Type 23 is better than most of these anyways on this list, better anti submarine helicopters, better radar and sea Ceptor is basically aster 15.. best in the world and also to mention the best rowed array sonar
@@glastonbury4304 Russia has always been a piss - poor excuse for a country. When their puppet, trump is gone so will their influence. In the future, all they'll be famous for will be troll farms.
The Chinese frigates have many characteristics of the UK type 23 and type 45 but similar profile to the newer Glasgow class. We have a more auto mated Navy now than when I served (CVS, Type 22, Type 42)
Japan and China still have Royal navy Type uniforms , both copied the RN because they are the best, maybe not biggest anymore but still the best navy structure. Even USA has a navy started by a Brit 🇬🇧, well scottish actually. Fact.
0:25 that's brp jose rizal the newest frigate of the Philippine navy and is a semi stealth frigate and also has a anti nuclear procedure to keep its crew safe from a nuclear attack. a magnificent ship perfect for archipelogic island nation like philippines.
@@davepanganiban571 well the frigate is still getting its armaments and ammunitions due to the pandemic so in these times our navy would be busy in taking care of humanitarian issues than the modernisation for this time and plus the economy has plundered down due to the pandemic so the ship is equipment is postponed for delivery.
Surely you can't expect to see it in the top 10 though. With only 4 ASM, lackluster electronics, and 8 unused SAM cells. Not saying its bad by any means. Its far superior to anything the Phillipine navy has operated in the past but its not in the tier of top frigates.
Couple of things missing in 22350 info. Poliment-Redus SAM could utilize few more missiles 9М96Е (4 per cell) with the range of 40-50 km. 9М100 (16 per cell) with the range of 10-15 km.
By far the heaviest of all these vessels, the 6645 tons Iver Huitfeldt-class, are really stealthy guided-missile destroyers. Denmark has five frigate-destroyers in this superior weight class armed with Harpoons cruise missiles. The Danish Navy classify them as a frigates only to avoid antagonizing the Russians (and Sweden who has zero frigates as opposed to Denmark who has 9 in all). That´s how polite the Danes are.
Well, yes and no... The two first, Absalon and Esbern Snare (Absalon Class) was commisioned for a support-and-control role, therefore designated "Flexible Support Ships". For internal political reasons, they were not initially designated as "Frigates". This was not to avoid antagonizing Russia, rather to not sound too "warlike" in the domestic political climate. They have, however, later been re-classified as frigates. These two ships of the Absalon Class became the basis for the construction of the Iver Huitfeldt Class, which are more to be considered "true" frigates. (Absolon's only have two engines, less armament and are more suitable for various supporting roles, rather than the one of front line combatant - a role more befitting the Ivar Huitfeldt class of ships. The Absalon Class ships are today set up for anti-submarine warfare, as the Iver Huitfeldt's are set up in an anti-air role. Harpoon missiles are not cruise missiles - they are anti-ship missiles. Both classes should (afaik) be capable of being armed with Tomahawk cruise missiles, but those are not yet fielded by the Danish Navy.
@@zuki70 Please note that the Iver Huitfeldt Class is armed with the upgraded block ll Harpoon missiles - These are regarded as short-range subsonic naval STS (surface to surface) CRUISE MISSILES by most sources and is indeed included in wikipedia´s list of cruise missiles together with similar missile systems such as Naval Strike Missile (Norway) and R-360 Neptune (Ukraine). Will you also now claim these aren´t cruise missiles? The Iver Huitfeldt's are set up in an air defence role indeed, and with their huge size (comparable to WWll light cruisers), large advanced radar systems (SMART-L and APAR), their armament (Evolved Sea Sparrow missile and SM-2 IIIA) and their extreme endurance they are in fact nothing less than full blown guided missile destroyers, not merely "frigates" which is basicly just a term for ocean going patrol vessels. The reason we call them frigates has absolutely nothing to do with any domestic political climate in Denmark. We call them frigates solely for international/diplomatic reasons because we, in line with the Dutch, the Germans and the Norwegians, are very nice and humble people who wouldn´t want to be seen as antagonizing a certain...you know who. Lol.
A lot of 'frigates' in European countries would actually classify as destroyers according to NATO standards. Note for instance that the spanish Alvaro de bazan class frigates are identical to the australian Hobart class destroyers.
