It is your innocent mind for which your voice is full of Devine beauty. Your labour, devotion, sincerity and surrender to the Lotus feet of our Guruji will definitely give you the ultimate peace and happiness in your life though your music. I enjoyed your laykari in Tarana of Raag Jog and thumri was also excellent Wish you all the best..... Joy guru
You are underestimating this generation too much by declaring something like that with too much confidence lmao you should hear Siddharth belamannu,shadaj Iyer, aniruddh aithal first before commenting something like that.
@@apoorv219 the amount of technicall perfection and sur perfection plus bhav he has reached at this age its simply unparalleled, i listen to a lot of classical musicians all day according to me he is the best. but its completely fine if u dont think so
@@ambi234 listen to the names I have mentioned who are also in their early 20s and they aren't inferior to him in any way, I have also listened to a lot of classical singers. I agree that anubhab khamaru is insane in a lot of aspects( bhaav {but others also have that},sur{but kirana musicians are also quite perfect in sur and 2/3 names I mentioned are from kirana} his actual uniqueness is sargam speed definitely & laya again he is excellent no doubt excellent) but I have come to realise that music goes beyond just technicalities that's why I am not too much into patiala style, I like kirana style a lot more hence the point is " it's subjective" hence yes say an artist is best according to you but never generalize like you did as there is no one who is best everyone have their qualities and let me tell you one limitation of anubhab currently - his voice breaks at high notes whereas Siddharth and aniruddh can hit vey high notes effortlessly so again everyone have their strengths and even logically your statement isn't true (as you said "he is", in the sense that your statement is already true not just that it may be true in the future, which would have been true in case he would actually be perfect by now, like salamat Ali khan is a good example of being actually perfect in even his early 20s, but that isn't true since his range is limited currently ).
@@apoorv219we respect your opinion on a positive note but you can't declare Patiala Gharana or any Gharana to be inferior to any other Gharana. And to be specific Patiala Gharana isn't all about technicalities. So please don't place a verdict on the basis of your opinion. All the names that he and you mentioned are few of the most amazing but, don't demean any Gharana ever.
@@sudeeptochakraborty6633 I never said patiala is inferior to kirana I just said I "personally" like kirana style (pt Bhimsen ji like or pt jayteerth mevundi ji like or pt venkatesh kumar ji like kirana to be more specific) more than any other gharana not just patiala but agra,jaipur etc(I know I just mentioned 2, hence the confusion but this is what I meant) ...... And superiority/inferiority talk was started by the original post so in response I said I am not too much into patiala and like kirana more relatively (hence forth particularly telling him that his declaration is simply not true since not all people will agree to it in general as there are other artists in this generation also who are not inferior in anyway in their own styles/gharana since music is very subjective) and the reason I said that was because since anubhab khamaru is super young not even 20 I guess (not sure) hence currently he sings pure patiala style (by patiala again I mean kasur patiala style of ustad bgak, his gayaki I like very much not patiala style before or after {again by after I mean artists of patiala gharana who sing too much high notes as if they are shouting and they feel more influenced by qawwals not bgak also nothing wrong in that some might like that kind of non bgak patiala style more but I fail to understand it musically personally} him though excluding pt Ajoy chakrabarty ofcourse who learned kasur patiala style from ustad bgak son and that same style is passed down to anubhab I am aware of that but still I personally like kirana style of both pt Bhimsenji (I am mentioning it separately because definitely within kirana gharana there is a a separate stream/style of Bhimsenji like kirana now which is different from older style in some aspects) and ustad Akk a bit more , I may sound judgemental here but I believe great artists can belong to any gharana or may not even be bound to a particular gharana strictly(pt kumar Gandharva, pt vasantrao Deshpande are 2 stalwarts of shastriya Sangeet who refused to be bound to any particular gharana for example) basically I like artists more than a gharana, in Carnatic music I don't even think they have any gharana structure hence it's definitely not a necessity just a tradition, also in today's world boundaries of a gharana aren't as strong anyway since there is more exposure to different artists of other Gharana's as well which wasn't there in older times{and this is not just my opinion and your guru pt Ajoy Chakraborty had a similar opinion on gharana in his interview with pt arvind Parikh in which he also said similar things btw like "ustad bgak detergent powder se patiala style ko saaf kia tha" & "pehle ITC SRA me separate