متاسفانه ما مردم هزاره ۶۲ فیصد خودرا در جنگ عبدالرحمن از دست دادیم وگرنه امروز افغانستان در دست ما بود، ۱۳۰ سال قبل قبل از کشتن و کوج اجباری هزاره‌ها ۶۷ فیصد نفوذ افغانستان را هزاره ها تشکل میداد که بصورت پراکنده در تمام ولایات حضور داشت کاش میران هزاره دست به قیام نمیزد و ما بیش از نیم از مردم خودرا از دست نمیدادیم و اقوام دیگر جرعت نمی‌کرد که مارا مغول بنامد😢
بشین موش خور، کوشانیان فارسیوانان ایرانی های شرقی تاجیک‌ها هستند. این سلطان محمد و چنگیز و تیمور انگ اینها از پشت های کوه های آلتایی وارد این سرزمین ها شدند. اینها مردم پیش از غژدی نشین های موش خور های مغول زندگی می‌کردند شهر و بازار داشتند. شما موش خور های مغاره نیشن با ۸۵ درصد واژه منگولی در زبان تان یعنی منگولی دعوای مالیک میکنید. خوب وقتی فرهنگ زبانتان که موش خور یو مغولی باشد از شما چی توقع داشت؟؟؟
هزاره های غزنی اکثرا قبیله قرلوق هزاره هستند . قرلق در کل یک قومیت بزرگ در ایران و افغانستان و آسیای میانه هستند که در افغانستان یکی از اجزای تشکیل دهنده قوم بزرگ هزاره هستند .
عدم وجود نام کنونی "هزاره" در متون تاریخی اولیه، دلیلی بر عدم وجود قوم هزاره نیست. هویت قومی یک پدیده پویا و در حال تغییر است و نامگذاری قوم‌ها نیز در طول تاریخ دچار تحولات بسیاری شده است. انتقاداتی که بر اساس عدم وجود نام کنونی در متون تاریخی اولیه مطرح می‌شود، نشان‌دهنده عدم درک کافی از پیچیدگی‌های تاریخی و تحولات هویتی است. مغرضین و دشمنان هزاره چون شما بدون آگاهی از تاریخ وهویت قومی تلاش برای تخریب هزاره ها دارید. که خیال خام است.
Mongolians are different from Turk,at the time of Gaznevid the Hazara were busy in Mongolia please don't stick on turk,one stick on Persian,one day on tajiks,now on Turkish identity, what can we do your are the Mongolians orphan.
The assertion that Hazaras are solely descendants of Mongols is ahistorical and misleading. This claim not only disregards the rich and complex history of the Hazara people but also perpetuates harmful stereotypes. The Hazara people are a distinct ethnic group with a deep-rooted history in the region. Archaeological evidence, such as the Bamiyan Buddhas, attests to the existence of a thriving civilization in the Hazarajat long before the Mongol invasions. The Mongol conquests undoubtedly had a significant impact on the region, including the Hazarajat, but to reduce the Hazara identity solely to a Mongol origin is a gross oversimplification and a historical inaccuracy. It is important to acknowledge that the Hazara people have been subjected to various forms of discrimination and prejudice throughout history. Such unfounded claims about their origins only serve to perpetuate these harmful stereotypes and contribute to the marginalization of the Hazara community. To understand the true identity of the Hazara people, it is essential to engage with scholarly research and historical records. By doing so, one can appreciate the diversity and complexity of the Hazara heritage, which is a product of centuries of cultural exchange and interaction with neighboring peoples.
@ourhazara please give me one official source that mentions about Hazara before Mongol, where is your archiological background, please read the history of Hazara by a Hazara intellectual Doctor Mosevy that he published in schematic diagram that are mentioned the whole Hazara branches in tree diagram and that person also mentioned the sources where he collected the information, you can't claim wrongly like Pashtun Pota khazana, the historian don't care about any ethical back ground in the region, they studied scientifically like checking the DNA and comparing the evidence both historical and archiological please don't make fault aligation on history,we should respect the work of those devoted their time to give us a picture of the past.