Alvaro de Bazan F 100 is one of the best. In few months they will have the medium live upgrade and they will be even more powerfull. They will recibe new tech used in the future F 110 ASW frigate.
la cosa que le falta las Albaro de Bazán es que le ponga un ciws en condiciones ( que esta en desarrollo por escribano) y que le equipen los sm3 y Tomahawk pare ser igual que la goroskov la cosa que la goroskov es mas un destructor mas que una fragata y recuerda que los rusos siempre le ponen demasiado armamento a sus buques para suplir los bajos números de su flota. Pero que vamos las Albaro de Bazán no tienen nada que envidiar y encima tiene mucho margen para futuras mejoras y están muy bien valoradas por la OTAN
@@ser43_OLDC Este top es basura la fragata española solo en celdas para misiles supera ha todas estas chatarras y ya no ablo del sistema aegis ,estos anglosajones siempre ponen su chatarra sin tener en cuenta las capacidades reales de los buques
@@benjaminbeceirofreire6531 la cosa que hay fragatas do de hay destructores y destructores donde fragatas. Las albaro de bazan son destructores y las goroskov también. Pero si esta mal
Modern warfare takes place more in the air, under the sea and on land in tank or stealth infantry missions, hence the preferance for smaller naval vessels, apart from aircraft carriers which have got bigger to launch more aircraft, as they are more likely to be, taking down air threats, submarines or shooting at land targets, or just patrolling to stop unwanted intrusion into a country's own waters, of enemy countries or pirates. For the most part the all out sea battle, seems to be a thing of the past.
Russias Cold War Naval Doctrine was very close to interwar Japan. "We will be outnumbered, we can't outbuild them, so lets make sure a single ship of ours can engage as many targets as possible." Hence why things like Moskva class cruisers are floating missile batteries with air-plane sized missiles, designed to out-shoot a US navy task-force and then run like hell. The idea was, that if you throw enough shit at the wall, eventually some of it will stick, and sinking one or even two carriers is a huge win, even if you have to lose half a dozen ships to do so. But with the idea of all out war being somewhat of a relic, ships are mostly designed around fleet protection and support. Destroyers are the main surface combat unit (other than carriers) and a "decisive fleet action" would probably involve tons of aircraft launched from carriers, rather than two fleets moving in to engage each other with missiles. But you know, they still carry them, because you never know...
With zircon fitted, Gorshkov will just extend it's lead! What Russia lacks is a modern destroyer! The Leader class seems a bit ambitious, so maybe if they scaled it down a bit they could produce a destroyer sized ship quicker and cheaper!
The Admiral Gorshkov pretty much is a Destroyer actually. Even though it's officially classified as frigate, but in fact it has the capabilities of a Destroyer.
11:04 4.Iver Huitfeldt Class Frigates Indonesia Future Frigate for indonesian navy Indonesia has signed a preliminary contract with the Danish Odense Maritime Technology to supply 2 Iver Huitfeldt within 5 years at the total cost of $ 720 Million
@@lottintv3518 you called becz of lots of weapon load but still Shivalik have great place to induct more set of 8 offense Missile and and more Barak but indian navy normally building ship with limits not dumping
Think the Scandinavian countries build the most beautiful war ships hands down. It is easy to see they are tied to the water and have a long successful history of maritime science.
4 ปีที่แล้ว +1
Please tell me you were kidding, because the mega expensive Norwegian frigate sank during a training exercise ..
Interesting to note what you have not included in this list. The Halifax Class Frigates of the RCN have been updated and are vastly improved with awesome weapons and overall capability. Amazing what can be done with a good overall platform. Naysayers will not agree with me but the defense contractors involved with this update are best in the world. From a defense point of view it is always good to be underestimated.
Yes the Halifax frigate updates are really good , Canada is now busy updating other countries frigates now . Also building the new frigates on the east coast .
We admire your patriotism...but I think this site is referencing platform designs under 36 years old. The Halifax, with her upgrades still offers a robust contribution...but like the Type 23...It's time. When I was a kid, the RCN had 20 DDEs, 4 Iroquois....and a flippin' Light fleet carrier. Today, the Canadians have chosen to build 15 T26 (Lamborghinis) to cover both coasts?... Sorry..No. Remembering traditions and history...the game remains Anti-sub and control of Sea lanes. The RCN in conjunction with the 3 other Royals...always keeping our Kiwi friends in mind, requires a more realistic expenditure to fulfill these roles. The RCN requires: 06...Type 26. 14...Type 31. 12...Visby Corvettes. 09...A-26 SSK. 04...''Hardened'' Astrix AOR. Because of the current 'SJW' dire straights of the Armed Forces....don't get me going. *All 6 of the new AOP/Arctic Patrol Vessels, should be operated by an RCN trained and militarized and armed Canadian Coast Guard, using the United States and Australia as an example. Tally Ho Tars!
