T21:25: the issue of Spark ... small local groups are sparked to open conflict when the regional, and these in turn, when the global or superpowers, find it convenient-expedient to entertain a local conflict. Otherwise, locals cannot sustain a significant (meaning, internationally significant) open and prolonged conflict. Meaning: if the local conflict is of value to regional and global powers, it will be sparked ... that is why we have ambassadors cultivating local `elites' or clients in countries we may wish to destabilize at some point.
Stop blaming the USA and other superpowers, for the internal failures and corruption within your own society. Own your own culture and society's failures and problems instead of blaming someone else richer than you.
This read is timely for us here in the Philippines where we are two weeks away from elections between a highly popular administration candidate who leads by a mile in the surveys against the opposition candidate backed up by the "elite" society.
@@NoodlepunkThat's because that's what the data says. You can't "both sides" a problem that isn't a both-sides problem. 65% of militias are white supremacist and 25% are anti government, that's 90% far right wing. That's 10 to 1 odds there's a far right civil war vs a far left one.
Hmmm, not stop, because they're already started it's pretty hard to stop until one side wins. Prevention though, that's what you were really asking for. Basically, get the vote out, especially in the contested states, get and keep the majority, preferably a super majority, implement the reforms, and don't institute martial law violence escalations against violent demonstrations. Unfortunately, we have to suffer fools or else we lose democracy.
mission: What countries around the world will experience political unrest and violence in the near future with triggers and positive feedback back from us. How can we destabilize people and societies we don't like.
Answer: the United States. How: coronatarianism and insane energy policies. And insane technocracy hello missing baby formula because Europeans don’t order the words of ingredients the same way? These people are evil.
gread job marveles how it was excluded the vast interest of the usa to fuel or even escalate this civil wars in some countries excluded by this book to exclude the doings of the usa and the orchestrating of most of the wars after 2000 make this book some kind of a joke or insult on independent academies and other thinking people on this planet
Interesting talk. I don’t agree with several conclusions. The US is not a democracy. We are a constitutional republic with some, but not all, functions democratic. Only Switzerland and the US are such. And both are assailed by international watch dogs that are from true democracies that rate our adherence to “democracy”. Our adherence is to freedom, collective and personal. It’s in our Declaration of Independence. It’s in our constitution. It’s the bases for our bill of rights. Democracy and freedom are not synomous. America becomes weaker as we try to become a democracy in the pattern of Canada, England and so forth. The disruptive power of a democracy is that of the majority being able to oppress a minority by a simple vote. We see this playing out right now in Canada. Basic human rights are being denied to a segment of that population by a majority government. Witness a “democracy” descending into a popularly elected autocracy. Because in a democracy such as Canada there is no functional bill of rights. No protection for the minority from the majority. Civil war comes from moral extremism. When any group has a utopian view on any issue and gains political superiority, then uses that power to “fix” a problem civil war MAY result. To avoid civil war the plurality of the entire population must recognize the problem and be willing to address that problem in reasonable terms. The American civil war is an example. On the single issue of many that divided the country, slavery, about 80% of the population had ambivalent feelings. The other 20% were split into two camps who were rabidly pro and con on that issue. The vast majority were willing to seek a solution over time at minimal “cost” to society in the short term. This took the form of free and slave states and a mish mash of laws dealing with escaped slaves. Don’t misunderstand. Slavery is wrong. It needed to be corrected. But at what cost? How? And how fast? The urge to moral perfection cost half a million casualties in battle, half the country reduced to rubble and the national treasure squandered. And the slaves? Freed. Instantly. But not prepared to fend for themselves in any functional way. So what was the cost of that freedom? Was that the intended consequence? There is also a bias in her analysis. The allegation that Trump collided with Russia, and that he was prepared to retain power after the election were widely accepted at the time of Bidens inauguration. Recent factual evidence in the last year has completely refuted the collusion claim that persisted for four years. It is now seen to be political dis-information and those involved are facing indictments by the independent counsel. In a like manner Trumps allegation of election fraud is beginning to be seen as valid. Several states are now investigating the 2020 election finding several cases of election fraud and vote tampering. Again indictments are in process. Further a pattern is emerging in the methods and three states are discussing charges of RICO actions against inter state operatives. All of these facts were ignored in your analysis.
Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms enshrined within its constitution. What is NOT in that Charter is the right to break the law by blocking access to public roads or by blaring air horns 24 hours a day in violation with noise bylaws. The alleged issue of the protest was that international truck drivers would no longer be given a pass on vaccination requirements for crossing the border. Even if Canada had continue to waive that requirement the UNITED STATES would not have and these truckers would still be out of luck. They might as well have been protesting having to wear to wear seatbelts or carry passports, which are both requirements for entry into the U.S. The protests were tolerated for 3 weeks, which is probably 2 weeks and 5 days longer than they should have been. Minority rights are VERY strongly protected in Canada. The irony of the anti-vax protestors is that there is a very great overlap between them and their supporters and those who oppose minority rights for others, be they LGTB, religious, ethnic or racial minorities.
