As someone going through dietary changes to lose weight and as someone that struggles with Food Addiction, it's important to make small, manageable changes that you can stay consistent with. Don't beat yourself up if you slip up, but do try to get back on track ASAP. Once you're comfortable with a change made, make another small change. You'll be surprised how quickly you start to feel different. Even if you just take the foods you already have and just reduce the portion sizes. Admittedly the weight is only slowly trickling down, but damn to I feel healthier and really feel that my stomach had shrunk. Keep trucking guys, you got this! ❤️(P.S. - Eating Wheat Biscuits and Semi-skimmed milk for brekkie!)
38:40 I would also maybe try to have a conversation about what's making her feel this way? Like what insecurity is being triggered by OP having the in game gf and see if that helps. But yeh if she's not vibin w/it it would be an asshole thing to keep doing it behind her back
After checking the OP's post history, I think I can tell where that insecurity comes from. There's a now deleted/removed post he made titled "AITA for asking my partner to reconsider going to couples therapy or letting me sleep with other people once in a while?". So I can see why she may be worried about any "in game" relationships he was in tbh
I disagree with the first submission. I think if the other player provoked PVP then they knew there was a risk of their character being killed. I think UnicornDaddy should have warned the other player that they would actually kill Panine and give them an opportunity to disagree. However I do agree that it was an Asshole move to kill the character because their was an issue between the players
I think the main problem here is that in previous PVP encounters, no one had been killed. So there was an illusion of safety there. My group does PVP but we know there is a no killing rule, I established that as DM with other rules too.
@@danaslitlist1 You’re absolutely right! And I think they address this well in the podcast in that the DM should have done more to establish the rules of PVP before it got to the point of death. In my campaign we play a lot of characters at odds with each other at times and so PVP death WAS on the table. But it was discussed before hand rather than after a PC was killed by another. :)
First things first, I'm eating ravioli. Second thing second XD I don't even play DND but you were suggested in my YT feed and I really enjoyed watching this!
okay the first one: for me, jacks scenario of training to use abilities wouldn’t be PvP. PvP to me implies hostility between PLAYERS as well as characters and imo is so hard to do well that it’s best to remove it all together.
With the pvp thing first you do need to clear up that it's a character dispute and not a player dispute. But then I would just warn the tortle player that if they execute a PC while they are unconscious that they will have to roll a new character and I as the dm am going to play their character. If they ask why, the answer is that that is villain behavior, period, so their character will be a villain until the party kills them or until they complete a redemption arc.
Lawful evil would not be doing the wrong things for the right reasons, if anything that's chaotic good and lawful evil is doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason
Idk about inviting the gf to sit in on a game to see that the in-game romance isn't something more serious. If it were me in that position (feeling off about this, he doesn't want to stop, he says it's nothing, etc) I'd hit the roof if he tried to get her involved in our disagreement. That would convince me more than anything that he was screwing around. Imo it's not going to get better when he's digging his heels in and trying to convince her it's nothing. I'd just end it and ask her first next time. It could be that she's not ok with rp romances at all, but it could be it's something that feels wrong to her about this one. Either way though they need to talk about why she felt this way.
I can see both sides of this. I think ultimately it depends on their relationship! Because if I was the gf, I think seeing what my partner was doing and what the in game relationship looked like might be helpful. Because he’s not trying to get the other person involved, he’s showing her what the game looks like. But that depends on the individual.
As someone going through dietary changes to lose weight and as someone that struggles with Food Addiction, it's important to make small, manageable changes that you can stay consistent with.
Don't beat yourself up if you slip up, but do try to get back on track ASAP. Once you're comfortable with a change made, make another small change. You'll be surprised how quickly you start to feel different. Even if you just take the foods you already have and just reduce the portion sizes.
Admittedly the weight is only slowly trickling down, but damn to I feel healthier and really feel that my stomach had shrunk.
Keep trucking guys, you got this! ❤️(P.S. - Eating Wheat Biscuits and Semi-skimmed milk for brekkie!)
