New Weapon Designed By Russian Inventor Demonstrating Of Destroying US, Israel and Russian Tanks
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- New secret weapon designed by Russian inventor, Semenov Dahir Kurmanbievich demonstrating of destroying US, Israel and Russian tanks.
Chinese Army training shooting cannon round without cannon: • Chinese soldiers fire ...
Note: This video has been uploaded for education and entertainment purposes only and I do NOT own or support any party.
Support the channel here, www.paypal.me/...
Credits: • Изделие №1
*"Plus, we fire the WHOLE bullet! That's 65% more bullet, PER BULLET!"* -Cave Johnson
th-cam.com/video/6i-nMWgBUp0/w-d-xo.html
Sweet animation, but the physics behind the weaponry is far from realistic.
but still possible
I mean we built a rocket so anything is possible
There are unrealistic problems in almost every aspect shown here- guns that bury them self in ground and shoot tanks-
1.There is no way to know how hard ground will be, will it have rocks or mud and how deep gun would bury it self- maybe it completely sink in ground 4 meters deep or maybe it just hide half of him self.
2. Most likely a lot of them would detonate on impact to the ground
3. War isn't fought in fields it's fought in cities full of buildings, concrete, asphalt- burring in that is hardly possible.
CAN BE MODIFIED AT IMPACT WITH A DRILL HEAD FUNCTION
-TOPOGRAPHY WILL BE A FACTOR WHEN IN USE BUT ALL ROUND ITS A POSSIBLE IDEA
ITS ALSO BADASS
most animations are just an idea. usually nothing in the animations are realistic but it gives them a base starting point and the can work on them from there.
I love the way that huge transport aircraft can fly over the combat zone without anyone trying to shoot it down
Russian logic
Maybe they're at very high altitudes and don't have to worry about fighter aircraft because its a poor country they're bombarding.
maybe it's not a combat zone yet
@@AnonymousReader-er4eg maybe its iraq or vietnam
@@r3tro374 russia didn't bomb iraq or vietnam. But they did bomb Chechnya, Syria, Georgia, Crimea, etc.
GTA 2018: flying rocket bike with missiles
GTA 2020: Undetectable solar panel with aimbot
th-cam.com/video/hmzlfVWGYnU/w-d-xo.html
vqweeb The second one is smart.
GTA2022: Russian warship promoted to submarine.
@@michaelmontano4280 yes they are very useful in ukrain
Ho
That's hillarious. Ammo that doesn't need a barrel for accuracy. lol
Yh 1 did
I don’t think that the aiming would just be random, but the ammo wouldn’t go far without the barrel
It was rocket propelled
missles don't, on average. they're just expensive lol. one of those things would cost a bare minimum of $150,000 material, meaning well over $4,000,000 manufac cost to any branch of the us army (6 mil to the us marines).
they are probably tiny rockets
Well, 3D animation is nice, but clearly done by someone who doesn't know anything about how tanks or anti tank weapons work.
Evelyn Craine pretty much, oh yeah and don't forget the clickbait title, that just tops it off.
Evelyn Craine
Exactly.
You are correct. A2 Abrams has reactive armour, designed to destroy incoming ordinance before impact.
+Joseph Padron And you can't fire a shell without a cannon barrel.
Another channel took this exact same video and it also had some bullshit clickbait saying it was made by the US to destroy Russian tanks
Firing tank shells without a barrel Seems legit
(this statement was ironic. Im doing this because I'm still getting replies telling me that it's impossible...)
Dj Pandup too bad the shell would do nothing since you need the barrel for force and direction
technically you don't, it would just be inaccurate.
KAYRUNJAAVICE you do realize the barrel is there to maximize the gas expansion and force, right?
atgms
Maybe these are more like mini rockets or some shit
mobile strike ads are really getting carried away
So do the Legend27 ads
Cope3am I also started thinking of that
o
LOL
Cope3am Comment of the day!