@@mikebob5528 The Mongols invaded modern-day Iran and Afghanistan, which is a historical fact. It is undeniable that the Hazara people have a significant physical resemblance to the Mongols, but this alone does not provide convincing evidence for their Mongol ancestry. It is not only the Hazaras who share physical traits with the Mongols; Uzbeks, Turkmens, and Kyrgyz people also exhibit similar features. No primary source has been found that confirms that Genghis Khan or his commanders instructed their soldiers to settle in regions known as Hazara Jat today. Although the Mongol influence on the formation of the Hazara people cannot be denied, it is also inaccurate to consider them the direct ancestors of the present-day Hazaras. One thing that has been clear throughout history is that no one has yet seen a Mongol-speaking Hazara. The theory of ethnic mixing of the Hazaras also has significant flaws. This theory does not address the ancient inhabitants of Hazara Jat. All these theories are weak. A more accurate understanding of the origins of the Hazara people can only be achieved by focusing on the ancient inhabitants of Hazara Jat. Before the invasion of Genghis Khan, these regions were not empty. Historically, Buddhism had been widespread in the southern Hindu Kush at least 1500 years before the Mongol invasion of Khorasan, so much so that the religion attracted thousands of Chinese pilgrims to Bamiyan. Bamiyan, located in modern Afghanistan, is the center of the current Hazara Jat. This area for centuries was a permanent settlement for the spread of the Mongoloid race. During the first century CE, Bamiyan was one of the best centers for the spread of Buddhism. At that time, Bamiyan was part of the Kushan Empire, influenced by Buddhist culture and religion. The Kushans were generally from the Saka tribes and inhabited the region extending from Kashgar to the north of the Balkh Sea. The easternmost of the Saka tribes were the Yuchi. The Kushans arose from the Yuchi and were driven south of the Amu Darya by war, settling in what is now northern Afghanistan. While the Kushan Empire collapsed in 220 CE in the northern Hindu Kush, it continued to rule the southern Hindu Kush until 425 CE. Buddhism was introduced to the southern Hindu Kush as early as the 3rd century BCE by Buddhist monks. Based on ancient coins found in Bamiyan, paintings on temple walls, and the surrounding Buddha statues, it can be concluded that the inhabitants of this region, about 2300 years ago, had the same physical facial features as the current Hazaras. Thus, the Mongoloid faces of the inhabitants of Hazara Afghanistan must be traced long before the invasion of Genghis Khan and Timur. The Yafetli and successors of the Kushan Empire also belonged to the Saka tribes, with similar physical features. The influence of the Yafetli people can be traced until the emergence of Turkish words in Hazaragi. Georgia (referred to as "Gharjistan" in Persian) has been the homeland of the Hazara rulers. The word "Ghar" in Pahlavi means "mountain," and we know that Hazara Jat is the most mountainous region of Afghanistan. The Hazaras are heirs of the Ghaznavid Empire, founded by Sebuktigin, one of the Hazaras of the Qarluq tribe. The Seljuks, Ghurians, and Khwarazm Shahs also ruled over Georgia, and the Turkish language was widely spoken in Georgia. Therefore, it is evident that long before the Mongol invasion, the inhabitants of present-day Hazara Jat were influenced by older Turkic-speaking tribes with Mongoloid features. The Mongol impact on the Hazaras is undeniable, given the repeated invasions of Mongol soldiers into the region and their subsequent settlement among the people of Central Asia. These soldiers initially spoke only Mongol, and their language influenced the Hazara people. Today, more than ten commonly used terms among the Hazara people are Mongol in origin. The influence of the Tajiks on the Hazaras is also indisputable, as they are considered the oldest inhabitants of Afghanistan and spoke Persian. In Ghazni, Bamiyan, Panjshir, Tajiks, and Hazaras have lived alongside each other for centuries. First, the Hazaras are among the oldest inhabitants of the region. Second, they are a mixture of various ethnicities and groups, with Mongol and Timur's armies being just a small part of them. Third, the early ancestors of the Hazaras were inhabitants of Central and Eastern Asia, who migrated from the north and south of the Hindu Kush and the areas of present-day Hazara Jat over 2300 years ago. Similarly, Buddhist monks who brought Buddhism were likely from Nepal, Tibet, and China. The Turkish language, with its many dialects and accents, was widely spoken in Bamiyan long before the Common Era. Hazara Jat, in ancient times, was known by various names, the first being Barbarestan, followed by Gharjistan. In the development of the Hazara community, three significant historical periods can be identified: first, the Barbari period, from 300 BCE to 724 CE; second, the Khorasan period, from 724 CE to 1890 CE; and third, the modern period, from 1890 CE onwards. The regions known today as Hazara Jat were largely part of the ancient Barbari or Gharjistan. The indigenous status of the Hazaras has been affirmed by the French researcher Frier, the famous Afghan historian Abdulhai Habibi, and all contemporary historians. It is better to refer to these sources rather than a few books from the reign of Abdul Rahman.