@@bobdevreeze4741 Ring your nurse....on your trike🚲 Of course, there has always been a massive close joint liaison...of course, they're similar, but to suggest the Halifax Class was just some kind of T23 carbon copy?....save it...Nunca/nay. I was a recruiter for the program, and many experts were indeed brought over from Yarrow on the Clyde to 'Sin Gin'....out of necessity. The brother-in-law of a close friend was a Lt. Cmdr in the Canadian design team...Just look at them. believe me...just like the Iroquois' were the naval game-changers 10 years previous...the 12 Cities' were soon recognized as the second step to none.
the Bergamini class (FREMM) in my opinion they must be in second or third place they are superior to various Aquitaine, Bazan etc ... I think you do not realize what these ships can do
He missed the fact that they are twice as armed as the French counterpart, and also missed the fact that they actually can carry 8 OTOmat missiles plus torpedoes
The Alvaro de Bazan class is very superior to the Bergamini class and to many others. Oficialy the Bazan class is a frigate, but in fact it has the firepower of a destroyer.
Roberto Perez it’s not at all superior.. it’s older less stealth and with less technology and systems.. the only good thing is the amount of missiles it has It even has an outdated version of the AEGIS system.. the Bergamini has radars with twice the range of the Alvaro de Bazan
@@raptor2-40delta2 la version mas barata del AEGIS es infinitamente superior a cualquier fragata italiana. Las F100 estan incluidas en el escudo balistico de la OTAN, cosa que ninguna fragata italiana tiene esas capacidades
Fran Garcia I understand Spanish but I can’t write it so I’ll answer in English.. Italian frigates have Selex ES radar systems which can simultaneously track twice as much targets compared to the Aegis The only reason why the Spanish frigate is in the NATO shield it’s because it is compatible with the US systems Otherwise Italians would have such roles since our new radars also have more range (the Aegis tue Spanish have is around 400/500km of range, the Italian new radars can reach up to 600/700km, as much as US improved Aegis) So no sono ah ships are far inferior in both radar systems and gun systems
Bergamini in 7th? Seriously? Baseless. Its the most high tech frigate in the world. The combination of PAAMS, EMPAR, Aster missiles, and STRALES guns grant it the most capable and high tech air defense frigate in the world. If you knew as much as you think you know it would be at the top alongside the Sachsen.
TheEvertw really? I knew that usa and japan had the SM 3 missile. The netherlands was trying to buy it I also knew that. But I thought it was just still to be done. The usa has SM3 missiles in spain to protect ballistic missiles going to europe or to usa crossing the atlantic ocean
@@jonsauca You are right. The decision to buy the SM-3 was taken in 2018, so I assumed it would have been done by now, but that doesn't seem to be the case yet. Apart from actually stocking the missiles, these ships have proven themselves in acquiring ballistic missiles and directing SM-3's to intercept, using the Dutch SMART-L and APAR radar systems and the ECF C&C system. The SM-3's were fired by American ships but directed by the APAR.
TheEvertw well. Thats what I thought. The usa is veary cautious when selling some of their best technology.. but I hope your country finally buys that missile!, seems to be veary good and it is just for defending from ICBMs. We need that to protect european countryies
Russia has the best frigates... New Stealth frigates armed with the most advanced firepower. 1 frigate armed with zircon will give it the firepower to destroy 16 destroyers.
0:240:30 thats our own brp jose rizal it has anti air anti surface anti sub and electronic warfare we are very proud of our frigate because thats our first ever frigate missile capable
Ok, when i saw our Sachsen-Class on 2. Place i knew, that this list is bulls***. First of all, Sachsen-Class in in fact a destroyer, even when it is officially called a frigate, cause the german marine officially does not want to habe destroyers.... . Second, it is the same ship as the De Zeven Provincien class with some country-specific differences between the two classes. In every difference, the De Zeven has the stronger/better equipment, so if you call both of them a frigate, it is superior to the Sachsen....
@@yeetmarster4094 Sachsen-Class, De-Zeven-Class and Alvaro-de-Bazan-Class are all based on the TFC, the Trilateral Frigate Cooperation. The fundamental basics are the same for all the classes, with country-specific differences (engines, hangar, vls etc.). No one said "baugleich"....
Only 16vls launcher? Hell nah.. Formidable is only a medium frigate compared to these beast ladies in the video, if the video just ranking about medium frigate, maybe maharajalela class, formidable class, jose rizal class and RE Martadinata class would be on the list
@@jinfat466416 is enough missiles as long as their guidance/tracking system works well with the ships radar. Its better to have 16 capable missiles that 32 missiles with poor hit probability.
Andy Meso America currently doesn’t have any frigates and the U.Ks are old though still capable but when the type 26 comes it will easily break top 2 and the type 31 top 6
Well, but there is not actually, right? So there is no mistake in the vídeo. In spanish ones some ciws are going to be installed, but arent still in service. So the video is correct.
