Great to see the focus on error rates and quantum volume, rather than just qubit counts! The road to full error corrected quantum computers may be long and difficult, but it should be interesting.
So nice to know all this when, despite my best efforts, I have no idea how a quantum computer works... It apparently isn't possible to explain how a single calculation would work using laymen's terms. I've watched many, many videos and I still have yet to find one that helps me understand how a quantum computer works in a way that is anywhere comparable to what is out there for classical computers. DOS is no exception but the analogy of 2 waves on the ocean has been the closest one yet. What needs to be done is a forensic examination of a single calculation that explains why superposition would/could be helpful (in my humble opinion).
Quantum computers will never replace "classical" computers for the vast majority of tasks. Quantum computing will be used (if successful) in software that does "simulations" where no precise answer is possible (nor needed), such as weather forecasting, simulating a nuclear reaction, etc. These are now done on super-computers (which area basically a huge number of smaller computers working in parallel), mainly for scientific and military applications. The reason why this is called quantum computing is because, like quantum mechanics (which deals with description of the physical properties of at the scale of atoms and subatomic particles), it deals with the PROBABILITIES of how things work, or where particles are located, and not the precise physics of Newton, Einstein, and others who did classical mechanics. So quantum mechanics does not replace classical mechanics, they just operate at different scales. classical
@@mark9118 never is too long. Today quantum do not replace classical. Quantum computing is like a nuclear weapon, it is so powerful that is a national security issue and it is very restricted and regulated to they layman. It will remain like this for long time. There is nothing like quantum in classical 1-superposition 2-Entanglement 3-interference , that means quantum is exponentially paralell computing, billion , trillion times faster to whatever can be parallelized which is most of computing . If error correction solved.
@@Josefinocchio My contention is that quantum computing will not replace classical computing, for the same reason that quantum mechanics (physics) will not replace classical mechanics. They are dealing with two different things (as I explained previously quantum mechanics only deals with atomic or sub-atomic particles), so it is not just a matter of "catching up." Besides, if you present your credit card for payment, the computer transactions generated do not require (nor can they benefit from) parallel processing, since they only require a few very short transactions with limited amounts of data. As an IT application developer, I have developed both transaction systems (like credit card authorization) and also decision support/analytics systems with huge databases using parallel processing (using a lot of conventional computers linked together) and I know the difference between these types of applications and what kind of processing they require. Even within parallel processing systems, there is a difference between a simulation where one is computing probabilities (suitable for quantum computers), and where one is computing to achieve precise processing of data (not suitable for quantum computing).
Awesome - looked for such a video comparison since years now. I did some internet search myself - but it's tedious to find data and things to compare. Thanks for mentioning the upcoming metrics - that gives a pointer for future comparisons.
Science is important to spread and i often offer Recommendations, but today i wanna do it a bit differently and try to bring-in People to watch 'some More News', a Satire-Version of corrupt and biased News-Channel. Just like Scientists bring Attention to Climate-Change and such Issues, that TH-camr bringts Attention to Homelessness and various other Issues. Unbiased and informed, his Talks about 'Obvious Solutions to Obvious Problems' are a Masterpiece.
I enjoyed this video. HOORAY! But seriously, thank you for helping me to escape the misery of the production factory floor for a quarter hour. It was very humanising ♡
Someone who talks about QC that actually knows what the hell he is talking about! Thank you! I'm so glad you mention that qubit count isn't super effective as a full measure. I'm a bit skeptical of quantum volume because it is built by IBM to make their superconducting play look more effective than it is. I think we need a metric which requires error correction as part of the circuit. I also think it would be nice to have a metric that looks forward at possible scalability (because most architectures have scalability roadblocks that they haven't solved). Superconducting bits tend to perform well in small scales, but they have a lower ceiling than trapped ions or neutral atoms (to my knowledge)
It's worth noting that Quantum Annealing is targeted at a very specific kind of problem. In some formulation it's called Ising Problem (bits take values -1 and 1) or QUBO (bits take values -1 and 1). Essentially they amount to minimizing a quadratic polynomial over a huge number of binary variables. These can be NP-Hard, but translating typical integer optimization problems as commonly found in industry and making Quantum Annealers useful is non-trivial. With annealers, there's four metrics to target: 1. Maximal Problem Size (I.e. how many variables can be used) 2. Solution Quality : Given one relaxation (problem solving attempt) how close can one get to an optimal solution 3. Solution probability: How likely is it, that one relaxation produces a close to optimal solution. 4. Connectivity: How many Interactions between variables one can have. DWave has issues with the last point whereas optical circuits are not limited there. I believe DWave was quite smart by focusing on these to avoid competition and have a useful product ready early, even if it's not the ideal quantum computer.
