Top 10 Biggest Missiles in the World (Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Size 2019)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
  • Check Out our other military videos in the link below:
    • Top 10 Largest Destroy...
    The top 10 Biggest Missiles in the world will include only the ones that are active, operational or under development. These are mostly intercontinental ballistic missiles that have a very long range of the target. To date, the R-36M (SS-18 Satan) is the world's longest-range ICBM with a range of 16,000km. With a weight of 8.8t, the R-36M is also one of the heaviest ICBM in the world.
    The Buzz does not own the rights to these pictures or video clips. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images/clips to be credited or removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
    #ICBM #Missile

ความคิดเห็น • 634

  • @mariomatei2390
    @mariomatei2390 4 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    80%Missiles Rusia!!

    • @qoralinks9386
      @qoralinks9386 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      first see this th-cam.com/video/8M3mVkKJslU/w-d-xo.html

    • @bleachigo783
      @bleachigo783 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @THE FRENCH BAGUETTE ayaaaaaaaa 😵

  • @СергейСонин-д1б
    @СергейСонин-д1б 4 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    RS-28 Sarmat is not a ballistic, but a orbital rocket, it goes into space and there it waits for a command to the target

    • @suntorivanovich2421
      @suntorivanovich2421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      I think it depends on the specific flight program. It can fly on both ballistic and orbital trajectories.

    • @СергейСонин-д1б
      @СергейСонин-д1б 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      @@suntorivanovich2421 Of course, it can be ballistic, but for RS-28 such an indicator as the flight range does not exist. It can fly around the planet a couple of times and release gliders at the command of a person or the Perimeter system (Dead Hand).

    • @suntorivanovich2421
      @suntorivanovich2421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@СергейСонин-д1б I think such a flight mode violates the Outer Space Treaty. And the RS-28 will remain ballistic in terms of international agreements.

    • @СергейСонин-д1б
      @СергейСонин-д1б 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      @@suntorivanovich2421 maybe ... But who today complies with international treaties? United States?

    • @suntorivanovich2421
      @suntorivanovich2421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@СергейСонин-д1б Russia.

  • @kyawhtwe840
    @kyawhtwe840 4 ปีที่แล้ว +273

    Russia like ICBM👍

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Of course. It's the best way to punish any bad guys in any part of the world.

    • @abba3629
      @abba3629 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@AlexanderTch What is your problem with the World???
      Still stuck in Cold war era...!!

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@abba3629 You are not world, so, nobody gave you right to speak for entire world.
      We don't have problem with world.
      You do have problems with world. You bring wars, robbery and instability to this world.
      And we just keep stability and peace, because you understand only language of force. You respect this world only if you your face gets punched.

    • @juliap.5375
      @juliap.5375 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      AB Ba stuck in Cold War era? Can you explain, when it ended, Cold War? Maybe when anti-soviet sanctions was canceled after dissolve of USSR? Oh, wait, nothing was cancelled. All post-Soviet times Russia still was under sanction pressure. Maybe because was end anti-Russian proxy wars? Oh, wait, then why West supported radical islamists in Russia, people which captured schools and openly murder people, kids. All of them officially supported by West. Why then US transferred from Afghanistan terrorists on Russian south? Russia officially asked to stop that, US officially sent letter where said that will continue. Or maybe you means times when Arm Race was end? Oh, wait, but US withdraw in 2002 from treaty about limitations of missiles and started to install missiles around Russian border. Previous time it was end with Cuban crisis.
      Looks like it is you stuck in some parallel universe where Cold War was end.

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Русские геи Russia will not loose conventional war. USA knows that they would loose conventional war and that's why they developed nuclear weapons and used them.

  • @АндрейПавлов-ы2и
    @АндрейПавлов-ы2и 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    А где-то по далёкой, заснеженой Сибири, мобильный комплекс едет баллистических ракет. А за баранкой комплекса сидит сержант Василий! Вот Вася для Америки самый главный человек)

    • @АндрейМитенков-э6т
      @АндрейМитенков-э6т 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Азамат был прав

    • @PonchiK1968
      @PonchiK1968 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      На такие машины готовят водителей только после школы прапорщиков.

    • @BoBaH_BoBaHoB
      @BoBaH_BoBaHoB 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      У него нет пусковых кодов.

