This is a video explaining very early Islamic history. It is meant purely for educational purposes, not preachy. So please keep the comment section civil or I will bring out the Banhammer (no personal insults, no discrimination, etc.). Frequent Comments Answered 1. The reason for this older art style is that I made this series of videos back in 2017. They are unlisted because I use this channel as a portfolio and due to the taboo nature of the subject decided to unlist them for a while. But that's no longer necessary so here they are again! 2. Did you become a Muslim? - No. the point of this video is to explain the worldview of a mythology which isn't covered a lot. It's meant for people who, as with all my other videos, don't know a lot about the subject and want to learn more. 3. You're not allowed to draw this - Yes I am. Free speech is protected by law in my country, Ireland (where google is registered for EU citizens), and the USA (where this platform is located). 4. You shouldn't draw Muhammad because it's offensive to some people - Well, then don't watch the video if you find it offensive. This video is educational for a non-Muslim audience. You cannot expect people to conform to your own religious beliefs, just as I won't demand you to conform to mine. 5. Any form of (death) threat - please email them to me directly. Add the subject line "death threat" so I can delete it immediately. ...please stop acting so childish... Most of us haven't made silly death threats since we were angsty teenagers. 6. Parts are inaccurate - There are various denominations of Islam, so I chose the middle ground on which most sources agree, favouring actual historical sources over mythological ones. So if you learned or heard something else then it might be because that particular denomination believes differently.
Ps, the best thing about the TH-cam banhammer is that you can "hide" someone. So any comment or reply they make will be hidden on all my videos. They will still see their own comments and replies, but nobody else will. Of course, I don't use it often, but it's such a perfect option for the rude people.
Thank you for explaining all of this :) I was wondering what is going on, as I hadn't seen this before. Watching it now :D Edit: I found the visual gag with the elephant absolutely hilarious. I liked the video, thank you for it :)
its sad that people have let terrorism dictate what they will draw. animation allows for an explanation and understanding of history, that reading and spoken word does not. this video is dope af.
you know what you do is *Wrong* , you said: " Ps, the best thing about the TH-cam banhammer is that you can "hide" someone. So any comment or reply they make will be hidden on all my videos. They will still see their own comments and replies, but nobody else will. Of course, I don't use it often, but it's such a perfect option for the rude people."
I went to a catholic high school and suprisingly the religion class actually had a chapter teaching about other religions and cults. And they were suprisingly neutral when discussing other religions
Common misconception about muslims is that they are to hate people who dont belive in islam thats actually wrong we are supposed to try to convert them to islam but if we cant convert them we can still be friends with them so we 'dont have a dont be friend with people who belive in other religion rule'
I think that’s the best think I got from my religious up bringing, not so much learning about That religion but understanding are away from politics and social issues
@Halim Yacob one other way to go to jannah is by being a mortyer basically getting killed in a war that has been started for the reasons that allah approves of to start a war.
@@real_Pinoy ok first thats rude to the religion and to its people second terrosim is not what we do the idiots like bin laden did the bad shit because they are say it with me "idiots that kill people "in the name of islam" while islam doesnt even approve of ittttt" kind of a mouthful isnt it?
Honestly as a muslim myself this video taught me things that i didn’t know, great job on the research and objectiveness, however one mistake you made is that muhammed (pbuh) never actually wrote the Quran himself because as you said he was illiterate, it was rather Abu Bakr Al Seddik who wrote down the Quran for the first time
Rached Ben nasr no to be more precise there was a number of companions who wrote the verses of Quran and during the time of Abu Bakr those writing were assembled into the book known as Quran.
@@mikado6407 He only did so as to not leave censored bars across the screen, i understand your religious vigor but disliking such a well made video is alot
Originally the Quran was meant to be orally passed down through generations but many Muslims were warriors and so many of them died in warfare that entire parts of the Quran were being lost so it became required to record it.
* be open minded * he had sex with a 9 year old girl * he took his adopted sons wife and made adoption haram * countless killings in the name of a false god his ancestors worshipped * he thought the trinity consisted of the Father, the Son and the Mother, somehow all-knowing Allah didn't know about the Holy Spirit * smh islamophobic
None of your replies trigger me. You must assume I am Muslim based off of my name. I left Islam and am no longer a follower. However it wasn't silly edgy commentary that you continue here that pushed me to do so.
Belligerent people have no curiosity. And this is the sort of video you only watch (as a non Muslim person with no stake in the religion) if you are a curious person.
Be as curious as you like, but once you put 1 and 1 together you can not unsee. Read the qu'ran and prove your curiosity. Muhammad's acts were just as wrong as any other barbarism at the time. Being stuck in a mindset, a religion stuck in these times, objectively proves that something is wrong with you. Either brainwashed, stupid or evil. It's the antithesis to atheism, which people only "convert" to by their own volition and rationale. Deal with the truth.
@@googleuser9383 One thing I came away from this video with, are some of the various strategies that were employed in battle and diplomacy in the story. Sure, you might call that "barbarism", but it's something you can apply very easily to things in your life such as dealing with adversarial colleagues at work. I'm saying this as an atheist myself. There's a reason these stories have a mass appeal. You need to be able to extract these core aspects of different religions in order to understand how the people around you work. You can learn a lot about your neighbor living in a christian suburb in Georgia by reading an ancient Chinese text.
I’m a Christian, and I believe Muhammad existed. While I don’t agree with his interpretation of God’s will and the history of Judaism and Christianity, or the religious laws he established, I can appreciate his attempt to bring people back into harmony with the God of Abraham. Also, you forgot to mention the part of Islamic history where their followers were early on violently persecuted in Mecca, and were forced to flee to Abyssinia (modern-day Ethiopia), where the Christian king welcomed the followers of this new religious sect and protected them from attempts by the pagan Meccans to extradite them.
By the way, this video made it through the manual review process of TH-cam and is actually monitized. I'm probably as surprised about that as you are. So good job TH-cam for realising the educational intent of this video!
@Jack Blade Out of curiosity - not insult - what denomination teaches that/where did you hear it? Avery could very well be wrong in saying 3, being a non-Muslim himself, but I want to research it myself
@@vexxcon8125 Thanks but I was asking the person who replied "Muslims can take 4 wives not 3 you dolt" because I want to know 1 who he was insulting anyway and 2 where he got that number from
Been a member of this channel for awhile now. Have been to the Middle East and fought in many wars. I think you portrayed it fair and even, identifying things that are misconceptions and truths.
If the Qu'ran says it is the true word of god - as it is written - and it punishes everyone who denies it with death, how is modern/moderate islam not wrong by definition? Their own holy book says they're atheist. Muhammad is just like Karl Marx. Even IF he meant well, he put the world through a lot of suffering.
This is such a controversial subject I congratulate anyone that has the nerve to gives it a go. I would never even attempt it myself as my knowledge of Mohamed is little but your portrayal of the man in my oppinion makes his teachings more approachable. Keep up the good work, thanks.
Did he include the fact that Muhammad didn't write down the qur'an but was assembled after his death and was preserved through memorization and word-of-mouth
I love your channel. It's one of the only ones I have found that don't display a heavy bias. You're quickly growing to one of my favorite history channels. Keep it up!
The Quran and all the Islamic books didn't proclaimed God as a man nor female but the discribed God as a *HE/HIM* What I'm trying to say is they there was no description of God as a man with genitalia they just implied that God is a male
@@apooto1553 In Arabic, when you're referring to a situation, a phenomenon or something with an anonymous gender, it's usually the male pronouns that are used. So basically in English, one would say "one is, one might etc." in Arabic, that "one" is described as male. It's just a language thing.
Well, this isn’t a detailed drawing of Muhammad. So I think it’s probably alright. Honestly, if I would complain about a drawing it’s probably the drawing of god. Though, I wouldn’t come and insult anyone. I’d just suggest to change it to light instead of an old man with wings and abs.
Most Muslims seems to be fine with it. You know why? Because the intent was not to deliberately be insulting or degrading but instead to have a productive discussion about and exploration of a delicate subject. These things matter and make a huge difference...
Actually no. Lots of Muslims have already sent waves of insults and threats. TH-cam or myself simply remove those comments so you guys don't have too see them.
@@HistoryScope well, okay, maybe half of the Muslims out there might raise an eyebrow or an objection at the portrayal on second thought. I personally did not think you were trying to be malicious. It is just one of those topics where you're going to get a ton of insults and threats regardless of what you say
Good video. There are several inaccuracies however that i will list for you. The Tribe that Muhammad belonged to is Quraish (which effectively ruled Mecca) but he is a member of the Banu Hashim clan. Tribe-->Clan-->Family A Muslim man is allowed to marry up to 4 wives not 3. Also Kahdeeja was 15 years older than Muhammad, not 20. On a side note, It is true that Aisha's marriage was considered controversial even back then but Aisha herself grew to be the most powerful and intelligent woman in Muslim history, many of the Hadiths Muslims follow are credited to her as she was the first who heard them and wrote them down. When others criticized Muhammad for marrying her young she would scold them and take pride of the fact rather than shame. Now my biggest issue with this video is not these mistakes, nor that you chose to portray prophets and God. My biggest issue the subject you brought up about the existence of Muhammad himself. This is a very weird thing to even mention since your only argument is that there are no written records of him existing. You do realize that unlike Jesus, Muhammad lived in the backwater region of Arabia where there was no central government at all to make censors, like the Romans, nor where there many literate people to write those records. Arab tradition is entirely oral and only after Islam did they start a written tradition. If everyone in the Arabian peninsula at the time can attest to the existence of one man, albeit verbally, then there is no doubt that he did exist. Unless you are accusing thousands of people who lived at the time of being subject to a mass hallucination. There is also the fact that millions of people around the world are descended from him and Muhammad does have a family tree that links him to other people. Other than the aforementioned, i agree with most of the info you provided in the video. I would grade it as a solid B.
