@@MuttFitness He was the evil one all along. And we just got the good Don back. Does it mean that his evil plan, to build a huge neutrino gun and shoot the Earth with it is cancelled?
I have two comments. 1 - You're the only person I've listened to who had managed to say super-duper whilst actually talking about something serious. A true skill. 2 - What happened to your moustache? I lied, I have a third comment. Thanks for helping people like me understand what people like you are doing, it's great.
Don, you are one of my favorite channels on TH-cam. Your uncanny ability to explain complex things clearly, your manner of presentation and quirky sense of humor are amazing. I eagerly await each next episode. I studied engineering and did 3 years each of math, chemistry and physics although I have been working as a business consultant for the last 25 years.. I did some nuclear physics at college but clearly not enough and oddly it was a chemistry lecturer who mentioned quarks in passing one day 45 years ago. I clearly remember the day but did not give it much thought again until recently. After a chance visited to Turkey in 2019 I was amazed at the ancient Roman architecture that is to be found there. During the COVID break I had time and started to watch more about ancient history, which also led to cosmology and of course sub-atomic particle physics. Out of curiosity I wanted to know more about "quarks" and quickly discovered a 'new world' Seeing the standard model for the first time recently made me realize just how much has happened since my college days. From the very first episode of yours that I saw I subscribed because I immediately recognized that you had something special. And the similarity between the infinite small and infinitely large are fascinating even if not completely predictable after the fact. Applying quantum physics to understand biology is also truly a fascinating topic e.g. bird navigation and the consciousness of human minds So thanks for your effort to help make these topics understandable, compelling and "entertaining".
This is another liberal waste of money... The Few trying to run before we can afford to walk properly, as a species.. Wasting so much money, brains and natural resource... PrivateSi's Most Unfortunate Law: The uselessness of a Big State Science Project to 99.999999% of the world's population is proportional to its size and cost... It's a Nazti curve too, with many useless, expensive uber-projects that tax payers don't get to vote on directly.
@@benhall2146 .. To make a good point that you cannot refute because it's blatantly true... How will this knowledge (if actually true) help, practically speaking again? As a down to Earth guy? Who funds it? What choice did they have in the matter?
@@PrivateSi people said the same thing about radio astronomy but the only reason Internet is possible is because of the advances in radio astronomy.thanks them instead of rubbish criticism
Dr Don is back! It's been soooo long - the notification that there is a new Fermilab video literally made my day. :) Also, the VFX in this episode are a real step up, the person responsible for the editing did a great job!
It would be mundane until he goes off on a tangent explaining how the combined uncertainty of the atoms and their constituent parts mean that the door is open and closed simultaneously. Further extrapolation of which will show how the door is everywhere all the time, including how it becomes a portal to anywhere and anywhen in the multiverse as a result. Someone/something will then knock on the example, free standing door he is using, from the other side, causing him to freeze up, unwilling to answer the phantom knock.
How about how the s on the end of 'door works' disappeared and all the misinterpretations could change the presentation and any experiments involved. ;-)
Glad to see you're back at Fermilab with your videos Dr Don (More Please). I'm also glad to see that 'someone' finally decided (realized?) that you Physicists are "Essential Workers".
J just ran across it as a physics major working in an engineering job for almost 25 years. Made me aware of the beauty and significance of physics again. Thank you 👍
It's great to join the university and get a degree 🎓. Like I can't imagine a doctor prescribe therapy for cancer without knowing what a gene or chromosome is.
This is another liberal waste of money... The Few trying to run before we can afford to walk properly, as a species.. Wasting so much money, brains and natural resource... PrivateSi's Most Unfortunate Law: The uselessness of a Big State Science Project to 99.999999% of the world's population is proportional to its size and cost... It's a Nazti curve too, with many useless, expensive uber-projects that tax payers don't get to vote on directly.
"We're not 100% sure that dark matter exists" - thank you for setting the record straight! I've seen so many people accepting dark matter as a fact when we just don't know.
@@benjystrauss2524 If you ask 1000 scientists if they think dark matter exists, 997 will say it does. But you are probably correct. I may be lowballing a bit.
@@cloudpoint0 What you are thinking of is sigma significance, not what individual scientists think is true, but how confident we can be in the discovery. 99.7% is a very high ball, as it would mean that dark matter has been verified to 3 sigma, which is not the case: this would have been absolutely massive news. Either way though, I really want to see your source.