    • @smoothcarrot4642
      @smoothcarrot4642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you know about the Russian military killing Ukrainian Civilians?

  • @lavkmr1
    @lavkmr1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Russian bears ,RUNNN....

  • @yellowishyoutubechannel3900
    @yellowishyoutubechannel3900 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Nice love and respect to Russia from India 🇮🇳❤️🙏

    • @casual9982
      @casual9982 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why don't you go get involved in the invasion if you want to be on their nuts like that..

  • @Руловский
    @Руловский 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Северная Корея присоединилась к чату Соединенные Штаты Америки покинули чат

    • @qoralinks9386
      @qoralinks9386 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      first see this th-cam.com/video/8M3mVkKJslU/w-d-xo.html

  • @thesenate9564
    @thesenate9564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I am genuinely surprised the U.S.A was not on this list.

    • @nickirby459
      @nickirby459 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      The US has used the same ICBM since the 70s

    • @thesenate9564
      @thesenate9564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@nickirby459 I was referring to the fact that we Americans like bigger everything, especially weapons and was making a joke

    • @arvindkumarverma4196
      @arvindkumarverma4196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      This data is incorrect. US has more than 10 ICBM having range up to 13000+ km ...

    • @thesenate9564
      @thesenate9564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@arvindkumarverma4196 if size is the effect of range then yes the data would be incorrect. IF it is not however I was talking about the size of the missiles not their range.

    • @leefromnyc
      @leefromnyc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thesenate9564 usa best missile is only Minuteman-III manufactured by boeing in 1970. there was many types of usa icbm like Midgetman, LGM-118 and Titan-I but its all inactive now. Russia and China is on top when its comes to icbm, usa probably do airstrikes if theyre in war

  • @andrewwhite1479
    @andrewwhite1479 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    These missiles are dope !!!

  • @abhijitparida5093
    @abhijitparida5093 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Russia 🇷🇺 never compromises in Size and speed and power
    Love ❤ from India 🇮🇳

  • @alexp4932
    @alexp4932 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    So USA doesn't have any ICBM? What a peaceful nation indeed...

    • @luizs_9372
      @luizs_9372 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Alex P hmmm a country that harbors / carries nuclear warheads in its submarines outside foreign countries doesn’t need a intercontinental missile

    • @ItsRawdraft2
      @ItsRawdraft2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      They have, it's called the Minuteman

    • @thomassferopoulos6086
      @thomassferopoulos6086 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      But they have superman batman Catwoman ironman and many more guys.

    • @anshulbhardwaj4038
      @anshulbhardwaj4038 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      They have Trident and Minuteman

    • @yumyumeatthemup6
      @yumyumeatthemup6 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Peacekeeper missiles ...

  • @adrianjanume7744
    @adrianjanume7744 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Love Russia from Iran🇮🇷♥️🇷🇺

    • @djordjetodorovic4176
      @djordjetodorovic4176 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Love Iran from Serbia❤️🇷🇸

    • @s.s.9276
      @s.s.9276 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@djordjetodorovic4176 Love Serbia from Russia ❤️

    • @djordjetodorovic4176
      @djordjetodorovic4176 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@s.s.9276 check picture of lastnight footbal game between Crvenq Zvezda and Rangers

    • @futureintyumen3110
      @futureintyumen3110 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Love Iran - Serbia from Russia ! Fuck NATO !

    • @dickslaughter2
      @dickslaughter2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      🤮

  • @Gabrocol
    @Gabrocol 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    For this variation of the gambit I suggest not going too big or too small. That's why I suggest using the RT-2PM2 Cold-Launched Three-Stage Solid-Propellant Silo-Based Thermonuclear Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. Large enough to effectivly eliminate blacks pieces without creating too much collateral damage. Also remember if you are a beginner, try starting out with a guided tank missile. Start small then go big. The goal is to control the board.

    • @inemanja
      @inemanja 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      why so chessy? there is no MAD in chess

    • @lesjones471
      @lesjones471 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you said that too slowly,it set off before you finished writting

    • @Supermaneuverable_Sukhoi_Su-35
      @Supermaneuverable_Sukhoi_Su-35 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We know that chess is a political landmine of illegal moves, for example, launching an RS-28 sarmat silo-based liquid proppelant multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle equipped super heavy intercontinental ballistic missile is not possible due to the position of our knight on the 8th rank. The internation chess federation dictates that a piece can not move to a square occupied by a piece of the same colour. The spread of the multiple warheads carried by the MIRV-equipped RS-28 sarmat would cover the square that our knight already occupies, making it an illegal move which would result in the arbiter founding an internation coalition to impose economic sanctions against blacks pieces.