@@michaelmanning5379 And in your charter there is the implied right to peaceful protest. Blocking roads and blowing horns, while annoying is generally considered peaceful. The oppressed minority in this case were the truckers and those who supported them. Arrest and detention, freezing of assets, confiscation of property without due process...those are not actions of a government restrained by the charter you reference. View those actions out of the context of Canada and they appear more like Tiananmen Square. Finally, minorities are not only those popularly defined as LBGT or racial groups. They are literally any group that disagrees politically or morally with the democratic majority. In this case they are truckers and working class supporters, and conservative members of parliament. I remain unswayed in my considered opinion on this matter. Your argument was circumstantial and presented no systematic facts to the contrary. Fox out.
@@MrJento The truckers who refuse to take a vaccine may be a minority but they are not an oppressed one. They made a conscious decision to not meet the requirements laid out by the United States for entry into the U.S. In doing so they ceded their claim to lucrative cross-border hauling jobs. Nothing in Canadian law prevents them from earning a living driving unvaccinated within Canada. They were given the benefit of interrupted occupation of a public street for far longer than any other group has ever been accommodated. They refused all attempts to mediate a solution. Indeed, their demands just grew to outrageous proportions, including that, in contravention of both constitutional convention and democratic norms, the Governor General dissolve parliament. That's not how a Westminster-style democracy works. They have NOT been denied due process. The only arrests made were those necessitated by the obdurate refusal to obey legal rulings and judicial orders. Disagreeing with policy is not licence to break the law, be that in downtown Ottawa or downtown Seattle.
Oh my. I have heard this b4. Honeypot much. So ..... Nm smh not even conservative but jeezus narrative. Umm so where's George? It was 4 of them ha? F....me
That's okay, you aren't required to be the demographic that understands, cares, or is able to comprehend this stuff. You're free to go, citizen. Go do good in the world.
T21:25: the issue of Spark ... small local groups are sparked to open conflict when the regional, and these in turn, when the global or superpowers, find it convenient-expedient to entertain a local conflict. Otherwise, locals cannot sustain a significant (meaning, internationally significant) open and prolonged conflict. Meaning: if the local conflict is of value to regional and global powers, it will be sparked ... that is why we have ambassadors cultivating local `elites' or clients in countries we may wish to destabilize at some point.
Stop blaming the USA and other superpowers, for the internal failures and corruption within your own society. Own your own culture and society's failures and problems instead of blaming someone else richer than you.
@@718junius Thank you for your original analysis.
Thank you Barbara.
This read is timely for us here in the Philippines where we are two weeks away from elections between a highly popular administration candidate who leads by a mile in the surveys against the opposition candidate backed up by the "elite" society.
the wm give her all kind of hate in comment section but she is totally correct! amazing insight!!
I am afraid for my country Pakistan 🇵🇰 it's already broken and can't control a civil war 💔
How dissent manifests and how to squash it.
If you are a coronatarian you are a boot licking pawn of the regime.
Pretty much I have listened to a lot of her talks and she totally disregards left wing violence. And only ever talks about right wings violence.
@@NoodlepunkThat's because that's what the data says. You can't "both sides" a problem that isn't a both-sides problem. 65% of militias are white supremacist and 25% are anti government, that's 90% far right wing. That's 10 to 1 odds there's a far right civil war vs a far left one.
Great talk, everything is true.
You are dreaming hard.
Welcome to the American dream.nightmare
Have the model been simulated on Malaysia? Malaysia's political parties are highly racial. How close Malaysia is to civil war?
FFS what part has the part where civil wars are stopped?
Hmmm, not stop, because they're already started it's pretty hard to stop until one side wins. Prevention though, that's what you were really asking for. Basically, get the vote out, especially in the contested states, get and keep the majority, preferably a super majority, implement the reforms, and don't institute martial law violence escalations against violent demonstrations. Unfortunately, we have to suffer fools or else we lose democracy.
mission: What countries around the world will experience political unrest and violence in the near future with triggers and positive feedback back from us. How can we destabilize people and societies we don't like.
Answer: the United States. How: coronatarianism and insane energy policies. And insane technocracy hello missing baby formula because Europeans don’t order the words of ingredients the same way? These people are evil.
All branches are equally important and have equal powers
gread job marveles how it was excluded the vast interest of the usa to fuel or even escalate this civil wars in some countries excluded by this book to exclude the doings of the usa and the orchestrating of most of the wars after 2000 make this book some kind of a joke or insult on independent academies and other thinking people on this planet
I see the Russian Troll farms hate this video. Points in it's favor right there.
Like America or EU doesnt produce fake information hype to " justify" wars???
🤔
Ok, McCarthy
Interesting talk. I don’t agree with several conclusions.
The US is not a democracy. We are a constitutional republic with some, but not all, functions democratic. Only Switzerland and the US are such. And both are assailed by international watch dogs that are from true democracies that rate our adherence to “democracy”.
Our adherence is to freedom, collective and personal. It’s in our Declaration of Independence. It’s in our constitution. It’s the bases for our bill of rights. Democracy and freedom are not synomous. America becomes weaker as we try to become a democracy in the pattern of Canada, England and so forth.