@@benjystrauss2524 Three represents the few scientific nutcases that think 26.8% of the universe’s energy is not a fact in spite of multiple lines of evidence that can measure and detect it. It doesn’t mean the detail nature of dark matter is known but its group effect and existence is without doubt. This is at least a three sigma conclusion. I’m sure dark matter made lots of headlines when it was discovered by Fritz Zwicky in 1933. I think Dr. Don is just saying an actual particle has not been found to associate with dark matter. He cares about this because he is a particle guy. Dark matter could be something other than a particle although there isn’t really another sensible alternative that hasn’t already been ruled out. But we know dark matter of some kind exists. It isn’t remarkable to think that it is a particle somewhat similar to a neutrino, otherwise known as the ghost particle. Or do you doubt that neutrinos exist too since they can only be detected when moving at near light speed? Cold dark matter moves slowly so detection is not possible in this way. Why are you so opposed to reality? Is dark matter against your religion? i.stack.imgur.com/IhWZK.jpg
This is a high-risk experiment. An all-or-nothing proposition. With a *TREMENDOUS* potential, if successful. Glad to see you are willing to go out on a limb, in search of great things. *Do Great Things!* 👍
There once was a lady named Bright, Whose speed was much faster than light. She went out one day, And in a relative way, She returned the previous night!
nope not really ,you are in closed environment with no way out and with a growing population and a decreasing amount of ressources ! and no matter what you wont break the speed of light making any hope of stellar exploration highly unlikely at least by biological humans !
@@nHans me nothing but the fact is at some point people will have to understand you cant sustain an economy by making babies to pay the debts and the bills...
Oh man, Don looks so much more healthy and happy in this episode! I'm really glad to see that, because most science comunicators that I follow on youtube got really depressed in the videos after the pandemic.
Small note : De Broglie is a tricky surname that is not pronounced as written (at all). Even French people have a hard time with it as, the way it's said, they would write it "De Breuil" if they dif not know how it's spelled. I'm French and I was in my twenties when I learned about it. This wikipedia page has the correct pronounciation in audio : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Broglie
Here's the thing about the pronunciation of names: It's not absolute. Names are pronounced according to the language and region of the _speaker,_ not necessarily the native way a person would have pronounced their own name. I've lived and worked in Asia, Western Europe, and North America. I can tell you from my own experience that everybody mangles foreign names, even the French. When I joked to my American colleagues how the Europeans mangled my name, they said I wasn't alone. Their own English names had been mangled as well. My colleague Howard told me that when he visited Paris, the French called him "Owaar," and when he told them it was like the aviator Hughes, they said "Oog" 😂 In general, there's no one "correct" way to pronounce a name. • Two people with the same name may pronounce it differently if they're from different languages, cultures, or regions. • Let alone two different people. The same person might pronounce their own name differently in different regions. For example, a lot of people who emigrated to America Americanized their names, _including Einstein, Von Neumann, Antonin Dvorak, and Vito Corleone!_ 😁 That's the price De Broglie pays for international fame; the price Howard and I pay for the privilege of traveling internationally in this multicultural, multilinguistic world. It's not done maliciously, so I don't get worked up about it. Neither should you. Coming to the way Dr. Lincoln pronounces foreign names. (Foreign to him, that is, non-American names.) In general, if you have to pronounce a name-any name-would you say it like a native, or the way your target audience expects it? From a practical point of view-unless you're specifically teaching them how to pronounce names-I say the latter. You're trying to get across a message, and you don't want them to get side-tracked. So it's not just names-you should also use _their_ units of measurement, sports, and pop-culture references. That's exactly what Dr. Lincoln is doing. As an American working in America and speaking in American English, his primary target is a non-technical American audience. He definitely knows that the American pronunciations of foreign names is different from foreign (native) pronunciations. It's not difficult for him or his research team to dig up the native pronunciation. But he deliberately uses the American pronunciation-it's the reason I've mentioned earlier. _And it's not wrong!_ It's the culturally accepted practice everywhere. His pronunciation would be considered wrong if and only if (1) It was not the commonly accepted pronunciation in his language, region, and target audience, _and_ (2) it was not the native pronunciation either. A broader, international audience is expected to understand that. So, yeah, it's futile to call out speakers because they don't pronounce words the way you do: • If they're confident of the pronunciation, it's because that's how they've heard it being pronounced, and they expect the audience to understand whom they're talking about. Dr. Lincoln falls in this category. Remember, this is not an extemporaneous talk. It's a planned production-it has been scripted, rehearsed, recorded, and edited before being published. If he or his producers were doubtful of the pronunciation, they'd have re-recorded that part and edited it in. Fermi Lab has the resources to do it! • Otherwise they already know that they don't know the "correct" pronunciation. They still need to move on with the rest of the talk, so they do the best they can, hoping that the audience will understand. They may hesitate, they may stumble, they may apologize for their pronunciation-it's really up to the speakers' individual style. For the listeners, the key is to not miss the forest for the trees.