gharane ki separate building thi for wo change ho gaya with time"(basically telling his experience of how initial rigidity of Gharanas changed to more musical openness with time in ITC), also to pro gharana people -pt arvind Parikh atleast at the time of interview was quite pro gharana but I completely fail to understand a strict utility of a rigid concept like gharana in today's time} that's just how it is for me sorry if it offends anyone....) ofcourse he will develop his own unique style like all great artists in future and will not remain confined to just his initial gharana but currently he sings within the boundaries set by his gharana hence he needs to overcome that as well to become best or a truly great artist which I do personally believe that he will become(all this I wrote because original post said that he is already best and so on.. hence I was just writing my perspective on that ignorant statement {according to me} hence it may have come across as if I was downplaying on patiala gharana but that isn't really the case hence to summarize - Although I do like kirana more than others but that doesn't mean I think other styles are inferior, Also to become the best I truly believe that any artist belonging to any gharana need to go beyond the boundaries set by the gharana, basically not remain confined to just a particular style so nothing against patiala gharana, since he belongs to patiala gharana(in a loose sense, since he particularly belongs to kasur style but that also belongs to patiala we can't deny that hence Saying that he belongs to patiala isn't wrong, but patiala also have other styles within it which I "personally" don't like so I guess it should be important to distinguish further but nobody goes into this much detailing on TH-cam anyway although I did in this particular comment idk why though lmao) so I just took particular Gharana's name but I truly believe what I said also holds for any artist belonging to any gharana in general).....again if my opinion hurts anyone I apologize but this is what I feel. Also I just listened to your Murali ki dhun,soona soona & laagi lagan and I personally liked your renditions.
It is your innocent mind for which your voice is full of Devine beauty.
Your labour, devotion, sincerity and surrender to the Lotus feet of our Guruji will definitely give you the ultimate peace and happiness in your life though your music. I enjoyed your laykari in Tarana of Raag Jog and thumri was also excellent
Wish you all the best..... Joy guru
Thank you very much sir.Please ask God's favour for my son.
Musical beauty at its own unique best
he is and will be the best classical singer of this generation.
You are underestimating this generation too much by declaring something like that with too much confidence lmao you should hear Siddharth belamannu,shadaj Iyer, aniruddh aithal first before commenting something like that.
@@apoorv219 the amount of technicall perfection and sur perfection plus bhav he has reached at this age its simply unparalleled, i listen to a lot of classical musicians all day according to me he is the best. but its completely fine if u dont think so
@@ambi234 listen to the names I have mentioned who are also in their early 20s and they aren't inferior to him in any way, I have also listened to a lot of classical singers.
I agree that anubhab khamaru is insane in a lot of aspects( bhaav {but others also have that},sur{but kirana musicians are also quite perfect in sur and 2/3 names I mentioned are from kirana} his actual uniqueness is sargam speed definitely & laya again he is excellent no doubt excellent) but I have come to realise that music goes beyond just technicalities that's why I am not too much into patiala style, I like kirana style a lot more hence the point is " it's subjective" hence yes say an artist is best according to you but never generalize like you did as there is no one who is best everyone have their qualities and let me tell you one limitation of anubhab currently - his voice breaks at high notes whereas Siddharth and aniruddh can hit vey high notes effortlessly so again everyone have their strengths and even logically your statement isn't true (as you said "he is", in the sense that your statement is already true not just that it may be true in the future, which would have been true in case he would actually be perfect by now, like salamat Ali khan is a good example of being actually perfect in even his early 20s, but that isn't true since his range is limited currently ).
@@apoorv219we respect your opinion on a positive note but you can't declare Patiala Gharana or any Gharana to be inferior to any other Gharana. And to be specific Patiala Gharana isn't all about technicalities. So please don't place a verdict on the basis of your opinion. All the names that he and you mentioned are few of the most amazing but, don't demean any Gharana ever.
@@sudeeptochakraborty6633 I never said patiala is inferior to kirana I just said I "personally" like kirana style (pt Bhimsen ji like or pt jayteerth mevundi ji like or pt venkatesh kumar ji like kirana to be more specific) more than any other gharana not just patiala but agra,jaipur etc(I know I just mentioned 2, hence the confusion but this is what I meant) ......
