Thanks man, I’ve accepted that quality generally trumps quantity and I’m trying to pace myself with it a bit rather than just uploading to keep content flowing.
Just came across your page for the first time. I’m normally watching gs and long shot but I’m def gonna give u a chance. Great video, you getting those kills on the 2 f18’s reminded me of how a su 27 killed me and my friend in f16s a few days ago. 😂 Subbed
not bad for an amateur pilot most of you use the plane at low altitudes that plane is made for high altitudes and with those rockets it can shoot down the target effectively at distances of 50-60 km R-27 R/T and in the last 5 km they guide themselves to the target without the plane having to radiate the target, which is not well represented in the dcs like that and for r-27 er/et
The R-27R absolutely can’t effectively knock out targets at 50-60km, generally you’d be lucky to score a kill within 20. Maybe head on at Mach 2 above 30k ft with a contact also head on at Mach 2 above 30k ft it might just about get there if the target consciously chose to fly directly forwards into it, but if they manoeuvre with any desire to continue living, its missing. The ER? Maybe, but still highly unlikely.
How can a SARH missile find the target without illumination? Are you saying the 27R/ER has some sort of dual guidance, which I've never heard about in over 25 years?
@@fonesrphunny7242 The Flanker in DCS - along with other radar missile equipped lower fidelity aircraft - benefit from more simplified modelling; one of the quirks is that when a lock is lost, the missile will continue to guide for 3-5 seconds which in reality is supposed to follow a predicted path based on the most recent telemetry data from the radar, but because modelling that properly would be difficult the missiles in the game just know where the target is and track by magic for a few seconds instead. The other commenter is either talking with confidence about things they don’t understand as well as they think they do, or they’ve misunderstood the game’s simplified approach as being true to life, when it isn’t.
@@Bullet4MyEnemy Haven't heard about or noticed that quirk, and I played a lot of Su-27 ... before I got my F-16. Then again, if I have to drop lock for any reason, I'm probably not going to look for my own missile. Good to know I didn't miss a critical feature of the real r27. But that 3 second "grace period" is baffling. Calculating the intercept continuously is easy. Once lock is lost, stop updating and let the missile go there. Maybe not 100% accurate, but miles better than giving missiles magical powers.
Yeah it is easy, when I said “would be difficult” I mean, if you’re lazy as sin like Eagle Dynamics - who could easily implement a million things to make the game better but choose not to unless they can charge for it. Standardised damage and radar modelling would be top of my list, but they’ll never do it for free. So they’ll never do it.
I did hop on to check out the new effects and save some evidence of the current economy’s state, when the economy changes actually roll around I’ll be aiming to do a comparison - I also might try ground pounding in sim to see how the missile guidance nerfs have altered things. I’m monitoring it, basically. May or may not amount to a video, we’ll see.
@@medic6039 I’m hopeful, yeah - hopped on yesterday to check the new effects and play an EC match to gauge rewards so I can compare directly when the changes come in. The nerf to missile guidance sounds intriguing too, played a ground sim match in the A-10 and did a lot better than past attempts, actually died more to helis than anything on the ground - that Z-19 thing needs to die in a fire.
Hey bullet, I’m just curious. What do you use to record with, and what cpu do you have? Also, do you recommend 64 gigs for DCS? I’ve been noticing my usage hits 30 gigs out of my 32 when I play haha 😅.
I have a pretty outdated CPU now, really need to upgrade it to match my GPU a little better, I’m only running 32gb RAM too, seem to get by fine, but more can never be a bad thing. Specs are in the video description. Probably next year I’ll be looking to upgrade everything to better match my 4070ti, but I don’t have the dosh handy atm.
@@Bullet4MyEnemy gotcha, just fair warning… I did a lot of testing with AMD and Nivida, along side intel and AMD CPU’s and found that Nvidia GPU’s communicate and run more efficiently with intel cpus’s and AMD gpu’s to AMD CPU’s. Tested on multiple games and noticed that sometimes a 7950x3D paired with a 4080 OC would be outperformed by a 5800X3D and 7900XTX. Not sure if this is helpful at all, but when I play cpu heavy games I tend to play on a different rig that is AMD exclusive, while when I play GPU heavy games I switch to my other rig which is intel and Nvidia.
@@Bullet4MyEnemy I tested DCS heavily and found that a 5800x3d with a 4080 would be outperformed by a 5800x3d and 7900xtx, which really shouldn’t be happening.
Your editing is getting really good. Really good pacing in the vid, and great external shots. Keep up the great work
Thanks man, I’ve accepted that quality generally trumps quantity and I’m trying to pace myself with it a bit rather than just uploading to keep content flowing.
First video I ever saw from you. I'm impressed. You should do more Flanker videos.
sneaky sneaky tricksy flanker
flanker my beloved
Really love the camera angles you made. Feels like something out of Ace Combat (cinematic wise)
YT algo blessed me with this channel, I'm subbing
Welcome to the fold 👌🏼❤️
Just came across your page for the first time. I’m normally watching gs and long shot but I’m def gonna give u a chance. Great video, you getting those kills on the 2 f18’s reminded me of how a su 27 killed me and my friend in f16s a few days ago. 😂 Subbed
Ooh flanker vid. this ought to be good
Extremely entertaining!
I enjoyed every minute.