@@Subsidize101 2 things, first he married woman out of respect mostly over love second he didn't physically touch her till she was what was considered legal age bacl then oh and she was daughter of a king so that marriage helped spread islam
I can't help but think there should be some kind of "middle ground" religion between Islam, Christian, and Judaism religions since they share a fair deal of common ground.
Its was not 3 years of not hearing a revelation as it would not be possible in the given timeline of his live. Top islamic scholars agreed it may have been 3 months.
one important fact you need to correct, is that Muhammad didnt write anything himself and he hired scribes to write and compile the Quran. also the Quran came down at a long period of time and was shared by Muhammad to his Sahabah who memorized the verses word by word until it was written. also the acted as checks and balances for each other as the arabs at the time since they were mostly illiterate had an amazing memorizing skill to recite poems and stories. but overall great video. you are an enlightened person to try and understand and learn about the whole world and from multi-lens approach.
Just one key fact for me... the entity in the cave never identified himself. Some one else, who was not present in the cave, told Muhammed who the entity was. So he assumed it from that point on.
Muslims brought so much knowledge to Europe and contributed much to Hispanic culture since many of the Spanish immigrants to the New World (including my own) were Andalusian. Muslims are my brothers and I am greatly indebted to their influence on the combined Hispanic culture.
Southern Spain has always been a crossroad of culture. Before them the goths thre romans the carthaginians the Greeks. The phoenicians built many of the first cities like cadiz or Sevilla, or malaga Gibraltar or ibiza.
just to clarify something about the taxes which a lot of people get wrong christians and jews have to pay tax called jezia but muslims people have to pay "zakah" which is a percentage of their money given to help the poor and this zakah is only required from muslim so the jezia is like the alternative for zakah
@Fruit Shake Loooooool. The bible is not a magical book of truth. Sorry honey. Lots of its prophecies don't come true Don't call the Christian god good when he was never against slavery and he thinks it's OK to burn people in hell for eternity. I'm not everlastingly good and I couldn't even do that - meaning Yahweh is evil.
@@DontKnow-lz1vh Calling for killing gays, not ending slavery, threatening people with hell should they refuse to convert, saying that the word of a woman is a third as important as that of a man and saying men can beat their wives. That's some of the evil in the Qur'an. BUUUUUT, that's not unique to the Qur'an. All of that evil is more or less in the bible and torah too. All three of the religions are evil - Christianity, Islam and Judaism. It doesn't mean the practitioners are. Most Christians, Muslims and Jews never fully read their holy books so they don't act out or even know of the evil parts so that's good at least.
Some of point in this video a high condensed, minimize and sometimes wrong. 1. You drawn Abu Bakar and Ali feuding with each (at some point in the video) other is will fully wrong. In actual fact Ali and Abu Bakar never feud with each other their follower did. When Abu Bakar ascended as the leader for Islam, he himself visited Ali and asked to not to have any bad blood between them. Ali with all his greatest does not harbour judgement toward him. 2. 27:33 Yeah Muhammad never able to participated in the Muslim conquest because he is dead. Those conquest are mainly been done by his successor or the Rashidun Caliphate. That's why there's never a source mentioned him during the conquest because he is already dead. Muhammad only manage to unite all the tribe and Arabia that's all. 3. 27:43 Saying that Islamic sources can't be trusted so Muhammad does not exist is ignorant. In this case Sun Zhu does not exist because it a Chinese sources. There's not other sources saying that he exist he might be a myth. See what I'm saying. Yes a lot of the Islamic sources might be highly exaggerated, but to disqualify all of the sources is dumb.
As a Muslim myself, I must say you did a pretty good job putting this all together in 30 minutes. I find some of what you said inaccurate, but then again that is only natural as there is a lot out there about Muhammad and much dispute exists surrounding certain stories. I would like to ask, after making this video what is your view of Muhammad? Do you view him as a genuinely good man as Muslims do or do you view him more as a power hungry pervert charlatan as he is often portrayed in the West?
Please ignore any comment on pictures. You tried your best to portray what you could. You tried your best. You missed something but you you got many things spot on. The point is you did your best. Cheers! Your muslim sub from Pakistan.
great video, although there are too many mistakes or misconceptions that even some muslims still believe in. but still you can never get the full true story
There are alot of things that some muslims will agree on and others disagree if something is a sin and you did it without knowing it is a sin you will not be held accountable
Even though that I consider myself as a conservative Muslim and yes I might disagree with you on some of the pictures or drawing used in this video. However, I admire your academic honesty and the pure intention behind creating such a video. I wish you the best of luck wherever you go my friends :) (subscribed already !)
Islam prohibits muslims from drawing living beings their is no rule on drawing the prophet for non muslim especially the way he drew the prophet it was not in a tone of mockery.
As a Muslim, I appreciate the historical unbiased view of a non-Muslim towards the Muslim faith. Some misconceptions do exist in this video but they outweigh most of the truths. Thank you for making this video for educational purposes so others have a better understanding of where we come from.
@Joshua Davis Please stop spreading false rhetoric. None of what you say is true. You should be ashamed of yourself for hurting other people. You're not a good person. Learn some humanity.
8:49 mohammad did not write down he literally cant read nor write just memorised among people and recited every day like nowadays.true form is recitation written is for young ones benifit.
While this guy is painting Islam in nice colors every one should know that Turkey is reintroducing a bill whereby a person will be allowed to marry his victim irrespective of age. Other Arab states are are also expected to follow suit or have similar laws. This is debacle of humanity and we all should be held responsible for the young lives sacrificed to this madness.
I love how so many religions start with god or a messenger of god communicating his will to one illiterate dude who is completely alone. Dozens of religions have started this way. And I'm sure more will come.
Clown athiest. Foolish clown. there are problems with your argument. Firstly it is self defeating. Pretty much, if causality cannot exist without time then Big Bang should be rejected. Given that at the point of singularity there was no time, but boundary to time, and that boundary is obviously causally connected to the rest of the universe, then how can this causal relation make sense? If the objectors accept this point that the boundary is causally connected to the rest of the universe, they should also accept that the boundary is same a temporal causal relation when God decided to manifest His will and Power to create the universe. If you maintain that causality doesn't make sense outside of time, then you'll have to reject causal relation between boundary of the singularity to the rest of the universe, which is pretty much rejecting the bloody existence of the universe. Secondly it assumes there is a consensus on the notion of time in science. There are different notions of time in quantum mechanics and relativ
How could the Quran have existed before Muhammad had written it? You said at the siege of Medina the assaulting army had hurled "Quranic" phrases and insults at the defenders of the city, of which Muhammad controlled. Given he himself couldn't read, and based on the oppositions leaders feelings toward the prophet it seems unlikely they were converts to his new religion.
And then what happens when the next person comes along and says .." you know what? I think God has just told me to write this down and here's the updated version " ...What then eh ?
Well even if you don't believe in Islam but just by going with Abrahamic religion concepts we know about many prophets like Adam, Noah, Lot, David, Abraham, Ishmael, Issac, Moses, Jesus and many others we already know about but then Muhammad at the end declared through Quran that He is the last of Prophets and there won't be any coming except the return of Jesus followed by the Anti Christ which will mark the beginning of doomsday.
In the farewell sermon Muhammed Peace be Upon him was quoting Allah/ God when he said "O humanity I have completed my favour upon you and chosen islam as Religion for you" it was not his words. He was just delivering the mesaage.
4:50 Mohammad did run home and was sick of what happen. but it wasn't his wife who told him that he is a prophet it was a Jewish doctor who told him by the meaning " you speak of what Joseph has brought to us "
I will write down the mistakes in this video in this dread while watchin it. Let me first start with the fact that Muhammad was illiterate as you mentioned during your story about the first encounter Muhammad had with the Arch Angel. But then around 8:45 you say that the Quran was 'written down literally, word for word, by Muhammad'. This was not correct.
Just a thought...you said you lived in Ireland. But your accent is anything but Irish. I think it sounds very Dutch. Your S's and your L's just give it away. Or am I terribely wrong?
Regarding Prophet's marriage to Aysha(ra): In the 'Age of Consent Act'(1891),the age of consent for girls was increased from 10 to 12 years old. In 1880, 37 states of America had an age of consent at 10 years old. Roman law 100 B.C brides were 12 years old . •St Augustine from 10 years old 350 A.D •King Richard second married 7 years old at 1396 •In 1791 Frances Napoleonic code set marriage of consent 11 years old . •1880 USA, Delaware minimum age to get marry was 7 years old and California age of 10 years . In the ancient time women had to marry early for two reasons: 1. There was too much wars and so they needed to reproduce faster as average life expectancy wasn't high . 2. They didn't have to go to schools, college or University like today that could spend their 16 years of life. So they were married off earlier. It was our human history throughout the world. Even today the minimum age of marriage differs from place to place, Parental consent is needed in Alabama and Utah at age 14, while in Nebraska and Oregon, the age is 17. In New Hampshire, the ages at which you may get married with parental consent are 14 for males and 13 for females.
I think we all agree that 6 years old to marry and 9 year old to have sex is fundamentally wrong on so many levels. How could a prophet of God think it's ok to have sex with a child... Either God thinks it's ok or Muhammed wasn't a prophet!!!!