Yeah… we’re only half way through the subtember goals 👁️👁️
38:40 I would also maybe try to have a conversation about what's making her feel this way? Like what insecurity is being triggered by OP having the in game gf and see if that helps. But yeh if she's not vibin w/it it would be an asshole thing to keep doing it behind her back
After checking the OP's post history, I think I can tell where that insecurity comes from. There's a now deleted/removed post he made titled "AITA for asking my partner to reconsider going to couples therapy or letting me sleep with other people once in a while?". So I can see why she may be worried about any "in game" relationships he was in tbh
@@cassidyjr Y I K E S! I can't say I'd be comfortable w/that either if he'd been posting other stuff like that.
I disagree with the first submission. I think if the other player provoked PVP then they knew there was a risk of their character being killed. I think UnicornDaddy should have warned the other player that they would actually kill Panine and give them an opportunity to disagree. However I do agree that it was an Asshole move to kill the character because their was an issue between the players
I think the main problem here is that in previous PVP encounters, no one had been killed. So there was an illusion of safety there. My group does PVP but we know there is a no killing rule, I established that as DM with other rules too.
@@danaslitlist1 You’re absolutely right! And I think they address this well in the podcast in that the DM should have done more to establish the rules of PVP before it got to the point of death. In my campaign we play a lot of characters at odds with each other at times and so PVP death WAS on the table. But it was discussed before hand rather than after a PC was killed by another. :)
I’m eating Quesadillas! 🤣 I found you guys on TikTok and decided to subscribe here 🖤
Eating a ghost shaped cookie from Barnes and Noble!
First things first, I'm eating ravioli.
Second thing second XD I don't even play DND but you were suggested in my YT feed and I really enjoyed watching this!
LOL welcome to the chaos!! 😂
You're both Beautiful people what makes you feel comfortable and happy in your own skin is most important 💜
okay the first one: for me, jacks scenario of training to use abilities wouldn’t be PvP. PvP to me implies hostility between PLAYERS as well as characters and imo is so hard to do well that it’s best to remove it all together.
With the pvp thing first you do need to clear up that it's a character dispute and not a player dispute. But then I would just warn the tortle player that if they execute a PC while they are unconscious that they will have to roll a new character and I as the dm am going to play their character. If they ask why, the answer is that that is villain behavior, period, so their character will be a villain until the party kills them or until they complete a redemption arc.
I'm on my lunch at work, having some leftover pasta bolognese 😊
Lawful evil would not be doing the wrong things for the right reasons, if anything that's chaotic good and lawful evil is doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason
I love how out of date the Subtember goals list is lol
New intro let's go. I'm eating plum wine cheese and a charcuterie trio of salami for lunch.
I’m eating a chocolate lava cake from Domino’s
we saw all of the spider reaction
FAFO = Nemo me impune lacessit
ooh new intro let’s go. i’m eating chicken udon
Idk about inviting the gf to sit in on a game to see that the in-game romance isn't something more serious. If it were me in that position (feeling off about this, he doesn't want to stop, he says it's nothing, etc) I'd hit the roof if he tried to get her involved in our disagreement. That would convince me more than anything that he was screwing around.
Imo it's not going to get better when he's digging his heels in and trying to convince her it's nothing. I'd just end it and ask her first next time. It could be that she's not ok with rp romances at all, but it could be it's something that feels wrong to her about this one. Either way though they need to talk about why she felt this way.
I can see both sides of this. I think ultimately it depends on their relationship! Because if I was the gf, I think seeing what my partner was doing and what the in game relationship looked like might be helpful. Because he’s not trying to get the other person involved, he’s showing her what the game looks like. But that depends on the individual.
Will be eating some sort of pork with with rice soon.
A FORMAL INTRODUCTION?!
🌙
Holy shit I’m the first viewer! Sick 😂
30:58 dump the irl girlfriend, keep the dnd relationship😂