@@nHans I'm certainly not worked up about it. The way it's spelled and the way it's said is so different that there's even actual jokes about it in France. The only purpose of my message was to convey information, just so, for exemple,people know that when they hear someone say "de brogli" said as written or something like "de broyle" it's the same guy. There's no point in blaming someone for there pronounciation of foreign names and that was not my intent in any way.
I could listen to Dr Lincoln read even the most boring things in the universe, shipping forecasts, and be entertained, but when he talks physics, even I get excited.
If these 'scientists' didnt spend their careers building expensive toys they would probably be building weapons of mass destruction. Its safer to have them just doing maths and stuff and publishing BS papers.
I propose that you create a Q&A website for physics. I know multiple sites are out there, but they are inefficient for the public. You are great at explaining things.
Amazing video as always! As a physics dropout and electrical engineer (software integration focus) in the making; I always love to keep up to date with the actual physical laws of the world and more often than not end up wondering: "How could we build something to test that", or "How could we use that knowledge to develop new sensors for robots to navigate the world" Thanks a lot for the informative videos, and keep up the dad jokes; they make everything better!
@@MrElvis1971 Your reply displays much uncertainty. It screams for a response to probe whether it shall collapse all its fringes into a singular point mass or remain beyond the event horizon of the observables.
Speaking of observables, last night I went to look at the sunset. I was looking at the horizon and noticed the king of the birds, a Hawk. It was amazing to see the Hawk King at the horizon. It was eventful.
I went to see the LIGO facility in Washington State just after they had achieved "lock" with their instrument. They hadn't detected anything yet. It just meant that it worked. The lecture that day was as mind expanding as these Fermilab videos. But Don's lecture today has me wondering about the medium thru which a gravity wave propagates. Is spacetime the medium or would dark matter be the medium that a gravity wave travels thru?
I need explanation in terms of the waves canceling out. Isn’t a wave made out of energy? If they cancel out, where does that energy go? Does it just disappear?
I used to live close to fermi lab! they hosted a robotics club i attended in 1980's. I also got to see the target open in the tunnel ( had miles of wires pouring out for each detector) with the son of the engineer who built and held patents on the magnet track designs!
Welcome back. Trying still to understand u. But u good educator. So, have to watch this video a couple of times to get it thru my thick head. Anyway welcome back.
Photons, just like atoms or electrons, are neither particles nor waves. They're photons. But they have characteristics of both particles and waves. Also: the cat is not really both alive and dead at the same time, but to describe it we need to consider both things in our equations so it's true mathematically, if not practically.
When someone mentioned that they would think that if dark matter exists that it would be bunched up possibly at Lagrange points like L1 and L2, or the core's of very dense objects. That almost makes me visualize magnetic fields, how plasma form's, and intense density layers interacting with the space of the universe around it. It all makes me feel like our equations or our amounts we put into our equations are just off and that we just have a lot more to learn about the things we already know about, like deeper layers of complexity to gravity, electromagnetism, density, temperature differences, radiation, etc. Etc. And maybe how all these things can interact on immense scales and immense complexity of combinations in the scale of entire galaxies, multiple galaxies interacting, clusters of galaxies interacting with other clusters of galaxies interacting, and so on and so forth.. Who knows. I'm just hypothetically discussing an idea and totally open to being completely wrong. It's just fun to stay curious.
I'm not sure I understood everything but I do like the project. Good job. I even like the concept of beginning small(-ish) before jumping to large sizes in the detector, it makes so much sense!
Fantastic. How did you make me think I understood something so incredibly complicated. Whether or not it finds Dark Matter the gravitational waves detections would be amazing.
The gravitational flux through any closed surface is proportional to the enclosed mass and is reverberated by the acceleration of the mass to a equilibrium, as every action has an equal and opposite reaction to maintain stability in time and space. the reverberation absorption coefficient of the gravitational flux explains how the accelerated mass can absorb sound energy, mirroring the effect that created it.
One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind moment there in the making if this detects dark matter and it's basically a shoe in for detecting gravitational waves. Maaaaaad! Nicely done lads! I approve of your dedication. It's time to take a look into the super freakin' small waves! I mean who knows what understanding dark matter will unlock. Just as we didn't know what quantum mechanics would unlock and well look how well that field of human study has taken off.
I have pondered if dark matter is a collection of elementary particles having a different mix to conventional matter? 1. particle that causes electromagnetic attraction is missing. 2. particle that causes gravity is present. 3. particle that accepts photon's and re-emits photon's not present. Have the experts had a good look at this idea or the like? Or am I simply not understanding elementary particles?