When this game will be released on Steam?
Arma 4 lol
This is not a game
@@justakidplayz r/woooosh
@@Tilvent you didnt woosh him, nooooooo
@@braydenbird5651 what you mean?
Illogical physics. How would the ammo be capable to punch through, how would it accelerate.
type bunker booster on youtube
Sedna063 how it punch through? cumulative rounds (heat) can pen the same amount of Armour at any range or speed
Sedna063 imaginary barrel
Sedna063 Not only that newer tanks have protections against small rpgs. These things would have a hell of a time hitting them.
HEAT also needs some size (Caliber) and also against newer tanks, it often fails to work. Secondly, the explosive would ignite if they lad the way they do, because too much stopping power ( too high g-forces)
I called bull when they took out Merkavas in one hit.
Same, the active protection system should have been triggered. It might have been able to take an abrams, but then again an abrams cant even kill another abrams reliably.
Jul 'Mdama I call bull of the thing working even when it hit the ground
I call BS when I saw just the bullet from the solar panel and no barrel.
Pretty sure they're rockets but I'm not sure
English Muffin me too
"secret weapon" on youtube XD
I know. Like, if this was even sort of viable and still made it into youtube, then you just know that whatever they’re ACTUALLY using is much better.
Mr. S "hey dad, how did you beat the big scary secret weapons?" "well son, we watched their designs on TH-cam!"
You are stupid? Or you just think.
Well, you cant see the disguise of these weapons until too late
Sne4kY Hahahaha,good one
I doubt Russia will be getting it any time soon. There's a lot of design flaws for reality, but looks cool for a video game.
RedLine the panes in the video are American (C17 and the F22).
@@fuwaldaVL enemies tanks are Us M1 abrams and others
Sharkelon3754 Yeah the video is retarded
@@fuwaldaVL yeah but imagine an arma 3 type game like this
@@isziahs5951 would be fun
Sure, that is exactly what's happening in Ukraine hahahahahaha
I love how the aircraft operator just stands there. On a serious note, this would require entire fleets of cargo planes to get behind enemy lines without being shot down. Also, there's this little thing called IR technology and countermeasures that most tanks have - might have heard about it. Finally, a single shell of that size to the front of an MBT (usually its most protected area) would be unlikely to disable it. Oh, and why does that other design have solar panels if they'll get covered with fake grass?
Ivan Matz I guess they got those solar panels in order to recharge after they first revealed themselfes and destroyed the first wave/nearest enemy danger.
It's just a concept, there is no proof. A proof of concept is a working piece of hardware that shows the concept can work in the real world.
I wouldn't even call it a concept, it's just a cool-looking animation.
+Don't Askme hhcfh
fake grass? Are you that stupid?
0:32 oh, just kinetic bombardment
0:53 if it's kinetic bombardment, why using parachute?
1:19 SPANISH INQUISITION
So its no go too deep in ground
"if it's kinetic bombardment, why using parachute?"
Because its not kinetic bombardement?! Have you watched the video?
@@mifiwi3438 r/woosh
If you enter enemy territory with that plane you already win the war.
Who says that the opponent line need to be crossed for it? It just shows a tactical way to bring this weapons on(in) a field. It could be a field in a country which is offended by tanks from another country, too.
If...
Fun idea, but these weapons won't work. The designs are flawed. Creative though!
Sulli11 I agree, are the rockets controlled by someone or are they just fired randomly? Because it wouldn't look like a accuracy is not promised.
Firosniper123 from the way it looks they could be mass produced and they might place a lot and i mean a lot so 1 is bound to hit
Firosniper123 Yes indeed, a shell fired without a barrel or firing pin would be super accurate.
Yeah, just like your useless f22/35's
the wouldn't work that well but they could still do some damage
the second would require rockets.
well more like a barrel
i think they are self propelled
KAYRUNJAAVICE how
Yeah, those shells they showed wouldn't fire correctly without a barrel
I'm pretty sure the animation is simplified or something. But yes, it could be using a rocket launcher instead.