@@ourhazara why you running away from the reality, All your comments based on your feelings not academic information, there is not any single source before mongol to support the existing of Hazara in the region, all your Hypocritical information just far from the reality, good luck.
![تاریخ سامانیان [سامانیان عصر طلایی ایران بعد از اسلام]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ld4H_3iIZR8/mqdefault.jpg)
بسیار عالی جهان سپاس
من خودم هزاره از منطقه قرلوق هستم هزاره هستم❤❤❤افتخار می‌کنم
در پناه خدا باشید تاج سرما هستید ❤
بسیار عالی موفق باشی برادر
کاملا دقیق گفته اید یک واقعیت انکار ناپذیر میباشند
متاسفانه ما مردم هزاره ۶۲ فیصد خودرا در جنگ عبدالرحمن از دست دادیم وگرنه امروز افغانستان در دست ما بود، ۱۳۰ سال قبل قبل از کشتن و کوج اجباری هزاره‌ها ۶۷ فیصد نفوذ افغانستان را هزاره ها تشکل میداد که بصورت پراکنده در تمام ولایات حضور داشت کاش میران هزاره دست به قیام نمیزد و ما بیش از نیم از مردم خودرا از دست نمیدادیم و اقوام دیگر جرعت نمی‌کرد که مارا مغول بنامد😢
بله متأسفانه ۱۵۰سال است که پشتونها بازيچه دست انگليس هستند
تشکر از معلومات زیبایی تان ❤
بسیار عالی موفق باشید ❤
Khdawand shuma ra Nigah kana eqas da Barai Hazara Tahqiq mekonin❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤🙏🏼🙏🏼
بسیار دقیق و عالی قلبیه قرلق باید دقیق پیشینه تاریخی شان را دانسته و خود را جدا از هزاره نداند، با همبستگی و همدلی یک هزارستان واحد بسازیم. ❤❤❤
زرت😂
منم یکی از ترکان قارلوق هستم قارلوق قارلوغ این هردو کلمه درست هست دیگر هایش معنی نمیته
هزاره قرلق در پاکستان زیاد است 10ملیون
از هزاره های کوشانیان و غوریان بزار
بشین موش خور، کوشانیان فارسیوانان ایرانی های شرقی تاجیک‌ها هستند. این سلطان محمد و چنگیز و تیمور انگ اینها از پشت های کوه های آلتایی وارد این سرزمین ها شدند. اینها مردم پیش از غژدی نشین های موش خور های مغول زندگی می‌کردند شهر و بازار داشتند. شما موش خور های مغاره نیشن با ۸۵ درصد واژه منگولی در زبان تان یعنی منگولی دعوای مالیک میکنید. خوب وقتی فرهنگ زبانتان که موش خور یو مغولی باشد از شما چی توقع داشت؟؟؟
❤❤❤❤❤
هزاره های غزنی اکثرا قبیله قرلوق هزاره هستند . قرلق در کل یک قومیت بزرگ در ایران و افغانستان و آسیای میانه هستند که در افغانستان یکی از اجزای تشکیل دهنده قوم بزرگ هزاره هستند .
قارلوخ و قرخلو و قارلق یعنی عدد چهل در تورکی اقوامی از افشار مثل نادر شاه نیز از قرخلو یا قارلوقهایه غرب آسیا به خراسان برگشتن
@@hoseinkhakkhasteh
قرلق معنی درست آن برف، یخ و سرزمین سرد است
قرلوق ها قبل از میلاد هم در ولایت های شمال افغانستان بودن کتاب تاریخ گوکترکان را مطالعه کردیم با ترکان قرلوق جنگیدن
احیای زبان ارزشمند تورکی از وظایف واجب هر ملت تورک می باشد.
