This Documentary is a People Profiles Production on the life of Edward VIII. Please subscribe to their channel for more: www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfiles
Very interesting but I have to disagree with one point. Wallis didn't have a long suffering second husband. They BOTH colluded to use Edward for whatever they could get out of him. They were both gold diggers and social climbers. She intended to leave Edward if he got too serious but he threatened to commit suicide if she did. I may be wrong but I think he even attempted it once to prove he was serious. She had no intention of marrying him, only ever using him, but couldn't have his death on her concscience. She begrudgingly divorced her husband. She treated Edward appalingly and with utter contempt thereafter. Trapped in a loveless marriage. After they married she still wrote to her now ex husband for two years. Letters saying, what have we done, how much she missed him and still loved him and how heartbroken she was. She was trapped and hated Edward for it. She spent the rest of their marriage putting him down in front of guests and ridiculing him for his perceived stupidity. Somehow he still seemed enthraled by her. Be careful what you wish for! This is facsinating... th-cam.com/video/Swd3ISRF_wY/w-d-xo.html
Actually, George V was not the eldest son of Edward VII. He had an elder brother named Albert who was the Prince of Wales, and he passed away while Queen Victoria still reigned. He was named after Prince Albert of course as Queen Victoria had decreed for at least one member of each generation thereafter in the Royal Family. It was on his passing that George became the first in line to the throne, and acceded to it in 1910.
And if correctly remembered, Mary of Teck was to have married the son of Victoria who died. But Victoria really wanted Mary as a daughter in law and had her marry George. Fortunately, that union was fruitful in every way with the sad youngest son John who had epilepsy and mental slowness and he died in his teens. But I stand corrected here.
As a country we dodged a bullet with David's abdication. He was a weak man, easily led, and I feel they both came to regret the marriage. Wallis certainly did, as is illustrated by her letters to her former husband.
@@Roz-y2d Harry's not weak. Harry his wife & child & fled for their safety. He doesn't get the generous allowance the duke of windsor got (and Andrew gets.) He had just get in w/it. And nice of you to compare an aa woman to a damn nazi.
@@Roz-y2d African-American. They were at least sympathetizers. The Duke of windsor also incouraged the blitz, hoping eng would surrender & the Germans would put him back on the throne.
……Edward had arrested development set at age 14. He was a simp. Not fit for purpose as a King. Excellent for Britain, he was forced to abdicate by the P M, the A of C, & Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon…………
Even IF he wasn't a traitor, he still ran away from his responsibilities as king. I agree with his assistant private secretary, Alan Lacelles, who thought "...that the best thing that could happen to him, and to the country, would be for him to break his neck."
When did Harry committ treason? When? Because he spoke out about the ill treatment his wife was receiving? Because he exposed that the Royal Family are racists? Edward did committ treason . Hitler and Edward made a secret deal that if Germany invaded and conquered England , they would restore Edward to the throne as Hitler's puppet king . Big fucking difference !
@@freyasslain2203……yes, it’s long been thought he passed battle plans’ of the Allies’ in France, to the Germans’………that’s treason, & he should’ve been court martialled for it. In war time, that carries a death sentence………
@AndyAnderson-b9u Why not ? Were not the royal family filled with Nazis , starting with the Duke of Windsor. Haven't you read certain correspondence , between Churchill and Roosevelt? You know Churchill informs Roosevelt of Hitler's plot to restore The Duke of Windsor to the throne? Apparently, the Duke of Windsor and Adolf Hitler brokered a deal that if Germany conquered Great Britain, Adolf Hitler would restore The Duke of Windsor to the throne ? Wasn't Queen Victoria 's youngest grandson , Charles Edward - Duke of Coburg served The Third Reich . And Wasn't one of their cousins , The Prince of Waldeck -Piermont , didn't he serve the Third Reich as a Camp Commandant of the Buchenwald Concentration camp ? Oh and what about The Princess of Hohenloe - Langenburg? Aaaah yes. That family was filled with Nazis. I think Henry's Halloween costume was quite appropriate of this family . Don't you think ? My advice : Before you cite anything relevant to World War Two , be very careful how you tread . You just might run into a historian . Someone who can and will mop up the floor with you .