The disruptive power of a democracy is that of the majority being able to oppress a minority by a simple vote. We see this playing out right now in Canada. Basic human rights are being denied to a segment of that population by a majority government. Witness a “democracy” descending into a popularly elected autocracy. Because in a democracy such as Canada there is no functional bill of rights. No protection for the minority from the majority.
Civil war comes from moral extremism. When any group has a utopian view on any issue and gains political superiority, then uses that power to “fix” a problem civil war MAY result. To avoid civil war the plurality of the entire population must recognize the problem and be willing to address that problem in reasonable terms.
The American civil war is an example. On the single issue of many that divided the country, slavery, about 80% of the population had ambivalent feelings. The other 20% were split into two camps who were rabidly pro and con on that issue. The vast majority were willing to seek a solution over time at minimal “cost” to society in the short term. This took the form of free and slave states and a mish mash of laws dealing with escaped slaves. Don’t misunderstand. Slavery is wrong. It needed to be corrected. But at what cost? How? And how fast?
The urge to moral perfection cost half a million casualties in battle, half the country reduced to rubble and the national treasure squandered. And the slaves? Freed. Instantly. But not prepared to fend for themselves in any functional way. So what was the cost of that freedom? Was that the intended consequence?
There is also a bias in her analysis. The allegation that Trump collided with Russia, and that he was prepared to retain power after the election were widely accepted at the time of Bidens inauguration. Recent factual evidence in the last year has completely refuted the collusion claim that persisted for four years. It is now seen to be political dis-information and those involved are facing indictments by the independent counsel. In a like manner Trumps allegation of election fraud is beginning to be seen as valid. Several states are now investigating the 2020 election finding several cases of election fraud and vote tampering. Again indictments are in process. Further a pattern is emerging in the methods and three states are discussing charges of RICO actions against inter state operatives. All of these facts were ignored in your analysis.
Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms enshrined within its constitution. What is NOT in that Charter is the right to break the law by blocking access to public roads or by blaring air horns 24 hours a day in violation with noise bylaws. The alleged issue of the protest was that international truck drivers would no longer be given a pass on vaccination requirements for crossing the border. Even if Canada had continue to waive that requirement the UNITED STATES would not have and these truckers would still be out of luck. They might as well have been protesting having to wear to wear seatbelts or carry passports, which are both requirements for entry into the U.S.
The protests were tolerated for 3 weeks, which is probably 2 weeks and 5 days longer than they should have been. Minority rights are VERY strongly protected in Canada. The irony of the anti-vax protestors is that there is a very great overlap between them and their supporters and those who oppose minority rights for others, be they LGTB, religious, ethnic or racial minorities.
@@michaelmanning5379
And in your charter there is the implied right to peaceful protest. Blocking roads and blowing horns, while annoying is generally considered peaceful.
The oppressed minority in this case were the truckers and those who supported them. Arrest and detention, freezing of assets, confiscation of property without due process...those are not actions of a government restrained by the charter you reference. View those actions out of the context of Canada and they appear more like Tiananmen Square.
Finally, minorities are not only those popularly defined as LBGT or racial groups. They are literally any group that disagrees politically or morally with the democratic majority. In this case they are truckers and working class supporters, and conservative members of parliament.
I remain unswayed in my considered opinion on this matter. Your argument was circumstantial and presented no systematic facts to the contrary.
Fox out.
@@MrJento The truckers who refuse to take a vaccine may be a minority but they are not an oppressed one. They made a conscious decision to not meet the requirements laid out by the United States for entry into the U.S. In doing so they ceded their claim to lucrative cross-border hauling jobs. Nothing in Canadian law prevents them from earning a living driving unvaccinated within Canada.
They were given the benefit of interrupted occupation of a public street for far longer than any other group has ever been accommodated. They refused all attempts to mediate a solution. Indeed, their demands just grew to outrageous proportions, including that, in contravention of both constitutional convention and democratic norms, the Governor General dissolve parliament. That's not how a Westminster-style democracy works.
They have NOT been denied due process. The only arrests made were those necessitated by the obdurate refusal to obey legal rulings and judicial orders.
Disagreeing with policy is not licence to break the law, be that in downtown Ottawa or downtown Seattle.
Well said.
Wow. Wrong on every count
Oh my. I have heard this b4. Honeypot much. So ..... Nm smh not even conservative but jeezus narrative. Umm so where's George? It was 4 of them ha? F....me
Hp dejen de estar hablando de mi ustede seban aeecordar de mi 🙏
How come I never heard of these two comedians before? Superb double act. Could benefit from a few more catchphrases.
You haven't heard of them before because they're smart people.
Kinda based
If you were to give me days , maybe weeks... I done believe I could think of any single thing more ridiculously boring than this time killer here.
That's okay, you aren't required to be the demographic that understands, cares, or is able to comprehend this stuff. You're free to go, citizen. Go do good in the world.
Uh dude, back off the mic
Ms. Walter needs to invest in a speech class. Listening to her say "Um, Um, Um" nearly every other word is painful to hear. LEARN TO SPEAK!