  • @РомРом-ъ8у
    @РомРом-ъ8у 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    I am again surprised at the incompetence of the authors of this rating.
    How can I collect Intercontinental and medium - range missiles, heavy mine-based missiles, and mobile platform missiles in one rating? All the Russian missiles listed here are Intercontinental, while "YARS" and "Topol M" are mobile platform missiles, and the rest are mine-based. Indian, Karelian, Chinese "DongFeng 4", these are medium-range missiles. China's "DongFeng 5", an Intercontinental missile.
    How can you compare weapons not by characteristics, but by size?
    Then compare a stone club and an iron axe.

    • @РомРом-ъ8у
      @РомРом-ъ8у 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Muhammad's sexy Pig
      Maybe I was wrong. (I'm too lazy to check the directory now). But to compare interior and mid-range, in any case, is not correct. And Yes, I don't smoke, I'm a specialist in "heavy artillery" - Smoking is for weaklings;-).

    • @РомРом-ъ8у
      @РомРом-ъ8у 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Muhammad's sexy Pig
      Nothing wrong. I like trolling. But on topic and with arguments. Why not Troll your opponent?

  • @masterdementer
    @masterdementer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Whoa Russians sure love ICBM's.

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Who doesn't? Russia has much more strategic nuclear cruise missiles also. More than USA

    • @walmart5460
      @walmart5460 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlexanderTch not surprised but america is getting a new nuclear missile that’s 20,000 times powerful than Hiroshima but I don’t like America

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@walmart5460 lol. Typical american. Bomb dropped on Hiroshima had power approx 15 kilotons (13-18). 200 000 times more power means approx 3 Megatons. That's 2-3 times less power than one Russian missiles SS-18 "Satan". Russia now is taking new type - Satan-2. Russia dropped 50 megaton bomb in 60s. So, USA is half century behind Russia and its land missiles are miserable. USA does not have any heavy missile and won't have for next decade or so. You lie.

    • @walmart5460
      @walmart5460 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlexanderTch but Russia missile are strong but still lack bud but the us is still behind but the gbsd yield is big it’s not 20 times powerful than Hiroshima it’s 20,000 why else you think they said about getting the missile because they are behind but we still don’t know the yield your a Russian hacker? but really the us sucks azz anyway and lol you said behind now I know your lying because they us isn’t behind but the research is in lazers or development of the new hypersonic missiles which the Russia beat the us in but the us will catch soon with a high yield nuke but them lazy azz fat racist mfs suck so us might need 10 years in the decade to get a high yield trust me the yes if Biden or the next president order nuclear research again they haven’t got research down because of George w bush didn’t order it if they had a chance and there’s no point of making new nuclear weapons so if propaganda or war starts the us will develop such a device

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@walmart5460 I know the yield. Unlike Russia USA starts to publish cartoons about about their superweapons much time before it actually appears. That's matter of money, advertisiment. USA are concerned about money, earning , not about protecting their homeland. That happened with F-35 , flying laser that ended with nothing and was cancelled after billions of dollars were transmitted from pockets of tax payers. In case of any ICBM USA would have already start screaming that they are best in the world. They can't do advanced ICBMs. They have ancient MInitman 3 and no others. They don't have any experts, scientists, workers, engineers that would have revived that area and USA is going down, it wont' rerover.

  • @XRP_Aj01
    @XRP_Aj01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    First time there is no USA 🇺🇸 lol 😆

    • @Nippless247
      @Nippless247 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Mass destruction and death is more of a communist thing.

    • @aerodynamic1440
      @aerodynamic1440 4 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      @@Nippless247 yes right, say that to Hiroshima and nagasaki, syria, vietnam...idiot😂

    • @doapin6240
      @doapin6240 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ᜉᜒᜎᜒᜉᜒᜈᜓ ᜀᜃᜓ Are you a Filipino?