I do fully understand if someone who is born to become King or Queen chooses to thank for that. I believe strongly they are allowed to do so. No one should be forced to take the roll.
I'm far from a monarchist, but I can't help but feeel almost a touch of Providence in replacing a weak and morally compromised man like Edward VIII with a much better king (and man) in George VI.
Of course he did conspire with the Nazis. In part, major part that he was the Submissive of Wallis. And in the minority his own feelings towards war and suffering.
Seems ridiculous, even comical, to suggest he was not a bright mind and that all of a sudden, Germany would listen to him on military strategy and decide, based on something he said to some Portuguese businessman in private, to bomb London. Germany most likely already had that plan in the offing way before and it was part of the natural processes of war. First take care of your immediate enemies then the more distant ones. I venture to say also, that most likely the Germans did not regard him as a brilliant strategist of warfare and therefore would not follow advice from him nor anyone else who like him, did not have a true military career.
I stand firm in my faith, trusting God's plan. Grateful for blessings, I thank Him for prosperity. My family's happiness is restored, and retirement brings unexpected abundance, $57k weekly returns, a life transforming miracle after past struggles.
Giving her my initial savings of $12,000 to invest in a brokerage account was a turning point in my life. It's been an incredibly rewarding experience and the best decision I ever made!
Investing can be a powerful tool for building wealth and securing financial stability especially in this hard time. but it’s important to understand that it’s not without its challenges. The investment landscape is inherently volatile, with periods of both gains and losses. This variability is a natural part of investing and requires a clear strategy and patience to navigate effectively.
Before I say my peace, I believe things went the way they were meant to back then.... And the UK had the best choice for the monarchy. But how unfair it was/is that they couldn't marry and still be part of the family and Harry and Megan could and did. Also look at the trials that Princess Margaret went through in her relationships. Quite unfair. Quite.
Maybe misguided but not a traitor The real traitors were the treaty with poland instigators Who failed to help before Declaring and after declaring War particularly the french Who had no offensive strategy!
this title is a lie. A King can never be a traitor, for he is the head of state. Quite the opposite happened, he was betrayed, and history is being written by those who betrayed him!
He was seen as betraying the people, but you’re right, he was betrayed by his family and the government coz he was ousted. But I just can’t feel sorry about that!
Why did the authors of this documentary choose a subject about whom they have such negative feelings? If you don’t like or approve of someone, why make a documentary about that person?
Religious and moral grounds. REALLY? The Church of England was founded by Henry VIII because the Pope would not grant him a divorce. And Charles is divorced.
There hasn't been an English monarch since 1707. There isn't and English Royal family. King Charles is the King of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and it's commonwealth.@@MrBadjohn69
I hold to Wallis being an intersex individualwho had surgery to remove the male parts ... but had no womb being that Wallis never had any children in the marriages. Wallis was XY and Edward was bisexual.
You would think he would have studied the topic he talking about. He refers to Edward as 'the future king of England'????? There hasn't been an ENGLISH monarch since 1707.
![ลองสุ่มไอโฟน 990 โกงมั้ย? [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.101 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bfsWe0j492k/mqdefault.jpg)
This Documentary is a People Profiles Production on the life of Edward VIII. Please subscribe to their channel for more: www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfiles
Hurrah! The narrator with the amazing voice, great!
hazzah!!!