I love the SU-27 and EOS is how I get the most of my kill's...
not bad for an amateur pilot
most of you use the plane at low altitudes
that plane is made for high altitudes and with those rockets it can shoot down the target effectively at distances of 50-60 km R-27 R/T and in the last 5 km they guide themselves to the target without the plane having to radiate the target, which is not well represented in the dcs like that and for r-27 er/et
The R-27R absolutely can’t effectively knock out targets at 50-60km, generally you’d be lucky to score a kill within 20.
Maybe head on at Mach 2 above 30k ft with a contact also head on at Mach 2 above 30k ft it might just about get there if the target consciously chose to fly directly forwards into it, but if they manoeuvre with any desire to continue living, its missing.
The ER? Maybe, but still highly unlikely.
How can a SARH missile find the target without illumination? Are you saying the 27R/ER has some sort of dual guidance, which I've never heard about in over 25 years?
@@fonesrphunny7242
The Flanker in DCS - along with other radar missile equipped lower fidelity aircraft - benefit from more simplified modelling; one of the quirks is that when a lock is lost, the missile will continue to guide for 3-5 seconds which in reality is supposed to follow a predicted path based on the most recent telemetry data from the radar, but because modelling that properly would be difficult the missiles in the game just know where the target is and track by magic for a few seconds instead.
The other commenter is either talking with confidence about things they don’t understand as well as they think they do, or they’ve misunderstood the game’s simplified approach as being true to life, when it isn’t.
@@Bullet4MyEnemy Haven't heard about or noticed that quirk, and I played a lot of Su-27 ... before I got my F-16. Then again, if I have to drop lock for any reason, I'm probably not going to look for my own missile.
Good to know I didn't miss a critical feature of the real r27.
But that 3 second "grace period" is baffling.
Calculating the intercept continuously is easy. Once lock is lost, stop updating and let the missile go there.
Maybe not 100% accurate, but miles better than giving missiles magical powers.
Yeah it is easy, when I said “would be difficult” I mean, if you’re lazy as sin like Eagle Dynamics - who could easily implement a million things to make the game better but choose not to unless they can charge for it.
Standardised damage and radar modelling would be top of my list, but they’ll never do it for free.
So they’ll never do it.
I have a question how do I change it to where I can see my pilots hand and body in the cockpit
Where the option is available the keybind is RShift+P
I actually enjoy ur videos ...cuz of voice over .... reminds me of OPERATOR DREWSKI
He is one of my favourite TH-camrs for DCS content 👌🏼
@@Bullet4MyEnemy wow...!!! 😲
R-27 is a beast of a Fox One.
Piece of art
They need to make a full fidelity su27s
Best video yet Ed.
Great vids!Keep it up.Any thoughts on the economy roadmap from gaijin?are you gonna post a vid about it?
I did hop on to check out the new effects and save some evidence of the current economy’s state, when the economy changes actually roll around I’ll be aiming to do a comparison - I also might try ground pounding in sim to see how the missile guidance nerfs have altered things.
I’m monitoring it, basically. May or may not amount to a video, we’ll see.
what are the little things on the wing tips?
They’re jamming pods… That I didn’t actually use and cost me 2 R-73s 😅
@@Bullet4MyEnemy reckon youll do anymore WT content when/if the eco changes go through?
@@medic6039
I’m hopeful, yeah - hopped on yesterday to check the new effects and play an EC match to gauge rewards so I can compare directly when the changes come in.
The nerf to missile guidance sounds intriguing too, played a ground sim match in the A-10 and did a lot better than past attempts, actually died more to helis than anything on the ground - that Z-19 thing needs to die in a fire.
Beautiful 🤌🏻
Hey bullet, I’m just curious. What do you use to record with, and what cpu do you have?
Also, do you recommend 64 gigs for DCS? I’ve been noticing my usage hits 30 gigs out of my 32 when I play haha 😅.
I have a pretty outdated CPU now, really need to upgrade it to match my GPU a little better, I’m only running 32gb RAM too, seem to get by fine, but more can never be a bad thing.
Specs are in the video description.
Probably next year I’ll be looking to upgrade everything to better match my 4070ti, but I don’t have the dosh handy atm.
Sorry, missed a question; I record using GeForce Experience
@@Bullet4MyEnemy gotcha, just fair warning… I did a lot of testing with AMD and Nivida, along side intel and AMD CPU’s and found that Nvidia GPU’s communicate and run more efficiently with intel cpus’s and AMD gpu’s to AMD CPU’s.
Tested on multiple games and noticed that sometimes a 7950x3D paired with a 4080 OC would be outperformed by a 5800X3D and 7900XTX.
Not sure if this is helpful at all, but when I play cpu heavy games I tend to play on a different rig that is AMD exclusive, while when I play GPU heavy games I switch to my other rig which is intel and Nvidia.
@@Bullet4MyEnemy I tested DCS heavily and found that a 5800x3d with a 4080 would be outperformed by a 5800x3d and 7900xtx, which really shouldn’t be happening.
Fulcrum next 😉
How did the guy see enemy planes when you lost them from DL?
Line of sight with the radar emitter, some degree of desync, gameplay magic 🤷🏼♂️
Not sure honestly.
Nice
Was cool
This camo is greek roundels
I know, I thought that might annoy some people lol, I just thought it looked cool and it’s actually called Ghost so I thought it was fitting
@Bullet4MyEnemy in dcs call ghost but in the ream life called agean blue thank you7 for this very good videos
ΗAF skin 😳😳😳
F-15E Just dropped bullet!
Whaaaaat?!