@@jonsauca yes but for others frigates he mantioned the space for additional missiles but for the FREEM he said nothing, you literally just need to search on Wikipedia to find it. Even on dcs website it is said...
D K ah I didnt notice that. Allways these kind of videos have errors.. for the spanish ones he didnt mention the 25 mm guns... and in the Russian one he even said the 14 mm machine guns, when it is obvious that most ships in the list have 12,7 mm guns but he didnt said...
@@jonsauca for gorshkov class, the machinegun could be the kpv with 14.5mm rounds. Another mistake is the 2 additional oto melara 76mm on bergamini class. In fact they are not currently mounted. I have seen a prototype showed for the competition for the greeks future main frigate. But i guess the 2 additional turetts are in fact some sort of 40mm. Maybe a New dardo.
Type 54A isn't very good, it is a crappy copy of the Lafayette class and armed with bad copies of Russian missiles. The quality of the sailors is even worse they actually have rules to avoid collision between their ships and they need to stay so far apart you can sail a Nimitz class supercarrier and it's escorts in between 🤣🤣🤣
The UK has a fleet of nuclear submarines that are stealth, hence the anti submarine stuff on that Spanish vessel, because they are paranoid about us because of Gibraltar, but the truth is we have no hostile intent and we don't see them as a threat, we are more concerned about the Russian and the Argentinians.
But Julia has submarine of nuclear technology almost all the big countries now that too of stealth technology. You do not worry that the UK sun never sets but now The British sun has started to set.
i would of put the halifax class in this list considering the ship operates in the artic, is combat proven and non have sunk unlike a few ships in this list
Most of these navies don't have capital size ships worth protecting. There was too much emphasis on AA defense and not enough info on anti-surface capabilities besides the size and number of tubes. Sub hunting is the traditional role of a frigate. I doubt most of these are on the same or equal technology plane when it comes to underwater kit.
Once HMS Glasgow goes on line and subsequent frigates of the same, the RN will be back in the Frigate business
Type 23 is better than most of these anyways on this list, better anti submarine helicopters, better radar and sea Ceptor is basically aster 15.. best in the world and also to mention the best rowed array sonar
@@jbx-
🥳🥳🥳🥳😂
Петьо Стоянов what you celebrating?
@@jbx- probably just thankful their tugs are better built than their navy 🤷🤣🤣
@@glastonbury4304 Russia has always been a piss - poor excuse for a country. When their puppet, trump is gone so will their influence. In the future, all they'll be famous for will be troll farms.
The Chinese frigates have many characteristics of the UK type 23 and type 45 but similar profile to the newer Glasgow class. We have a more auto mated Navy now than when I served (CVS, Type 22, Type 42)
Japan and China still have Royal navy Type uniforms , both copied the RN because they are the best, maybe not biggest anymore but still the best navy structure. Even USA has a navy started by a Brit 🇬🇧, well scottish actually. Fact.
Álvaro de Bazán!!
Viva España!!
0:25 that's brp jose rizal the newest frigate of the Philippine navy and is a semi stealth frigate and also has a anti nuclear procedure to keep its crew safe from a nuclear attack. a magnificent ship perfect for archipelogic island nation like philippines.
The ships is strong men but the weapons the installed are not strong and even its a missile guided frigate it dont have missiles( ps. im a filipino)
@@davepanganiban571 well the frigate is still getting its armaments and ammunitions due to the pandemic so in these times our navy would be busy in taking care of humanitarian issues than the modernisation for this time and plus the economy has plundered down due to the pandemic so the ship is equipment is postponed for delivery.
Surely you can't expect to see it in the top 10 though. With only 4 ASM, lackluster electronics, and 8 unused SAM cells. Not saying its bad by any means. Its far superior to anything the Phillipine navy has operated in the past but its not in the tier of top frigates.
Guess who got Fitted for Brahmos Missles........
LoL unarmed frigate, talk a lot without looking at the facts..
Thank you JMSDF for the incoming 16 Kumano class frigates.Banzai...
Couple of things missing in 22350 info.
Poliment-Redus SAM could utilize few more missiles
9М96Е (4 per cell) with the range of 40-50 km.
9М100 (16 per cell) with the range of 10-15 km.
By far the heaviest of all these vessels, the 6645 tons Iver Huitfeldt-class, are really stealthy guided-missile destroyers. Denmark has five frigate-destroyers in this superior weight class armed with Harpoons cruise missiles. The Danish Navy classify them as a frigates only to avoid antagonizing the Russians (and Sweden who has zero frigates as opposed to Denmark who has 9 in all). That´s how polite the Danes are.