Very interesting but I have to disagree with one point. Wallis didn't have a long suffering second husband. They BOTH colluded to use Edward for whatever they could get out of him. They were both gold diggers and social climbers. She intended to leave Edward if he got too serious but he threatened to commit suicide if she did. I may be wrong but I think he even attempted it once to prove he was serious. She had no intention of marrying him, only ever using him, but couldn't have his death on her concscience. She begrudgingly divorced her husband. She treated Edward appalingly and with utter contempt thereafter. Trapped in a loveless marriage. After they married she still wrote to her now ex husband for two years. Letters saying, what have we done, how much she missed him and still loved him and how heartbroken she was. She was trapped and hated Edward for it. She spent the rest of their marriage putting him down in front of guests and ridiculing him for his perceived stupidity. Somehow he still seemed enthraled by her. Be careful what you wish for! This is facsinating... th-cam.com/video/Swd3ISRF_wY/w-d-xo.html
Wallis was intersex. The surgical option at the time was to remove/shorten the external MALE genitalia. Wallis had no female reproductive parts.
95% agree!!! I do think her second husband did suffer after awhile. Edward was obsessed with Wallis. He didn’t expect that
That kind of tends to happen, when you use emotional blackmail to manipulate people.
Actually, George V was not the eldest son of Edward VII. He had an elder brother named Albert who was the Prince of Wales, and he passed away while Queen Victoria still reigned. He was named after Prince Albert of course as Queen Victoria had decreed for at least one member of each generation thereafter in the Royal Family. It was on his passing that George became the first in line to the throne, and acceded to it in 1910.
I saw that. Huge mistake by the documentary makers. The reader sounds posher then the King.
And if correctly remembered, Mary of Teck was to have married the son of Victoria who died. But Victoria really wanted Mary as a daughter in law and had her marry George. Fortunately, that union was fruitful in every way with the sad youngest son John who had epilepsy and mental slowness and he died in his teens.
But I stand corrected here.
@TheMOX125 George V was the grandson of Queen Victoria, so, that actually made Mary of Teck her grand- daughter-in-law.
Fascinating deep dive! I didn’t know how complex Edward VIII's story really was. Thanks for bringing his life and controversial choices to light.
As a country we dodged a bullet with David's abdication. He was a weak man, easily led, and I feel they both came to regret the marriage. Wallis certainly did, as is illustrated by her letters to her former husband.
Wallis had no female parts other than indeterminate genitalia. Wallis was intersex but XY.
The similarities between the D&D of Windsor and the D&D of Sussex are striking and rather scary.
really ?the sussex's been hanging out w/nazis?
Yes, two weak men who wanted to give up their responsibilities and two women who thought they were in control and got more than they bargained for!🤣
@@Roz-y2d Harry's not weak. Harry his wife & child & fled for their safety. He doesn't get the generous allowance the duke of windsor got (and Andrew gets.) He had just get in w/it.
And nice of you to compare an aa woman to a damn nazi.
@@tarawright6571Wow, you really believe that? And btw I don’t think David and Wallis were Nazis. What’s an ‘aa’ woman?
@@Roz-y2d African-American.
They were at least sympathetizers. The Duke of windsor also incouraged the blitz, hoping eng would surrender & the Germans would put him back on the throne.
Had he not married, all it would have done was put Elizabeth II on the throne at least two decades later.
George the 5th was the second son. His brother who was the first born. Died with the flu before he could ascend to the throne.
Sometimes history isn’t pretty…..
Glad to see truth and facts presented objectively 👍😀
Hieno dokumentti ja upea kerronta! Iso kiitos kertojalle, juuri oikea ääni ja tapa kertoa tälläinen tarina.
……Edward had arrested development set at age 14. He was a simp. Not fit for purpose as a King. Excellent for Britain, he was forced to abdicate by the P M, the A of C, & Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon…………
Wow! That’s exactly what I’ve said, especially after watching a few docs about the crisis.
His brother , later George VI, was "in harms way" at the Battle of Jutland...
George V wasn't the eldest son of Edward VII. He was the second son. His older brother was Albert Victor.
Bravo! I almost stopped the video when this inaccurate statement was made. Sloppy!
@@michaelmorrow1844 The narrater is a posh Englishman. He should have known better. George V was the second son.
Need to correct the title. Traitor king
The present King married his mistress. Remember Princess Di?
