Thank you!!! You don't know how much this helped me understand and complete my project with a high A+. You made it so easy to understand and set the timeline in order for me to write and present to the whole class!!!😊😏Keep up the good work👍👍👍💕
Don't mean to be pedantic, but I'm not sure that Aristotle was big on experimentation necessarily. He favored observation whereas Plato was all about contemplating abstract forms of supposedly perfect objects that existed in some other perfect dimension. Observation is important, but it's not the same as experiment. Love your work as always and Liliana is smokin'!
*Socrates taught Plato, who in turn taught Aristotle* Aristotle was the original Renaissance Man - long before the Renaissance. He wrote about *biology, ethics, logic, physics, rhetoric, politics*, and countless other subjects. In sum, Aristotle’s work comprised the first systematic form of Western Philosophy. *Aristotle is also considered the first genuine scientist in history*.
Aristotle left Athens before his trial could take place. He said he didn't want Athens to commit "a second crime against philosophy" :) P.S. Video suggestion: Aristarchus
Renaissance refers to rebirth meaning that there was a rebirth in knowledge art culture math science and everything. When we talk about that rebirth we usually refer to the Greeks as the point of original birth. So it’s not a renaissance they’re the actual birth.
Aristotle was NOT the "first genuine scientist in history". Except if you do not consider people like Democritus and Pythagoras "genuine" scientists. Because, both Democritus and Pythagoras were born long before Aristotle. Aristotle was born in 384 BC, Democritus in 460 BC and Pythagoras in 570 BC. Before starting making "educational" uploads about things you obviously don't know enough about, try to search thoroughly the basics before making such statements!!! And by the way, the notion of a "genuine" scientist is entirely meaningless, since you are either a scientist or you are not...
Sorry, I don't agree. You should consider more carefully what you say, because is incorrect. Pytagora knows nothing about science (and for science I mean empirical science, that is extensive of knowledge) he was a mathematician and mystic, and mathematics is not a science, at the best you can say that is a formal science, like logic, but if you don't apply it, it remains a formal knowledge, nothing less nothing more. Democritus was still impiged with the conflict between intellect and perception and preferred the former: atoms are not bodies otherwise they could be divided up to the infinite (and, by the way, this criticism is by Aristotle). Less rhetoric please, more depth.
العلم في منظوره الجديد (روبرت افروس دكتوراة فلسفة و جورج ستانيوس دكتوراة فيزياء )(الماضي و الخبرة العامة )(9). أهمية أرسطو ليست ناجمة عن معالجته لأكثر المواضيع و ليست نابعة من آرائه حول معظم القضايا و لكنها نابعة من وضوح إجابته و لكن من أين أتى هذا الوضوح ؟ أتى من صفاء عقله ، و هنا الأهم و الأكثر أهمية لماذا تمتع أرسطو بالوضوح و صفاء العقل و الذهن؟ فاتت اجوبته واضحة ، ليس كما يعتقد الكثيرون من ذكائه ، صفاء عقله ووضوح ذهنه هو انه راقب بعقله الاشياء من حوله دون افكار مسبقة و دون نظريات سابقة ، فلم تكن في عصره قد تزاحمت النظريات و كل تدعي الحقيقة و لا نظريات كثيرة تدعي المعرفة ولا أفكار كثيرة تدعي تفسير كل شيء و هذا يفسر بجزء منه لماذا سيطرت على عصرنا الحديث الفوض و الضبابية و الغموض و يفسر لماذا انتشرت المذاهب و قلت الأجوبة الحقيقية و الواضحة ،فساد الاضطراب و شاعت المتناقضات و تضاربت الآراء و تزاحمت على الساحة التيارات و الأهواء ،فنفر الناس من السؤال و ماتت الدهشة في النفوس فلحؤوا إلى حياتهم العادية يعيشون في قضاء شؤنهم بعيدا عن التأويلات و بعيدا عن تخرصات المذاهب المتعددة و النماذج المتضاربة و ألمتحارية و استأثرت بالساحة فئة امتهنت و احتكرت قرار الفكر و الثقافة ضاعت المعالم و فقدت الناس الثقة بهذه المؤسسات المتناحرة ، بأس الناس فلاذوا بالهدوء و راحوا يبحثون عن الطمأنينة و عن راحة العقل و تركوا السؤال و روحه الدهشة ماتت الرغبة و حلت في المكان العادة و الرتابة ، يذكر الكتاب أخطاء وقع فيها أرسطو و الحقيقة أن أكبر خطأ واضح وقع فيه أرسطو لا يزل الناس في الشرق كما في الغرب يرددونه ليل نهار و هو تعريفه للإنسان : الإنسان حيوان ناطق. و المعروف أن ميزة الحيوان إذا جاز التعبير و اعتبار عدم النطق ميزة للحيوان هو أنه لا يتكلم و لا ينطق و التعريف الادق هو ان الإنسان كائن عاقل . فالنبات و الحيوان و الانسان هم قبل كل شيء كائنات حية و بالتالي فالتعرف الحقيقي و الأقرب إلى الصحة هو كالتالي الإنسان كائن ناطق بدل حيوان ناطق ثم ان الإنسان لا يتميز عن الحيوان بالنطق بل كذلك بالارادة الحرة و بالاختيار الواعي و هو الكائن الوحيد الذي يضحك و هو الوحيد الذي يملك وعيا نوعيا يختلف عن وعي النبات و الحيوان لأنه يعي نفسه و غيره و يخطط للمستقبل لذلك كان التعريف الأقرب إلى الواقع و الحقيقة هو ان تهجر تعريف أرسطو الفاسد و نعتمد التعريف الادق : الإنسان كائن عاقل . 25/03/21
Yes indeed, Aristotle was a very fertile mind. But was never accepted as a Greek citizen. Many of his works, that have survived can be found at mit.classics.