Thanks for the video. Very insightful, specifically interesting how you explain the not yet well developed industry standards on how to compare quantum computers. I'll be much better prepared to interpret news releases on the topic now.
4:33 is wrong. The 127 qubit machine by IBM (Washington) has a QV of 64 (although when it first went up it was listed at 32). The 128 QV machines by IBM are usually 27 qubits.
Quantinuum is listed in the quantum VOLUME slide, but no mention of the company in the Future Predicitions slide. No explanation why? IBM seems to be the most open about it all, at least publishing the most, which is usually an indication of being the furtherest along becasue they have enough people and progress to say something intelligent.
I have seen a lot of quantum computer videos but I have yet to see a quantum computer in action, loading a program, executing it and reading the output. Am I missing something?
I think the "missing something" is expecting a quantum computer to do the same thing as a regular computer. I'm certainly not an expert, but I think the basic idea of a quantum computer is that it can find the solution to a very specific problem countless times faster than a regular computer, so if a regular computer feeds the quantum part a problem, and then measures the output after the "quantum stuff" is done, the whole thing has executed a program (not the quantum computer on its own).
@@Takyodor2 I am not expecting the quantum computer to do the same as a regular pc. I am talking about showing the simple process of inputing data, processing and reading output. I want to see how it's done on a quantum computer. The actual program doesn't matter.
Liked this overview. Would be interesting where the military companies such as Lockheed Martin stands by today. From your video, I assume you didn’t find any information then. From other videos, I learned that they are investing money in this field.
Archer, a deep technology company (ASX: AXE) has successfully developed and patented a quantum computing processor chip (CQ chip) that works at room temperature which is a groundbreaking achievement.
So, if we're able to get a decently working quantum computer by the end of this decade... what can they do? WIll they always be used for very specific calculations like supercomputer projects are, or are we going to see consumer grade quantum GPUs or quantum smartphones in like 30-40 years?
I think this all depends on the question if it is possible to get the Qbits physically stable without the need of much correction like cooling or high power lasers. If we don't, the size and power consumption of the quantum processor would be too high for any home application.
I think quantum computing is going to follow in the footsteps of fusion power. Its going to be X years away for a very very long time, perhaps forever. I hope I am wrong 🙂
There's high incentive to get Quantum computers sooner rather than later. Specially since they'll break encryption to steal tons of classified info and tons of Bitcoins
No Quantum is a prerequisite for stabilizing fusion. That is the issue. Technology has to be strategically performed in proper sequence. Regardless, Fusion never had the intensity of funding and research in applications which QC has recently. IONQ, Honeywell and the US Army have been able to achieve 99.9% accuracy with barium ions. The discoveries in QC being made now are fundamental and simply need scalability. The basics have all been solved.
The difference is that this has private funding with real progress already. Even at a snail pace they will reach more qubits, while Fusion isn't getting any real funding because it doesn't have the same opportunities.
very good effort to make this video . i love your topics and approch to explain ,its always satisfies my mind curosities because i am always searching similar topics .a big 👏from me
😰WOOOOOW the best chanel ever 👋🏻hi am the new member from 🇲🇦am just lerin the English but I understand every thing, I like this chaine . Thank you for all .