Keeping Fermi Lab on the cutting edge of research is a source of pride for local science enthusiasts, thanks!
For science enthusiasts all around the globe!
@@rael_gc ha ha Let's prove it's a globe first before you get too excited
@@johnkean6852 oh dear. Moving on.
@@johnkean6852 Go touch some grass.
Not only local scientists! Canadian scientists too!
"we cant be sure if mustache is there until we observe it, but once we observe we change its location and momentum" tom sellect
tom select * from table students
@@sasavukelic :)
@@sasavukelic 😂😂😂
Actually the best proof of Tom Selleck’s mustache is its gravitational pull on hot chicks.
Maybe we should invest in a detector to find out? Measure it's waveform and force it through a pair of slits.
Congrats to Fermilab on 0.5M+ subscriptions! I've been loving all the lectures and video series on this channel!
The mustache wave function collapsed!
ooohnoooooo, it's like Michael @vsauce without a beard
Apparently that cat is not alive. The wave function has collapsed, and the mustache is dead:D
@@juzoli Don's mustache is/was a cat. Confirmed.
Maybe this is Don from a parallel universe. Where instead of being evil, he just has no mustache.
@@MuttFitness He was the evil one all along. And we just got the good Don back.
Does it mean that his evil plan, to build a huge neutrino gun and shoot the Earth with it is cancelled?
Dr Lincoln is back! Good to see you, sir. 👍
I have two comments.
1 - You're the only person I've listened to who had managed to say super-duper whilst actually talking about something serious. A true skill.
2 - What happened to your moustache?
I lied, I have a third comment. Thanks for helping people like me understand what people like you are doing, it's great.
Don, you are one of my favorite channels on TH-cam.
Your uncanny ability to explain complex things clearly, your manner of presentation and quirky sense of humor are amazing.
I eagerly await each next episode.
I studied engineering and did 3 years each of math, chemistry and physics although I have been working as a business consultant for the last 25 years..
I did some nuclear physics at college but clearly not enough and oddly it was a chemistry lecturer who mentioned quarks in passing one day 45 years ago.
I clearly remember the day but did not give it much thought again until recently.
After a chance visited to Turkey in 2019 I was amazed at the ancient Roman architecture that is to be found there.
During the COVID break I had time and started to watch more about ancient history, which also led to cosmology and of course sub-atomic particle physics.
Out of curiosity I wanted to know more about "quarks" and quickly discovered a 'new world'
Seeing the standard model for the first time recently made me realize just how much has happened since my college days.
From the very first episode of yours that I saw I subscribed because I immediately recognized that you had something special.
And the similarity between the infinite small and infinitely large are fascinating even if not completely predictable after the fact.
Applying quantum physics to understand biology is also truly a fascinating topic e.g. bird navigation and the consciousness of human minds
So thanks for your effort to help make these topics understandable, compelling and "entertaining".
Fermilab deserves much more funding and Dr Don deserves a raise. 💕 ☮ 🌎 🌌
This is another liberal waste of money... The Few trying to run before we can afford to walk properly, as a species.. Wasting so much money, brains and natural resource...
PrivateSi's Most Unfortunate Law: The uselessness of a Big State Science Project to 99.999999% of the world's population is proportional to its size and cost...
It's a Nazti curve too, with many useless, expensive uber-projects that tax payers don't get to vote on directly.
Then why is privatesi "wasting" its time watching this?
@@benhall2146 .. To make a good point that you cannot refute because it's blatantly true... How will this knowledge (if actually true) help, practically speaking again? As a down to Earth guy? Who funds it? What choice did they have in the matter?
@@benhall2146 because you cant know the validity of a data set until you watch it !
@@PrivateSi people said the same thing about radio astronomy but the only reason Internet is possible is because of the advances in radio astronomy.thanks them instead of rubbish criticism
Dr Don is back! It's been soooo long - the notification that there is a new Fermilab video literally made my day. :)
Also, the VFX in this episode are a real step up, the person responsible for the editing did a great job!
Every 50-100 years our minds are blown away by new information. I refuse to believe that we grasp '' the bigger picture'' just yet. Great video!
For April fool's could you please make a video like this explaining something extremely mundane, like how a door work? Thanks
It would be mundane until he goes off on a tangent explaining how the combined uncertainty of the atoms and their constituent parts mean that the door is open and closed simultaneously. Further extrapolation of which will show how the door is everywhere all the time, including how it becomes a portal to anywhere and anywhen in the multiverse as a result. Someone/something will then knock on the example, free standing door he is using, from the other side, causing him to freeze up, unwilling to answer the phantom knock.