@@bigafrojames Read my full comment. It was our human history marrying early. In ancient time we didn't have school, college, Uni etc. to spend our early life. What we had is war. To win the war you gotta reproduce faster. The average life expectancy of a woman was around 40. That's why early marriage was very common. Moreover, this marriage was proposed by the father of Aysha, best friend of prophet [pbuh] himself. Her marriage was already engaged with her cousin(Cousin marriage was common even before 1800). If prophet didn't marry her, she would be married with her cousin anyway. It is worth mentioning that most of the wives of the prophet was 30+ years old. Man had more than one wives because woman usually didn't take part in war. So the number of woman was much higher. Book of Jasher chapter: 24 40 And the young woman was of very comely appearance, she was a virgin, and *Rebecca was ten years old* in those days. 45 And *Isaac was forty years old* when he took Rebecca, the daughter of his uncle Bethuel, for a wife. Some people may argue that as she was fetching water so she cannot be that young. You've to understand today's 10 years old and thousand years before 10 years old aren't the same. People used to mature faster physically. Moreover,Mary the mother of Jesus was 12-14 years old when she gave birth to Jesus (Source: Matthew:A Shorter Commentary by Dale C. Allison). Even among the popular historical figure - 33 year old King John of England married 12 years old Isabella. Margaret Beaufort gave birth to Henry Tudor at the age of 13 (1457).In the play of Romeo-Juliet,Juliet was 13. Joan of France, Duchess of Berry was betrothed at 8 days old and married at the age of 12. 1. Professor of history Margaret Wade Labarge “It needs to be remembered that many Medieval widows were not old, Important heiresses were often married between the ages of 5 and 10 and might find themselves widowed while still in their teens.” 2. Professor Richard Wortley and Professor Stephen Smallbone, both of whom state that prior to the 1900s girls married very young, “In Medieval and early modern European societies, the age of marriage remained low, with documented cases of brides as young as seven years, although marriages were typically not consummated until the girl reached puberty (Bullough 2004). Shakespeare’s Juliet was just 13, and there is no hint in the play that this was considered to be exceptional. The situation was similar on the other side of the Atlantic; Bullough reports the case in 1689 of a nine-year-old bride in Virginia. At the start of the nineteenth century in England, it was legal to have sex with a 10 year-old girl.” 3. In the book, ‘Sex and Society’, “Until the late 20th century U.S. age of consent laws specifically names males as perpetrators and females as victims. Following English law, in which the age was set at 12 in 1275 and lowered to 10 in 1576, ages of consent in the American colonies were generally set at 10 or 12. The laws protected female virginity, which at the time was considered a valuable commodity until marriage. The theft of a girl’s chastity was seen as a property crime against her father and future husband. If two people were married and had sex, no matter what their age, no crime was committed because a woman was her husband’s property. In practice, too, the consent laws only protected white females, as many non-white females were enslaved or otherwise discriminated against by the legal system.” 4. Richard A. Posner is chief judge of the U.S court of appeals, Seventh Circuit Chicago. Katherine B. Silbaugh is associate Professor at Boston University School of Law, they say that before the 1900s age of consent was ten years old, “The law governing the age of consent has changed dramatically in the United States during this century. Most states codified a statutory age of consent during the nineteenth century, and the usual age was ten years.” 5. The Scottish Law prior to 1900s by Sir John Comyns and Stewart Kyd, “By the law of Scotland, a woman cannot contrabere sponsalia before her age of seven years. 1 Rol. 343. I. 20. But by common law, persons may marry at any age. Co. Lit. 33. A. And upon such marriage the wife shall be endowed, if the attain the age of nine years, of what whatsoever age her husband be; but not before the age of nine years. Co. L. 33. A.” 6. Professor of Sociology Anthony Joseph Paul Cortese says that a 50 year old man being with a girl under 10 (being intimate) Under United States law was legal until the mid 1960s, “In 1962, the American Law Institute recommended that the legal age of consent to sex- that is, the age below which sex is defined as statutory rape- be dropped in every state to age 10 (Katchadourian and Lund 1972: 439). In fact, until the mid 1960's, the legal age of consent in Delaware was 7 (Kling, 1965: 216). So a 50 year old man could legally have sexual intercourse with a 7 year old boy or girl.”
Im a muslim and i absolutely give 0 shits about you drawing anybody. Ignoring the people who have a 7th century caveman islam mentality is the best way going around this. Have s great day love your videos
Or even better: let people live their lives the way they want to live their lives. Instead of enforcing hetero normative relationships. Most gay men are MUCH happier with another man. Most gay women are MUCH happier with another woman, etc.
As a Muslim, I feel okay regarding drawing the prophet, and the I believe this law meant to not create idols to worship because in Arabic idols and images could be referred in the same word. On the other hand, I feel this video is not educational rather it is referring to one belief of what is the true story. Regarding to the sources, and I'm bragging, before the bloom of Islamic sciences there were not a thing called a source or a methodology of criticism and to be objective in the research. All of this came as result of an order made by God (which is Allah in Arabic, so no need to say Allah if you are talking in English) to wonder the creation of the human and sounding creatures, and criticize information until reaching clarity. Regarding Man can beat women, this is so not true and it's punched by every law in every country, and the only mention of this is from AN ISLAMIC SOURCE that a guy approached the prophet to sattel a disagreement with his wife, and prophet mentioned several steps reach intervention of family members of each side, and if this did not work he till him to hit her with a small stick not bigger than a finger leaving no pain or a mark as a symbol of high level of disagreement of her act! One more thing, the rights you've mentioned. Non Muslims we willing to pay a tax for defense, and this obligate that Muslims to die if this what it takes to defend those tax payers and citizens of the Islamic country or runs by an Islamic administration. Only terrorists and you agree that not believers in God are different than believers and they should be treated differently. Just want to advise you to not create educational content using this mindset, and to study more about the topic before. What you've done is what causing fundamentalists to be more fundamental and this mean more extreme then more terror, and this applies not only with Islam, but with any belief or ideology
OKAY. UM. MEN CANNOT BEAT THEIR WIVES. AT ALL. PERIOD. They can *symbolically* hit their wives with a thing called a miswak (which is basically the same pain as hitting them with a handkerchief) and it *cannot* hurt. It is meant symbolically, and not to cause pain. And secondly, *we do not know the age of ‘Aisha.* The biography of her sister says that ‘Aisha was married at 19 to Muhammad (SAW) and not 6-7. She absolutely was not that young, but we can’t know her exact age. It was most likely that she was around 19.
Five pillars of Islam 1 the two testimonies that Allah is the only god and Muhammad his prophet 2 keeping up the prayers 3 giving alms 4 fasting the month of Ramadan 5 making a pilgrimage once a lifetime if the person is Abel with money and health
there are some problems i have with the video but the drawing of Muhammed PBUH is not one of them lol. good video nonetheless though some of the information in it is still debated among muslim scholars :D
Good work my friend, I believe many will research more and bring out the historical facts of the Islamic wars instead of the indoctrinative ones. I am a Muslim but open minded. I am not stupid but respect anyone who has the courage to search for knowledge and truth. I question the scriptures myself at least that is what the Quran says, 'question the scriptures'
I stopped watching when History Scope lied that the Prophet's Uncle did not love him and when he lied and said that the Prophet Muhammed wanted to commit suicide by throwing himself off the mountain. Please do proper research or don't speak.
Muhammad did not fight only Mecca, but every tribes around him. He said that he lived from robbing caravans, and that his god commanded him to fight against believers of other faiths, mass executing them, while enslaving their women and children. He assassinated his criticizers around Medina for criticizing him, including a mother of five. He ordered apostates to be executed, he himself ordered cut of feet and hands and to make blind some apostases to leave them die. He was not just a pedophile, genocider and womaniser, but also a caravan-robber warlord, a terrorist, a slave trader and a rapist. Nice example...
The only pagan symbols are the black sstone that is kissed, which Umar said he knows benefits no one. the trekking between safa and marwah hills where the two idol shrines were located and which even the early muslims were uncomfortable to do but allah made legal. Read your history. Islam is ancient pagan arabian worship except mohammed removed all the other gods from the ka'ba. Everything else is as practiced before
8:25 The Quran tells of 25 Messenger and many Prophets Muhammad said when ask about how many he said " they are more than 300 messengers of god and 125000 prophets"
@@freecitizen2760 by your logic our prayer is also negotiating and shirk since we ask for healing from disease and success in work and life Allah is merciful and kind to his creation and he gave Mohammed and the Muslims and humanity many favors one of which ease of rituals
for confirmation : 1. the birth doesn't have anything special except the incident before the birth and the prophices around it 2. the common sense at that time is much much worse than today time and the video doesn't list them all (since it is not the topic) 3. the reason why there is no third party or other sources is because most of the men in that time have job that are military based job or skill based job only a little have a knowledge based job, most of sources will be adapted by the muslim because at the time only the muslim had interest in that, and since this is a normal occurence in that time people just saw it as another tribal war
Thank you for clarifying! I have a question: in reference to your 3rd point, during the Golden Age of Islam (approximately the years 700-1300), do you think Muslim historians might have destroyed third party sources in order to confirm their own beliefs, or do you think the problem is that there were few third party sources in the first place? For me, having grown up in a European and Christian-based culture, I know that the Catholic church suppressed and quieted a lot of scientific and historical knowledge so they could protect their beliefs from being proved wrong, during the Middle Ages (almost exactly the same time as the Muslim Golden age!), but I've never been taught if Muslim scholars misrepresented their history in a similar way, or to a similar extent. I think all people can be stubborn sometimes, and ignore new information to hold onto old beliefs, but the destruction in the Middle Ages was rather systematic and political.
