Defender for servers is by far the most difficult to comprehend comparing to all other plans combined. I think that Tom is the only person in the world that understands all possible combinations of plans and agents.
For integrated vulnerability assessments. Does Defender for endpoint gives the same results then installling the Qualys agent? So If you have MDE installed you don't need the Qualys agent?
"Any machine connected to the log analytics workspace via Log Analytics agent will incur a charge when Defender for Servers Plan 2 is enabled on the workspace" Is this true that this happens only for Log Analytics agent, not when using Arc and AMA? That would be good if so, since this cost issue is a big problem when unifying log management and Defender for Servers, for example when having a shared workspace between Defender for Cloud and Sentinel.
Defender for servers is by far the most difficult to comprehend comparing to all other plans combined. I think that Tom is the only person in the world that understands all possible combinations of plans and agents.
can you share active vs passive mode related project plan
Is there a more up to date version of this video?
Do we with Defender for Servers has the application lockdown - all of Australia says yes because of the Essential 8.
For integrated vulnerability assessments. Does Defender for endpoint gives the same results then installling the Qualys agent? So If you have MDE installed you don't need the Qualys agent?
Will defender for servers P2 do automated remediation even without the monitoring agents?
explain very well thanks for clarifying simply
Do you have its ppt as well ?
How can I calculate daily usage of defender for cloud log ingestion to chose plan2 over 1 if required
What is the best way to disable the auto provisioning of the MDE Agent? But you would like to have the MDE integration enabled?
You can’t, but I would believe that agentless capabilities are something that they would look at after the summer.
"Any machine connected to the log analytics workspace via Log Analytics agent will incur a charge when Defender for Servers Plan 2 is enabled on the workspace"
Is this true that this happens only for Log Analytics agent, not when using Arc and AMA?
That would be good if so, since this cost issue is a big problem when unifying log management and Defender for Servers, for example when having a shared workspace between Defender for Cloud and Sentinel.
Correct. With Azure Monitor Agent, Defender for Servers billing is based on the subscription, only.
This could have been a 20' video. Too much talk without saying anything of value. He did hit all the buzzwords, though.