And superiority/inferiority talk was started by the original post so in response I said I am not too much into patiala and like kirana more relatively (hence forth particularly telling him that his declaration is simply not true since not all people will agree to it in general as there are other artists in this generation also who are not inferior in anyway in their own styles/gharana since music is very subjective) and the reason I said that was because since anubhab khamaru is super young not even 20 I guess (not sure) hence currently he sings pure patiala style (by patiala again I mean kasur patiala style of ustad bgak, his gayaki I like very much not patiala style before or after {again by after I mean artists of patiala gharana who sing too much high notes as if they are shouting and they feel more influenced by qawwals not bgak also nothing wrong in that some might like that kind of non bgak patiala style more but I fail to understand it musically personally} him though excluding pt Ajoy chakrabarty ofcourse who learned kasur patiala style from ustad bgak son and that same style is passed down to anubhab I am aware of that but still I personally like kirana style of both pt Bhimsenji (I am mentioning it separately because definitely within kirana gharana there is a a separate stream/style of Bhimsenji like kirana now which is different from older style in some aspects) and ustad Akk a bit more , I may sound judgemental here but I believe great artists can belong to any gharana or may not even be bound to a particular gharana strictly(pt kumar Gandharva, pt vasantrao Deshpande are 2 stalwarts of shastriya Sangeet who refused to be bound to any particular gharana for example) basically I like artists more than a gharana, in Carnatic music I don't even think they have any gharana structure hence it's definitely not a necessity just a tradition, also in today's world boundaries of a gharana aren't as strong anyway since there is more exposure to different artists of other Gharana's as well which wasn't there in older times{and this is not just my opinion and your guru pt Ajoy Chakraborty had a similar opinion on gharana in his interview with pt arvind Parikh in which he also said similar things btw like "ustad bgak detergent powder se patiala style ko saaf kia tha" & "pehle ITC SRA me separate gharane ki separate building thi for wo change ho gaya with time"(basically telling his experience of how initial rigidity of Gharanas changed to more musical openness with time in ITC), also to pro gharana people -pt arvind Parikh atleast at the time of interview was quite pro gharana but I completely fail to understand a strict utility of a rigid concept like gharana in today's time} that's just how it is for me sorry if it offends anyone....) ofcourse he will develop his own unique style like all great artists in future and will not remain confined to just his initial gharana but currently he sings within the boundaries set by his gharana hence he needs to overcome that as well to become best or a truly great artist which I do personally believe that he will become(all this I wrote because original post said that he is already best and so on.. hence I was just writing my perspective on that ignorant statement {according to me} hence it may have come across as if I was downplaying on patiala gharana but that isn't really the case hence to summarize - Although I do like kirana more than others but that doesn't mean I think other styles are inferior, Also to become the best I truly believe that any artist belonging to any gharana need to go beyond the boundaries set by the gharana, basically not remain confined to just a particular style so nothing against patiala gharana, since he belongs to patiala gharana(in a loose sense, since he particularly belongs to kasur style but that also belongs to patiala we can't deny that hence Saying that he belongs to patiala isn't wrong, but patiala also have other styles within it which I "personally" don't like so I guess it should be important to distinguish further but nobody goes into this much detailing on TH-cam anyway although I did in this particular comment idk why though lmao) so I just took particular Gharana's name but I truly believe what I said also holds for any artist belonging to any gharana in general).....again if my opinion hurts anyone I apologize but this is what I feel.
Also I just listened to your Murali ki dhun,soona soona & laagi lagan and I personally liked your renditions.
❤❤
Vah kitni Mulayam gay ki hai pranam
Promising talent. Jog interpreted beautifully.
Exceptional musician produced by Pt Ajay Chakrabarty. He has god gifted capacity to surpass his guru's earlier student musicians.
Great. Let me know his Guru and Gharana
Anubhav is the disciple of Padmabhusan Pandit Ajoy Chakraborty ji.
Excellent! You have a great future. Blessings!
What an amazing talent! May Ma Saraswati bless you!
wah, kya baat hai. Lovely recital. Keep it up. God bless you.👋
🙏🙏what an amazing rendition. ❤️
So effortless and soothing...
Overuse of sargam is a plague. Completely detaches one from the feeling of the raag and presents vocal jugglery.
Great. Let me know his Guru and Gharana
@@madhuvasudevan6070 Ajoy Chakraborty and Patiala.
Sorry i meant Ajai sir
The harmonium and tanpura suppresses the voice .
The same musical circus
❤❤