying the Wrong clubs......

    • @Bdbtg28691
      @Bdbtg28691 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@jackzeldon2883 British football sold out when they let in the Russian oligarch.

    • @drep9028
      @drep9028 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Bdbtg28691 they sold out when they let American owners in. The Glazer's not even fixing old Trafford leaky roof!

    • @andywaterworth4570
      @andywaterworth4570 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jackzeldon2883 it's got bugger all to do with race and everything to do with stopping 1 or 2 clubs cooking the books. That is what it will.turn into. Geordie even said it himself, he wants city to win the case and then Newcastle can spend whatever they want by having their bosses company sponsor the ground, shirts and anything else by massively over paying. City have brought this now to deflect, and funnily enough, could have to rebuild their squad in the next 12.months with a number of their players looking to leave. How many of that squad will stay if Coty get dumped to the Championship or worse?

  • @thembafreedom2463
    @thembafreedom2463 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You guys just scared that Mac city will win it again×5 don't worry this case will take years to finish just accept it that your team will always fight for top4 hold that Arsenal,man united,Liverpool fun

  • @chrismooney3715
    @chrismooney3715 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Correction. The emails can be used as evidence despite them being hacked. No time bar either. It’s not a court but charges of breaking Premier League rules governed by the Premier League.

  • @enkalon333
    @enkalon333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Guy in the pink who says City are a small club every week but is now saying they are the elite? These guys shouldn't even be commenting on this stuff they are so ill informed its crazy.

  • @samuelegu7888
    @samuelegu7888 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    so brians point is basically like saying he would allow the use of ped's by rich unfit people so they can win a gold medal like usain bolt rather than stop the use of that drug

  • @andrewturnbull8955
    @andrewturnbull8955 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Shouldn't 'sustainability' have something to do with managing the debts to the point where they're paid off? Should there be another Covid (or something with a similar impact) - based on the status as it is now the likes of Man U, Arsenal, Spurs and Liverpool could just get more loaded with debt, yet still be in line with PSR! The system is mad!

  • @joshuacharleston4425
    @joshuacharleston4425 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One ramification not mentioned here is the effect on the rest of the football pyramid. Football league clubs are obviously finding it hard enough as it is to retain their premier league status. If prem clubs were given free rein to spend however they like, newly promoted clubs would have no chance of competing.

    • @Duval-In-The-Wall
      @Duval-In-The-Wall 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Look at last season for the prime example. None of the promoted clubs had a prayer

  • @houstandy1009
    @houstandy1009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think Man City will win and should win as I think introducing rules to hold back certain clubs is against anti-competition law.
    Any owner should have the right to invest as much money as they like into their club to increase it's growth. The other clubs ganging together acting in self interest to impede that growth I think should be and is illegal.
    It would be like if to sell groceries you had to be part of the grocers union, Morrisons are worried about the growth of Aldi so they propose a union rule if you have less than X stores you can't open more then 2 a year. Tesco and Sainsbury's think great idea and vote for it, and all the corner shops vote for it as well as they don't want to open more than two stores, and its in their self interest to cut the chances of Aldi opening a store next to them.
    As the EPL members vote their own rules in they will only ever vote in self interest not in the interest of fairness, that goes for all our clubs. They should not be able to bring laws in that are against the law of the land. If City win and the rule is found to be illegal, it gets changed, if they lose and the rule is found to be legal then it stays, simple as that I don't see the issue.
    Also this case has no bearing on the 115 charges regardless of how it goes.

    • @esiriokoro7976
      @esiriokoro7976 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What happens when the owner leaves?Who pays all the debt?

  • @themarkedman72
    @themarkedman72 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brian at the 22.30 mark: Newcastle cant win by merit or compete through merit so let us cheat. There it is.

  • @ammarahmedd
    @ammarahmedd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    City should be liquified and banned from english football, set a standard

  • @MrJsonvig
    @MrJsonvig 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a stupid conversation, Gone are the days where we all just enjoyed football for the talents...

  • @pauldowney4280
    @pauldowney4280 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Utd, Liverpool and arsenal don't want Newcastle City and villa, Chelsea to be able to spend money, it's because then they would have to spend to compete, that's means they can't take money out, city have never taken a penny out of football

  • @danielainger
    @danielainger 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “They bought Newcastle to have fun” 😂😂😂😂 he can’t be serious. Amanda Staveley said in an interview that Newcastle was cheap to buy hence why they bought them.

  • @Huncholini
    @Huncholini 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People crying about a guy called True GEORDIE talking about Newcastle (his team) on his podcast is mental. That's like saying why does AFTV talk constantly about Arsenal or Goldbridge about United 😂

  • @puffin7285
    @puffin7285 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Their reaction points to two things potentially. 1) They believe the inquiry is going towards finding them guilty and 2) They also believe the PL is looking to actually punish them beyond a slap on the wrist.

  • @sim-ej3xn
    @sim-ej3xn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How is the premier league dying? Look at the viewership numbers. More people are watching the premiere league then ever before. The facts and stats reflect that.

  • @jensgardetun5629
    @jensgardetun5629 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Correction, Aston villas annual wages are £117m, Newcastle United's are £84m. So NUFC have 70% of Villa's wage bill.