Well, yes and no... The two first, Absalon and Esbern Snare (Absalon Class) was commisioned for a support-and-control role, therefore designated "Flexible Support Ships". For internal political reasons, they were not initially designated as "Frigates". This was not to avoid antagonizing Russia, rather to not sound too "warlike" in the domestic political climate.
They have, however, later been re-classified as frigates.
These two ships of the Absalon Class became the basis for the construction of the Iver Huitfeldt Class, which are more to be considered "true" frigates. (Absolon's only have two engines, less armament and are more suitable for various supporting roles, rather than the one of front line combatant - a role more befitting the Ivar Huitfeldt class of ships.
The Absalon Class ships are today set up for anti-submarine warfare, as the Iver Huitfeldt's are set up in an anti-air role.
Harpoon missiles are not cruise missiles - they are anti-ship missiles.
Both classes should (afaik) be capable of being armed with Tomahawk cruise missiles, but those are not yet fielded by the Danish Navy.
@@zuki70 Please note that the Iver Huitfeldt Class is armed with the upgraded block ll Harpoon missiles - These are regarded as short-range subsonic naval STS (surface to surface) CRUISE MISSILES by most sources and is indeed included in wikipedia´s list of cruise missiles together with similar missile systems such as Naval Strike Missile (Norway) and R-360 Neptune (Ukraine). Will you also now claim these aren´t cruise missiles?
The Iver Huitfeldt's are set up in an air defence role indeed, and with their huge size (comparable to WWll light cruisers), large advanced radar systems (SMART-L and APAR), their armament (Evolved Sea Sparrow missile and SM-2 IIIA) and their extreme endurance they are in fact nothing less than full blown guided missile destroyers, not merely "frigates" which is basicly just a term for ocean going patrol vessels.
The reason we call them frigates has absolutely nothing to do with any domestic political climate in Denmark. We call them frigates solely for international/diplomatic reasons because we, in line with the Dutch, the Germans and the Norwegians, are very nice and humble people who wouldn´t want to be seen as antagonizing a certain...you know who. Lol.
A lot of 'frigates' in European countries would actually classify as destroyers according to NATO standards. Note for instance that the spanish Alvaro de bazan class frigates are identical to the australian Hobart class destroyers.
Alvaro is no 1 defense
Its a magnificent and powerful ship no doubt. I'd put it third after FREMM, and Sachsen.
Alvaro de Bazan F 100 is one of the best. In few months they will have the medium live upgrade and they will be even more powerfull. They will recibe new tech used in the future F 110 ASW frigate.
la cosa que le falta las Albaro de Bazán es que le ponga un ciws en condiciones ( que esta en desarrollo por escribano) y que le equipen los sm3 y Tomahawk pare ser igual que la goroskov la cosa que la goroskov es mas un destructor mas que una fragata y recuerda que los rusos siempre le ponen demasiado armamento a sus buques para suplir los bajos números de su flota. Pero que vamos las Albaro de Bazán no tienen nada que envidiar y encima tiene mucho margen para futuras mejoras y están muy bien valoradas por la OTAN
@@ser43_OLDC Este top es basura la fragata española solo en celdas para misiles supera ha todas estas chatarras y ya no ablo del sistema aegis ,estos anglosajones siempre ponen su chatarra sin tener en cuenta las capacidades reales de los buques
@@benjaminbeceirofreire6531 la cosa que hay fragatas do de hay destructores y destructores donde fragatas. Las albaro de bazan son destructores y las goroskov también. Pero si esta mal
Royal Australian Navy now has these excellent ships .
Modern warfare takes place more in the air, under the sea and on land in tank or stealth infantry missions, hence the preferance for smaller naval vessels, apart from aircraft carriers which have got bigger to launch more aircraft, as they are more likely to be, taking down air threats, submarines or shooting at land targets, or just patrolling to stop unwanted intrusion into a country's own waters, of enemy countries or pirates. For the most part the all out sea battle, seems to be a thing of the past.
Russias Cold War Naval Doctrine was very close to interwar Japan.
"We will be outnumbered, we can't outbuild them, so lets make sure a single ship of ours can engage as many targets as possible."
Hence why things like Moskva class cruisers are floating missile batteries with air-plane sized missiles, designed to out-shoot a US navy task-force and then run like hell.
The idea was, that if you throw enough shit at the wall, eventually some of it will stick, and sinking one or even two carriers is a huge win, even if you have to lose half a dozen ships to do so.
But with the idea of all out war being somewhat of a relic, ships are mostly designed around fleet protection and support. Destroyers are the main surface combat unit (other than carriers) and a "decisive fleet action" would probably involve tons of aircraft launched from carriers, rather than two fleets moving in to engage each other with missiles.