This new battlefeild game looks really good
Nereida Gomez bruh😂😂
lmao
Nereida Gomez it's coming out in 2019 so we have to wait a little bit. I thought the dames thing though.
Weird graphics dough
Hacked E3 footage we've all been waiting for.
Hmmm because spreading vast amounts of automatically detonated explosives into a empty field its a great idea.
a1919akelbo also tanks don’t drive into an open field that obviously
It is actually illegal for the most part.
The enemy might just pick them up and carry them home for reverse engineering. The tanks were just decoys.
they are not even automatically detonated, gee.
Lol I bet illegality has stopped people from perpetrating war crimes before.
what is this, infinite warfare 2.0?
MrHerobrine Ts.hahahahha
Bobby Keemstar umm you really think that this is something impossible? oh in that case allow me to present you with 21st century where we have very advanced and compact computer chips and rest is just hd cameras with rockets i mean you have no idea what hd means of course but yeah nor what rocket means for example you might be thinking of some space program shuttle by your 20th century standards but that is not the case as you can see so please adapt to your timeline or leave it
Ghasta nah to much world of tanks
Bobby Keemstar tanki online or tanki x they are both video games on Google
Ghasta I play my name is walday5711
Indeed. XD
2nd biggest joke in the world 😂
When I first saw the tubes drop from the plane and go in the ground, I thought that they were very over complicated land mines.
Dante Johnson Same here.
Physics: "Are we a joke to you?"
Anyone else find it funny the "Russian" aircraft are C-17 Globemasters and F-22 Raptor? ya know... AMERICAN planes
Сan be replaced by: Sy-57 (russian fifth generation fighter aircraft T-50) & Ty-160 (russian supersonic strategic bomber-missile carrier "White Swan"/"Blackjack")
Gunny's Gaming they were c-5 galaxies
Юлиан Фуфел Well, sorry to remind you comrade but your PAKFA (T-50 etc. etc. and blah-blah-blah) project has just been shut down by your ministry of defense... Jiist as well as the other "T" - T-14 Armata tank (panzer, in German, you know), which has been shut down too (for the reason of poverty after the sanctions). So the CG involving REAL American weapon systems is a real AHAHA and LOL
It’s just a proof of concept keep in mind he was killing American Israeli and Russian tanks
True
One more problem: almost all of the weapons are designed to destroy tanks. I don't believe tanks play an important role in modern warfare anymore.
They are a big part for attacking country and they also are good for defending cities.
Drones will always win, until lasers become a reality
CashewKing15 They already are a reality, there just banned in war because they blind people.
Chaotic Revenge Well the US has a laser weapon meant to take down Drones/Projectiles And Aircraft
ShimmyShit True, I guess lasers where you can see the beam are banned.
thats a new way to waste tax payer money!
yeah,because defending one's nation is such a waste...Better to live it to USA and NATO to "liberate it" along with Saudi Arabia and their lovely allies Al Qaeda/Al Nusra
Rick 1998 the entire system is overly complicated and impractical.
Conspiracy lol ? USA attacked half a dozen country and helped Al Nusra OFFICALLY,claiming it wasn't terrorist organization ! It is not conspiracy theory that they bully others by various means,not just war.They OFFICIALLY dumped over 20 tones of depleted uranium just in my country and are one of the few countries that use depleted uranium as a weapon...same weapon they claim could be used in dispersal affect by terrorist.
USA officially supports hundreds of various organizations for "democracy and human rights",such as white helmets who's few officials are ex terrorists and were caught many times making movie scenes as massacres and even holding AK's against civilians........