Aristotle said - Peri Hermenias/De Interpretatione IV:IV - 'It is impossible then that being a man should mean not being a man - i.e. - it will not be possible to be and not be the same thing' & he takes this conflation of man & thing to consolidate the 'law' [principium] of non-contradiction 'not both A and not-A simultaneously'. In creating Non-Cantorian set theory [= Mengenlehre] I showed quantities not obeying this 'law' & in fact used the Grandi [= Fourier-Bolzano] series = -1 + 1 - 1 + 1 ... as a denumerable isomorphic line to yield the ambiguous sums 0, 1 and 1/2, using the latter to suggest an 'in-betweener' function for different infinities. As non-contradiction is a correlate of tertium exclusi and identity, I considered it evident A = A in Aristotelianism implies A is not subject to 'slippage' - i.e. - it holds to a myth of fixity in which becoming [Gk: gignomai] represses movement. Aristotle himself regarded these 'laws' as without proof & in his first ever logical treatise circa 350 BC its very title Analutika Protera Ln: Analytica Priora equates analutos = solved & episteme = knowing logicality whereas, in fact, solvability is based on the falsehood of no intermediary between contradictory statements. Aristotle's self-evidence for axiomata actually assumes a self which solves [= analuo upo principium tertii exclusi], but I connected recursive, infinite bases - themselves augmentative & thus incomplete - with "human beings", demonstrating mortals are neither human nor beings. Aristotelianism bedevils western ideologies in its Essentialism & it blocks TRANSFIGURATION, whereas Platonism at least indicates homoiosis to theo without, however, knowing how to actually achieve immortalization. Add your comment more_vert sen
Thank you!!! You don't know how much this helped me understand and complete my project with a high A+. You made it so easy to understand and set the timeline in order for me to write and present to the whole class!!!😊😏Keep up the good work👍👍👍💕
This is so wonderful to hear, thank you for sharing with us!! It makes us so happy to know we could help.
Thank you for watching! :)
This is so helpful for my school project due today!
First Socrates... Then Plato and now, Aristotle... Ah.. Master to student... Great work Socratica
Aditya Khanna Thank you so much! We'd love to hear who you'd like to see next. :)
Most splendid channel. I grew up learning the hard way. Reading etc.
good job explaining all of this exactly on point. Aristotle is one of my idols as many things he's done
I wish students get exposure to Aristotle's Life & work in their early school years.
Classical method of homeschooling
I am!
Wow this is beautiful! Aristotle's work at the Lyceum truly opened the minds of his students to new ideas.
Another great video; keep it up!
Thanks so much for the share! :)
Thank you! Every essentials of the philosopher discussed so skillfully and by an organised manner.
Don't mean to be pedantic, but I'm not sure that Aristotle was big on experimentation necessarily. He favored observation whereas Plato was all about contemplating abstract forms of supposedly perfect objects that existed in some other perfect dimension. Observation is important, but it's not the same as experiment.
Love your work as always and Liliana is smokin'!
"Not only can walking and talking be visually stimulating, but it can also be a great way to convey information!"
very clear and good explanation about life of Aristotle :) please upload more videos.
Bro both of his parents died when he was young thats so sad 😔 I couldn't imagine losing a parent, especially both and as a child
lucid, emanating smoothly pool of information!
