What should the Supreme Court’s role in our politics be?

At the Watson Institute, the beginning of summer means commencement festivities, moving trucks, and bittersweet goodbyes. In American politics, the beginning of summer means something very different: the approach of the Supreme Court's summer recess and, with it, the handing down of the Court’s final decisions from this term. This year’s cases will have profound effects on the 2024 election, gun rights, reproductive rights, and more.
While it’s nothing new for the Supreme Court to weigh in on contentious issues in society, as our guest on this episode sees it, something profound has shifted within the Court over the last few years. The decisions they hand down are not only increasingly transformative, they’re also lining up more and more clearly with our partisan politics. And no matter your politics, that should be a problem.
Kate Shaw is a constitutional law scholar and professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and a 2001 graduate of Brown University. She is also the co-host of the podcast “Strict Scrutiny,” which explores the Supreme Court - the cases, the people and the culture surrounding it.
On this episode, Dan Richards spoke with her about how the Supreme Court fits in our politics today, how that role has changed over time, and what Kate thinks its role in our society today should be.
Subscribe to Trending Globally wherever you listen to podcasts. (trending-globa...)
Subscribe to Strict Scrutiny wherever you listen to podcasts. (crooked.com/po...)

[@tonywilson4713]

I don't know what's more amazing.
That she points out that since 1969 (55 years) the Republicans have appointed 16 justices while the Democrats have only appointed 5.
*OR*
That she fails to point out the insane BIAS towards Ivy League graduates and in particular Harvard and Yale.
Right now the court has 4 Harvard and 4 Yale educated justices.
Prior to that there was at one time 8 Harvard educated justices on the court.
When Ketanji Brown Smith was appoint 5 of the 7 people under consideration were Harvard or Yale educated.
I have also heard reports that there is not SCOTUS 1 clerk from outside the Ivy League.
So NOT only is SCOTUS got an extremely biased POLITICAL stance but it also has an insanely narrow EDUCATION.