@@zozzy4630 1. there might or might not be. because the muslim historian has their own bias and circumstances at the time. 2. at the time muhammad doesn't really that famous only the mostly only arab know him until when he created the nation that people start to notice him and the europe start thinking he is a threat but at the time he did he already old and then passed away. 3. the arab world were still at comparable is look very alike europe dark age at the time and because the islamic golden age that jumpstart the era of the arab world to be comparable to the late middle ages of europe. most of history before the golden age of muslim are either gone, missing, get destroyed in war or maybe intentional erasing. just like dark age of europe 4. the muslim at this time doesn't really searching for the third party source since the quran mostly is their primary source for history of muhammad life and from other sources beside that only a small fraction are written mostly are hearsay passed down from previous generation (because at the time the arab have a really low literacy rate)
@Phil Weatherley eh, I'm the one who asked and I still understood what he meant. English probably isn't his first language, and that's fine: I'd rather that response than if he just typed it in his native language and I had to rely on Google translate or something. And to be fair, I was asking for his opinion, not necessarily a well-researched response on behalf of any group's beliefs. It was enough for me to use as a stepping stone for more research, and that's all I needed, really. I can link some works if you're genuinely curious, though.
@Phil Weatherley education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2133/Islam.html (History of Islamic education) www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t243/e275 (History of the Qur'an, including its influence on early Muslim education and especially literacy) www.islamicmanuscripts.info/reference/articles/Wasserstein-1990-Library-MME5.pdf (A historical work about the library of early Andalusian ruler al-Hakam II. Note that it was destroyed soon after al-Hakam II's death in a push towards greater orthodoxy in Islam, with scholars at the time viewing many of the philosophical and theological works in it to be heretical.) And of course, a few Wiki lists of early historiographical works of the Muslim world and early Muslim historical scholars: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historiography_of_early_Islam en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_historians#The_historians_of_the_formative_period You'll see in the first one, there are a few references to scholars stating that many historical accounts written by Muslim historians during the Islamic Golden Age are contradicted by contemporary outsider sources, at least when it comes to the inception of the religion around the 7th-8th centuries. If you take a closer look at some of those sources, they affirm that this is probably evidence of embellishment or misrepresentation on the part of those Golden-Age Islamic scholars; though of course, evidence shouldn't be confused for definitive proof. I wasn't able to find any specific references to any major systematic destruction of early historical works, but many Islamic libraries were destroyed either insularly (e.g., the library of Rayy, and the library of al-Hakam II, mentioned above) or by outsiders, especially during the Crusades (e.g., the library of Banu Ammar, Dar al-'ilm).
correction Banu qurayza, a jewish tribe was bound by the constitution to help defend Medina against any enemy that attacks the city but they betrayed Muslims and shut themselves in their fort.
I never got no depiction of prophets or god for educational purposes , I was tought depiction of god or prophet is wrong because people will make idol of them
One of many errors; No one has ever had a direct conversation or seen Allah,a part flm Musa A.S(moises) who was able to talk with him. The prophets had jeebril (gabriel) as a messenge between them.
29:05 - what a nonsense. First - the key from Kaaba has been taken from Ibn Talha by force and returned after ayah has been revealed with command to return it to Uthman Ibn Talha who didn't expect it to happen.
The video has many errors: I will mention a few of them, for example: A man marries 4 women, not 3. And that the Messenger, peace be upon him, wrote the Qur’an, this is wrong, as he does not know how to read or write. The story that the Messenger Muhammad, peace be upon him, wanted to commit suicide. This is a piece of news without a reliable source, and this is not recognized in the hadiths because the hadiths are based on sources. And that men beat their husbands, this is true, but this is when they disobey their husbands ... and the beating is not as you portrayed it in the video, and you can search on Google for the condition of beating their husbands in Islam, as it does not leave marks ... and the Messenger, peace be upon him, said to those who beat women that they are not the best of people There are hadiths that explain that he prefers not to be beaten ... The evidence for this is that Muhammad, peace be upon him, did not hit his wives ... And another evidence that you said yourself was that in his last sermon he recommended treating women with good. And the last request, can you give me the source that says that Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq and Ali bin Abi Talib were at odds? I don’t know .. some mistakes I feel you made for lack of careful research, but some mistakes like hitting women, I feel you put them on purpose.
@@HistoryScope You said that you did this video and there may be errors because there are different sects and you chose the middle ... well can you name the sect that says that the maximum number of wives is 3?
Yes. Don’t like the fact that Prophet Muhammad ( pbuh) has been depicted. There are also quite a few mistakes in this video. I wouldn’t call it a reliable source to learn from.
In 24:34 you made a mistake : Men are not allowed to beat their wifes in Islam and if the wife gets beaten she has the righ to go to the loyer and ask him to divorce her from her husband and here the loyer HAS to do it
But why the god allah said that humans have to pray 5 times . I guess preying is not important . Most important is doing good things for all not humans but for everybody . Then god will be very happy. If someone doing bad for anyone god will be hurt .... Humanity is most important than any religion ...
many differences between your research and what we've been taught in the textbooks in our school life ...anyway, it is the same in terms of eventual results..!
This is a video explaining very early Islamic history. It is meant purely for educational purposes, not preachy. So please keep the comment section civil or I will bring out the Banhammer (no personal insults, no discrimination, etc.).
Frequent Comments Answered
1. The reason for this older art style is that I made this series of videos back in 2017. They are unlisted because I use this channel as a portfolio and due to the taboo nature of the subject decided to unlist them for a while. But that's no longer necessary so here they are again!
2. Did you become a Muslim? - No. the point of this video is to explain the worldview of a mythology which isn't covered a lot. It's meant for people who, as with all my other videos, don't know a lot about the subject and want to learn more.
3. You're not allowed to draw this - Yes I am. Free speech is protected by law in my country, Ireland (where google is registered for EU citizens), and the USA (where this platform is located).
4. You shouldn't draw Muhammad because it's offensive to some people - Well, then don't watch the video if you find it offensive. This video is educational for a non-Muslim audience. You cannot expect people to conform to your own religious beliefs, just as I won't demand you to conform to mine.
5. Any form of (death) threat - please email them to me directly. Add the subject line "death threat" so I can delete it immediately. ...please stop acting so childish... Most of us haven't made silly death threats since we were angsty teenagers.
6. Parts are inaccurate - There are various denominations of Islam, so I chose the middle ground on which most sources agree, favouring actual historical sources over mythological ones. So if you learned or heard something else then it might be because that particular denomination believes differently.
Ps, the best thing about the TH-cam banhammer is that you can "hide" someone. So any comment or reply they make will be hidden on all my videos. They will still see their own comments and replies, but nobody else will.
Of course, I don't use it often, but it's such a perfect option for the rude people.
Thank you for explaining all of this :) I was wondering what is going on, as I hadn't seen this before. Watching it now :D
Edit: I found the visual gag with the elephant absolutely hilarious. I liked the video, thank you for it :)
its sad that people have let terrorism dictate what they will draw. animation allows for an explanation and understanding of history, that reading and spoken word does not. this video is dope af.
@@HistoryScope so you want to Attack islam?
you know what you do is *Wrong* , you said:
"
Ps, the best thing about the TH-cam banhammer is that you can "hide" someone. So any comment or reply they make will be hidden on all my videos. They will still see their own comments and replies, but nobody else will.
Of course, I don't use it often, but it's such a perfect option for the rude people."
I went to a catholic high school and suprisingly the religion class actually had a chapter teaching about other religions and cults. And they were suprisingly neutral when discussing other religions
Common misconception about muslims is that they are to hate people who dont belive in islam thats actually wrong we are supposed to try to convert them to islam but if we cant convert them we can still be friends with them so we 'dont have a dont be friend with people who belive in other religion rule'
I think that’s the best think I got from my religious up bringing, not so much learning about That religion but understanding are away from politics and social issues
@Halim Yacob one other way to go to jannah is by being a mortyer basically getting killed in a war that has been started for the reasons that allah approves of to start a war.
@@real_Pinoy ok first thats rude to the religion and to its people second terrosim is not what we do the idiots like bin laden did the bad shit because they are say it with me "idiots that kill people "in the name of islam" while islam doesnt even approve of ittttt" kind of a mouthful isnt it?
Honestly as a muslim myself this video taught me things that i didn’t know, great job on the research and objectiveness, however one mistake you made is that muhammed (pbuh) never actually wrote the Quran himself because as you said he was illiterate, it was rather Abu Bakr Al Seddik who wrote down the Quran for the first time
Rached Ben nasr no to be more precise there was a number of companions who wrote the verses of Quran and during the time of Abu Bakr those writing were assembled into the book known as Quran.
I never knew about the author either, so thanks for that
@@mikado6407 He only did so as to not leave censored bars across the screen, i understand your religious vigor but disliking such a well made video is alot
The Wayfarer he is not the author but it is the word of god
Originally the Quran was meant to be orally passed down through generations but many Muslims were warriors and so many of them died in warfare that entire parts of the Quran were being lost so it became required to record it.
Looking forward to the open minded and constructive commentary down in the comments section
i'm up for some, how about you?
How's the art review going?
@Swapn Lok does the mind start at the neck?
* be open minded
* he had sex with a 9 year old girl
* he took his adopted sons wife and made adoption haram
* countless killings in the name of a false god his ancestors worshipped
* he thought the trinity consisted of the Father, the Son and the Mother, somehow all-knowing Allah didn't know about the Holy Spirit
* smh islamophobic
None of your replies trigger me. You must assume I am Muslim based off of my name. I left Islam and am no longer a follower. However it wasn't silly edgy commentary that you continue here that pushed me to do so.
I'm actually pretty impressed by the level of civility in the comments. There's more vitriol in the average K-Pop video comments section.
Belligerent people have no curiosity. And this is the sort of video you only watch (as a non Muslim person with no stake in the religion) if you are a curious person.