Also,who supported Al Qaeda until 2001? Oh...yeah :O Also,who attacked Libya and brought it "freedom"...in form of going from one of the most stable and wealthiest countries(with highest standard of living in Africa) to pile of rubles ? WHO released from prison one of Al Qaeda's leader to become 2nd in command of the revolution in Libya? Oh,right,let us not talk about that.Pfft...I mean,who knows how he got from USA prison to Libya :O I mean,he must have somehow "escaped" -_- Just wondering why USA did not catch him afterwards........
USA also OFFICIALLY threw bio and chemical weapons on Japan until 70s,as a test......OFFICIALLY ! This was admitted in the 90s and Japan,being a little bitch to their masters,had little to reply(except few "extreme"right wing politicians).
AND considering that USA ABANDONED MAD strategy that was accepted since USSR times(genesis of it comes from JFK talks during missile crises) by both sides and broke ALL deals they had when it comes to military expansion and nuclear weapons and development...yeah...that is not really sane
USA wages war around the whole world and literally supports various movements with all sorts of means,including info and weapons...sometimes even special forces,since USA special forces on a year bases act in around half of the countries in the world,mostly without consent or knowledge of those countries.
It is funny seeing someone so retarded to basically deny what his country officially admitted to doing,just because they now say they haven't....Either you are incredibly stupid and have short term memories,or you forgot your pills
There's no denying that the US is responsible for terrorist groups like Al Queda and the Taliban. But this is because of proxy wars between the US and USSR where these countries were no more than mere pawns working to further American and Soviet political interests. And the proxy wars took place due to the fall of European imperialism after WWII which left these countries vulnerable and unstable.
But back to the topic at hand, the actual weapons system presented in the video is impractical, ineffective, and a waste of money. This is due to the fact that we don't really have tank battles like we did in WWII anymore because major nations don't directly fight each other anymore and the battlefield is becoming much more advanced, these things would be easily detected. Also, the same effect can be achieved with artillery, airstrikes, and plain old tank mines.
Wolf Crimson A dirty bomb from most depleted uranium would be extremely ineffective. It is true that it poses health risks by inhaling it from a dirty bomb made from DU, but the effects wouldn't be felt uniformly and would take years to manifest, a bit too anticlimactic for terrorists.
The part with the solar panel being covered with grass🤣🤣🤣
What happen if they dont come in tank
Mandip Dhungana russian will rush B id they don't come with tanks
lol just drive with some udssr car the sensors will not detect
Then u lose
Direct hit by missile?
Cyka Blyat
I NEED ONE OF THESE THING OUTSIDE MY HOUSE ASAP LOL
*walks into yard*
*boom boom boom boom*
@@cocokitty212 😹😹😹
Me too...
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
let's say despite the massive design flaw and the fact that there is no chamber or barrel for whatever explosive that thing is shooting out of there. let's just say everything worked. The size of that missile would not be enough to blow up an A-1 Abrams tank. Do you even realize that the A-1 tanks have so many anti-explosive countermeasures built into it! Those things are specifically designed to deflect incoming RPGs and missiles like that. The tank has armored plates that are on the outside and have almost what you could call airbags on the inside of them and when they are hit with an explosive or high caliber round the airbag initiates and blows the plate off of the Abrams tank taking most of the damage and deflecting the explosive from making a direct impact.
Joshua Shaw lol this was a computer animation made by a snot nosed idiot in parents basement lol
I like that when an American sees that someone blew up A1 in his animation and the title says it was Russian weapon he just starts to spit and bite. This is not even a real army project, its probably just someone showing his animation abilities and ideas. I think that everyone got it but average American just see someone that dares to touch his countries honor and goes patriot mode.
The title kinda indicates that there is someone who actually thinks this would work.
I also think that this might work but it would need to be.. ehh "finished" (damn my english) These things in the video are pure undone projects/ideas. And the title must be a little clickbait-ish you know.
Joshua Shaw its called the m1 abrams, sorry just really bugging me out
Reminds me of a cutscene you'd see in the original Command and Conquer.
All of these have major problems like recoil, landing wrong, the first and last one will have battery problems, and the second one the arm might break from the recoil, and the first two will only work if they now if a army of tanks is going that way, last there is a high chance of missing because they don't have a barrel.