No no, that's top secret. Even American presidents don't know they work!
How about how the s on the end of 'door works' disappeared and all the misinterpretations could change the presentation and any experiments involved. ;-)
It's mundane until you bring statics into the mix.
Yay! Don's back!
Glad to see you're back at Fermilab with your videos Dr Don (More Please). I'm also glad to see that 'someone' finally decided (realized?) that you Physicists are "Essential Workers".
Great video Dr. Don! However, I was wondering when you are bringing back "Subatomic Stories"? 🤔🤔👍👍
J just ran across it as a physics major working in an engineering job for almost 25 years.
Made me aware of the beauty and significance of physics again.
Thank you 👍
I'm extremely interested in all things physics and extremely infantile in my understanding. Thank you for "dumbing it down" for me!
It's great to join the university and get a degree 🎓.
Like I can't imagine a doctor prescribe therapy for cancer without knowing what a gene or chromosome is.
theoria apophasis has very interesting things for you on his TH-cam channel! I would check it out.
Just find the Quantum Duck for me, that is where all the quarks come from.
This is another liberal waste of money... The Few trying to run before we can afford to walk properly, as a species.. Wasting so much money, brains and natural resource...
PrivateSi's Most Unfortunate Law: The uselessness of a Big State Science Project to 99.999999% of the world's population is proportional to its size and cost...
It's a Nazti curve too, with many useless, expensive uber-projects that tax payers don't get to vote on directly.
I highly recommend PBS Space Time. They do a great job at explaining complex physics with visual aides and minimal jargon.
This is such a great channel. Thank you Dr. Don. You should have way more than 505k subscribers!
Tell all your friends and enemies.
Probably the MAGIS-1000 will be able to detect the missing mustache. We have to wait
You get extra points for good audio.
So many drop the ball regarding good audio reception/presentation.
"We're not 100% sure that dark matter exists" - thank you for setting the record straight! I've seen so many people accepting dark matter as a fact when we just don't know.
Yes, we should be precise in science and say we are 99.7% sure that dark matter exists. There's always some remote possibility we are wrong.
@@cloudpoint0 Where are you getting that number from? It sounds a bit off.
@@benjystrauss2524 If you ask 1000 scientists if they think dark matter exists, 997 will say it does. But you are probably correct. I may be lowballing a bit.
@@cloudpoint0 What you are thinking of is sigma significance, not what individual scientists think is true, but how confident we can be in the discovery. 99.7% is a very high ball, as it would mean that dark matter has been verified to 3 sigma, which is not the case: this would have been absolutely massive news. Either way though, I really want to see your source.
@@benjystrauss2524
Three represents the few scientific nutcases that think 26.8% of the universe’s energy is not a fact in spite of multiple lines of evidence that can measure and detect it. It doesn’t mean the detail nature of dark matter is known but its group effect and existence is without doubt. This is at least a three sigma conclusion.
I’m sure dark matter made lots of headlines when it was discovered by Fritz Zwicky in 1933. I think Dr. Don is just saying an actual particle has not been found to associate with dark matter. He cares about this because he is a particle guy.
Dark matter could be something other than a particle although there isn’t really another sensible alternative that hasn’t already been ruled out. But we know dark matter of some kind exists. It isn’t remarkable to think that it is a particle somewhat similar to a neutrino, otherwise known as the ghost particle. Or do you doubt that neutrinos exist too since they can only be detected when moving at near light speed? Cold dark matter moves slowly so detection is not possible in this way.
Why are you so opposed to reality? Is dark matter against your religion?
i.stack.imgur.com/IhWZK.jpg
This is a high-risk experiment. An all-or-nothing proposition. With a *TREMENDOUS* potential, if successful.
Glad to see you are willing to go out on a limb, in search of great things.
*Do Great Things!* 👍
What a time to be alive! I am pumped for Dune and this has me just as excited.
Dune has nothing to do with physic !
“They wait until they’re measured before they choose a state”
Uh huh. Riiiiiiight. This is straight up hand-waving
Not gonna lie, I kinda miss the bookshelf...
(And it is a good informational video, I just sometimes get stuck on the visual things)
I'm sure Dr. Don will go back to that format at some point.
I miss the moustache :-(
@@Nihilicious83 Never been a big mustache fan, so I can let that go. But the books gave things a more comfortable aesthetic.
@@Nihilicious83 Have you ever heard of Schrodinger's mustache?
Dr. Lincoln is just the best... And so humble, too.