It is also because he tried to be fair and accurate, he has no agenda
Be as curious as you like, but once you put 1 and 1 together you can not unsee. Read the qu'ran and prove your curiosity. Muhammad's acts were just as wrong as any other barbarism at the time. Being stuck in a mindset, a religion stuck in these times, objectively proves that something is wrong with you. Either brainwashed, stupid or evil. It's the antithesis to atheism, which people only "convert" to by their own volition and rationale.
Deal with the truth.
Kenji Wright i disagree
@@googleuser9383 One thing I came away from this video with, are some of the various strategies that were employed in battle and diplomacy in the story. Sure, you might call that "barbarism", but it's something you can apply very easily to things in your life such as dealing with adversarial colleagues at work. I'm saying this as an atheist myself. There's a reason these stories have a mass appeal. You need to be able to extract these core aspects of different religions in order to understand how the people around you work. You can learn a lot about your neighbor living in a christian suburb in Georgia by reading an ancient Chinese text.
The idea that the wealthy Meccans were afraid Islam would detract from pilgrimages to Mecca is awefuly ironic.
I’m a Christian, and I believe Muhammad existed. While I don’t agree with his interpretation of God’s will and the history of Judaism and Christianity, or the religious laws he established, I can appreciate his attempt to bring people back into harmony with the God of Abraham.
Also, you forgot to mention the part of
Islamic history where their followers were early on violently persecuted in Mecca, and were forced to flee to Abyssinia (modern-day Ethiopia), where the Christian king welcomed the followers of this new religious sect and protected them from attempts by the pagan Meccans to extradite them.
By the way, this video made it through the manual review process of TH-cam and is actually monitized.
I'm probably as surprised about that as you are. So good job TH-cam for realising the educational intent of this video!
go get that bag
Im sure you will make a lot of prophet from it=0>
@@billyb6001 That joke is terrible. I love it.
@Abdul Shah do you think the joke islam(e)
Surprised? Why? You didn't bad mouth Jews, and that is the key
"Are you going to draw Muhammad?"
"Yes"
@Jack Blade Out of curiosity - not insult - what denomination teaches that/where did you hear it? Avery could very well be wrong in saying 3, being a non-Muslim himself, but I want to research it myself
@@zozzy4630 I'm sunni, it's prohibited to draw pictures of the prophet (PBUH)
@@vexxcon8125 Thanks but I was asking the person who replied "Muslims can take 4 wives not 3 you dolt" because I want to know 1 who he was insulting anyway and 2 where he got that number from
Why would you do something so controversial yet so brave
Marc Carran there is no god.
Been a member of this channel for awhile now. Have been to the Middle East and fought in many wars. I think you portrayed it fair and even, identifying things that are misconceptions and truths.
If the Qu'ran says it is the true word of god - as it is written - and it punishes everyone who denies it with death, how is modern/moderate islam not wrong by definition? Their own holy book says they're atheist.
Muhammad is just like Karl Marx. Even IF he meant well, he put the world through a lot of suffering.
@@googleuser9383 yez
@@googleuser9383 The Fuck are you saying??
This is such a controversial subject I congratulate anyone that has the nerve to gives it a go. I would never even attempt it myself as my knowledge of Mohamed is little but your portrayal of the man in my oppinion makes his teachings more approachable. Keep up the good work, thanks.
I'm a Muslim and I agrer
Did he include the fact that Muhammad didn't write down the qur'an but was assembled after his death and was preserved through memorization and word-of-mouth
Yes 27:40
sounds like a popular formula, or were the other holy books written on the spot on laptops?
@ It wasn't compiled until after he was dead
@ Except that a goat ate a couple of sections from it. wasn't complete until he was dead
@ I trust the mother of your faith on the subject more than you.
I love your channel. It's one of the only ones I have found that don't display a heavy bias. You're quickly growing to one of my favorite history channels. Keep it up!
7:24 Islamically god is not a man in the sky
The Quran and all the Islamic books didn't proclaimed God as a man nor female but the discribed God as a *HE/HIM*
What I'm trying to say is they there was no description of God as a man with genitalia they just implied that God is a male
@@apooto1553 this is actually due to the language of Arabia, not much to do about gender.
@TH-cam Funny yeah they said that but they didn't but they did not say that it isn't it or an unknown entity they specifically said as "him"
@@apooto1553 In Arabic, when you're referring to a situation, a phenomenon or something with an anonymous gender, it's usually the male pronouns that are used. So basically in English, one would say "one is, one might etc." in Arabic, that "one" is described as male. It's just a language thing.
@Ai Bek yeah exactly that’s why I I said it’s a language thing
Respect for History Scope, thanks for make this content available :)
It's educational purposes guys, so please understand :D
damn u here
Lah, IH kesini juga?
Main nya jauh euy 👍
You drew Muhammad? Watch the comment section explode
Well, this isn’t a detailed drawing of Muhammad. So I think it’s probably alright.
Honestly, if I would complain about a drawing it’s probably the drawing of god.
Though, I wouldn’t come and insult anyone. I’d just suggest to change it to light instead of an old man with wings and abs.
Parkour_TNT to be honest the drawing of God was utterly fantastic
Most Muslims seems to be fine with it. You know why? Because the intent was not to deliberately be insulting or degrading but instead to have a productive discussion about and exploration of a delicate subject. These things matter and make a huge difference...
Actually no. Lots of Muslims have already sent waves of insults and threats. TH-cam or myself simply remove those comments so you guys don't have too see them.
@@HistoryScope well, okay, maybe half of the Muslims out there might raise an eyebrow or an objection at the portrayal on second thought. I personally did not think you were trying to be malicious. It is just one of those topics where you're going to get a ton of insults and threats regardless of what you say
Good video. There are several inaccuracies however that i will list for you.
The Tribe that Muhammad belonged to is Quraish (which effectively ruled Mecca) but he is a member of the Banu Hashim clan. Tribe-->Clan-->Family
A Muslim man is allowed to marry up to 4 wives not 3. Also Kahdeeja was 15 years older than Muhammad, not 20.
On a side note, It is true that Aisha's marriage was considered controversial even back then but Aisha herself grew to be the most powerful and intelligent woman in Muslim history, many of the Hadiths Muslims follow are credited to her as she was the first who heard them and wrote them down. When others criticized Muhammad for marrying her young she would scold them and take pride of the fact rather than shame.
Now my biggest issue with this video is not these mistakes, nor that you chose to portray prophets and God. My biggest issue the subject you brought up about the existence of Muhammad himself. This is a very weird thing to even mention since your only argument is that there are no written records of him existing. You do realize that unlike Jesus, Muhammad lived in the backwater region of Arabia where there was no central government at all to make censors, like the Romans, nor where there many literate people to write those records. Arab tradition is entirely oral and only after Islam did they start a written tradition. If everyone in the Arabian peninsula at the time can attest to the existence of one man, albeit verbally, then there is no doubt that he did exist. Unless you are accusing thousands of people who lived at the time of being subject to a mass hallucination. There is also the fact that millions of people around the world are descended from him and Muhammad does have a family tree that links him to other people.
Other than the aforementioned, i agree with most of the info you provided in the video. I would grade it as a solid B.
Mohammad the pedophile?
Best comment on TH-cam
Even if he was alive the fact that he groomed a 9 year old, conditioning her Into believing it was ok makes it ok for you?... Disgusting
Probably the best comment on this vedio.
@@Subsidize101 2 things, first he married woman out of respect mostly over love second he didn't physically touch her till she was what was considered legal age bacl then oh and she was daughter of a king so that marriage helped spread islam
this is starting to feel like extra credits
High praise, thank you!
@@HistoryScope 0/10. Voice is not high pitched 🙄
I'm Irish?
@@HistoryScope if so, you have the strangest Irish accent I've ever heard 😂
Your content is much better than extra credits.
I can't help but think there should be some kind of "middle ground" religion between Islam, Christian, and Judaism religions since they share a fair deal of common ground.
I'm a Muslim and I agree
Its was not 3 years of not hearing a revelation as it would not be possible in the given timeline of his live. Top islamic scholars agreed it may have been 3 months.
one important fact you need to correct, is that Muhammad didnt write anything himself and he hired scribes to write and compile the Quran. also the Quran came down at a long period of time and was shared by Muhammad to his Sahabah who memorized the verses word by word until it was written. also the acted as checks and balances for each other as the arabs at the time since they were mostly illiterate had an amazing memorizing skill to recite poems and stories.
but overall great video. you are an enlightened person to try and understand and learn about the whole world and from multi-lens approach.
I love the history of religions. The historical figures at the head of all religions are very difficult to research historically . Appreciate this.
Just one key fact for me... the entity in the cave never identified himself. Some one else, who was not present in the cave, told Muhammed who the entity was. So he assumed it from that point on.
Very informative and I learned a lot from this video about islam. Keep up the good work ❤️
Muslims brought so much knowledge to Europe and contributed much to Hispanic culture since many of the
Spanish immigrants to the New World (including my own) were Andalusian. Muslims are my brothers and I am greatly indebted to their influence on the combined Hispanic culture.
Southern Spain has always been a crossroad of culture. Before them the goths thre romans the carthaginians the Greeks. The phoenicians built many of the first cities like cadiz or Sevilla, or malaga Gibraltar or ibiza.
@@azrael7891 I am aware. ☺️ That's why I'm so glad that videos like this exist.
@@ACrownofFlowers I've been to Al andaluz. You can tell it's arab. Especially with the moorish ruins everywhere.
@@azrael7891 that's very cool. I've only seen the architecture and city in books.
@@ACrownofFlowers that's good. I was like you. Next time I go it'll be one way, hopefully we meet there one day.
just to clarify something about the taxes which a lot of people get wrong
christians and jews have to pay tax called jezia but muslims people have to pay "zakah" which is a percentage of their money given to help the poor and this zakah is only required from muslim
so the jezia is like the alternative for zakah
Was/is there a difference in amount payed?