    • @d7_xs350
      @d7_xs350 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@aerodynamic1440 both communism and captalism are evil and bad

    • @libertyprime9477
      @libertyprime9477 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      A.Mishal but capitalism is better in every way

  • @spsingh5824
    @spsingh5824 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ever heard abt russian satan 2.0

  • @AnishKumar-mm5hb
    @AnishKumar-mm5hb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Best technology missile INDIA 🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🏹🏹🏹🚩🚩😄😄😄😄🇮🇳😄🇮🇳🚩🚩🚩🚩

  • @thailand6989
    @thailand6989 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    TH-cam likes this channel.

    • @qoralinks9386
      @qoralinks9386 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      first see this th-cam.com/video/8M3mVkKJslU/w-d-xo.html

  • @BeliAndjeoSrb
    @BeliAndjeoSrb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Damn Russia take it easy.

  • @toomuchisaid928
    @toomuchisaid928 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    USA: 🥱 that’s cute I have a wormhole that’ll make a nuke disappear.

  • @nflarena1178
    @nflarena1178 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    How do you make this Missile Images?

  • @lucwick2463
    @lucwick2463 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Russia is the best in terms of missile.

  • @KronosOne
    @KronosOne 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    so how is that Ukraine is beating Russia according to the news?

  • @sivananthan3101
    @sivananthan3101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Talk abouth missille or any defence tecnological .russia is the most best . I am indian from malaysia .

  • @samnigam3451
    @samnigam3451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    RS 28 Monster 🇷🇺 Russian missile 👌. Love n respects to our Russian friends.
    Our Agni 6 at 10 🇮🇳💪but in future we should develop missiles like Russia...

    • @RealTheRunner
      @RealTheRunner 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not so great future you looking forward to.

    • @joupeganix3727
      @joupeganix3727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@RealTheRunner yeah right

    • @shukhratkhujasadikov2658
      @shukhratkhujasadikov2658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You should clear you street and country

    • @kdseidle8031
      @kdseidle8031 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yaaaaa!!! More Bigger Missiles! Do humanity a favor and just wipe us out now! It's in our nature to to destroy ours our selfs anyway! Hopefullly wildlife caries on without us! Respect animals more then the pathetic human race!!!

  • @unluckytrader1064
    @unluckytrader1064 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I want India to produce 16000 km range ballistic

  • @prajwalkamble3923
    @prajwalkamble3923 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    India s most trusted partner Russia 🇷🇺🇮🇳🙏🚩

    • @thefunatnight
      @thefunatnight 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You still want to be on that team?

    • @earnest1348
      @earnest1348 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thefunatnight India always with Russia, they provide us technologies from 1950s , it's our commitment. Always use veto to protect us from American sanctions.

    • @s.s.9276
      @s.s.9276 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TokyoFreeze China has many territorial disputes. Including with India. In general, the only country that borders China, but with which there is no territorial dispute, is Russia. Nevertheless, I do not see an irreconcilable conflict between China and India. I think Russia can act as a mediator in resolving their differences, because it has good relations with both of them. After this, an alliance of CIS countries + India + China, as well as Asia, will be possible.
      (ru)

    • @s.s.9276
      @s.s.9276 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TokyoFreeze This is called a mutually beneficial alliance. Now look at the alliance that Nato has: all of Western Europe depends on Russia's energy supplies, they have no nuclear shield, but the United States and Britain are pushing them into a conflict with Russia that is completely disadvantageous to them. Here is an alliance as strong as paper.

  • @AverageGodzillaEnjoyer69
    @AverageGodzillaEnjoyer69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Babe would you still love me if i was a R-36M (SS-18 Satan)?"

  • @carinhall4508
    @carinhall4508 4 ปีที่แล้ว +173

    РС -28 САРМАТ 💪🇷🇺

    • @weissoktoberman8613
      @weissoktoberman8613 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      К чему тут эта цацка для тупых хомяков?

    • @oc6653
      @oc6653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Помним, гордимся

    • @Axel-zq4jp
      @Axel-zq4jp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me: *Bring SS-18 Satan*

    • @qoralinks9386
      @qoralinks9386 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      first see this th-cam.com/video/8M3mVkKJslU/w-d-xo.html

    • @howardlitson9796
      @howardlitson9796 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ICBM is large missile. Non nuclear weapons

  • @LexXyr0IsHere
    @LexXyr0IsHere 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Hey guys, welcome to this new size comparison video - I'll break the ice with a solid 7 inches! ... Oh shit, this video about nukes!?!"