There once was a lady named Bright,
Whose speed was much faster than light.
She went out one day,
And in a relative way,
She returned the previous night!
Thank you for explaining things so well. Your videos should be in all High School & Colleges.
I had to rewatch because the first time through I was literally too distracted from lack of mustache.
Professor Lincoln is back, great. I've been waiting for more if your videos. Safe to day I wasn't the only one.
Mustache is now made of axions. Dark matter confirmed.
he looks 20 years younger
Mustachions.
@@JDSleeper Then no moustache ever in any future video.
Your program may be the most important driver in exciting young people about physics and science.
just came by to say don lincoln is great, and that physics is everything.
I love your videos. I’ve been binging them all day. Please keep them coming. You make this stuff understandable for the average person
0:00 One of? It's by far the best!
If you really read the comments, I would like to thank you for making these videos, I enjoy them a lot. You give me hope for humanity!
You're welcome.
Future is promising. Thank you for letting us know!
nope not really ,you are in closed environment with no way out and with a growing population and a decreasing amount of ressources ! and no matter what you wont break the speed of light making any hope of stellar exploration highly unlikely at least by biological humans !
@@calgar42k Thank you for the parachute. What are you inventing next?
@@nHans me nothing but the fact is at some point people will have to understand you cant sustain an economy by making babies to pay the debts and the bills...
As always, Dr. Lincoln, it is a pleasure watching these videos. thank you.
i love your hand movements
Great Video, Fantastic teacher. Came back to watch another vid after having been recommended this channel by TH-cam.
i am having a dream of joining either Fermilab or CERN after completing my PhD in theoritical physics
👍hope you succeed
@@desiderata8811 thanks for the motivation!!
Best of luck
@@chillychese thanks a lot
Abhijit? What kind of name is that?🤔🤔🤔. You cant be a physicist with that name...🤣🤣
Thanks Don. There was much I did not get in this one. I'll watch again.
Oh man, Don looks so much more healthy and happy in this episode! I'm really glad to see that, because most science comunicators that I follow on youtube got really depressed in the videos after the pandemic.
I was paying attention.. Yet this stands only as a comment to endorse the spectacular opening and closing cards! Bravo!
No books on Cleopatra.... But... Don't Forget! Uli's Goodbye cake! 2:30 p.m.
Good to see you back in front of the board!
I love physics and your keen fashion, Prof. Thank you for making physics seems easy to understand 😊
Small note : De Broglie is a tricky surname that is not pronounced as written (at all).
Even French people have a hard time with it as, the way it's said, they would write it "De Breuil" if they dif not know how it's spelled.
I'm French and I was in my twenties when I learned about it.
This wikipedia page has the correct pronounciation in audio : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Broglie
In English the closest spelling might be de Broil or maybe duh Broyle.
Here's the thing about the pronunciation of names: It's not absolute. Names are pronounced according to the language and region of the _speaker,_ not necessarily the native way a person would have pronounced their own name.
I've lived and worked in Asia, Western Europe, and North America. I can tell you from my own experience that everybody mangles foreign names, even the French. When I joked to my American colleagues how the Europeans mangled my name, they said I wasn't alone. Their own English names had been mangled as well. My colleague Howard told me that when he visited Paris, the French called him "Owaar," and when he told them it was like the aviator Hughes, they said "Oog" 😂
In general, there's no one "correct" way to pronounce a name.
• Two people with the same name may pronounce it differently if they're from different languages, cultures, or regions.
• Let alone two different people. The same person might pronounce their own name differently in different regions. For example, a lot of people who emigrated to America Americanized their names, _including Einstein, Von Neumann, Antonin Dvorak, and Vito Corleone!_ 😁
That's the price De Broglie pays for international fame; the price Howard and I pay for the privilege of traveling internationally in this multicultural, multilinguistic world.
It's not done maliciously, so I don't get worked up about it. Neither should you.
Coming to the way Dr. Lincoln pronounces foreign names. (Foreign to him, that is, non-American names.)
In general, if you have to pronounce a name-any name-would you say it like a native, or the way your target audience expects it? From a practical point of view-unless you're specifically teaching them how to pronounce names-I say the latter. You're trying to get across a message, and you don't want them to get side-tracked. So it's not just names-you should also use _their_ units of measurement, sports, and pop-culture references.
That's exactly what Dr. Lincoln is doing. As an American working in America and speaking in American English, his primary target is a non-technical American audience. He definitely knows that the American pronunciations of foreign names is different from foreign (native) pronunciations. It's not difficult for him or his research team to dig up the native pronunciation. But he deliberately uses the American pronunciation-it's the reason I've mentioned earlier. _And it's not wrong!_ It's the culturally accepted practice everywhere.