"The more you know .. The more you know you don't know " --- Aristotle
*Socrates taught Plato, who in turn taught Aristotle*
Aristotle was the original Renaissance Man - long before the Renaissance. He wrote about *biology, ethics, logic, physics, rhetoric, politics*, and countless other subjects. In sum, Aristotle’s work comprised the first systematic form of Western Philosophy. *Aristotle is also considered the first genuine scientist in history*.
thanks for sharing : )
Great stuff. Good pace, easy to understand, clear points. ^_^
Socratica I rlly liked your vid it definitely helped me a lot specially with a presentation I had
Love you and Socratica!! ♡♥♡♥♡♥♡♥♡♥♥♥
Thank you for your nice comment, Hideo Nakamigawa! :)
I just want to tell you, Your hair is amazing
Great video!!! It gave things Wikipedia didn't have ★★★★★
Enjoyed very much.....thank you. :)
Isaac Newton next?
Thank you so much.
Do the Godfather of chemistry next Dmitri Mendeleev
He is great man
I love your videos. With respect.
Than kyou I didn't knew about the great philosopher
Aristotle left Athens before his trial could take place. He said he didn't want Athens to commit "a second crime against philosophy" :) P.S. Video suggestion: Aristarchus
Renaissance refers to rebirth meaning that there was a rebirth in knowledge art culture math science and everything. When we talk about that rebirth we usually refer to the Greeks as the point of original birth. So it’s not a renaissance they’re the actual birth.
I did really curious how they're studied.
Thank you so much.. And very nice👍👍 speech.. My favorite person 😍😍
Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up ❗👍👏👍👏👍
thank you so much
Keep up the good work and good movie
Always go to real essence of "everything"!
Great minds does not always concur with others...
it is always the case where previous science impedes the future. same happened with newton v einstein and einstein v current physics and so on.
The great Hellenes!
Now all we have is donkeys !
And more donkeys !
Love you
Bravo!
Thanx for this video now i can explain about Aristotle much better....😘😘😘
Aristotle stated when he fled Athens for Chalcis, that he would not let Athenians sin twice against philosophy...
So what does that actually mean? Thanks
So Plato was into a priori and Aristotle was into Aposteriority? Rationalism versus empiricism?
Aristotle was NOT the "first genuine scientist in history". Except if you do not consider people like Democritus and Pythagoras "genuine" scientists. Because, both Democritus and Pythagoras were born long before Aristotle. Aristotle was born in 384 BC, Democritus in 460 BC and Pythagoras in 570 BC. Before starting making "educational" uploads about things you obviously don't know enough about, try to search thoroughly the basics before making such statements!!! And by the way, the notion of a "genuine" scientist is entirely meaningless, since you are either a scientist or you are not...
Ο Τελευταίος των Ανθρώπων well, stop being so triggered.
Sorry, I don't agree. You should consider more carefully what you say, because is incorrect. Pytagora knows nothing about science (and for science I mean empirical science, that is extensive of knowledge) he was a mathematician and mystic, and mathematics is not a science, at the best you can say that is a formal science, like logic, but if you don't apply it, it remains a formal knowledge, nothing less nothing more. Democritus was still impiged with the conflict between intellect and perception and preferred the former: atoms are not bodies otherwise they could be divided up to the infinite (and, by the way, this criticism is by Aristotle). Less rhetoric please, more depth.
Tenure ended in 323 and he died in 322. Did I hear it wrong or something?
العلم في منظوره الجديد (روبرت افروس دكتوراة فلسفة و جورج ستانيوس دكتوراة فيزياء )(الماضي و الخبرة العامة )(9).
أهمية أرسطو ليست ناجمة عن معالجته لأكثر المواضيع و ليست نابعة من آرائه حول معظم القضايا و لكنها نابعة من وضوح إجابته و لكن من أين أتى هذا الوضوح ؟
أتى من صفاء عقله ،
و هنا الأهم و الأكثر أهمية لماذا تمتع أرسطو بالوضوح و صفاء العقل و الذهن؟
فاتت اجوبته واضحة ،
ليس كما يعتقد الكثيرون من ذكائه ، صفاء عقله ووضوح ذهنه هو انه راقب بعقله الاشياء من حوله دون افكار مسبقة و دون نظريات سابقة ، فلم تكن في عصره قد تزاحمت النظريات و كل تدعي الحقيقة و لا نظريات كثيرة تدعي المعرفة ولا أفكار كثيرة تدعي تفسير كل شيء
و هذا يفسر بجزء منه لماذا سيطرت على عصرنا الحديث الفوض و الضبابية و الغموض و يفسر لماذا انتشرت المذاهب و قلت الأجوبة الحقيقية و الواضحة ،فساد الاضطراب و شاعت المتناقضات و تضاربت الآراء و تزاحمت على الساحة التيارات و الأهواء ،فنفر الناس من السؤال و ماتت الدهشة في النفوس فلحؤوا إلى حياتهم العادية يعيشون في قضاء شؤنهم بعيدا عن التأويلات و بعيدا عن تخرصات المذاهب المتعددة و النماذج المتضاربة و ألمتحارية و استأثرت بالساحة فئة امتهنت و احتكرت قرار الفكر و الثقافة ضاعت المعالم و فقدت الناس الثقة بهذه المؤسسات المتناحرة ، بأس الناس فلاذوا بالهدوء و راحوا يبحثون عن الطمأنينة و عن راحة العقل و تركوا السؤال و روحه الدهشة ماتت الرغبة و حلت في المكان العادة و الرتابة ، يذكر الكتاب أخطاء وقع فيها أرسطو و الحقيقة أن أكبر خطأ واضح وقع فيه أرسطو لا يزل الناس في الشرق كما في الغرب يرددونه ليل نهار و هو تعريفه للإنسان : الإنسان حيوان ناطق.