  • @dhruvdiwan2682
    @dhruvdiwan2682 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This is the power of Russia.
    love from India.

  • @cergeil1805
    @cergeil1805 4 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    Наши атомные дилдо, для наказанию врагов, самые большие😇😈😂

    • @Заяц-г8ю
      @Заяц-г8ю 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Чопик правосудия! :)

    • @smoothcarrot4642
      @smoothcarrot4642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you know about the Russian military killing Ukrainian Civilians?

    • @JINX-666
      @JINX-666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @nsms1297
    @nsms1297 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    North Korea spends almost its entire state income in Nuclear missiles 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      But it makes USA to be scared and they don't touch that proud nation.

    • @jamesorsby7553
      @jamesorsby7553 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, I heard that those people over there are so hungry that they've turned to eating their own crap. That man is heartless, but he'll get his one day.

    • @nsms1297
      @nsms1297 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jamesorsby7553 his father ruled the nation for decades, being rich with state income while his nation was in famines and he even died. It is due to China that this evil regime survives.

    • @jamesorsby7553
      @jamesorsby7553 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@nsms1297 Yeah, I can't believe that "fat boy" struts around like a peacock, while his people are starving to death everyday. Where the hell is the United Nations in this situation? Ain't that the whole damn reason for them being there? The UN is a joke, and should be dismantled in my opinion. As far as China is concerned, they're not particularly interested in changing their stance on North Korea because of that old saying, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". As long as the US and China are at each other's throats, China will continue to support North Korea no matter what because that benefits them against the US. I just feel sorry for those people.

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@nsms1297 How do you know he was rich?

  • @seldom44
    @seldom44 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love Russia. India and Russia

  • @plusminus7775
    @plusminus7775 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:03 this missile has the coolest name

    • @Techno1645
      @Techno1645 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      AKA The Satan 2

  • @antoleyo3857
    @antoleyo3857 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What are kind of fuels and what are kind of oxydizers?

  • @imllendream
    @imllendream 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The biggest of them all named SARMAT is a missile prepared to do seek and destroy on planet Mars in case US will try to open a military base on that planet.
    lol

    • @HolmesOO7
      @HolmesOO7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I mean it has the capacity to make a world tour of the earth thrice once launched. So sort of...

    • @JSKR6
      @JSKR6 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol no, so ur telling us they made a H-bomb to violate the space treaty incase America opens a military base on mars

  • @franciscoapr5007
    @franciscoapr5007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The sight of these Russian missiles make me fear what would happen if our laquoy Europe keeps on threatening Russian borders. NATO is putting all Europe at risk.

    • @maarten1115
      @maarten1115 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Also laquoy isn't a word, you Russian bots have some terrible programming.

    • @mybad.7164
      @mybad.7164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      hopefully we dont find out, Alot lot sooner, And just one of these could destroy England, So its stupid how they have just sent Javelins to Ukraine.

    • @xg-amer1140
      @xg-amer1140 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Damn you predicted the future

    • @harshnehara508
      @harshnehara508 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh boy! do I have a surprise for you.

  • @nimitzopsoi
    @nimitzopsoi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    at :25 you said this list includes missiles that are active but the first missile you show is still in development.

  • @Nileshpandey0907
    @Nileshpandey0907 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Agni -6 range is about 10,000km

  • @andy99ish
    @andy99ish 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The authors of this video apparently assume that a) missiles are used like stone-age clubs - the bigger the better and b) that the viewer is incapable of reading numbers.

  • @VELS436
    @VELS436 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It seems like russia mastered in missile technology...While US has best stealth bombers and aviation technology.......

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Russian aviation is better than US. Stealth crap was delivered to USA due to complicated spy games of KGB in 60s , so American spent billions for useless technology. Russia created something better in terms of stealth.

    • @digitalzeth1582
      @digitalzeth1582 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AlexanderTch Russia's aviation is a pile of junk.

    • @s.s.9276
      @s.s.9276 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@digitalzeth1582 About aviation. After Turkey bought s-400 air defense equipment from Russia, the U.S. refused to sell f35 aircrafts to Turkey. Why? Wouldn't it have been great to do tests and show how much superior the f35s are to the s-400s? That would have added to the desire to buy them from the US. Let's be honest, the f35 is tracked by the s-400, but the US is trying to hide it so that faith in their planes doesn't drop. And the s-500 would turn all US aircraft into scrap metal.