But you know, they still carry them, because you never know...
Shivalik and Sachsen class are my favorite frigates
Also Nilgiri which is unfortunately not included in the list😔
Very good video, nice presentation
How would you rate the Swedish Visby class frigates compared to the ones you mention as the top 10?
Visby is an corvette, even the Swedish Navy classify it as a Corvette
Visby are not frigates
Visby, K130 Braunschweig, Skjold and Sigma class warships are corvettes
You know that the zeven provincièn class and the sachsen class are extremely simulair, richt?
With zircon fitted, Gorshkov will just extend it's lead! What Russia lacks is a modern destroyer! The Leader class seems a bit ambitious, so maybe if they scaled it down a bit they could produce a destroyer sized ship quicker and cheaper!
The Admiral Gorshkov pretty much is a Destroyer actually. Even though it's officially classified as frigate, but in fact it has the capabilities of a Destroyer.
Project 22350M aka upgraded gorskhov should be best suited
Military Analysis Even the Sachsen class although it is weaker than the Admiral Gorkov class
11:04
4.Iver Huitfeldt Class Frigates
Indonesia Future Frigate for indonesian navy
Indonesia has signed a preliminary contract with the Danish Odense Maritime Technology to supply 2 Iver Huitfeldt within 5 years at the total cost of $ 720 Million
Shivalik class 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💪🇮🇳🇮🇳
No chance against Admiral Gorshkov but respect to Shivalik
@@lottintv3518 you called becz of lots of weapon load but still Shivalik have great place to induct more set of 8 offense Missile and and more Barak but indian navy normally building ship with limits not dumping
Think the Scandinavian countries build the most beautiful war ships hands down. It is easy to see they are tied to the water and have a long successful history of maritime science.
Please tell me you were kidding, because the mega expensive Norwegian frigate sank during a training exercise ..
@ they make great paper weights, sorry for the lack of clear and concise sarcasm
@ ok, is that you telling me to go F myself? in scandinavian computer shorthand?
Fridjolf Nansen makes its way onto the list because of its NSM but surely its not on the level of these other vessels.
Especially the Visby class. It has the aesthetics
Interesting to note what you have not included in this list. The Halifax Class Frigates of the RCN have been updated and are vastly improved with awesome weapons and overall capability. Amazing what can be done with a good overall platform. Naysayers will not agree with me but the defense contractors involved with this update are best in the world. From a defense point of view it is always good to be underestimated.
The Canadian Frigate is based on the British type 26 frigate. We modified it to suite our needs , we did not develop it.
Yes the Halifax frigate updates are really good , Canada is now busy updating other countries frigates now . Also building the new frigates on the east coast .
We admire your patriotism...but I think this site is referencing platform designs under 36 years old.
The Halifax, with her upgrades still offers a robust contribution...but like the Type 23...It's time.
When I was a kid, the RCN had 20 DDEs, 4 Iroquois....and a flippin' Light fleet carrier.
Today, the Canadians have chosen to build 15 T26 (Lamborghinis) to cover both coasts?... Sorry..No.
Remembering traditions and history...the game remains Anti-sub and control of Sea lanes.
The RCN in conjunction with the 3 other Royals...always keeping our Kiwi friends in mind, requires a more realistic expenditure to fulfill these roles.
The RCN requires:
06...Type 26.
14...Type 31.
12...Visby Corvettes.
09...A-26 SSK.
04...''Hardened'' Astrix AOR.
Because of the current 'SJW' dire straights of the Armed Forces....don't get me going.
*All 6 of the new AOP/Arctic Patrol Vessels, should be operated by an RCN trained and militarized and armed Canadian Coast Guard, using the United States and Australia as an example.
Tally Ho Tars!
@@bobdevreeze4741
Ring your nurse....on your trike🚲
Of course, there has always been a massive close joint liaison...of course, they're similar, but to suggest the Halifax Class was just some kind of T23 carbon copy?....save it...Nunca/nay.
I was a recruiter for the program, and many experts were indeed brought over from Yarrow on the Clyde to 'Sin Gin'....out of necessity.
The brother-in-law of a close friend was a Lt. Cmdr in the Canadian design team...Just look at them. believe me...just like the Iroquois' were the naval game-changers 10 years previous...the 12 Cities' were soon recognized as the second step to none.
the Bergamini class (FREMM) in my opinion they must be in second or third place they are superior to various Aquitaine, Bazan etc ... I think you do not realize what these ships can do
He missed the fact that they are twice as armed as the French counterpart, and also missed the fact that they actually can carry 8 OTOmat missiles plus torpedoes
The Alvaro de Bazan class is very superior to the Bergamini class and to many others. Oficialy the Bazan class is a frigate, but in fact it has the firepower of a destroyer.