So why is it called Quantum Volume when it is calculated using only two dimensions? 🤔 One would think that it would be a measure of Quantum Area. Is this just a poorly throughout convention or am I misunderstanding something?
I made a 6.7 million qubit quantum computer in my garage and let it run for 20 minutes, I went and made lunch and when I came back into the garage there were 2 electromagnetic sparkly human type beings fighting each other. The being that had a DARPA uniform on was beating the other sparkly beings ass and it ended up destroying my quantum computer in the process of the beat down. It then turned to me and said “understand” before disappearing into a heatwave... I haven’t built another one since then.
Hey, great channel. Would love to buy some of your posters. Is there any way to buy them in the UK? Can only find US based delivery on the platforms you have advertised.
this would be a great yearly series.
セルム
Eh, yo. _Pin_ this.
@@ivoryas1696 Agreed
@@ivoryas1696 uhi 0n
Agreed
Then it would have to happen 25 days after this comment, which would be awesome.
Great to see the focus on error rates and quantum volume, rather than just qubit counts!
The road to full error corrected quantum computers may be long and difficult, but it should be interesting.
my brain is the best quantum computer cause human can make a quantum computer
@@masternobody1896 ..l
@@masternobody1896 brain best quantum computer up to now... to be continued
@@masternobody1896
What do you mean?
Gotta' lose the Nasa garb brah if you want to be objective!
I just got a job at Quantinuum, thought I would brush up on my quantum computing knowledge. This is awesome!
Sales/Biz side?
@@GodofStories No, r&d side!
hi who's the leader in quantum computers right now?
Just wanting to support you while you’re taking care of yourself.
Hey Robert, thanks so much, that's very kind of you. I really appreciate it :)
Awesome seeing Qiskit being mentioned, since that's the team I work at.
hi who's the leader in quantum computers right now?
So nice to know all this when, despite my best efforts, I have no idea how a quantum computer works... It apparently isn't possible to explain how a single calculation would work using laymen's terms. I've watched many, many videos and I still have yet to find one that helps me understand how a quantum computer works in a way that is anywhere comparable to what is out there for classical computers. DOS is no exception but the analogy of 2 waves on the ocean has been the closest one yet. What needs to be done is a forensic examination of a single calculation that explains why superposition would/could be helpful (in my humble opinion).
Blake I suggest the book of Carlo Rovelli - Helgoland. In my oppion it is a good start to better understand and accept quantum mechanics.
@@Josefinocchio Wonderful, I'll put it on the list for future reading. Thank you.
Quantum computers will never replace "classical" computers for the vast majority of tasks. Quantum computing will be used (if successful) in software that does "simulations" where no precise answer is possible (nor needed), such as weather forecasting, simulating a nuclear reaction, etc. These are now done on super-computers (which area basically a huge number of smaller computers working in parallel), mainly for scientific and military applications.
The reason why this is called quantum computing is because, like quantum mechanics (which deals with description of the physical properties of at the scale of atoms and subatomic particles), it deals with the PROBABILITIES of how things work, or where particles are located, and not the precise physics of Newton, Einstein, and others who did classical mechanics. So quantum mechanics does not replace classical mechanics, they just operate at different scales. classical
@@mark9118 never is too long. Today quantum do not replace classical. Quantum computing is like a nuclear weapon, it is so powerful that is a national security issue and it is very restricted and regulated to they layman. It will remain like this for long time. There is nothing like quantum in classical 1-superposition 2-Entanglement 3-interference , that means quantum is exponentially paralell computing, billion , trillion times faster to whatever can be parallelized which is most of computing . If error correction solved.
@@Josefinocchio My contention is that quantum computing will not replace classical computing, for the same reason that quantum mechanics (physics) will not replace classical mechanics. They are dealing with two different things (as I explained previously quantum mechanics only deals with atomic or sub-atomic particles), so it is not just a matter of "catching up."
