Remote Viewing: The IDEOGRAM EXPERIMENT

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ต.ค. 2024
  • What's an Ideogram? Who can "read them"? How do they work? This experiment conducted in 2023 tried to find out, enlisting amateur Remote Viewers.
    John Vivanco TDS RV Training - hemispheres.in...

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @ckrieg4151
    @ckrieg4151 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Fascinating. This was an amazing experiment.

    • @dondec
      @dondec  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hope it was educational too, thanks for participating.

  • @guntherrattay5462
    @guntherrattay5462 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Understanding the ideogram as a highly sophisticared symbolic language with extremely compressed information it totally makes sense to probe another's ideogram.
    There is a visual layer for shapes ("motion"), an underlying layer for substance ("feeling") and further in depth layers.

    • @RemoteViewingTraining-DACH
      @RemoteViewingTraining-DACH 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ... too far fetched ...? Not at all!!!
      More than 40 years ago a well educated group of people has done the same to pave the path to today´s internet! They developed the OSI model of layers for communication as shown here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model
      Why shouldn´t consciousness be able to do the same myriads of millenias ago?

  • @Gamiliell
    @Gamiliell 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    so glad to be part of it … i did learn a lot ☺️💕

  • @hrvg-viewer
    @hrvg-viewer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is so interesting, great job, Don! I wish I knew about the experiment earlier, I would have loved to have worked it. Now, I am going to go through my old sessions and see what I can find out. Thanks for sharing this.

    • @dondec
      @dondec  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Much appreciated, thank you.

  • @magicinthenoise
    @magicinthenoise 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great work Don! It's exciting to see you pushing for new insights into remote viewing!

    • @dondec
      @dondec  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm trying... takes time, but I'm trying. Thanks for checking in MagicInTheNoise.

  • @american_cosmic
    @american_cosmic 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Always nice to see a new video upload from you, Don! It's always about an interesting subject. Hope you're doing well these days!

    • @dondec
      @dondec  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the vote of confidence Cosmic_American. Much appreciated.

  • @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
    @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another awesome vid on an extremely interesting subject. Great work. Well done.
    Don, if you ever want to view a weird terrestrial target, that no one talks about or really knows much of, can I suggest the "Isle Royale Anomaly" or the "Lake Superior/Isle Royale Anomaly"? Is there any way you could check that out? It's right next to a major shipping route and when ships go over it there are often magnetic issues that arise on the wet compass. There is also a missing F-89 that disappeared here in 1950-51, and it's called the "Kinross Incident" because that's the name of the base where the jet was scrambled from. Is there any way to see if something weird is going on there, or if it's just a natural feature on the bottom of Mother Lake Superior here? We have Ojibwa legends about strange things occurring here too, like talked about in the Legend of Nanabijou. Something to think about if you or anyone else is looking for strange targets. Again, great video!

    • @dondec
      @dondec  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have appreciated your interest for quite some time now. Your enthusiasm definitely adds to this community. Thank you, we appreciate it very much. I will consider your "targets".

    • @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
      @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dondecDon, this show just aired on another YT channel and I instantly thought of you. It's an extremely long episode but pretty interesting. th-cam.com/video/XRTon6qgVws/w-d-xo.htmlsi=tg666E91TM2ZGXY4

  • @omerfaruksimsek1238
    @omerfaruksimsek1238 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    yes.the ideogram more like a symbolic reference.ı think it is similar to treasure maps signgs and symbols.

  • @MindTools.
    @MindTools. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi Don, do you think that remote viewing revolves around the set of numbers for the target or do you think that the assignment is set on a specific target and the people doing the remote viewing are tapping into the target without the need of the numbers? Like a Psychic Medium Detective is able to get accurate information without a set of numbers, simply they are tapping into the greater consciousness and receiving information about the case. Take the NZ program "Sensing Murder" for example, where each psychic medium is simply given a face down photograph of the victim and no verbal information and you see each psychic medium put their hands over the turned down photo and information comes flooding in. Then they eventually turn the photo over and they continue to get more and more accurate information. No set of numbers were required and quite frankly they did not need the photo either as you see them locate exact locations on maps and able to drive to buildings where events took place and they don't bother to take the photo with them as they are fully tapped in and tuned into the higher conscious for that accurate info. What are your thoughts?
    Couldn't a remote viewer simply go into a relaxed state of mind and focus their intention on receiving info about the target in question (without knowing what the target is)? The person or persons have set the target, and the remote viewers are simply tapping into that information. I guess I am not sure why remote viewing bothers with the set of numbers and with cryptic scribbles and cryptic interpretations of those scribbles, when really all they need to do is simply close their eyes and get into a relaxed state and have the intention of tapping in and receiving information. This way the information received would not need to be interpreted as it would be very clear with a short movie scene or snap shots like photos, a lot more accurate I would of thought. I guess I just don't understand why remote viewing does it what seems to me an around about and rather difficult way of getting the info. Example if the target was of a pyramid in Egypt then you would literally see a pyramid in the dessert and you may even see Egyptian symbols clairvoyantly, very accurate indeed. Negates the need for numbers and scribbles I would have thought. Would love to hear your thoughts about this Don.