Ah yes, the nearby city of city.
This is prettt good. I am a muslim,can you make the same video but with other religion? I want to learn the other religion too.
@Fruit Shake which evil are you talking about? Im open minded to talk about that.
@Fruit Shake Loooooool. The bible is not a magical book of truth. Sorry honey. Lots of its prophecies don't come true
Don't call the Christian god good when he was never against slavery and he thinks it's OK to burn people in hell for eternity. I'm not everlastingly good and I couldn't even do that - meaning Yahweh is evil.
@@DontKnow-lz1vh Calling for killing gays, not ending slavery, threatening people with hell should they refuse to convert, saying that the word of a woman is a third as important as that of a man and saying men can beat their wives. That's some of the evil in the Qur'an. BUUUUUT, that's not unique to the Qur'an.
All of that evil is more or less in the bible and torah too. All three of the religions are evil - Christianity, Islam and Judaism. It doesn't mean the practitioners are. Most Christians, Muslims and Jews never fully read their holy books so they don't act out or even know of the evil parts so that's good at least.
@@caimaccoinnich9594 sooo... does that mean you don't believe in any religion?
@Theboy82 no that wpuld be your whole family
Some of point in this video a high condensed, minimize and sometimes wrong.
1. You drawn Abu Bakar and Ali feuding with each (at some point in the video) other is will fully wrong. In actual fact Ali and Abu Bakar never feud with each other their follower did. When Abu Bakar ascended as the leader for Islam, he himself visited Ali and asked to not to have any bad blood between them. Ali with all his greatest does not harbour judgement toward him.
2. 27:33 Yeah Muhammad never able to participated in the Muslim conquest because he is dead. Those conquest are mainly been done by his successor or the Rashidun Caliphate. That's why there's never a source mentioned him during the conquest because he is already dead. Muhammad only manage to unite all the tribe and Arabia that's all.
3. 27:43 Saying that Islamic sources can't be trusted so Muhammad does not exist is ignorant. In this case Sun Zhu does not exist because it a Chinese sources. There's not other sources saying that he exist he might be a myth. See what I'm saying. Yes a lot of the Islamic sources might be highly exaggerated, but to disqualify all of the sources is dumb.
See the pinned comment.
@@HistoryScope Actualy, i can't find the pinned comment. It's not the first comment as far as i can see...
8:44 it’s was written down mainly by his family and his cousin Ali, the prophet was illeterate.
Very informative and factual video. Simple language and excellent presentation. Narration superb🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
An interesting and much more balanced video than I expected.... I will watch more....
Im agnostic but was raised muslim this video is accurate well constructed and bold i like it
As a Muslim myself, I must say you did a pretty good job putting this all together in 30 minutes. I find some of what you said inaccurate, but then again that is only natural as there is a lot out there about Muhammad and much dispute exists surrounding certain stories. I would like to ask, after making this video what is your view of Muhammad? Do you view him as a genuinely good man as Muslims do or do you view him more as a power hungry pervert charlatan as he is often portrayed in the West?
Your videos are crazy good
Please ignore any comment on pictures. You tried your best to portray what you could. You tried your best. You missed something but you you got many things spot on. The point is you did your best. Cheers! Your muslim sub from Pakistan.
Definitely not gonna be contraversial.
Welp better watch this before the controversy comes
The controversy will be removed as soon as it comes :)
History Scope why cant you let people argue for once?
Letting people argue is perfectly fine. I let people do it all the time... I won't tolerate people insulting each other or something like that.
@@LyyraRoi insulting=/=arguing and shouldn't be considerated free speech.
@Jyxoty i am not a muslim i am an orthodox.
Interesting story. Thanks for the video!
You missed a little simple point towards the end
Muhammad's grave is in Medina
which you can visit and the check it for yourself
@INERT
You're probably gonna get arrested by local authority for disrespecting a National Treasure but you do you buddy
commanderAce1 Really? I thought it was only for muslims?
@INERT have a good time in hell
@INERT wow you are so funny. i am literally laughing so hard. not.
@@comradelayla5635 lol he deleted his commeent p.s nice reply my friend
I remember you doing this but I could never find these videos. I guess you deleted them at some point?
Nope, unlisted. Now it's back
@@HistoryScope yay
great video, although there are too many mistakes or misconceptions that even some muslims still believe in. but still you can never get the full true story
There are alot of things that some muslims will agree on and others disagree if something is a sin and you did it without knowing it is a sin you will not be held accountable
Even though that I consider myself as a conservative Muslim and yes I might disagree with you on some of the pictures or drawing used in this video. However, I admire your academic honesty and the pure intention behind creating such a video. I wish you the best of luck wherever you go my friends :) (subscribed already !)
Islam prohibits muslims from drawing living beings their is no rule on drawing the prophet for non muslim especially the way he drew the prophet it was not in a tone of mockery.
As a Muslim, I appreciate the historical unbiased view of a non-Muslim towards the Muslim faith. Some misconceptions do exist in this video but they outweigh most of the truths.
Thank you for making this video for educational purposes so others have a better understanding of where we come from.
This video really doesn't bode well for your religion.
Maybe one day you'll realize what I meant.
@@googleuser9383 Could you elaborate please?
@Joshua Davis 😮😮😮
@Joshua Davis Please stop spreading false rhetoric. None of what you say is true. You should be ashamed of yourself for hurting other people. You're not a good person. Learn some humanity.
@Joshua Davis You're cherry picking verses from the Quran and adding your own interpretation to it.
Bruh they taught us more about Muhammad here in America than about Buddah and I went to an area with barely that many Muslims.
The video got a lot of things right, however there was too many inaccuracies which makes this video less of an educational.
absolutly
Who cares, the quran is very good toilet paper now :)
8:49 mohammad did not write down
he literally cant read nor write
just memorised among people and recited every day like nowadays.true form is recitation written is for young ones benifit.
This sounds like one of my acid trips
Right??
Can you provide your sources for this video? I’m curious to see what else there was.
I thought this video was well thought out and informative. Thank you
I would.Thank you for your reply
I think the close captioning might be incorrect.
While this guy is painting Islam in nice colors every one should know that Turkey is reintroducing a bill whereby a person will be allowed to marry his victim irrespective of age. Other Arab states are are also expected to follow suit or have similar laws. This is debacle of humanity and we all should be held responsible for the young lives sacrificed to this madness.
The art looks like extra history lul
Very Informative video, I learn so much from your channel. Thank you!
Just started learning about Islam.. This video was a great start thanks for uploading. I learned alot. Mashallah
Are you Muslim.
@@fadibokino6764 not yet
@@missglasgow88 you don't know nothing about Islam
By the way not any arabin is Muslim
@@fadibokino6764 no shit sherlock I'm clearly here to learn.
@@missglasgow88 nah nah it's cool
But you should learn from many different resorses
It's cool a read many realigns
Are you from USA
I love how so many religions start with god or a messenger of god communicating his will to one illiterate dude who is completely alone.
Dozens of religions have started this way. And I'm sure more will come.
Like what?
lmao edgy athiest
Clown athiest. Foolish clown. there are problems with your argument. Firstly it is self defeating. Pretty much, if causality cannot exist without time then Big Bang should be rejected. Given that at the point of singularity there was no time, but boundary to time, and that boundary is obviously causally connected to the rest of the universe, then how can this causal relation make sense? If the objectors accept this point that the boundary is causally connected to the rest of the universe, they should also accept that the boundary is same a temporal causal relation when God decided to manifest His will and Power to create the universe. If you maintain that causality doesn't make sense outside of time, then you'll have to reject causal relation between boundary of the singularity to the rest of the universe, which is pretty much rejecting the bloody existence of the universe. Secondly it assumes there is a consensus on the notion of time in science. There are different notions of time in quantum mechanics and relativ
How could the Quran have existed before Muhammad had written it? You said at the siege of Medina the assaulting army had hurled "Quranic" phrases and insults at the defenders of the city, of which Muhammad controlled. Given he himself couldn't read, and based on the oppositions leaders feelings toward the prophet it seems unlikely they were converts to his new religion.
The quran was revealed over the course of 23 years and it was spread orally, the arabs had a tradition of poetry.
This is actually really interesting
And then what happens when the next person comes along and says .." you know what? I think God has just told me to write this down and here's the updated version " ...What then eh ?
That IS exactly what happened with the abrahamic religions 😂 so just look to the past for the answer to your question.
damn boi you usin logic and reason among the indoctrinated. You brave soul
Baha'i
That's basically what happened with Mormonism
Well even if you don't believe in Islam but just by going with Abrahamic religion concepts we know about many prophets like Adam, Noah, Lot, David, Abraham, Ishmael, Issac, Moses, Jesus and many others we already know about but then Muhammad at the end declared through Quran that He is the last of Prophets and there won't be any coming except the return of Jesus followed by the Anti Christ which will mark the beginning of doomsday.
In the farewell sermon Muhammed Peace be Upon him was quoting Allah/ God when he said "O humanity I have completed my favour upon you and chosen islam as Religion for you" it was not his words. He was just delivering the mesaage.
4:50
Mohammad did run home and was sick of what happen. but it wasn't his wife who told him that he is a prophet it was a Jewish doctor who told him by the meaning " you speak of what Joseph has brought to us "
See my pointed comment for my reply :)
@@HistoryScope all in all good work :)
I will write down the mistakes in this video in this dread while watchin it. Let me first start with the fact that Muhammad was illiterate as you mentioned during your story about the first encounter Muhammad had with the Arch Angel. But then around 8:45 you say that the Quran was 'written down literally, word for word, by Muhammad'. This was not correct.