Besides, if you present your credit card for payment, the computer transactions generated do not require (nor can they benefit from) parallel processing, since they only require a few very short transactions with limited amounts of data. As an IT application developer, I have developed both transaction systems (like credit card authorization) and also decision support/analytics systems with huge databases using parallel processing (using a lot of conventional computers linked together) and I know the difference between these types of applications and what kind of processing they require.
Even within parallel processing systems, there is a difference between a simulation where one is computing probabilities (suitable for quantum computers), and where one is computing to achieve precise processing of data (not suitable for quantum computing).
Awesome - looked for such a video comparison since years now. I did some internet search myself - but it's tedious to find data and things to compare.
Thanks for mentioning the upcoming metrics - that gives a pointer for future comparisons.
Amazing, I’ve try to understand better the question of R&D in QC and you showed up on YT to give me all answers to my questions, thank you so much !!
A fascinating review of the state-of- the-art! Thank you, and I look forward to future updates!
Science is important to spread and i often offer Recommendations,
but today i wanna do it a bit differently and try to bring-in People to watch 'some More News',
a Satire-Version of corrupt and biased News-Channel.
Just like Scientists bring Attention to Climate-Change and such Issues,
that TH-camr bringts Attention to Homelessness and various other Issues.
Unbiased and informed, his Talks about 'Obvious Solutions to Obvious Problems' are a Masterpiece.
I enjoyed this video. HOORAY! But seriously, thank you for helping me to escape the misery of the production factory floor for a quarter hour. It was very humanising ♡
Good video and loved the part where you used the meme concept 😂
Bro are you from India?
@@sivakumar-vn7ex are you too?😁
@@PMA_ReginaldBoscoG Yes bro i am from Tamil Nadu, India
Someone who talks about QC that actually knows what the hell he is talking about! Thank you!
I'm so glad you mention that qubit count isn't super effective as a full measure.
I'm a bit skeptical of quantum volume because it is built by IBM to make their superconducting play look more effective than it is.
I think we need a metric which requires error correction as part of the circuit.
I also think it would be nice to have a metric that looks forward at possible scalability (because most architectures have scalability roadblocks that they haven't solved). Superconducting bits tend to perform well in small scales, but they have a lower ceiling than trapped ions or neutral atoms (to my knowledge)
It's worth noting that Quantum Annealing is targeted at a very specific kind of problem.
In some formulation it's called Ising Problem (bits take values -1 and 1) or QUBO (bits take values -1 and 1). Essentially they amount to minimizing a quadratic polynomial over a huge number of binary variables.
These can be NP-Hard, but translating typical integer optimization problems as commonly found in industry and making Quantum Annealers useful is non-trivial.
With annealers, there's four metrics to target: 1. Maximal Problem Size (I.e. how many variables can be used) 2. Solution Quality : Given one relaxation (problem solving attempt) how close can one get to an optimal solution
3. Solution probability: How likely is it, that one relaxation produces a close to optimal solution. 4. Connectivity: How many Interactions between variables one can have.
DWave has issues with the last point whereas optical circuits are not limited there.
I believe DWave was quite smart by focusing on these to avoid competition and have a useful product ready early, even if it's not the ideal quantum computer.
Short and useful.
Liked it very much.
Thanks for the video. Very insightful, specifically interesting how you explain the not yet well developed industry standards on how to compare quantum computers. I'll be much better prepared to interpret news releases on the topic now.
Your channel is one of my favorites ❤
I howled seeing that you used a sequence of Vince McMahon photos to indicate the progressive scale of the issues to be solved.
Yeah it really put things into perspective lol
Excellent report
you are so cool! I've only watched a couple of your videos but I like how you organize and present information.
Would you be open to conducting an analogous analysis on the state of the art in Neuromorphic computing?
I actually love you and your channel
4:33 is wrong. The 127 qubit machine by IBM (Washington) has a QV of 64 (although when it first went up it was listed at 32). The 128 QV machines by IBM are usually 27 qubits.