    • @dondec
      @dondec  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Target Reference Number (TRN) seems to be a handle or reference pointer to the Target, a level of indirection that historically works well. I remember John Vivanco (JV) telling us in class, he could draw a “smiley face” instead of a TRN and it would still work. “Intention” was the key, he said, associating your intent: this particular TRN (or symbol) is associated with this particular target.
      My experiment explored what JV was talking about. But I used Ideograms, for multiple reasons, as I explained in my video.
      But aren’t you curious just how far that idea would work. Suppose instead, I sent my Ideograms to my kids, and they copied them by hand, and sent their copies to the viewers… would viewers still get target contact? How many levels of indirection would work? That hasn’t been explored yet.
      RE: No TRNs
      For a single target, you have in your mind, I suppose the strength of your mental tasking might allow someone to “Remote View” it. Does it work? You seem to have strong views on this. Anything to share?
      The big problem with Mental Only tasking is: it defeats accurate verification. Suppose you intend for me to “view” your car, but instead I report on the phone call you just made… am I right or wrong? Would you even know? Remember, Remote Viewing is done BLIND… so me wanting to view some particular site, object or person… well I know what the target is already… that’s not RV.
      As for Visual Perception, it doesn’t seem to work the way I think you're describing. I have very poor Visual Perception, but strong Clairaudience, not in the sense of me hearing sounds at the site… more in the sense of a voice Describing the target in words and Ideogramatic suggestions. You’ve seen some of that in my video. In some of my other videos you’ll see me getting Words I never heard of, and had to look up. We all seem to have special skills, some developed more than others.

    • @MindTools.
      @MindTools. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dondec Cool point ref how far could you go with many people getting the same answers to the same Ideograms. Yes, not everyone has tapped into their clairvoyance. I am inclined to think it is teachable though as I did it by attending a free psychic development class where we all sat in comfy chairs and dulled down the lights and closed our eyes and went into a deep relaxation and boom I started getting visions. Visions like short movies and sometimes just snap shots like photos. All my visions were validated as accurate as I passed them onto the specific people in the class that they pertained to and each time I was accurate with info that had come to me. Amazing really. Interestingly I got visions every single time I attended this class when we went into deep relaxation, every single time. So makes me believe it is def teachable/attainable to everyone. I just thought you could use clairvoyance very effectively to remote view when you do not know what the target is, only the person who has set the target knows to validate that you are correct in your clairvoyant visions. You would simply go into a relaxed state and ask your higher conscious to show you what the target is and wait...wait for the visions to come in.
      However, as you said RV has been around for years and it works. I guess I am just naïve as I have only ever experienced clairvoyance and really showed a true passion in psychic detective tv series, as appose to RV. Interesting ref your clairaudience about words coming to you that you had to look up the meaning of, that happens to me also in general conversation hahahaha....crazy. Also I have experienced clairaudience in the third person before too. I was sitting in my car and I was contemplating leaving my job and all of a sudden I heard as loud as anything "they are going to loose her". I looked around to the cars next to mine to see if someone was talking to me but there was no one there...it was def clairaudience. Very cool experience I must say. Thanks Don, always nice chatting with you.

  • @rmoisio
    @rmoisio 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    there is an elephant encoded into your nixon ideo

    • @dondec
      @dondec  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I didn't see that, but I noticed the round insignia from the podium found its way in.

  • @snapsbymeli
    @snapsbymeli 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    How do you use this to find missing people

    • @dondec
      @dondec  8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I don't use my skills to find "missing ______", whatever that's missing. You might want to look up Pam Coronado though, who does do that kind of work, teaches courses at very reasonable prices, and was at one time on a TV show, which if I recall was called "Sensing Murder".