David & Harry have very similar simpleton personalities
Harry didn’t collaborate with Hitler.
I think Andrew needs to be added to that list. He's also useless, stupid and conniving.
It's thought David had aspergers. I read an artical by Baron cohen about it.
Unfortunately, Charles really was enamored of David and admired his individuality, mores the pity
Even IF he wasn't a traitor, he still ran away from his responsibilities as king. I agree with his assistant private secretary, Alan Lacelles, who thought "...that the best thing that could happen to him, and to the country, would be for him to break his neck."
Don't agree with you.
Why is someone not allowed to say no to the roll of King? Maybe he felt he was not suitable for it.
The UK dodged a bullet and got George VI and Elizabeth II.
We have another traitor today his name is henry... At least edward didn't lie about his family, henry did & does
Wasn’t Edward in ‘bed’ with Hitler?
Hello from 🇺🇸
When did Harry committ treason? When? Because he spoke out about the ill treatment his wife was receiving? Because he exposed that the Royal Family are racists?
Edward did committ treason . Hitler and Edward made a secret deal that if Germany invaded and conquered England , they would restore Edward to the throne as Hitler's puppet king .
Big fucking difference !
@@peggyh4805He sure was . Big time and there is proof .
Edward should have been imprisoned , if not executed for high treason .
@@peggyh4805 oh dear.
@@freyasslain2203……yes, it’s long been thought he passed battle plans’ of the Allies’ in France, to the Germans’………that’s treason, & he should’ve been court martialled for it. In war time, that carries a death sentence………
It's a shame we don't learn all this at school.xx
My generation did…
Now we have the duke and duchess of Sussex 🙄
I don't see the similarities . Not at all . Harry , never at anytime committed High Treason . While the Duke and Duchess most certainly did .
But he thought dressing like a Nazi a costume party was clever.
@AndyAnderson-b9u Why not ? Were not the royal family filled with Nazis , starting with the Duke of Windsor. Haven't you read certain correspondence , between Churchill and Roosevelt? You know Churchill informs Roosevelt of Hitler's plot to restore The Duke of Windsor to the throne? Apparently, the Duke of Windsor and Adolf Hitler brokered a deal that if Germany conquered Great Britain, Adolf Hitler would restore The Duke of Windsor to the throne ?
Wasn't Queen Victoria 's youngest grandson , Charles Edward - Duke of Coburg served The Third Reich . And Wasn't one of their cousins , The Prince of Waldeck -Piermont , didn't he serve the Third Reich as a Camp Commandant of the Buchenwald Concentration camp ? Oh and what about The Princess of Hohenloe - Langenburg? Aaaah yes. That family was filled with Nazis.
I think Henry's Halloween costume was quite appropriate of this family . Don't you think ?
My advice : Before you cite anything relevant to World War Two , be very careful how you tread . You just might run into a historian . Someone who can and will mop up the floor with you .
George VI saw action in the navy at the battle of Jutland
I do fully understand if someone who is born to become King or Queen chooses to thank for that. I believe strongly they are allowed to do so. No one should be forced to take the roll.
Very important that British Royals, and nobility class be preserved 🇬🇧
Are you drunk?
Are you ok?🤡🤡🤡 Serf!!! If you want to be a Serf, go live on some Lord’s estate. Don’t force Serfdom on the rest of us..
I agree, it’s always been stabilising for Britain.
@@Roz-y2d Really? Having a monarchy is what makes England stable? In that casr England MUST be rejoicing since Prince Harry is coming back.
I'm far from a monarchist, but I can't help but feeel almost a touch of Providence in replacing a weak and morally compromised man like Edward VIII with a much better king (and man) in George VI.
Fascinating!
Of course he did conspire with the Nazis. In part, major part that he was the Submissive of Wallis. And in the minority his own feelings towards war and suffering.
"But the thing about betrayal is that it never comes from your enemies"-Lawkeeper Equity Mlp Ace Attorney EOJ
Thanks.