    • @STEVELILLEY011117
      @STEVELILLEY011117 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trident can carry 14 warheads per missile . 24 missiles per Ohio class sub = 336 14 Trident subs = 4704 warheads at sea . Enough to obliterate any country many times over.

  • @BK-gc1jm
    @BK-gc1jm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So United States is not even on the list? What the F**k

  • @lmaooxdd3899
    @lmaooxdd3899 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "RT-2PM2 TOPOL-M cold launch 3 stage solid propelant silo based or road-mobile russian intercontinental ballistic missle"

  • @ChristopherNicholasMakarov4120
    @ChristopherNicholasMakarov4120 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Glory to mother Russia 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 best country on earth!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @nordvlad
    @nordvlad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sarmat This rocket covers an area the size of France

    • @STEVELILLEY011117
      @STEVELILLEY011117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Trident can carry 14 warheads per missile . 24 missiles per Ohio class sub = 336 14 Trident subs = 4704 warheads at sea . Enough to obliterate any country many times over.

  • @hasannasah5870
    @hasannasah5870 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God willing that these kind of weapons will not use in the future

  • @jnaveen6317
    @jnaveen6317 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which ballistic missile. Strong in top10
    1) weight High in ballistic missile❓
    2) length ❓
    3) diameter ❓
    Anyone tell me please

  • @yashchauhan8518
    @yashchauhan8518 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    America be like :; Am i Joke to you??

  • @jhon-os3sz
    @jhon-os3sz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    RS 28 sarmat is a monster
    ViVa mother RUSSIA
    The real POLICE WORLD

    • @smoothcarrot4642
      @smoothcarrot4642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you know about the Russian military killing Ukrainian Civilians?

    • @jhon-os3sz
      @jhon-os3sz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      okay...& which country's military has killed thousands of civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen and others???

    • @smoothcarrot4642
      @smoothcarrot4642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jhon-os3sz I didn't know Ireland went on a middle eastern rampage

  • @martinjacovini2696
    @martinjacovini2696 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Notice that Russia, China and North Korea have most Intercontinental Ballistic Nuclear Missiles that probably to strike in the states? That is a serious concern and take lightly.

  • @BoBaH_BoBaHoB
    @BoBaH_BoBaHoB 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is better to sort by mass, not by length.

  • @amnotgamers4900
    @amnotgamers4900 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    _"Only God knows when the apocalypse will occur, but I can speed it up"_
    - Russia 😎

  • @amriteshkumarsharma3725
    @amriteshkumarsharma3725 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    @TheBuzz India have Agni 5 not 6.its range is 5500km

    • @vikaaas16
      @vikaaas16 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh kk

    • @rankingresearchdata
      @rankingresearchdata 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol
      Agni 5 have 6000-9000 km range
      & Agni 6 will have 12000-16000

  • @md.junaed4624
    @md.junaed4624 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Russia is the best for ICBM.

    • @Габриел-у5э
      @Габриел-у5э 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Russia is the best for everything

    • @supravatsarkar4090
      @supravatsarkar4090 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Габриел-у5э except missile's accuracy

    • @Габриел-у5э
      @Габриел-у5э 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@supravatsarkar4090 if u say so

    • @walmart5460
      @walmart5460 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Габриел-у5э bruh their missile accuracy isn’t that good their yield might be good but gbsd is coming but the yield might be powerful but respect to russia

  • @marcussv661
    @marcussv661 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you - !!!!

    • @marcussv661
      @marcussv661 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Колясик , У тебя чрезвычайно нестандартная мысль - !!! только один вопрос - ! зачем - ?????

  • @raterNAZ
    @raterNAZ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    lol USA has no large ICBM?

    • @abba3629
      @abba3629 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      USA 's 🇺🇲 50% Missiles with Nuclear Warheads are on Submarines and Aircraft Carriers... Dont forget they Very Close to every Nation.

    • @Mikhail_Artamonov
      @Mikhail_Artamonov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@abba3629 What is their problem with the World?