Carson O'Donnell Well, and the fact that the gasses from the shells would simply dissipate in every direction and the warhead on those shells would basically just pop out like, 10 feet.
Carson O'Donnell thanks for pointing that out. we will work it out next time.
the second one can only fire in a single direction and in landing can go eay off course like in a city.
and also they might shoot friendly tanks ;p
Carson O'Donnell also how the hell to they have the technology for all this shit, and how would they have a shit ton of ammo for those, with also being able to track our tanks that well, and wtf with the solar panels, that's kinda bs
"designed by russian inventor"
**shows american equipment**
ill be fair and say this looks like a bad WarGaming edit for WoT
My God..even Homer Simpson could think of better weapons systems ..
Each design is an exercise in absolute lunacy
Если это осуществимо в реальном космосе, то враги этих систем будут уничтожены. Давай чудо!!!
why don't russia and america just get along
zecheriah vassar Exactly what I've been saying for some time,and now with Trump as President. and considering the mutual respect he and Putin seem to have for each other,I think that just maybe our countries will begin working together more.I think the two of us should join forces almost forming as two location,single country in our separate hemispheres of the world,sharing resources,technologies, intelligence,etc. Together we would be unstoppable,even against the billions in China.
zecheriah vassar amen friend..it's cause my stupid government (US) thinks they need to police everyone but what they don't realize is that they are heading for a war with its citizens not Russia...they wanna keep blaming Russia for hacks when every intelligent American knows it was anonymous who did the hacking...they're gonna keep push us and everyone else around and we are about sick of it..we are gonna start pushing back. .trust me...we the people don't wanna fight with Russia..it's them and their bullshit agendas we citizens are about to snap back...they try to keep us divided using race but when push comes to shub we will all unite to fight the true enemy..money hungry crooked politicians
zecheriah vassar Geopolitics, opposing ideology. A long list of reasons remember the coldwar, NUCLEAR ARMS RACE, MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION, Cuba missile crisis, Pussy Riot, Crimes against humanity. Do you understand what Russian people think of the U.S. ?
zecheriah vassar Cuz Usa wants teverything and Usa sticks its nosw everywere and Europeans and Asians are sick of it
Joe McDonald, you are aware we are in the most peaceful time in all of human history, correct? And it honestly it will only be getting better as more troops withdraw from foreign territory. Most of the "radical" Islamist groups are groups fighting to defend themselves from us (not saying all, but most) If you want to combat that efficiently you stop funding tanks and begin funding schools in the region's. Education is the best weapon in long term warfare, not guns.
This is the least practical weopon I have ever seen. Damn Russia is getting depserate.
Leron Benari they're commies. What else do you expect?
Really? So blowing up a couple of tanks without actually expending any manpower is desperate?
And I thought you Americans knew how to understand English...
Its a fucking package carrying recoiless rifles. A couple of problems with this.
I see the rifles fighting leopards. In a NATO vs Russia situation Russia would loose air surperiority almost immediately.
The rifles magically know what part of the tank to target and magically pierce the frontal armor of a Leopard.
What if the guns land in mud?
Its a stupid weopon. Just use a guided bomb or cluster bomb to take out a tank.
it's a scenario, it's not real
Least practical as in it literally won't work.
0:33 me trying to catch the opportunities life give to me
Funding was allocated for this weapon as follows:
Putin skims off 50%
Lavrov skims off 25%
Shoigu skims off 13%
Inventor skims off 6%
Program scrapped due to lack of sufficient funding.
That was really dumb...... sorry maybe next time?
I had showed this to my friend and he laughed at the very end
Russia we also loved you from India 🖤🖤🖤 thanks for S400 monster missiles
Yes, the video is bullshit, but it isn't Russian, it's Ukranian
@@crnorizechrabar4879 Russia and Ukraine is the same
@@arolemaprarath6615 im mexican
@@arolemaprarath6615 okay racist
6 years ago. We have a war I aint seein these anywhere in the war rn
It is impossible
Rajesh Patil it isn't
brt d yes it is
Inventions are created to make impossible things possible..