  • @amohammed5699
    @amohammed5699 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jacob spot on with this. Keep everyone focused on the main issue at hand. City must be punished for this

  • @sameersheriff7078
    @sameersheriff7078 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mancity is by for if not the best team in the world right now so why would epl want to relegate them and shoot themselves on the foot ????
    Its not happening guys !!! don't have false hopes

  • @prasannabalaji1886
    @prasannabalaji1886 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gunner here... We also sold our best players for more than a decade to pay off the debt and we are a big 6 big 4 big 3

  • @davidgreen4288
    @davidgreen4288 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As an Arsenal fan i think any owner should be able to put money into a club with a cap on the amount they can per season, as long as they club remains protected from any chance of going bankrupt. I would suggest 100m per season.

  • @dresantorini1770
    @dresantorini1770 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If this rules changed a smaller pl league team will never her above 10th ever again

  • @QuickTokens
    @QuickTokens 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    get something on your mic that stops me hearing you inhale every 2 seconds

  • @arnabroy832
    @arnabroy832 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    EPL already made Antony 90M player and IF City wins then what next? 150M for Antony like players?

  • @pauldowney4280
    @pauldowney4280 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you're clubs are in debt then they should have to clear the debt before they can spend on transfers, if you have no debt then you can invest in your club problem solved.

  • @pauldowney4280
    @pauldowney4280 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You should be thankful to city for standing up to the yanks, Newcastle haven't got the guts to do it

  • @SuperKinlo
    @SuperKinlo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please give them a monster pay deductions as that will be Leicester and Man City down.
    And as an Ipswich fan it gives us a great opportunity to stay up.

  • @ArchieSimpson-s8e
    @ArchieSimpson-s8e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s stupid if Nike want to give 100 million to Burnley for example a year then that’s what they value it. If Man City’s sponsors are owned by their owners it’s not properly valued. Would they have sponsored another team for taht much money? No

    • @Sketch2805Studios
      @Sketch2805Studios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Half the companies that sponsored them didn't exist prior to sponsoring city and had no staff ,no offices and did nothing lol they we just p.o boxes and then city also allegedly pumped money into other sponsors to inflate sponsorship and paid under the table secret payments to players ,agents and coaching staff to entice them

  • @richardj2216
    @richardj2216 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can anyone throw any light on the State owned Saudi Telecom funding Man Utd?

  • @kristian5831
    @kristian5831 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The rules were in place to ensure every club would have a lot of homegrown talent.
    If you look at the top clubs in the league each one maybe has 3-5 brilliant homegrown players and the rest are further down the table.

  • @anthonybevan2912
    @anthonybevan2912 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The Premier League also included within the new rules that you can’t do business with your associated clubs - Another discrimination against City and similar clubs.

    • @miniman2132
      @miniman2132 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      To call that discrimination is to actively cheapen other matters of real discrimination. This has nothing to do with discriminating against people from other parts of the world, this is about protecting the integrity of the game by stamping out /corruption/.

    • @Jammon23
      @Jammon23 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Imagine that, buying Mbappe for 200mil for a club in an unknown league then sell him for 1mil to the parent club.

    • @R.Mousasi
      @R.Mousasi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you are supporting record club transfers like Savio going to troyes and Nuamah going to Molenbeek. And then those players never playing a minute for these clubs? Molenbeek spent 25 million euro just to loan that player straight to Lyon. It's fucking bullshit.

    • @GermanChickenwing
      @GermanChickenwing 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@R.MousasiNo 1 is doing that right now

    • @Duval-In-The-Wall
      @Duval-In-The-Wall 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fantastic, multi-club ownership is a plague

  • @sim-ej3xn
    @sim-ej3xn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The banks don’t make any money from Newcastle or city.

  • @tomasj788
    @tomasj788 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To get the PL more fair, what about a London tax, an heritage tax etc. Not sure Assna and Manu would like that 😂

    • @les57
      @les57 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who are assna and manu ?

  • @andymcdermott3171
    @andymcdermott3171 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How many times is going to court

  • @QuickTokens
    @QuickTokens 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    lets play a game who can shout over everyone else

  • @themarkedman72
    @themarkedman72 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Geordie "How can Newcastle cheat" end.

  • @paulbee2812
    @paulbee2812 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    City have hurt a lot of feelings. All because of money.

  • @Duval-In-The-Wall
    @Duval-In-The-Wall 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If True Geordie is on City’s side, then he completely forfeits the right to complain about 115 or their success
    Absolute hypocrisy

  • @kyleswarbrick2012
    @kyleswarbrick2012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tg literally twirking for city is sensational. He called the league boring when klopp finished 2nd by a point but now newcastle are bought out, he's defending city. Pure victim merchant

  • @Jamesbaker123
    @Jamesbaker123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The idea behind legislation is sound but the application has been rushed and isn't right. In the past, going back to the 90s for example, we didn't have state owned clubs or owners so rich they could buy an entire state. We had to adapt to these changes and that's a fact. Is it a bit unfair in some instances yes but it would also be unfair to allow these mega owners to run rampant and make a joke out of the league.

  • @Bigvariant
    @Bigvariant 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brian is too attached to his own self interests to see what is right. The rules are there so if your sugardaddy decides to leave you and pulls his money out, that your club then doesn't go bankrupt. That is the only reason the rules are there. Spend what you actually have

  • @handlemchandleton3255
    @handlemchandleton3255 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    True geordie seriously cant be going after city since his team was essentially setting themselves up to do the same thing. He also loves mentioning man uniteds spend when we actully earn our money from the fans.

  • @awesome8uk405
    @awesome8uk405 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe one day u will get people that actually know what they are talking about.

  • @Wolf-1211
    @Wolf-1211 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:30 the point proven. If city actually get away with this is teams like Newcastle and Everton can follow in the corruption is bonkers

  • @aslv1999
    @aslv1999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man said "Abu Derby" 😂🤔