I really like his idea about how to interpret the political world from a psychological perspective, although I'm perhaps biased towards what I believe about politics in general
"cultural Marxism" is a bit of an oxymoron. Talk to actual Marxists, and they'll rail against the perspective you think is "cultural Marxism". You're really talking about postmodernism/poststructuralism, which is a body of thought that has long been anti-Marxist.
@@RobinWhistles basically in every way. It's easier to point out areas of agreement, since they're much smaller. But the key points of disagreement are over structure - "cultural Marxists" are poststructuralists, thinking that power is constituted in language and culture more so than formal structures of political-economic power. Whereas actual Marxists may concede that power is partly constituted by language and culture, but the real game is in the political-economic sphere, and the "cultural Marxists" do a disservice by focusing exclusively on less potent forms of power, and essentially running interference for real power, which remains predominantly in the form of ownership of serious economic wealth and the political influence that comes with it (including via propaganda campaigns: for instance, why the US healthcare system is the world's laughingstock - because private propaganda campaigns have worked).
I really like his idea about how to interpret the political world from a psychological perspective, although I'm perhaps biased towards what I believe about politics in general
Everybody is biased but can a person, as a political psychologist, set aside their biases in assessing and analyzing politics? This guy can’t!
very interesting thoughts. i studied international relations and now thinking about a master in psychology.
Thanks, now i understand
Grt I want more information mail id please
He fails to mention that it's simply not anti immigrant but anti cultural Marxist.
"cultural Marxism" is a bit of an oxymoron. Talk to actual Marxists, and they'll rail against the perspective you think is "cultural Marxism". You're really talking about postmodernism/poststructuralism, which is a body of thought that has long been anti-Marxist.
@@josephuspeterfranks6988 In what way are they against cultural Marxism? Do you associate with this group?
@@RobinWhistles basically in every way. It's easier to point out areas of agreement, since they're much smaller. But the key points of disagreement are over structure - "cultural Marxists" are poststructuralists, thinking that power is constituted in language and culture more so than formal structures of political-economic power. Whereas actual Marxists may concede that power is partly constituted by language and culture, but the real game is in the political-economic sphere, and the "cultural Marxists" do a disservice by focusing exclusively on less potent forms of power, and essentially running interference for real power, which remains predominantly in the form of ownership of serious economic wealth and the political influence that comes with it (including via propaganda campaigns: for instance, why the US healthcare system is the world's laughingstock - because private propaganda campaigns have worked).
uh ok dude
@@Jojo-kj1nb OK dudette?