  • @Barmagloth
    @Barmagloth 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's all because americans have teenee-weenee pe.... ROCKETS, I mean rockets. =)

  • @armen2986
    @armen2986 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You just forgot the third world nuclear power that is France !!! you are not objective ... i would even say amateurism

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      France does not have ICBM, i.e. land-based strategic missiles. France has a few not ICBMs but SLBMs (Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile). This video is only about land based ballistic missiles. They are supposed to fly from one continent to another.

  • @SkySentry7
    @SkySentry7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    where is usa🤣

  • @barackeli5859
    @barackeli5859 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    DF haven't been tested independently and Chinese weapons are infamous for failure and malfunction.

  • @abirmondal2321
    @abirmondal2321 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Jai Hind.

  • @Kuntal-wx7bj
    @Kuntal-wx7bj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    America make best fighters and Russia makes best missiles

    • @juliap.5375
      @juliap.5375 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Russian fighters are much better. Whole bunch of technologies in fighters which just not exist in US.
      About missiles: US have access to borders of Russia and rest countries, while Russia and rest have no access to USA. So, rest forced to develop missiles. As example largest one here - Russian missile Sarmat. Why it so large? Because US installed around Russia anti-missiles, brought to Norwegia special ships for this, so if launch russian missile over North pole (as shortest distance between US and Russia) it can be intercepted. Moreover, if missile is slow, it also can be intercepted. So, Russia was forced to develop missile which can attack US over South pole (where is not American defense) and which fly fast. For this missile became bigger because need more power. While US... american forces stay right on border, second by importance Russian city they can attack just from artillery.

    • @thanos1838
      @thanos1838 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@juliap.5375 ok boomer

  • @prakashdensil3686
    @prakashdensil3686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    India india ❤️👍🙏😘🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @davidabia-okon6463
    @davidabia-okon6463 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where are the world's rest of IBM's??? The US, Europe, Australia or South America???

  • @LetsGO-po2wm
    @LetsGO-po2wm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Damn North Korea smallest country but powerful with nuclear weapons

  • @tanvirahmedsiddiquee127
    @tanvirahmedsiddiquee127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Indian propaganda. Agni never in number 10. Even the dreaming also impossible for India.

  • @sgtreznov9869
    @sgtreznov9869 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    russia literally invented ICBM missiles

    • @valentinapetrova9675
      @valentinapetrova9675 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Germany did

    • @valentinapetrova9675
      @valentinapetrova9675 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the second world war get your dam history right

    • @sgtreznov9869
      @sgtreznov9869 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@valentinapetrova9675 yeah you're right, Germany invented basic missiles
      but i was talking about 2 and 3 stages missiles

  • @simonblanco4864
    @simonblanco4864 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Forget climate change, nuclear amargedon is inevitable.

  • @birolcplak2960
    @birolcplak2960 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very funny to put fire extenguisher by the missile rocket truck 😜😜😜

  • @lesjones471
    @lesjones471 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Everyone noticed the tyres showing no weight at the bottom,those Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles are fake but to scare you,China does this also.I do not know why it has Fire Extinguishers on the front?

  • @thembacindi3863
    @thembacindi3863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Missiles against Who. Against Human kind. Foolish act.

  • @liamwilliamson5355
    @liamwilliamson5355 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The people ,that hit the button to one of these Demons ,will pay so dearly..

  • @Ingens_Scherz
    @Ingens_Scherz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What a load of nonsense. In this case, the physical size of the unlaunched rocket is totally irrelevant. The only metric that count are range, payload (with its own sub-metric) and accuracy.
    Try creating a video that includes those factors. You know - a relevant one.
    For instance: a Russian Satan II (R28) ICBM - which is far away from deployment status, by the way - has a range of 11000 miles and is reputed to carry 10-15 MIRVs. There is little information about the makeup of its payload beyond speculation about possible ABM countermeasure and warhead packages. There is no data about accuracy.
    In comparison, the now venerable SLBM Trident II/D5 missile system, operated by the US and UK, carries up to 14 MIRVs depending on the package option and a range of up to 7500 miles with four high yield MIRVs. It is very accurate, possesses proven effective countermeasures and because it is an SLBM has almost 100% survivability and can be launched from literally anywhere in the world.
    So you see, the Satan II might be superior in terms of size, range, throw weight and may even have some exotic warhead deployment capabilities, but it has limitations. It is so massive that it must needs a launch site or an enormous static silo, is liquid fuelled meaning it cannot be launched instantly, and is far from being operational.
    In contrast, Trident D5 is superior in almost every other way, not the least the most important measures of all: it exists, works, can be launched almost instantly, is accurate and could target the Satan II launch sites if need be (destroying them while they were being fuelled if it came to that), cannot be stopped and is utterly devastating.
    Big is not always better.

