Mark Solms ~ Active Inference Insights 017 ~ Affect, Consciousness, Dreams

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.พ. 2025
  • It’s more consciousness-talk on today’s episode of Active Inference Insights, as Darius discusses affective states, dreams, interoception and much more with psychoanalyst and neuropsychologist Professor Mark Solms.
    Mark Solms
    neuroscience.u...
    scholar.google...
    ma...
    "The Hidden Spring: A Journey to the Source of Consciousness"
    "The Brain and the Inner World: An Introduction to the Neuroscience of the Subjective Experience"
    Darius Parvizi-Wayne
    / dparviziwayne
    www.researchga...
    Active Inference Insititute
    www.activeinfe...
    / inferenceactive

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @silviopina_111
    @silviopina_111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    YAY!!! Don't know how I missed this Solms one, but found it now! 🎉

  • @alexandrazachary.musician
    @alexandrazachary.musician 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks so much Darius ❤️🙏🏽. I love Mark Solms and I totally love where the dual-aspect monism is going!!! Spinoza would be happy 😁. Finally after so much sloshing about in physicalism… not you… but many. ❤️❤️❤️

  • @bellakrinkle9381
    @bellakrinkle9381 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Apologies, I'm rather focused on Fairbaign's object relations theory lately. I'll return another time.
    It's great to see Dr. Solms doing new interviews. I subscribed.

  • @TechyBen
    @TechyBen 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    30:00 is the explanation! The two "Mark Solms" both consider themselves "the same" but have some value difference *and are aware of that difference*. As that difference is some "value" not measured in the system *but between it's states*, it's a "feeling", because it can classify it, detect it, effect it, the thing "exists", but it cannot be observed directly, it's subjective! :D

    • @rockapedra1130
      @rockapedra1130 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can u flesh this out a bit? I'm not sure what u mean by it being "the explanation". Explanation of what? Not the Hard Problem, right?

    • @TechyBen
      @TechyBen 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rockapedra1130 The self is the system that can detect changes in self. To do so, it's a feeling, because there is no external measurement for it, as an external system is detecting changes of other states, self is detecting changes of it's own state.

    • @rockapedra1130
      @rockapedra1130 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TechyBenah, ok. So it's more of an explanation of the definition of "feeling". Not an explanation of how a feeling can come to manifest itself subjectively to begin with, right?

    • @TechyBen
      @TechyBen 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rockapedra1130 Those are words. Things are what we (as existing things) classify.
      If we classify something it is. What the complexity around this is, is "math" a thing that "physics/matter" is not.
      We exist, I'm not worried about the mechanism and if it's made of matter, or made of the arrangement or function of matter.
      Self classification seems to be a thing that exists, and that classification can be listed against other classifications, and we consider that a "feeling" (feeling hungry vs not, happy vs sad etc).

    • @TechyBen
      @TechyBen 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rockapedra1130 (It can come to manifestation via the mechanisms that allow for self classification.
      Sensations of our senses, thinking from our brain, social behaviours, etc. Mechanistically or socially, biologically or mentally)

  • @davedouglass438
    @davedouglass438 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Would it be useful to restore SURPRISE/STARTLE into ongoing discussion of the core affects, as in Silvan Tomkins' work?
    At minimum, this would allow a differentiation between Karll Friston's usage of 'surprise' (or surprisal) from Tomkins" ideas.

  • @joanmoloney8188
    @joanmoloney8188 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    think the 'hard problem' might mutate to delayed or absence of feeling in order to prioratise awareness of need .the hard problem of Affect.love Mr Solms.

  • @davedouglass438
    @davedouglass438 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Solms/Feldman Barrett discussion
    Pt 1: th-cam.com/video/9yEPHUKyBOM/w-d-xo.html
    Pt 2: th-cam.com/video/Ni3cIhn4xb4/w-d-xo.html

  • @rockapedra1130
    @rockapedra1130 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    44:47 i like how the interviewer does not let himself get derailed away from the Hard problem. Solms has a lot of great ideas which i find fascinating but they don't quite penetrate into the Hard Problem imho. If I'm understanding Solms' stance correctly, he appears to treat subjectivity as an axiom? "Subjective feelings exist because they do. Things are dual, don't know why. Now let's talk about about how feelings are used." I don't think Solms is saying he has solved the Hard Problem, right? He just wants to talk about details and consequences AFTER the Miracle of subjectivity.

    • @AnneNicholson-yy5ro
      @AnneNicholson-yy5ro 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Take a look at the chapter in Solms’ book Hidden Spring where he addresses the hard problem

    • @rockapedra1130
      @rockapedra1130 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AnneNicholson-yy5ro thanks. Will do.

  • @_ARCATEC_
    @_ARCATEC_ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Subjective Perspective of a Conscious Organism
    •X(s zPc q(o ) ZC ( O)Q zpc S)Y•
    Extended Homeostatic Driver
    •Xe h(s z q(δ E)Z(e ∆)Q z S)H eY•
    Subjective Conscious Feeling
    •X (s zc Fq() ZC ()Qf zc S) Y•

    • @rockapedra1130
      @rockapedra1130 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ah ... U mean
      xxd dwfgr 56;65 fvhhev + 3?

    • @_ARCATEC_
      @_ARCATEC_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rockapedra1130 Nope

  • @betel1345
    @betel1345 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'd love to see Lisa Feldman Barrett on here!

  • @AnneNicholson-yy5ro
    @AnneNicholson-yy5ro 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The video with Lisa was actually quite dull. She doesn’t understand anything Mark is talking about.