His pronunciation would be considered wrong if and only if (1) It was not the commonly accepted pronunciation in his language, region, and target audience, _and_ (2) it was not the native pronunciation either.
A broader, international audience is expected to understand that.
So, yeah, it's futile to call out speakers because they don't pronounce words the way you do:
• If they're confident of the pronunciation, it's because that's how they've heard it being pronounced, and they expect the audience to understand whom they're talking about. Dr. Lincoln falls in this category. Remember, this is not an extemporaneous talk. It's a planned production-it has been scripted, rehearsed, recorded, and edited before being published. If he or his producers were doubtful of the pronunciation, they'd have re-recorded that part and edited it in. Fermi Lab has the resources to do it!
• Otherwise they already know that they don't know the "correct" pronunciation. They still need to move on with the rest of the talk, so they do the best they can, hoping that the audience will understand. They may hesitate, they may stumble, they may apologize for their pronunciation-it's really up to the speakers' individual style. For the listeners, the key is to not miss the forest for the trees.
@@nHans I'm certainly not worked up about it. The way it's spelled and the way it's said is so different that there's even actual jokes about it in France. The only purpose of my message was to convey information, just so, for exemple,people know that when they hear someone say "de brogli" said as written or something like "de broyle" it's the same guy.
There's no point in blaming someone for there pronounciation of foreign names and that was not my intent in any way.
Physics is so amazing. I'm very thankful for your work and efforts to bring that down to the public. Please, keep on for us!
I grow a mustache, Don gets rid of his. Thanos approves.
I could listen to Dr Lincoln read even the most boring things in the universe, shipping forecasts, and be entertained, but when he talks physics, even I get excited.
Its astounding how humans are capable of building these machines
If these 'scientists' didnt spend their careers building expensive toys they would probably be building weapons of mass destruction. Its safer to have them just doing maths and stuff and publishing BS papers.
@@fivish WMDs are more fun to play with.
I propose that you create a Q&A website for physics. I know multiple sites are out there, but they are inefficient for the public. You are great at explaining things.
Thanku sir for this video.
Amazing video as always!
As a physics dropout and electrical engineer (software integration focus) in the making; I always love to keep up to date with the actual physical laws of the world and more often than not end up wondering: "How could we build something to test that", or "How could we use that knowledge to develop new sensors for robots to navigate the world"
Thanks a lot for the informative videos, and keep up the dad jokes; they make everything better!
I'm here mainly for dad jokes. Physics is just gravy.
I don't think it is appropriate to make dad jokes within this context. I seriously think you don't understand the gravity of the situation.
@@MrElvis1971 Your reply displays much uncertainty. It screams for a response to probe whether it shall collapse all its fringes into a singular point mass or remain beyond the event horizon of the observables.
Speaking of observables, last night I went to look at the sunset. I was looking at the horizon and noticed the king of the birds, a Hawk. It was amazing to see the Hawk King at the horizon. It was eventful.
I went to see the LIGO facility in Washington State just after they had achieved "lock" with their instrument. They hadn't detected anything yet. It just meant that it worked. The lecture that day was as mind expanding as these Fermilab videos. But Don's lecture today has me wondering about the medium thru which a gravity wave propagates. Is spacetime the medium or would dark matter be the medium that a gravity wave travels thru?
Spacetime distortion
I have a feeling the true purpose of this experiment is to look for Weakly Interacting Mustache Particles.
:D
👍"So, let's get started". Welcome back, Dr. Don.! Missed you.
The more we discover, the less we know! 🤯
I only know that i know nothing. So i guess if i try to learn something i end up with negative knowledge , if the more i discover the less i know...
The more we know, the more unknown unknowns become known unknowns.
It's turtles all the way down.
He's back!! Oh boy do I love these videos.
Who is this guy? sounds familiar.
He sells "smart pills" on Infomercials
Fantastic stuff! Can't wait till MAGIS - 100 is up and running!
Wow Don without moustache! what a twist!
I wondered how long a comment on that would take. 29 seconds is the answer.
It's still there in spirit
@@donlincoln1961 man feels so weird seeing him without the moustache
It takes minutes off your age.
Excited for you and the MAGIS team, Don!
Sabin hossenfelder has a lecture coming on TH-cam titled "Is Dark matter real" 😂, Don got his reply to it quite early.
Has she? A new one because she made a video about dark matter a while ago. She doesn’t think it’s real.
@@pansepot1490 she posted this link on her channels community tab th-cam.com/video/fa7t7sLNffo/w-d-xo.html
@@pansepot1490 it’s not real
Glad to have you back.