No this is impossible, if you knew anything about weapons tech you would understand why.
Patrick Ellis there are recoil_less rounds for short ranges
Why are often germans the target???
Super Lord because They nazi
Panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger Im from Germany and Im not Nazi! Why erverybody is thinking this?! Das dritte Reich ist lange her! YOU have the name Panzerkampfwagen VI! The Tiger is a wonderful weapon and you are bringing shame about his name!
and also germans are lazy, they partying all of the week doing nothing because they rich because they stolle money from poland in ww2
Panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger hahaha nice Joke! I think you should better think about things you say. The war has ended a long time a go and you think we are celebrating parties with the polish money wich the americans had stolen!? How should it work? We are humans too and we are working harder as you think.
XDDDDD funny bro
Buddies don't war .Make peace. Make love
Russian Camouflage Vodtka Bottle?!
stupid
Alex 99812 its genius, u fuk
you not russian you not spell vodka good
Love the whole tank shell not even needing a barrel
the dude who made the last one should deffinetly be on a watch list
arent those american transport planes? the lockheed galaxy is the main tactical transport plane of the us forces.
Theres also F-22 escorting it cant be Russian
Max Noss It's all American.. Not at all Russian. I forgot which company, but, it big.
Max Noss the tanks look N Korean. And the drone looked American also.
Pretty cool stuff. Obviously prototypes but a great answer to Armored opposition. Save a lot of lives.
I believe it is a video from Lockheed for an concept on Anti-tank warfare. It has been out for years. Definitely not a Russian Inventors Idea. Note that clever editing on the 2nd tank wave attack. The information on the attacking tanks comes from a Predator Surveillance Drone, and the advancing tanks are Russian T-72 type tanks, but later on the destroyed tanks look like M-1 Abrams tanks.
Max Noss this is Ensign Chekov's version
first off all anyone would be able to spot a plane dropping around 100 items. second of all they could emp it then move in with tanks.
Alejandro Bermea rather than complaining how this wouldn't work without a barrel...yes they can use a rocket but you sir...
Great idea on how to disable this.
Szlekane i didnt say anything about it not working without a barrel
the plane could have flown a month ago
Why does the cartridge of the tank just magically dissapear after it shoots? And why do they have solarpanels if they are covered anyway?
Hum, very interesting concept so I’ll send it to our military thanks
Nah send it to a game dev
that's why tank need infantry to protect them
Fikri Djojosumitro
For infantry we have got ПОМ-2, ПОМ-3, КПДМ-4 and other. Don't go to Russia with weapon. Come with peace!
0:02 If you get something like that safely into enemy airspace you've effectively already won air dominance.
1:00 defenitly will be quite noticible and quite sizable impact crators around those..
1:43 Something destroying a tank (any modern tank) it hits head on? Bull lol
2:23 Ah yes, solar powered tanks... so they'll be slow as all heck and have extremely limited use
2:54 and now it covers it's (presumably) only power source.... okay then
4:00 since when was that undercarrige there? why is it killing out more power, that arm's gotta be a power hog lifting those heavy rounds... how is it hitting anything without any rifling.. or hell a muzzle
5:33 - 6:11 .... lol
A tandem round would be able to defeat quite a few tanks from the front, depending where they hit. And things like the Challenger 2 don't even have any armour in the lower plate, anything can go through that.
Come with me... And you'll be.. In a world of Pure Imagination!
For some reason this video is satisfying
This is impossible.
Mister Shekel not true it is very possible infact they r trying to make the rn
source?