Just a thought...you said you lived in Ireland. But your accent is anything but Irish. I think it sounds very Dutch. Your S's and your L's just give it away. Or am I terribely wrong?
Will you do one on Joseph Smith? Feel like people don't know much about him.
Bless you my Lord History Scop and your Universe and for teaching me about Muhammad
You're right, in the West we know more about Buddha than Muhammad. Thanks for making this video. I must say that I'm not impressed by his life though.
to be fair Buddha was an interesting lad, going around learning and experimenting
@Swapn Lok me ? so at least one
@INERT Jesus like little boy anus?
Regarding Prophet's marriage to Aysha(ra):
In the 'Age of Consent Act'(1891),the age of consent for girls was increased from 10 to 12 years old. In 1880, 37 states of America had an age of consent at 10 years old.
Roman law 100 B.C brides were 12 years old
.
•St Augustine from 10 years old 350 A.D
•King Richard second married 7 years old at 1396
•In 1791 Frances Napoleonic code set marriage of consent 11 years old
.
•1880 USA, Delaware minimum age to get marry was 7 years old and California age of 10 years
.
In the ancient time women had to marry early for two reasons:
1. There was too much wars and so they needed to reproduce faster as average life expectancy wasn't high .
2. They didn't have to go to schools, college or University like today that could spend their 16 years of life. So they were married off earlier. It was our human history throughout the world.
Even today the minimum age of marriage differs from place to place, Parental consent is needed in Alabama and Utah at age 14, while in Nebraska and Oregon, the age is 17. In New Hampshire, the ages at which you may get married with parental consent are 14 for males and 13 for females.
I think we all agree that 6 years old to marry and 9 year old to have sex is fundamentally wrong on so many levels. How could a prophet of God think it's ok to have sex with a child... Either God thinks it's ok or Muhammed wasn't a prophet!!!!
@@bigafrojames Read my full comment. It was our human history marrying early. In ancient time we didn't have school, college, Uni etc. to spend our early life. What we had is war. To win the war you gotta reproduce faster. The average life expectancy of a woman was around 40. That's why early marriage was very common. Moreover, this marriage was proposed by the father of Aysha, best friend of prophet [pbuh] himself. Her marriage was already engaged with her cousin(Cousin marriage was common even before 1800). If prophet didn't marry her, she would be married with her cousin anyway. It is worth mentioning that most of the wives of the prophet was 30+ years old. Man had more than one wives because woman usually didn't take part in war. So the number of woman was much higher.
Book of Jasher chapter: 24
40 And the young woman was of very comely appearance, she was a virgin, and *Rebecca was ten years old* in those days.
45 And *Isaac was forty years old* when he took Rebecca, the daughter of his uncle Bethuel, for a wife.
Some people may argue that as she was fetching water so she cannot be that young. You've to understand today's 10 years old and thousand years before 10 years old aren't the same. People used to mature faster physically. Moreover,Mary the mother of Jesus was 12-14 years old when she gave birth to Jesus (Source: Matthew:A Shorter Commentary by Dale C. Allison). Even among the popular historical figure -
33 year old King John of England married 12 years old Isabella. Margaret Beaufort gave birth to Henry Tudor at the age of 13 (1457).In the play of Romeo-Juliet,Juliet was 13. Joan of France, Duchess of Berry was betrothed at 8 days old and married at the age of 12.
1. Professor of history Margaret Wade Labarge
“It needs to be remembered that many Medieval widows were not old, Important heiresses were often married between the ages of 5 and 10 and might find themselves widowed while still in their teens.”
2. Professor Richard Wortley and Professor Stephen Smallbone, both of whom state that prior to the 1900s girls married very young,
“In Medieval and early modern European societies, the age of marriage remained low, with documented cases of brides as young as seven years, although marriages were typically not consummated until the girl reached puberty (Bullough 2004). Shakespeare’s Juliet was just 13, and there is no hint in the play that this was considered to be exceptional. The situation was similar on the other side of the Atlantic; Bullough reports the case in 1689 of a nine-year-old bride in Virginia. At the start of the nineteenth century in England, it was legal to have sex with a 10 year-old girl.”
3. In the book, ‘Sex and Society’,
“Until the late 20th century U.S. age of consent laws specifically names males as perpetrators and females as victims. Following English law, in which the age was set at 12 in 1275 and lowered to 10 in 1576, ages of consent in the American colonies were generally set at 10 or 12. The laws protected female virginity, which at the time was considered a valuable commodity until marriage. The theft of a girl’s chastity was seen as a property crime against her father and future husband. If two people were married and had sex, no matter what their age, no crime was committed because a woman was her husband’s property. In practice, too, the consent laws only protected white females, as many non-white females were enslaved or otherwise discriminated against by the legal system.”
4. Richard A. Posner is chief judge of the U.S court of appeals, Seventh Circuit Chicago. Katherine B. Silbaugh is associate Professor at Boston University School of Law, they say that before the 1900s age of consent was ten years old,
“The law governing the age of consent has changed dramatically in the United States during this century. Most states codified a statutory age of consent during the nineteenth century, and the usual age was ten years.”
5. The Scottish Law prior to 1900s by Sir John Comyns and Stewart Kyd,
“By the law of Scotland, a woman cannot contrabere sponsalia before her age of seven years. 1 Rol. 343. I. 20.
But by common law, persons may marry at any age. Co. Lit. 33. A.
And upon such marriage the wife shall be endowed, if the attain the age of nine years, of what whatsoever age her husband be; but not before the age of nine years. Co. L. 33. A.”
6. Professor of Sociology Anthony Joseph Paul Cortese says that a 50 year old man being with a girl under 10 (being intimate) Under United States law was legal until the mid 1960s,
“In 1962, the American Law Institute recommended that the legal age of consent to sex- that is, the age below which sex is defined as statutory rape- be dropped in every state to age 10 (Katchadourian and Lund 1972: 439). In fact, until the mid 1960's, the legal age of consent in Delaware was 7 (Kling, 1965: 216). So a 50 year old man could legally have sexual intercourse with a 7 year old boy or girl.”
Im a muslim and i absolutely give 0 shits about you drawing anybody. Ignoring the people who have a 7th century caveman islam mentality is the best way going around this. Have s great day love your videos
We Muslims are honored to our Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him Islam will remain despite Lanuf haters
Or even better: let people live their lives the way they want to live their lives. Instead of enforcing hetero normative relationships.
Most gay men are MUCH happier with another man. Most gay women are MUCH happier with another woman, etc.
As a Muslim, I feel okay regarding drawing the prophet, and the I believe this law meant to not create idols to worship because in Arabic idols and images could be referred in the same word.
On the other hand, I feel this video is not educational rather it is referring to one belief of what is the true story. Regarding to the sources, and I'm bragging, before the bloom of Islamic sciences there were not a thing called a source or a methodology of criticism and to be objective in the research. All of this came as result of an order made by God (which is Allah in Arabic, so no need to say Allah if you are talking in English) to wonder the creation of the human and sounding creatures, and criticize information until reaching clarity.
Regarding Man can beat women, this is so not true and it's punched by every law in every country, and the only mention of this is from AN ISLAMIC SOURCE that a guy approached the prophet to sattel a disagreement with his wife, and prophet mentioned several steps reach intervention of family members of each side, and if this did not work he till him to hit her with a small stick not bigger than a finger leaving no pain or a mark as a symbol of high level of disagreement of her act!
One more thing, the rights you've mentioned. Non Muslims we willing to pay a tax for defense, and this obligate that Muslims to die if this what it takes to defend those tax payers and citizens of the Islamic country or runs by an Islamic administration. Only terrorists and you agree that not believers in God are different than believers and they should be treated differently.
Just want to advise you to not create educational content using this mindset, and to study more about the topic before. What you've done is what causing fundamentalists to be more fundamental and this mean more extreme then more terror, and this applies not only with Islam, but with any belief or ideology
OKAY. UM. MEN CANNOT BEAT THEIR WIVES. AT ALL. PERIOD. They can *symbolically* hit their wives with a thing called a miswak (which is basically the same pain as hitting them with a handkerchief) and it *cannot* hurt. It is meant symbolically, and not to cause pain. And secondly, *we do not know the age of ‘Aisha.* The biography of her sister says that ‘Aisha was married at 19 to Muhammad (SAW) and not 6-7. She absolutely was not that young, but we can’t know her exact age. It was most likely that she was around 19.
This. There were mistakes in the video.
Don't think I missed that Yu-Gi-Oh drop at 13:00 man. That just destroyed my brain, you activated your TRAP card man!
lol magical hat that needs a spell caster to perform
Meditation ,Yoga, monotheism, spiritual life, Reincarnation according to work,all are from Hinduism,the most ancient religion in the world.
Five pillars of Islam
1 the two testimonies that Allah is the only god and Muhammad his prophet
2 keeping up the prayers
3 giving alms
4 fasting the month of Ramadan
5 making a pilgrimage once a lifetime if the person is Abel with money and health
Ok.. Now hear me out. Assassin's Creed: Mohammed. That is all.
million dollar idea!
Give that man creater award of the year lol
Yo, total war : rise of Islam would also be cool 👀
@@MoMoKKY with a sequel 4 years later, total war: The unstoppable tide of Islam
I mean would he be like a black void to not piss off the Middle East?
Wtf was that jumpcut 5:07
He probably said something shady then realized it's not worth it 😆😆
I fucked up the editing
@@HistoryScope Just a small error, the video was amazing in animation/drawing and very informational overall, learnt a lot from it. :)
there are some problems i have with the video but the drawing of Muhammed PBUH is not one of them lol.
good video nonetheless though some of the information in it is still debated among muslim scholars :D
Good work my friend, I believe many will research more and bring out the historical facts of the Islamic wars instead of the indoctrinative ones. I am a Muslim but open minded. I am not stupid but respect anyone who has the courage to search for knowledge and truth. I question the scriptures myself at least that is what the Quran says, 'question the scriptures'
Pretty sure in Christian Tradition. Michael is the Arch Angel. Gabriel is the messenger.