    • @krishthakar6661
      @krishthakar6661 ปีที่แล้ว

      Get your facts right Satan 2 has already been deployed and will replace all satan 1 by 2027

  • @mariannepompa4152
    @mariannepompa4152 ปีที่แล้ว

    2023 The new intercontinental ballistic missile RS-28 „Sarmat“ ( SS-X-30 Satan 2 ) with 10 nuclear warheads 18.000 km

  •  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where is SS-18 codename SATAN?

    • @Barmagloth
      @Barmagloth 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are not used since 1982. R-36M2 (R-36M's grandchild) was produced since 1983 and is still in service, I believe. Those baddies are really OLD, but test launches in 2009 shown that they are still capable to trash USA.

  • @Redman_real
    @Redman_real 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bigger doesn't mean better

  • @henryusbeck2198
    @henryusbeck2198 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where are the MINUTEMAN III ?

  • @yos339
    @yos339 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:25
    Its like "Croissant"

  • @winstonteo9207
    @winstonteo9207 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't think this video is up to date, where's US's Minuteman, China's DF 31, DF 41 ?

  • @IsaacVanos
    @IsaacVanos 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting

  • @esalalomani7618
    @esalalomani7618 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best missiles are the ones the World Don’t Know About!

  • @qasirabbass1932
    @qasirabbass1932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    PAKISTAN HAVE M I R V TECHNOLOGY........

  • @polonez611
    @polonez611 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sarmat is Very small

  • @bighit20100
    @bighit20100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are there no ICBMs from USA? Minuteman should be on the list no?

  • @apuuvah
    @apuuvah 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    EU needs to ramp up it's game. Military industry and everything else. First we need to make hypersonic glider vehicles.

    • @s.s.9276
      @s.s.9276 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This, of course, is a good thing. But russia is now the leader in hypersonic technology. Russia already has the s-500 Prometheus, which can shoot down flying hypersonic targets, as well as orbiting satellites and nuclear missiles.

    • @zussman4902
      @zussman4902 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Russia already have avangard glide

    • @daniGRewc
      @daniGRewc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You will make gayprides

  • @sealtheborder1300
    @sealtheborder1300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The U.S. isn't even in this, this video is biased. Where's the MX Peacekeeper, Minuteman III, and Titan II ICBM?

  • @pareshvartak143
    @pareshvartak143 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where is a USA 🧐

    • @LiterallyGod
      @LiterallyGod 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      We keep our missiles secret. Shhh

  • @johnduff1010
    @johnduff1010 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You will notice that there are no US or French missiles in this top LoL 😂

  • @Erakius323
    @Erakius323 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    These are the longest in length. Not the biggest. I assumed it would be rated in either, atomic yield, or, sheer weight of the missile.

  • @kombizz
    @kombizz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about American , European & Israeli nuclear arsenals?

  • @trstquint7114
    @trstquint7114 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crazy.

  • @dennycahyalie3775
    @dennycahyalie3775 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where's USA's ICBM?

    • @dartnhi7290
      @dartnhi7290 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      USA's has better range but it is short.

  • @nodoprinces
    @nodoprinces 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    But....the range?

  • @AggrarFarmer
    @AggrarFarmer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the biggest missile is Military Soyuz wich can carry 6 Tzar warheads.

  • @mehrdad85shk
    @mehrdad85shk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very high military budgets of some countries. Is it because of fear? Or dirty policies to separate the people of this planet from each other?

  • @peaceandlove.2932
    @peaceandlove.2932 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is the USA on this list???

  • @Руслан-ф2ь7ц
    @Руслан-ф2ь7ц 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Это канал для запада?
    Страх и трепет нагнетает на янки

    • @qoralinks9386
      @qoralinks9386 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      first see this th-cam.com/video/8M3mVkKJslU/w-d-xo.html

    • @smoothcarrot4642
      @smoothcarrot4642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you know about the Russian military killing Ukrainian Civilians?

  • @yaldenogosta1542
    @yaldenogosta1542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sarmat😘😗😗😍😎