This is retarded, the first thing is very impractical, they would work better as anti tank/personnel mines, and the second one is equally stupid as it is literally SHOOTING The SHELL, ignoring that fact, if the arm holding the shell/firing fin doesn't get ripped off the entire thing would get flipped across a field after shooting. Also what is the point in solar panels if they are going to be covered and the machine is going to be destroyed after firing one shell.
Science always make it possible when people thought that is impossible. that is why we are learning science.
matvie panzerкатуюш keyword trying one do you see the size of the first and the last they can only fit one shell in modern tanks or fitted with era the modern tanks can hardly take out each other with 120mm so what damage do you thing a tiny 90mm shell is gonna do and even if there rockets a challenger 2 took 70 with out a scratch they for cars and unarmoured convoys possible but thay will hardly scratch a leapord or a Abrams
The whole idea is pretty unfair to us
Furious Fist Not really. Even if it was real.
Furious Fist this video originally said it was the US weapons but they changed it last month
its american design, play closer attention that is an AMERICAN air plane, ...
Flawed as fuck. No way those things would work.
sectors clear NOT CLEAR NOT CLEAR
U.S. tanks have radars and scramblers those would never work :/
radar and scramblers hahahaha
*Watch a video about Russia culture and life on my channel*
Very creative! Maybe wouldn't work in terms of physics but this can be used for beneficial work like, save earth = better future 👍🏻❤️✌🏻️
sami Kilic how ?
TheGreenSadFrog of course certain clips in the video are possible however not all. One must understand the dynamics and have knowledge and perhaps experiences to understand 👍🏻❤️
But how can an idea like this save rhe world?
From the inventor of caseless ammunition, the next big thing: barrelless anti-tank rounds.
None of these are possible
Shadi Nachat That's what they said about the telephone
It's possible, just inefficient
Everything is possible, but probable? Very unlikely in any time in the future, and even then, by the time these are easily developed, other weapons will significantly have more of an advantage.
Rika R so it’s possible to survive lava with no equipment what so ever? XD
It is. People have survived such before without equipment, of course not falling into it directly or such, but think even of parachutes that failed for sky divers. There have been a few people to survive falls from a plane, with broken legs of course. Now if you put restrictions on things, of course you are going to find things that are nearly impossible, though there is the very odd chance something will do something beyond what we normally consider "possible".
How do the distinguish targets? What happens if the remain unused. Arnt land mine type things illegal
Zac Romero they are illegal anything that can potential hurt the innocent are banned from war that’s why these concepts are super unrealistic
Thats just unrealistic comedy you've seen. Even if it could work it would've cost all russian economy.
And, just to make clear: anti-vehicle and anti-tank mines aren't illegal, because they don't react to human steps. Only anti-personnel.
TRI99ER economy?
I’m sorry I felt this joke most be made
Nice... it will make a good episode for the Thunderbirds kids programs!
Search on TH-cam for "New Israeli technology" and you'll see this EXACT video posted in 2015, which precedes this video in 2016! This proves these are NOT russian technologies but Israeli technologies!
bruh these could be anybody's technologies and then some dumbass channels upload it as "Russia's new technologies which will destroy the U.S) to get views.
This proves this is an animation made by some troll to get people riled up about a technology that would never work.
Yeah and I saw one in early 2015 from Americans
why was that russian invemter using American made C-17's?
Ffiba Marih You know not everything is made is Fucking america. America just copies stuff (but not all some of there stuff are good)
How To you mean China copies stuff
+How To Wow, here you go again, saying the most moronic shit possible. You are blowing my mind today, it's quite fascinating.
Squiddi lmao North Korea probably doesn't even have the recourses to make many
How To no, but c-17's are
WWIII coming soon, bois
The moroness factory yea why
it is ww ııı
If second one would have bullet and missile both it would be fantastic and also it would be requiring a targeting system because the glider can easily be destroyed by other aircraft and the third can only be used if the having a small AI in it which would help in destroying it or a radar system because sometime AI cannot work when are not given proper internet connection as it will be underground.