Very nice zabdes shering
He was weak
Seems ridiculous, even comical, to suggest he was not a bright mind and that all of a sudden, Germany would listen to him on military strategy and decide, based on something he said to some Portuguese businessman in private, to bomb London. Germany most likely already had that plan in the offing way before and it was part of the natural processes of war. First take care of your immediate enemies then the more distant ones. I venture to say also, that most likely the Germans did not regard him as a brilliant strategist of warfare and therefore would not follow advice from him nor anyone else who like him, did not have a true military career.
I stand firm in my faith, trusting God's plan. Grateful for blessings, I thank Him for prosperity. My family's happiness is restored, and retirement brings unexpected abundance, $57k weekly returns, a life transforming miracle after past struggles.
Hello how do you make such weekly??
I'm a born Christian and sometimes I feel so down of myself because of low finance but I still believe in God.
@@KuramaUchiha-id1owMaria Angelina Alexander I really appreciate her efforts and transparency.
Giving her my initial savings of $12,000 to invest in a brokerage account was a turning point in my life. It's been an incredibly rewarding experience and the best decision I ever made!
I would really like to know how this actually works.
Investing can be a powerful tool for building wealth and securing financial stability especially in this hard time. but it’s important to understand that it’s not without its challenges. The investment landscape is inherently volatile, with periods of both gains and losses. This variability is a natural part of investing and requires a clear strategy and patience to navigate effectively.
Before I say my peace, I believe things went the way they were meant to back then.... And the UK had the best choice for the monarchy. But how unfair it was/is that they couldn't marry and still be part of the family and Harry and Megan could and did. Also look at the trials that Princess Margaret went through in her relationships. Quite unfair. Quite.
Different times …
He gave up the crown! Should have had to give up the titles and the income!
Maybe misguided but not a traitor
The real traitors were the treaty with poland instigators
Who failed to help before
Declaring and after declaring
War particularly the french
Who had no offensive strategy!
We make all this lies up
this title is a lie. A King can never be a traitor, for he is the head of state.
Quite the opposite happened, he was betrayed, and history is being written by those who betrayed him!
He was seen as betraying the people, but you’re right, he was betrayed by his family and the government coz he was ousted. But I just can’t feel sorry about that!
He was no longer a king when he became a traitor.
@@JohnBarrington-y8n he was no longer a King because of the traitors that forced him to abdicate.
A King can never be a traitor, that is the point.
He was not a traitor ... 👎
Not stolen read 'Traitor King' by Andrew Lownie
21 century ... who cares ????
a few centuries back it would have been witchcraft -heaven knows she wasnt pretty
I guess beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.
Traitor king? More like weak ass king 😂
Why did the authors of this documentary choose a subject about whom they have such negative feelings? If you don’t like or approve of someone, why make a documentary about that person?
Because it’s a big part of World history.
Religious and moral grounds. REALLY?
The Church of England was founded by Henry VIII because the Pope would not grant him a divorce.
And Charles is divorced.
True, but it wasn’t only that, was it?
@@Roz-y2d In a nutshell, YES. And the head of the church of England is the sitting English monarch. How does that make sense?
There hasn't been an English monarch since 1707. There isn't and English Royal family. King Charles is the King of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and it's commonwealth.@@MrBadjohn69
I hold to Wallis being an intersex individualwho had surgery to remove the male parts ... but had no womb being that Wallis never had any children in the marriages. Wallis was XY and Edward was bisexual.
Unlikely!
Royalty is a waste of space and taxpayers money.
How did you manage to make this story boring? Fire the narrator.
Its AI - they fed the script to eleven labs.
@@cybermaventechit’s not ai.
You would think he would have studied the topic he talking about. He refers to Edward as 'the future king of England'????? There hasn't been an ENGLISH monarch since 1707.
Mia figlia la devi lasciare stare la devi lasciare stare e sabato oggi e sabato oggi è l'ultimo matrimonio alla caletta cameriera
Mmmm, what’s up with you?🤣