شما هزاره ها عقل و منطق را بکلی از دست داده اید،در زمان غزنویان کلمه بنام هزارهداصلآ وجود نداشت۔
عدم وجود نام کنونی "هزاره" در متون تاریخی اولیه، دلیلی بر عدم وجود قوم هزاره نیست. هویت قومی یک پدیده پویا و در حال تغییر است و نامگذاری قوم‌ها نیز در طول تاریخ دچار تحولات بسیاری شده است. انتقاداتی که بر اساس عدم وجود نام کنونی در متون تاریخی اولیه مطرح می‌شود، نشان‌دهنده عدم درک کافی از پیچیدگی‌های تاریخی و تحولات هویتی است.
مغرضین و دشمنان هزاره چون شما بدون آگاهی از تاریخ وهویت قومی تلاش برای تخریب هزاره ها دارید. که خیال خام است.
سلام برادر اگر می تواند از غزنی هزاره های معمد خوجه ویدیع وتعریف من خودم از هزاره غزنی قرباغ معمد خوجه استم. ازقرباغ تا ناهوری غزنی معمد خوجه است.
امید که این شپاولگر ودذد هزاره
نباشد.
هزارهای قدوق
@@a.k8096
من در آوردی
سلام دورد به شما هزاره ها همان سلسله غوریانی بزرگ است
Mongolians are different from Turk,at the time of Gaznevid the Hazara were busy in Mongolia please don't stick on turk,one stick on Persian,one day on tajiks,now on Turkish identity, what can we do your are the Mongolians orphan.
The assertion that Hazaras are solely descendants of Mongols is ahistorical and misleading. This claim not only disregards the rich and complex history of the Hazara people but also perpetuates harmful stereotypes.
The Hazara people are a distinct ethnic group with a deep-rooted history in the region. Archaeological evidence, such as the Bamiyan Buddhas, attests to the existence of a thriving civilization in the Hazarajat long before the Mongol invasions. The Mongol conquests undoubtedly had a significant impact on the region, including the Hazarajat, but to reduce the Hazara identity solely to a Mongol origin is a gross oversimplification and a historical inaccuracy.
It is important to acknowledge that the Hazara people have been subjected to various forms of discrimination and prejudice throughout history. Such unfounded claims about their origins only serve to perpetuate these harmful stereotypes and contribute to the marginalization of the Hazara community.
To understand the true identity of the Hazara people, it is essential to engage with scholarly research and historical records. By doing so, one can appreciate the diversity and complexity of the Hazara heritage, which is a product of centuries of cultural exchange and interaction with neighboring peoples.
@ourhazara please give me one official source that mentions about Hazara before Mongol, where is your archiological background, please read the history of Hazara by a Hazara intellectual Doctor Mosevy that he published in schematic diagram that are mentioned the whole Hazara branches in tree diagram and that person also mentioned the sources where he collected the information, you can't claim wrongly like Pashtun Pota khazana, the historian don't care about any ethical back ground in the region, they studied scientifically like checking the DNA and comparing the evidence both historical and archiological please don't make fault aligation on history,we should respect the work of those devoted their time to give us a picture of the past.
@@mikebob5528
The Mongols invaded modern-day Iran and Afghanistan, which is a historical fact. It is undeniable that the Hazara people have a significant physical resemblance to the Mongols, but this alone does not provide convincing evidence for their Mongol ancestry. It is not only the Hazaras who share physical traits with the Mongols; Uzbeks, Turkmens, and Kyrgyz people also exhibit similar features. No primary source has been found that confirms that Genghis Khan or his commanders instructed their soldiers to settle in regions known as Hazara Jat today. Although the Mongol influence on the formation of the Hazara people cannot be denied, it is also inaccurate to consider them the direct ancestors of the present-day Hazaras. One thing that has been clear throughout history is that no one has yet seen a Mongol-speaking Hazara.