Its nott possible how the Rocket get that speed look properly guyss
it's called intertia.
KAYRUNJAAVICE * BadUm ttssh* *clap×2*
KAYRUNJAAVICE Yup from 0 to 100 speed is called inertia.Clap x100
FlameSight lol holy cow how did i mix inertia with acceleration x.x thanks dude for pointing that out.
the rocket is light enough and has a fast burning propellant, therefore, it will accelerate quickly. inertia is what makes it harder to get startedl, so if the rocket is heavier, or the propellant isn't as fast, the rocket will take longer to accelerate due to inertia. clap x101
Sorry to burst your Russian bubble but this a promotional video released by Lockheed Martin in March 2022 which is why the aircraft are all AMERICAN.
xd. so ridiculous
that russian inventor must be 5 years old
if you ever heard about feint rocket made by russia(they not a ussr anymore) well you will get it
US has had highly classified ASAT weapons in space for 30+ years.
This is one of the reasons why Chinese so-called "carrier-killer" missiles, depending on satelites, are completely useless, and giving Allied CGSs complete freedom to roam the SCS at will
No Abrams and T-90s were harmed during this video
Wouldnt the guy loading out the weapons from the plane become an airplane himself and be launced out at hundreds of kilometers an hour. Also if this is the future wouldnt those aiplanes able to see with a heat Gun or something to see these obviously not invisible things on the ground about to shoot them. Its not possible for a bullet with gunpowder to be launched without a cartridge to be lauched from. Where goes the shell? Since it reloads it must be swapped out and the cartridge cant be launched with the bullet itself. Also wouldnt it need a hammer to ignite the gunpowder and create an explosion to even launch the bullet or something?
Also it would also need a barrel for any presicion like that.
Good animation tho 2/10
With a a few improvements it could perhaps be possible, if you use recoiless barrels, its could work, they had those things in ww2 i think
Something to ignite the bullet could be at the base or inside the cartridge of each round. Those things would need to generate heat to be able to be seen by thermal cameras or scopes. Although everything else you mention is true and for the most part this wouldn’t work.
Ion Josan Ok. Thanks for clearing that up
Also if they drop those how are they gonna survive shelling
We would live as gods if we address all this engineers effort to make our life better
"Anyone wanna to play some ballistic lawn darts?"
bull shit u need biger guns to take a out at mordern tank
thats not a gun....its a missile
what kind of missles uranium?
james fire xxzxxx
Roby Roby what's your back ground in eninering what your background play war sim don't make u a pro can you explain how there wepens will be efictive in real life
Haaah!....They were not tanks...they were Transformers..
Putin: WTF!!!!
Tu byłem,Tony Halik 2022.
Nice game. Name please. Only attackers no defenders. 🤔
XDDDD
This cringe shit looks like promo of a very cheap game XDDD
You can't be serious.
This is an American animation btw. That plane is the largest in the US military and this is a US military concept
ok,,,,,,,,,
Md abid
gtretjjs
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Whoever designed the anti tank vehicle was clearly dropped as a child
Yeah those bullet throwing trebuchet looking things would be so highly innacurate it's ridiculous
Actually the second one is clearly possible. . You wouldn’t need a barrel because. After it takes flight the sensors through the radio or satellite control guide the anti tank round to the targets. Much like a tomahawk or a guided bomb dropped from a plane
how could the US secret service counter the threat of that autonomous sentry gun against the president's car?
That's how mafia works my dudes
That act is a furtherance of letting the public know how important they are . |
We have already received it. Poseidon, Dagger, Vanguard, Peresvet, Sarmat in the army and Petrel in development. And what was drawn here is easy to do if necessary. You laughed like cartoons in 2018)
MUCH LOVE AND RESPECT TO RUSSIA... Defend Your People
Зачем нам уничтожать Израильские танки?
So, it's a minefield.... I doubt that big, heavy platform would get within 50 miles before it goes down in flames.