I'll tell you what Dark Matter really is: A tool for people who are unable to say, "I don't know."
I need explanation in terms of the waves canceling out. Isn’t a wave made out of energy? If they cancel out, where does that energy go? Does it just disappear?
🙏 Namaste
2:59 Is there ANY vibration which isn't made of small units? Sound is vibrating air molecule, the surf is vibrating water molecules, etc.... right?
Another great explanation from Dr Don and I have to agree that Kirsty's videos are well worth watching
This is beautiful stuff here. Amazing what humanity can accomplish. I also like the new intro.
Dear Don: Great to see you again. take care rick
Dr. Don is back! 🙏🙏
Dr.Don is back to rock on!!
Hey Dr. Don! Good to see you again!
Awesome. Amaizing ideas and experiments . Keep it up Fermilab , and keep These videos coming, they are a gem for us physics fans.
Your channel is one of my favourites ❤❤
1:19 Actually, what's making the single wave stay whitin the boundaries?
In another way, what's it bouncing of at the top and the bottom?
Nice video! Missed you, great to see you back! 🙏
Good to see Dr Lincoln! Nice new intro you guys
I flew into Chicago O’Hare frequently and the arrival took us right by Fermilab. It’s a very large facility!
I used to live close to fermi lab! they hosted a robotics club i attended in 1980's. I also got to see the target open in the tunnel ( had miles of wires pouring out for each detector) with the son of the engineer who built and held patents on the magnet track designs!
Wow it seems like super cutting edge experimental physics, I am mind blown 🤯
Finally, someone asking the right questions.
welcome back Doctor Don!
Welcome back. Trying still to understand u. But u good educator. So, have to watch this video a couple of times to get it thru my thick head. Anyway welcome back.
Photons, just like atoms or electrons, are neither particles nor waves. They're photons. But they have characteristics of both particles and waves. Also: the cat is not really both alive and dead at the same time, but to describe it we need to consider both things in our equations so it's true mathematically, if not practically.
Awesome, I'm excited about the future of gravitational wave astronomy!
When someone mentioned that they would think that if dark matter exists that it would be bunched up possibly at Lagrange points like L1 and L2, or the core's of very dense objects. That almost makes me visualize magnetic fields, how plasma form's, and intense density layers interacting with the space of the universe around it. It all makes me feel like our equations or our amounts we put into our equations are just off and that we just have a lot more to learn about the things we already know about, like deeper layers of complexity to gravity, electromagnetism, density, temperature differences, radiation, etc. Etc. And maybe how all these things can interact on immense scales and immense complexity of combinations in the scale of entire galaxies, multiple galaxies interacting, clusters of galaxies interacting with other clusters of galaxies interacting, and so on and so forth.. Who knows. I'm just hypothetically discussing an idea and totally open to being completely wrong. It's just fun to stay curious.
I'm not sure I understood everything but I do like the project. Good job. I even like the concept of beginning small(-ish) before jumping to large sizes in the detector, it makes so much sense!
Yay Dr Lincoln is back.
Fantastic. How did you make me think I understood something so incredibly complicated. Whether or not it finds Dark Matter the gravitational waves detections would be amazing.
Awesome MAGIS-100 experiments! I wish you all success and discover more about dark matter!
The gravitational flux through any
closed surface is proportional to the
enclosed mass and is reverberated
by the acceleration of the mass to a
equilibrium, as every action has an
equal and opposite reaction to
maintain stability in time and space.
the reverberation absorption
coefficient of the gravitational flux
explains how the accelerated mass
can absorb sound energy, mirroring
the effect that created it.
Dr Don Lincoln, I like this - I subscribed and I shared it! ....thank you ....
duuuuuuuuuuude! good to see you again!
Wow! 6.4e5 subscribers! Keep up the good work Fermilab!
One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind moment there in the making if this detects dark matter and it's basically a shoe in for detecting gravitational waves. Maaaaaad! Nicely done lads! I approve of your dedication. It's time to take a look into the super freakin' small waves! I mean who knows what understanding dark matter will unlock. Just as we didn't know what quantum mechanics would unlock and well look how well that field of human study has taken off.
I love hearing about contemporary experiments. Thanks for the peek.
Even Bananas is great! Thank you Dr. Don
I have pondered if dark matter is a collection of elementary particles having a different mix to conventional matter? 1. particle that causes electromagnetic attraction is missing. 2. particle that causes gravity is present. 3. particle that accepts photon's and re-emits photon's not present. Have the experts had a good look at this idea or the like? Or am I simply not understanding elementary particles?