I must have heard this recital on the radio, nearly 30 years ago. I've never forgotten it, and at last we're reunited. What a genius performance, not to mention a brilliant piece of recording and quality of sound. To think all I've owned up to now is Gielgud's partnership with Dudley Moore in 'Arthur'.
A very ominous poem. Although the name Ozymandias (which means "a tyrant, a dictator, a megalomaniac; someone or something of immense size, a colossus") has Greek roots and dates back to roughly 323 BC, Percy Bysshe Shelley brought the word to prominence in 1818 after publishing a sonnet by the same name.
An underrated orator of a tier, higher than L. Olivier (not a popular view) but may not be as adept, as, Charles Laughton, so what period is his soliloquy; 1929 - '36'?
I must have heard this recital on the radio, nearly 30 years ago. I've never forgotten it, and at last we're reunited. What a genius performance, not to mention a brilliant piece of recording and quality of sound. To think all I've owned up to now is Gielgud's partnership with Dudley Moore in 'Arthur'.
+stuart griffith Journeys end in lovers' meeting )
This is the moment John Gielgud became Heisenberg.
jesse!!1 WE NEED TO COOK!
Brilliant. Languid, commanding and austere. Using this reading for my tutorials. Reccomended.
I heard Ozymandias is the Greek name for Rameses II.
That is correct!
A very ominous poem. Although the name Ozymandias (which means "a tyrant, a dictator, a megalomaniac; someone or something of immense size, a colossus") has Greek roots and dates back to roughly 323 BC, Percy Bysshe Shelley brought the word to prominence in 1818 after publishing a sonnet by the same name.
👍
enjoyed the delivery...................( especially gielduds tremoulous voice quiver)
His readings and recitations are downright musical. What an amazing talent
What a voice 👏
1818. Did Shelley have Napoleon in mind ?
+stuart griffith Hard to be sure, but it looks like Napoleon has definitely got something to do with it.
More likely George III and maybe the Church, since he was a big atheist (hence 'king of kings'). But it applies to anyone in power really.
This poem would fit pretty well for modern day nostalgists of the British Empire.
I think so. Put not your trust in Princes.
No, Lord Byron . That , according to Andre Maurois . I forget in which book he states this but it is likely to be Ariel or Disraeli .
An underrated orator of a tier, higher than L. Olivier (not a popular view) but may not be as adept, as, Charles Laughton, so what period is his soliloquy; 1929 - '36'?
Wonderful! Thank you.
It’s just too pukka to enjoy. It’s so over the top.
Ozymandias in Tripod Trilogy amen
gcse students like this
Gielgud hams it up too much.
Agree but it was the style back then, a vestige of the Victorian stage.