The theory of ethnic mixing of the Hazaras also has significant flaws. This theory does not address the ancient inhabitants of Hazara Jat. All these theories are weak. A more accurate understanding of the origins of the Hazara people can only be achieved by focusing on the ancient inhabitants of Hazara Jat. Before the invasion of Genghis Khan, these regions were not empty. Historically, Buddhism had been widespread in the southern Hindu Kush at least 1500 years before the Mongol invasion of Khorasan, so much so that the religion attracted thousands of Chinese pilgrims to Bamiyan. Bamiyan, located in modern Afghanistan, is the center of the current Hazara Jat. This area for centuries was a permanent settlement for the spread of the Mongoloid race. During the first century CE, Bamiyan was one of the best centers for the spread of Buddhism. At that time, Bamiyan was part of the Kushan Empire, influenced by Buddhist culture and religion. The Kushans were generally from the Saka tribes and inhabited the region extending from Kashgar to the north of the Balkh Sea. The easternmost of the Saka tribes were the Yuchi. The Kushans arose from the Yuchi and were driven south of the Amu Darya by war, settling in what is now northern Afghanistan. While the Kushan Empire collapsed in 220 CE in the northern Hindu Kush, it continued to rule the southern Hindu Kush until 425 CE.
Buddhism was introduced to the southern Hindu Kush as early as the 3rd century BCE by Buddhist monks. Based on ancient coins found in Bamiyan, paintings on temple walls, and the surrounding Buddha statues, it can be concluded that the inhabitants of this region, about 2300 years ago, had the same physical facial features as the current Hazaras. Thus, the Mongoloid faces of the inhabitants of Hazara Afghanistan must be traced long before the invasion of Genghis Khan and Timur. The Yafetli and successors of the Kushan Empire also belonged to the Saka tribes, with similar physical features. The influence of the Yafetli people can be traced until the emergence of Turkish words in Hazaragi.
Georgia (referred to as "Gharjistan" in Persian) has been the homeland of the Hazara rulers. The word "Ghar" in Pahlavi means "mountain," and we know that Hazara Jat is the most mountainous region of Afghanistan. The Hazaras are heirs of the Ghaznavid Empire, founded by Sebuktigin, one of the Hazaras of the Qarluq tribe. The Seljuks, Ghurians, and Khwarazm Shahs also ruled over Georgia, and the Turkish language was widely spoken in Georgia.
Therefore, it is evident that long before the Mongol invasion, the inhabitants of present-day Hazara Jat were influenced by older Turkic-speaking tribes with Mongoloid features. The Mongol impact on the Hazaras is undeniable, given the repeated invasions of Mongol soldiers into the region and their subsequent settlement among the people of Central Asia. These soldiers initially spoke only Mongol, and their language influenced the Hazara people. Today, more than ten commonly used terms among the Hazara people are Mongol in origin. The influence of the Tajiks on the Hazaras is also indisputable, as they are considered the oldest inhabitants of Afghanistan and spoke Persian. In Ghazni, Bamiyan, Panjshir, Tajiks, and Hazaras have lived alongside each other for centuries.
First, the Hazaras are among the oldest inhabitants of the region. Second, they are a mixture of various ethnicities and groups, with Mongol and Timur's armies being just a small part of them. Third, the early ancestors of the Hazaras were inhabitants of Central and Eastern Asia, who migrated from the north and south of the Hindu Kush and the areas of present-day Hazara Jat over 2300 years ago. Similarly, Buddhist monks who brought Buddhism were likely from Nepal, Tibet, and China. The Turkish language, with its many dialects and accents, was widely spoken in Bamiyan long before the Common Era. Hazara Jat, in ancient times, was known by various names, the first being Barbarestan, followed by Gharjistan.
In the development of the Hazara community, three significant historical periods can be identified: first, the Barbari period, from 300 BCE to 724 CE; second, the Khorasan period, from 724 CE to 1890 CE; and third, the modern period, from 1890 CE onwards. The regions known today as Hazara Jat were largely part of the ancient Barbari or Gharjistan.
The indigenous status of the Hazaras has been affirmed by the French researcher Frier, the famous Afghan historian Abdulhai Habibi, and all contemporary historians. It is better to refer to these sources rather than a few books from the reign of Abdul Rahman.
@@ourhazara why you running away from the reality, All your comments based on your feelings not academic information, there is not any single source before mongol to support the existing of Hazara in the region, all your Hypocritical information just far from the reality, good luck.
@@mikebob5528 To cast pearls before swine.
مه هزاره هستم قرلوق کوسی شیر است
تو اگر هزاره بودی از تاریخ ات آگاهی میداشتی
چه فایده ازین یاوه گویی های پوچ که کی کوسلوق است و کی نیست؟
@Hghghghghghgn3u
آدم شو یابو
@ توخو یابو کوسلوق هستی. امکان اصلاح شدن تو گوخور هیچ امکان ندارد.
❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