و المعروف أن ميزة الحيوان إذا جاز التعبير و اعتبار عدم النطق ميزة للحيوان هو أنه لا يتكلم و لا ينطق و التعريف الادق هو ان الإنسان كائن عاقل .
فالنبات و الحيوان و الانسان هم قبل كل شيء كائنات حية و بالتالي فالتعرف الحقيقي و الأقرب إلى الصحة هو كالتالي الإنسان كائن ناطق بدل حيوان ناطق ثم ان الإنسان لا يتميز عن الحيوان بالنطق بل كذلك بالارادة الحرة و بالاختيار الواعي و هو الكائن الوحيد الذي يضحك و هو الوحيد الذي يملك وعيا نوعيا يختلف عن وعي النبات و الحيوان لأنه يعي نفسه و غيره و يخطط للمستقبل لذلك كان التعريف الأقرب إلى الواقع و الحقيقة هو ان تهجر تعريف أرسطو الفاسد و نعتمد التعريف الادق :
الإنسان كائن عاقل .
25/03/21
Yes indeed, Aristotle was a very fertile mind. But was never accepted as a Greek citizen. Many of his works, that have survived can be found at mit.classics.
Austrian music from the 18th century covering an ancient Greek philosopher from the 4th century BC.
Aristotle said - Peri Hermenias/De Interpretatione IV:IV - 'It is impossible then that being a man should mean not being a man - i.e. - it will not be possible to be and not be the same thing' & he takes this conflation of man & thing to consolidate the 'law' [principium] of non-contradiction 'not both A and not-A simultaneously'. In creating Non-Cantorian set theory [= Mengenlehre] I showed quantities not obeying this 'law' & in fact used the Grandi [= Fourier-Bolzano] series = -1 + 1 - 1 + 1 ... as a denumerable isomorphic line to yield the ambiguous sums 0, 1 and 1/2, using the latter to suggest an 'in-betweener' function for different infinities. As non-contradiction is a correlate of tertium exclusi and identity, I considered it evident A = A in Aristotelianism implies A is not subject to 'slippage' - i.e. - it holds to a myth of fixity in which becoming [Gk: gignomai] represses movement. Aristotle himself regarded these 'laws' as without proof & in his first ever logical treatise circa 350 BC its very title Analutika Protera Ln: Analytica Priora equates analutos = solved & episteme = knowing logicality whereas, in fact, solvability is based on the falsehood of no intermediary between contradictory statements. Aristotle's self-evidence for axiomata actually assumes a self which solves [= analuo upo principium tertii exclusi], but I connected recursive, infinite bases - themselves augmentative & thus incomplete - with "human beings", demonstrating mortals are neither human nor beings. Aristotelianism bedevils western ideologies in its Essentialism & it blocks TRANSFIGURATION, whereas Platonism at least indicates homoiosis to theo without, however, knowing how to actually achieve immortalization.
Add your comment
more_vert
sen
Could you do one on Lao Tzu?
What do astronauts get from sitting too much???
Hello
Who taught Alexander
How he die though?
The Moors from North Africa taught him
Or stolen from Kemet...
@@jaredhenderson3062 what’s the premise on that argument( agree Or suggesting that it was only stolen from Kemet
Why am I not in the list?
you're not well known enough or aren't a great thinker, maybe?
Mashallah
Great video but you did a mistake. When Aristotle's parents died, he was cared for by one of his father's friends. Not by his sister. :)
Jeshwe
I'd like to see you host scishow sometime.
I like this format better than scishow. scishow feels too much like a local news segment.
No entiendo nada :v
Kant
Be gone, Destroyer! Concepts are objective, stick your Kategories to the dark ages!
Hallo 10D
I love your videos very much specially Philosophy ones. Please can you create Parmenides video?
Hello
😁👍🏼
Informative. Nice one.🙂
perfectly summerised !!
Hello
Hello