The test isn't bad in concept, but you would have to run the same test multiple time in order to unskew the results you get from the RNG nature of the game. Your best performing gun in the last trial, was also you worst weapon in the second test, because of unlucky hits causing death. The same issue affects the results showing the M16 to be the worst rifle.
@@bottomboygaming7699 He's not wrong about the RNG though. Sometimes I've walked a team into a courtyard without utility and killed everyone in there with a few injuries. Other times 1 of the squad gets killed by the first bullet fired by the enemy who got caught unaware.
I love the concept but wow. This isn't even the slightest bit entertaining as a study never mind credible there's absolutely nothing done for a control, the counter RNG, the test isn't fair fundamentally. You would need to go the same ONE op (may all be max but their attribute points are CLEARLY different which has a huge impact) about 100 times AT LEAST ideally nearer 500 to be worth it having any impact on choices folk should make. I could go on but yeah, this is more amusing as a show of how NOT to run a test
The test isn't bad in concept, but you would have to run the same test multiple time in order to unskew the results you get from the RNG nature of the game. Your best performing gun in the last trial, was also you worst weapon in the second test, because of unlucky hits causing death. The same issue affects the results showing the M16 to be the worst rifle.
It really shows that the most reliable thing isn't the weapons, but your planning.
@@bottomboygaming7699 He's not wrong about the RNG though. Sometimes I've walked a team into a courtyard without utility and killed everyone in there with a few injuries. Other times 1 of the squad gets killed by the first bullet fired by the enemy who got caught unaware.
@@SpartanDRJJ I mean, in war the same shit happens, and enemies all have diffirent kinds of weapons.
Make the enemies look away, might reduce the chances of getting your dudes shot.
Not a bad idea. Now if only they would shoot unarmed opponents.
@@bottomboygaming7699 👀
@@bottomboygaming7699 suicide bomber-
Great demonstration, many ideas for weapon tests are now coming to mind. Cheers!
That's a very clever test and has given me some ideas. Thanks
M4 seems to outperform everyone else. Epic
What about optics and ammunition
Another thing to consider is different operators have different stats
Unless they’re max level*
The video thumbnail looks like a weird tarot card.
You know, I've never heard the thumbnail described quite that way. Maybe i should just stick with boobs.
@@bottomboygaming7699 that would probably be best.
A flaming Illuminati pyramid with eyes on top.
The individual operator's rank and skill attributes should be taken into consideration too!
all of the attributes and rank were the same
Thats pretty kool kneat idea to for antest
Now do it with Machine Guns and use the suppress feature lol
th-cam.com/video/_S5l2Mn1erM/w-d-xo.html
Is this available on the workshop?
the test isnt fair if u use operators with different skills...
I didn't. They're all max rank
I love the concept but wow. This isn't even the slightest bit entertaining as a study never mind credible there's absolutely nothing done for a control, the counter RNG, the test isn't fair fundamentally. You would need to go the same ONE op (may all be max but their attribute points are CLEARLY different which has a huge impact) about 100 times AT LEAST ideally nearer 500 to be worth it having any impact on choices folk should make. I could go on but yeah, this is more amusing as a show of how NOT to run a test
What the fuck is a ‘assault weapon?’
I didn't realize the definition was ambiguous. It just has to hold a 30rnd magazine clip
Assault weapons don’t exist just assault rifles