Roberto Perez it’s not at all superior.. it’s older less stealth and with less technology and systems.. the only good thing is the amount of missiles it has
It even has an outdated version of the AEGIS system.. the Bergamini has radars with twice the range of the Alvaro de Bazan
@@raptor2-40delta2 la version mas barata del AEGIS es infinitamente superior a cualquier fragata italiana. Las F100 estan incluidas en el escudo balistico de la OTAN, cosa que ninguna fragata italiana tiene esas capacidades
Fran Garcia I understand Spanish but I can’t write it so I’ll answer in English.. Italian frigates have Selex ES radar systems which can simultaneously track twice as much targets compared to the Aegis
The only reason why the Spanish frigate is in the NATO shield it’s because it is compatible with the US systems
Otherwise Italians would have such roles since our new radars also have more range (the Aegis tue Spanish have is around 400/500km of range, the Italian new radars can reach up to 600/700km, as much as US improved Aegis)
So no sono ah ships are far inferior in both radar systems and gun systems
Dude A battleship is a warship, but not all warships are battleships. GET IT RIGHT!!!
Glad to see someone points it out.
The Type 26 Frigate is one of the best in the world
Belhara?
Not understanding the bases of the ranking. Total arm, speed, range, radar system, automation....size, style, or preference of nation?
Bergamini in 7th? Seriously? Baseless. Its the most high tech frigate in the world. The combination of PAAMS, EMPAR, Aster missiles, and STRALES guns grant it the most capable and high tech air defense frigate in the world. If you knew as much as you think you know it would be at the top alongside the Sachsen.
This music gave me a headache.
You should do Subnautica creatures or maybe sea monsters from video games, for a more comprehensive list.
The zeven provinciën also has proven anti-ballistic capability, which you forgot to mention...
TheEvertw really? I knew that usa and japan had the SM 3 missile. The netherlands was trying to buy it I also knew that. But I thought it was just still to be done. The usa has SM3 missiles in spain to protect ballistic missiles going to europe or to usa crossing the atlantic ocean
@@jonsauca You are right. The decision to buy the SM-3 was taken in 2018, so I assumed it would have been done by now, but that doesn't seem to be the case yet.
Apart from actually stocking the missiles, these ships have proven themselves in acquiring ballistic missiles and directing SM-3's to intercept, using the Dutch SMART-L and APAR radar systems and the ECF C&C system. The SM-3's were fired by American ships but directed by the APAR.
TheEvertw well. Thats what I thought. The usa is veary cautious when selling some of their best technology.. but I hope your country finally buys that missile!, seems to be veary good and it is just for defending from ICBMs. We need that to protect european countryies
Fremm look very nice
whats the name of the background music?
Where Type 26 frigate
Not yet in service
Great video,frigates.
Good video but the prices are not mentioned
Trend of heavy & multi role frigate
Russia has the best frigates... New Stealth frigates armed with the most advanced firepower. 1 frigate armed with zircon will give it the firepower to destroy 16 destroyers.
0:24 0:30 thats our own brp jose rizal it has anti air anti surface anti sub and electronic warfare we are very proud of our frigate because thats our first ever frigate missile capable
Ok, when i saw our Sachsen-Class on 2. Place i knew, that this list is bulls***. First of all, Sachsen-Class in in fact a destroyer, even when it is officially called a frigate, cause the german marine officially does not want to habe destroyers.... . Second, it is the same ship as the De Zeven Provincien class with some country-specific differences between the two classes. In every difference, the De Zeven has the stronger/better equipment, so if you call both of them a frigate, it is superior to the Sachsen....
wo ist die sachsen baugleich mit der niederländischen?😂
@@yeetmarster4094 Sachsen-Class, De-Zeven-Class and Alvaro-de-Bazan-Class are all based on the TFC, the Trilateral Frigate Cooperation. The fundamental basics are the same for all the classes, with country-specific differences (engines, hangar, vls etc.). No one said "baugleich"....
Great and wonderful for us
Which largest frigate compared aircraft carrier ship and arm of 100 thousands types of missiles..
It's not the boat it's what it can do,
Why are not Type 31 in the rank?
Because type 26 is better.
Best watched at 1.25 speed.
Godzilla (IDW) Vs Kratos (GOW)
hypersonic zircon loaded , Gorskov
Lower the music level so we can hear the narrator.
How about RSN's Formidable class frigates?