It would be nice if these companies could collaborate together for the sake of humanity combining their different approaches
It would be nice if all of these companies would stop researching quantum for the sake of humanity
No competition, no point
@@reedsexton3973why?
Tbf, they are almost all running in entirely different directions even thise that seem similar on the surface.
really interesting video! can you do an updated version?
Hello, sir.You are one of my conquest find on youtube.Hat's off to your enormous effort🖐️
Excellent video. You are wonderfully talented. Oscar for science visual facilitation
Quantinuum is listed in the quantum VOLUME slide, but no mention of the company in the Future Predicitions slide. No explanation why? IBM seems to be the most open about it all, at least publishing the most, which is usually an indication of being the furtherest along becasue they have enough people and progress to say something intelligent.
I think this channel would help to think from first principles of what so many scientists historically told in ancient times
What software you use to create these maps? And how you animate them? Is there any video you have created for behind the scenes for your process?
PowerPoint
Paintbrush 🖌
Ionq and ibm hit their goals for the year, the 25 algorithmic qubits and 433 physical qubits
congrats on 1 mil subs!
I have seen a lot of quantum computer videos but I have yet to see a quantum computer in action, loading a program, executing it and reading the output. Am I missing something?
I think the "missing something" is expecting a quantum computer to do the same thing as a regular computer. I'm certainly not an expert, but I think the basic idea of a quantum computer is that it can find the solution to a very specific problem countless times faster than a regular computer, so if a regular computer feeds the quantum part a problem, and then measures the output after the "quantum stuff" is done, the whole thing has executed a program (not the quantum computer on its own).
@@Takyodor2 I am not expecting the quantum computer to do the same as a regular pc. I am talking about showing the simple process of inputing data, processing and reading output. I want to see how it's done on a quantum computer. The actual program doesn't matter.
Liked this overview. Would be interesting where the military companies such as Lockheed Martin stands by today.
From your video, I assume you didn’t find any information then. From other videos, I learned that they are investing money in this field.
Thank you for this awsome video (and the preceding one), it helps me put everything in prospective.
Ionq hit 23 AQ in august... right on target to hit 25 by december, really exciting
Great job as always!
Can you please do an update ? :)
Thank you. I watched it with respect.
Archer, a deep technology company (ASX: AXE) has successfully developed and patented a quantum computing processor chip (CQ chip) that works at room temperature which is a groundbreaking achievement.
If you've watched this video, you'll have a hard time believing that claim
So, if we're able to get a decently working quantum computer by the end of this decade... what can they do? WIll they always be used for very specific calculations like supercomputer projects are, or are we going to see consumer grade quantum GPUs or quantum smartphones in like 30-40 years?
I think this all depends on the question if it is possible to get the Qbits physically stable without the need of much correction like cooling or high power lasers. If we don't, the size and power consumption of the quantum processor would be too high for any home application.
I think quantum computing is going to follow in the footsteps of fusion power. Its going to be X years away for a very very long time, perhaps forever. I hope I am wrong 🙂
There's high incentive to get Quantum computers sooner rather than later. Specially since they'll break encryption to steal tons of classified info and tons of Bitcoins
No Quantum is a prerequisite for stabilizing fusion. That is the issue. Technology has to be strategically performed in proper sequence. Regardless, Fusion never had the intensity of funding and research in applications which QC has recently. IONQ, Honeywell and the US Army have been able to achieve 99.9% accuracy with barium ions. The discoveries in QC being made now are fundamental and simply need scalability. The basics have all been solved.
@@madjunir Yeah Bitcoin better watchout
The difference is that this has private funding with real progress already. Even at a snail pace they will reach more qubits, while Fusion isn't getting any real funding because it doesn't have the same opportunities.
You are 100% correct.
thank you for everything you doing for us
Cool video, even cooler end. Thanks for the effort
Great Vid!
very good effort to make this video . i love your topics and approch to explain ,its always satisfies my mind curosities because i am always searching similar topics .a big 👏from me
Love the fact you added the Vince mcmahon meme .