The Abrahamic religions are like the Star Wars trilogy
Episode one: Judaism
Episode two: Christianity
Episode three: Islam
@Sampiro Locke yes, episode 3 is quite controversial, some fans really dislike it, but the ewoks are cute.
@@everythingiseconomics9742 4th would be the Baha'i Faith. Basically an amalgamation of the three.
@Sampiro Locke bro if u cant even face facts about islam admitted by even priests in the west and ribais atleast dont lie.
Prophet Mohammed (Sallallahu alhe wasalam) was one of the most peaceful people, don't draw him as mean and angry. He used to very patient
As an open-minded person from the Muslim community, I approve of this video.
This video is full of mistakes.
Thank you for this. I have always wanted to learn more about Muhammad. Good dude...
I stopped watching when History Scope lied that the Prophet's Uncle did not love him and when he lied and said that the Prophet Muhammed wanted to commit suicide by throwing himself off the mountain. Please do proper research or don't speak.
I just came for the comment cuz I know it isnt allowed to make pictures of Muhammad 🤣
Absolutely chad drawing Muhammed
Muhammad did not fight only Mecca, but every tribes around him. He said that he lived from robbing caravans, and that his god commanded him to fight against believers of other faiths, mass executing them, while enslaving their women and children. He assassinated his criticizers around Medina for criticizing him, including a mother of five. He ordered apostates to be executed, he himself ordered cut of feet and hands and to make blind some apostases to leave them die. He was not just a pedophile, genocider and womaniser, but also a caravan-robber warlord, a terrorist, a slave trader and a rapist. Nice example...
the pagan symbol is actually the christian symbol of the holly trinity, a mix of celtics culture and christians believes
The only pagan symbols are the black sstone that is kissed, which Umar said he knows benefits no one. the trekking between safa and marwah hills where the two idol shrines were located and which even the early muslims were uncomfortable to do but allah made legal. Read your history. Islam is ancient pagan arabian worship except mohammed removed all the other gods from the ka'ba. Everything else is as practiced before
8:25
The Quran tells of 25 Messenger and many Prophets
Muhammad said when ask about how many he said " they are more than 300 messengers of god and 125000 prophets"
124000
it is very pretentious of someone starting a new faith to say their teachings are the more "accurate" portrayal of another faith.
And not asking"why?" when being told to pray 50 times a day...kind of would perhaps clear things up 🤔
Isnt that what every prophet did tho
@@freecitizen2760 he didnt "negotiate" he asked and begged his god to make it easier on his people
@@freecitizen2760 by your logic our prayer is also negotiating and shirk since we ask for healing from disease and success in work and life
Allah is merciful and kind to his creation and he gave Mohammed and the Muslims and humanity many favors one of which ease of rituals
@@deeperanalysis3719why dont you marry from your own people?
for confirmation :
1. the birth doesn't have anything special except the incident before the birth and the prophices around it
2. the common sense at that time is much much worse than today time and the video doesn't list them all (since it is not the topic)
3. the reason why there is no third party or other sources is because most of the men in that time have job that are military based job or skill based job only a little have a knowledge based job, most of sources will be adapted by the muslim because at the time only the muslim had interest in that, and since this is a normal occurence in that time people just saw it as another tribal war
Thank you for clarifying! I have a question: in reference to your 3rd point, during the Golden Age of Islam (approximately the years 700-1300), do you think Muslim historians might have destroyed third party sources in order to confirm their own beliefs, or do you think the problem is that there were few third party sources in the first place?
For me, having grown up in a European and Christian-based culture, I know that the Catholic church suppressed and quieted a lot of scientific and historical knowledge so they could protect their beliefs from being proved wrong, during the Middle Ages (almost exactly the same time as the Muslim Golden age!), but I've never been taught if Muslim scholars misrepresented their history in a similar way, or to a similar extent. I think all people can be stubborn sometimes, and ignore new information to hold onto old beliefs, but the destruction in the Middle Ages was rather systematic and political.
@@zozzy4630
1. there might or might not be. because the muslim historian has their own bias and circumstances at the time.
2. at the time muhammad doesn't really that famous only the mostly only arab know him until when he created the nation that people start to notice him and the europe start thinking he is a threat but at the time he did he already old and then passed away.
3. the arab world were still at comparable is look very alike europe dark age at the time and because the islamic golden age that jumpstart the era of the arab world to be comparable to the late middle ages of europe. most of history before the golden age of muslim are either gone, missing, get destroyed in war or maybe intentional erasing. just like dark age of europe
4. the muslim at this time doesn't really searching for the third party source since the quran mostly is their primary source for history of muhammad life and from other sources beside that only a small fraction are written mostly are hearsay passed down from previous generation (because at the time the arab have a really low literacy rate)
@@dutaasrorusiregar657 Thank you
@Phil Weatherley eh, I'm the one who asked and I still understood what he meant. English probably isn't his first language, and that's fine: I'd rather that response than if he just typed it in his native language and I had to rely on Google translate or something. And to be fair, I was asking for his opinion, not necessarily a well-researched response on behalf of any group's beliefs. It was enough for me to use as a stepping stone for more research, and that's all I needed, really. I can link some works if you're genuinely curious, though.
@Phil Weatherley
education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2133/Islam.html (History of Islamic education)
www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t243/e275 (History of the Qur'an, including its influence on early Muslim education and especially literacy)
www.islamicmanuscripts.info/reference/articles/Wasserstein-1990-Library-MME5.pdf (A historical work about the library of early Andalusian ruler al-Hakam II. Note that it was destroyed soon after al-Hakam II's death in a push towards greater orthodoxy in Islam, with scholars at the time viewing many of the philosophical and theological works in it to be heretical.)
And of course, a few Wiki lists of early historiographical works of the Muslim world and early Muslim historical scholars:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historiography_of_early_Islam
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_historians#The_historians_of_the_formative_period
You'll see in the first one, there are a few references to scholars stating that many historical accounts written by Muslim historians during the Islamic Golden Age are contradicted by contemporary outsider sources, at least when it comes to the inception of the religion around the 7th-8th centuries. If you take a closer look at some of those sources, they affirm that this is probably evidence of embellishment or misrepresentation on the part of those Golden-Age Islamic scholars; though of course, evidence shouldn't be confused for definitive proof. I wasn't able to find any specific references to any major systematic destruction of early historical works, but many Islamic libraries were destroyed either insularly (e.g., the library of Rayy, and the library of al-Hakam II, mentioned above) or by outsiders, especially during the Crusades (e.g., the library of Banu Ammar, Dar al-'ilm).
I love how you represented Allah.
correction Banu qurayza, a jewish tribe was bound by the constitution to help defend Medina against any enemy that attacks the city but they betrayed Muslims and shut themselves in their fort.
I never got no depiction of prophets or god for educational purposes , I was tought depiction of god or prophet is wrong because people will make idol of them
One of many errors;
No one has ever had a direct conversation or seen Allah,a part flm Musa A.S(moises) who was able to talk with him.
The prophets had jeebril (gabriel) as a messenge between them.
Didnt Muhammad go to Sidratul Muntaha
As far as i know, Muhammad speak to the god himself. The event called isra' mi'raj.
29:05 - what a nonsense. First - the key from Kaaba has been taken from Ibn Talha by force and returned after ayah has been revealed with command to return it to Uthman Ibn Talha who didn't expect it to happen.
The video has many errors:
I will mention a few of them, for example:
A man marries 4 women, not 3.
And that the Messenger, peace be upon him, wrote the Qur’an, this is wrong, as he does not know how to read or write.
The story that the Messenger Muhammad, peace be upon him, wanted to commit suicide. This is a piece of news without a reliable source, and this is not recognized in the hadiths because the hadiths are based on sources.
And that men beat their husbands, this is true, but this is when they disobey their husbands ... and the beating is not as you portrayed it in the video, and you can search on Google for the condition of beating their husbands in Islam, as it does not leave marks ... and the Messenger, peace be upon him, said to those who beat women that they are not the best of people There are hadiths that explain that he prefers not to be beaten ... The evidence for this is that Muhammad, peace be upon him, did not hit his wives ... And another evidence that you said yourself was that in his last sermon he recommended treating women with good.
And the last request, can you give me the source that says that Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq and Ali bin Abi Talib were at odds?
I don’t know .. some mistakes I feel you made for lack of careful research, but some mistakes like hitting women, I feel you put them on purpose.
See pinned comment for response. This has already been covered ffs
@@HistoryScope You said that you did this video and there may be errors because there are different sects and you chose the middle ... well can you name the sect that says that the maximum number of wives is 3?
@@HistoryScope Or the sect that says that Muhammad, peace be upon him, knows writing and wrote the Qur’an.
Yes. Don’t like the fact that Prophet Muhammad ( pbuh) has been depicted. There are also quite a few mistakes in this video. I wouldn’t call it a reliable source to learn from.
What are the mistakes?
In 24:34 you made a mistake :
Men are not allowed to beat their wifes in Islam and if the wife gets beaten she has the righ to go to the loyer and ask him to divorce her from her husband and here the loyer HAS to do it
Have you ever read the Quran ?
But why the god allah said that humans have to pray 5 times . I guess preying is not important . Most important is doing good things for all not humans but for everybody . Then god will be very happy. If someone doing bad for anyone god will be hurt .... Humanity is most important than any religion ...
many differences between your research and what we've been taught in the textbooks in our school life ...anyway, it is the same in terms of eventual results..!