Only 16vls launcher? Hell nah.. Formidable is only a medium frigate compared to these beast ladies in the video, if the video just ranking about medium frigate, maybe maharajalela class, formidable class, jose rizal class and RE Martadinata class would be on the list
@@jinfat466416 is enough missiles as long as their guidance/tracking system works well with the ships radar. Its better to have 16 capable missiles that 32 missiles with poor hit probability.
@@clitoralrosary9474 but the ships in the list are having more capable radar and censor than formidable has tho...
@@jinfat4664I agree and I don't believe formidable should be on the list either but I'm just making a point.
@@clitoralrosary9474 okk bro.. Have a nice day😊
Surely the max speed of 20knots for the No1 Russian frigate is wrong!
Andrew Hayes
It is 29,5 knots
Type 26?
Type 26 No.1
Not saying much for Her Britannic majesties frigates.
What about PLAN type 54D??
Is that frigate have in real life?
Iver huitfeldt !
I’m 9 hours late.
Most countries have to use frigates as destroyers, whereas some countries can use destroyers as frigates
Especially Deutschland
Wow I am early, this only has 157 views :o
That will be 4 quad launchers 4 Harpoon missile
Sm 6 best intercept missile
Strange there is no Talwar class frigate in this list as it is one of the best in the world second to Admiral Gorshkov class. Lol
Where are american / british fregates ??
Andy Meso America currently doesn’t have any frigates and the U.Ks are old though still capable but when the type 26 comes it will easily break top 2 and the type 31 top 6
look at the danish frigat ,the new british frigats is the ivar build on licens in scottland for the english navy
Powerfull missiled Russian Frigate could kill Dertroyer Bro
The number are false for the French fremm
There is and additional 16 A 70 vls that can be installed
Well, but there is not actually, right? So there is no mistake in the vídeo. In spanish ones some ciws are going to be installed, but arent still in service. So the video is correct.
@@jonsauca yes but for others frigates he mantioned the space for additional missiles but for the FREEM he said nothing, you literally just need to search on Wikipedia to find it. Even on dcs website it is said...
D K ah I didnt notice that. Allways these kind of videos have errors.. for the spanish ones he didnt mention the 25 mm guns... and in the Russian one he even said the 14 mm machine guns, when it is obvious that most ships in the list have 12,7 mm guns but he didnt said...
@@jonsauca for gorshkov class, the machinegun could be the kpv with 14.5mm rounds.
Another mistake is the 2 additional oto melara 76mm on bergamini class. In fact they are not currently mounted. I have seen a prototype showed for the competition for the greeks future main frigate. But i guess the 2 additional turetts are in fact some sort of 40mm. Maybe a New dardo.
Type 54A isn't very good, it is a crappy copy of the Lafayette class and armed with bad copies of Russian missiles. The quality of the sailors is even worse they actually have rules to avoid collision between their ships and they need to stay so far apart you can sail a Nimitz class supercarrier and it's escorts in between 🤣🤣🤣
So many types. The 31 and 26 are better than most all of these.
This list is for frigates already in use. The Type 26 and the Australian and Canadian variants are frigates of the future. Same for the Type 31.
Not pretty sure why the update type23 are not in the list, odd ? The are one of the most silent and has the type 2087 sonar
The UK has a fleet of nuclear submarines that are stealth, hence the anti submarine stuff on that Spanish vessel, because they are paranoid about us because of Gibraltar, but the truth is we have no hostile intent and we don't see them as a threat, we are more concerned about the Russian and the Argentinians.
Yeah well, try to build an empire where the sun never sets and people get distrustful of your intentions.
@@ZacLowing we didn't try, we succeeded
But Julia has submarine of nuclear technology almost all the big countries now that too of stealth technology. You do not worry that the UK sun never sets but now The British sun has started to set.
With all respect,nobody is paranoid.You simply do not build a surface combatant without antisubmarine defences.About Gibraltar....no comment
WCTA Chicago underground sound - There’s no trying about it. It happened!
What absolute poppycock. A 5000 tonne frigate being number 1? Get real please.
It's because of its weaponry, Admiral gorshkov frigates carry more weapons than the other ships on the list.
It is probably the cruise missiles that it carries, other frigates don't have those.
watch the launch of zircon from Gorshkov
i would of put the halifax class in this list considering the ship operates in the artic, is combat proven and non have sunk unlike a few ships in this list
Most of these navies don't have capital size ships worth protecting. There was too much emphasis on AA defense and not enough info on anti-surface capabilities besides the size and number of tubes. Sub hunting is the traditional role of a frigate. I doubt most of these are on the same or equal technology plane when it comes to underwater kit.
This list falls short to cover all frigates around the world.
🤣😂🤣😂
Ads greedy hahah.
An other one Russian propaganda.
I am
fed up of this russians propaganda!
Most of them are destroyers....false video