QCI is not on the list with its optical approach. Why is that? Anybody knows?
Great video! Thank you.
Amazing video professor. Can you plz make a Map of Astrophysics?
Yeah! Nice video, thank you so much.
Why this cannel no longer creates content? I hope it's still alive. One of the best on TH-cam
Im quite hyped
Great research
Great work sir ❤👍
Could you maps of:
-Politics
-Psychology
-Philosophy
I don't get the computation at 4:01 about the quantum volume -- if 4x4 gives you 16, why does 5x5 give you 32?
😰WOOOOOW the best chanel ever
👋🏻hi am the new member from 🇲🇦am just lerin the English but I understand every thing, I like this chaine . Thank you for all .
Please make separate short videos explaining each technology if your time permits. TIA
GREAT WORK
Great work sir.. thank you for doing it.. I like yor work..
I’m currently working on getting my degree in electrical computer engineering I wanna join one of these companies and help make this possible 🙌🏿
You might want to study quantum physics.
No mentioning China is missing half of the picture in this video
11:28 You could say this video puts me into a *super* position... I'll see myself out
What do you think about algorithm-based benchmarking vs QV?
Can you make a video about The Map of Electronics
Hey!
Would be awsome if you would make a video of "Map of Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics".
I look forward to your updates.
Great outro there, 10/10
"Oh yeah, like and scruibe- bollocks"
Many thanks
This race and upcoming NASA missions are keeping me excited for the future.
most of those companies make their predictions based on nothing and go out with huge statements just to get funding
Like everything that started from nothing. Even farming.
P.S. I literally work right beside by that massive grouping of crows you filmed which by coincidence is only two Km away from D-Wave's headquarters!
Love this
keen for a DoS bookshelf tour. think i can see a copy of 'Harry Potter and DiVincenzo's Criteria'
Thank you very much:)
About to reach a million
Quantinuum system model H1-2? I have a couple of those in the storage shed.
So why is it called Quantum Volume when it is calculated using only two dimensions? 🤔 One would think that it would be a measure of Quantum Area. Is this just a poorly throughout convention or am I misunderstanding something?
That was awesome thank you and the last part was really funny I did enjoy the video.. 😂😆
Why doesn’t IonQ show in your comparison?
Do the map of politics & economy systems :D This would be awesome
Do you think they’d be available for regular users ? I think I’d like to get my hands on this space
I enjiyed this video! Horay! Thank you!
0:46 Me every time my teacher asks me questions about the lecture
Nice vid! Could you do a map of engineering?
Okay :)
great video
Can you please make a new video like this.
if i work on quantum algorithms, qml this type of things can i work with hardware site also with this knowledge ?
I made a 6.7 million qubit quantum computer in my garage and let it run for 20 minutes, I went and made lunch and when I came back into the garage there were 2 electromagnetic sparkly human type beings fighting each other. The being that had a DARPA uniform on was beating the other sparkly beings ass and it ended up destroying my quantum computer in the process of the beat down. It then turned to me and said “understand” before disappearing into a heatwave... I haven’t built another one since then.
I love your diagrams
Can you make a video for Data Science , please ?
Can you make quantum computing series, I would definitely pay you if you mentor me on this
What do you think of Microsoft's announcement of detecting Majorana modes?
Can you make update for half year ?
Very valuable information in a world bombarded by Quantum vapor ware
Maybe consider bioinformatics for the next video? And another video about how AI is developed?
Please make your video on MAP OF PSYCHOLOGY
UNSW, Coldquanta and Atom computing have interesting numbers
4:05 how is 6x6=64?
Hey, great channel. Would love to buy some of your posters. Is there any way to buy them in the UK? Can only find US based delivery on the platforms you have advertised.
Yes I believe my store on RedBubble has UK based manufacturing and shipping.